The conservative treatment of congenital scoliosis with hemivertebra: Report of three cases

Scoliosis is the most common type of congenital vertebral disease. This spinal disorder may be due to a failure of formation, segmentation, or a combination thereof. Complete failure of formation causes hemivertebra which can lead to unbalanced growth and deformation. Statistically, 25% of congenita...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in pediatrics Vol. 10; p. 951832
Main Authors Caredda, Matteo, Bandinelli, Diletta, Falciglia, Francesco, Giordano, Marco, Aulisa, Angelo Gabriele
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Frontiers Media S.A 09.11.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2296-2360
2296-2360
DOI10.3389/fped.2022.951832

Cover

Abstract Scoliosis is the most common type of congenital vertebral disease. This spinal disorder may be due to a failure of formation, segmentation, or a combination thereof. Complete failure of formation causes hemivertebra which can lead to unbalanced growth and deformation. Statistically, 25% of congenital curves do not evolve, 25% progress slightly, while the remaining 50% develop quickly and require treatment. Hemivertebrae can be divided into three types: non-segmented, semi-segmented, and fully-segmented. The fully-segmented types are most likely to progress. Hemivertebra in the thoracolumbar region shows higher rates of progression compared with those in the lumbar area. The treatment may be either conservative or surgical. In general, bracing is not recommended in short and rigid curves, although it may help process secondary curves.IntroductionScoliosis is the most common type of congenital vertebral disease. This spinal disorder may be due to a failure of formation, segmentation, or a combination thereof. Complete failure of formation causes hemivertebra which can lead to unbalanced growth and deformation. Statistically, 25% of congenital curves do not evolve, 25% progress slightly, while the remaining 50% develop quickly and require treatment. Hemivertebrae can be divided into three types: non-segmented, semi-segmented, and fully-segmented. The fully-segmented types are most likely to progress. Hemivertebra in the thoracolumbar region shows higher rates of progression compared with those in the lumbar area. The treatment may be either conservative or surgical. In general, bracing is not recommended in short and rigid curves, although it may help process secondary curves.To assess the effectiveness of bracing in congenital scoliosis due to hemivertebra.ObjectiveTo assess the effectiveness of bracing in congenital scoliosis due to hemivertebra.Searching in our database, we found three cases of patients with congenital scoliosis due to fully-segmented hemivertebra. The first of them was 6 years old at the time of diagnosis with a fully-segmented hemivertebra in L5, determining an L1-L5 (S1) lumbar curve. The second one was 10 years old at the time of diagnosis with a fully-segmented hemivertebra in L2 and a T11-L4 (L5 sacralized) thoracolumbar curve. The last one was 3 years old at the time of diagnosis with a fully-segmented hemivertebra in L3 (in six lumbar bodies), determining a thoracolumbar curve T12-L4.Cases presentationSearching in our database, we found three cases of patients with congenital scoliosis due to fully-segmented hemivertebra. The first of them was 6 years old at the time of diagnosis with a fully-segmented hemivertebra in L5, determining an L1-L5 (S1) lumbar curve. The second one was 10 years old at the time of diagnosis with a fully-segmented hemivertebra in L2 and a T11-L4 (L5 sacralized) thoracolumbar curve. The last one was 3 years old at the time of diagnosis with a fully-segmented hemivertebra in L3 (in six lumbar bodies), determining a thoracolumbar curve T12-L4.We utilized a Milwaukee brace for the first patient, a Boston brace for the second patient, and a Progressive Action Short Brace (PASB) for the third patient. At the beginning of the treatment, the Cobb angles measured 23°, 53°, and 25°, respectively. During treatment, the Cobb angles measured 22°, 35°, and 15°, respectively. At the end of treatment, the Cobb angles measured 18°, 45°, and 12°, respectively. At long-term follow-up, the curves measured 20°, 45°, and 12° Cobb angles, respectively.ResultsWe utilized a Milwaukee brace for the first patient, a Boston brace for the second patient, and a Progressive Action Short Brace (PASB) for the third patient. At the beginning of the treatment, the Cobb angles measured 23°, 53°, and 25°, respectively. During treatment, the Cobb angles measured 22°, 35°, and 15°, respectively. At the end of treatment, the Cobb angles measured 18°, 45°, and 12°, respectively. At long-term follow-up, the curves measured 20°, 45°, and 12° Cobb angles, respectively.Comparing our cases with those found in the literature we can confirm the ability of conservative treatment to change the natural history of congenital lumbar scoliosis due to failure of formation. From our experience, in all cases of CS with hemivertebra, before considering a surgical approach, conservative treatment should be implemented as early as possible without waiting for the progressive deformation of the adjacent normal vertebrae.ConclusionsComparing our cases with those found in the literature we can confirm the ability of conservative treatment to change the natural history of congenital lumbar scoliosis due to failure of formation. From our experience, in all cases of CS with hemivertebra, before considering a surgical approach, conservative treatment should be implemented as early as possible without waiting for the progressive deformation of the adjacent normal vertebrae.
