Application of a hand-held laser methane detector for measuring enteric methane emissions from cattle in intensive farming
Abstract The hand-held laser methane detector (LMD) technique has been suggested as an alternative method for measuring methane (CH4) emissions from enteric fermentation of ruminants in the field. This study aimed to establish a standard procedure for using LMD to assess CH4 production in cattle and...
        Saved in:
      
    
          | Published in | Journal of animal science Vol. 100; no. 8 | 
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , , , , | 
| Format | Journal Article | 
| Language | English | 
| Published | 
        US
          Oxford University Press
    
        01.08.2022
     | 
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text | 
| ISSN | 0021-8812 1525-3163 1525-3015 1544-7847 1525-3163  | 
| DOI | 10.1093/jas/skac211 | 
Cover
| Abstract | Abstract
The hand-held laser methane detector (LMD) technique has been suggested as an alternative method for measuring methane (CH4) emissions from enteric fermentation of ruminants in the field. This study aimed to establish a standard procedure for using LMD to assess CH4 production in cattle and evaluate the efficacy of the protocol to detect differences in CH4 emissions from cattle fed with diets of different forage-to-concentrate (FC) ratios. Experiment 1 was conducted with four Hanwoo steers (584 ± 57.4 kg body weight [BW]) individually housed in metabolic cages. The LMD was installed on a tripod aimed at the animal’s nostril, and the CH4 concentration in the exhaled gas was measured for 6 min every hour for 2 consecutive days. For the data processing, the CH4 concentration peaks were identified by the automatic multi-scale peak detection algorithm. The peaks were then separated into those from respiration and eructation by fitting combinations of two of the four distribution functions (normal, log-normal, gamma, and Weibull) using the mixdist R package. In addition, the most appropriate time and number of consecutive measurements to represent the daily average CH4 concentration were determined. In experiment 2, 30 Hanwoo growing steers (343 ± 24.6 kg BW), blocked by BW, were randomly divided into three groups. Three different diets were provided to each group: high FC ratio (35:65) with low-energy concentrate (HFC-LEC), high FC ratio with high-energy concentrate (HFC-HEC), and low FC ratio (25:75) with high-energy concentrate (LFC-HEC). After 10 d of feeding the diets, the CH4 concentrations for all steers were measured and analyzed in duplicate according to the protocol established in experiment 1. In experiment 1, the mean correlation coefficient between the CH4 concentration from respiration and eructation was highest when a combination of two normal distributions was assumed (r = 0.79). The most appropriate measurement times were as follows: 2 h and 1 h before, and 1 h and 2 h after morning feeding. Compared with LFC-HEC, HFC-LEC showed 49% and 57% higher CH4 concentrations in exhaled gas from respiration and eructation (P < 0.01). In conclusion, the LMD method can be applied to evaluate differences in CH4 emissions in cattle using the protocol established in this study.
Lay Summary
The hand-held laser methane detector (LMD) technique has been suggested as a potential method for measuring methane (CH4) emissions from enteric fermentation of ruminants in the field. This study aimed to establish a standard procedure for using LMD to assess CH4 production in cattle and evaluate the efficacy of the protocol to detect differences in CH4 emissions from cattle fed with diets of different forage-to-concentrate (FC) ratios which is known to affect CH4 emissions. Experiment 1 was conducted to establish a protocol for measuring and analyzing the CH4 emissions from cattle using LMD. In experiment 2, 30 Hanwoo growing steers were divided into three groups and fed with a diet of high FC ratio (35:65) with low-energy concentrate (HFC-LEC), high FC ratio (35:65) with high-energy concentrate (HFC-HEC), or low FC ratio (25:75) with high-energy concentrate (LFC-HEC). The CH4 concentrations for all steers were measured in duplicate according to the protocol established in experiment 1. HFC-LEC showed 49% and 57% higher CH4 concentrations in exhaled gas from respiration and eructation, respectively (P < 0.01), than LFC-HEC. In conclusion, the LMD method can be applied to evaluate differences in CH4 emissions in cattle using the protocol established in this study.
The hand-held laser methane detector (LMD) technique has been suggested as a potential method for measuring methane (CH4) emissions from enteric fermentation of ruminants in the field. The LMD method can be applied to evaluate differences in CH4 emissions in cattle efficiently using the protocol established in this study. | 
    
