Intrapartum Care and Experiences of Women with Midwives Versus Obstetricians in the Listening to Mothers in California Survey
Introduction Many studies based on hospital records or vital statistics have found that childbearing women experience benefits of lower rates of intervention with midwifery care versus obstetric care during labor and birth. Surveys of women's views and experiences can provide a richer analysis...
Saved in:
| Published in | Journal of midwifery & women's health Vol. 65; no. 1; pp. 45 - 55 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
United States
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.01.2020
John Wiley and Sons Inc |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 1526-9523 1542-2011 1542-2011 |
| DOI | 10.1111/jmwh.13027 |
Cover
| Abstract | Introduction
Many studies based on hospital records or vital statistics have found that childbearing women experience benefits of lower rates of intervention with midwifery care versus obstetric care during labor and birth. Surveys of women's views and experiences can provide a richer analysis when comparing intrapartum care of midwives and obstetricians.
Methods
This study was a secondary analysis of data from the population‐based Listening to Mothers in California survey. The sample, which was representative of 2016 California hospital births, was drawn from birth certificate files and oversampled midwife‐attended births. Women responded to the survey in English or Spanish on any device or with a telephone interviewer. The present analysis is based on 1421 of the 2539 participants who identified a midwife or obstetrician as their attendant at a vaginal birth. A bivariate analysis of demographic, attitudinal, and intrapartum variables was conducted. A multivariable model included sociodemographic and attitudinal variables as covariates.
Results
Bivariate analyses found significant socioeconomic differences by type of intrapartum care provider, with women in California attended by midwives more likely to be well educated and privately insured than women attended by obstetricians. Women with midwife birth attendants were less likely to report experiencing various intrapartum medical interventions, less likely to experience pressure to have epidural analgesia, and more likely to report that staff encouraged the woman's decision making. Adjusted odds ratios found that women with midwives were less likely to experience medical interventions, including attempted labor induction; labor augmentation; and use of pain medications, epidural analgesia, and intravenous fluids; and less likely to report pressure to have labor induction or epidural analgesia. Women cared for by midwives were more likely to experience any nonpharmacologic pain relief measures and nitrous oxide and to agree that hospital staff encouraged their decision making.
Discussion
Using women's own reports of their care experiences and adjusting for possible differences in women's attitudes and case mix, we found that midwifery care of women who had vaginal births was associated with reduced use of medical interventions and increased women's decisional latitude during labor and birth. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Many studies based on hospital records or vital statistics have found that childbearing women experience benefits of lower rates of intervention with midwifery care versus obstetric care during labor and birth. Surveys of women's views and experiences can provide a richer analysis when comparing intrapartum care of midwives and obstetricians.INTRODUCTIONMany studies based on hospital records or vital statistics have found that childbearing women experience benefits of lower rates of intervention with midwifery care versus obstetric care during labor and birth. Surveys of women's views and experiences can provide a richer analysis when comparing intrapartum care of midwives and obstetricians.This study was a secondary analysis of data from the population-based Listening to Mothers in California survey. The sample, which was representative of 2016 California hospital births, was drawn from birth certificate files and oversampled midwife-attended births. Women responded to the survey in English or Spanish on any device or with a telephone interviewer. The present analysis is based on 1421 of the 2539 participants who identified a midwife or obstetrician as their attendant at a vaginal birth. A bivariate analysis of demographic, attitudinal, and intrapartum variables was conducted. A multivariable model included sociodemographic and attitudinal variables as covariates.METHODSThis study was a secondary analysis of data from the population-based Listening to Mothers in California survey. The sample, which was