Cranial growth in isolated sagittal craniosynostosis compared with normal growth in the first 6 months of age

Sagittal craniosynostosis (SCS), the most common type of premature perinatal cranial suture fusion, results in abnormal head shape that requires extensive surgery to correct. It is important to find objective and repeatable measures of severity and surgical outcome to examine the effect of timing an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of anatomy Vol. 236; no. 1; pp. 105 - 116
Main Authors Mercan, Ezgi, Hopper, Richard A., Maga, A. Murat
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.01.2020
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0021-8782
1469-7580
1469-7580
DOI10.1111/joa.13085

Cover

Abstract Sagittal craniosynostosis (SCS), the most common type of premature perinatal cranial suture fusion, results in abnormal head shape that requires extensive surgery to correct. It is important to find objective and repeatable measures of severity and surgical outcome to examine the effect of timing and technique on different SCS surgeries. The purpose of this study was to develop statistical models of infant (0–6 months old) skull growth in both normative and SCS subjects (prior to surgery). Our goal was to apply these models to the assessment of differences between these two groups in overall post‐natal growth patterns and sutural growth rates as a first step to develop methods for predictive models of surgical outcome. We identified 81 patients with isolated, non‐syndromic SCS from Seattle Children's Craniofacial Center patient database who had a preoperative CT exam before the age of 6 months. As a control group, we identified 117 CT exams without any craniofacial abnormalities or bone fractures in the same age group. We first created population‐level templates from the CT images of the SCS and normal groups. All CT images from both groups, as well as the canonical templates of both cohorts, were annotated with anatomical landmarks, which were used in a growth model that predicted the locations of these landmarks at a given age based on each population. Using the template images and the landmark positions predicted by the growth models, we created 3D meshes for each week of age up to 6 months for both populations. To analyze the growth patterns at the suture sites, we annotated both templates with additional semi‐landmarks equally spaced along the metopic, coronal, sagittal and lambdoidal cranial sutures. By transferring these semi‐landmarks to meshes produced from the growth model, we measured the displacement of the bone borders and suture closure rates. We found that the growth at the metopic and coronal sutures were more rapid in the SCS cohort than in the normal cohort. The antero‐posterior displacement of the semi‐landmarks also indicated a more rapid growth in the sagittal plane in the SCS model than in the normal model. Statistical templates and geometric morphometrics are promising tools for understanding the growth patterns in normal and synostotic populations and to produce objective and reproducible measurements of severity and outcome. Our study is the first of its kind to quantify the bone growth for the first 6 months of life in both normal and sagittal synostosis patients. Normal growth vs. growth in sagittal craniosynostosis. (A) Mediolateral displacement: positive values indicate medial movement (can be interpreted as suture closure) and negative values indicate lateral movement (mostly associated with the overall growth of the skull). (B) Superoinferior displacement: positive values indicate a superior movement. (C) Anteroposterior displacement: positive values indicate anterior, and negative values indicate posterior movement with respect to basion.
AbstractList Sagittal craniosynostosis (SCS), the most common type of premature perinatal cranial suture fusion, results in abnormal head shape that requires extensive surgery to correct. It is important to find objective and repeatable measures of severity and surgical outcome to examine the effect of timing and technique on different SCS surgeries. The purpose of this study was to develop statistical models of infant (0-6 months old) skull growth in both normative and SCS subjects (prior to surgery). Our goal was to apply these models to the assessment of differences between these two groups in overall post-natal growth patterns and sutural growth rates as a first step to develop methods for predictive models of surgical outcome. We identified 81 patients with isolated, non-syndromic SCS from Seattle Children's Craniofacial Center patient database who had a preoperative CT exam before the age of 6 months. As a control group, we identified 117 CT exams without any craniofacial abnormalities or bone fractures in the same age group. We first created population-level templates from the CT images of the SCS and normal groups. All CT images from both groups, as well as the canonical templates of both cohorts, were annotated with anatomical landmarks, which were used in a growth model that predicted the locations of these landmarks at a given age based on each population. Using the template images and the landmark positions predicted by the growth models, we created 3D meshes for each week of age up to 6 months for both populations. To analyze the growth patterns at the suture sites, we annotated both templates with additional semi-landmarks equally spaced along the metopic, coronal, sagittal and lambdoidal cranial sutures. By transferring these semi-landmarks to meshes produced from the growth model, we measured the displacement of the bone borders and suture closure rates. We found that the growth at the metopic and coronal sutures were more rapid in the SCS cohort than in the normal cohort. The antero-posterior displacement of the semi-landmarks also indicated a more rapid growth in the sagittal plane in the SCS model than in the normal model. Statistical templates and geometric morphometrics are promising tools for understanding the growth patterns in normal and synostotic populations and to produce objective and reproducible measurements of severity and outcome. Our study is the first of its kind to quantify the bone growth for the first 6 months of life in both normal and sagittal synostosis patients.
Sagittal craniosynostosis (SCS), the most common type of premature perinatal cranial suture fusion, results in abnormal head shape that requires extensive surgery to correct. It is important to find objective and repeatable measures of severity and surgical outcome to examine the effect of timing and technique on different SCS surgeries. The purpose of this study was to develop statistical models of infant (0–6 months old) skull growth in both normative and SCS subjects (prior to surgery). Our goal was to apply these models to the assessment of differences between these two groups in overall post‐natal growth patterns and sutural growth rates as a first step to develop methods for predictive models of surgical outcome. We identified 81 patients with isolated, non‐syndromic SCS from Seattle Children's Craniofacial Center patient database who had a preoperative CT exam before the age of 6 months. As a control group, we identified 117 CT exams without any craniofacial abnormalities or bone fractures in the same age group. We first created population‐level templates from the CT images of the SCS and normal groups. All CT images from both groups, as well as the canonical templates of both cohorts, were annotated with anatomical landmarks, which were used in a growth model that predicted the locations of these landmarks at a given age based on each population. Using the template images and the landmark positions predicted by the growth models, we created 3D meshes for each week of age up to 6 months for both populations. To analyze the growth patterns at the suture sites, we annotated both templates with additional semi‐landmarks equally spaced along the metopic, coronal, sagittal and lambdoidal cranial sutures. By transferring these semi‐landmarks to meshes produced from the growth model, we measured the displacement of the bone borders and suture closure rates. We found that the growth at the metopic and coronal sutures were more rapid in the SCS cohort than in the normal cohort. The antero‐posterior displacement of the semi‐landmarks also indicated a more rapid growth in the sagittal plane in the SCS model than in the normal model. Statistical templates and geometric morphometrics are promising tools for understanding the growth patterns in normal and synostotic populations and to produce objective and reproducible measurements of severity and outcome. Our study is the first of its kind to quantify the bone growth for the first 6 months of life in both normal and sagittal synostosis patients. Normal growth vs. growth in sagittal craniosynostosis. (A) Mediolateral displacement: positive values indicate medial movement (can be interpreted as suture closure) and negative values indicate lateral movement (mostly associated with the overall growth of the skull). (B) Superoinferior displacement: positive values indicate a superior movement. (C) Anteroposterior displacement: positive values indicate anterior, and negative values indicate posterior movement with respect to basion.
