Cost-effectiveness of nutritional intervention in elderly subjects after hip fracture. A randomized controlled trial

• Published in: Osteoporosis international Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 151 - 162
• Main Authors: Wyers, C. E., Reijven, P. L. M., Evers, S. M. A. A., Willems, P. C., Heyligers, I. C., Verburg, A. D., van Helden, S., Dagnelie, P. C.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Springer-Verlag 01.01.2013
• Subjects: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Body Weight; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Counseling - economics; Counseling - methods; Dietary Supplements - economics; Elder Nutritional Physiological Phenomena - physiology; Endocrinology; Female; Fracture Fixation - rehabilitation; Health Care Costs - statistics & numerical data; Hip Fractures - economics; Hip Fractures - rehabilitation; Humans; Male; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Middle Aged; Netherlands; Nutritional Support - economics; Nutritional Support - methods; Original; Original Article; Orthopedics; Postoperative Care - economics; Postoperative Care - methods; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Rheumatology; Netherlands; Hip fracture; Cost-effectiveness; Elderly; Nutritional support; Quality of life
• ISSN: 0937-941X; 1433-2965; 1433-2965
• DOI: 10.1007/s00198-012-2009-7

Summary Hip fracture patients can benefit from nutritional supplementation during their recovery. Up to now, cost-effectiveness evaluation of nutritional intervention in these patients has not been performed. Costs of nutritional intervention are relatively low as compared with medical costs. Cost-effectiveness evaluation shows that nutritional intervention is likely to be cost-effective. Introduction Previous research on the effect of nutritional intervention on clinical outcome in hip fracture patients yielded contradictory results. Cost-effectiveness of nutritional intervention in these patients remains unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate cost-effectiveness of nutritional intervention in elderly subjects after hip fracture from a societal perspective. Methods Open-label, multi-centre randomized controlled trial investigating cost-effectiveness of intensive nutritional intervention comprising regular dietetic counseling and oral nutritional supplementation for 3 months postoperatively. Patients allocated to the control group received care as usual. Costs, weight and quality of life were measured at baseline and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated for weight at 3 months and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) at 6 months postoperatively. Results Of 152 patients enrolled, 73 were randomized to the intervention group and 79 to the control group. Mean costs of the nutritional intervention was 613 Euro. Total costs and subcategories of costs were not significantly different between both groups. Based on bootstrapping of ICERs, the nutritional intervention was likely to be cost-effective for weight as outcome over the 3-month intervention period, regardless of nutritional status at baseline. With QALYs as outcome, the probability for the nutritional intervention being cost-effective was relatively low, except in subjects aged below 75 years. Conclusion Intensive nutritional intervention in elderly hip fracture patients is likely to be cost-effective for weight but not for QALYs. Future cost-effectiveness studies should incorporate outcome measures appropriate for elderly patients, such as functional limitations and other relevant outcome parameters for elderly.