|---|---|
| AbstractList | The hand-held laser methane detector (LMD) technique has been suggested as an alternative method for measuring methane (CH4) emissions from enteric fermentation of ruminants in the field. This study aimed to establish a standard procedure for using LMD to assess CH4 production in cattle and evaluate the efficacy of the protocol to detect differences in CH4 emissions from cattle fed with diets of different forage-to-concentrate (FC) ratios. Experiment 1 was conducted with four Hanwoo steers (584 ± 57.4 kg body weight [BW]) individually housed in metabolic cages. The LMD was installed on a tripod aimed at the animal's nostril, and the CH4 concentration in the exhaled gas was measured for 6 min every hour for 2 consecutive days. For the data processing, the CH4 concentration peaks were identified by the automatic multi-scale peak detection algorithm. The peaks were then separated into those from respiration and eructation by fitting combinations of two of the four distribution functions (normal, log-normal, gamma, and Weibull) using the mixdist R package. In addition, the most appropriate time and number of consecutive measurements to represent the daily average CH4 concentration were determined. In experiment 2, 30 Hanwoo growing steers (343 ± 24.6 kg BW), blocked by BW, were randomly divided into three groups. Three different diets were provided to each group: high FC ratio (35:65) with low-energy concentrate (HFC-LEC), high FC ratio with high-energy concentrate (HFC-HEC), and low FC ratio (25:75) with high-energy concentrate (LFC-HEC). After 10 d of feeding the diets, the CH4 concentrations for all steers were measured and analyzed in duplicate according to the protocol established in experiment 1. In experiment 1, the mean correlation coefficient between the CH4 concentration from respiration and eructation was highest when a combination of two normal distributions was assumed (r = 0.79). The most appropriate measurement times were as follows: 2 h and 1 h before, and 1 h and 2 h after morning feeding. Compared with LFC-HEC, HFC-LEC showed 49% and 57% higher CH4 concentrations in exhaled gas from respiration and eructation (P < 0.01). In conclusion, the LMD method can be applied to evaluate differences in CH4 emissions in cattle using the protocol established in this study. Abstract The hand-held laser methane detector (LMD) technique has been suggested as an alternative method for measuring methane (CH4) emissions from enteric fermentation of ruminants in the field. This study aimed to establish a standard procedure for using LMD to assess CH4 production in cattle and evaluate the efficacy of the protocol to detect differences in CH4 emissions from cattle fed with diets of different forage-to-concentrate (FC) ratios. Experiment 1 was conducted with four Hanwoo steers (584 ± 57.4 kg body weight [BW]) individually housed in metabolic cages. The LMD was installed on a tripod aimed at the animal’s nostril, and the CH4 concentration in the exhaled gas was measured for 6 min every hour for 2 consecutive days. For the data processing, the CH4 concentration peaks were identified by the automatic multi-scale peak detection algorithm. The peaks were then separated into those from respiration and eructation by fitting combinations of two of the four distribution functions (normal, log-normal, gamma, and Weibull) using the mixdist R package. In addition, the most appropriate time and number of consecutive measurements to represent the daily average CH4 concentration were determined. In experiment 2, 30 Hanwoo growing steers (343 ± 24.6 kg BW), blocked by BW, were randomly divided into three groups. Three different diets were provided to each group: high FC ratio (35:65) with low-energy concentrate (HFC-LEC), high FC ratio with high-energy concentrate (HFC-HEC), and low FC ratio (25:75) with high-energy concentrate (LFC-HEC). After 10 d of feeding the diets, the CH4 concentrations for all steers were measured and analyzed in duplicate according to the protocol established in experiment 1. In experiment 1, the mean correlation coefficient between the CH4 concentration from respiration and eructation was highest when a combination of two normal distributions was assumed (r = 0.79). The most appropriate measurement times were as follows: 2 h and 1 h before, and 1 h and 2 h after morning feeding. Compared with LFC-HEC, HFC-LEC showed 49% and 57% higher CH4 concentrations in exhaled gas from respiration and eructation (P < 0.01). In conclusion, the LMD method can be applied to evaluate differences in CH4 emissions in cattle using the protocol established in this study. Lay Summary The hand-held laser methane detector (LMD) technique has been suggested as a potential method for measuring methane (CH4) emissions from enteric fermentation of ruminants in the field. This study aimed to establish a standard procedure for using LMD to assess CH4 production in cattle and evaluate the efficacy of the protocol to detect differences in CH4 emissions from cattle fed with diets of different forage-to-concentrate (FC) ratios which is known to affect CH4 emissions. Experiment 1 was conducted to establish a protocol for measuring and analyzing the CH4 emissions from cattle using LMD. In experiment 2, 30 Hanwoo growing steers were divided into three groups and fed with a diet of high FC ratio (35:65) with low-energy concentrate (HFC-LEC), high FC ratio (35:65) with high-energy concentrate (HFC-HEC), or low FC ratio (25:75) with high-energy concentrate (LFC-HEC). The CH4 concentrations for all steers were measured in duplicate according to the protocol established in experiment 1. HFC-LEC showed 49% and 57% higher CH4 concentrations in exhaled gas from respiration and eructation, respectively (P < 0.01), than LFC-HEC. In conclusion, the LMD method can be applied to evaluate differences in CH4 emissions in cattle using the protocol established in this study. The hand-held laser methane detector (LMD) technique has been suggested as a potential method for measuring methane (CH4) emissions from enteric fermentation of ruminants in the field. The LMD method can be applied to evaluate differences in CH4 emissions in cattle efficiently using the protocol established in this study. The hand-held laser methane detector (LMD) technique has been suggested as an alternative method for measuring methane (CH4) emissions from enteric fermentation of ruminants in the field. This study aimed to establish a standard procedure for using LMD to assess CH4 production in cattle and evaluate the efficacy of the protocol to detect differences in CH4 emissions from cattle fed with diets of different forage-to-concentrate (FC) ratios. Experiment 1 was conducted with four Hanwoo steers (584 ± 57.4 kg body weight [BW]) individually housed in metabolic cages. The LMD was installed on a tripod aimed at the animal's nostril, and the CH4 concentration in the exhaled gas was measured for 6 min every hour for 2 consecutive days. For the data processing, the CH4 concentration peaks were identified by the automatic multi-scale peak detection algorithm. The peaks were then separated into those from respiration and eructation by fitting combinations of two of the four distribution functions (normal, log-normal, gamma, and Weibull) using the mixdist R package. In addition, the most appropriate time and number of consecutive measurements to represent the daily average CH4 concentration were determined. In experiment 2, 30 Hanwoo growing steers (343 ± 24.6 kg BW), blocked by BW, were randomly divided into three groups. Three different diets were provided to each group: high FC ratio (35:65) with low-energy concentrate (HFC-LEC), high FC ratio with high-energy concentrate (HFC-HEC), and low FC ratio (25:75) with high-energy concentrate (LFC-HEC). After 10 d of feeding the diets, the CH4 concentrations for all steers were measured and analyzed in duplicate according to the protocol established in experiment 1. In experiment 1, the mean correlation coefficient between the CH4 concentration from respiration and eructation was highest when a combination of two normal distributions was assumed (r = 0.79). The most appropriate measurement times were as follows: 2 h and 1 h before, and 1 h and 2 h after morning feeding. Compared with LFC-HEC, HFC-LEC showed 49% and 57% higher CH4 concentrations in exhaled gas from respiration and eructation (P < 0.01). In conclusion, the LMD method can be applied to evaluate differences in CH4 emissions in cattle using the protocol established in this study.The hand-held laser methane detector (LMD) technique has been suggested as an alternative method for measuring methane (CH4) emissions from enteric fermentation of ruminants in the field. This study aimed to establish a standard procedure for using LMD to assess CH4 production in cattle and evaluate the efficacy of the protocol to detect differences in CH4 emissions from cattle fed with diets of different forage-to-concentrate (FC) ratios. Experiment 1 was conducted with four Hanwoo steers (584 ± 57.4 kg body weight [BW]) individually housed in metabolic cages. The LMD was installed on a tripod aimed at the animal's nostril, and the CH4 concentration in the exhaled gas was measured for 6 min every hour for 2 consecutive days. For the data processing, the CH4 concentration peaks were identified by the automatic multi-scale peak detection algorithm. The peaks were then separated into those from respiration and eructation by fitting combinations of two of the four distribution functions (normal, log-normal, gamma, and Weibull) using the mixdist R package. In addition, the most appropriate time and number of consecutive measurements to represent the daily average CH4 concentration were determined. In experiment 2, 30 Hanwoo growing steers (343 ± 24.6 kg BW), blocked by BW, were randomly divided into three groups. Three different diets were provided to each group: high FC ratio (35:65) with low-energy concentrate (HFC-LEC), high FC ratio with high-energy concentrate (HFC-HEC), and low FC ratio (25:75) with high-energy concentrate (LFC-HEC). After 10 d of feeding the diets, the CH4 concentrations for all steers were measured and analyzed in duplicate according to the protocol established in experiment 1. In experiment 1, the mean correlation coefficient between the CH4 concentration from respiration and eructation was highest when a combination of two normal distributions was assumed (r = 0.79). The most appropriate measurement times were as follows: 2 h and 1 h before, and 1 h and 2 h after morning feeding. Compared with LFC-HEC, HFC-LEC showed 49% and 57% higher CH4 concentrations in exhaled gas from respiration and eructation (P < 0.01). In conclusion, the LMD method can be applied to evaluate differences in CH4 emissions in cattle using the protocol established in this study. The hand-held laser methane detector (LMD) technique has been suggested as an alternative method for measuring methane (CH4) emissions from enteric fermentation of ruminants in the field. This study aimed to establish a standard procedure for using LMD to assess CH4 production in cattle and evaluate the efficacy of the protocol to detect differences in CH4 emissions from cattle fed with diets of different forage-to-concentrate (FC) ratios. Experiment 1 was conducted with four Hanwoo steers (584 ± 57.4 kg body weight [BW]) individually housed in metabolic cages. The LMD was installed on a tripod aimed at the animal’s nostril, and the CH4 concentration in the exhaled gas was measured for 6 min every hour for 2 consecutive days. For the data processing, the CH4 concentration peaks were identified by the automatic multi-scale peak detection algorithm. The peaks were then separated into those from respiration and eructation by fitting combinations of two of the four distribution functions (normal, log-normal, gamma, and Weibull) using the mixdist R package. In addition, the most appropriate time and number of consecutive measurements to represent the daily average CH4 concentration were determined. In experiment 2, 30 Hanwoo growing steers (343 ± 24.6 kg BW), blocked by BW, were randomly divided into three groups. Three different diets were provided to each group: high FC ratio (35:65) with low-energy concentrate (HFC-LEC), high FC ratio with high-energy concentrate (HFC-HEC), and low FC ratio (25:75) with high-energy concentrate (LFC-HEC). After 10 d of feeding the diets, the CH4 concentrations for all steers were measured and analyzed in duplicate according to the protocol established in experiment 1. In experiment 1, the mean correlation coefficient between the CH4 concentration from respiration and eructation was highest when a combination of two normal distributions was assumed (r = 0.79). The most appropriate measurement times were as follows: 2 h and 1 h before, and 1 h and 2 h after morning feeding. Compared with LFC-HEC, HFC-LEC showed 49% and 57% higher CH4 concentrations in exhaled gas from respiration and eructation (P < 0.01). In conclusion, the LMD method can be applied to evaluate differences in CH4 emissions in cattle using the protocol established in this study. The hand-held laser methane detector (LMD) technique has been suggested as a potential method for measuring methane (CH4) emissions from enteric fermentation of ruminants in the field. The LMD method can be applied to evaluate differences in CH4 emissions in cattle efficiently using the protocol established in this study.  | 
    
