Robustness against Chirp Signal Interference of On-Board Vehicle Geodetic and Low-Cost GNSS Receivers

• Published in: Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) Vol. 21; no. 16; p. 5257
• Main Authors: Dimc, Franc, Pavlovčič-Prešeren, Polona, Bažec, Matej
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 04.08.2021; MDPI
• Subjects: Antennas; Bias; carrier-phase positioning; Experiments; interference mitigation; Kinematics; Monitoring systems; precise GNSS position determination; Receivers & amplifiers; Signal processing; Software
• ISSN: 1424-8220; 1424-8220
• DOI: 10.3390/s21165257

Robust autonomous driving, as long as it relies on satellite-based positioning, requires carrier-phase-based algorithms, among other types of data sources, to obtain precise and true positions, which is also primarily true for the use of GNSS geodetic receivers, but also increasingly true for mass-market devices. The experiment was conducted under line-of-sight conditions on a straight road during a period of no traffic. The receivers were positioned on the roof of a car travelling at low speed in the presence of a static jammer, while kinematic relative positioning was performed with the static reference base receiver. Interference mitigation techniques in the GNSS receivers used, which were unknown to the authors, were compared using (a) the observed carrier-to-noise power spectral density ratio as an indication of the receivers’ ability to improve signal quality, and (b) the post-processed position solutions based on RINEX-formatted data. The observed carrier-to-noise density generally exerts the expected dependencies and leaves space for comparisons of applied processing abilities in the receivers, while conclusions on the output data results comparison are limited due to the non-synchronized clocks of the receivers. According to our current and previous results, none of the GNSS receivers used in the experiments employs an effective type of complete mitigation technique adapted to the chirp jammer.