Application of a hand-held laser methane detector for measuring enteric methane emissions from cattle in intensive farming

Abstract The hand-held laser methane detector (LMD) technique has been suggested as an alternative method for measuring methane (CH4) emissions from enteric fermentation of ruminants in the field. This study aimed to establish a standard procedure for using LMD to assess CH4 production in cattle and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of animal science Vol. 100; no. 8
Main Authors Kang, Kyewon, Cho, Hyunjin, Jeong, Sinyong, Jeon, Seoyoung, Lee, Mingyung, Lee, Seul, Baek, Yulchang, Oh, Joonpyo, Seo, Seongwon
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published US Oxford University Press 01.08.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0021-8812
1525-3163
1525-3015
1544-7847
1525-3163
DOI10.1093/jas/skac211

Cover

Abstract Abstract The hand-held laser methane detector (LMD) technique has been suggested as an alternative method for measuring methane (CH4) emissions from enteric fermentation of ruminants in the field. This study aimed to establish a standard procedure for using LMD to assess CH4 production in cattle and evaluate the efficacy of the protocol to detect differences in CH4 emissions from cattle fed with diets of different forage-to-concentrate (FC) ratios. Experiment 1 was conducted with four Hanwoo steers (584 ± 57.4 kg body weight [BW]) individually housed in metabolic cages. The LMD was installed on a tripod aimed at the animal’s nostril, and the CH4 concentration in the exhaled gas was measured for 6 min every hour for 2 consecutive days. For the data processing, the CH4 concentration peaks were identified by the automatic multi-scale peak detection algorithm. The peaks were then separated into those from respiration and eructation by fitting combinations of two of the four distribution functions (normal, log-normal, gamma, and Weibull) using the mixdist R package. In addition, the most appropriate time and number of consecutive measurements to represent the daily average CH4 concentration were determined. In experiment 2, 30 Hanwoo growing steers (343 ± 24.6 kg BW), blocked by BW, were randomly divided into three groups. Three different diets were provided to each group: high FC ratio (35:65) with low-energy concentrate (HFC-LEC), high FC ratio with high-energy concentrate (HFC-HEC), and low FC ratio (25:75) with high-energy concentrate (LFC-HEC). After 10 d of feeding the diets, the CH4 concentrations for all steers were measured and analyzed in duplicate according to the protocol established in experiment 1. In experiment 1, the mean correlation coefficient between the CH4 concentration from respiration and eructation was highest when a combination of two normal distributions was assumed (r = 0.79). The most appropriate measurement times were as follows: 2 h and 1 h before, and 1 h and 2 h after morning feeding. Compared with LFC-HEC, HFC-LEC showed 49% and 57% higher CH4 concentrations in exhaled gas from respiration and eructation (P < 0.01). In conclusion, the LMD method can be applied to evaluate differences in CH4 emissions in cattle using the protocol established in this study. Lay Summary The hand-held laser methane detector (LMD) technique has been suggested as a potential method for measuring methane (CH4) emissions from enteric fermentation of ruminants in the field. This study aimed to establish a standard procedure for using LMD to assess CH4 production in cattle and evaluate the efficacy of the protocol to detect differences in CH4 emissions from cattle fed with diets of different forage-to-concentrate (FC) ratios which is known to affect CH4 emissions. Experiment 1 was conducted to establish a protocol for measuring and analyzing the CH4 emissions from cattle using LMD. In experiment 2, 30 Hanwoo growing steers were divided into three groups and fed with a diet of high FC ratio (35:65) with low-energy concentrate (HFC-LEC), high FC ratio (35:65) with high-energy concentrate (HFC-HEC), or low FC ratio (25:75) with high-energy concentrate (LFC-HEC). The CH4 concentrations for all steers were measured in duplicate according to the protocol established in experiment 1. HFC-LEC showed 49% and 57% higher CH4 concentrations in exhaled gas from respiration and eructation, respectively (P < 0.01), than LFC-HEC. In conclusion, the LMD method can be applied to evaluate differences in CH4 emissions in cattle using the protocol established in this study. The hand-held laser methane detector (LMD) technique has been suggested as a potential method for measuring methane (CH4) emissions from enteric fermentation of ruminants in the field. The LMD method can be applied to evaluate differences in CH4 emissions in cattle efficiently using the protocol established in this study.
AbstractList The hand-held laser methane detector (LMD) technique has been suggested as an alternative method for measuring methane (CH4) emissions from enteric fermentation of ruminants in the field. This study aimed to establish a standard procedure for using LMD to assess CH4 production in cattle and evaluate the efficacy of the protocol to detect differences in CH4 emissions from cattle fed with diets of different forage-to-concentrate (FC) ratios. Experiment 1 was conducted with four Hanwoo steers (584 ± 57.4 kg body weight [BW]) individually housed in metabolic cages. The LMD was installed on a tripod aimed at the animal's nostril, and the CH4 concentration in the exhaled gas was measured for 6 min every hour for 2 consecutive days. For the data processing, the CH4 concentration peaks were identified by the automatic multi-scale peak detection algorithm. The peaks were then separated into those from respiration and eructation by fitting combinations of two of the four distribution functions (normal, log-normal, gamma, and Weibull) using the mixdist R package. In addition, the most appropriate time and number of consecutive measurements to represent the daily average CH4 concentration were determined. In experiment 2, 30 Hanwoo growing steers (343 ± 24.6 kg BW), blocked by BW, were randomly divided into three groups. Three different diets were provided to each group: high FC ratio (35:65) with low-energy concentrate (HFC-LEC), high FC ratio with high-energy concentrate (HFC-HEC), and low FC ratio (25:75) with high-energy concentrate (LFC-HEC). After 10 d of feeding the diets, the CH4 concentrations for all steers were measured and analyzed in duplicate according to the protocol established in experiment 1. In experiment 1, the mean correlation coefficient between the CH4 concentration from respiration and eructation was highest when a combination of two normal distributions was assumed (r = 0.79). The most appropriate measurement times were as follows: 2 h and 1 h before, and 1 h and 2 h after morning feeding. Compared with LFC-HEC, HFC-LEC showed 49% and 57% higher CH4 concentrations in exhaled gas from respiration and eructation (P < 0.01). In conclusion, the LMD method can be applied to evaluate differences in CH4 emissions in cattle using the protocol established in this study.