| Author | Cho, Hyunjin Baek, Yulchang Jeong, Sinyong Lee, Seul Seo, Seongwon Kang, Kyewon Lee, Mingyung Jeon, Seoyoung Oh, Joonpyo  | 
    
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Kyewon surname: Kang fullname: Kang, Kyewon – sequence: 2 givenname: Hyunjin orcidid: 0000-0001-8676-1481 surname: Cho fullname: Cho, Hyunjin – sequence: 3 givenname: Sinyong surname: Jeong fullname: Jeong, Sinyong – sequence: 4 givenname: Seoyoung surname: Jeon fullname: Jeon, Seoyoung – sequence: 5 givenname: Mingyung surname: Lee fullname: Lee, Mingyung – sequence: 6 givenname: Seul surname: Lee fullname: Lee, Seul – sequence: 7 givenname: Yulchang surname: Baek fullname: Baek, Yulchang – sequence: 8 givenname: Joonpyo surname: Oh fullname: Oh, Joonpyo – sequence: 9 givenname: Seongwon orcidid: 0000-0002-4131-0545 surname: Seo fullname: Seo, Seongwon email: swseo@cnu.kr  | 
    
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35671336$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed | 
    
| BookMark | eNqFkt1rFTEQxYNU7G31yXcJCCLo2nxsNrsvhVL8goIv-hxmc2d7c91N1iRbqX-9qfdataBCIDDzO4eZkxyRAx88EvKYs1ecdfJkC-kkfQYrOL9HVlwJVUneyAOyYkzwqm25OCRHKW0Z40J16gE5lKrRXMpmRb6dzfPoLGQXPA0DBboBv642OK7pCAkjnTCXEtI1ZrQ5RDqEmyKkJTp_SdFnjM7eYji5lIpZokMMEy3OeUTqfDkZfXJXSAeIU5E-JPcHGBM-2t_H5NOb1x_P31UXH96-Pz-7qGxds1wNbae07KDVtm24bpXCTtcIAChqwbrS61nNFfQaJa4ZbxWTFnsu7dCoHuQxebnzXfwM119hHM0c3QTx2nBmbiI0JUKzj7Dgpzt8XvoJ17YsGOGXJIAzf3a825jLcGU62WrVtcXg-d4ghi8LpmxKJBbHscQTlmREo2tZayl0QZ_eQbdhib6kYYTmQjaq4apQT36f6HaUn69YgBc7wMaQUsThPwvyO7R1-ccHKOu48S-aZztNWOZ_mn8HKkrP6w | 
    
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3389_fvets_2023_1168237 crossref_primary_10_3390_en16093867 crossref_primary_10_7744_kjoas_510304 crossref_primary_10_3390_ani14223195 crossref_primary_10_5187_ait_2024_11_2_93 crossref_primary_10_3390_ani14010139 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_atech_2025_100789 crossref_primary_10_1186_s42523_024_00325_4 crossref_primary_10_3390_ani14030469  | 
    
| Cites_doi | 10.5713/ab.20.0739 10.1111/gfs.12353 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.02.008 10.5194/aab-63-113-2020 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.07.002 10.1017/S0022029900025231 10.1016/j.compag.2017.10.024 10.1016/j.animal.2020.100070 10.3390/a5040588 10.2527/jas.2014-7676 10.1016/j.compag.2018.04.010 10.1186/s13570-018-0121-9 10.5713/ajas.18.0468 10.1079/BJN19760053 10.1071/EA07199 10.4314/sajas.v44i5.3 10.3923/javaa.2012.3228.3233 10.3390/agriculture10120628 10.2527/1995.7382483x 10.3168/jds.2019-16245 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2003.10.006 10.1071/AN14345 10.1016/j.compag.2009.05.008 10.1016/j.aninu.2015.11.009 10.3390/ani9100837 10.1080/00288233.1983.10427032 10.3168/jds.2019-17101 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.02.005 10.3390/ani10040606 10.1186/s40781-016-0117-1 10.3920/978-90-8686-712-7_19 10.3390/ani9080563 10.1016/j.compag.2018.08.024 10.1071/AN14235 10.3168/jds.2013-7234 10.3390/methane1010004  | 
    
| ContentType | Journal Article | 
    
| Copyright | The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2022 The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.  | 
    
| Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2022 – notice: The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.  | 
    
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM K9. U9A 7X8 5PM ADTOC UNPAY  | 
    
| DOI | 10.1093/jas/skac211 | 
    
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) Unpaywall for CDI: Periodical Content Unpaywall  | 
    
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Career and Technical Education (Alumni Edition) MEDLINE - Academic  | 
    
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE CrossRef ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic  | 
    
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: UNPAY name: Unpaywall url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://unpaywall.org/ sourceTypes: Open Access Repository  | 
    
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc | 
    
| Discipline | Agriculture | 
    
| EISSN | 1525-3163 | 
    
| ExternalDocumentID | oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:9387598 PMC9387598 35671336 10_1093_jas_skac211 10.1093/jas/skac211  | 
    
| Genre | Randomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary Journal Article  | 
    