representative of 2016 California hospital births, was drawn from birth certificate files and oversampled midwife-attended births. Women responded to the survey in English or Spanish on any device or with a telephone interviewer. The present analysis is based on 1421 of the 2539 participants who identified a midwife or obstetrician as their attendant at a vaginal birth. A bivariate analysis of demographic, attitudinal, and intrapartum variables was conducted. A multivariable model included sociodemographic and attitudinal variables as covariates.Bivariate analyses found significant socioeconomic differences by type of intrapartum care provider, with women in California attended by midwives more likely to be well educated and privately insured than women attended by obstetricians. Women with midwife birth attendants were less likely to report experiencing various intrapartum medical interventions, less likely to experience pressure to have epidural analgesia, and more likely to report that staff encouraged the woman's decision making. Adjusted odds ratios found that women with midwives were less likely to experience medical interventions, including attempted labor induction; labor augmentation; and use of pain medications, epidural analgesia, and intravenous fluids; and less likely to report pressure to have labor induction or epidural analgesia. Women cared for by midwives were more likely to experience any nonpharmacologic pain relief measures and nitrous oxide and to agree that hospital staff encouraged their decision making.RESULTSBivariate analyses found significant socioeconomic differences by type of intrapartum care provider, with women in California attended by midwives more likely to be well educated and privately insured than women attended by obstetricians. Women with midwife birth attendants were less likely to report experiencing various intrapartum medical interventions, less likely to experience pressure to have epidural analgesia, and more likely to report that staff encouraged the woman's decision making. Adjusted odds ratios found that women with midwives were less likely to experience medical interventions, including attempted labor induction; labor augmentation; and use of pain medications, epidural analgesia, and intravenous fluids; and less likely to report pressure to have labor induction or epidural analgesia. Women cared for by midwives were more likely to experience any nonpharmacologic pain relief measures and nitrous oxide and to agree that hospital staff encouraged their decision making.Using women's own reports of their care experiences and adjusting for possible differences in women's attitudes and case mix, we found that midwifery care of women who had vaginal births was associated with reduced use of medical interventions and increased women's decisional latitude during labor and birth.DISCUSSIONUsing women's own reports of their care experiences and adjusting for possible differences in women's attitudes and case mix, we found that midwifery care of women who had vaginal births was associated with reduced use of medical interventions and increased women's decisional latitude during labor and birth. IntroductionMany studies based on hospital records or vital statistics have found that childbearing women experience benefits of lower rates of intervention with midwifery care versus obstetric care during labor and birth. Surveys of women's views and experiences can provide a richer analysis when comparing intrapartum care of midwives and obstetricians.MethodsThis study was a secondary analysis of data from the population‐based Listening to Mothers in California survey. The sample, which was representative of 2016 California hospital births, was drawn from birth certificate files and oversampled midwife‐attended births. Women responded to the survey in English or Spanish on any device or with a telephone interviewer. The present analysis is based on 1421 of the 2539 participants who identified a midwife or obstetrician as their attendant at a vaginal birth. A bivariate analysis of demographic, attitudinal, and intrapartum variables was conducted. A multivariable model included sociodemographic and attitudinal variables as covariates.ResultsBivariate analyses found significant socioeconomic differences by type of intrapartum care provider, with women in California attended by midwives more likely to be well educated and privately insured than women attended by obstetricians. Women with midwife birth attendants were less likely to report experiencing various intrapartum medical interventions, less likely to experience pressure to have epidural analgesia, and more likely to report that staff encouraged the woman's decision making. Adjusted odds ratios found that