AbstractList IntroductionScoliosis is the most common type of congenital vertebral disease. This spinal disorder may be due to a failure of formation, segmentation, or a combination thereof. Complete failure of formation causes hemivertebra which can lead to unbalanced growth and deformation. Statistically, 25% of congenital curves do not evolve, 25% progress slightly, while the remaining 50% develop quickly and require treatment. Hemivertebrae can be divided into three types: non-segmented, semi-segmented, and fully-segmented. The fully-segmented types are most likely to progress. Hemivertebra in the thoracolumbar region shows higher rates of progression compared with those in the lumbar area. The treatment may be either conservative or surgical. In general, bracing is not recommended in short and rigid curves, although it may help process secondary curves.ObjectiveTo assess the effectiveness of bracing in congenital scoliosis due to hemivertebra.Cases presentationSearching in our database, we found three cases of patients with congenital scoliosis due to fully-segmented hemivertebra. The first of them was 6 years old at the time of diagnosis with a fully-segmented hemivertebra in L5, determining an L1-L5 (S1) lumbar curve. The second one was 10 years old at the time of diagnosis with a fully-segmented hemivertebra in L2 and a T11-L4 (L5 sacralized) thoracolumbar curve. The last one was 3 years old at the time of diagnosis with a fully-segmented hemivertebra in L3 (in six lumbar bodies), determining a thoracolumbar curve T12-L4.ResultsWe utilized a Milwaukee brace for the first patient, a Boston brace for the second patient, and a Progressive Action Short Brace (PASB) for the third patient. At the beginning of the treatment, the Cobb angles measured 23°, 53°, and 25°, respectively. During treatment, the Cobb angles measured 22°, 35°, and 15°, respectively. At the end of treatment, the Cobb angles measured 18°, 45°, and 12°, respectively. At long-term follow-up, the curves measured 20°, 45°, and 12° Cobb angles, respectively.ConclusionsComparing our cases with those found in the literature we can confirm the ability of conservative treatment to change the natural history of congenital lumbar scoliosis due to failure of formation. From our experience, in all cases of CS with hemivertebra, before considering a surgical approach, conservative treatment should be implemented as early as possible without waiting for the progressive deformation of the adjacent normal vertebrae.
