How Do Executive Functions Influence Children’s Reasoning About Counterintuitive Concepts in Mathematics and Science?
Many scientific and mathematical concepts are counterintuitive because they conflict with misleading perceptual cues or incorrect naive theories that we build from our everyday experiences of the world. Executive functions (EFs) influence mathematics and science achievement, and inhibitory control (...
Saved in:
| Published in | Journal of cognitive enhancement Vol. 7; no. 3-4; pp. 257 - 275 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Cham
Springer International Publishing
01.12.2023
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 2509-3290 2509-3304 2509-3304 |
| DOI | 10.1007/s41465-023-00271-0 |
Cover
| Abstract | Many scientific and mathematical concepts are counterintuitive because they conflict with misleading perceptual cues or incorrect naive theories that we build from our everyday experiences of the world. Executive functions (EFs) influence mathematics and science achievement, and inhibitory control (IC), in particular, might facilitate counterintuitive reasoning. Stop & Think (S&T) is a computerised learning activity that trains IC skills. It has been found effective in improving primary children’s mathematics and science academic performance in a large scale RCT trial (Palak et al.,
2019
; Wilkinson et al.,
Journal of Cognitive Enhancement
,
4
, 296–314,
2020
). The current study aimed to investigate the role of EFs and the moderating effects of S&T training on counterintuitive mathematics and science reasoning. A sample of 372 children in school Years 3 (7- to 8-year-olds) and 5 (9- to 10-year-olds) were allocated to S&T, active control or teaching as usual conditions, and completed tasks assessing verbal and visuospatial working memory (WM), IC, IQ, and counterintuitive reasoning, before and after training. Cross-sectional associations between counterintuitive reasoning and EF were found in Year 5 children, with evidence of a specific role of verbal WM. The intervention benefited counterintuitive reasoning in Year 3 children only and EF measures were not found to predict which children would most benefit from the intervention. Combined with previous research, these results suggest that individual differences in EF play a lesser role in counterintuitive reasoning in younger children, while older children show a greater association between EFs and counterintuitive reasoning and are able to apply the strategies developed during the S&T training to mathematics and science subjects. This work contributes to understanding why specifically the S&T intervention is effective. This work was preregistered with the ISRCTN registry (TRN: 54726482) on 10/10/2017. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Many scientific and mathematical concepts are counterintuitive because they conflict with misleading perceptual cues or incorrect naive theories that we build from our everyday experiences of the world. Executive functions (EFs) influence mathematics and science achievement, and inhibitory control (IC), in particular, might facilitate counterintuitive reasoning. Stop & Think (S&T) is a computerised learning activity that trains IC skills. It has been found effective in improving primary children’s mathematics and science academic performance in a large scale RCT trial (Palak et al., 2019; Wilkinson et al.,
Journal of Cognitive Enhancement
,
4
, 296–314, 2020). The current study aimed to investigate the role of EFs and the moderating effects of S&T training on counterintuitive mathematics and science reasoning. A sample of 372 children in school Years 3 (7- to 8-year-olds) and 5 (9- to 10-year-olds) were allocated to S&T, active control or teaching as usual conditions, and completed tasks assessing verbal and visuospatial working memory (WM), IC, IQ, and counterintuitive reasoning, before and after training. Cross-sectional associations between counterintuitive reasoning and EF were found in Year 5 children, with evidence of a specific role of verbal WM. The intervention benefited counterintuitive reasoning in Year 3 children only and EF measures were not found to predict which children would most benefit from the intervention. Combined with previous research, these results suggest that individual differences in EF play a lesser role in counterintuitive reasoning in younger children, while older children show a greater association between EFs and counterintuitive reasoning and are able to apply the strategies developed during the S&T training to mathematics and science subjects. This work contributes to understanding why specifically the S&T intervention is effective. This work was preregistered with the ISRCTN registry (TRN: 54726482) on 10/10/2017. Many scientific and mathematical concepts are counterintuitive because they conflict with misleading perceptual cues or incorrect naive theories that we build from our everyday experiences of the world. Executive functions (EFs) influence mathematics and science achievement, and inhibitory control (IC), in particular, might facilitate counterintuitive reasoning. Stop & Think (S&T) is a computerised learning activity that trains IC skills. It has been found effective in improving primary children's mathematics and science academic performance in a large scale RCT trial (Palak et al., 2019; Wilkinson et al., , , 296-314, 2020). The current study aimed to investigate the role of EFs and the moderating effects of S&T training on counterintuitive mathematics and science reasoning. A sample of 372 children in school Years 3 (7- to 8-year-olds) and 5 (9- to 10-year-olds) were allocated to S&T, active control or teaching as usual conditions, and completed tasks assessing verbal and visuospatial working memory (WM), IC, IQ, and counterintuitive reasoning, before and after training. Cross-sectional associations between counterintuitive reasoning and EF were found in Year 5 children, with evidence of a specific role of verbal WM. The intervention benefited counterintuitive reasoning in Year 3 children only and EF measures were not found to predict which children would most benefit from the intervention. Combined with previous research, these results suggest that individual differences in EF play a lesser role in counterintuitive reasoning in younger children, while older children show a greater association between EFs and counterintuitive reasoning and are able to apply the strategies developed during the S&T training to mathematics and science subjects. This work contributes to understanding why specifically the S&T intervention is effective. This work was preregistered with the ISRCTN registry (TRN: 54726482) on 10/10/2017. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41465-023-00271-0. Many scientific and mathematical concepts are counterintuitive because they conflict with misleading perceptual cues or incorrect naive theories that we build from our everyday experiences of the world. Executive functions (EFs) influence mathematics and science achievement, and inhibitory control (IC), in particular, might facilitate counterintuitive reasoning. Stop & Think (S&T) is a computerised learning activity that trains IC skills. It has been found effective in improving primary children's mathematics and science academic performance in a large scale RCT trial (Palak et al., 2019; Wilkinson et al., Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 4, 296-314, 2020). The current study aimed to investigate the role of EFs and the moderating effects of S&T training on counterintuitive mathematics and science reasoning. A sample of 372 children in school Years 3 (7- to 8-year-olds) and 5 (9- to 10-year-olds) were allocated to S&T, active control or teaching as usual conditions, and completed tasks assessing verbal and visuospatial working memory (WM), IC, IQ, and counterintuitive reasoning, before and after training. Cross-sectional associations between counterintuitive reasoning and EF were found in Year 5 children, with evidence of a specific role of verbal WM. The intervention benefited counterintuitive reasoning in Year 3 children only and EF measures were not found to predict which children would most benefit from the intervention. Combined with previous research, these results suggest that individual differences in EF play a lesser role in counterintuitive reasoning in younger children, while older children show a greater association between EFs and counterintuitive reasoning and are able to apply the strategies developed during the S&T training to mathematics and science subjects. This work contributes to understanding