women with midwives were less likely to experience medical interventions, including attempted labor induction; labor augmentation; and use of pain medications, epidural analgesia, and intravenous fluids; and less likely to report pressure to have labor induction or epidural analgesia. Women cared for by midwives were more likely to experience any nonpharmacologic pain relief measures and nitrous oxide and to agree that hospital staff encouraged their decision making.DiscussionUsing women's own reports of their care experiences and adjusting for possible differences in women's attitudes and case mix, we found that midwifery care of women who had vaginal births was associated with reduced use of medical interventions and increased women's decisional latitude during labor and birth. Introduction Many studies based on hospital records or vital statistics have found that childbearing women experience benefits of lower rates of intervention with midwifery care versus obstetric care during labor and birth. Surveys of women's views and experiences can provide a richer analysis when comparing intrapartum care of midwives and obstetricians. Methods This study was a secondary analysis of data from the population‐based Listening to Mothers in California survey. The sample, which was representative of 2016 California hospital births, was drawn from birth certificate files and oversampled midwife‐attended births. Women responded to the survey in English or Spanish on any device or with a telephone interviewer. The present analysis is based on 1421 of the 2539 participants who identified a midwife or obstetrician as their attendant at a vaginal birth. A bivariate analysis of demographic, attitudinal, and intrapartum variables was conducted. A multivariable model included sociodemographic and attitudinal variables as covariates. Results Bivariate analyses found significant socioeconomic differences by type of intrapartum care provider, with women in California attended by midwives more likely to be well educated and privately insured than women attended by obstetricians. Women with midwife birth attendants were less likely to report experiencing various intrapartum medical interventions, less likely to experience pressure to have epidural analgesia, and more likely to report that staff encouraged the woman's decision making. Adjusted odds ratios found that women with midwives were less likely to experience medical interventions, including attempted labor induction; labor augmentation; and use of pain medications, epidural analgesia, and intravenous fluids; and less likely to report pressure to have labor induction or epidural analgesia. Women cared for by midwives were more likely to experience any nonpharmacologic pain relief measures and nitrous oxide and to agree that hospital staff encouraged their decision making. Discussion Using women's own reports of their care experiences and adjusting for possible differences in women's attitudes and case mix, we found that midwifery care of women who had vaginal births was associated with reduced use of medical interventions and increased women's decisional latitude during labor and birth. Many studies based on hospital records or vital statistics have found that childbearing women experience benefits of lower rates of intervention with midwifery care versus obstetric care during labor and birth. Surveys of women's views and experiences can provide a richer analysis when comparing intrapartum care of midwives and obstetricians. This study was a secondary analysis of data from the population-based Listening to Mothers in California survey. The sample, which was representative of 2016 California hospital births, was drawn from birth certificate files and oversampled midwife-attended births. Women responded to the survey in English or Spanish on any device or with a telephone interviewer. The present analysis is based on 1421 of the 2539 participants who identified a midwife or obstetrician as their attendant at a vaginal birth. A bivariate analysis of demographic, attitudinal, and intrapartum variables was conducted. A multivariable model included sociodemographic and attitudinal variables as covariates. Bivariate analyses found significant socioeconomic differences by type of intrapartum care provider, with women in California attended by midwives more likely to be well educated and privately insured than women attended by obstetricians. Women with midwife birth attendants were less likely to report experiencing various intrapartum medical interventions, less likely to experience pressure to have epidural analgesia, and more likely to report that staff encouraged the woman's decision making. Adjusted odds ratios found that women with midwives were less