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development grantid: PJ01477801 – fundername: ; grantid: PJ01477801  | 
    
| GroupedDBID | --- ..I .55 .GJ 0R~ 186 18M 29J 2WC 48X 53G 5GY 5RE 5WD 7RQ 7X2 7X7 7XC 88E 88I 8AF 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8FW 8G5 8R4 8R5 AAHBH AAIMJ AAPQZ AAPXW AARHZ AAUAY AAUQX AAVAP AAWDT ABCQX ABDFA ABEJV ABGNP ABIME ABJCF ABJNI ABMNT ABPIB ABPQP ABPTD ABUWG ABVGC ABWST ABXVV ABXZS ABZEO ACFRR ACGFO ACGFS ACGOD ACIWK ACPRK ACQAM ACUTJ ACVCV ACZBC ADBBV ADFRT ADGKP ADGZP ADIPN ADNBA ADNWM ADQBN ADRTK ADVEK AELWJ AENEX AETBJ AEUYN AFFZL AFGWE AFKRA AFRAH AFYAG AGINJ AGKRT AGMDO AGQXC AHMBA AI. AJDVS AJEEA AJNCP ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALXQX ANFBD AOIJS APJGH AQDSO ASAOO ATCPS ATDFG ATGXG AZQEC BAYMD BBNVY BCRHZ BENPR BES BEYMZ BGLVJ BHPHI BKOMP BPHCQ BVXVI C1A CCPQU CS3 DU5 DWQXO E3Z EBS ECGQY EJD ELUNK EYRJQ F5P F9R FHSFR FJW FLUFQ FOEOM FQBLK FYUFA GAUVT GNUQQ GUQSH H13 HCIFZ HMCUK HYE INIJC JXSIZ KBUDW KOP KSI KSN L6V L7B LK8 M0K M1P M2O M2P M2Q M7P M7S MBTAY ML0 MV1 MW2 NEJ NHB NLBLG NOMLY NVLIB O9- OBOKY ODMLO OJZSN OK1 OWPYF P-O P0- P2P PATMY PHGZT PQQKQ PRG PROAC PSQYO PTHSS PYCSY Q2X ROX RPM RUSNO RWL RXW S0X SJN TAE TCN TR2 TWZ UKHRP VH1 W8F WH7 WOQ X7M XOL YKV YR5 YXANX ZCG ZGI ZXP ~KM AAYXX AHGBF AJBYB CITATION 3V. 88A CGR CUY CVF DIK ECM EIF M0L NPM TJA ABUFD K9. U9A 7X8 5PM ADTOC PHGZM PJZUB PPXIY PQGLB UNPAY  | 
    
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-f895739a87c8617855e974eaaae24209739b0415ab7e3ed018503ceb13cf65ba3 | 
    
| IEDL.DBID | UNPAY | 
    
| ISSN | 0021-8812 1525-3163 1525-3015 1544-7847  | 
    
| IngestDate | Sun Oct 26 04:01:29 EDT 2025 Tue Sep 30 17:13:23 EDT 2025 Sun Sep 28 01:09:59 EDT 2025 Tue Oct 07 06:07:28 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:23:17 EST 2025 Wed Oct 01 01:15:54 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:54:59 EDT 2025 Wed Apr 02 07:00:08 EDT 2025  | 
    
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true | 
    
| IsOpenAccess | true | 
    
| IsPeerReviewed | true | 
    
| IsScholarly | true | 
    
| Issue | 8 | 
    
| Keywords | eructation cattle respiration forage-to-concentrate ratio laser methane detector methane emission  | 
    
| Language | English | 
    
| License | This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights) https://academic.oup.com/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.  | 
    
| LinkModel | DirectLink | 
    
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c440t-f895739a87c8617855e974eaaae24209739b0415ab7e3ed018503ceb13cf65ba3 | 
    
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3  | 
    
| ORCID | 0000-0001-8676-1481 0000-0002-4131-0545  | 
    
| OpenAccessLink | https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/9387598 | 
    
| PMID | 35671336 | 
    
| PQID | 2712365615 | 
    
| PQPubID | 49113 | 
    
| ParticipantIDs | unpaywall_primary_10_1093_jas_skac211 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9387598 proquest_miscellaneous_2674347327 proquest_journals_2712365615 pubmed_primary_35671336 crossref_primary_10_1093_jas_skac211 crossref_citationtrail_10_1093_jas_skac211 oup_primary_10_1093_jas_skac211  | 
    
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX  | 
    
| PublicationCentury | 2000 | 
    
| PublicationDate | 2022-08-01 | 
    
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2022-08-01 | 
    
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2022 text: 2022-08-01 day: 01  | 
    
| PublicationDecade | 2020 | 
    
| PublicationPlace | US | 
    
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: US – name: United States – name: Champaign  | 
    