Abstract The hand-held laser methane detector (LMD) technique has been suggested as an alternative method for measuring methane (CH4) emissions from enteric fermentation of ruminants in the field. This study aimed to establish a standard procedure for using LMD to assess CH4 production in cattle and evaluate the efficacy of the protocol to detect differences in CH4 emissions from cattle fed with diets of different forage-to-concentrate (FC) ratios. Experiment 1 was conducted with four Hanwoo steers (584 ± 57.4 kg body weight [BW]) individually housed in metabolic cages. The LMD was installed on a tripod aimed at the animal’s nostril, and the CH4 concentration in the exhaled gas was measured for 6 min every hour for 2 consecutive days. For the data processing, the CH4 concentration peaks were identified by the automatic multi-scale peak detection algorithm. The peaks were then separated into those from respiration and eructation by fitting combinations of two of the four distribution functions (normal, log-normal, gamma, and Weibull) using the mixdist R package. In addition, the most appropriate time and number of consecutive measurements to represent the daily average CH4 concentration were determined. In experiment 2, 30 Hanwoo growing steers (343 ± 24.6 kg BW), blocked by BW, were randomly divided into three groups. Three different diets were provided to each group: high FC ratio (35:65) with low-energy concentrate (HFC-LEC), high FC ratio with high-energy concentrate (HFC-HEC), and low FC ratio (25:75) with high-energy concentrate (LFC-HEC). After 10 d of feeding the diets, the CH4 concentrations for all steers were measured and analyzed in duplicate according to the protocol established in experiment 1. In experiment 1, the mean correlation coefficient between the CH4 concentration from respiration and eructation was highest when a combination of two normal distributions was assumed (r = 0.79). The most appropriate measurement times were as follows: 2 h and 1 h before, and 1 h and 2 h after morning feeding. Compared with LFC-HEC, HFC-LEC showed 49% and 57% higher CH4 concentrations in exhaled gas from respiration and eructation (P < 0.01). In conclusion, the LMD method can be applied to evaluate differences in CH4 emissions in cattle using the protocol established in this study. Lay Summary The hand-held laser methane detector (LMD) technique has been suggested as a potential method for measuring methane (CH4) emissions from enteric fermentation of ruminants in the field. This study aimed to establish a standard procedure for using LMD to assess CH4 production in cattle and evaluate the efficacy of the protocol to detect differences in CH4 emissions from cattle fed with diets of different forage-to-concentrate (FC) ratios which is known to affect CH4 emissions. Experiment 1 was conducted to establish a protocol for measuring and analyzing the CH4 emissions from cattle using LMD. In experiment 2, 30 Hanwoo growing steers were divided into three groups and fed with a diet of high FC ratio (35:65) with low-energy concentrate (HFC-LEC), high FC ratio (35:65) with high-energy concentrate (HFC-HEC), or low FC ratio (25:75) with high-energy concentrate (LFC-HEC). The CH4 concentrations for all steers were measured in duplicate according to the protocol established in experiment 1. HFC-LEC showed 49% and 57% higher CH4 concentrations in exhaled gas from respiration and eructation, respectively (P < 0.01), than LFC-HEC. In conclusion, the LMD method can be applied to evaluate differences in CH4 emissions in cattle using the protocol established in this study. The hand-held laser methane detector (LMD) technique has been suggested as a potential method for measuring methane (CH4) emissions from enteric fermentation of ruminants in the field. The LMD method can be applied to evaluate differences in CH4 emissions in cattle efficiently using the protocol established in this study.