likely to experience medical interventions, including attempted labor induction; labor augmentation; and use of pain medications, epidural analgesia, and intravenous fluids; and less likely to report pressure to have labor induction or epidural analgesia. Women cared for by midwives were more likely to experience any nonpharmacologic pain relief measures and nitrous oxide and to agree that hospital staff encouraged their decision making. Using women's own reports of their care experiences and adjusting for possible differences in women's attitudes and case mix, we found that midwifery care of women who had vaginal births was associated with reduced use of medical interventions and increased women's decisional latitude during labor and birth. |
| Author | Sakala, Carol Declercq, Eugene R. Belanoff, Candice |
| AuthorAffiliation | 2 National Partnership for Women & Families Washington District of Columbia 1 Department of Community Health Sciences Boston University School of Public Health Boston Massachusetts |
| AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 2 National Partnership for Women & Families Washington District of Columbia – name: 1 Department of Community Health Sciences Boston University School of Public Health Boston Massachusetts |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Eugene R. orcidid: 0000-0001-5411-3033 surname: Declercq fullname: Declercq, Eugene R. organization: Boston University School of Public Health – sequence: 2 givenname: Candice orcidid: 0000-0002-2491-7548 surname: Belanoff fullname: Belanoff, Candice organization: Boston University School of Public Health – sequence: 3 givenname: Carol orcidid: 0000-0002-0006-347X surname: Sakala fullname: Sakala, Carol email: csakala@nationalpartnership.org organization: National Partnership for Women & Families |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31448884$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNp9kU1v1DAQhi1URD_gwg9AlrigSike2_m6IKFVoUW76oGPHi0nmXS9Suytneyyh_53nG6poEL4MtY7z7ya0XtMDqyzSMhrYGcQ3_tVv12egWA8f0aOIJU84QzgYPrzLClTLg7JcQgrxiBnJXtBDgVIWRSFPCJ3l3bweq39MPZ0pj1SbRt6_nON3qCtMVDX0mvXo6VbMyzpwjRbs4nyD_RhDPSqCgMO3tRG20CNpcMS6dxE0Rp7QwdHFy5K_r43051pnbdG06-j3-DuJXne6i7gq4d6Qr5_Ov82u0jmV58vZx_nSR33zJO8kgUrGo5lmstaplhyIQSURdWWummhLusszQU0VZ7JQnAOGaZ5AwyqKkfg4oR82Puux6rHpsbp6E6tvem13ymnjfq7Y81S3biNyhkvGMho8O7BwLvbEcOgehNq7Dpt0Y1B8YilHGSZRvTtE3TlRm_jeYqLVJRpBiVE6s2fGz2u8juZCJzugdq7EDy2jwgwNcWuptjVfewRZk_g2gx6MG66xnT_HoH9yNZ0uPuPufqyuL7Yz_wCr2vAqg |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1186_s12884_024_06448_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wombi_2024_101865 crossref_primary_10_1111_jmwh_13636 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2022_09_044 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_midw_2024_104192 crossref_primary_10_1111_jmwh_13635 crossref_primary_10_1111_jmwh_13511 crossref_primary_10_1111_jmwh_13676 crossref_primary_10_1590_0034_7167_2020_0201 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4625853 crossref_primary_10_1089_heq_2021_0168 crossref_primary_10_1055_a_1925_9972 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0253055 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_socscimed_2025_117720 crossref_primary_10_1080_03630242_2022_2164114 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0282679 crossref_primary_10_31083_j_ceog5101026 crossref_primary_10_1111_jmwh_13685 crossref_primary_10_1111_birt_12677 crossref_primary_10_1111_birt_12531 crossref_primary_10_1111_birt_12773 crossref_primary_10_1111_jmwh_13089 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12884_020_03075_8 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2017.01.003 10.1111/jmwh.12172 10.1111/birt.12334 10.1080/03630242.2011.560999 10.1097/00001648-199911000-00022 10.1371/journal.pone.0192523 10.1007/s10995-015-1671-8 10.1111/birt.12406 10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00304-1 10.1016/j.whi.2011.06.005 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60789-3 10.1177/1049732312440330 10.1111/jmwh.12003 10.1111/jmwh.12702 10.1136/jech.52.5.310 10.1111/jmwh.12750 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002128 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2011.00475.x 10.1023/A:1022996924094 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2012.00171.x 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01580.x |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2019 The Authors. The Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc., on behalf of the American College of Nurse‐Midwives 2019 The Authors. The Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc., on behalf of the American College of Nurse-Midwives. 2019. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2019 The Authors. The Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc., on behalf of the American College of Nurse‐Midwives – notice: 2019 The Authors. The Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc., on behalf of the American College of Nurse-Midwives. – notice: 2019. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