Sagittal craniosynostosis (SCS), the most common type of premature perinatal cranial suture fusion, results in abnormal head shape that requires extensive surgery to correct. It is important to find objective and repeatable measures of severity and surgical outcome to examine the effect of timing and technique on different SCS surgeries. The purpose of this study was to develop statistical models of infant (0–6 months old) skull growth in both normative and SCS subjects (prior to surgery). Our goal was to apply these models to the assessment of differences between these two groups in overall post‐natal growth patterns and sutural growth rates as a first step to develop methods for predictive models of surgical outcome. We identified 81 patients with isolated, non‐syndromic SCS from Seattle Children's Craniofacial Center patient database who had a preoperative CT exam before the age of 6 months. As a control group, we identified 117 CT exams without any craniofacial abnormalities or bone fractures in the same age group. We first created population‐level templates from the CT images of the SCS and normal groups. All CT images from both groups, as well as the canonical templates of both cohorts, were annotated with anatomical landmarks, which were used in a growth model that predicted the locations of these landmarks at a given age based on each population. Using the template images and the landmark positions predicted by the growth models, we created 3D meshes for each week of age up to 6 months for both populations. To analyze the growth patterns at the suture sites, we annotated both templates with additional semi‐landmarks equally spaced along the metopic, coronal, sagittal and lambdoidal cranial sutures. By transferring these semi‐landmarks to meshes produced from the growth model, we measured the displacement of the bone borders and suture closure rates. We found that the growth at the metopic and coronal sutures were more rapid in the SCS cohort than in the normal cohort. The antero‐posterior displacement of the semi‐landmarks also indicated a more rapid growth in the sagittal plane in the SCS model than in the normal model. Statistical templates and geometric morphometrics are promising tools for understanding the growth patterns in normal and synostotic populations and to produce objective and reproducible measurements of severity and outcome. Our study is the first of its kind to quantify the bone growth for the first 6 months of life in both normal and sagittal synostosis patients.
Sagittal craniosynostosis ( SCS ), the most common type of premature perinatal cranial suture fusion, results in abnormal head shape that requires extensive surgery to correct. It is important to find objective and repeatable measures of severity and surgical outcome to examine the effect of timing and technique on different SCS surgeries. The purpose of this study was to develop statistical models of infant (0–6 months old) skull growth in both normative and SCS subjects (prior to surgery). Our goal was to apply these models to the assessment of differences between these two groups in overall post‐natal growth patterns and sutural growth rates as a first step to develop methods for predictive models of surgical outcome. We identified 81 patients with isolated, non‐syndromic SCS from Seattle Children's Craniofacial Center patient database who had a preoperative CT exam before the age of 6 months. As a control group, we identified 117 CT exams without any craniofacial abnormalities or bone fractures in the same age group. We first created population‐level templates from the CT images of the SCS and normal groups. All CT images from both groups, as well as the canonical templates of both cohorts, were annotated with anatomical landmarks, which were used in a growth model that predicted the locations of these landmarks at a given age based on each population. Using the template images and the landmark positions predicted by the growth models, we created 3D meshes for each week of age up to 6 months for both populations. To analyze the growth patterns at the suture sites, we annotated both templates with additional semi‐landmarks equally spaced along the metopic, coronal, sagittal and lambdoidal cranial sutures. By transferring these semi‐landmarks to meshes produced from the growth model, we measured the displacement of the bone borders and suture closure rates. We found that the growth at the metopic and coronal sutures were more rapid in the SCS cohort than in the normal cohort. The antero‐posterior displacement of the semi‐landmarks also indicated a more rapid growth in the sagittal plane in the SCS model than in the normal model. Statistical templates and geometric morphometrics are promising tools for understanding the growth patterns in normal and synostotic populations and to produce objective and reproducible measurements of severity and outcome. Our study is the first of its kind to quantify the bone growth for the first 6 months of life in both normal and sagittal synostosis patients.