The hand-held laser methane detector (LMD) technique has been suggested as an alternative method for measuring methane (CH4) emissions from enteric fermentation of ruminants in the field. This study aimed to establish a standard procedure for using LMD to assess CH4 production in cattle and evaluate the efficacy of the protocol to detect differences in CH4 emissions from cattle fed with diets of different forage-to-concentrate (FC) ratios. Experiment 1 was conducted with four Hanwoo steers (584 ± 57.4 kg body weight [BW]) individually housed in metabolic cages. The LMD was installed on a tripod aimed at the animal's nostril, and the CH4 concentration in the exhaled gas was measured for 6 min every hour for 2 consecutive days. For the data processing, the CH4 concentration peaks were identified by the automatic multi-scale peak detection algorithm. The peaks were then separated into those from respiration and eructation by fitting combinations of two of the four distribution functions (normal, log-normal, gamma, and Weibull) using the mixdist R package. In addition, the most appropriate time and number of consecutive measurements to represent the daily average CH4 concentration were determined. In experiment 2, 30 Hanwoo growing steers (343 ± 24.6 kg BW), blocked by BW, were randomly divided into three groups. Three different diets were provided to each group: high FC ratio (35:65) with low-energy concentrate (HFC-LEC), high FC ratio with high-energy concentrate (HFC-HEC), and low FC ratio (25:75) with high-energy concentrate (LFC-HEC). After 10 d of feeding the diets, the CH4 concentrations for all steers were measured and analyzed in duplicate according to the protocol established in experiment 1. In experiment 1, the mean correlation coefficient between the CH4 concentration from respiration and eructation was highest when a combination of two normal distributions was assumed (r = 0.79). The most appropriate measurement times were as follows: 2 h and 1 h before, and 1 h and 2 h after morning feeding. Compared with LFC-HEC, HFC-LEC showed 49% and 57% higher CH4 concentrations in exhaled gas from respiration and eructation (P < 0.01). In conclusion, the LMD method can be applied to evaluate differences in CH4 emissions in cattle using the protocol established in this study.The hand-held laser methane detector (LMD) technique has been suggested as an alternative method for measuring methane (CH4) emissions from enteric fermentation of ruminants in the field. This study aimed to establish a standard procedure for using LMD to assess CH4 production in cattle and evaluate the efficacy of the protocol to detect differences in CH4 emissions from cattle fed with diets of different forage-to-concentrate (FC) ratios. Experiment 1 was conducted with four Hanwoo steers (584 ± 57.4 kg body weight [BW]) individually housed in metabolic cages. The LMD was installed on a tripod aimed at the animal's nostril, and the CH4 concentration in the exhaled gas was measured for 6 min every hour for 2 consecutive days. For the data processing, the CH4 concentration peaks were identified by the automatic multi-scale peak detection algorithm. The peaks were then separated into those from respiration and eructation by fitting combinations of two of the four distribution functions (normal, log-normal, gamma, and Weibull) using the mixdist R package. In addition, the most appropriate time and number of consecutive measurements to represent the daily average CH4 concentration were determined. In experiment 2, 30 Hanwoo growing steers (343 ± 24.6 kg BW), blocked by BW, were randomly divided into three groups. Three different diets were provided to each group: high FC ratio (35:65) with low-energy concentrate (HFC-LEC), high FC ratio with high-energy concentrate (HFC-HEC), and low FC ratio (25:75) with high-energy concentrate (LFC-HEC). After 10 d of feeding the diets, the CH4 concentrations for all steers were measured and analyzed in duplicate according to the protocol established in experiment 1. In experiment 1, the mean correlation coefficient between the CH4 concentration from respiration and eructation was highest when a combination of two normal distributions was assumed (r = 0.79). The most appropriate measurement times were as follows: 2 h and 1 h before, and 1 h and 2 h after morning feeding. Compared with LFC-HEC, HFC-LEC showed 49% and 57% higher CH4 concentrations in exhaled gas from respiration and eructation (P < 0.01). In conclusion, the LMD method can be applied to evaluate differences in CH4 emissions in cattle using the protocol established in this study.
The hand-held laser methane detector (LMD) technique has been suggested as an alternative method for measuring methane (CH4) emissions from enteric fermentation of ruminants in the field. This study aimed to establish a standard procedure for using LMD to assess CH4 production in cattle and evaluate the efficacy of the protocol to detect differences in CH4 emissions from cattle fed with diets of different forage-to-concentrate (FC) ratios. Experiment 1 was conducted with four Hanwoo steers (584 ± 57.4 kg body weight [BW]) individually housed in metabolic cages. The LMD was installed on a tripod aimed at the animal’s nostril, and the CH4 concentration in the exhaled gas was measured for 6 min every hour for 2 consecutive days. For the data processing, the CH4 concentration peaks were identified by the automatic multi-scale peak detection algorithm. The peaks were then separated into those from respiration and eructation by fitting combinations of two of the four distribution functions (normal, log-normal, gamma, and Weibull) using the mixdist R package. In addition, the most appropriate time and number of consecutive measurements to represent the daily average CH4 concentration were determined. In experiment 2, 30 Hanwoo growing steers (343 ± 24.6 kg BW), blocked by BW, were randomly divided into three groups. Three different diets were provided to each group: high FC ratio (35:65) with low-energy concentrate (HFC-LEC), high FC ratio with high-energy concentrate (HFC-HEC), and low FC ratio (25:75) with high-energy concentrate (LFC-HEC). After 10 d of feeding the diets, the CH4 concentrations for all steers were measured and analyzed in duplicate according to the protocol established in experiment 1. In experiment 1, the mean correlation coefficient between the CH4 concentration from respiration and eructation was highest when a combination of two normal distributions was assumed (r = 0.79). The most appropriate measurement times were as follows: 2 h and 1 h before, and 1 h and 2 h after morning feeding. Compared with LFC-HEC, HFC-LEC showed 49% and 57% higher CH4 concentrations in exhaled gas from respiration and eructation (P < 0.01). In conclusion, the LMD method can be applied to evaluate differences in CH4 emissions in cattle using the protocol established in this study. The hand-held laser methane detector (LMD) technique has been suggested as a potential method for measuring methane (CH4) emissions from enteric fermentation of ruminants in the field. The LMD method can be applied to evaluate differences in CH4 emissions in cattle efficiently using the protocol established in this study.
