Cardio-Pulmonary Stethoscope: Clinical Validation With Heart Failure and Hemodialysis Patients

Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of a noninvasive radiofrequency-based device, the Cardio-Pulmonary Stethoscope (CPS), to monitor heart and respiration rates, and detect changes in lung water content in human experiments and clinical trials. Methods: Three human popul...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE transactions on biomedical engineering Vol. 65; no. 5; pp. 1176 - 1180
Main Authors Iskander, Magdy F., Seto, Todd B., Perron, Ruthsenne RG, Lim, Eunjung, Qazi, Farhan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States IEEE 01.05.2018
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0018-9294
1558-2531
1558-2531
DOI10.1109/TBME.2017.2739695

Cover

More Information
Summary:Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of a noninvasive radiofrequency-based device, the Cardio-Pulmonary Stethoscope (CPS), to monitor heart and respiration rates, and detect changes in lung water content in human experiments and clinical trials. Methods: Three human populations (healthy subjects (n = 4), heart failure (n = 12), and hemodialysis (n = 13) patients) were enrolled in this study. The study was conducted at the University of Hawaii and the Queen's Medical Center in Honolulu, HI, USA. Measurement of heart and respiration rates for all patients was compared with standard FDA - approved monitoring methods. For lung water measurements, CPS data were compared with simultaneous pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) measurements for heart failure patients, and with change in weight of extracted fluid for hemodialysis patients. Results: Statistical correlation methods (Pearson, mixed, and intraclass) were used to compare the data and examine accuracy of CPS results. Results show that heart and respiration rates of all patients have excellent correlation factors, r≥0.9. Comparisons with fluid removed during hemodialysis treatment showed correlation factor of r = 0.82 to 1, while PCWP measurements of heart failure patients had correlation factor of r = 0.52 to 0.97. Conclusion: These results suggest that CPS technology accurately quantifies heart and respiration rates and measure fluid changes in the lungs. Significance: The CPS has the potential to accurately monitor lung fluid status noninvasively and continuously in a clinical and outpatient setting. Early and efficient management of lung fluid status is key in managing chronic conditions such heart failure, pulmonary hypertension, and acute respiration distress syndrome.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0018-9294
1558-2531
1558-2531
DOI:10.1109/TBME.2017.2739695