Sagittal craniosynostosis (SCS), the most common type of premature perinatal cranial suture fusion, results in abnormal head shape that requires extensive surgery to correct. It is important to find objective and repeatable measures of severity and surgical outcome to examine the effect of timing and technique on different SCS surgeries. The purpose of this study was to develop statistical models of infant (0–6 months old) skull growth in both normative and SCS subjects (prior to surgery). Our goal was to apply these models to the assessment of differences between these two groups in overall post‐natal growth patterns and sutural growth rates as a first step to develop methods for predictive models of surgical outcome. We identified 81 patients with isolated, non‐syndromic SCS from Seattle Children's Craniofacial Center patient database who had a preoperative CT exam before the age of 6 months. As a control group, we identified 117 CT exams without any craniofacial abnormalities or bone fractures in the same age group. We first created population‐level templates from the CT images of the SCS and normal groups. All CT images from both groups, as well as the canonical templates of both cohorts, were annotated with anatomical landmarks, which were used in a growth model that predicted the locations of these landmarks at a given age based on each population. Using the template images and the landmark positions predicted by the growth models, we created 3D meshes for each week of age up to 6 months for both populations. To analyze the growth patterns at the suture sites, we annotated both templates with additional semi‐landmarks equally spaced along the metopic, coronal, sagittal and lambdoidal cranial sutures. By transferring these semi‐landmarks to meshes produced from the growth model, we measured the displacement of the bone borders and suture closure rates. We found that the growth at the metopic and coronal sutures were more rapid in the SCS cohort than in the normal cohort. The antero‐posterior displacement of the semi‐landmarks also indicated a more rapid growth in the sagittal plane in the SCS model than in the normal model. Statistical templates and geometric morphometrics are promising tools for understanding the growth patterns in normal and synostotic populations and to produce objective and reproducible measurements of severity and outcome. Our study is the first of its kind to quantify the bone growth for the first 6 months of life in both normal and sagittal synostosis patients. Normal growth vs. growth in sagittal craniosynostosis. (A) Mediolateral displacement: positive values indicate medial movement (can be interpreted as suture closure) and negative values indicate lateral movement (mostly associated with the overall growth of the skull). (B) Superoinferior displacement: positive values indicate a superior movement. (C) Anteroposterior displacement: positive values indicate anterior, and negative values indicate posterior movement with respect to basion.
Sagittal craniosynostosis (SCS), the most common type of premature perinatal cranial suture fusion, results in abnormal head shape that requires extensive surgery to correct. It is important to find objective and repeatable measures of severity and surgical outcome to examine the effect of timing and technique on different SCS surgeries. The purpose of this study was to develop statistical models of infant (0-6 months old) skull growth in both normative and SCS subjects (prior to surgery). Our goal was to apply these models to the assessment of differences between these two groups in overall post-natal growth patterns and sutural growth rates as a first step to develop methods for predictive models of surgical outcome. We identified 81 patients with isolated, non-syndromic SCS from Seattle Children's Craniofacial Center patient database who had a preoperative CT exam before the age of 6 months. As a control group, we identified 117 CT exams without any craniofacial abnormalities or bone fractures in the same age group. We first created population-level templates from the CT images of the SCS and normal groups. All CT images from both groups, as well as the canonical templates of both cohorts, were annotated with anatomical landmarks, which were used in a growth model that predicted the locations of these landmarks at a given age based on each population. Using the template images and the landmark positions predicted by the growth models, we created 3D meshes for each week of age up to 6 months for both populations. To analyze the growth patterns at the suture sites, we annotated both templates with additional semi-landmarks equally spaced along the metopic, coronal, sagittal and lambdoidal cranial sutures. By transferring these semi-landmarks to meshes produced from the growth model, we measured the displacement of the bone borders and suture closure rates. We found that the growth at the metopic and coronal sutures were more rapid in the SCS cohort than in the normal cohort. The antero-posterior displacement of the semi-landmarks also indicated a more rapid growth in the sagittal plane in the SCS model than in the normal model. Statistical templates and geometric morphometrics are promising tools for understanding the growth patterns in normal and synostotic populations and to produce objective and reproducible measurements of severity and outcome. Our study is the first of its kind to quantify the bone growth for the first 6 months of life in both normal and sagittal synostosis patients.Sagittal craniosynostosis (SCS), the most common type of premature perinatal cranial suture fusion, results in abnormal head shape that requires extensive surgery to correct. It is important to find objective and repeatable measures of severity and surgical outcome to examine the effect of timing and technique on different SCS surgeries. The purpose of this study was to develop statistical models of infant (0-6 months old) skull growth in both normative and SCS subjects (prior to surgery). Our goal was to apply these models to the assessment of differences between these two groups in overall post-natal growth patterns and sutural growth rates as a first step to develop methods for predictive models of surgical outcome. We identified 81 patients with isolated, non-syndromic SCS from Seattle Children's Craniofacial Center patient database who had a preoperative CT exam before the age of 6 months. As a control group, we identified 117 CT exams without any craniofacial abnormalities or bone fractures in the same age group. We first created population-level templates from the CT images of the SCS and normal groups. All CT images from both groups, as well as the canonical templates of both cohorts, were annotated with anatomical landmarks, which were used in a growth model that predicted the locations of these landmarks at a given age based on each population. Using the template images and the landmark positions predicted by the growth models, we created 3D meshes for each week of age up to 6 months for both populations. To analyze the growth patterns at the suture sites, we annotated both templates with additional semi-landmarks equally spaced along the metopic, coronal, sagittal and lambdoidal cranial sutures. By transferring these semi-landmarks to meshes produced from the growth model, we measured the displacement of the bone borders and suture closure rates. We found that the growth at the metopic and coronal sutures were more rapid in the SCS cohort than in the normal cohort. The antero-posterior displacement of the semi-landmarks also indicated a more rapid growth in the sagittal plane in the SCS model than in the normal model. Statistical templates and geometric morphometrics are promising tools for understanding the growth patterns in normal and synostotic populations and to produce objective and reproducible measurements of severity and outcome. Our study is the first of its kind to quantify the bone growth for the first 6 months of life in both normal and sagittal synostosis patients.
Author Mercan, Ezgi
Hopper, Richard A.