why specifically the S&T intervention is effective. This work was preregistered with the ISRCTN registry (TRN: 54726482) on 10/10/2017.Many scientific and mathematical concepts are counterintuitive because they conflict with misleading perceptual cues or incorrect naive theories that we build from our everyday experiences of the world. Executive functions (EFs) influence mathematics and science achievement, and inhibitory control (IC), in particular, might facilitate counterintuitive reasoning. Stop & Think (S&T) is a computerised learning activity that trains IC skills. It has been found effective in improving primary children's mathematics and science academic performance in a large scale RCT trial (Palak et al., 2019; Wilkinson et al., Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 4, 296-314, 2020). The current study aimed to investigate the role of EFs and the moderating effects of S&T training on counterintuitive mathematics and science reasoning. A sample of 372 children in school Years 3 (7- to 8-year-olds) and 5 (9- to 10-year-olds) were allocated to S&T, active control or teaching as usual conditions, and completed tasks assessing verbal and visuospatial working memory (WM), IC, IQ, and counterintuitive reasoning, before and after training. Cross-sectional associations between counterintuitive reasoning and EF were found in Year 5 children, with evidence of a specific role of verbal WM. The intervention benefited counterintuitive reasoning in Year 3 children only and EF measures were not found to predict which children would most benefit from the intervention. Combined with previous research, these results suggest that individual differences in EF play a lesser role in counterintuitive reasoning in younger children, while older children show a greater association between EFs and counterintuitive reasoning and are able to apply the strategies developed during the S&T training to mathematics and science subjects. This work contributes to understanding why specifically the S&T intervention is effective. This work was preregistered with the ISRCTN registry (TRN: 54726482) on 10/10/2017.The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41465-023-00271-0.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41465-023-00271-0. Many scientific and mathematical concepts are counterintuitive because they conflict with misleading perceptual cues or incorrect naive theories that we build from our everyday experiences of the world. Executive functions (EFs) influence mathematics and science achievement, and inhibitory control (IC), in particular, might facilitate counterintuitive reasoning. Stop & Think (S&T) is a computerised learning activity that trains IC skills. It has been found effective in improving primary children’s mathematics and science academic performance in a large scale RCT trial (Palak et al., 2019 ; Wilkinson et al., Journal of Cognitive Enhancement , 4 , 296–314, 2020 ). The current study aimed to investigate the role of EFs and the moderating effects of S&T training on counterintuitive mathematics and science reasoning. A sample of 372 children in school Years 3 (7- to 8-year-olds) and 5 (9- to 10-year-olds) were allocated to S&T, active control or teaching as usual conditions, and completed tasks assessing verbal and visuospatial working memory (WM), IC, IQ, and counterintuitive reasoning, before and after training. Cross-sectional associations between counterintuitive reasoning and EF were found in Year 5 children, with evidence of a specific role of verbal WM. The intervention benefited counterintuitive reasoning in Year 3 children only and EF measures were not found to predict which children would most benefit from the intervention. Combined with previous research, these results suggest that individual differences in EF play a lesser role in counterintuitive reasoning in younger children, while older children show a greater association between EFs and counterintuitive reasoning and are able to apply the strategies developed during the S&T training to mathematics and science subjects. This work contributes to understanding why specifically the S&T intervention is effective. This work was preregistered with the ISRCTN registry (TRN: 54726482) on 10/10/2017. |
| Author | Wilkinson, Hannah R. Farran, Emily K. Mareschal, Denis Modhvadia, Roshni Dumontheil, Iroise Smid, Claire |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Iroise surname: Dumontheil fullname: Dumontheil, Iroise organization: Centre for Educational Neuroscience, Birkbeck, University of London, Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck College, University of London – sequence: 2 givenname: Hannah R. surname: Wilkinson fullname: Wilkinson, Hannah R. organization: Centre for Educational Neuroscience, Birkbeck, University of London, Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck College, University of London – sequence: 3 givenname: Emily K. surname: Farran fullname: Farran, Emily K. organization: Centre for Educational Neuroscience, Birkbeck, University of London, School of Psychology, University of Surrey – sequence: 4 givenname: Claire surname: Smid fullname: Smid, Claire organization: Centre for Educational Neuroscience, Birkbeck, University of London, Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London – sequence: 5 givenname: Roshni surname: Modhvadia fullname: Modhvadia, Roshni organization: Centre for Educational Neuroscience, Birkbeck, University of London, School of Psychology, University of Surrey – sequence: 6 givenname: Denis orcidid: 0000-0002-9828-9548 surname: Mareschal fullname: Mareschal, Denis email: d.mareschal@bbk.ac.uk organization: Centre for Educational Neuroscience, Birkbeck, University of London, Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck College, University of London |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38186609$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNp9kc1u1DAUhS1UREvpC7BAXrIJXDsZx1lVVWhppSIkftaW49zMuMrYg39a2PEavB5PgqfTVsCiK1u-53zHuuc52XPeISEvGbxhAO3b2LBGLCrgdQXAW1bBE3LAF9BVdQ3N3v2dd7BPjmK8AgDWMdFA94zs15JJIaA7IDfn_oa-8_T0O5qc7DXSs-xMst5FeuGmOaMzSPuVnceA7vfPX5F-Qh29s25JTwafE-19dgmDdSnbW0Lvi2eTIrWOftBphWudrIlUu5F-NnZLPH5Bnk56jnh0dx6Sr2enX_rz6vLj-4v-5LIyTdOmajKcyQGFZAwR9TS1XAgmAbtamgHatpbYwggT44NZiHHqBsHLoLwMhjemPiTHO-4mD2scDboU9Kw2wa51-KG8turfibMrtfTXihU48AUvhNd3hOC_ZYxJrW00OM_aoc9R8Y4x2chatEX66u-wh5T7dRcB3wlM8DEGnB4kDNS2VrWrVZVa1W2tCopJ_mcyNultReXDdn7cWu-sseS4JQZ15XNwZeGPuf4ApGq6Ow |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jecp_2024_106144 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11191_024_00610_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neurenf_2024_11_008 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01019.x 10.1016/j.dcn.2016.06.004 10.1007/978-3-319-03161-3_34 10.1126/science.1204529 10.1145/3485168 10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105662 10.1177/0734282912467756 10.1080/02635140120046240 10.1016/j.tine.2015.03.001 10.1371/journal.pone.0198973 10.1111/mbe.12212 10.1080/0140528810304004 10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.06.001 10.1007/978-1-4419-8065-6_9 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3564-13.2014 10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00081 10.3758/BF03203619 10.1163/9789460910623 10.1162/089892900562525 10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.002 10.1111/cdep.12059 10.1002/1098-2736(200012)37:10<1171::AID-TEA8>3.0.CO;2-A 10.1016/j.edurev.2013.05.003 10.3758/BF03207704 10.1007/978-94-007-6991-5_6 10.1111/bjep.12119 10.1016/j.tine.2013.12.001 10.1037/0012-1649.38.3.352 10.1177/2372732216654718 10.4135/9781446269121 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781 10.4324/9780203453728 10.1016/j.dcn.2015.11.005 10.1016/j.lindif.2018.11.012 10.1016/j.lindif.2009.01.004 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.07.005 10.1207/s15326942dn2601_6 10.1111/mbe.12214 10.1111/bjdp.12129 10.1111/cogs.12624 10.1111/cogs.12126 10.3102/0034654314561338 10.1093/cercor/bhr175 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200001)37:1<44::AIDTEA4>3.0.CO;2-J 10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3 10.1037/a0014345 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.01.014 10.1080/095006999290642 10.1038/s41539-018-0026-9 10.1177/0963721420951599 10.1037/0033-2909.126.2.220 10.1027/1618-3169.53.1.123 10.1038/s41592-019-0470-3 10.1007/BF00869953 10.1080/17470210500162854 10.1007/s11858-014-0659-y 10.1002/icd.1823 10.1002/sce.3730760209 10.1111/jcpp.12973 10.1007/s41465-019-00161-4 10.1111/mbe.12043 10.1016/j.ijcci.2022.100503 10.1207/S15326942DN1903_3 10.1086/230638 10.1037/0012-1649.43.2.417 10.1111/desc.12786 10.1145/3271484 10.1111/bjep.12211 10.1016/S0193-3973(99)00046-5 10.3389/feduc.2020.542458 10.1111/desc.12144 10.1007/s41465-018-0115-y1-28 10.3758/s13423-010-0034-0 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.06.007 10.1037/edu0000090 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Contributor | Gauthier, Andrea Holmes, Wayne Mayer, Sveta Tolmie, Andy Thomas, Michael de Jong, Roos Brookman-Byrne, Annie Morris, Su Porayska-Pomsta, Kaśka Bell, Derek Sumanapala, Dilini |