Author Cho, Hyunjin
Baek, Yulchang
Jeong, Sinyong
Lee, Seul
Seo, Seongwon
Kang, Kyewon
Lee, Mingyung
Jeon, Seoyoung
Oh, Joonpyo
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Kyewon
  surname: Kang
  fullname: Kang, Kyewon
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Hyunjin
  orcidid: 0000-0001-8676-1481
  surname: Cho
  fullname: Cho, Hyunjin
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Sinyong
  surname: Jeong
  fullname: Jeong, Sinyong
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Seoyoung
  surname: Jeon
  fullname: Jeon, Seoyoung
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Mingyung
  surname: Lee
  fullname: Lee, Mingyung
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Seul
  surname: Lee
  fullname: Lee, Seul
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Yulchang
  surname: Baek
  fullname: Baek, Yulchang
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Joonpyo
  surname: Oh
  fullname: Oh, Joonpyo
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Seongwon
  orcidid: 0000-0002-4131-0545
  surname: Seo
  fullname: Seo, Seongwon
  email: swseo@cnu.kr
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35671336$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkt1rFTEQxYNU7G31yXcJCCLo2nxsNrsvhVL8goIv-hxmc2d7c91N1iRbqX-9qfdataBCIDDzO4eZkxyRAx88EvKYs1ecdfJkC-kkfQYrOL9HVlwJVUneyAOyYkzwqm25OCRHKW0Z40J16gE5lKrRXMpmRb6dzfPoLGQXPA0DBboBv642OK7pCAkjnTCXEtI1ZrQ5RDqEmyKkJTp_SdFnjM7eYji5lIpZokMMEy3OeUTqfDkZfXJXSAeIU5E-JPcHGBM-2t_H5NOb1x_P31UXH96-Pz-7qGxds1wNbae07KDVtm24bpXCTtcIAChqwbrS61nNFfQaJa4ZbxWTFnsu7dCoHuQxebnzXfwM119hHM0c3QTx2nBmbiI0JUKzj7Dgpzt8XvoJ17YsGOGXJIAzf3a825jLcGU62WrVtcXg-d4ghi8LpmxKJBbHscQTlmREo2tZayl0QZ_eQbdhib6kYYTmQjaq4apQT36f6HaUn69YgBc7wMaQUsThPwvyO7R1-ccHKOu48S-aZztNWOZ_mn8HKkrP6w
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3389_fvets_2023_1168237
crossref_primary_10_3390_en16093867
crossref_primary_10_7744_kjoas_510304
crossref_primary_10_3390_ani14223195
crossref_primary_10_5187_ait_2024_11_2_93
crossref_primary_10_3390_ani14010139
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_atech_2025_100789
crossref_primary_10_1186_s42523_024_00325_4
crossref_primary_10_3390_ani14030469
Cites_doi 10.5713/ab.20.0739
10.1111/gfs.12353
10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.02.008
10.5194/aab-63-113-2020
10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.07.002
10.1017/S0022029900025231
10.1016/j.compag.2017.10.024
10.1016/j.animal.2020.100070
10.3390/a5040588
10.2527/jas.2014-7676
10.1016/j.compag.2018.04.010
10.1186/s13570-018-0121-9
10.5713/ajas.18.0468
10.1079/BJN19760053
10.1071/EA07199
10.4314/sajas.v44i5.3
10.3923/javaa.2012.3228.3233
10.3390/agriculture10120628
10.2527/1995.7382483x
10.3168/jds.2019-16245
10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2003.10.006
10.1071/AN14345
10.1016/j.compag.2009.05.008
10.1016/j.aninu.2015.11.009
10.3390/ani9100837
10.1080/00288233.1983.10427032
10.3168/jds.2019-17101
10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.02.005
10.3390/ani10040606
10.1186/s40781-016-0117-1
10.3920/978-90-8686-712-7_19
10.3390/ani9080563
10.1016/j.compag.2018.08.024
10.1071/AN14235
10.3168/jds.2013-7234
10.3390/methane1010004
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2022
The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2022
– notice: The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
K9.
U9A
7X8
5PM
ADTOC
UNPAY
DOI 10.1093/jas/skac211
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
Unpaywall for CDI: Periodical Content
Unpaywall
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Career and Technical Education (Alumni Edition)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
CrossRef

ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: UNPAY
  name: Unpaywall
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://unpaywall.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Access Repository
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Agriculture
EISSN 1525-3163
ExternalDocumentID oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:9387598
PMC9387598
35671336
10_1093_jas_skac211
10.1093/jas/skac211
Genre Randomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development
  grantid: PJ01477801
– fundername: ;
  grantid: PJ01477801
GroupedDBID ---
..I
.55
.GJ
0R~
186
18M
29J
2WC
48X
53G
5GY
5RE
5WD
7RQ
7X2
7X7
7XC
88E
88I
8AF
8FE
8FG
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8FW
8G5
8R4
8R5
AAHBH
AAIMJ
AAPQZ
AAPXW
AARHZ
AAUAY
AAUQX
AAVAP
AAWDT
ABCQX
ABDFA
ABEJV
ABGNP
ABIME
ABJCF
ABJNI
ABMNT
ABPIB
ABPQP
ABPTD
ABUWG
ABVGC
ABWST
ABXVV
ABXZS
ABZEO
ACFRR
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACGOD
ACIWK
ACPRK
ACQAM
ACUTJ
ACVCV
ACZBC
ADBBV
ADFRT
ADGKP
ADGZP
ADIPN
ADNBA
ADNWM
ADQBN
ADRTK
ADVEK
AELWJ
AENEX
AETBJ
AEUYN
AFFZL
AFGWE
AFKRA
AFRAH
AFYAG
AGINJ
AGKRT
AGMDO
AGQXC
AHMBA
AI.