Maga, A. Murat
AuthorAffiliation 1 Craniofacial Center Seattle Children's Hospital Seattle WA USA
4 Seattle Children's Research Institute Center for Developmental Biology and Regenerative Medicine Seattle WA USA
2 Division of Plastic Surgery Department of Surgery University of Washington Seattle WA USA
3 Department of Pediatrics Division of Craniofacial Medicine University of Washington Seattle WA USA
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 4 Seattle Children's Research Institute Center for Developmental Biology and Regenerative Medicine Seattle WA USA
– name: 3 Department of Pediatrics Division of Craniofacial Medicine University of Washington Seattle WA USA
– name: 1 Craniofacial Center Seattle Children's Hospital Seattle WA USA
– name: 2 Division of Plastic Surgery Department of Surgery University of Washington Seattle WA USA
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Ezgi
  surname: Mercan
  fullname: Mercan, Ezgi
  organization: Seattle Children's Hospital
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Richard A.
  surname: Hopper
  fullname: Hopper, Richard A.
  organization: University of Washington
– sequence: 3
  givenname: A. Murat
  orcidid: 0000-0002-7921-9018
  surname: Maga
  fullname: Maga, A. Murat
  email: maga@uw.edu
  organization: University of Washington
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31691965$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp1kc1uGyEURlGVqnHSLvoCFVI37WISGGBm2FSKrP5FkbJJ1ujCMDbWDLiAY_nti2unaqIUFizu-Y4-dM_QiQ_eIvSekgtazuUqwAVlpBOv0IzyRlat6MgJmhFS06pru_oUnaW0IqRAkr9Bp4w2kspGzNA0j-AdjHgRwzYvsfPYpTBCtj1OsHA5l5nZMyHtfEg5JJewCdMaYkG2rmR8iNMTQ15aPLiYMm7wFHxeJhwGDAv7Fr0eYEz23fE9R_ffvt7Nf1Q3t99_zq9uKsM5E5Uk0NWk7XoAAZwRNjDTtJpL1taD7KmWvSbSiFYTbWrZc-i16RnXgoDumo6doy8H73qjJ9sb63OEUa2jmyDuVACnnk68W6pFeFCNJFzIpgg-HQUx_NrYlNXkkrHjCN6GTVI1o7XgraSioB-foauwib58r1Dltpx3e-rDv43-VnncRAEuD4CJIaVoB2VchuzCvqAbFSVqv-siB_Vn1yXx-VniUfoSe7Rv3Wh3_wfV9e3VIfEbmay6Jw
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s10237_022_01588_z
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bonr_2024_101817
crossref_primary_10_3171_2021_1_FOCUS20988
crossref_primary_10_2176_jns_nmc_2024_0168
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jormas_2022_01_002
crossref_primary_10_1242_dmm_049868
crossref_primary_10_1097_SCS_0000000000007362
crossref_primary_10_1111_joa_14056
crossref_primary_10_1097_SCS_0000000000010014
crossref_primary_10_1111_ocr_12759
crossref_primary_10_1097_SCS_0000000000010035
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0294879
crossref_primary_10_1111_joa_14211
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_irbm_2020_02_002
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_77315_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cmpb_2021_106591
crossref_primary_10_1227_neu_0000000000003294
crossref_primary_10_1097_SCS_0000000000007401
crossref_primary_10_1002_adts_202400218
crossref_primary_10_1177_27325016241299005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcms_2024_03_016
Cites_doi 10.1159/000028706
10.1097/GOX.0000000000000216
10.1016/j.anclin.2013.10.007
10.1097/PRS.0000000000003422
10.1055/s-0032-1320063
10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182a75102
10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182997885
10.1097/PRS.0000000000001505
10.3171/jns.1989.70.2.0159
10.1097/00006534-198904000-00025
10.1016/j.bjps.2016.08.006
10.1145/37402.37422
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.025
10.1097/00001665-200501000-00012
10.1016/j.jcms.2016.01.023
10.1097/SCS.0000000000004179
10.1097/PRS.0000000000002049
10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001
10.1002/wdev.227
10.1097/01.prs.0000293762.71115.c5
10.1097/PRS.0000000000002125
10.3171/jns.1999.91.4.0617
10.1007/s40142-014-0042-x
10.1007/s00381-006-0251-z
10.1597/14-310
10.1093/jpepsy/jsh068
10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2015.07.006
10.1542/peds.2014-1634
10.1227/01.NEU.0000371992.72539.8B
10.1371/journal.pone.0127322
10.1016/B978-0-12-810493-4.00011-0
10.1115/1.1287160
10.1002/ajmg.c.31383
10.1097/SCS.0000000000002519
10.1002/ana.410020607
10.1007/s00381-015-2900-6
10.1002/ajmg.a.38540
10.1098/rsif.2017.0202
10.1016/j.jocn.2006.07.001
10.1109/34.24792
10.3171/2013.4.PEDS12445
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2019 Anatomical Society
2019 Anatomical Society.
Journal of Anatomy © 2020 Anatomical Society
Copyright_xml – notice: 2019 Anatomical Society
– notice: 2019 Anatomical Society.
– notice: Journal of Anatomy © 2020 Anatomical Society
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QP
7QR
7SS
7TK
8FD
FR3
K9.
P64
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1111/joa.13085
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
Chemoreception Abstracts
Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)
Neurosciences Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Entomology Abstracts
Technology Research Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Chemoreception Abstracts
Engineering Research Database
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
Neurosciences Abstracts
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE

Entomology Abstracts
CrossRef

MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Zoology
Biology
DocumentTitleAlternate Early growth in normal and synostotic skulls
EISSN 1469-7580
EndPage 116
ExternalDocumentID PMC6904596
31691965
10_1111_joa_13085
JOA13085
Genre article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Seattle Children's Research Institute
– fundername: Seattle Children's Guild
– fundername: ;
GroupedDBID ---
-~X
.3N
.55
.GA
.GJ
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
1OC
24P
29J
2WC
31~
33P
36B
3O-
3SF
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
53G
5GY
5HH
5LA
5VS
66C
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A01
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHHS
AAHQN
AAIPD
AAMNL
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEML
ABGDZ
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABPVW
ABQWH
ABVKB
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACFBH
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACIWK
ACMXC
ACNCT
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACQPF
ACSCC
ACXBN
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
ADZOD
AEEZP
AEGXH
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFPWT
AFWVQ
AFZJQ
AHBTC
AIACR
AIAGR
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMYDB
AOIJS
ATUGU
AZBYB
AZVAB
BAFTC
BAWUL
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
C45
CAG
COF
CS3
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DIK
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DU5
E3Z
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
ESX
EX3
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FIJ
FUBAC
G-S
G.N
GODZA
GX1
H.X
HF~
HGLYW
HYE
HZI
HZ~
H~9
IHE
IPNFZ
IX1
J0M
K48
KBYEO
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
O66
O9-
OBS
OHT
OIG
OK1
OVD
P2P
P2W
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
Q.N
Q11
QB0
R.K
RCA
RIG
ROL
RPM
RX1
SUPJJ
TEORI
TR2
UB1
V8K
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WH7
WHG
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WIN
WNSPC
WOHZO
WOQ
WOW
WQJ
WRC
WXI
WXSBR
WYISQ
X7M
XG1
XOL
YFH
YUY
ZGI
ZXP
ZZTAW
~02
~IA
~WT
AAMMB
AAYXX
AEFGJ
AEYWJ
AGHNM
AGXDD
AGYGG
AIDQK
AIDYY
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QP
7QR
7SS
7TK
8FD
FR3
K9.
