Effect of real-time carbon dioxide sensing stylet-assisted endotracheal intubation: A case-crossover manikin simulation study

Endotracheal intubation is an important emergency procedure, especially in critical care settings. Capnography-guided intubation (CGI) is a technology that may enhance procedural efficiency. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of CGI with conventional intubation (CI) using a manikin simula...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe American journal of emergency medicine Vol. 95; pp. 124 - 128
Main Authors Kim, Yoonjic, Joo, Yoon Ha, Kim, Ki Hong, Choi, Dong Hyun, Kang, Hyun Jeong, Hong, Ki Jeong, Song, Kyoung Jun, Shin, Sang Do
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.09.2025
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0735-6757
1532-8171
1532-8171
DOI10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.047

Cover

Abstract Endotracheal intubation is an important emergency procedure, especially in critical care settings. Capnography-guided intubation (CGI) is a technology that may enhance procedural efficiency. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of CGI with conventional intubation (CI) using a manikin simulation. A case-crossover manikin simulation study was conducted with three clinical scenarios: normal airway, cervical immobilization, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. A CO2-exhalation simulation manikin was developed for this purpose. Participants were randomly assigned to perform CGI or CI first, followed by the alternative method. The primary outcome was the first-attempt success rate, and the secondary outcome was the procedure time of intubation. A linear mixed-effects model with a random effect for each subject was applied. A total of 40 participants were enrolled, and 20 in each study group. The first-attempt success rate was higher with CGI than CI across all clinical situations, with statistically significant differences in the normal airway and cervical immobilization settings. Specifically, for the normal airway, the success rate was 40 (100.0 %) for CGI vs. 33 (82.5 %) for CI [abs diff: 17.5 %, 95 % CI: 5.7 %–29.3 %]; for cervical immobilization, 39 (97.5 %) vs. 32 (80.0 %) [abs diff: 17.5 %, 95 % CI: 4.2 %–30.8 %]; and for cardiopulmonary resuscitation, 40 (100.0 %) vs. 38 (95.0 %) [abs diff: 5.0 %, 95 % CI: −1.8 %-11.8 %]. The intubation time was shorter with CGI in the normal airway and cervical immobilization scenarios. The median [interquartile range (IQR)] time for normal airway was 23.5 (19.2–28.4) sec for CGI vs. 31.6 (22.2–59.7) sec for CI, and for cervical immobilization, 24.4 (20.4–30.8) sec for CGI vs. 28.6 (22.6–56.9) sec for CI. In cardiopulmonary resuscitation, the median [IQR] was 23.1 (19.6–31.4) sec for CGI vs. 25.1 (18.6–32.4) sec for CI. In the manikin-based randomized crossover simulation, CGI achieved a higher first-attempt success rate and shorter intubation time than CI in the normal airway and cervical immobilization scenarios.
AbstractList Endotracheal intubation is an important emergency procedure, especially in critical care settings. Capnography-guided intubation (CGI) is a technology that may enhance procedural efficiency. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of CGI with conventional intubation (CI) using a manikin simulation.BACKGROUNDEndotracheal intubation is an important emergency procedure, especially in critical care settings. Capnography-guided intubation (CGI) is a technology that may enhance procedural efficiency. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of CGI with conventional intubation (CI) using a manikin simulation.A case-crossover manikin simulation study was conducted with three clinical scenarios: normal airway, cervical immobilization, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. A CO2-exhalation simulation manikin was developed for this purpose. Participants were randomly assigned to perform CGI or CI first, followed by the alternative method. The primary outcome was the first-attempt success rate, and the secondary outcome was the procedure time of intubation. A linear mixed-effects model with a random effect for each subject was applied.METHODSA case-crossover manikin simulation study was conducted with three clinical scenarios: normal airway, cervical immobilization, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. A CO2-exhalation simulation manikin was developed for this purpose. Participants were randomly assigned to perform CGI or CI first, followed by the alternative method. The primary outcome was the first-attempt success rate, and the secondary outcome was the procedure time of intubation. A linear mixed-effects model with a random effect for each subject was applied.A total of 40 participants were enrolled, and 20 in each study group. The first-attempt success rate was higher with CGI than CI across all clinical situations, with statistically significant differences in the normal airway and cervical immobilization settings. Specifically, for the normal airway, the success rate was 40 (100.0 %) for CGI vs. 33 (82.5 %) for CI [abs diff: 17.5 %, 95 % CI: 5.7 %-29.3 %]; for cervical immobilization, 39 (97.5 %) vs. 32 (80.0 %) [abs diff: 17.5 %, 95 % CI: 4.2 %-30.8 %]; and for cardiopulmonary resuscitation, 40 (100.0 %) vs. 38 (95.0 %) [abs diff: 5.0 %, 95 % CI: -1.8 %-11.8 %]. The intubation time was shorter with CGI in the normal airway and cervical immobilization scenarios. The median [interquartile range (IQR)] time for normal airway was 23.5 (19.2-28.4) sec for CGI vs. 31.6 (22.2-59.7) sec for CI, and for cervical immobilization, 24.4 (20.4-30.8) sec for CGI vs. 28.6 (22.6-56.9) sec for CI. In cardiopulmonary resuscitation, the median [IQR] was 23.1 (19.6-31.4) sec