Review of two immunosuppressants: tacrolimus and cyclosporine

Immunosuppressants are vital in organ transplantation including facial transplantation (FT) but are associated with persistent side effects. This review article was prepared to compare the two most used immunosuppressants, cyclosporine and tacrolimus, in terms of mechanism of action, efficacy, and s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons Vol. 49; no. 6; pp. 311 - 323
Main Authors Lee, HyunJong, Myoung, Hoon, Kim, Soung Min
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Korea (South) The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 31.12.2023
대한구강악안면외과학회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2234-7550
2234-5930
DOI10.5125/jkaoms.2023.49.6.311

Cover

Abstract Immunosuppressants are vital in organ transplantation including facial transplantation (FT) but are associated with persistent side effects. This review article was prepared to compare the two most used immunosuppressants, cyclosporine and tacrolimus, in terms of mechanism of action, efficacy, and safety and to assess recent trials to mitigate their side effects. PubMed and Google Scholar queries were conducted using combinations of the following search terms: "transplantation immunosuppressant," "cyclosporine," "tacrolimus," "calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)," "efficacy," "safety," "induction therapy," "maintenance therapy," and "conversion therapy." Both immunosuppressants inhibit calcineurin and effectively down-regulate cytokines. Tacrolimus may be more advantageous since it lowers the likelihood of acute rejection, has the ability to reverse allograft rejection following cyclosporine treatment, and has the potential to reinnervate nerves. Meanwhile, graft survival rates seem to be comparable for the CNIs. To avoid nephrotoxicity, various immunosuppressants other than CNIs have been studied. Despite averting nephrotoxicity, these medications show increases in acute rejection or other types of adverse effects compared to CNIs. FT has been a topic of interest for oral and maxillofacial surgeons, and the postoperative usage of immunosuppressants is crucial for the long-term prognosis of FT. As contemporary transplantation regimens incorporate novel medications along with CNIs, further research is required.
AbstractList Immunosuppressants are vital in organ transplantation including facial transplantation (FT) but are associated with persistent side effects. This review article was prepared to compare the two most used immunosuppressants, cyclosporine and tacrolimus, in terms of mechanism of action, efficacy, and safety and to assess recent trials to mitigate their side effects. PubMed and Google Scholar queries were conducted using combinations of the following search terms: “transplantation immunosuppressant,” “cyclosporine,” “tacrolimus,” “calcineurin inhibitor (CNI),” “efficacy,” “safety,” “induction therapy,” “maintenance therapy,” and “conversion therapy.” Both immunosuppressants inhibit calcineurin and effectively down-regulate cytokines. Tacrolimus may be more advantageous since it lowers the likelihood of acute rejection, has the ability to reverse allograft rejection following cyclosporine treatment, and has the potential to reinnervate nerves. Meanwhile, graft survival rates seem to be comparable for the CNIs. To avoid nephrotoxicity, various immunosuppressants other than CNIs have been studied. Despite averting nephrotoxicity, these medications show increases in acute rejection or other types of adverse effects compared to CNIs. FT has been a topic of interest for oral and maxillofacial surgeons, and the postoperative usage of immunosuppressants is crucial for the long-term prognosis of FT. As contemporary transplantation regimens incorporate novel medications along with CNIs, further research is required.