| PublicationTitle | Journal of animal science | 
    
| PublicationTitleAlternate | J Anim Sci | 
    
| PublicationYear | 2022 | 
    
| Publisher | Oxford University Press | 
    
| Publisher_xml | – name: Oxford University Press | 
    
| References | Pinto (2022081814441937000_CIT0027) 2020; 12 Roessler (2022081814441937000_CIT0033) 2021; 15 Knapp (2022081814441937000_CIT0017) 2014; 97 Mapfumo (2022081814441937000_CIT0023) 2018; 8 Wang (2022081814441937000_CIT0041) 2015; 1 Wang (2022081814441937000_CIT0042) 2019; 102 Sorg (2022081814441937000_CIT0037) 2018; 153 Hammond (2022081814441937000_CIT0011) 2015; 203 Beauchemin (2022081814441937000_CIT0002) 2008; 48 Rey (2022081814441937000_CIT0030) 2019; 9 Jonker (2022081814441937000_CIT0016) 2014; 54 Lee (2022081814441937000_CIT0020) 2012; 11 Macdonald (2022081814441937000_CIT0022) 2018 Kobayashi (2022081814441937000_CIT0018) 2021; 34 Velazco (2022081814441937000_CIT0039) 2014; 54 Niero (2022081814441937000_CIT0026) 2020; 10 Ricci (2022081814441937000_CIT0031) 2014; 92 Johnson (2022081814441937000_CIT0015) 1995; 73 Roessler (2022081814441937000_CIT0032) 2018; 150 Cameron (2022081814441937000_CIT0003) 2018; 73 Scholkmann (2022081814441937000_CIT0034) 2012; 5 R Core Team. (2022081814441937000_CIT0028) 2020 IPCC. (2022081814441937000_CIT0012) 2014 Murray (2022081814441937000_CIT0024) 1976; 36 Janssen (2022081814441937000_CIT0013) 2010; 160 Kuznetsova (2022081814441937000_CIT0019) 2017; 82 Denninger (2022081814441937000_CIT0007) 2020; 103 Baldwin (2022081814441937000_CIT0001) 1987; 54 Sorg (2022081814441937000_CIT0038) 2017; 143 Grobler (2022081814441937000_CIT0010) 2014; 44 NASEM. (2022081814441937000_CIT0025) 2016 Garnsworthy (2022081814441937000_CIT0009) 2019; 9 Chagunda (2022081814441937000_CIT0004) 2009; 68 Jeon (2022081814441937000_CIT0014) 2016; 58 Fox (2022081814441937000_CIT0008) 2004; 112 Waghorn (2022081814441937000_CIT0040) 1983; 26 Lenth (2022081814441937000_CIT0021) 2016; 69 Reintke (2022081814441937000_CIT0029) 2020; 63 Seo (2022081814441937000_CIT0035) 2018; 31 Crompton (2022081814441937000_CIT0006) 2011 Chagunda (2022081814441937000_CIT0005) 2011; 165 Sorg (2022081814441937000_CIT0036) 2022; 1  | 
    
