Efficacy of an orlistat‐resveratrol combination for weight loss in subjects with obesity: A randomized controlled trial
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of an orlistat‐resveratrol (O‐R) combination in subjects with obesity over a 6‐month period. Methods This study was a double‐blind, parallel, randomized controlled clinical trial. Patients fulfilling the selection criteria (age from 20 to 60 years and body mass ind...
Saved in:
Published in | Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) Vol. 24; no. 7; pp. 1454 - 1463 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.07.2016
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1930-7381 1930-739X 1930-739X |
DOI | 10.1002/oby.21523 |
Cover
Summary: | Objective
To evaluate the efficacy of an orlistat‐resveratrol (O‐R) combination in subjects with obesity over a 6‐month period.
Methods
This study was a double‐blind, parallel, randomized controlled clinical trial. Patients fulfilling the selection criteria (age from 20 to 60 years and body mass index (BMI) ≥30 and ≤39.9 kg/m2) consumed an energy‐reduced diet with 500 fewer calories than their usual diet for 2 weeks. Then the participants were randomly assigned to four groups, placebo, resveratrol, orlistat, or O‐R, and they consumed the energy‐reduced diet for 6 months. The study consisted of seven visits. During each visit, a 24‐h recall was performed, along with measurements of anthropometric and serum biochemical parameters.
Results
A total of 161 participants were selected. Of these, 84 participants completed the study. A significant weight loss of −6.82 kg (95% CI −8.37 to −5.26) was observed in the O‐R group compared with −3.50 kg (−5.05 to −1.95, P = 0.021) in the placebo group. In contrast, the −6.02 kg (−7.68 to −4.36) orlistat and −4.68 kg (−6.64 to −2.71) resveratrol monotherapy losses did not significantly differ from the placebo. Significant decreases in BMI, waist circumference, fat mass, triglycerides, leptin, and leptin/adiponectin ratio were observed with the O‐R combination.
Conclusions
The O‐R combination was the most effective weight loss treatment. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | National Clinical Trial Registry (Registro Nacional de Ensayos Clinicos—RNEC) of Mexico identifier 133300410A0152 (ECORL/RES‐052013) Clinical trial registration The authors declared no conflict of interest. Disclosure Funding agencies Laboratorios Senosiain S.A. de C.V. MAAP: protocol development, surveillance of the study follow‐up, manuscript writing, manuscript review; ERGSL: protocol development, manuscript writing, manuscript review; CGCV: patient selection, treatment follow‐up, surveillance of the dietary and pharmacological treatment, data collection; MGC: protocol development, statistical analysis, writing and editing/review of the manuscript. Author contributions SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
ISSN: | 1930-7381 1930-739X 1930-739X |
DOI: | 10.1002/oby.21523 |