| Contributor_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Derek surname: Bell fullname: Bell, Derek – sequence: 2 givenname: Annie surname: Brookman-Byrne fullname: Brookman-Byrne, Annie – sequence: 3 givenname: Andrea surname: Gauthier fullname: Gauthier, Andrea – sequence: 4 givenname: Roos surname: de Jong fullname: de Jong, Roos – sequence: 5 givenname: Wayne surname: Holmes fullname: Holmes, Wayne – sequence: 6 givenname: Sveta surname: Mayer fullname: Mayer, Sveta – sequence: 7 givenname: Su surname: Morris fullname: Morris, Su – sequence: 8 givenname: Kaśka surname: Porayska-Pomsta fullname: Porayska-Pomsta, Kaśka – sequence: 9 givenname: Dilini surname: Sumanapala fullname: Sumanapala, Dilini – sequence: 10 givenname: Michael surname: Thomas fullname: Thomas, Michael – sequence: 11 givenname: Andy surname: Tolmie fullname: Tolmie, Andy |
| Copyright | The Author(s) 2023 The Author(s) 2023. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s) 2023 – notice: The Author(s) 2023. |
| CorporateAuthor | the UnLocke team UnLocke team |
| CorporateAuthor_xml | – name: the UnLocke team – name: UnLocke team |
| DBID | C6C AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 5PM |
| DOI | 10.1007/s41465-023-00271-0 |
| DatabaseName | Springer Nature OA Free Journals CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: C6C name: Springer Nature OA Free Journals url: http://www.springeropen.com/ sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Anatomy & Physiology Psychology |
| EISSN | 2509-3304 |
| EndPage | 275 |
| ExternalDocumentID | PMC10770252 38186609 10_1007_s41465_023_00271_0 |
| Genre | Journal Article |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Education Endowment Foundation (UK) – fundername: Wellcome Trust funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100010269 |
| GroupedDBID | -EM 0R~ 406 AACDK AAHNG AAIAL AAJBT AANZL AARHV AASML AATNV AATVU AAUYE ABAKF ABDZT ABECU ABFTV ABJNI ABJOX ABKCH ABMQK ABQBU ABTEG ABTKH ABTMW ABXPI ACAOD ACDTI ACGFS ACHSB ACMLO ACOKC ACPIV ACZOJ ADHHG ADKNI ADKPE ADTPH ADURQ ADYFF ADZKW AEBTG AEFQL AEJRE AEMSY AEOHA AESKC AEVLU AEXYK AFBBN AFQWF AGDGC AGMZJ AGQEE AGRTI AHKAY AHSBF AIAKS AIGIU AILAN AITGF AJRNO AJZVZ ALFXC ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMXSW AMYLF AMYQR ASPBG AVWKF AXYYD BGNMA C6C CSCUP DNIVK DPUIP EBLON EBS EIOEI EJD FERAY FIGPU FINBP FNLPD FSGXE GGCAI GJIRD H13 IKXTQ IWAJR J-C JZLTJ KOV LLZTM M4Y NPVJJ NQJWS NU0 O9J PT4 RLLFE ROL RSV SJYHP SNE SNPRN SNX SOHCF SOJ SPISZ SRMVM SSLCW STPWE TSG UOJIU UTJUX UZXMN VFIZW ZMTXR AAYXX ABBRH ABDBE ABFSG ACSTC AEZWR AFDZB AFHIU AFOHR AHPBZ AHWEU AIXLP ATHPR AYFIA CITATION ABRTQ NPM 7X8 5PM |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-fc218be6811eeeaff7266180e938cb07738e70d0f12bc56df9b62cb0d0fbc24c3 |
| IEDL.DBID | C6C |
| ISSN | 2509-3290 2509-3304 |
| IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 18:42:19 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 00:55:57 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:56:16 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:14:21 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:11:43 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 21 02:40:42 EST 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 3-4 |
| Keywords | Science Misconceptions Executive function Mathematics Children Counterintuitive reasoning |
| Language | English |
| License | The Author(s) 2023. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c447t-fc218be6811eeeaff7266180e938cb07738e70d0f12bc56df9b62cb0d0fbc24c3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-9828-9548 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-023-00271-0 |
| PMID | 38186609 |
| PQID | 2911848367 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| PageCount | 19 |
| ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10770252 proquest_miscellaneous_2911848367 pubmed_primary_38186609 crossref_primary_10_1007_s41465_023_00271_0 crossref_citationtrail_10_1007_s41465_023_00271_0 springer_journals_10_1007_s41465_023_00271_0 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2023-12-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2023-12-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2023 text: 2023-12-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | Cham |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Cham – name: Switzerland |
| PublicationTitle | Journal of cognitive enhancement |
| PublicationTitleAbbrev | J Cogn Enhanc |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | J Cogn Enhanc |
| PublicationYear | 2023 |
| Publisher | Springer International Publishing |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Springer International Publishing |
| References | CraggLGilmoreCSkills underlying mathematics: The role of executive function in the development of mathematics proficiencyTrends in Neuroscience and Education201432636810.1016/j.tine.2013.12.001 JASP Team. (2019). JASP (Version 0.13.0.0) [computer software]. GreenCSBavelierDExercising your brain: A review of human brain plasticity and training-induced learningPsychology and Aging200823469219140641289681810.1037/a0014345 EspyKAMcDiarmidMMCwikMFStaletsMMHambyASennTEThe contribution of executive functions to emergent mathematic skills in preschool childrenDevelopmental Neuropsychology20042614654861527690510.1207/s15326942dn2601_6 MareschalDThe neuroscience of conceptual learning in science and mathematicsCurrent Opinion in Behavioral Sciences20161011411810.1016/j.cobeha.2016.06.001 MorrisonABCheinJMDoes working memory training work? The promise and challenges of enhancing cognition by training working memoryPsychonomic Bulletin & Review2011181466010.3758/s13423-010-0034-0 DumontheilIKlingbergTBrain activity during a visuospatial working memory task predicts arithmetical performance 2 years laterCerebral Cortex2012225107810852176822610.1093/cercor/bhr175 WechslerDWechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence (WASI-II)20112Pearson HewsonPWA conceptual change approach to learning scienceEuropean Journal of Science Education19813438339610.1080/0140528810304004 St Clair-ThompsonHLGathercoleSEExecutive functions and achievements in school: Shifting, updating, inhibition, and working memoryQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology200659474575910.1080/17470210500162854 TolmieAKGhazaliZMorrisSChildren’s science learning: A core skills approachBritish Journal of Educational Psychology20168634814972719927910.1111/bjep.12119 De NeysWVerschuerenNWorking memory capacity and a notorious brain teasers: The case of the Monty Hall DilemmaExperimental Psychology200653212313110.1027/1618-3169.53.1.12316909937 Department for Education. (2018). Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/department-for-education/about/statistics NersessianNJConceptual change in science and in science educationSynthese198980116318310.1007/BF00869953 AllenMMisconceptions in primary science2014McGraw-Hill Education (UK) MeltzerLExecutive function in education: From theory to practice2018Guilford Publications DunbarKNFugelsangJASteinCLovettMCShahPDo naïve theories ever go away? Using brain and behavior to understand changes in conceptsCarnegie Mellon symposia on cognition. Thinking with data2007Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers193205 GL Assessment. (2015d). Progress Test in Science 9. GL Assessment. SimpsonARiggsKJUnder what conditions do young children have difficulty inhibiting manual actions?Developmental Psychology20074324171735254910.1037/0012-1649.43.2.417 ThomasMSAnsariDKnowlandVCAnnual research review: Educational neuroscience: Progress and prospectsJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry20196044774923034551810.1111/jcpp.12973 Brault FoisyL-MPotvinPRiopelMMassonSIs inhibition involved in overcoming a common physics misconception in mechanics?Trends in Neuroscience and Education201541–2263610.1016/j.tine.2015.03.001 DiamondALingDSConclusions about interventions, programs, and approaches for improving executive