for CGI vs. 25.1 (18.6-32.4) sec for CI.RESULTSA total of 40 participants were enrolled, and 20 in each study group. The first-attempt success rate was higher with CGI than CI across all clinical situations, with statistically significant differences in the normal airway and cervical immobilization settings. Specifically, for the normal airway, the success rate was 40 (100.0 %) for CGI vs. 33 (82.5 %) for CI [abs diff: 17.5 %, 95 % CI: 5.7 %-29.3 %]; for cervical immobilization, 39 (97.5 %) vs. 32 (80.0 %) [abs diff: 17.5 %, 95 % CI: 4.2 %-30.8 %]; and for cardiopulmonary resuscitation, 40 (100.0 %) vs. 38 (95.0 %) [abs diff: 5.0 %, 95 % CI: -1.8 %-11.8 %]. The intubation time was shorter with CGI in the normal airway and cervical immobilization scenarios. The median [interquartile range (IQR)] time for normal airway was 23.5 (19.2-28.4) sec for CGI vs. 31.6 (22.2-59.7) sec for CI, and for cervical immobilization, 24.4 (20.4-30.8) sec for CGI vs. 28.6 (22.6-56.9) sec for CI. In cardiopulmonary resuscitation, the median [IQR] was 23.1 (19.6-31.4) sec for CGI vs. 25.1 (18.6-32.4) sec for CI.In the manikin-based randomized crossover simulation, CGI achieved a higher first-attempt success rate and shorter intubation time than CI in the normal airway and cervical immobilization scenarios.CONCLUSIONIn the manikin-based randomized crossover simulation, CGI achieved a higher first-attempt success rate and shorter intubation time than CI in the normal airway and cervical immobilization scenarios.
Background Endotracheal intubation is an important emergency procedure, especially in critical care settings. Capnography-guided intubation (CGI) is a technology that may enhance procedural efficiency. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of CGI with conventional intubation (CI) using a manikin simulation. Methods A case-crossover manikin simulation study was conducted with three clinical scenarios: normal airway, cervical immobilization, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. A CO2-exhalation simulation manikin was developed for this purpose. Participants were randomly assigned to perform CGI or CI first, followed by the alternative method. The primary outcome was the first-attempt success rate, and the secondary outcome was the procedure time of intubation. A linear mixed-effects model with a random effect for each subject was applied. Results A total of 40 participants were enrolled, and 20 in each study group. The first-attempt success rate was higher with CGI than CI across all clinical situations, with statistically significant differences in the normal airway and cervical immobilization settings. Specifically, for the normal airway, the success rate was 40 (100.0 %) for CGI vs. 33 (82.5 %) for CI [abs diff: 17.5 %, 95 % CI: 5.7 %–29.3 %]; for cervical immobilization, 39 (97.5 %) vs. 32 (80.0 %) [abs diff: 17.5 %, 95 % CI: 4.2 %–30.8 %]; and for cardiopulmonary resuscitation, 40 (100.0 %) vs. 38 (95.0 %) [abs diff: 5.0 %, 95 % CI: −1.8 %-11.8 %]. The intubation time was shorter with CGI in the normal airway and cervical immobilization scenarios. The median [interquartile range (IQR)] time for normal airway was 23.5 (19.2–28.4) sec for CGI vs. 31.6 (22.2–59.7) sec for CI, and for cervical immobilization, 24.4 (20.4–30.8) sec for CGI vs. 28.6 (22.6–56.9) sec for CI. In cardiopulmonary resuscitation, the median [IQR] was 23.1 (19.6–31.4) sec for CGI vs. 25.1 (18.6–32.4) sec for CI. Conclusion In the manikin-based randomized crossover simulation, CGI achieved a higher first-attempt success rate and shorter intubation time than CI in the normal airway and cervical immobilization scenarios.
Endotracheal intubation is an important emergency procedure, especially in critical care settings. Capnography-guided intubation (CGI) is a technology that may enhance procedural efficiency. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of CGI with conventional intubation (CI) using a manikin simulation. A case-crossover manikin simulation study was conducted with three clinical scenarios: normal airway, cervical immobilization, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. A CO2-exhalation simulation manikin was developed for this purpose. Participants were randomly assigned to perform CGI or CI first, followed by the alternative method. The primary outcome was the first-attempt success rate, and the secondary outcome was the procedure time of intubation. A linear mixed-effects model with a random effect for each subject was applied. A total of 40 participants were enrolled, and 20 in each study group. The first-attempt success rate was higher with CGI than CI across all clinical situations, with statistically significant differences in the normal airway and cervical immobilization settings. Specifically, for the normal airway, the success rate was 40 (100.0 %) for CGI vs. 33 (82.5 %) for CI [abs diff: 17.5 %, 95 % CI: 5.7 %-29.3 %]; for cervical immobilization, 39 (97.5 %) vs. 32 (80.0 %) [abs diff: 17.5 %, 95 % CI: 4.2 %-30.8 %]; and for cardiopulmonary resuscitation, 40 (100.0 %) vs. 38 (95.0 %) [abs diff: 5.0 %, 95 % CI: -1.8 %-11.8 %]. The intubation time was shorter with CGI in the normal airway and cervical immobilization scenarios. The median [interquartile range (IQR)] time for normal airway was 23.5 (19.2-28.4) sec for CGI vs. 31.6 (22.2-59.7) sec for CI, and for cervical immobilization, 24.4 (20.4-30.8) sec for CGI vs. 28.6 (22.6-56.9) sec for CI. In cardiopulmonary resuscitation, the median [IQR] was 23.1 (19.6-31.4) sec for CGI vs. 25.1 (18.6-32.4) sec for CI. In the manikin-based randomized crossover simulation, CGI achieved a higher first-attempt success rate and shorter intubation time than CI in the normal airway and cervical immobilization scenarios.