P64
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c4435-90a82078daa5a4303f3c67b49372f9d1b9db09c57b0bc29d4adbcd34b50ab8683
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 0021-8782
1469-7580
IngestDate Tue Sep 30 16:00:19 EDT 2025
Thu Sep 04 16:06:38 EDT 2025
Sun Sep 07 23:56:30 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:00:44 EDT 2025
Wed Oct 01 05:08:32 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:02:57 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:36:00 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords 3D
craniosynostosis
shape modeling
morphometrics
geometric morphometrics
Language English
License 2019 Anatomical Society.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4435-90a82078daa5a4303f3c67b49372f9d1b9db09c57b0bc29d4adbcd34b50ab8683
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-7921-9018
OpenAccessLink https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/joa.13085
PMID 31691965
PQID 2323274485
PQPubID 1086345
PageCount 12
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6904596
proquest_miscellaneous_2312547915
proquest_journals_2323274485
pubmed_primary_31691965
crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_joa_13085
crossref_primary_10_1111_joa_13085
wiley_primary_10_1111_joa_13085_JOA13085
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate January 2020
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2020
  text: January 2020
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: Oxford
– name: Hoboken
PublicationTitle Journal of anatomy
PublicationTitleAlternate J Anat
PublicationYear 2020
Publisher Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
– name: John Wiley and Sons Inc
References 1998; 29
1989; 83
2004; 29
2013; 24
2017; 28
2015; 53
2015; 10
2016; 32
2016; 53
2014; 25
2011; 54
2013; 163
2004
1991
2007; 14
2012; 30
2015; 24
2010; 67
2016; 5
2018; 176
1989; 11
1987; 21
2014; 2
2017; 14
2015; 135
2015; 136
2013; 12
2005; 103
1989; 70
1977; 2
2017
2017; 140
2008; 121(1
2016; 137
2000; 122
2009; 681
2012; 26
2005; 16
2016; 27
1999; 91
2007; 23
2016; 69
2014; 32
2016; 44
e_1_2_9_30_1
e_1_2_9_31_1
e_1_2_9_11_1
e_1_2_9_34_1
e_1_2_9_10_1
e_1_2_9_35_1
e_1_2_9_13_1
e_1_2_9_32_1
e_1_2_9_12_1
Sivakumar W (e_1_2_9_40_1) 2015; 24
Schroeder WJ (e_1_2_9_37_1) 2004
e_1_2_9_15_1
e_1_2_9_38_1
e_1_2_9_14_1
e_1_2_9_39_1
e_1_2_9_17_1
e_1_2_9_36_1
e_1_2_9_16_1
e_1_2_9_19_1
e_1_2_9_18_1
Netherway DJ (e_1_2_9_33_1) 2005; 103
e_1_2_9_41_1
e_1_2_9_42_1
e_1_2_9_20_1
Avants BB (e_1_2_9_3_1) 2009; 681
e_1_2_9_22_1
e_1_2_9_45_1
e_1_2_9_21_1
e_1_2_9_46_1
e_1_2_9_24_1
e_1_2_9_43_1
e_1_2_9_23_1
e_1_2_9_44_1
e_1_2_9_7_1
e_1_2_9_6_1
e_1_2_9_5_1
e_1_2_9_4_1
e_1_2_9_2_1
e_1_2_9_9_1
e_1_2_9_26_1
e_1_2_9_25_1
e_1_2_9_28_1
e_1_2_9_47_1
e_1_2_9_27_1
Bookstein FL (e_1_2_9_8_1) 1991
e_1_2_9_29_1
References_xml – volume: 54
  start-page: 2033
  year: 2011
  end-page: 2044
  article-title: A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration
  publication-title: NeuroImage
– volume: 14
  start-page: 20170202
  year: 2017
  article-title: Modelling human skull growth: a validated computational model
  publication-title: J R Soc Interface
– volume: 24
  start-page: 9
  year: 2015
  end-page: 64
  article-title: Pancraniosynostosis following endoscopic‐assisted strip craniectomy for sagittal suture craniosynostosis in the setting of poor compliance with follow‐up: a case report
  publication-title: J Med Case Rep
– volume: 11
  start-page: 567
  year: 1989
  end-page: 585
  article-title: Principal warps: thin‐plate splines and the decomposition of deformations
  publication-title: IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell
– volume: 10
  start-page: e0127322
  year: 2015
  article-title: A statistical skull geometry model for children 0‐3 years old
  publication-title: PLoS One
– volume: 21
  start-page: 163
  year: 1987
  end-page: 169
  article-title: Marching cubes: a high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm
  publication-title: Comput Graph
– volume: 28
  start-page: 2108
  year: 2017
  end-page: 2112
  article-title: The directive growth approach for nonsyndromic, unicoronal craniosynostosis: patient and clinical outcomes
  publication-title: J Craniofac Surg
– volume: 23
  start-page: 269
  year: 2007
  end-page: 281
  article-title: Neurodevelopment of children with single suture craniosynostosis: a review
  publication-title: Childs Nerv Syst
– volume: 26
  start-page: 53
  year: 2012
  end-page: 63
  article-title: Nonsyndromic craniosynostosis
  publication-title: Semin Plast Surg
– volume: 32
  start-page: 143
  year: 2016
  end-page: 151
  article-title: Minimizing blood transfusions in the surgical correction of craniosynostosis: a 10‐year single‐center experience
  publication-title: Childs Nerv Syst
– volume: 2
  start-page: 485
  year: 1977
  end-page: 491
  article-title: Tables of cranial and orbital measurements, cranial volume, and derived indexes in males and females from 7 days to 20 years of age
  publication-title: Ann Neurol
– volume: 29
  start-page: 127
  year: 1998
  end-page: 132
  article-title: Pancraniosynostosis after surgery for single sutural craniosynostosis
  publication-title: Pediatr Neurosurg
– volume: 163
  start-page: 213
  year: 2013
  end-page: 217
  article-title: Perspectives and challenges in advancing research into craniofacial anomalies