functions that appear justified and those that, despite much hype, do notDevelopmental Cognitive Neuroscience201618344810.1016/j.dcn.2015.11.00526749076 HansenADrewsDDudgeonJLawtonFSurteesLChildren's Errors in Mathematics2017Learning Matters SpoonerMErrors and misconceptions in mathematics at key stage 2: Working Towards Success in SATs2012David Fulton Publishers10.4324/9780203453728 GauthierAPorayska-PomstaKMayerSDumonteilIFarranEBellDMareschalDthe UnLocke TeamRedesigning learning games for different learning contexts: applying a serious game design framework to redesign stop & thinkInternational Journal of Child-Computer Interaction20223310050310.1016/j.ijcci.2022.100503 SzűcsDDevineASolteszFNobesAGabrielFDevelopmental dyscalculia is related to visuo-spatial memory and inhibition impairmentCortex201349102674268823890692387885010.1016/j.cortex.2013.06.007 MorrisSFarranEKDumontheilIField independence associates with mathematics and science performance in 5- to 10-year-olds after accounting for domain-general factorsMind, Brain, and Education201913426827810.1111/mbe.12214 RhodesSMBoothJNCampbellLEBlytheRAWheateNJDelibegovicMEvidence for a role of executive functions in learning biologyInfant and Child Development2014231678310.1002/icd.1823 KwonY-JLawsonAEChungW-HKimY-SEffect on development of proportional reasoning skill of physical experience and cognitive abilities associated with prefrontal lobe activityJournal of Research in Science Teaching200037101171118110.1002/1098-2736(200012)37:10<1171::AID-TEA8>3.0.CO;2-A PineKMesserDSt. JohnKChildren’s misconceptions in primary science: A survey of teachers' viewsResearch in Science & Technological Education2001191799610.1080/02635140120046240 Naylor, S., & Keogh, B. (2013). Concept Cartoons: What have we learnt? Journal of Turkish Science Education, 10(1). https://www.tused.org/index.php/tused/article/view/273/223 BullRLeeKExecutive functioning and mathematics achievementChild Development Perspectives201481364110.1111/cdep.12059 HoudeOZagoLMelletEMoutierSPineauAMazoyerBTzourio-MazoyerNShifting from the perceptual brain to the logical brain: The neural impact of cognitive inhibition trainingJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience20001257217281105491510.1162/089892900562525 SmidCRKarbachJSteinbeisNToward a science of effective cognitive trainingCurrent Directions in Psychological Science202029653153710.1177/0963721420951599 GilliganKAHodgkissAThomasMSFarranEKThe developmental relations between spatial cognition and mathematics in primary school childrenDevelopmental Science2019224e1278610.1111/desc.1278630548725 VosniadouSPnevmatikosDMakrisNLepeniotiDEikospentakiKChountalaAKyrianakisGThe recruitment of shifting and inhibition in on-line science and mathematics tasksCognitive Science20184261860188610.1111/cogs.12624 BlairCRazzaRPRelating effortful control, executive function, and false belief understanding to emerging mathematics and literacy ability in kindergartenChild Development20077826476631738179510.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01019.x KhngKHLeeKInhibiting interference from prior knowledge: Arithmetic intrusions in algebra word problem solvingLearning and Individual Differences200919226226810.1016/j.lindif.2009.01.004 RhodesSMBoothJNPalmerLEBlytheRADelibegovicMWheateNJExecutive functions predict conceptual learning of scienceBritish Journal of Developmental Psychology20163422612752675159710.1111/bjdp.12129 McCrimmonAWSmithADReview of the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence, Second Edition (WASI-II)Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment201331333734110.1177/0734282912467756 SerpellZNEspositoAGDevelopment of executive functions: implications for educational policy and practicePolicy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences20163220321010.1177/2372732216654718 Department for Education. (2013b). Science programmes of study: Key stage 2. KeoghBNaylorSConcept cartoons, teaching and learning in science: An evaluationInternational Journal of Science Education199921443144610.1080/095006999290642 BotvinickMMCohenJDThe computational and neural basis of cognitive control: Charted territory and new frontiersCognitive Science2014386124912852507947210.1111/cogs.12126 MassonSPotvinPRiopelMBrault FoisyL-MDifferences in brain activation between novices and experts in science during a task involving a common misconception in electricityMind, Brain, and Education201481445510.1111/mbe.12043 DabellJKeoghBNaylorSConcept cartoons in mathematics education2008Millgate House CareySScience education as conceptual changeJournal of Applied Developmental Psychology2000211131910.1016/S0193-3973(99)00046-5 Nader-Grosbois, N., & Day, J. M. (2011). Emotional cognition: Theory of mind and face recognition. In International Handbook of Autism and Pervasive Developmental Disorders (pp. 127–157). Springer. HautusMJCorrections for extreme proportions and their biasing effects on estimated values ofd′Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers1995271465110.3758/BF03203619 PotvinPMalenfant-RobichaudGCormierCMassonSCoexistence of misconceptions and scientific conceptions in chemistry professors: A mental chronometry and fMRI studyFrontiers in Education202010.3389/feduc.2020.542458 CraggLKeebleSRichardsonSRoomeHEGilmoreCDirect and indirect influences of executive functions on mathematics achievementCognition201716212262818903410.1016/j.cognition.2017.01.014 GL Assessment. (2015b). Progress Test in Mathematics 9. GL Assessment. GreenCSBavelierDKramerAFVinogradovSAnsorgeUBallKKBingelUImproving methodological standards in behavioural interventions for cognitive enhancementJournal of Cognitive Enhancement2019322910.1007/s41465-018-0115-y1-28 GL Assessment. (2015c). Progress Test in Science 7. GL Assessment. Brookman-ByrneAMareschalDTolmieAKDumontheilIInhibitory control and counterintuitive science and mathematics reasoning in adolescencePLoS ONE201813629927969601311910.1371/journal.pone.0198973 RyanJWilliamsJChildren's Mathematics 4–15: Learning from Errors and Misconceptions2007McGraw-Hill Education GatesPIssues in Mathematics Teaching2002Routledge GauthierAPorayska-PomstaKDumontheilIMayerSMareschalDManipulating interface design features affects children’s stopping-and-thinking behaviors in a counterintuitive-problem gameACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction202229article 210.1145/3485168 ShapiroHMWongLMSimonTJA cross-sectional analysis of the development of response inhibition in children with chromosome 22q11. 2 deletion syndromeFrontiers in Psychiatry201348123966958373611610.3389/fpsyt.2013.00081 CloggCCPetkovaEHaritouAStatistical methods for comparing regression coefficients between modelsAmerican Journal of Sociology199510051261129310.1086/230638 DonatiGMeaburnELDumontheilIThe specificity of associations between cognition and attainment in English, mathema P Potvin (271_CR73) 2020 (271_CR61) 2018 HL St Clair-Thompson (271_CR84) 2006; 59 A Brookman-Byrne (271_CR6) 2019; 13 W De Neys (271_CR16) 2006; 53 271_CR34 271_CR36 271_CR35 271_CR37 I Dumontheil (271_CR25) 2012; 22 A Brookman-Byrne (271_CR7) 2018; 13 J McTighe (271_CR60) 1988; 45 CS Green (271_CR39) 2008; 23 A Villani (271_CR90) 1992; 76 A Diamond (271_CR20) 2002; 38 S Vosniadou (271_CR91) 2018; 42 ET Berkman (271_CR2) 2014; 34 AW McCrimmon (271_CR59) 2013; 31 R Bull (271_CR8) 2014; 8 A Hansen (271_CR41) 2017 A Diamond (271_CR21) 2011; 333 J Ryan (271_CR77) 2007 G Donati (271_CR24) 2019; 69 KA Gilligan (271_CR32) 2019; 22 NJ Nersessian (271_CR67) 1989; 80 D Mayer (271_CR58) 2014; 29 271_CR65 271_CR64 SM Rhodes (271_CR75) 2014; 23 271_CR69 K Pine (271_CR70) 2001; 19 S Morris (271_CR62) 2019; 13 271_CR72 K Lee (271_CR54) 2015; 108 271_CR71 A Hodgkiss (271_CR45) 2018; 88 F Nemmi (271_CR66) 2016; 20 A Diamond (271_CR22) 2016; 18 L Cragg (271_CR14) 2017; 162 PW Hewson (271_CR43) 1981; 3 CR Smid (271_CR81) 2020; 29 T Klingberg (271_CR50) 2010; 14 M Allen (271_CR1) 2014 A Gauthier (271_CR30) 2022; 29 271_CR18 271_CR17 R Bull (271_CR9) 2001; 19 271_CR19 MM Botvinick (271_CR4) 2014; 38 L Cragg (271_CR13) 2014; 3 KA Espy (271_CR27) 2004; 26 SM Rhodes (271_CR76) 2016; 34 M Spooner (271_CR82) 2012 P Goodyear (271_CR38) 2010 B Keogh (271_CR49) 1999; 21 S Masson (271_CR57) 2014; 8 Z Dienes (271_CR23) 2014; 5 J Ho (271_CR44) 2019; 16 D Szűcs (271_CR85) 2013; 49 MJ Hautus (271_CR42) 1995; 27 R Jacob (271_CR47) 2015; 85 KN Dunbar (271_CR26) 2007 J Dabell (271_CR15) 2008 C Gilmore (271_CR33) 2015; 47 ZN Serpell (271_CR78) 2016; 3 D Szűcs (271_CR86) 2014; 17 A Simpson (271_CR80) 2007; 43 Y-J Kwon (271_CR52) 2000; 37 S Carey (271_CR10) 2000; 21 (271_CR29) 2002 L-M Brault Foisy (271_CR5) 2015; 4 Z Li (271_CR55) 2021; 147 HM Shapiro (271_CR79) 2013; 4 D Wechsler (271_CR93) 2011 HR Wilkinson (271_CR94) 2020; 4 CS Green (271_CR40) 2019; 3 KH Khng (271_CR51) 2009; 19 JT Nigg (271_CR68) 2000; 126 C Blair (271_CR3) 2007; 78 271_CR88 MS Thomas (271_CR87) 2019; 60 D Mareschal (271_CR56) 2016; 10 271_CR48 H Stanislaw (271_CR83) 1999; 31 O Houde (271_CR46) 2000; 12 271_CR92 Y-J Kwon (271_CR53) 2000; 37 A Renouard (271_CR74) 2018; 3 AK Tolmie (271_CR89) 2016; 86 CC Clogg (271_CR11) 1995; 100 AD Cockburn (271_CR12) 2008 AB Morrison (271_CR63) 2011; 18 I Friso-Van Den Bos (271_CR28) 2013; 10 A Gauthier (271_CR31) 2022; 33 |