Immunosuppressants are vital in organ transplantation including facial transplantation (FT) but are associated with persistent side effects. This review article was prepared to compare the two most used immunosuppressants, cyclosporine and tacrolimus, in terms of mechanism of action, efficacy, and safety and to assess recent trials to mitigate their side effects. PubMed and Google Scholar queries were conducted using combinations of the following search terms: “transplantation immunosuppressant,” “cyclosporine,” “tacrolimus,” “calcineurin inhibitor (CNI),” “efficacy,” “safety,” “induction therapy,” “maintenance therapy,” and “conversion therapy.” Both immunosuppressants inhibit calcineurin and effectively down-regulate cytokines. Tacrolimus may be more advantageous since it lowers the likelihood of acute rejection, has the ability to reverse allograft rejection following cyclosporine treatment, and has the potential to reinnervate nerves. Meanwhile, graft survival rates seem to be comparable for the CNIs. To avoid nephrotoxicity, various immunosuppressants other than CNIs have been studied. Despite averting nephrotoxicity, these medications show increases in acute rejection or other types of adverse effects compared to CNIs. FT has been a topic of interest for oral and maxillofacial surgeons, and the postoperative usage of immunosuppressants is crucial for the long-term prognosis of FT. As contemporary transplantation regimens incorporate novel medications along with CNIs, further research is required. KCI Citation Count: 0
Immunosuppressants are vital in organ transplantation including facial transplantation (FT) but are associated with persistent side effects. This review article was prepared to compare the two most used immunosuppressants, cyclosporine and tacrolimus, in terms of mechanism of action, efficacy, and safety and to assess recent trials to mitigate their side effects. PubMed and Google Scholar queries were conducted using combinations of the following search terms: "transplantation immunosuppressant," "cyclosporine," "tacrolimus," "calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)," "efficacy," "safety," "induction therapy," "maintenance therapy," and "conversion therapy." Both immunosuppressants inhibit calcineurin and effectively down-regulate cytokines. Tacrolimus may be more advantageous since it lowers the likelihood of acute rejection, has the ability to reverse allograft rejection following cyclosporine treatment, and has the potential to reinnervate nerves. Meanwhile, graft survival rates seem to be comparable for the CNIs. To avoid nephrotoxicity, various immunosuppressants other than CNIs have been studied. Despite averting nephrotoxicity, these medications show increases in acute rejection or other types of adverse effects compared to CNIs. FT has been a topic of interest for oral and maxillofacial surgeons, and the postoperative usage of immunosuppressants is crucial for the long-term prognosis of FT. As contemporary transplantation regimens incorporate novel medications along with CNIs, further research is required.Immunosuppressants are vital in organ transplantation including facial transplantation (FT) but are associated with persistent side effects. This review article was prepared to compare the two most used immunosuppressants, cyclosporine and tacrolimus, in terms of mechanism of action, efficacy, and safety and to assess recent trials to mitigate their side effects. PubMed and Google Scholar queries were conducted using combinations of the following search terms: "transplantation immunosuppressant," "cyclosporine," "tacrolimus," "calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)," "efficacy," "safety," "induction therapy," "maintenance therapy," and "conversion therapy." Both immunosuppressants inhibit calcineurin and effectively down-regulate cytokines. Tacrolimus may be more advantageous since it lowers the likelihood of acute rejection, has the ability to reverse allograft rejection following cyclosporine treatment, and has the potential to reinnervate nerves. Meanwhile, graft survival rates seem to be comparable for the CNIs. To avoid nephrotoxicity, various immunosuppressants other than CNIs have been studied. Despite averting nephrotoxicity, these medications show increases in acute rejection or other types of adverse effects compared to CNIs. FT has been a topic of interest for oral and maxillofacial surgeons, and the postoperative usage of immunosuppressants is crucial for the long-term prognosis of FT. As contemporary transplantation regimens incorporate novel medications along with CNIs, further research is required.
Author Kim, Soung Min
Myoung, Hoon
Lee, HyunJong
AuthorAffiliation Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: HyunJong
  orcidid: 0000-0003-4700-2137
  surname: Lee
  fullname: Lee, HyunJong
  organization: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Hoon
  orcidid: 0000-0002-9984-8479
  surname: Myoung
