Is T Cell Negative Selection a Learning Algorithm?

Our immune system can destroy most cells in our body, an ability that needs to be tightly controlled. To prevent autoimmunity, the thymic medulla exposes developing T cells to normal “self” peptides and prevents any responders from entering the bloodstream. However, a substantial number of self-reac...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCells (Basel, Switzerland) Vol. 9; no. 3; p. 690
Main Authors Wortel, Inge M. N., Keşmir, Can, de Boer, Rob J., Mandl, Judith N., Textor, Johannes
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland MDPI 11.03.2020
MDPI AG
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2073-4409
2073-4409
DOI10.3390/cells9030690

Cover

More Information
Summary:Our immune system can destroy most cells in our body, an ability that needs to be tightly controlled. To prevent autoimmunity, the thymic medulla exposes developing T cells to normal “self” peptides and prevents any responders from entering the bloodstream. However, a substantial number of self-reactive T cells nevertheless reaches the periphery, implying that T cells do not encounter all self peptides during this negative selection process. It is unclear if T cells can still discriminate foreign peptides from self peptides they haven’t encountered during negative selection. We use an “artificial immune system”—a machine learning model of the T cell repertoire—to investigate how negative selection could alter the recognition of self peptides that are absent from the thymus. Our model reveals a surprising new role for T cell cross-reactivity in this context: moderate T cell cross-reactivity should skew the post-selection repertoire towards peptides that differ systematically from self. Moreover, even some self-like foreign peptides can be distinguished provided that the peptides presented in the thymus are not too similar to each other. Thus, our model predicts that negative selection on a well-chosen subset of self peptides would generate a repertoire that tolerates even “unseen” self peptides better than foreign peptides. This effect would resemble a “generalization” process as it is found in learning systems. We discuss potential experimental approaches to test our theory.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2073-4409
2073-4409
DOI:10.3390/cells9030690