| References_xml | – reference: BullRScerifGExecutive functioning as a predictor of children's mathematics ability: inhibition, switching, and working memoryDevelopmental neuropsychology200119327329310.1207/S15326942DN1903_311758669 – reference: DiamondAKirkhamNAmsoDConditions under which young children can hold two rules in mind and inhibit a prepotent responseDevelopmental Psychology20023833521200537910.1037/0012-1649.38.3.352 – reference: GreenCSBavelierDExercising your brain: A review of human brain plasticity and training-induced learningPsychology and Aging200823469219140641289681810.1037/a0014345 – reference: BotvinickMMCohenJDThe computational and neural basis of cognitive control: Charted territory and new frontiersCognitive Science2014386124912852507947210.1111/cogs.12126 – reference: MorrisonABCheinJMDoes working memory training work? The promise and challenges of enhancing cognition by training working memoryPsychonomic Bulletin & Review2011181466010.3758/s13423-010-0034-0 – reference: Brookman-ByrneAMareschalDTolmieAKDumontheilIThe unique contributions of verbal analogical reasoning and nonverbal matrix reasoning to science and mathematics problem-solving in adolescenceMind, Brain, and Education201913321122310.1111/mbe.12212 – reference: GauthierAPorayska-PomstaKMayerSDumonteilIFarranEBellDMareschalDthe UnLocke TeamRedesigning learning games for different learning contexts: applying a serious game design framework to redesign stop & thinkInternational Journal of Child-Computer Interaction20223310050310.1016/j.ijcci.2022.100503 – reference: StanislawHTodorovNCalculation of signal detection theory measuresBehavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers199931113714910.3758/BF03207704 – reference: GauthierAPorayska-PomstaKDumontheilIMayerSMareschalDManipulating interface design features affects children’s stopping-and-thinking behaviors in a counterintuitive-problem gameACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction202229article 210.1145/3485168 – reference: TolmieAKGhazaliZMorrisSChildren’s science learning: A core skills approachBritish Journal of Educational Psychology20168634814972719927910.1111/bjep.12119 – reference: Porayska-Pomsta, K., Alcorn, A. M., Avramides, K., Beale, S., Bernardini, S., Foster, M. E., ..., & Kossyvaki, L. (2018). Blending human and artificial intelligence to support autistic children’s social communication skills. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 25(6), 35. – reference: WechslerDWechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence (WASI-II)20112Pearson – reference: KhngKHLeeKInhibiting interference from prior knowledge: Arithmetic intrusions in algebra word problem solvingLearning and Individual Differences200919226226810.1016/j.lindif.2009.01.004 – reference: VillaniAConceptual change in science and science educationScience Education199276222323710.1002/sce.3730760209 – reference: RyanJWilliamsJChildren's Mathematics 4–15: Learning from Errors and Misconceptions2007McGraw-Hill Education – reference: CloggCCPetkovaEHaritouAStatistical methods for comparing regression coefficients between modelsAmerican Journal of Sociology199510051261129310.1086/230638 – reference: KwonY-JLawsonAELinking brain growth with the development of scientific reasoning ability and conceptual change during adolescenceJournal of Research in Science Teaching2000371446210.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200001)37:1<44::AIDTEA4>3.0.CO;2-J – reference: DienesZUsing Bayes to get the most out of non-significant resultsFrontiers in Psychology2014578125120503411419610.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781 – reference: CockburnADLittlerGMathematical misconceptions. A Guide for Primary Teachers2008London, UKSage Publications10.4135/9781446269121 – reference: Department for Education. (2018). Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/department-for-education/about/statistics – reference: RenouardAMazabraudYContext-based learning for inhibition of alternative conceptions: the next step forward in science educationnpj Science of Learning2018311030631471622029110.1038/s41539-018-0026-9 – reference: Wagenmakers, E., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Love, J., ..., & Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology: I. Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 35–57. – reference: SzűcsDDevineASolteszFNobesAGabrielFDevelopmental dyscalculia is related to visuo-spatial memory and inhibition impairmentCortex201349102674268823890692387885010.1016/j.cortex.2013.06.007 – reference: DunbarKNFugelsangJASteinCLovettMCShahPDo naïve theories ever go away? Using brain and behavior to understand changes in conceptsCarnegie Mellon symposia on cognition. Thinking with data2007Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers193205 – reference: KwonY-JLawsonAEChungW-HKimY-SEffect on development of proportional reasoning skill of physical experience and cognitive abilities associated with prefrontal lobe activityJournal of Research in Science Teaching200037101171118110.1002/1098-2736(200012)37:10<1171::AID-TEA8>3.0.CO;2-A – reference: MassonSPotvinPRiopelMBrault FoisyL-MDifferences in brain activation between novices and experts in science during a task involving a common misconception in electricityMind, Brain, and Education201481445510.1111/mbe.12043 – reference: NersessianNJConceptual change in science and in science educationSynthese198980116318310.1007/BF00869953 – reference: AllenMMisconceptions in primary science2014McGraw-Hill Education (UK) – reference: GilmoreCKeebleSRichardsonSCraggLThe role of cognitive inhibition in different components of arithmeticZDM Mathematics Education201547577178210.1007/s11858-014-0659-y – reference: HautusMJCorrections for extreme proportions and their biasing effects on estimated values ofd′Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers1995271465110.3758/BF03203619 – reference: KeoghBNaylorSConcept cartoons, teaching and learning in science: An evaluationInternational Journal of Science Education199921443144610.1080/095006999290642 – reference: BlairCRazzaRPRelating effortful control, executive function, and false belief understanding to emerging mathematics and literacy ability in kindergartenChild Development20077826476631738179510.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01019.x – reference: GL Assessment. (2015d). Progress Test in Science 9. GL Assessment. – reference: NiggJTOn inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: Views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomyPsychological Bulletin200012622201074864110.1037/0033-2909.126.2.220 – reference: RhodesSMBoothJNPalmerLEBlytheRADelibegovicMWheateNJExecutive functions predict conceptual learning of scienceBritish Journal of Developmental Psychology20163422612752675159710.1111/bjdp.12129 – reference: Tolmie, A. (2014). ScotSPRinG: the effects of group work in Scottish primary schools on attainment, interaction and classroom relationships. In Effective Group Work in Primary School Classrooms (pp. 129-147). Springer. – reference: KlingbergTTraining and plasticity of working memoryTrends in Cognitive Sciences20101473173242063035010.1016/j.tics.2010.05.002 – reference: BerkmanETKahnLEMerchantJSTraining-induced changes in inhibitory control network activityJournal of Neuroscience20143411491572438127610.1523/JNEUROSCI.3564-13.2014 – reference: DiamondALeeKInterventions shown to aid executive function development in children 4 to 12 years oldScience2011333604595996421852486315991710.1126/science.1204529 – reference: HoudeOZagoLMelletEMoutierSPineauAMazoyerBTzourio-MazoyerNShifting from the perceptual brain to the logical brain: The neural impact of cognitive inhibition trainingJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience20001257217281105491510.1162/089892900562525 – reference: DonatiGMeaburnELDumontheilIThe specificity of associations between cognition and attainment in English, mathematics and science during adolescenceLearning and Individual Differences201969849310.1016/j.lindif.2018.11.012 – reference: DiamondALingDSConclusions about interventions, programs, and approaches for improving executive functions that appear justified and those that, despite much hype, do notDevelopmental Cognitive Neuroscience201618344810.1016/j.dcn.2015.11.00526749076 – reference: GL Assessment. (2015b). Progress Test in Mathematics 9. GL Assessment. – reference: MeltzerLExecutive function in education: From theory to practice2018Guilford Publications – reference: DumontheilIKlingbergTBrain activity during a visuospatial working memory task predicts arithmetical performance 2 years laterCerebral Cortex2012225107810852176822610.1093/cercor/bhr175 – reference: ShapiroHMWongLMSimonTJA cross-sectional analysis of the development of response inhibition in children with chromosome 22q11. 