  publication-title: Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet
– volume: 29
  start-page: 651
  year: 2004
  end-page: 668
  article-title: Single‐suture craniosynostosis: a review of neurobehavioral research and theory
  publication-title: J Pediatr Psychol
– volume: 2
  start-page: 135
  year: 2014
  end-page: 145
  article-title: Closing the gap: genetic and genomic continuum from syndromic to nonsyndromic craniosynostoses
  publication-title: Curr Genet Med Rep
– volume: 2
  start-page: e243
  year: 2014
  article-title: Intracranial volume in 15 children with bilateral coronal craniosynostosis
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
– volume: 103
  start-page: 137
  issue: 2 Suppl
  year: 2005
  end-page: 141
  article-title: Intracranial volume in patients with nonsyndromal craniosynostosis
  publication-title: J Neurosurg
– volume: 135
  start-page: e615
  year: 2015
  end-page: e623
  article-title: Intellectual and academic functioning of school‐age children with single‐suture craniosynostosis
  publication-title: Pediatrics
– volume: 67
  start-page: 408
  year: 2010
  end-page: 415
  article-title: Little evidence of association between severity of trigonocephaly and cognitive development in infants with single‐suture metopic synostosis
  publication-title: Neurosurgery
– volume: 16
  start-page: 59
  year: 2005
  end-page: 62
  article-title: Blood loss and transfusion rates during repair of craniofacial deformities
  publication-title: J Craniofac Surg
– volume: 681
  year: 2009
  article-title: Advanced Normalization Tools: V1.0
  publication-title: Insight J
– volume: 32
  start-page: 215
  year: 2014
  end-page: 235
  article-title: Anesthesia for craniofacial surgery in infancy
  publication-title: Anesthesiol Clin
– volume: 176
  start-page: 290
  year: 2018
  end-page: 300
  article-title: Single suture craniosynostosis: identification of rare variants in genes associated with syndromic forms
  publication-title: Am J Med Genet A
– volume: 27
  start-page: 410
  year: 2016
  end-page: 413
  article-title: Comparison of intracranial volume and cephalic index after correction of sagittal synostosis with spring‐assisted surgery or pi‐plasty
  publication-title: J Craniofac Surg
– volume: 12
  start-page: 77
  year: 2013
  end-page: 79
  article-title: Pancraniosynostosis following endoscope‐assisted strip craniectomy and helmet orthosis for sagittal suture craniosynostosis in a nonsyndromic patient
  publication-title: J Neurosurg Pediatr
– volume: 69
  start-page: 1464
  year: 2016
  end-page: 1468
  article-title: Review of quantitative outcome analysis of cranial morphology in craniosynostosis
  publication-title: J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg
– volume: 44
  start-page: 626
  year: 2016
  end-page: 631
  article-title: Intracranial volume (ICV) in isolated sagittal craniosynostosis measured by 3D photocephalometry: a new perspective on a controversial issue
  publication-title: J Craniomaxillofac Surg
– volume: 122
  start-page: 364
  year: 2000
  end-page: 371
  article-title: Infant skull and suture properties: measurements and implications for mechanisms of pediatric brain injury
  publication-title: J Biomech Eng
– volume: 24
  start-page: 1331
  year: 2013
  end-page: 1335
  article-title: Laypersons’ ratings of appearance in children with and without single‐suture craniosynostosis
  publication-title: J Craniofac Surg
– volume: 53
  start-page: e95
  year: 2016
  end-page: e100
  article-title: Evaluating children with metopic craniosynostosis: the cephalic width‐intercoronal distance ratio
  publication-title: Cleft Palate Craniofac J
– volume: 70
  start-page: 159
  year: 1989
  end-page: 165
  article-title: Cranial vault growth in craniosynostosis
  publication-title: J Neurosurg
– volume: 121(1
  start-page: 187
  year: 2008
  end-page: 195
  article-title: Intracranial volume and cephalic index outcomes for total calvarial reconstruction among nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis patients
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg
– volume: 137
  start-page: 1557
  year: 2016
  end-page: 1565
  article-title: Age at the time of surgery and maintenance of head size in nonsyndromic sagittal craniosynostosis
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg
– volume: 30
  start-page: 1323
  year: 2012
  end-page: 1341
  article-title: 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network
  publication-title: Magn Reson Imaging
– volume: 83
  start-page: 738
  year: 1989
  end-page: 742
  article-title: Virchow and the pathogenesis of craniosynostosis: a translation of his original work
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg
– year: 2004
– volume: 140
  start-page: 138
  year: 2017
  end-page: 145
  article-title: An appraisal of the cephalic index in sagittal craniosynostosis, and the unseen third dimension
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg
– volume: 25
  start-page: 119
  issue: 1
  year: 2014
  end-page: 123
  article-title: Delayed synostoses of uninvolved sutures after surgical treatment of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis
  publication-title: J Craniofac Surg
– volume: 14
  start-page: 455
  year: 2007
  end-page: 458
