Dental anomalies in cleft lip and palate: A case–control comparison of total and outside the cleft prevalence

• Published in: Medicine (Baltimore) Vol. 101; no. 31; p. e29383
• Main Authors: Herrera-Atoche, José Rubén, Huerta-García, Nieves Aime, Escoffié-Ramírez, Mauricio, Aguilar-Pérez, Fernando Javier, Aguilar-Ayala, Fernando Javier, Lizarraga-Colomé, Eduardo Andrés, Colomé-Ruiz, Gabriel Eduardo, Zúñiga-Herrera, Iván Daniel
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 05.08.2022
• Subjects: Cleft Lip - epidemiology; Cleft Palate - epidemiology; Cross-Sectional Studies; Humans; Observational Study; Prevalence; Retrospective Studies; Tooth Abnormalities - epidemiology
• ISSN: 1536-5964; 0025-7974; 1536-5964
• DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029383

This study’s objective was to compare the total and outside the cleft prevalence of dental anomalies (DA) between patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) and a control group. This retrospective cross-sectional study was done under a case–control design. The case group consisted of 192 non-syndromic patients with complete CLP, while the control group included 411 patients. All subjects had orthopantomography, intra, and extraoral photographs. The prevalence of dental agenesis, supernumerary teeth, impacted teeth, dental transposition, and microdontia were compared using a chi-squared test ( P < .05). Next, a second test was made, but only the anomalies outside the cleft were considered for this study. Total prevalence was 89.1% for cases, and 20.9% for controls ( P < .01). The prevalence of each DA was significantly higher for the case group. In the analysis of DAs outside the cleft, the total prevalence was still significantly associated ( P < .01); however, only dental agenesis was statistically significant ( P < .01). Further analysis found that a high rate of upper premolar absence ( P < .01) could explain this event. Patients with CLP have a higher prevalence of DAs compared to controls. After considering only the DAs outside the cleft, the total prevalence remains significantly higher. However, this phenomenon is explained mainly by the elevated prevalence of upper premolars’ agenesis. This study’s results suggest that environmental factors are behind the high prevalence of DAs in subjects with CLP.