| DBID | 24P AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QJ ASE FPQ K6X NAPCQ 7X8 5PM |
| DOI | 10.1111/jmwh.13027 |
| DatabaseName | Wiley Online Library Open Access CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) British Nursing Index British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present) British Nursing Index Nursing & Allied Health Premium MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Nursing & Allied Health Premium British Nursing Index Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic Nursing & Allied Health Premium MEDLINE |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: 24P name: Wiley Online Library Open Access url: https://authorservices.wiley.com/open-science/open-access/browse-journals.html sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine Nursing |
| EISSN | 1542-2011 |
| EndPage | 55 |
| ExternalDocumentID | PMC7028014 31448884 10_1111_jmwh_13027 JMWH13027 |
| Genre | article Journal Article |
| GeographicLocations | California United States--US |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: California – name: United States--US |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: California Health Care Foundation funderid: 19555 – fundername: Yellow Chair Foundation funderid: 2016‐17073 – fundername: Yellow Chair Foundation grantid: 2016-17073 – fundername: California Health Care Foundation grantid: 19555 – fundername: Yellow Chair Foundation grantid: 2016‐17073 – fundername: ; grantid: 19555 |
| GroupedDBID | --- --K .-4 .3N .GA .GJ 05W 0R~ 1B1 1OC 1RT 1~5 24P 29L 2KS 31~ 33P 3SF 4.4 4G. 50Y 50Z 52M 52O 52T 52U 52V 52W 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 7-5 702 71M 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 85S 930 A01 A03 AAEDT AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AAHQN AAIPD AALRI AAMNL AANHP AANLZ AAONW AAQOH AAQQT AAQXK AASGY AAWTL AAXRX AAXUO AAYCA AAYJJ AAZKR ABCUV ABIVO ABMAC ABOCM ABPVW ABQWH ABWVN ABXGK ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACFBH ACGFS ACGOF ACHQT ACIUM ACMXC ACNCT ACPOU ACRPL ACXBN ACXQS ACYXJ ADBBV ADBTR ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADMUD ADNMO ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN AEEZP AEIGN AEIMD AEKER AENEX AEQDE AEUQT AEUYR AFBPY AFFPM AFGKR AFPWT AFWVQ AHBTC AIACR AITUG AITYG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE AKRWK ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB ATUGU AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMXJE BROTX BRXPI C45 D-6 D-7 D-E D-F DCZOG DPXWK DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DU5 EBS EIHBH EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 EX3 F00 F01 F04 F1Z F21 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FNPLU FUBAC G-Q G-S G.N GODZA H.X HF~ HGLYW HVGLF HZ~ IHE KBYEO LATKE LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES M41 MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM MY~ N04 N05 NEJ NF~ NNB NQ- O66 O9- OHT OMK OVD OZT P2P P2W P2X P2Z P4B P4D PQQKQ Q.N QB0 R.K R2- RIG RJQFR ROL RPZ RX1 SDG SDP SNC SND SSZ SUPJJ TEORI UB1 UHS UKR VQP W8V W99 WBKPD WEIWN WHWMO WIH WIJ WIK WOHZO WOW WRC WXSBR X7L XPP YYQ YZZ ZGI ZHY ZUP ZZTAW ~IA ~WT AAFWJ AAYXX ACVFH ADCNI AEUPX AEYWJ AFPUW AGHNM AGQPQ AGYGG AIGII AKBMS AKYEP CITATION AAMMB AEFGJ AGXDD AIDQK AIDYY CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 1OB 7QJ ASE FPQ K6X NAPCQ 7X8 5PM |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c4487-7b4808d2e9574c45e92333198bf9adf1c9c65731db764832216e57d101bb7e123 |
| IEDL.DBID | 24P |
| ISSN | 1526-9523 1542-2011 |
| IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 14:28:41 EDT 2025 Thu Sep 04 21:55:56 EDT 2025 Wed Aug 13 06:34:58 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:08:36 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:47:27 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:09:29 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:36:42 EST 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 1 |
| Keywords | nurse-midwives certified nurse-midwives mothers midwifery obstetrician intrapartum care California midwives obstetrics surveys and questionnaires parturition |
| Language | English |
