Growth responses of gypsy moth larvae to elevated CO2: the influence of methods of insect rearing
Abstract The effects of elevated CO₂ on foliar chemistry of two tree species (Populus pseudo-simonii Kitag. and Betula platyphylla) and on growth of gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar L.) larvae were examined. Furthermore, we focused on the comparison of results on the growth responses of larvae obtained...
Saved in:
Published in | Insect science Vol. 18; no. 4; pp. 409 - 418 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Melbourne, Australia
Blackwell Publishing Asia
01.08.2011
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1672-9609 1744-7917 |
DOI | 10.1111/j.1744-7917.2011.01419.x |
Cover
Summary: | Abstract The effects of elevated CO₂ on foliar chemistry of two tree species (Populus pseudo-simonii Kitag. and Betula platyphylla) and on growth of gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar L.) larvae were examined. Furthermore, we focused on the comparison of results on the growth responses of larvae obtained from two methods of insect rearing, the no-choice feeding trial performed in the laboratory or in situ in open-top chambers. On the whole, both primary and secondary metabolites in the leaves of the two tree species were significantly affected by main effects of time (sampling date), CO₂ and species. Elevated CO₂ significantly increased the C : N ratio and concentrations of the soluble sugar, starch, total nonstructural carbohydrates, total phenolics and condensed tannins, but significantly decreased the concentration of nitrogen. Higher contents of total phenolics and condensed tannins were detected in the frass of larvae reared in elevated CO₂ treatments. Overall, the growth of gypsy moth larvae were significantly inhibited by elevated CO₂ and CO₂-induced changes in leaf quality. Our study did not indicate the two methods of insect rearing could influence the direction of effects of elevated CO₂ on the growth of individual insects; however, the magnitude of negative effects of elevated CO₂ on larval growth did differ between the two insect rearing methods, and it seems that the response magnitude was also mediated by larval age and host plant species. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | elevated CO2, leaf quality, Lymantria dispar, no-choice feeding, open-topchamber The effects of elevated CO2 on foliar chemistry of two tree species (Populus pseudo-simonii Kitag. and Betula platyphylla) and on growth of gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar L.) larvae were examined. Furthermore, we focused on the comparison of results on the growth responses of larvae obtained from two methods of insect rearing, the nochoice feeding trial performed in the laboratory or in situ in open-top chambers. On the whole, both primary and secondary metabolites in the leaves of the two tree species were significantly affected by main effects of time (sampling date), CO2 and species. Elevated CO2 significantly increased the C: N ratio and concentrations of the soluble sugar, starch, total nonstructural carbohydrates, total phenolics and condensed tannins, but significantly decreased the concentration of nitrogen. Higher contents of total phenolics and condensed tannins were detected in the frass of larvae reared in elevated CO2 treatments. Overall, the growth of gypsy moth larvae were significantly inhibited by elevated CO2 and CO2- induced changes in leaf quality. Our study did not indicate the two methods of insect rearing could influence the direction of effects of elevated CO2 on the growth of individual insects; however, the magnitude of negative effects of elevated CO2 on larval growth did differ between the two insect rearing methods, and it seems that the response magnitude was also mediated by larval age and host plant species. 11-3386/Q http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7917.2011.01419.x ark:/67375/WNG-2L3RHN7T-3 istex:D6F7FA872A02274A3E86FA1B0F204F1BC9D34834 ArticleID:INS1419 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
ISSN: | 1672-9609 1744-7917 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1744-7917.2011.01419.x |