Effect of Previous or Simultaneous Immunization with Canarypox Expressing Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Glycoprotein B (gB) on Response to Subunit gB Vaccine plus MF59 in Healthy CMV-Seronegative Adults

Development of a vaccine for prevention of congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease is a priority. This study evaluated a “prime-boost” strategy by comparing the safety and immunogenicity of 3 doses of subunit CMV glycoprotein B (gB) vaccine plus MF59 (a squalene-in-water emulsion), 2 doses of a can...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of infectious diseases Vol. 185; no. 5; pp. 686 - 690
Main Authors Bernstein, David I., Schleiss, Mark R., Berencsi, Klara, Gonczol, Eva, Dickey, Michelle, Khoury, Phil, Cadoz, Michel, Meric, Claude, Zahradnik, John, Duliege, Anne-Marie, Plotkin, Stanley
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chicago, IL The University of Chicago Press 01.03.2002
University of Chicago Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0022-1899
1537-6613
DOI10.1086/339003

Cover

More Information
Summary:Development of a vaccine for prevention of congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease is a priority. This study evaluated a “prime-boost” strategy by comparing the safety and immunogenicity of 3 doses of subunit CMV glycoprotein B (gB) vaccine plus MF59 (a squalene-in-water emulsion), 2 doses of a canarypox recombinant vaccine expressing CMVgB (ALVAC-CMVgB) followed by 2 doses of the subunit gB vaccine, 3 doses of both vaccines administered concomitantly, and placebo in 105 healthy, CMV-seronegative adults. Systemic adverse events were rare, but local reactions were common in all groups. After the first subunit vaccination, neutralizing antibody titers in the prime-boost group were comparable to those in subjects receiving 2 subunit vaccinations, indicating a priming effect of ALVAC-CMVgB. However, after the final dose, antibody and cell-mediated immune responses were not significantly different among the groups. All 3 vaccine regimens induced high-titer antibody and lymphoproliferative responses, but no benefit for priming or simultaneous vaccination was detected.
Bibliography:istex:54FC69B0CA1A6B48CC1F4D0675101FC7A8209F7C
ark:/67375/HXZ-PVVRN8BG-K
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0022-1899
1537-6613
DOI:10.1086/339003