  article-title: Intracranial volume measurement of sagittal craniosynostosis
  publication-title: J Clin Neurosci
– volume: 53
  start-page: 394
  year: 2015
  end-page: 401
  article-title: Craniosynostosis
  publication-title: Pediatr Neurol
– start-page: 217
  year: 2017
  end-page: 256
– year: 1991
– volume: 91
  start-page: 617
  year: 1999
  end-page: 625
  article-title: Intracranial volume change in craniosynostosis
  publication-title: J Neurosurg
– volume: 5
  start-page: 429
  year: 2016
  end-page: 459
  article-title: Understanding craniosynostosis as a growth disorder
  publication-title: Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol
– volume: 137
  start-page: 1566
  year: 2016
  end-page: 1567
  article-title: Discussion: age at the time of surgery and maintenance of head size in nonsyndromic sagittal craniosynostosis
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg
– volume: 136
  start-page: 541
  year: 2015
  end-page: 548
  article-title: Comparison of traditional versus normative cephalic index in patients with sagittal synostosis: measure of scaphocephaly and postoperative outcome
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg
– ident: e_1_2_9_21_1
  doi: 10.1159/000028706
– ident: e_1_2_9_45_1
  doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000216
– ident: e_1_2_9_44_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2013.10.007
– ident: e_1_2_9_15_1
  doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003422
– ident: e_1_2_9_19_1
  doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1320063
– volume-title: The Visualization Toolkit: An Object‐Oriented Approach to 3D Graphics
  year: 2004
  ident: e_1_2_9_37_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_47_1
  doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182a75102
– ident: e_1_2_9_10_1
  doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182997885
– ident: e_1_2_9_14_1
  doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001505
– ident: e_1_2_9_13_1
  doi: 10.3171/jns.1989.70.2.0159
– ident: e_1_2_9_35_1
  doi: 10.1097/00006534-198904000-00025
– ident: e_1_2_9_28_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.08.006
– ident: e_1_2_9_29_1
  doi: 10.1145/37402.37422
– ident: e_1_2_9_4_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.025
– ident: e_1_2_9_46_1
  doi: 10.1097/00001665-200501000-00012
– ident: e_1_2_9_38_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.01.023
– ident: e_1_2_9_30_1
  doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004179
– ident: e_1_2_9_5_1
  doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002049
– ident: e_1_2_9_16_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001
– ident: e_1_2_9_18_1
  doi: 10.1002/wdev.227
– ident: e_1_2_9_22_1
  doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000293762.71115.c5
– ident: e_1_2_9_34_1
  doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002125
– volume: 681
  year: 2009
  ident: e_1_2_9_3_1
  article-title: Advanced Normalization Tools: V1.0
  publication-title: Insight J
– ident: e_1_2_9_39_1
  doi: 10.3171/jns.1999.91.4.0617
– ident: e_1_2_9_23_1
  doi: 10.1007/s40142-014-0042-x
– ident: e_1_2_9_25_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00381-006-0251-z
– ident: e_1_2_9_32_1
  doi: 10.1597/14-310
– ident: e_1_2_9_41_1
  doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsh068
– ident: e_1_2_9_20_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2015.07.006
– ident: e_1_2_9_42_1
  doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-1634
– volume: 103
  start-page: 137
  issue: 2
  year: 2005
  ident: e_1_2_9_33_1
  article-title: Intracranial volume in patients with nonsyndromal craniosynostosis
  publication-title: J Neurosurg
– ident: e_1_2_9_43_1
  doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000371992.72539.8B
– ident: e_1_2_9_26_1
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127322
– ident: e_1_2_9_36_1
  doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-810493-4.00011-0
– ident: e_1_2_9_31_1
  doi: 10.1115/1.1287160
– ident: e_1_2_9_11_1
  doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31383
– ident: e_1_2_9_17_1
  doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002519
– ident: e_1_2_9_12_1
  doi: 10.1002/ana.410020607
– volume-title: Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology
  year: 1991
  ident: e_1_2_9_8_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_6_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00381-015-2900-6
– ident: e_1_2_9_9_1
  doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.38540
– ident: e_1_2_9_27_1
  doi: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0202
– ident: e_1_2_9_2_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2006.07.001
– ident: e_1_2_9_7_1
  doi: 10.1109/34.24792
– volume: 24
  start-page: 9
  year: 2015
  ident: e_1_2_9_40_1
  article-title: Pancraniosynostosis following endoscopic‐assisted strip craniectomy for sagittal suture craniosynostosis in the setting of poor compliance with follow‐up: a case report
  publication-title: J Med Case Rep
– ident: e_1_2_9_24_1
  doi: 10.3171/2013.4.PEDS12445
SSID ssj0013094
Score 2.412179
Snippet Sagittal craniosynostosis (SCS), the most common type of premature perinatal cranial suture fusion, results in abnormal head shape that requires extensive...