| References_xml | – volume: 34 start-page: 1415 year: 2021 ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0018 article-title: Laser methane detector-based quantification of methane emissions from indoor-fed Fogera dairy cows publication-title: Anim. Biosci doi: 10.5713/ab.20.0739 – volume: 73 start-page: 789 year: 2018 ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0003 article-title: A comparison of milk yields and methane production from three contrasting high-yielding dairy cattle feeding regimes: cut-and-carry, partial grazing and total mixed ration publication-title: Grass Forage Sci doi: 10.1111/gfs.12353 – volume: 203 start-page: 41 year: 2015 ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0011 article-title: Methane emissions from cattle: estimates from short-term measurements using a GreenFeed system compared with measurements obtained using respiration chambers or sulphur hexafluoride tracer publication-title: Anim. Feed Sci. Tech doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.02.008 – volume: 63 start-page: 113 year: 2020 ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0029 article-title: Assessment of methane emission traits in ewes using a laser methane detector: genetic parameters and impact on lamb weaning performance publication-title: Arch. Anim. Breed doi: 10.5194/aab-63-113-2020 – volume: 160 start-page: 1 year: 2010 ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0013 article-title: Influence of hydrogen on rumen methane formation and fermentation balances through microbial growth kinetics and fermentation thermodynamics publication-title: Anim. Feed Sci. Tech doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.07.002 – volume: 54 start-page: 107 year: 1987 ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0001 article-title: Metabolism of the lactating cow: II. Digestive elements of a mechanistic model publication-title: J. Dairy Res doi: 10.1017/S0022029900025231 – volume: 143 start-page: 262 year: 2017 ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0038 article-title: The agreement between two next-generation laser methane detectors and respiration chamber facilities in recording methane concentrations in the spent air produced by dairy cows publication-title: Comput. Electron. Agr doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2017.10.024 – volume-title: Nutrient requirements of beef cattle year: 2016 ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0025 – volume: 15 start-page: 100070 year: 2021 ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0033 article-title: Application of the laser methane detector for measurements in freely grazing goats: impact on animals’ behaviour and methane emissions publication-title: Animal doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2020.100070 – volume: 5 start-page: 588 year: 2012 ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0034 article-title: An efficient algorithm for automatic peak detection in noisy periodic and quasi-periodic signals publication-title: Algorithms doi: 10.3390/a5040588 – volume: 92 start-page: 5239 year: 2014 ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0031 article-title: Evaluation of the laser methane detector to estimate methane emissions from ewes and steers publication-title: J. Anim. Sci doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-7676 – volume: 150 start-page: 110 year: 2018 ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0032 article-title: Using a portable laser methane detector in goats to assess diurnal, diet- and position-dependent variations in enteric methane emissions publication-title: Comput. Electron. Agric doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.04.010 – volume-title: Mixdist: finite mixture distribution models year: 2018 ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0022 – volume: 8 start-page: 1 year: 2018 ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0023 article-title: Enteric methane output from selected herds of beef cattle raised under extensive arid rangelands publication-title: Pastoralism doi: 10.1186/s13570-018-0121-9 – volume: 31 start-page: 1381 year: 2018 ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0035 article-title: Editorial: Guidelines for experimental design and statistical analyses in animal studies submitted for publication in the Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. publication-title: Asian-Austral. J. Anim doi: 10.5713/ajas.18.0468 – volume: 36 start-page: 1 year: 1976 ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0024 article-title: Rates of production of methane in the rumen and large intestine of sheep. publication-title: Brit. J. Nutr doi: 10.1079/BJN19760053 – volume: 48 start-page: 21 year: 2008 ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0002 article-title: Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: a review publication-title: Aust. J. Exp. Agr doi: 10.1071/EA07199 – volume: 44 start-page: 12 year: 2014 ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0010 article-title: Methane production in different breeds, grazing different pastures or fed a total mixed ration, as measured by a Laser Methane Detector publication-title: S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci doi: 10.4314/sajas.v44i5.3 – volume: 11 start-page: 3228 year: 2012 ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0020 article-title: Prediction of ruminal methane production from cattle publication-title: J. Anim. Vet. Adv doi: 10.3923/javaa.2012.3228.3233 – volume: 12 start-page: 628 year: 2020 ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0027 article-title: Enteric methane emissions of dairy cattle considering breed composition, pasture management, housing conditions and feeding characteristics along a rural-urban gradient in a rising megacity publication-title: Agriculture doi: 10.3390/agriculture10120628 – volume: 73 start-page: 2483 year: 1995 ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0015 article-title: Methane emissions from cattle publication-title: J. Anim. Sci doi: 10.2527/1995.7382483x – volume: 102 start-page: 6242 year: 2019 ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0042 article-title: Technical note: evaluation of interval between measurements and calculation method for the quantification of enteric methane emissions measured by respiration chamber publication-title: J. Dairy Sci doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-16245 – volume: 112 start-page: 29 year: 2004 ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0008 article-title: The Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System model for evaluating herd nutrition and nutrient excretion publication-title: Anim. Feed Sci. Tech doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2003.10.006 – volume: 82 start-page: 1 year: 2017 ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0019 article-title: lmerTest Package: tests in linear mixed effects models publication-title: J. Stat. Sofw – volume: 54 start-page: 1737 year: 2014 ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0039 article-title: Methane emissions and feeding behaviour of feedlot cattle supplemented with nitrate or urea publication-title: Anim. Prod. Sci doi: 10.1071/AN14345 – volume: 68 start-page: 157 year: 2009 ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0004 article-title: On the use of a laser methane detector in dairy cows publication-title: Comput. Electron. Agr doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2009.05.008 – start-page: 151 volume-title: Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change year: 2014 ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0012 – volume: 1 start-page: 329 year: 2015 ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0041 article-title: A mathematical model to describe the diurnal pattern of enteric methane emissions from non-lactating dairy cows post-feeding publication-title: Anim. Nutr doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2015.11.009 – volume-title: R: A language and environment for statistical computing year: 2020 ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0028 – volume: 9 start-page: 837 year: 2019 ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0009 article-title: Comparison of methods to measure methane for use in genetic evaluation of dairy cattle publication-title: Animals doi: 10.3390/ani9100837 – volume: 69 start-page: 1 year: 2016 ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0021 article-title: Least-squares means: the R package lsmeans publication-title: J. Stat. Sofw – volume: 26 start-page: 289 year: 1983 ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0040 article-title: Rumen motility in sheep and cattle given different diets publication-title: New Zealand J. Agric. Res doi: 10.1080/00288233.1983.10427032 – volume: 103 start-page: 2024 year: 2020 ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0007 article-title: Accuracy of methane emissions predicted from milk mid-infrared spectra and measured by laser methane detectors in Brown Swiss dairy cows publication-title: J. Dairy Sci doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-17101 – volume: 165 start-page: 8 year: 2011 ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0005 article-title: Do methane measurements from a laser detector and an indirect open-circuit respiration calorimetric chamber agree sufficiently closely? publication-title: Anim. Feed Sci. Tech doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.02.005 – volume: 10 start-page: 606 year: 2020 ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0026 article-title: Repeatability and reproducibility of measures of bovine methane emissions recorded using a laser detector publication-title: Animals doi: 10.3390/ani10040606 – volume: 58 start-page: 1 year: 2016 ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0014 article-title: Evaluation of feed value of a by-product of pickled radish for ruminants: analyses of nutrient composition, storage stability, and in vitro ruminal fermentation publication-title: J. Anim. Sci. Technol doi: 10.1186/s40781-016-0117-1 – start-page: 176 volume-title: Modelling nutrient digestion and utilisation in farm animals year: 2011 ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0006 article-title: Fluctuations in methane emission in response to feeding pattern in lactating dairy cows. doi: 10.3920/978-90-8686-712-7_19 – volume: 9 start-page: 563 year: 2019 ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0030 article-title: Comparison between non-invasive methane measurement techniques in cattle publication-title: Animals doi: 10.3390/ani9080563 – volume: 153 start-page: 285 year: 2018 ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0037 article-title: Comparison of a laser methane detector with the GreenFeed and two breath analysers for on-farm measurements of methane emissions from dairy cows publication-title: Comput. Electron. Agric doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.08.024 – volume: 54 start-page: 1350 year: 2014 ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0016 article-title: Feeding lucerne silage to beef cattle at three allowances and four feeding frequencies affects circadian patterns of methane emissions, but not emissions per unit of intake publication-title: Anim. Prod. Sci doi: 10.1071/AN14235 – volume: 97 start-page: 3231 year: 2014 ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0017 article-title: Invited review: enteric methane in dairy cattle production: quantifying the opportunities and impact of reducing emissions publication-title: J. Dairy Sci doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7234 – volume: 1 start-page: 38 year: 2022 ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0036 article-title: Measuring livestock CH4 emissions with the laser methane detector: a review publication-title: Methane doi: 10.3390/methane1010004  | 
    
| SSID | ssj0012595 | 
    
| Score | 2.4292722 | 
    
| Snippet | Abstract
The hand-held laser methane detector (LMD) technique has been suggested as an alternative method for measuring methane (CH4) emissions from enteric... The hand-held laser methane detector (LMD) technique has been suggested as an alternative method for measuring methane (CH4) emissions from enteric...  | 
    
| SourceID | unpaywall pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref oup  | 
    
| SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher  | 
    
| SubjectTerms | Agriculture Algorithms Animal Feed - analysis Animals Body Weight Cattle Correlation coefficient Correlation coefficients Data processing Diet Diet - veterinary Distribution functions Emission measurements Emissions Energy Eructation - metabolism Eructation - veterinary Evaluation Experiments Fermentation Hydrofluorocarbons Intensive farming Lasers Measurement methods Methane Methane - metabolism Respiration Rumen - metabolism Ruminant Nutrition  | 
    
| Title | Application of a hand-held laser methane detector for measuring enteric methane emissions from cattle in intensive farming | 
    