Endotracheal intubation is an important emergency procedure, especially in critical care settings. Capnography-guided intubation (CGI) is a technology that may enhance procedural efficiency. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of CGI with conventional intubation (CI) using a manikin simulation. A case-crossover manikin simulation study was conducted with three clinical scenarios: normal airway, cervical immobilization, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. A CO2-exhalation simulation manikin was developed for this purpose. Participants were randomly assigned to perform CGI or CI first, followed by the alternative method. The primary outcome was the first-attempt success rate, and the secondary outcome was the procedure time of intubation. A linear mixed-effects model with a random effect for each subject was applied. A total of 40 participants were enrolled, and 20 in each study group. The first-attempt success rate was higher with CGI than CI across all clinical situations, with statistically significant differences in the normal airway and cervical immobilization settings. Specifically, for the normal airway, the success rate was 40 (100.0 %) for CGI vs. 33 (82.5 %) for CI [abs diff: 17.5 %, 95 % CI: 5.7 %–29.3 %]; for cervical immobilization, 39 (97.5 %) vs. 32 (80.0 %) [abs diff: 17.5 %, 95 % CI: 4.2 %–30.8 %]; and for cardiopulmonary resuscitation, 40 (100.0 %) vs. 38 (95.0 %) [abs diff: 5.0 %, 95 % CI: −1.8 %-11.8 %]. The intubation time was shorter with CGI in the normal airway and cervical immobilization scenarios. The median [interquartile range (IQR)] time for normal airway was 23.5 (19.2–28.4) sec for CGI vs. 31.6 (22.2–59.7) sec for CI, and for cervical immobilization, 24.4 (20.4–30.8) sec for CGI vs. 28.6 (22.6–56.9) sec for CI. In cardiopulmonary resuscitation, the median [IQR] was 23.1 (19.6–31.4) sec for CGI vs. 25.1 (18.6–32.4) sec for CI. In the manikin-based randomized crossover simulation, CGI achieved a higher first-attempt success rate and shorter intubation time than CI in the normal airway and cervical immobilization scenarios.
AbstractBackgroundEndotracheal intubation is an important emergency procedure, especially in critical care settings. Capnography-guided intubation (CGI) is a technology that may enhance procedural efficiency. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of CGI with conventional intubation (CI) using a manikin simulation. MethodsA case-crossover manikin simulation study was conducted with three clinical scenarios: normal airway, cervical immobilization, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. A CO2-exhalation simulation manikin was developed for this purpose. Participants were randomly assigned to perform CGI or CI first, followed by the alternative method. The primary outcome was the first-attempt success rate, and the secondary outcome was the procedure time of intubation. A linear mixed-effects model with a random effect for each subject was applied. ResultsA total of 40 participants were enrolled, and 20 in each study group. The first-attempt success rate was higher with CGI than CI across all clinical situations, with statistically significant differences in the normal airway and cervical immobilization settings. Specifically, for the normal airway, the success rate was 40 (100.0 %) for CGI vs. 33 (82.5 %) for CI [abs diff: 17.5 %, 95 % CI: 5.7 %–29.3 %]; for cervical immobilization, 39 (97.5 %) vs. 32 (80.0 %) [abs diff: 17.5 %, 95 % CI: 4.2 %–30.8 %]; and for cardiopulmonary resuscitation, 40 (100.0 %) vs. 38 (95.0 %) [abs diff: 5.0 %, 95 % CI: −1.8 %-11.8 %]. The intubation time was shorter with CGI in the normal airway and cervical immobilization scenarios. The median [interquartile range (IQR)] time for normal airway was 23.5 (19.2–28.4) sec for CGI vs. 31.6 (22.2–59.7) sec for CI, and for cervical immobilization, 24.4 (20.4–30.8) sec for CGI vs. 28.6 (22.6–56.9) sec for CI. In cardiopulmonary resuscitation, the median [IQR] was 23.1 (19.6–31.4) sec for CGI vs. 25.1 (18.6–32.4) sec for CI. ConclusionIn the manikin-based randomized crossover simulation, CGI achieved a higher first-attempt success rate and shorter intubation time than CI in the normal airway and cervical immobilization scenarios.