  fullname: Myoung, Hoon
  organization: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Soung Min
  orcidid: 0000-0002-6916-0489
  surname: Kim
  fullname: Kim, Soung Min
  organization: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38155084$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART003028403$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
BookMark eNp9kVtLJDEQhcPisro6_0CkH2Vh2ly7O4LIIHsZEARxn0M6U61xupM26Xbw32_mssPqw-alAvWdU0Wdr-jAeQcInRKcC0LFxfNS-y7mFFOWc5kXOSPkEzqilPGpkAwf7P6lEPgQTWJ8xukVtGQl_YIOWUVSo-JH6OoeXi2sMt9kw8pntutG5-PY9wFi1G6Il9mgTfCt7caYabfIzJtpfex9sA5O0OdGtxEmu3qMfv_4_nDza3p793N-M7udGs75MCVgKoabUtYlNFJQSUCaWgPQtEVDRC1qbKSWRYOBkoXBjFWFZDUwzSUTFTtG37a-LjRqaazy2m7qo1fLoGb3D3NFMCskKVmCr7dwP9YdLAy4IehW9cF2OrxtpO87zj4lo9fkUBaEkbXD-c4h-JcR4qA6Gw20rXbgx6ioxFVKgYsioWf_DttP-XvhBPAtkI4YY4BmjxCs1lmqbZZqnaXiUhUqZZlklx9kxg56sH69sm3_L_4D79ynHA
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_lfs_2024_122995
crossref_primary_10_1097_JS9_0000000000002001
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms25179732
crossref_primary_10_4081_ejtm_2025_13203
crossref_primary_10_3390_fermentation10120645
crossref_primary_10_3390_biology13090744
crossref_primary_10_3390_cimb47010002
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms26062711
crossref_primary_10_3390_pharmaceutics16121487
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajoc_2025_102256
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_trim_2024_102147
crossref_primary_10_2147_OPTH_S476163
crossref_primary_10_3390_ph17111499
Cites_doi 10.2215/CJN.04800908
10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(200004)23:4<633::AID-MUS24>3.0.CO;2-Q
10.1097/01.tp.0000219703.39149.85
10.1007/s001470050708
10.1111/j.1399-0012.1996.tb00458.x
10.2478/s11658-008-0041-6
10.1016/S0169-409X(97)00043-4
10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.07.013
10.1007/BF02044336
10.1097/FTD.0000000000000640
10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.03.018
10.2165/00003495-200666170-00010
10.1016/j.ymthe.2020.09.011
10.1093/ndt/gfh739
10.1097/00007890-200206150-00019
10.1016/j.eururo.2004.02.009
10.1016/j.clinre.2020.04.017
10.1016/S0021-9258(18)42176-X
10.1016/j.transproceed.2016.03.043
10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.08.039
10.1111/j.1399-0012.2006.00604.x
10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c00580
10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.09.021
10.1111/j.1399-0012.2011.01512.x
10.1007/s13346-019-00650-1
10.2165/00003088-200443100-00001
10.1155/2011/480642
10.1056/NEJMoa067411
10.3389/fimmu.2021.663602
10.1097/01.tp.0000234905.56926.7f
10.1016/S0162-3109(00)00190-9
10.1080/08923973.2021.1966033
10.1055/s-0041-1736467
10.1016/j.ejps.2017.12.017
10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68935-6
10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.05.036
10.1016/j.fsc.2022.01.011
10.1111/aor.13551
10.1097/00000637-200207000-00015
10.5415/apallergy.2015.5.3.181
10.3390/cancers11071037
10.1097/00007890-199603150-00032
10.5500/wjt.v6.i4.697
10.1016/j.burns.2010.01.011
10.1016/j.drudis.2015.05.006
10.1097/SCS.0b013e318241b8e0
10.1016/B978-0-12-801238-3.64236-8
10.1111/ctr.13903
10.1055/s-0032-1333314
10.1111/ajt.16152
10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61277-5
10.1034/j.1399-0012.1999.130301.x
10.1681/ASN.2021050628
10.4103/2230-973X.106981
10.1038/nri2035
10.1016/j.trre.2021.100653
10.1016/S0162-3109(00)00192-2
10.3109/00207454.2014.971121
10.1016/j.intimp.2009.12.003
10.1097/00007890-199708150-00012
10.2165/00003088-200241110-00003
10.2174/1389200219666180101104159
10.1097/GOX.0000000000003586
10.1007/BF00314952
10.1080/03639040601155665
10.1007/s40265-014-0316-3
10.1111/ctr.12951
10.1016/S0039-6060(99)70181-9
10.1016/S0959-8049(01)00171-X
10.1517/14740338.2015.1040388
10.1097/00007890-200007270-00017
10.1016/S0032-9592(98)00095-8
10.2146/ajhp140322
10.1002/mus.10195
10.1517/14656566.2013.751374
10.7164/antibiotics.40.1249
10.1097/TP.0b013e31826e5995
10.1097/FPC.0b013e328364db84
10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.01.021
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2023 The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. All rights reserved. 2023
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2023 The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. All rights reserved. 2023
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
5PM
ACYCR
DOI 10.5125/jkaoms.2023.49.6.311
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
Korean Citation Index
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList

MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 2234-5930
EndPage 323
ExternalDocumentID oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_10369173
PMC10761313
38155084
10_5125_jkaoms_2023_49_6_311
Genre Journal Article
Review
GroupedDBID 5-W
8JR
8XY
9ZL
AAYXX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
CITATION
EF.