Sagittal craniosynostosis ( SCS ), the most common type of premature perinatal cranial suture fusion, results in abnormal head shape that requires extensive...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
wiley
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 105
SubjectTerms Age
Bone growth
Cranial sutures
Cranial Sutures - diagnostic imaging
Cranial Sutures - growth & development
Craniosynostoses - diagnostic imaging
Craniosynostosis
Dysostosis
Female
Fractures
geometric morphometrics
Growth models
Growth patterns
Growth rate
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Male
Mathematical models
Methods
morphometrics
Morphometry
Original
Prediction models
shape modeling
Skull
Skull - diagnostic imaging
Skull - growth & development
Statistical analysis
Surgery
Surgical mesh
Surgical outcomes
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Title Cranial growth in isolated sagittal craniosynostosis compared with normal growth in the first 6 months of age
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fjoa.13085
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31691965
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2323274485
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2312547915
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC6904596
Volume 236
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVBFR
  databaseName: Free Medical Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1469-7580
  dateEnd: 20231001
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0013094
  issn: 0021-8782
  databaseCode: DIK
  dateStart: 19160101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://www.freemedicaljournals.com
  providerName: Flying Publisher
– providerCode: PRVFQY
  databaseName: GFMER Free Medical Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1469-7580
  dateEnd: 20231001
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0013094
  issn: 0021-8782
  databaseCode: GX1
  dateStart: 19160101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://www.gfmer.ch/Medical_journals/Free_medical.php
  providerName: Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
– providerCode: PRVAQN
  databaseName: PubMed Central
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1469-7580
  dateEnd: 20231001
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0013094
  issn: 0021-8782
  databaseCode: RPM
  dateStart: 19160101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/
  providerName: National Library of Medicine
– providerCode: PRVWIB
  databaseName: Wiley Online Library - Core collection (SURFmarket)
  issn: 0021-8782
  databaseCode: DR2
  dateStart: 19970101
  customDbUrl:
  isFulltext: true
  eissn: 1469-7580
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0013094
  providerName: Wiley-Blackwell
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnZ3fS90wFMeDCMpe5uZ-uenIxh72UumPJG3wSUQngg7GhMsYlJOk11umray9D_rXe076w3vnBsOXUprT3-c0nyYn3zD2KdKOUidtENlUBCKxMtDSqMAVSBMmRYjWNDj59Ewdn4uTiZyssL1hLEynDzE2uFFk-O81BTiYZjHIa6CpjDMaYB4l0nfRfovvexBC3SswRxjxWdyrCvksnmHP5broAWA-zJNc5FdfAR1tsJ_DpXd5J792563Ztbd_qDo-8t6esac9mPL9zpOes5Wi2mRr3VSVN5ts_bTvhMeNP2q_8QW7OsCaDh2YX-DPfDvjZcVL9GXEV8cbuChbJHtuyaZubiqS8GjKhg9p75zagHlF0Lx4BCRSPi0RSrniGCPtrOH1lONn7yU7Pzr8fnAc9PM3BFYghQU6BOSLNHMAEgTWldPEqtQIJKJ4ql1ktDOhtjI1obGxdgKcsS4RRoZgMpUlr9hqVVfFG8YhBmuEU4BEKiDK0E5LbQ3IAuJUii32eXiTue3FzWmOjct8_MmpIfePdIt9HE2vO0WPvxltD-6Q90Hd5AifCQkqUvGHsRjDkfpYoCrqOdkgMYpUR2jzuvOe8SwJCRNphSXpkl-NBiT1vVxSlTMv-a00ordWeJvebf594fnJ132_8vb_Td-xJzG1IviGpW222v6eFzuIWq1572MKl18m0R1CNScw
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnZ3Zb9QwEIdHpYjjhaNAKRQwiAdeUuWwnVjipSpUS-kWCbVShYQiH9luREkQyT6Uv54Z52CXgoR4i-LJPRN_GU9-BngZKUelkzaIbMoDnlgRKGFk4AqkCZMiRCv6OXl6JCcn_OBUnK7B6-FfmE4fYky4UWT49zUFOCWkl6O81jSXcSauwFUan6OwfPMx_jWGEKpegznCmM_iXlfI1_EMm672RpcQ83Kl5DLB-i5o_zZ8Hk6-qzz5srNozY798Zuu4_9e3R241bMp2-2c6S6sFdUGXOtmq7zYgOvTfhweV36q_cp78HUPOzv0YXaG3_PtnJUVK9GdkWAda_RZ2SLcM0s2dXNRkYpHUzZsqHxnlAZmFXHz8h4QStmsRC5lkmGYtPOG1TOGb777cLL_9nhvEvRTOASWI4gFKtSIGGnmtBaaY3c5S6xMDUcoimfKRUY5EyorUhMaGyvHtTPWJdyIUJtMZskDWK_qqngITMfaGu6kRijlOsrQTglljRaFjlPBt-DV8Chz2-ub0zQb5_n4nVPr3N_SLXgxmn7rRD3-ZLQ9-EPex3WTI38mpKlIzc_HZoxIGmbRVVEvyAahkacqQpvNzn3GoySkTaQktqQrjjUakNr3aktVzr3qt1RI30riZXq_-fuJ5wcfdv3Co383fQY3JsfTw_zw3dH7x3AzpqSCzzNtw3r7fVE8QfJqzVMfYD8BnD8qWw
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnZ3Jb9UwEIdHpYiKC0vZCgUM4sAlVRbbicWpKjyVQgtCVKoQUuQl6YuApCJ5h_LXM-MsvEdBQtyieJI4yUz82Z78DPAsUo5SJ20Q2ZQHPLEiUMLIwBVIEyZFiFb0c_Lhkdw_5gcn4mQNXoz_wvT6ENOAG0WG_15TgJ-5cjnIG01LGWfiElzmEntXREQf4l9TCKEaJJgjDPksHmSFfBrPeOhqY3SBMC8mSi4DrG-BZtfh81j3PvHky86iMzv2x2-yjv95czfg2kCmbLd3pZuwVtSbcKVfq_J8EzYOh1l43Pmp8Ttvwbc9bOrQg9kp9ua7OatqVqEzI7861urTqkO0Z5Zsmva8Jg2PtmrZmPfOaBCY1UTNy2dAJGVlhVTKJMMg6eYta0qG373bcDx79XFvPxgWcAgsRwwLVKgRMNLMaS00x8ayTKxMDUckikvlIqOcCZUVqQmNjZXj2hnrEm5EqE0ms-QOrNdNXdwDpmNtDXdSI5JyHWVop4SyRotCx6ngW_B8fJO5HdTNaZGNr_nUy2l07h_pFjydTM96SY8_GW2P7pAPUd3mSJ8JKSpS8ZOpGOORJll0XTQLskFk5KmK0OZu7z3TVRJSJlISS9IVv5oMSOt7taSu5l7zWypkbyXxNr3b_L3i-cG7Xb9x_99NH8PG-5ez_O3rozcP4GpMIwp-kGkb1rvvi-IhYldnHvnw-gkGQSkK
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cranial+growth+in+isolated+sagittal+craniosynostosis+compared+with+normal+growth+in+the+first+6+months+of+age&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+anatomy&rft.au=Mercan%2C+Ezgi&rft.au=Hopper%2C+Richard+A&rft.au=Maga%2C+A+Murat&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.pub=Wiley+Subscription+Services%2C+Inc&rft.issn=0021-8782&rft.eissn=1469-7580&rft.volume=236&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=105&rft.epage=116&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fjoa.13085&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0021-8782&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0021-8782&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0021-8782&client=summon