Author Song, Kyoung Jun
Joo, Yoon Ha
Kim, Ki Hong
Choi, Dong Hyun
Hong, Ki Jeong
Shin, Sang Do
Kim, Yoonjic
Kang, Hyun Jeong
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Yoonjic
  surname: Kim
  fullname: Kim, Yoonjic
  organization: Seoul National University Hospital Department of Emergency Medicine, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, South Korea
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Yoon Ha
  surname: Joo
  fullname: Joo, Yoon Ha
  organization: Seoul National University Hospital Department of Emergency Medicine, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, South Korea
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Ki Hong
  surname: Kim
  fullname: Kim, Ki Hong
  email: emphysiciankkh@gmail.com
  organization: Seoul National University Hospital Department of Emergency Medicine, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, South Korea
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Dong Hyun
  surname: Choi
  fullname: Choi, Dong Hyun
  organization: Department of Biomedical Engineering, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, South Korea
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Hyun Jeong
  surname: Kang
  fullname: Kang, Hyun Jeong
  organization: Laboratory of Emergency Medical Services, Seoul National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, South Korea
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Ki Jeong
  surname: Hong
  fullname: Hong, Ki Jeong
  organization: Seoul National University Hospital Department of Emergency Medicine, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, South Korea
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Kyoung Jun
  surname: Song
  fullname: Song, Kyoung Jun
  organization: Seoul Metropolitan BORAMAE Medical Center Department of Emergency Medicine, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 07061, South Korea
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Sang Do
  surname: Shin
  fullname: Shin, Sang Do
  organization: Seoul National University Hospital Department of Emergency Medicine, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, South Korea
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40446597$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkkFv1DAQhS1URLeFP8ABWeLCJcs4duKkQkhVVVqkShyAs-XYE3Ca2MVOKvbAf8fplh4qAdLIvnzv2TNvjsiBDx4Jeclgy4DVb4etHnDallBWW8gl5BOyYRUvi4ZJdkA2IHlV1LKSh-QopQGAMVGJZ-RQgBB11coN-XXe92hmGnoaUY_F7CakRscueGpd-Oks0oQ-Of-Npnk34lzolFya0VL0NsxRm-9ZSJ2fl07PLvgTepodEhYmhpTCLUY6ae-unafJTct4B2Wzxe6ek6e9HhO-uL-PydcP51_OLourTxcfz06vCiMEn4um4xI176BusGpZKcAIxllvta57aFq2Htj1neSy0bk5rNtSt7ZrgTcoDT8mb_a-NzH8WDDNanLJ4Dhqj2FJipdMcCYb0WT09SN0CEv0-XeZ4lIyABCZenVPLd2EVt1EN-m4U38Gm4FyD9wNIWL_gDBQa3pqUGt6ak1PQS6xit7tRZhnceswqmQceoPWxRySssH9W_7-kdyMzjujx2vcYXrog6lUKlCf1_VYt6OsAHjdrAYnfzf43-u_AZ9py8U
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.06.082
10.4097/kjae.2016.69.3.244
10.1007/s00134-002-1290-x
10.1093/bja/aev371
10.1097/ALN.0000000000002815
10.4097/kja.21165
10.1007/s11739-016-1549-9
10.1108/01443570710736985
10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-17-000150
10.1007/s00134-008-1205-6
10.1213/00000539-199709000-00040
10.1007/BF03022067
10.1213/00000539-199809000-00049
10.1213/01.ANE.0000122825.04923.15
10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.05.012
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2025 Elsevier Inc.
Elsevier Inc.
Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2025 Elsevier Inc.
– notice: Elsevier Inc.
– notice: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7T5
H94
K9.
NAPCQ
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.047
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Immunology Abstracts
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
Immunology Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
MEDLINE



Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1532-8171
EndPage 128
ExternalDocumentID 40446597
10_1016_j_ajem_2025_05_047
S0735675725003687
1_s2_0_S0735675725003687
Genre Evaluation Study
Journal Article
GeographicLocations United States--US
GeographicLocations_xml – name: United States--US
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
.1-
.FO
.GJ
.~1
0R~
123
1B1
1P~
1RT
1~.
