Pharmacological preconditioning with the adenosine triphosphate–sensitive potassium channel opener pinacidil

Background. Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) decreases infarct size after global or regional ischemia. Potassium channel openers also precondition but are subject to dose-limiting vasodilation. We compared the mechanical and electrophysiological effects of ischemic and pharmacological preconditioning...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Annals of thoracic surgery Vol. 70; no. 2; pp. 595 - 601
Main Authors Saltman, Adam E, Krukenkamp, Irvin B, Gaudette, Glenn R, Horimoto, Hitoshi, Levitsky, Sidney
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier Inc 01.08.2000
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0003-4975
1552-6259
DOI10.1016/S0003-4975(00)01367-9

Cover

More Information
Summary:Background. Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) decreases infarct size after global or regional ischemia. Potassium channel openers also precondition but are subject to dose-limiting vasodilation. We compared the mechanical and electrophysiological effects of ischemic and pharmacological preconditioning in an isolated rabbit heart model. Methods. Rabbit hearts were preconditioned with either 10 μmol/L pinacidil alone (P−), 10 μmol/L pinacidil with 10 μmol/L phenylephrine (P+), or two cycles of global ischemia and reperfusion (IPC) before 1 hour of LAD occlusion. Left ventricular pressure, epicardial monophasic action potential duration (APD) and coronary flow were monitored throughout. Infarct size was determined at the end of reperfusion. Results. Regional ischemia uniformly decreased APD ( p < 0.05). During reperfusion, APDs were prolonged beyond preischemic values in all preconditioned groups ( p < 0.05). P− and P+ reduced the incidence of fibrillation. P− significantly increased coronary flow (+15%, p = 0.001), whereas IPC and P+ did not. However, IPC and P− significantly decreased systolic function ( p < 0.05) but P+ did not. In addition, IPC depressed diastolic function ( p < 0.05) but P− and P+ did not. Infarct size was reduced by all methods ( p < 0.05). Conclusions. Pinacidil presents a safe and effective alternative to IPC for preserving the heart during regional ischemia. Its coronary vasodilatory effects are safely and effectively reversed by the addition of phenylephrine.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0003-4975
1552-6259
DOI:10.1016/S0003-4975(00)01367-9