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35671336 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2712365615 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2674347327 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9387598 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/9387598  | 
    
| UnpaywallVersion | submittedVersion | 
    
| Volume | 100 | 
    
| hasFullText | 1 | 
    
| inHoldings | 1 | 
    
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAQN databaseName: PubMed Central customDbUrl: eissn: 1525-3163 dateEnd: 20241102 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0012595 issn: 1525-3163 databaseCode: RPM dateStart: 20170101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ providerName: National Library of Medicine – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Technology Collection customDbUrl: eissn: 1525-3163 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0012595 issn: 1525-3163 databaseCode: 8FG dateStart: 19971001 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1 providerName: ProQuest  | 
    
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Lb9NAEB616QE4lGfBUMIilQvSJn6tH8cIESokKoSIVE7W7nq3DXWdKHFU0V_PjF80gCq4Wd6RXzv2fp755huAoxwBGwJpy1Ua-zy0ruZSypxHRivi5ypdSwp9OomOZ-HHU3G6A15XC1OT9rWaj8riclTOz2tu5fJSjzue2DgNEGKnyS7sRQLh9wD2ZiefJ98aKofHk6TJcApfcHRe0W97dVc1Ep_hMX6S21o9_KEff5fr8fpCat_ztlanrYq3G8DzT_7knU25lD-uZFHcWJym9-FLd1sNJ-VitKnUSF__pvj4X_f9APZbqMomzdBD2DHlI7g3OVu1ch3mMVxPfuW_2cIyySgQz89NkTOE5WbFqEO1LA3LTVXnBxiCZNxJgUlcNBkpguLxejPqPkfxuzWjuhema4llNi_ZvKPaMyuJvnP2BGbT91_fHfO2mwPXYehW3CapiINUJrFOqC5RCIP_MgY9wyBMINWgVJFegFSxCUzuIpBwA41LSaBtJJQMDmBQLkrzDJiMXOu5VrlW6FCoSFrEsTr3AhkpmdjUgbfdLGa6lTqnjhtF1qTcgwynPGun3IGj3njZKHz83ewVusPtFoedq2Tth2Cd-THJ2yBIFQ687ofxWVJeBp_rYoM2VAgSxoEfO_C08az-PIGIKIwQORBv-VxvQPLg2yPoPbVMeOswDrzpvfO2y3_-j3Yv4K5PJSA1CfIQBtVqY14iMKvUEHaT6YdhHTEbtq_lT1sdPPE | 
    
| linkProvider | Unpaywall | 
    
| linkToUnpaywall | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Nb9NAEB2V9AAc-IYaCixSuSBtYnu9_jhGiKpCokKISOVk7a5321DXiRJHFf31zPiLBlAFtyg7imPvs_d5580bgIMCCRsSacd1loQ8cr7hSqmCx9Zo0udq01gKfTqOj2bRxxN5sgNBXwvTiPaNno-r8mJczc8abeXywkx6ndgkE0ixs_QW7MYS6fcIdmfHn6ffWilHwNO0zXDKUHIErxw-B01XNTKf4Qk-krtaPXyhn3xX68n6XJkwCLZWp62Kt2vE80_95O1NtVQ_LlVZXlucDu_Dl_60Wk3K-XhT67G5-s3x8b_O-wHc66gqm7ZDD2HHVo_g7vR01dl12MdwNf2V_2YLxxSjjXh-ZsuCIS23K0YdqlVlWWHrJj_AkCTjl7QxiYsmI0dQ_L0hjLrP0f7dmlHdCzONxTKbV2zeS-2ZUyTfOX0Cs8MPX98f8a6bAzdR5NfcpZlMRKbSxKRUlyilxXcZi8iwSBPINSjT5BegdGKFLXwkEr4wuJQI42KplXgKo2pR2T1gKvZd4DvtO2kiqWPlkMeaIhAq1ip1mQfv-lnMTWd1Th03yrxNuYscpzzvptyDgyF42Tp8_D3sNcLh5oj9Hip59yBY52FC9jZIUqUHb4ZhvJaUl8HruthgDBWCRIkIEw-etcgajiNkTNsIsQfJFuaGALIH3x5B9DQ24R1gPHg7oPOmv__8H-NewJ2QSkAaEeQ-jOrVxr5EYlbrV92t-BORejr7 | 
    
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Application+of+a+hand-held+laser+methane+detector+for+measuring+enteric+methane+emissions+from+cattle+in+intensive+farming&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+animal+science&rft.au=Kang%2C+Kyewon&rft.au=Cho%2C+Hyunjin&rft.au=Jeong%2C+Sinyong&rft.au=Jeon%2C+Seoyoung&rft.date=2022-08-01&rft.issn=1525-3163&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093%2Fjas%2Fskac211&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT | 
    
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0021-8812&client=summon | 
    
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0021-8812&client=summon | 
    
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0021-8812&client=summon |