1~5
23M
354
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5RE
5VS
6J9
7-5
71M
7RV
7X7
88E
8F7
8FI
8FJ
8G5
8P~
9JM
A8Z
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQQT
AAQXK
AATTM
AAWTL
AAXKI
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABBQC
ABFNM
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABOCM
ABUWG
ABWVN
ABXDB
ACDAQ
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIEU
ACIWK
ACPRK
ACRLP
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADEZE
ADFRT
ADMUD
ADNMO
AEBSH
AEIPS
AEKER
AENEX
AEUPX
AEUYN
AEVXI
AFFNX
AFJKZ
AFKRA
AFPUW
AFRAH
AFRHN
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGCQF
AGHFR
AGQPQ
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHHHB
AHMBA
AIEXJ
AIGII
AIIUN
AIKHN
AITUG
AJRQY
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ANKPU
ANZVX
APXCP
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
AZQEC
BENPR
BKEYQ
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C45
CAG
CCPQU
COF
CS3
DWQXO
EBS
EFJIC
EFKBS
EJD
EMOBN
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
EX3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
FYUFA
G-2
G-Q
GBLVA
GNUQQ
GUQSH
HDV
HMCUK
HMK
HMO
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
K-O
KOM
LX1
M1P
M29
M2O
M41
MO0
N4W
N9A
NAPCQ
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OBH
OB~
OHH
OM0
OVD
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PUEGO
Q38
R2-
ROL
RPZ
SAE
SDF
SDG
SDP
SEL
SES
SEW
SJN
SPCBC
SSH
SSZ
SV3
T5K
TEORI
UAP
UHS
UKHRP
UNMZH
UV1
WOW
WUQ
Z5R
ZGI
ZY1
~G-
EFLBG
ESTFP
~HD
AAYXX
ACLOT
CITATION
AFCTW
ALIPV
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
RIG
7T5
H94
K9.
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-8b37ea3b068e591240c4131fdaa6f0891f089ebfb7378a404e692a9db9038e7c3
IEDL.DBID .~1
ISSN 0735-6757
1532-8171
IngestDate Fri Sep 05 15:57:45 EDT 2025
Sat Aug 23 12:35:39 EDT 2025
Wed Aug 13 02:11:47 EDT 2025
Wed Oct 01 05:40:56 EDT 2025
Sat Sep 06 17:17:15 EDT 2025
Sun Sep 14 23:55:05 EDT 2025
Tue Aug 26 17:45:02 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords Respiratory therapy
Emergency medical technician
Capnography
Crossover study
Endotracheal intubation
Language English
License Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c443t-8b37ea3b068e591240c4131fdaa6f0891f089ebfb7378a404e692a9db9038e7c3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
PMID 40446597
PQID 3237710004
PQPubID 1216387
PageCount 5
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_3214317848
proquest_journals_3237710004
pubmed_primary_40446597
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajem_2025_05_047
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_ajem_2025_05_047
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0735675725003687
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_ajem_2025_05_047
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2025-09-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2025-09-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 2025
  text: 2025-09-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
– name: Philadelphia
PublicationTitle The American journal of emergency medicine
PublicationTitleAlternate Am J Emerg Med
PublicationYear 2025
Publisher Elsevier Inc
Elsevier Limited
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Inc
– name: Elsevier Limited
References Grmec (bb0040) 2002; 28
Mort (bb0085) 2004; 99
Koh, Kim, Kim, Ro, Yang (bb0090) 2016; 69
(bb0050) 2006; 2006
Alagarsamy, Madhavan (bb0095) 2025
Hypes, Sakles, Joshi, Greenberg, Natt, Malo (bb0020) 2017; 12
Wang, Chen, Chang, Tsai, Yu, Wu (bb0030) 2016; 105
Choi, Ha Joo, Kim, Lim, Hong, Kang (bb0060) 2022
Mentzelopoulos, Augustatou, Papageorgiou (bb0070) 1998; 87
Frerk, Mitchell, McNarry, Mendonca, Bhagrath, Patel (bb0010) 2015; 115
Matioc, Arndt (bb0025) 2005; 52
Lee, Lee, Ryu, Han, Ko, Tyler (bb0055) 2019; 58
Patra (bb0065) 2009; 53
Wolf, Gravenstein (bb0075) 1997; 85
Aminiahidashti, Shafiee, Zamani Kiasari, Sazgar (bb0045) 2018; 6
Nakagawa, Sagisaka, Takyu, Tanak (bb0035) 2019; 142
Lim, In (bb0080) 2021; 74
Joffe, Aziz, Posner, Duggan, Mincer, Domino (bb0005) 2019; 131
Griesdale, Bosma, Kurth, Isac, Chittock (bb0015) 2008; 34
Kull, Boyer, Calantone (bb0100) 2007; 27
Lim (10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.047_bb0080) 2021; 74
Lee (10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.047_bb0055) 2019; 58
Alagarsamy (10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.047_bb0095) 2025
Frerk (10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.047_bb0010) 2015; 115
(10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.047_bb0050) 2006; 2006
Koh (10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.047_bb0090) 2016; 69
Matioc (10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.047_bb0025) 2005; 52
Mort (10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.047_bb0085) 2004; 99
Grmec (10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.047_bb0040) 2002; 28
Kull (10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.047_bb0100) 2007; 27
Griesdale (10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.047_bb0015) 2008; 34
Choi (10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.047_bb0060) 2022
Nakagawa (10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.047_bb0035) 2019; 142