AJDVS
AJEEA
AJNCP
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALXQX
ANFBD
AOIJS
APJGH
AQDSO
ASAOO
ATCPS
ATDFG
ATGXG
AZQEC
BAYMD
BBNVY
BCRHZ
BENPR
BES
BEYMZ
BGLVJ
BHPHI
BKOMP
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C1A
CCPQU
CS3
DU5
DWQXO
E3Z
EBS
ECGQY
EJD
ELUNK
EYRJQ
F5P
F9R
FHSFR
FJW
FLUFQ
FOEOM
FQBLK
FYUFA
GAUVT
GNUQQ
GUQSH
H13
HCIFZ
HMCUK
HYE
INIJC
JXSIZ
KBUDW
KOP
KSI
KSN
L6V
L7B
LK8
M0K
M1P
M2O
M2P
M2Q
M7P
M7S
MBTAY
ML0
MV1
MW2
NEJ
NHB
NLBLG
NOMLY
NVLIB
O9-
OBOKY
ODMLO
OJZSN
OK1
OWPYF
P-O
P0-
P2P
PATMY
PHGZT
PQQKQ
PRG
PROAC
PSQYO
PTHSS
PYCSY
Q2X
ROX
RPM
RUSNO
RWL
RXW
S0X
SJN
TAE
TCN
TR2
TWZ
UKHRP
VH1
W8F
WH7
WOQ
X7M
XOL
YKV
YR5
YXANX
ZCG
ZGI
ZXP
~KM
AAYXX
AHGBF
AJBYB
CITATION
3V.
88A
CGR
CUY
CVF
DIK
ECM
EIF
M0L
NPM
TJA
ABUFD
K9.
U9A
7X8
5PM
ADTOC
PHGZM
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQGLB
UNPAY
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-f895739a87c8617855e974eaaae24209739b0415ab7e3ed018503ceb13cf65ba3
IEDL.DBID UNPAY
ISSN 0021-8812
1525-3163
1525-3015
1544-7847
IngestDate Sun Oct 26 04:01:29 EDT 2025
Tue Sep 30 17:13:23 EDT 2025
Sun Sep 28 01:09:59 EDT 2025
Tue Oct 07 06:07:28 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:23:17 EST 2025
Wed Oct 01 01:15:54 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:54:59 EDT 2025
Wed Apr 02 07:00:08 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 8
Keywords eructation
cattle
respiration
forage-to-concentrate ratio
laser methane detector
methane emission
Language English
License This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights)
https://academic.oup.com/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights
The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c440t-f895739a87c8617855e974eaaae24209739b0415ab7e3ed018503ceb13cf65ba3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ORCID 0000-0001-8676-1481
0000-0002-4131-0545
OpenAccessLink https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/9387598
PMID 35671336
PQID 2712365615
PQPubID 49113
ParticipantIDs unpaywall_primary_10_1093_jas_skac211
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9387598
proquest_miscellaneous_2674347327
proquest_journals_2712365615
pubmed_primary_35671336
crossref_primary_10_1093_jas_skac211
crossref_citationtrail_10_1093_jas_skac211
oup_primary_10_1093_jas_skac211
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2022-08-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2022-08-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2022
  text: 2022-08-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace US
PublicationPlace_xml – name: US
– name: United States
– name: Champaign
PublicationTitle Journal of animal science
PublicationTitleAlternate J Anim Sci
PublicationYear 2022
Publisher Oxford University Press
Publisher_xml – name: Oxford University Press
References Pinto (2022081814441937000_CIT0027) 2020; 12
Roessler (2022081814441937000_CIT0033) 2021; 15
Knapp (2022081814441937000_CIT0017) 2014; 97
Mapfumo (2022081814441937000_CIT0023) 2018; 8
Wang (2022081814441937000_CIT0041) 2015; 1
Wang (2022081814441937000_CIT0042) 2019; 102
Sorg (2022081814441937000_CIT0037) 2018; 153
Hammond (2022081814441937000_CIT0011) 2015; 203
Beauchemin (2022081814441937000_CIT0002) 2008; 48
Rey (2022081814441937000_CIT0030) 2019; 9
Jonker (2022081814441937000_CIT0016) 2014; 54
Lee (2022081814441937000_CIT0020) 2012; 11
Macdonald (2022081814441937000_CIT0022) 2018
Kobayashi (2022081814441937000_CIT0018) 2021; 34
Velazco (2022081814441937000_CIT0039) 2014; 54
Niero (2022081814441937000_CIT0026) 2020; 10
Ricci (2022081814441937000_CIT0031) 2014; 92
Johnson (2022081814441937000_CIT0015) 1995; 73
Roessler (2022081814441937000_CIT0032) 2018; 150
Cameron (2022081814441937000_CIT0003) 2018; 73
Scholkmann (2022081814441937000_CIT0034) 2012; 5
R Core Team. (2022081814441937000_CIT0028) 2020
IPCC. (2022081814441937000_CIT0012) 2014
Murray (2022081814441937000_CIT0024) 1976; 36
Janssen (2022081814441937000_CIT0013) 2010; 160
Kuznetsova (2022081814441937000_CIT0019) 2017; 82
Denninger (2022081814441937000_CIT0007) 2020; 103
Baldwin (2022081814441937000_CIT0001) 1987; 54
Sorg (2022081814441937000_CIT0038) 2017; 143
Grobler (2022081814441937000_CIT0010) 2014; 44
NASEM. (2022081814441937000_CIT0025) 2016
Garnsworthy (2022081814441937000_CIT0009) 2019; 9
Chagunda (2022081814441937000_CIT0004) 2009; 68
Jeon (2022081814441937000_CIT0014) 2016; 58
Fox (2022081814441937000_CIT0008) 2004; 112
Waghorn (2022081814441937000_CIT0040) 1983; 26
Lenth (2022081814441937000_CIT0021) 2016; 69
Reintke (2022081814441937000_CIT0029) 2020; 63
Seo (2022081814441937000_CIT0035) 2018; 31
Crompton (2022081814441937000_CIT0006) 2011
Chagunda (2022081814441937000_CIT0005) 2011; 165
Sorg (2022081814441937000_CIT0036) 2022; 1
References_xml – volume: 34