2 deletion syndromeFrontiers in Psychiatry201348123966958373611610.3389/fpsyt.2013.00081 – reference: MareschalDThe neuroscience of conceptual learning in science and mathematicsCurrent Opinion in Behavioral Sciences20161011411810.1016/j.cobeha.2016.06.001 – reference: SmidCRKarbachJSteinbeisNToward a science of effective cognitive trainingCurrent Directions in Psychological Science202029653153710.1177/0963721420951599 – reference: Brookman-ByrneAMareschalDTolmieAKDumontheilIInhibitory control and counterintuitive science and mathematics reasoning in adolescencePLoS ONE201813629927969601311910.1371/journal.pone.0198973 – reference: Brault FoisyL-MPotvinPRiopelMMassonSIs inhibition involved in overcoming a common physics misconception in mechanics?Trends in Neuroscience and Education201541–2263610.1016/j.tine.2015.03.001 – reference: SerpellZNEspositoAGDevelopment of executive functions: implications for educational policy and practicePolicy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences20163220321010.1177/2372732216654718 – reference: Nader-Grosbois, N., & Day, J. M. (2011). Emotional cognition: Theory of mind and face recognition. In International Handbook of Autism and Pervasive Developmental Disorders (pp. 127–157). Springer. – reference: VosniadouSPnevmatikosDMakrisNLepeniotiDEikospentakiKChountalaAKyrianakisGThe recruitment of shifting and inhibition in on-line science and mathematics tasksCognitive Science20184261860188610.1111/cogs.12624 – reference: ThomasMSAnsariDKnowlandVCAnnual research review: Educational neuroscience: Progress and prospectsJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry20196044774923034551810.1111/jcpp.12973 – reference: De NeysWVerschuerenNWorking memory capacity and a notorious brain teasers: The case of the Monty Hall DilemmaExperimental Psychology200653212313110.1027/1618-3169.53.1.12316909937 – reference: JASP Team. (2019). JASP (Version 0.13.0.0) [computer software]. – reference: Porayska-Pomsta, K., Anderson, K., Bernardini, S., Guldberg, K., Smith, T., Kossivaki, L., ..., & Lowe, I. (2013). Building an intelligent, authorable serious game for autistic children and their carers. International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (456–475). Springer. – reference: SzűcsDDevineASolteszFNobesAGabrielFCognitive components of a mathematical processing network in 9-year-old childrenDevelopmental Science201417450652425089322425313210.1111/desc.12144 – reference: SimpsonARiggsKJUnder what conditions do young children have difficulty inhibiting manual actions?Developmental Psychology20074324171735254910.1037/0012-1649.43.2.417 – reference: McCrimmonAWSmithADReview of the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence, Second Edition (WASI-II)Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment201331333734110.1177/0734282912467756 – reference: Department for Education. (2013a). Mathematics programmes of study: Key stage 2. – reference: PineKMesserDSt. JohnKChildren’s misconceptions in primary science: A survey of teachers' viewsResearch in Science & Technological Education2001191799610.1080/02635140120046240 – reference: Palak, R., Rutt, S., Easton, C., Sims, D., Bradshaw, S. & McNamara, S. (2019). Stop and Think: Learning counterintuitive concepts evaluation report. Retrieved from https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/projects-and-evaluation/projects/learning-counterintuitive-concepts/ – reference: CraggLKeebleSRichardsonSRoomeHEGilmoreCDirect and indirect influences of executive functions on mathematics achievementCognition201716212262818903410.1016/j.cognition.2017.01.014 – reference: RhodesSMBoothJNCampbellLEBlytheRAWheateNJDelibegovicMEvidence for a role of executive functions in learning biologyInfant and Child Development2014231678310.1002/icd.1823 – reference: NemmiFHelanderEHeleniusOAlmeidaRHasslerMRäsänenPKlingbergTBehavior and neuroimaging at baseline predict individual response to combined mathematical and working memory training in childrenDevelopmental Cognitive Neuroscience201620435110.1016/j.dcn.2016.06.004273992786987694 – reference: SpoonerMErrors and misconceptions in mathematics at key stage 2: Working Towards Success in SATs2012David Fulton Publishers10.4324/9780203453728 – reference: CareySScience education as conceptual changeJournal of Applied Developmental Psychology2000211131910.1016/S0193-3973(99)00046-5 – reference: WilkinsonHRSmidCMorrisSFarranEKDumontheilIMayerSTolmieABellDPorayska-PomstaKHolmesWMareschalDThomasMSCthe UnLocke Team**Domain-specific inhibitory control training to improve children’s learning of counterintuitive concepts in mathematics and scienceJournal of Cognitive Enhancement2020429631410.1007/s41465-019-00161-432832846 – reference: HewsonPWA conceptual change approach to learning scienceEuropean Journal of Science Education19813438339610.1080/0140528810304004 – reference: EspyKAMcDiarmidMMCwikMFStaletsMMHambyASennTEThe contribution of executive functions to emergent mathematic skills in preschool childrenDevelopmental Neuropsychology20042614654861527690510.1207/s15326942dn2601_6 – reference: GL Assessment. (2015a). Progress Test in Mathematics 7. GL Assessment. – reference: CraggLGilmoreCSkills underlying mathematics: The role of executive function in the development of mathematics proficiencyTrends in Neuroscience and Education201432636810.1016/j.tine.2013.12.001 – reference: GoodyearPRetalisSTechnology-enhanced learning2010Sense Publishers10.1163/9789460910623 – reference: DabellJKeoghBNaylorSConcept cartoons in mathematics education2008Millgate House – reference: GatesPIssues in Mathematics Teaching2002Routledge – reference: LiZYangGWuHLiQXuHGöschlFNolteGLiuXModality-specific neural mechanisms of cognitive control in a Stroop-like taskBrain and Cognition202114710566210.1016/j.bandc.2020.10566233360042 – reference: MorrisSFarranEKDumontheilIField independence associates with mathematics and science performance in 5- to 10-year-olds after accounting for domain-general factorsMind, Brain, and Education201913426827810.1111/mbe.12214 – reference: Friso-Van Den BosIVan Der VenSHKroesbergenEHVan LuitJEWorking memory and mathematics in primary school children: A meta-analysisEducational Research Review201310294410.1016/j.edurev.2013.05.003 – reference: HansenADrewsDDudgeonJLawtonFSurteesLChildren's Errors in Mathematics2017Learning Matters – reference: HoJTumkayaTAryalSMoving beyond P values: data analysis with estimation graphicsNature Methods20191656556610.1038/s41592-019-0470-331217592 – reference: MayerDSodianBKoerberSSchwippertKScientific reasoning in elementary school children: Assessment and relations with cognitive abilitiesLearning and Instruction201429435510.