Wolf (10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.047_bb0075) 1997; 85
Aminiahidashti (10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.047_bb0045) 2018; 6
Mentzelopoulos (10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.047_bb0070) 1998; 87
Joffe (10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.047_bb0005) 2019; 131
Hypes (10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.047_bb0020) 2017; 12
Wang (10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.047_bb0030) 2016; 105
Patra (10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.047_bb0065) 2009; 53
References_xml – volume: 142
  year: 2019
  ident: bb0035
  article-title: Early endotracheal intubation improves neurological outcomes on witnessed OHCA
  publication-title: Resuscitation
– volume: 115
  start-page: 827
  year: 2015
  end-page: 848
  ident: bb0010
  article-title: Difficult airway society 2015 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult intubation in adults
  publication-title: Br J Anaesth
– volume: 87
  start-page: 734
  year: 1998
  end-page: 736
  ident: bb0070
  article-title: Capnography-guided nasotracheal intubation of a patient with a difficult airway and unwanted respiratory depression
  publication-title: Anesth Analg
– year: 2025
  ident: bb0095
  article-title: Usability Evaluation of Object Oriented Applications Using Learning Curves
– start-page: 10
  year: 2022
  ident: bb0060
  article-title: Effect of real-time carbon dioxide sensing stylet assisted endotracheal intubation: a pilot study using the porcine model
  publication-title: Ieee J Transl Eng He
– volume: 2006
  year: 2006
  ident: bb0050
  article-title: Capnography-guided intubation
  publication-title: Proceedings of the IEEE 32nd Annual Northeast Bioengineering Conference
– volume: 27
  start-page: 409
  year: 2007
  end-page: 434
  ident: bb0100
  article-title: Last-mile supply chain efficiency: an analysis of learning curves in online ordering
  publication-title: Int J Oper Prod Manag
– volume: 131
  start-page: 818
  year: 2019
  end-page: 829
  ident: bb0005
  article-title: Management of Difficult Tracheal Intubation: a closed claims analysis
  publication-title: Anesthesiology
– volume: 85
  start-page: 701
  year: 1997
  end-page: 703
  ident: bb0075
  article-title: Capnography during fiberoptic bronchoscopy to verify tracheal intubation
  publication-title: Anesth Analg
– volume: 69
  start-page: 244
  year: 2016
  end-page: 249
  ident: bb0090
  article-title: Encountering unexpected difficult airway: relationship with the intubation difficulty scale
  publication-title: Korean J Anesthesiol
– volume: 105
  start-page: 59
  year: 2016
  end-page: 65
  ident: bb0030
  article-title: The association between timing of tracheal intubation and outcomes of adult in-hospital cardiac arrest: a retrospective cohort study
  publication-title: Resuscitation
– volume: 6
  year: 2018
  ident: bb0045
  article-title: Applications of end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) monitoring in emergency department; a narrative review
  publication-title: Emerg (Tehran)
– volume: 52
  start-page: 993
  year: 2005
  end-page: 995
  ident: bb0025
  article-title: The critical airway
  publication-title: Can J Anaesth
– volume: 58
  start-page: 240
  year: 2019
  end-page: 245
  ident: bb0055
  article-title: Capnography-guided endotracheal intubation as an alternative to existing intubation methods in rabbits
  publication-title: J Am Assoc Lab Anim
– volume: 99
  start-page: 607
  year: 2004
  end-page: 613
  ident: bb0085
  article-title: Emergency tracheal intubation: complications associated with repeated laryngoscopic attempts
  publication-title: Anesth Analg
– volume: 53
  start-page: 692
  year: 2009
  end-page: 695
  ident: bb0065
  article-title: Capnography guided awake nasal intubation in a 4 month infant with Pierre robin syndrome for cleft lip repair-a better technique
  publication-title: Indian J Anaesth
– volume: 34
  start-page: 1835
  year: 2008
  end-page: 1842
  ident: bb0015
  article-title: Complications of endotracheal intubation in the critically ill
  publication-title: Intensive Care Med
– volume: 74
  start-page: 293
  year: 2021
  end-page: 299
  ident: bb0080
  article-title: Considerations for crossover design in clinical study
  publication-title: Korean J Anesthesiol
– volume: 28
  start-page: 701
  year: 2002
  end-page: 704
  ident: bb0040
  article-title: Comparison of three different methods to confirm tracheal tube placement in emergency intubation
  publication-title: Intensive Care Med
– volume: 12
  start-page: 1235
  year: 2017
  end-page: 1243
  ident: bb0020
  article-title: Failure to achieve first attempt success at intubation using video laryngoscopy is associated with increased complications
  publication-title: Intern Emerg Med
– volume: 142
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.047_bb0035
  article-title: Early endotracheal intubation improves neurological outcomes on witnessed OHCA
  publication-title: Resuscitation
  doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.06.082
– volume: 69
  start-page: 244
  issue: 3
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.047_bb0090
  article-title: Encountering unexpected difficult airway: relationship with the intubation difficulty scale