  start-page: 1415
  year: 2021
  ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0018
  article-title: Laser methane detector-based quantification of methane emissions from indoor-fed Fogera dairy cows
  publication-title: Anim. Biosci
  doi: 10.5713/ab.20.0739
– volume: 73
  start-page: 789
  year: 2018
  ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0003
  article-title: A comparison of milk yields and methane production from three contrasting high-yielding dairy cattle feeding regimes: cut-and-carry, partial grazing and total mixed ration
  publication-title: Grass Forage Sci
  doi: 10.1111/gfs.12353
– volume: 203
  start-page: 41
  year: 2015
  ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0011
  article-title: Methane emissions from cattle: estimates from short-term measurements using a GreenFeed system compared with measurements obtained using respiration chambers or sulphur hexafluoride tracer
  publication-title: Anim. Feed Sci. Tech
  doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.02.008
– volume: 63
  start-page: 113
  year: 2020
  ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0029
  article-title: Assessment of methane emission traits in ewes using a laser methane detector: genetic parameters and impact on lamb weaning performance
  publication-title: Arch. Anim. Breed
  doi: 10.5194/aab-63-113-2020
– volume: 160
  start-page: 1
  year: 2010
  ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0013
  article-title: Influence of hydrogen on rumen methane formation and fermentation balances through microbial growth kinetics and fermentation thermodynamics
  publication-title: Anim. Feed Sci. Tech
  doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.07.002
– volume: 54
  start-page: 107
  year: 1987
  ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0001
  article-title: Metabolism of the lactating cow: II. Digestive elements of a mechanistic model
  publication-title: J. Dairy Res
  doi: 10.1017/S0022029900025231
– volume: 143
  start-page: 262
  year: 2017
  ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0038
  article-title: The agreement between two next-generation laser methane detectors and respiration chamber facilities in recording methane concentrations in the spent air produced by dairy cows
  publication-title: Comput. Electron. Agr
  doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2017.10.024
– volume-title: Nutrient requirements of beef cattle
  year: 2016
  ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0025
– volume: 15
  start-page: 100070
  year: 2021
  ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0033
  article-title: Application of the laser methane detector for measurements in freely grazing goats: impact on animals’ behaviour and methane emissions
  publication-title: Animal
  doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2020.100070
– volume: 5
  start-page: 588
  year: 2012
  ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0034
  article-title: An efficient algorithm for automatic peak detection in noisy periodic and quasi-periodic signals
  publication-title: Algorithms
  doi: 10.3390/a5040588
– volume: 92
  start-page: 5239
  year: 2014
  ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0031
  article-title: Evaluation of the laser methane detector to estimate methane emissions from ewes and steers
  publication-title: J. Anim. Sci
  doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-7676
– volume: 150
  start-page: 110
  year: 2018
  ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0032
  article-title: Using a portable laser methane detector in goats to assess diurnal, diet- and position-dependent variations in enteric methane emissions
  publication-title: Comput. Electron. Agric
  doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.04.010
– volume-title: Mixdist: finite mixture distribution models
  year: 2018
  ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0022
– volume: 8
  start-page: 1
  year: 2018
  ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0023
  article-title: Enteric methane output from selected herds of beef cattle raised under extensive arid rangelands
  publication-title: Pastoralism
  doi: 10.1186/s13570-018-0121-9
– volume: 31
  start-page: 1381
  year: 2018
  ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0035
  article-title: Editorial: Guidelines for experimental design and statistical analyses in animal studies submitted for publication in the Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences.
  publication-title: Asian-Austral. J. Anim
  doi: 10.5713/ajas.18.0468
– volume: 36
  start-page: 1
  year: 1976
  ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0024
  article-title: Rates of production of methane in the rumen and large intestine of sheep.