| License | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2019 The Authors. The Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc., on behalf of the American College of Nurse-Midwives. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4487-7b4808d2e9574c45e92333198bf9adf1c9c65731db764832216e57d101bb7e123 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-2491-7548 0000-0001-5411-3033 0000-0002-0006-347X |
| OpenAccessLink | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fjmwh.13027 |
| PMID | 31448884 |
| PQID | 2353956191 |
| PQPubID | 46764 |
| PageCount | 11 |
| ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7028014 proquest_miscellaneous_2280521495 proquest_journals_2353956191 pubmed_primary_31448884 crossref_primary_10_1111_jmwh_13027 crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_jmwh_13027 wiley_primary_10_1111_jmwh_13027_JMWH13027 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | January/February 2020 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-01-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 01 year: 2020 text: January/February 2020 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: New York – name: Hoboken |
| PublicationTitle | Journal of midwifery & women's health |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | J Midwifery Womens Health |
| PublicationYear | 2020 |
| Publisher | Wiley Subscription Services, Inc John Wiley and Sons Inc |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc – name: John Wiley and Sons Inc |
| References | 2013; 58 2015; 19 2019; 46 2011; 51 2014; 59 2018 1999; 10 2018; 63 2016 2008; 115 1998; 2 2017; 130 1998; 52 2018; 45 2012; 57 2011; 38 1998; 51 2012; 22 2014; 384 2017; 105 2018; 13 e_1_2_7_6_1 Neal JL (e_1_2_7_2_1) e_1_2_7_4_1 e_1_2_7_8_1 e_1_2_7_7_1 e_1_2_7_19_1 e_1_2_7_18_1 e_1_2_7_17_1 e_1_2_7_16_1 e_1_2_7_15_1 e_1_2_7_14_1 e_1_2_7_13_1 e_1_2_7_12_1 e_1_2_7_11_1 e_1_2_7_10_1 e_1_2_7_26_1 Carlson NS (e_1_2_7_3_1) Sakala C (e_1_2_7_9_1) 2018 e_1_2_7_25_1 e_1_2_7_24_1 e_1_2_7_23_1 e_1_2_7_22_1 e_1_2_7_21_1 e_1_2_7_20_1 Sandall J (e_1_2_7_5_1) 2016 |
| References_xml | – article-title: Midwifery presence in United States medical centers and labor care and birth outcomes among low‐risk nulliparous women: a Consortium on Safe Labor study publication-title: Birth – volume: 19 start-page: 1608 issue: 7 year: 2015 end-page: 1615 article-title: Midwifery care and patient‐provider communication in maternity decisions in the United States publication-title: Matern Child Health J – volume: 105 start-page: 11 year: 2017 end-page: 15 article-title: Concordance between maternal recall of birth complications and data from obstetrical records publication-title: Early Hum Dev – volume: 58 start-page: 3 issue: 1 year: 2013 end-page: 14 article-title: Outcomes of care in birth centers: demonstration of a durable model publication-title: J Midwifery Womens Health – volume: 13 issue: 2 year: 2018 article-title: Mapping integration of midwives across the United States: impact on access, equity, and outcomes publication-title: PloS One – volume: 22 start-page: 897 issue: 7 year: 2012 end-page: 910 article-title: A metasynthesis of midwife‐led care publication-title: Qual Health Res – volume: 59 start-page: 17 issue: 1 year: 2014 end-page: 27 article-title: Outcomes of care for 16,924 planned home births in the United States: the Midwives Alliance of North America Statistics Project, 2004 to 2009 publication-title: J Midwifery Womens Health – volume: 115 start-page: 570 issue: 5 year: 2008 end-page: 578 article-title: Evaluation of 280,000 cases in Dutch midwifery practices: a descriptive study publication-title: BJOG – issue: 4 year: 2016 article-title: Midwife‐led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev – volume: 10 start-page: 774 issue: 6 year: 1999 end-page: 777 article-title: Reproducibility and validity of maternal recall of pregnancy‐related events publication-title: Epidemiology – volume: 46 start-page: 300 issue: 2 year: 2019 end-page: 310 article-title: Measuring labor and delivery unit culture and clinicians’ attitudes toward birth: revision and validation of the Labor Culture Survey publication-title: Birth – volume: 57 start-page: 433 issue: 5 year: 2012 end-page: 438 article-title: Recent trends in clinicians providing care to pregnant women in the United States publication-title: J Midwifery Womens Health – year: 2018 – volume: 384 start-page: 1129 issue: 9948 year: 2014 end-page: 1145 article-title: Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence‐informed framework for maternal and newborn care publication-title: Lancet – volume: 38 start-page: 216 issue: 3 year: 2011 end-page: 227 article-title: Posttraumatic stress disorder in new mothers: results from a two‐stage U.S. national survey publication-title: Birth – volume: 52 start-page: 310 issue: 5 year: 1998 end-page: 317 article-title: Midwifery care, social and medical risk factors, and birth