  publication-title: Korean J Anesthesiol
  doi: 10.4097/kjae.2016.69.3.244
– volume: 28
  start-page: 701
  issue: 6
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.047_bb0040
  article-title: Comparison of three different methods to confirm tracheal tube placement in emergency intubation
  publication-title: Intensive Care Med
  doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1290-x
– year: 2025
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.047_bb0095
– volume: 115
  start-page: 827
  issue: 6
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.047_bb0010
  article-title: Difficult airway society 2015 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult intubation in adults
  publication-title: Br J Anaesth
  doi: 10.1093/bja/aev371
– volume: 131
  start-page: 818
  issue: 4
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.047_bb0005
  article-title: Management of Difficult Tracheal Intubation: a closed claims analysis
  publication-title: Anesthesiology
  doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002815
– volume: 74
  start-page: 293
  issue: 4
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.047_bb0080
  article-title: Considerations for crossover design in clinical study
  publication-title: Korean J Anesthesiol
  doi: 10.4097/kja.21165
– volume: 12
  start-page: 1235
  issue: 8
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.047_bb0020
  article-title: Failure to achieve first attempt success at intubation using video laryngoscopy is associated with increased complications
  publication-title: Intern Emerg Med
  doi: 10.1007/s11739-016-1549-9
– volume: 27
  start-page: 409
  issue: 4
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.047_bb0100
  article-title: Last-mile supply chain efficiency: an analysis of learning curves in online ordering
  publication-title: Int J Oper Prod Manag
  doi: 10.1108/01443570710736985
– volume: 53
  start-page: 692
  issue: 6
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.047_bb0065
  article-title: Capnography guided awake nasal intubation in a 4 month infant with Pierre robin syndrome for cleft lip repair-a better technique
  publication-title: Indian J Anaesth
– volume: 58
  start-page: 240
  issue: 2
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.047_bb0055
  article-title: Capnography-guided endotracheal intubation as an alternative to existing intubation methods in rabbits
  publication-title: J Am Assoc Lab Anim
  doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-17-000150
– volume: 34
  start-page: 1835
  issue: 10
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.047_bb0015
  article-title: Complications of endotracheal intubation in the critically ill
  publication-title: Intensive Care Med
  doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1205-6
– volume: 6
  issue: 1
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.047_bb0045
  article-title: Applications of end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) monitoring in emergency department; a narrative review
  publication-title: Emerg (Tehran)
– volume: 85
  start-page: 701
  issue: 3
  year: 1997
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.047_bb0075
  article-title: Capnography during fiberoptic bronchoscopy to verify tracheal intubation
  publication-title: Anesth Analg
  doi: 10.1213/00000539-199709000-00040
– volume: 2006
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.047_bb0050
  article-title: Capnography-guided intubation
– volume: 52
  start-page: 993
  issue: 9
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.047_bb0025
  article-title: The critical airway
  publication-title: Can J Anaesth
  doi: 10.1007/BF03022067
– start-page: 10
  year: 2022
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.047_bb0060
  article-title: Effect of real-time carbon dioxide sensing stylet assisted endotracheal intubation: a pilot study using the porcine model
  publication-title: Ieee J Transl Eng He
– volume: 87
  start-page: 734
  issue: 3
  year: 1998
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.047_bb0070
  article-title: Capnography-guided nasotracheal intubation of a patient with a difficult airway and unwanted respiratory depression
  publication-title: Anesth Analg
  doi: 10.1213/00000539-199809000-00049
– volume: 99
  start-page: 607
  issue: 2
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.047_bb0085
  article-title: Emergency tracheal intubation: complications associated with repeated laryngoscopic attempts
  publication-title: Anesth Analg
  doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000122825.04923.15
– volume: 105
  start-page: 59
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.047_bb0030
  article-title: The association between timing of tracheal intubation and outcomes of adult in-hospital cardiac arrest: a retrospective cohort study
  publication-title: Resuscitation
  doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.05.012
SSID ssj0011454
Score 2.4307737
Snippet Endotracheal intubation is an important emergency procedure, especially in critical care settings. Capnography-guided intubation (CGI) is a technology that may...
AbstractBackgroundEndotracheal intubation is an important emergency procedure, especially in critical care settings. Capnography-guided intubation (CGI) is a...