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.07.005 – reference: St Clair-ThompsonHLGathercoleSEExecutive functions and achievements in school: Shifting, updating, inhibition, and working memoryQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology200659474575910.1080/17470210500162854 – reference: PotvinPMalenfant-RobichaudGCormierCMassonSCoexistence of misconceptions and scientific conceptions in chemistry professors: A mental chronometry and fMRI studyFrontiers in Education202010.3389/feduc.2020.542458 – reference: Naylor, S., & Keogh, B. (2013). Concept Cartoons: What have we learnt? Journal of Turkish Science Education, 10(1). https://www.tused.org/index.php/tused/article/view/273/223 – reference: HodgkissAGilliganKATolmieAKThomasMSFarranEKSpatial cognition and science achievement: The contribution of intrinsic and extrinsic spatial skills from 7 to 11 yearsBritish Journal of Educational Psychology20188846756972935947610.1111/bjep.12211 – reference: LeeKBullRDevelopmental changes in working memory, updating, and mathematics achievementJournal of Educational Psychology.2015108686988210.1037/edu0000090 – reference: GL Assessment. (2015c). Progress Test in Science 7. GL Assessment. – reference: McTigheJLymanFTJrCueing thinking in the classroom: The promise of theory-embedded toolsEducational Leadership19884571824 – reference: GreenCSBavelierDKramerAFVinogradovSAnsorgeUBallKKBingelUImproving methodological standards in behavioural interventions for cognitive enhancementJournal of Cognitive Enhancement2019322910.1007/s41465-018-0115-y1-28 – reference: GilliganKAHodgkissAThomasMSFarranEKThe developmental relations between spatial cognition and mathematics in primary school childrenDevelopmental Science2019224e1278610.1111/desc.1278630548725 – reference: BullRLeeKExecutive functioning and mathematics achievementChild Development Perspectives201481364110.1111/cdep.12059 – reference: JacobRParkinsonJThe potential for school-based interventions that target executive function to improve academic achievement: a reviewReview of Educational Research201585451255210.3102/0034654314561338 – reference: Department for Education. (2013b). Science programmes of study: Key stage 2. – volume: 78 start-page: 647 issue: 2 year: 2007 ident: 271_CR3 publication-title: Child Development doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01019.x – ident: 271_CR18 – volume: 20 start-page: 43 year: 2016 ident: 271_CR66 publication-title: Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2016.06.004 – ident: 271_CR72 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-03161-3_34 – volume: 333 start-page: 959 issue: 6045 year: 2011 ident: 271_CR21 publication-title: Science doi: 10.1126/science.1204529 – volume: 45 start-page: 18 issue: 7 year: 1988 ident: 271_CR60 publication-title: Educational Leadership – volume: 29 start-page: article 2 year: 2022 ident: 271_CR30 publication-title: ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction doi: 10.1145/3485168 – volume: 147 start-page: 105662 year: 2021 ident: 271_CR55 publication-title: Brain and Cognition doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105662 – ident: 271_CR34 – volume: 31 start-page: 337 issue: 3 year: 2013 ident: 271_CR59 publication-title: Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment doi: 10.1177/0734282912467756 – volume: 19 start-page: 79 issue: 1 year: 2001 ident: 271_CR70 publication-title: Research in Science & Technological Education doi: 10.1080/02635140120046240 – volume: 4 start-page: 26 issue: 1–2 year: 2015 ident: 271_CR5 publication-title: Trends in Neuroscience and Education doi: 10.1016/j.tine.2015.03.001 – volume: 13 issue: 6 year: 2018 ident: 271_CR7 publication-title: PLoS ONE doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198973 – volume: 13 start-page: 211 issue: 3 year: 2019 ident: 271_CR6 publication-title: Mind, Brain, and Education doi: 10.1111/mbe.12212 – volume: 3 start-page: 383 issue: 4 year: 1981 ident: 271_CR43 publication-title: European Journal of Science Education doi: 10.1080/0140528810304004 – volume: 10 start-page: 114 year: 2016 ident: 271_CR56 publication-title: Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.06.001 – ident: 271_CR64 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-8065-6_9 – volume: 34 start-page: 149 issue: 1 year: 2014 ident: 271_CR2 publication-title: Journal of Neuroscience doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3564-13.2014 – volume: 4 start-page: 81 year: 2013 ident: 271_CR79 publication-title: Frontiers in Psychiatry doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00081 – volume: 27 start-page: 46 issue: 1 year: 1995 ident: 271_CR42 publication-title: Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers doi: 10.3758/BF03203619 – ident: 271_CR19 – volume-title: Technology-enhanced learning year: 2010 ident: 271_CR38 doi: 10.1163/9789460910623 – volume: 12 start-page: 721 issue: 5 year: 2000 ident: 271_CR46 publication-title: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience doi: 10.1162/089892900562525 – volume: 14 start-page: 317 issue: 7 year: 2010 ident: 271_CR50 publication-title: Trends in Cognitive Sciences doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.002 – volume: 8 start-page: 36 issue: 1 year: 2014 ident: 271_CR8 publication-title: Child Development Perspectives doi: 10.1111/cdep.12059 – volume: 37 start-page: 1171 issue: 10 year: 2000 ident: 271_CR53 publication-title: Journal of Research in Science Teaching doi: 10.1002/1098-2736(200012)37:10<1171::AID-TEA8>3.0.CO;2-A – volume: 10 start-page: 29 year: 2013 ident: 271_CR28 publication-title: Educational Research Review doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2013.05.003 – volume-title: Issues in Mathematics Teaching year: 2002 ident: 271_CR29 – volume: 31 start-page: 137 issue: 1 year: 1999 ident: 271_CR83 publication-title: Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers doi: 10.3758/BF03207704 – ident: 271_CR88 doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-6991-5_6 – volume: 86 start-page: 481 issue: 3 year: 2016 ident: 271_CR89 publication-title: British Journal of Educational Psychology doi: 10.1111/bjep.12119 – volume: 3 start-page: 63 issue: 2 year: 2014 ident: 271_CR13 publication-title: Trends in Neuroscience and Education doi: 10.1016/j.tine.2013.12.001 – volume: 38 start-page: 352 issue: 3 year: 2002 ident: 271_CR20 publication-title: Developmental Psychology doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.38.3.352 – ident: 271_CR35 – volume-title: Children's Mathematics 4–15: Learning from Errors and Misconceptions year: 2007 ident: 271_CR77 – volume: 3 start-page: 203 issue: 2 year: 2016 ident: 271_CR78 publication-title: Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences doi: 10.1177/2372732216654718 – volume-title: Mathematical misconceptions. A Guide for Primary Teachers year: 2008 ident: 271_CR12 doi: 10.4135/9781446269121 – volume: 5 start-page: 781 year: 2014 ident: 271_CR23 publication-title: Frontiers in Psychology doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781 – volume-title: Errors and misconceptions in mathematics at key stage 2: Working Towards Success in SATs year: 2012 ident: 271_CR82 doi: 10.4324/9780203453728 – volume: 18 start-page: 34 year: 2016 ident: 271_CR22 publication-title: Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2015.11.005 – volume: 69 start-page: 84 year: 2019 ident: 271_CR24 publication-title: Learning and Individual Differences doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2018.11.012 – volume: 19 start-page: 262 issue: 2 year: 2009 ident: 271_CR51 publication-title: Learning and Individual Differences doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2009.01.004 – volume: 29 start-page: 43 year: 2014 ident: 271_CR58 publication-title: Learning and Instruction doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.07.005 – volume-title: Misconceptions in primary science year: 2014 ident: 271_CR1 – volume: 26 start-page: 465 issue: 1 year: 2004 ident: 271_CR27 publication-title: Developmental Neuropsychology doi: 10.1207/s15326942dn2601_6 – volume: 13 start-page: 268 issue: 4 year: 2019 ident: 271_CR62 publication-title: Mind, Brain, and Education doi: 10.1111/mbe.12214 – volume: 34 start-page: 261 issue: 2 year: 2016 ident: 271_CR76 publication-title: British Journal of Developmental Psychology doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12129 – volume: 42 start-page: 1860 issue: 6 year: 2018 ident: 271_CR91 publication-title: Cognitive Science doi: 10.1111/cogs.12624 – volume: 38 start-page: 1249 issue: 6 year: 2014 ident: 271_CR4 publication-title: Cognitive Science doi: 10.1111/cogs.12126 – volume: 85 start-page: 512 issue: 4 year: 2015 ident: 271_CR47 publication-title: Review of Educational Research doi: 10.3102/0034654314561338 – volume: 22 start-page: 1078 issue: 5 year: 2012 ident: 271_CR25 publication-title: Cerebral Cortex doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr175 – volume: 37 start-page: 44 issue: 1 year: 2000 ident: 271_CR52 publication-title: Journal of Research in Science Teaching doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200001)37:1<44::AIDTEA4>3.0.CO;2-J – ident: 271_CR92 doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3 – volume: 23 start-page: 692 issue: 4 year: 2008 ident: 271_CR39 publication-title: Psychology and Aging doi: 10.1037/a0014345 – volume: 162 start-page: 12 year: 2017 ident: 271_CR14 publication-title: Cognition doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.01.014 – start-page: 193 volume-title: Carnegie Mellon symposia on cognition. Thinking with data year: 2007 ident: 271_CR26 – volume: 21 start-page: 431 issue: 4 year: 1999 ident: 271_CR49 publication-title: International Journal of Science Education doi: 10.1080/095006999290642 – volume-title: Children's Errors in Mathematics year: 2017 ident: 271_CR41 – volume: 3 start-page: 10 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 271_CR74 publication-title: npj Science of Learning doi: 10.1038/s41539-018-0026-9 – volume: 29 start-page: 531 issue: 6 year: 2020 ident: 271_CR81 publication-title: Current Directions in Psychological Science doi: 10.1177/0963721420951599 – ident: 271_CR36 – volume: 126 start-page: 220 issue: 2 year: 2000 ident: 271_CR68 publication-title: Psychological Bulletin doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.2.220 – volume: 53 start-page: 123 issue: 2 year: 2006 ident: 271_CR16 publication-title: Experimental Psychology doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.53.1.123 – volume: 16 start-page: 565 year: 2019 ident: 271_CR44 publication-title: Nature Methods doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0470-3 – volume: 80 start-page: 163 issue: 1 year: 1989 ident: 271_CR67 publication-title: Synthese doi: 10.1007/BF00869953 – volume: 59 start-page: 745 issue: 4 year: 2006 ident: 271_CR84 publication-title: Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology doi: 10.1080/17470210500162854 – volume: 47 start-page: 771 issue: 5 year: 2015 ident: 271_CR33 publication-title: ZDM Mathematics Education doi: 10.1007/s11858-014-0659-y – volume: 23 start-page: 67 issue: 1 year: 2014 ident: 271_CR75 publication-title: Infant and Child Development doi: 10.1002/icd.1823 – volume: 76 start-page: 223 issue: 2 year: 1992 ident: 271_CR90 publication-title: Science Education doi: 10.1002/sce.3730760209 – volume: 60 start-page: 477 issue: 4 year: 2019 ident: 271_CR87 publication-title: Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12973 – volume: 4 start-page: 296 year: 2020 ident: 271_CR94 publication-title: Journal of Cognitive Enhancement doi: 10.1007/s41465-019-00161-4 – volume-title: Concept cartoons in mathematics education year: 2008 ident: 271_CR15 – volume: 8 start-page: 44 issue: 1 year: 2014 ident: 271_CR57 publication-title: Mind, Brain, and Education doi: 10.1111/mbe.12043 – ident: 271_CR17 – volume: 33 start-page: 100503 year: 2022 ident: 271_CR31 publication-title: International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction doi: 10.1016/j.ijcci.2022.100503 – volume: 19 start-page: 273 issue: 3 year: 2001 ident: 271_CR9 publication-title: Developmental neuropsychology doi: 10.1207/S15326942DN1903_3 – volume: 100 start-page: 1261 issue: 5 year: 1995 ident: 271_CR11 publication-title: American Journal of Sociology doi: 10.1086/230638 – ident: 271_CR65 – volume: 43 start-page: 417 issue: 2 year: 2007 ident: 271_CR80 publication-title: Developmental Psychology doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.2.417 – volume: 22 start-page: e12786 issue: 4 year: 2019 ident: 271_CR32 publication-title: Developmental Science doi: 10.1111/desc.12786 – ident: 271_CR48 – ident: 271_CR71 doi: 10.1145/3271484 – volume: 88 start-page: 675 issue: 4 year: 2018 ident: 271_CR45 publication-title: British Journal of Educational Psychology doi: 10.1111/bjep.12211 – volume-title: Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence (WASI-II) year: 2011 ident: 271_CR93 – volume: 21 start-page: 13 issue: 1 year: 2000 ident: 271_CR10 publication-title: Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology doi: 10.1016/S0193-3973(99)00046-5 – ident: 271_CR69 – year: 2020 ident: 271_CR73 publication-title: Frontiers in Education doi: 10.3389/feduc.2020.542458 – volume: 17 start-page: 506 issue: 4 year: 2014 ident: 271_CR86 publication-title: Developmental Science doi: 10.1111/desc.12144 – ident: 271_CR37 – volume: 3 start-page: 2 year: 2019 ident: 271_CR40 publication-title: Journal of Cognitive Enhancement doi: 10.1007/s41465-018-0115-y1-28 – volume-title: Executive function in education: From theory to practice year: 2018 ident: 271_CR61 – volume: 18 start-page: 46 issue: 1 year: 2011 ident: 271_CR63 publication-title: Psychonomic Bulletin & Review doi: 10.3758/s13423-010-0034-0 – volume: 49 start-page: 2674 issue: 10 year: 2013 ident: 271_CR85 publication-title: Cortex doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.06.007 – volume: 108 start-page: 869 issue: 6 year: 2015 ident: 271_CR54 publication-title: Journal of Educational Psychology. doi: 10.1037/edu0000090 |
| SSID | ssj0001916409 ssib031263709 |
| Score | 2.2604146 |
| Snippet | Many scientific and mathematical concepts are counterintuitive because they conflict with misleading perceptual cues or incorrect naive theories that we build... |
| SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref springer |
| SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 257 |
| SubjectTerms | Behavioral Science and Psychology Cognitive Psychology Emotion Neuropsychology Neurosciences Original Research Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology Psychology |
| Title | How Do Executive Functions Influence Children’s Reasoning About Counterintuitive Concepts in Mathematics and Science? |
| URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41465-023-00271-0 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38186609 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2911848367 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC10770252 |
| Volume | 7 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Lb9QwEB5Be-kF0ZZHoFRGQlzAIn7ETk5ou3S1INEDolJvUeKMRSXIIrKr0ht_g7_XX9KxN4m0LarE1XaiKN94Hp6ZzwCvMm2ktJXnBWLOtdENr7IKuSlQaCGqwjexyvfEzE_1p7PsrKfJCb0wN_L37zpNWzn0ECseIigKfe_DdiZI7YbErJkOsqOENGqgIovnK-T36FjhQUa-4EoWad8z8-_XbtqlW87m7ZrJG4nTaI9mD-FB70iyyRr5XbiH7R7sT1oKon9cstcslnbGM_M92BnV3OU-XMwXF-zDgh3_RrcKyo7NyLZF8WMfhytL2LRv8r7687djX7Dq4rEtC1miJQuN7IHjmexVLD2igdj82LHzln0eiWA7VrUN67XH-0dwOjv-Op3z_voF7rS2S-4dmf8aTS4EIlbe22DM8xQLlbs6tVblaNMm9ULWLjONL2ojaYJGaie1U49hq120-BSYlBTqeRqzNepAjkx-XkDEpy6QxbgExPDzS9dzk4crMr6XI6tyBKwkwMoIWJkm8GZ85ueamePO1S8HTEvaQCErUrW4WHWlJHWf61wZm8CTNcbj-1TkA0yLBPIN9McFgZx7c6Y9_xZJuimstuRPygTeDoJS9uqhu-M7n_3f8uewI4MQx_qaA9ha_lrhC_KSlvUhbE9mR0cnh3GbXAMtOAj3 |
| linkProvider | Springer Nature |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1LT9wwEB5ReigX1EIf4dG6UtVLazV-rJ2cENqyWlrgUIHEzUocW0Vqs4jsCrj1b_D3-CWMvUmkhQqJq-1EUb7xPDwznwE-DaTiXBee5s5lVCpZ0WJQOKpyxyRjRe6rWOV7pMYn8sfp4LSlyQm9MPfy998aiVs59BALGiIoDH2fwXPJMPYJiVk17GRHMK5ER0UWz1fQ75GxwgONfE4Fz9O2Z-b_r120Sw-czYc1k_cSp9EejV7CautIkt058q9gydVrsL5bYxD995p8JrG0M56Zr8FKr-au1-FyPLkk3ydk78rZWVB2ZIS2LYof2e-uLCHDtsn79t9NQ365oonHtiRkiaYkNLIHjme0V7H0CAdi82NDzmpy2BPBNqSoK9Jqj53XcDLaOx6OaXv9ArVS6in1Fs1_6VTGmHOu8F4HY56lLheZLVOtReZ0WqWe8dIOVOXzUnGcwJHScmnFG1iuJ7V7B4RzDPU8junSyUCOjH5eQMSnNpDF2ARY9_ONbbnJwxUZf0zPqhwBMwiYiYCZNIEv_TPnc2aOR1d_7DA1uIFCVqSo3WTWGI7qPpOZUDqBt3OM-_eJyAeY5glkC-j3CwI59-JMffY7knRjWK3Rn-QJfO0ExbTqoXnkOzeetvwDvBgfHx6Yg_2jn5uwwoNAx1qbLVieXszcNnpM0_J93Cp3jRAKcQ |
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Lb9QwEB5BkVAvCFoe4WkkxAWsOrbXTk6o2na15VEhRKXerMSx1UrgrUhWpTf-Bn-PX8LYm0QsRZW42k4UZcbz8Mz3GeDFRCrOdeVp6VxBpZINrSaVo6p0uczzqvRN6vI9VPMj-fZ4cvwHij91uw8lyRWmIbI0hW7nrPE7I_BN4gaPyGJBY16FCfF1uIGZCot6PVXTQaNEzpUYCMrSqQtGQzL1faDrL6ngJeuRNP9-7bq3uhSCXu6k_KucmrzU7Dbc6sNLsrvShztwzYUt2N4NmFp_vSAvSWr4TCfpW7A5Gr-LbTifL87J3oLsf3d2GU0gmaHHS0pJDoaLTMi0h37_-vGzJZ9c1abDXBJrRx2J8PbI_IxeLDUk4UCCRLbkNJAPIz1sS6rQkN6mvLkLR7P9z9M57S9loFZK3VFvMSionSry3DlXea-jiy-YK0Vha6a1KJxmDfM5r-1ENb6sFccJHKktl1bcg42wCO4BEM4xAfQ4pmsnI2UyRn9RIp7ZSCFjM8iHn29sz1geL874Ykau5SQwgwIzSWCGZfBqfOZsxddx5erng0wNbqtYK6mCWyxbw9EJFLIQSmdwfyXj8X0isQSyMoNiTfrjgkjZvT4TTk8SdTcm2xqjTJ7B60FRTG802iu-8-H_LX8GNz_uzcz7g8N3j2CTR31ODTiPYaP7tnRPMIzq6qdpp_wGLNgSuA |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How+Do+Executive+Functions+Influence+Children%27s+Reasoning+About+Counterintuitive+Concepts+in+Mathematics+and+Science%3F&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+cognitive+enhancement&rft.au=Dumontheil%2C+Iroise&rft.au=Wilkinson%2C+Hannah+R&rft.au=Farran%2C+Emily+K&rft.au=Smid%2C+Claire&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.issn=2509-3304&rft.eissn=2509-3304&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=257&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs41465-023-00271-0&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2509-3290&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2509-3290&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2509-3290&client=summon |