outcomes in the USA publication-title: J Epidemiol Community Health – article-title: Influence of midwifery presence in United States centers on labor care and outcomes of low‐risk parous women: a Consortium on Safe Labor study publication-title: Birth – volume: 130 start-page: 358 issue: 2 year: 2017 end-page: 365 article-title: Relationship between labor and delivery unit management practices and maternal outcomes publication-title: Obstet Gynecol – volume: 2 start-page: 123 issue: 2 year: 1998 end-page: 126 article-title: Maternal reporting of prepregnancy weight and birth outcome: consistency and completeness compared with the clinical record publication-title: Matern Child Health J – volume: 22 start-page: e73 issue: 1 year: 2012 end-page: e81 article-title: Comparison of labor and delivery care provided by certified nurse‐midwives and physicians: a systematic review, 1990 to 2008 publication-title: Womens Health Issues – volume: 51 start-page: 399 issue: 5 year: 1998 end-page: 405 article-title: Maternal recall of distant pregnancy events publication-title: J Clin Epidemiol – volume: 63 start-page: 14 issue: 1 year: 2018 end-page: 22 article-title: Relationship between hospital‐level percentage of midwife‐attended births and obstetric procedure utilization publication-title: J Midwifery Womens Health – volume: 45 start-page: 159 issue: 2 year: 2018 end-page: 168 article-title: Association between provider type and cesarean birth in healthy nulliparous laboring women: a retrospective cohort study publication-title: Birth – volume: 63 start-page: 399 issue: 4 year: 2018 end-page: 409 article-title: Birth outcomes of women using a midwife versus women using a physician for prenatal care publication-title: J Midwifery Womens Health – volume: 51 start-page: 220 issue: 3 year: 2011 end-page: 239 article-title: Pregnant women's fear of childbirth in midwife‐ and obstetrician‐led care in Belgium and the Netherlands: test of the medicalization hypothesis publication-title: Women Health – ident: e_1_2_7_19_1 doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2017.01.003 – ident: e_1_2_7_2_1 article-title: Midwifery presence in United States medical centers and labor care and birth outcomes among low‐risk nulliparous women: a Consortium on Safe Labor study publication-title: Birth – ident: e_1_2_7_24_1 doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12172 – ident: e_1_2_7_26_1 doi: 10.1111/birt.12334 – ident: e_1_2_7_8_1 doi: 10.1080/03630242.2011.560999 – ident: e_1_2_7_16_1 doi: 10.1097/00001648-199911000-00022 – ident: e_1_2_7_25_1 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192523 – ident: e_1_2_7_13_1 doi: 10.1007/s10995-015-1671-8 – ident: e_1_2_7_22_1 doi: 10.1111/birt.12406 – ident: e_1_2_7_17_1 doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00304-1 – ident: e_1_2_7_6_1 doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2011.06.005 – ident: e_1_2_7_7_1 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60789-3 – ident: e_1_2_7_23_1 doi: 10.1177/1049732312440330 – ident: e_1_2_7_20_1 doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12003 – ident: e_1_2_7_11_1 doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12702 – ident: e_1_2_7_10_1 doi: 10.1136/jech.52.5.310 – ident: e_1_2_7_4_1 doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12750 – ident: e_1_2_7_21_1 doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002128 – ident: e_1_2_7_15_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2011.00475.x – ident: e_1_2_7_18_1 doi: 10.1023/A:1022996924094 – ident: e_1_2_7_12_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2012.00171.x – ident: e_1_2_7_3_1 article-title: Influence of midwifery presence in United States centers on labor care and outcomes of low‐risk parous women: a Consortium on Safe Labor study publication-title: Birth – start-page: CD004667 issue: 4 year: 2016 ident: e_1_2_7_5_1 article-title: Midwife‐led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev – volume-title: Listening to Mothers in California: A Population‐Based Survey of Women's Childbearing Experiences, Full Survey Report year: 2018 ident: e_1_2_7_9_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_14_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01580.x |
| SSID | ssj0017090 |
| Score | 2.3319123 |
| Snippet | Introduction
Many studies based on hospital records or vital statistics have found that childbearing women experience benefits of lower rates of intervention... Many studies based on hospital records or vital statistics have found that childbearing women experience benefits of lower rates of intervention with midwifery... IntroductionMany studies based on hospital records or vital statistics have found that childbearing women experience benefits of lower rates of intervention... |
| SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref wiley |
| SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 45 |
| SubjectTerms | Analgesia Analysis Assistants Attended births Attitudes Birth certificates Births California certified nurse‐midwives Cesarean Section - nursing Cesarean Section - psychology Childbearing Childbirth & labor Clinical decision making Decision Making Epidural Female Health insurance Humans Induced labor Induction Intervention intrapartum care Labor Stage, Third Listening Medical personnel Midwifery Midwifery - methods Midwives Mothers Mothers - psychology Nitrous oxide Nurse-Patient Relations nurse‐midwives Obstetric Labor Complications - prevention & control obstetrician Obstetricians obstetrics Original Research Original Research and Reviews Pain parturition Perinatal Care - methods Polls & surveys Practice Patterns, Nurses' - organization & administration Pregnancy Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology Pregnancy Outcome - psychology Socioeconomic factors surveys and questionnaires Vaginal birth Women Womens health |
| Title | Intrapartum Care and Experiences of Women with Midwives Versus Obstetricians in the Listening to Mothers in California Survey |
| URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fjmwh.13027 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31448884 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2353956191 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2280521495 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7028014 |
| Volume | 65 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3da9RAEB9qi-JLqfUrtZYVfVGIZJPdbBb6UorlbI2KWtq3kP04emBzpblYfPB_78xeLu1REXwL7OSDzEzmNzOZ3wK8yXWaWGV0bGWdxhghkrjmxsYasZHWirvaUGmg_JyPjsXhqTxdgd3FLMycH2IouJFnhO81OXht2ttOfn519j603e7BGqL6jOw7FV-HHoJKQoUFA1Qea8y3enLS8B_PcO5yOLqDMe_-KnkbwoYYdLAB6z14ZHtzbT-CFd9swoOyb49vwv0-938Mfz7ShS7QLrpzRjNGrG4cu-E1btl0zMLulYwqsaycuCsioGVUP-ta9sWg9om8H62nZZOGIU5kn8gkqI7CZlNWhtGtsHYz38W-d5e__O8ncHzw4cf-KO53WogtpmcqVkYUSeFSr6USVkiPsC9D5yzMWNduzK22uVQZd0blgr4BPPdSOXRnY5TH4PcUVptp458Dw_SJJ0YgZvdKjJ00teTWeeEsat34PIK3ixde2Z6GnHbD-FkN6QgqpwrKieD1IHsxJ9_4q9T2Qm9V74BtlWYyo5ldzSN4NSyj61A_pG78tEOZNOzngCliBM_mah5uk2GiWRSFiEAtGcAgQLTcyyvN5CzQcyvqVnM8810wlX88eXVYnozC0db_CL-Ahyll_aEQtA2rs8vOv0RoNDM7wQN2YG3v6NvJ0TWguQ0h |
| linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3dS9xAEB-s0o8XUfuVauuW9qWFlGyym80-ilROvWihSn0L2Y_Dg5oT71LpQ__3zuzF6GER-nawk-TIzGRmfrPzW4CPuU4Tq4yOrazTGCNEEtfc2FhjbqS14q42BA2UR_ngVBycybNubw7Nwsz5IXrAjTwjfK_JwQmQvuvlF9fnX0Lf7RGsiBxrFyJ2Ft_6JoJKAsSCESqPNRZcHTtp2MjTX7sYj-4lmff3St7NYUMQ2luD1S57ZDtzda_Dkm824EnZ9cc34HFX_D-HP_t0o0s0jPaC0ZARqxvHbomNp2wyYuH4SkZQLCvH7poYaBkBaO2UHRtUP7H3o_lM2bhhmCiyIdkEASlsNmFlmN0Ka7cDXux7e_XL_34Bp3tfT3YHcXfUQmyxPlOxMqJICpd6LZWwQnrM-zL0zsKMdO1G3GqbS5VxZ1Qu6CPAcy-VQ382RnmMfi9huZk0_jUwrJ94YgQm7V6JkZOmltw6L5xFtRufR_Dp5oVXtuMhp-MwflZ9PYLKqYJyIvjQy17O2Tf-KbV1o7eq88BplWYyo6FdzSN43y-j71BDpG78pEWZNBzogDViBK_mau4fk2GlWRSFiEAtGEAvQLzciyvN-DzwcytqV3O88nMwlQf-eXVQ_hiEX2_-R3gbng5OymE13D863IRnKUEAARXaguXZVevfYp40M--CN_wFlKkO5A |
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3da9RAEB9qxeKLaP2KVl3RF4WUbLKbzYIvoh7X2tSCFvsWsh-hBzZ39C4WH_zfndnLpT0qgm-BnU1CZibztfMbgNe5ThOrjI6trNMYLUQS19zYWKNvpLXirjaUGigP8_Gx2D-RJxvwbtULs8SHGBJupBnhf00KPnPNVSU_uzjdDWW3G3BToOCRfKfiaKghqCRkWNBA5bHGeKsHJw3neIa96-bomo95_ajkVRc22KDRXbjTO4_s_ZLb92DDt9uwVfbl8W241cf-9-H3Ht1ohnLRnTHqMWJ169glrvGcTRsWplcyysSycuIuCICWUf6sm7MvBrlP4P0oPXM2aRn6ieyARILyKGwxZWVo3Qprl_1d7Gt3_tP_egDHo0_fPozjftJCbDE8U7EyokgKl3otlbBCenT7MlTOwjS6dg232uZSZdwZlQv6B_DcS-VQnY1RHo3fQ9hsp61_DAzDJ54YgT67V6Jx0tSSW-eFs8h14_MI3qw-eGV7GHKahvGjGsIRZE4VmBPBq4F2tgTf-CvVzopvVa-A8yrNZEY9u5pH8HJYRtWhekjd-mmHNGmY54AhYgSPlmweHpNhoFkUhYhArQnAQECw3Osr7eQ0wHMrqlZz3Pk2iMo_3rzaL7-Pw9WT_yF-AVtHH0fVwd7h56dwO6UEQMgJ7cDm4rzzz9BLWpjnQRn-ABOEDh8 |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intrapartum+Care+and+Experiences+of+Women+with+Midwives+Versus+Obstetricians+in+the+Listening+to+Mothers+in+California+Survey&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+midwifery+%26+women%27s+health&rft.au=Declercq%2C+Eugene+R.&rft.au=Belanoff%2C+Candice&rft.au=Sakala%2C+Carol&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.pub=John+Wiley+and+Sons+Inc&rft.issn=1526-9523&rft.eissn=1542-2011&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=45&rft.epage=55&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fjmwh.13027&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F31448884&rft.externalDocID=PMC7028014 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1526-9523&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1526-9523&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1526-9523&client=summon |