Background Endotracheal intubation is an important emergency procedure, especially in critical care settings. Capnography-guided intubation (CGI) is a...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 124
SubjectTerms Capnography
Capnography - methods
Carbon dioxide
Carbon Dioxide - analysis
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - methods
Copper
CPR
Cross-Over Studies
Crossover study
Emergency
Emergency medical technician
Emergency procedures
Endotracheal intubation
Esophagus
Female
Gases
Humans
Immobilization
Intubation
Intubation, Intratracheal - instrumentation
Intubation, Intratracheal - methods
Laryngoscopy
Male
Manikins
Physiology
Questionnaires
Respiratory therapy
Respiratory tract
Sensors
Silicones
Simulation
Statistical analysis
Success
Usability
Title Effect of real-time carbon dioxide sensing stylet-assisted endotracheal intubation: A case-crossover manikin simulation study
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0735675725003687
https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0735675725003687
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.047
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40446597
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3237710004
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3214317848
Volume 95
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVESC
  databaseName: Baden-Württemberg Complete Freedom Collection (Elsevier)
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1532-8171
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0011454
  issn: 0735-6757
  databaseCode: GBLVA
  dateStart: 20110101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com
  providerName: Elsevier
– providerCode: PRVESC
  databaseName: Elsevier ScienceDirect
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1532-8171
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0011454
  issn: 0735-6757
  databaseCode: .~1
  dateStart: 19950101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com
  providerName: Elsevier
– providerCode: PRVESC
  databaseName: ScienceDirect Freedom Collection Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1532-8171
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0011454
  issn: 0735-6757
  databaseCode: ACRLP
  dateStart: 19950101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com
  providerName: Elsevier
– providerCode: PRVESC
  databaseName: ScienceDirect Journal Collection
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1532-8171
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0011454
  issn: 0735-6757
  databaseCode: AIKHN
  dateStart: 19950101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com
  providerName: Elsevier
– providerCode: PRVLSH
  databaseName: Elsevier Journals
  customDbUrl:
  mediaType: online
  eissn: 1532-8171
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0011454
  issn: 0735-6757
  databaseCode: AKRWK
  dateStart: 19830701
  isFulltext: true
  providerName: Library Specific Holdings
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3_a9UwEA9jA_EXmd_fNkcEf5P40iZpUn97DMfTx_aDOtxvIWkT6XTteH0D_UH_9t31G4hTQSgtbZMm3F3uruTuc4S8iLEsNI-RRZ8gqHaWMJOowFRIpctKkRcOd3RPTrPlmXx3rs63yNGYC4NhlYPu73V6p62HJ_OBmvOrqpp_AOFU4O5qMOKghg1mlCP6F8j0q59TmAe4-10lNGzMsPWQONPHeLmLgNnoqerQO7HEyu3G6U_OZ2eEjnfJvcF7pIt-gvfJVqgfkDsnw_74Q_KjByOmTaTgDH5lWDmeFm7tm5qWVfOtKgNtMWS9_kzbzXfgGQPnGTld0lDDD-oa8Z1hhApMke-Y9pou4AttYN2UMeCTImTGl6qmbXU5FP-iHUrtI3J2_Obj0ZINBRZYIaXYMOOFDk54npmgcrD0vACblsTSuSxykyd4Cj56LbRxksuQ5anLS59zYYIuxGOyXTd1eEoo2DivgL0xGCGVh3YxS1yaFDpm3BRmRl6OlLVXPY6GHQPMLizywSIfLIdD6hkRI_HtmCEKOs2Cmv9rL31br9AOy7K1iW1Ty-1vojMjaur5i_T9c8SDUTLsNIhIhUbMJC5n5Pn0GlYtbsW4OjTX2CZBz81IIMyTXqImskjcY4f_vL3_nNQ-uYt3fSDcAdnerK_DM_CcNv6wWxqHZGfxdrU8xevq_afVDRFlGdg
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnR1daxQxMNQraF_E755WjeCbhNtskk3Wt6NYrrZ3L7bQt5DsJmWr7pbbK-iD_92Z_TgQq4Kw7MMmswkzk5kJ80XI2xjLQicxsug5FtXOODNcBaZCKl1Wirxw6NFdrrLFufx4oS52yOGYC4NhlYPs72V6J62HL7MBm7Prqpp9AuZUYO5qUOIgho2-Q3alApk8Ibvz45PFautM4LJrhobzGQIMuTN9mJe7CpiQnqqugCd2WbldP_3J_uz00NEDcn8wIOm83-NDshPqR-TucnCRPyY_-nrEtIkU7MEvDJvH08KtfVPTsmq-VWWgLUat15e03XwHsjGwn5HYJQ013FHXWOIZVqhAG_mObu_pHP7QBtZtGWM-KVbN-FzVtK2-Dv2_aFeo9gk5P_pwdrhgQ48FVkgpNsx4oYMTPslMUDko-6QAFPJYOpfFxOQcX8FHr4U2TiYyZHnq8tLniTBBF-IpmdRNHfYJBTXnFVA4BiOk8jAvZtylvNAxS0xhpuTdiFl73ZfSsGOM2ZVFOlikg03gkXpKxIh8OyaJglizIOn_CqVvgwrtcDJby22b2sT-xj1ToraQvzDgP1c8GDnDbhcRqdBYNimRU_JmOwwHF70xrg7NDc7haLwZCYh51nPUFi0S3exw1Xv-n5t6Te4tzpan9vR4dfKC7OFIHxd3QCab9U14CYbUxr8aDspPwYUa4A
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect+of+real-time+carbon+dioxide+sensing+stylet-assisted+endotracheal+intubation%3A+A+case-crossover+manikin+simulation+study&rft.jtitle=The+American+journal+of+emergency+medicine&rft.au=Kim%2C+Yoonjic%2C+MD&rft.au=Joo%2C+Yoon+Ha%2C+PhD&rft.au=Kim%2C+Ki+Hong%2C+MD%2C+PhD&rft.au=Choi%2C+Dong+Hyun%2C+MD&rft.date=2025-09-01&rft.issn=0735-6757&rft.volume=95&rft.spage=124&rft.epage=128&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ajem.2025.05.047&rft.externalDBID=ECK1-s2.0-S0735675725003687&rft.externalDocID=1_s2_0_S0735675725003687
thumbnail_m http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F07356757%2FS0735675725X00061%2Fcov150h.gif