  publication-title: Brit. J. Nutr
  doi: 10.1079/BJN19760053
– volume: 48
  start-page: 21
  year: 2008
  ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0002
  article-title: Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: a review
  publication-title: Aust. J. Exp. Agr
  doi: 10.1071/EA07199
– volume: 44
  start-page: 12
  year: 2014
  ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0010
  article-title: Methane production in different breeds, grazing different pastures or fed a total mixed ration, as measured by a Laser Methane Detector
  publication-title: S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci
  doi: 10.4314/sajas.v44i5.3
– volume: 11
  start-page: 3228
  year: 2012
  ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0020
  article-title: Prediction of ruminal methane production from cattle
  publication-title: J. Anim. Vet. Adv
  doi: 10.3923/javaa.2012.3228.3233
– volume: 12
  start-page: 628
  year: 2020
  ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0027
  article-title: Enteric methane emissions of dairy cattle considering breed composition, pasture management, housing conditions and feeding characteristics along a rural-urban gradient in a rising megacity
  publication-title: Agriculture
  doi: 10.3390/agriculture10120628
– volume: 73
  start-page: 2483
  year: 1995
  ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0015
  article-title: Methane emissions from cattle
  publication-title: J. Anim. Sci
  doi: 10.2527/1995.7382483x
– volume: 102
  start-page: 6242
  year: 2019
  ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0042
  article-title: Technical note: evaluation of interval between measurements and calculation method for the quantification of enteric methane emissions measured by respiration chamber
  publication-title: J. Dairy Sci
  doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-16245
– volume: 112
  start-page: 29
  year: 2004
  ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0008
  article-title: The Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System model for evaluating herd nutrition and nutrient excretion
  publication-title: Anim. Feed Sci. Tech
  doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2003.10.006
– volume: 82
  start-page: 1
  year: 2017
  ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0019
  article-title: lmerTest Package: tests in linear mixed effects models
  publication-title: J. Stat. Sofw
– volume: 54
  start-page: 1737
  year: 2014
  ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0039
  article-title: Methane emissions and feeding behaviour of feedlot cattle supplemented with nitrate or urea
  publication-title: Anim. Prod. Sci
  doi: 10.1071/AN14345
– volume: 68
  start-page: 157
  year: 2009
  ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0004
  article-title: On the use of a laser methane detector in dairy cows
  publication-title: Comput. Electron. Agr
  doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2009.05.008
– start-page: 151
  volume-title: Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
  year: 2014
  ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0012
– volume: 1
  start-page: 329
  year: 2015
  ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0041
  article-title: A mathematical model to describe the diurnal pattern of enteric methane emissions from non-lactating dairy cows post-feeding
  publication-title: Anim. Nutr
  doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2015.11.009
– volume-title: R: A language and environment for statistical computing
  year: 2020
  ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0028
– volume: 9
  start-page: 837
  year: 2019
  ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0009
  article-title: Comparison of methods to measure methane for use in genetic evaluation of dairy cattle
  publication-title: Animals
  doi: 10.3390/ani9100837
– volume: 69
  start-page: 1
  year: 2016
  ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0021
  article-title: Least-squares means: the R package lsmeans
  publication-title: J. Stat. Sofw
– volume: 26
  start-page: 289
  year: 1983
  ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0040
  article-title: Rumen motility in sheep and cattle given different diets
  publication-title: New Zealand J. Agric. Res
  doi: 10.1080/00288233.1983.10427032
– volume: 103
  start-page: 2024
  year: 2020
  ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0007
  article-title: Accuracy of methane emissions predicted from milk mid-infrared spectra and measured by laser methane detectors in Brown Swiss dairy cows
  publication-title: J. Dairy Sci
  doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-17101
– volume: 165
  start-page: 8
  year: 2011
  ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0005
  article-title: Do methane measurements from a laser detector and an indirect open-circuit respiration calorimetric chamber agree sufficiently closely?
  publication-title: Anim. Feed Sci. Tech
  doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.02.005
– volume: 10
  start-page: 606
  year: 2020
  ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0026
  article-title: Repeatability and reproducibility of measures of bovine methane emissions recorded using a laser detector
  publication-title: Animals
  doi: 10.3390/ani10040606
– volume: 58
  start-page: 1
  year: 2016
  ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0014
  article-title: Evaluation of feed value of a by-product of pickled radish for ruminants: analyses of nutrient composition, storage stability, and in vitro ruminal fermentation
  publication-title: J. Anim. Sci. Technol
  doi: 10.1186/s40781-016-0117-1
– start-page: 176
  volume-title: Modelling nutrient digestion and utilisation in farm animals
  year: 2011
  ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0006
  article-title: Fluctuations in methane emission in response to feeding pattern in lactating dairy cows.
  doi: 10.3920/978-90-8686-712-7_19
– volume: 9
  start-page: 563
  year: 2019
  ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0030
  article-title: Comparison between non-invasive methane measurement techniques in cattle
  publication-title: Animals
  doi: 10.3390/ani9080563
– volume: 153
  start-page: 285
  year: 2018
  ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0037
  article-title: Comparison of a laser methane detector with the GreenFeed and two breath analysers for on-farm measurements of methane emissions from dairy cows
  publication-title: Comput. Electron. Agric
  doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.08.024
– volume: 54
  start-page: 1350
  year: 2014
  ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0016
  article-title: Feeding lucerne silage to beef cattle at three allowances and four feeding frequencies affects circadian patterns of methane emissions, but not emissions per unit of intake
  publication-title: Anim. Prod. Sci
  doi: 10.1071/AN14235
– volume: 97
  start-page: 3231
  year: 2014
  ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0017
  article-title: Invited review: enteric methane in dairy cattle production: quantifying the opportunities and impact of reducing emissions
  publication-title: J. Dairy Sci
  doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7234
– volume: 1
  start-page: 38
  year: 2022
  ident: 2022081814441937000_CIT0036
  article-title: Measuring livestock CH4 emissions with the laser methane detector: a review
  publication-title: Methane
  doi: 10.3390/methane1010004
SSID ssj0012595
Score 2.4292722
Snippet Abstract The hand-held laser methane detector (LMD) technique has been suggested as an alternative method for measuring methane (CH4) emissions from enteric...