HYE
KQ8
M48
OK1
PGMZT
RPM
NPM
7X8
5PM
ACYCR
ADRAZ
KVFHK
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-1ec830f79b7ef95291e9cbaee2550f15b5b0c9a96f0e21dc0338693be3a493583
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 2234-7550
IngestDate Sun Mar 09 07:51:20 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:42:32 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 01:40:32 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:04:04 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:55:08 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:03:28 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Keywords Immunosuppressant
Cyclosporine
Tacrolimus
Facial transplantation
Calcineurin inhibitors
Language English
License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c444t-1ec830f79b7ef95291e9cbaee2550f15b5b0c9a96f0e21dc0338693be3a493583
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-9984-8479
0000-0002-6916-0489
0000-0003-4700-2137
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.5125/jkaoms.2023.49.6.311
PMID 38155084
PQID 2908125456
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 13
ParticipantIDs nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_10369173
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10761313
proquest_miscellaneous_2908125456
pubmed_primary_38155084
crossref_primary_10_5125_jkaoms_2023_49_6_311
crossref_citationtrail_10_5125_jkaoms_2023_49_6_311
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20231231
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-12-31
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2023
  text: 20231231
  day: 31
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Korea (South)
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Korea (South)
PublicationTitle Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
PublicationTitleAlternate J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg
PublicationYear 2023
Publisher The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
대한구강악안면외과학회
Publisher_xml – name: The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
– name: 대한구강악안면외과학회
References ref13
ref57
ref12
ref56
ref15
ref59
ref14
ref58
ref53
ref52
ref11
ref55
ref10
ref54
ref17
ref16
ref19
ref18
ref51
ref50
ref90
ref46
ref45
ref89
ref48
ref47
ref42
ref86
ref41
ref85
ref44
ref88
ref43
ref87
ref49
ref8
ref7
ref9
ref4
ref3
ref6
ref5
ref82
ref81
ref40
ref84
ref83
ref80
ref35
ref79
ref34
ref78
ref37
ref36
ref31
ref75
ref30
ref74
ref33
ref77
ref32
ref76
ref2
ref1
ref39
ref38
ref71
ref70
ref73
ref72
ref24
ref68
ref23
ref67
ref26
ref25
ref69
ref20
ref64
ref63
ref22
ref66
ref21
ref65
ref28
ref27
ref29
ref60
ref62
ref61
References_xml – ident: ref37
– ident: ref2
  doi: 10.2215/CJN.04800908
– ident: ref62
  doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(200004)23:4<633::AID-MUS24>3.0.CO;2-Q
– ident: ref72
  doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000219703.39149.85
– ident: ref56
  doi: 10.1007/s001470050708
– ident: ref12
  doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.1996.tb00458.x
– ident: ref11
  doi: 10.2478/s11658-008-0041-6
– ident: ref27
  doi: 10.1016/S0169-409X(97)00043-4
– ident: ref39
  doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.07.013
– ident: ref50
  doi: 10.1007/BF02044336
– ident: ref40
  doi: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000640
– ident: ref16
  doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.03.018
– ident: ref38
  doi: 10.2165/00003495-200666170-00010
– ident: ref90
  doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2020.09.011
– ident: ref48
  doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfh739
– ident: ref51
  doi: 10.1097/00007890-200206150-00019
– ident: ref57
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.02.009
– ident: ref71
  doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2020.04.017
– ident: ref4
  doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)42176-X
– ident: ref23
  doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2016.03.043
– ident: ref45
  doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.08.039
– ident: ref70
  doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2006.00604.x
– ident: ref8
  doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c00580
– ident: ref84
  doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.09.021
– ident: ref34
– ident: ref69
  doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2011.01512.x
– ident: ref9
  doi: 10.1007/s13346-019-00650-1
– ident: ref25
  doi: 10.2165/00003088-200443100-00001
– ident: ref30
– ident: ref36
– ident: ref61
– ident: ref10
  doi: 10.1155/2011/480642
– ident: ref65
– ident: ref5
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa067411
– ident: ref76
  doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.663602
– ident: ref1
  doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000234905.56926.7f
– ident: ref68
  doi: 10.1016/S0162-3109(00)00190-9
– ident: ref77
  doi: 10.1080/08923973.2021.1966033
– ident: ref63
  doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1736467
– ident: ref17
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2017.12.017
– ident: ref66
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68935-6
– ident: ref6
  doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.05.036
– ident: ref88
  doi: 10.1016/j.fsc.2022.01.011
– ident: ref53
  doi: 10.1111/aor.13551
– ident: ref64
  doi: 10.1097/00000637-200207000-00015
– ident: ref21
  doi: 10.5415/apallergy.2015.5.3.181
– ident: ref33
– ident: ref44
  doi: 10.3390/cancers11071037
– ident: ref35
  doi: 10.1097/00007890-199603150-00032
– ident: ref47
  doi: 10.5500/wjt.v6.i4.697
– ident: ref86
  doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2010.01.011
– ident: ref73
  doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2015.05.006
– ident: ref89
  doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e318241b8e0
– ident: ref78
  doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-801238-3.64236-8
– ident: ref74
  doi: 10.1111/ctr.13903
– ident: ref41
– ident: ref58
  doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1333314
– ident: ref83
  doi: 10.1111/ajt.16152
– ident: ref67
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61277-5
– ident: ref46
  doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0012.1999.130301.x
– ident: ref82
  doi: 10.1681/ASN.2021050628
– ident: ref19
  doi: 10.4103/2230-973X.106981
– ident: ref42
  doi: 10.1038/nri2035
– ident: ref55
– ident: ref81
  doi: 10.1016/j.trre.2021.100653
– ident: ref3
  doi: 10.1016/S0162-3109(00)00192-2
– ident: ref59
  doi: 10.3109/00207454.2014.971121
– ident: ref22
  doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2009.12.003
– ident: ref54
  doi: 10.1097/00007890-199708150-00012
– ident: ref26
  doi: 10.2165/00003088-200241110-00003
– ident: ref28
  doi: 10.2174/1389200219666180101104159
– ident: ref87
  doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003586
– ident: ref29
  doi: 10.1007/BF00314952
– ident: ref80
– ident: ref14
  doi: 10.1080/03639040601155665
– ident: ref18
  doi: 10.1007/s40265-014-0316-3
– ident: ref79
  doi: 10.1111/ctr.12951
– ident: ref85
  doi: 10.1016/S0039-6060(99)70181-9
– ident: ref13
  doi: 10.1016/S0959-8049(01)00171-X
– ident: ref75
  doi: 10.1517/14740338.2015.1040388
– ident: ref32
  doi: 10.1097/00007890-200007270-00017
– ident: ref7
  doi: 10.1016/S0032-9592(98)00095-8
– ident: ref24
  doi: 10.2146/ajhp140322
– ident: ref60
  doi: 10.1002/mus.10195
– ident: ref49
  doi: 10.1517/14656566.2013.751374
– ident: ref15
  doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.40.1249
– ident: ref20
  doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31826e5995
– ident: ref43
  doi: 10.1097/FPC.0b013e328364db84
– ident: ref52
  doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.01.021
– ident: ref31
SSID ssj0000627372
Score 2.3910701
SecondaryResourceType review_article
Snippet Immunosuppressants are vital in organ transplantation including facial transplantation (FT) but are associated with persistent side effects. This review...
SourceID nrf
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 311
SubjectTerms Review
치의학
Title Review of two immunosuppressants: tacrolimus and cyclosporine
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38155084
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2908125456
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC10761313
https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART003028403
Volume 49
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
ispartofPNX 대한구강악안면외과학회지, 2023, 49(6), , pp.311-323
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV3fi9QwEB7OE-ReRPFX_UVFX7s2TZo2goiIxynokwv3FpJ0qnu71567XfT-e2c23cWVO3zqQ5OUfpN0vukk8wG8crUJRDRMVjQ0g5XzVeZyV2YaEUXVYI2bg8JfvuqTqfp8Wp4ewFazdQRwdWVox3pS0-Vi8vvn5Tta8MRfJ-Suytdnc9efc-ntQk6UmWiKQykeurnJGPFmvpHwx29zwbosrDhXSJVVxM_jebprBzqCW-TUqF2t9lzXjW7ZXsVK_91c-Ze3Or4Dt0eamb6P8-IuHGB3D97GREDat-nwq09nfDSkX60vog5KN6zepIMLLONzvl6lrmvScBkWPaNDXPQ-TI8_fvtwko3yCVlQSg2ZwFDLvK2Mr7A1ZWEEmuAdIkUReStKX_o8GGd0m2MhmpBTtKqN9Cid4uyofACHXd_hI0i98LpxHsmzBdU6NIIde6MrzYQwiATkFhkbxtriLHGxsBRjMLQ2QmsZWquM1ZagTSDb9bqItTX-0_4lgW7nYWa5KDZfv_d2vrRE_T9RT6kp9pQJvNgaxdJS4fyH67Bf02CG-E_BlDGBh9FIu-dubZxAvWe-XQN-4v6dbvZjU45b8K8gKeTjawd9Akf8IrE-5FM4HJZrfEZcZvDPN9PzD9DK78o
linkProvider Scholars Portal
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Review+of+two+immunosuppressants%3A+tacrolimus+and+cyclosporine&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+the+Korean+Association+of+Oral+and+Maxillofacial+Surgeons&rft.au=Lee%2C+HyunJong&rft.au=Myoung%2C+Hoon&rft.au=Kim%2C+Soung+Min&rft.date=2023-12-31&rft.issn=2234-7550&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=311&rft_id=info:doi/10.5125%2Fjkaoms.2023.49.6.311&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F38155084&rft.externalDocID=38155084
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2234-7550&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2234-7550&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2234-7550&client=summon