Contemporary usefulness of pulmonary venous flow parameters to estimate left ventricular end-diastolic pressure on transthoracic echocardiography

• Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Vol. 36; no. 9; pp. 1699 - 1709
• Main Authors: Güvenç, Tolga Sinan, Poyraz, Esra, Çetin Güvenç, Rengin, Can, Fatma
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 01.09.2020; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Acceleration; Algorithms; Blood pressure; Cardiac Imaging; Cardiology; Catheterization; Congestive heart failure; Deceleration; Diastolic pressure; Echocardiography; Hypertension; Imaging; Intubation; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Original Paper; Parameter estimation; Polyvinyl fluorides; Radiology; S waves; Sensitivity; Velocity; Ventricle; Diastolic dysfunction; Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure; Echocardiography; Pulmonary venous flow
• ISSN: 1569-5794; 1875-8312; 1573-0743; 1875-8312
• DOI: 10.1007/s10554-020-01886-6

Measurement of pulmonary venous flow (PVF) parameters can be used to estimate left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) on transthoracic echocardiography. Despite that, 2016 American Society of Echocardiography (ASE)/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) algorithm gave a secondary role to PVF to assess left ventricular filling pressure. We aimed to test correlations between several PVF parameters, including novel measurements, with LVEDP and to analyze whether PVF parameters have an incremental usefulness over ASE/EACVI algorithm to estimate LVEDP. Seventy-two patients that underwent left and right cardiac catheterization for assessment of heart failure or pulmonary hypertension were enrolled. All patients had a detailed echocardiographic study immediately before catheterization. Patients were categorized into those with an LVEDP < 15 mmHg vs. LVEDP ≥ 15 mmHg to analyze data. Patients with an elevated LVEDP had significantly lower peak S/D velocity ratio, S wave deceleration time, D wave acceleration time and D wave deceleration time (DWDT), as well as higher D wave acceleration rate (DWAR), but only peak S/D velocity ratio (β = − 0.28, p = 0.01), DWDT (β = − 0.33, p = 0.001) and DWAR (β = 0.23, p = 0.03) were independent predictors for an elevated LVEDP. ASE/EACVI algorithm had a sensitivity of 71% and specificity of 74% to predict an elevated LVEDP. When PVF parameters were adjusted for ASE/EACVI algorithm; DWDT and DWAR remained as independent predictors. Sensitivity and specificity of ASE/EACVI algorithm increased to 79% and 96%, respectively, if either DWDT or DWAR was also suggestive of an elevated LVEDP. DWDT and DWAR have incremental usefulness over existing algorithm to determine LVEDP.