The hand-held laser methane detector (LMD) technique has been suggested as an alternative method for measuring methane (CH4) emissions from enteric...
SourceID unpaywall
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
oup
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
SubjectTerms Agriculture
Algorithms
Animal Feed - analysis
Animals
Body Weight
Cattle
Correlation coefficient
Correlation coefficients
Data processing
Diet
Diet - veterinary
Distribution functions
Emission measurements
Emissions
Energy
Eructation - metabolism
Eructation - veterinary
Evaluation
Experiments
Fermentation
Hydrofluorocarbons
Intensive farming
Lasers
Measurement methods
Methane
Methane - metabolism
Respiration
Rumen - metabolism
Ruminant Nutrition
Title Application of a hand-held laser methane detector for measuring enteric methane emissions from cattle in intensive farming
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35671336
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2712365615
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2674347327
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9387598
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/9387598
UnpaywallVersion submittedVersion
Volume 100
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVAQN
  databaseName: PubMed Central
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1525-3163
  dateEnd: 20241102
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0012595
  issn: 1525-3163
  databaseCode: RPM
  dateStart: 20170101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/
  providerName: National Library of Medicine
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: ProQuest Technology Collection
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1525-3163
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0012595
  issn: 1525-3163
  databaseCode: 8FG
  dateStart: 19971001
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1
  providerName: ProQuest
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Lb9NAEB616QE4lGfBUMIilQvSJn6tH8cIESokKoSIVE7W7nq3DXWdKHFU0V_PjF80gCq4Wd6RXzv2fp755huAoxwBGwJpy1Ua-zy0ruZSypxHRivi5ypdSwp9OomOZ-HHU3G6A15XC1OT9rWaj8riclTOz2tu5fJSjzue2DgNEGKnyS7sRQLh9wD2ZiefJ98aKofHk6TJcApfcHRe0W97dVc1Ep_hMX6S21o9_KEff5fr8fpCat_ztlanrYq3G8DzT_7knU25lD-uZFHcWJym9-FLd1sNJ-VitKnUSF__pvj4X_f9APZbqMomzdBD2DHlI7g3OVu1ch3mMVxPfuW_2cIyySgQz89NkTOE5WbFqEO1LA3LTVXnBxiCZNxJgUlcNBkpguLxejPqPkfxuzWjuhema4llNi_ZvKPaMyuJvnP2BGbT91_fHfO2mwPXYehW3CapiINUJrFOqC5RCIP_MgY9wyBMINWgVJFegFSxCUzuIpBwA41LSaBtJJQMDmBQLkrzDJiMXOu5VrlW6FCoSFrEsTr3AhkpmdjUgbfdLGa6lTqnjhtF1qTcgwynPGun3IGj3njZKHz83ewVusPtFoedq2Tth2Cd-THJ2yBIFQ687ofxWVJeBp_rYoM2VAgSxoEfO_C08az-PIGIKIwQORBv-VxvQPLg2yPoPbVMeOswDrzpvfO2y3_-j3Yv4K5PJSA1CfIQBtVqY14iMKvUEHaT6YdhHTEbtq_lT1sdPPE
linkProvider Unpaywall
linkToUnpaywall http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Nb9NAEB2V9AAc-IYaCixSuSBtYnu9_jhGiKpCokKISOVk7a5321DXiRJHFf31zPiLBlAFtyg7imPvs_d5580bgIMCCRsSacd1loQ8cr7hSqmCx9Zo0udq01gKfTqOj2bRxxN5sgNBXwvTiPaNno-r8mJczc8abeXywkx6ndgkE0ixs_QW7MYS6fcIdmfHn6ffWilHwNO0zXDKUHIErxw-B01XNTKf4Qk-krtaPXyhn3xX68n6XJkwCLZWp62Kt2vE80_95O1NtVQ_LlVZXlucDu_Dl_60Wk3K-XhT67G5-s3x8b_O-wHc66gqm7ZDD2HHVo_g7vR01dl12MdwNf2V_2YLxxSjjXh-ZsuCIS23K0YdqlVlWWHrJj_AkCTjl7QxiYsmI0dQ_L0hjLrP0f7dmlHdCzONxTKbV2zeS-2ZUyTfOX0Cs8MPX98f8a6bAzdR5NfcpZlMRKbSxKRUlyilxXcZi8iwSBPINSjT5BegdGKFLXwkEr4wuJQI42KplXgKo2pR2T1gKvZd4DvtO2kiqWPlkMeaIhAq1ip1mQfv-lnMTWd1Th03yrxNuYscpzzvptyDgyF42Tp8_D3sNcLh5oj9Hip59yBY52FC9jZIUqUHb4ZhvJaUl8HruthgDBWCRIkIEw-etcgajiNkTNsIsQfJFuaGALIH3x5B9DQ24R1gPHg7oPOmv__8H-NewJ2QSkAaEeQ-jOrVxr5EYlbrV92t-BORejr7
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Application+of+a+hand-held+laser+methane+detector+for+measuring+enteric+methane+emissions+from+cattle+in+intensive+farming&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+animal+science&rft.au=Kang%2C+Kyewon&rft.au=Cho%2C+Hyunjin&rft.au=Jeong%2C+Sinyong&rft.au=Jeon%2C+Seoyoung&rft.date=2022-08-01&rft.issn=1525-3163&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093%2Fjas%2Fskac211&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0021-8812&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0021-8812&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0021-8812&client=summon