Scoliosis is the most common type of congenital vertebral disease. This spinal disorder may be due to a failure of formation, segmentation, or a combination thereof. Complete failure of formation causes hemivertebra which can lead to unbalanced growth and deformation. Statistically, 25% of congenital curves do not evolve, 25% progress slightly, while the remaining 50% develop quickly and require treatment. Hemivertebrae can be divided into three types: non-segmented, semi-segmented, and fully-segmented. The fully-segmented types are most likely to progress. Hemivertebra in the thoracolumbar region shows higher rates of progression compared with those in the lumbar area. The treatment may be either conservative or surgical. In general, bracing is not recommended in short and rigid curves, although it may help process secondary curves.IntroductionScoliosis is the most common type of congenital vertebral disease. This spinal disorder may be due to a failure of formation, segmentation, or a combination thereof. Complete failure of formation causes hemivertebra which can lead to unbalanced growth and deformation. Statistically, 25% of congenital curves do not evolve, 25% progress slightly, while the remaining 50% develop quickly and require treatment. Hemivertebrae can be divided into three types: non-segmented, semi-segmented, and fully-segmented. The fully-segmented types are most likely to progress. Hemivertebra in the thoracolumbar region shows higher rates of progression compared with those in the lumbar area. The treatment may be either conservative or surgical. In general, bracing is not recommended in short and rigid curves, although it may help process secondary curves.To assess the effectiveness of bracing in congenital scoliosis due to hemivertebra.ObjectiveTo assess the effectiveness of bracing in congenital scoliosis due to hemivertebra.Searching in our database, we found three cases of patients with congenital scoliosis due to fully-segmented hemivertebra. The first of them was 6 years old at the time of diagnosis with a fully-segmented hemivertebra in L5, determining an L1-L5 (S1) lumbar curve. The second one was 10 years old at the time of diagnosis with a fully-segmented hemivertebra in L2 and a T11-L4 (L5 sacralized) thoracolumbar curve. The last one was 3 years old at the time of diagnosis with a fully-segmented hemivertebra in L3 (in six lumbar bodies), determining a thoracolumbar curve T12-L4.Cases presentationSearching in our database, we found three cases of patients with congenital scoliosis due to fully-segmented hemivertebra. The first of them was 6 years old at the time of diagnosis with a fully-segmented hemivertebra in L5, determining an L1-L5 (S1) lumbar curve. The second one was 10 years old at the time of diagnosis with a fully-segmented hemivertebra in L2 and a T11-L4 (L5 sacralized) thoracolumbar curve. The last one was 3 years old at the time of diagnosis with a fully-segmented hemivertebra in L3 (in six lumbar bodies), determining a thoracolumbar curve T12-L4.We utilized a Milwaukee brace for the first patient, a Boston brace for the second patient, and a Progressive Action Short Brace (PASB) for the third patient. At the beginning of the treatment, the Cobb angles measured 23°, 53°, and 25°, respectively. During treatment, the Cobb angles measured 22°, 35°, and 15°, respectively. At the end of treatment, the Cobb angles measured 18°, 45°, and 12°, respectively. At long-term follow-up, the curves measured 20°, 45°, and 12° Cobb angles, respectively.ResultsWe utilized a Milwaukee brace for the first patient, a Boston brace for the second patient, and a Progressive Action Short Brace (PASB) for the third patient. At the beginning of the treatment, the Cobb angles measured 23°, 53°, and 25°, respectively. During treatment, the Cobb angles measured 22°, 35°, and 15°, respectively. At the end of treatment, the Cobb angles measured 18°, 45°, and 12°, respectively. At long-term follow-up, the curves measured 20°, 45°, and 12° Cobb angles, respectively.Comparing our cases with those found in the literature we can confirm the ability of conservative treatment to change the natural history of congenital lumbar scoliosis due to failure of formation. From our experience, in all cases of CS with hemivertebra, before considering a surgical approach, conservative treatment should be implemented as early as possible without waiting for the progressive deformation of the adjacent normal vertebrae.ConclusionsComparing our cases with those found in the literature we can confirm the ability of conservative treatment to change the natural history of congenital lumbar scoliosis due to failure of formation. From our experience, in all cases of CS with hemivertebra, before considering a surgical approach, conservative treatment should be implemented as early as possible without waiting for the progressive deformation of the adjacent normal vertebrae.
Author Giordano, Marco
Caredda, Matteo
Bandinelli, Diletta
Falciglia, Francesco
Aulisa, Angelo Gabriele
AuthorAffiliation 1 Department of Aging, Neurological, Orthopedic and Head-Neck Sciences, Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IRCCS) , Rome , Italy
2 Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital (IRCCS) , Rome , Italy
3 Department of Human, Social and Health Sciences, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio , Cassino , Italy
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 2 Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital (IRCCS) , Rome , Italy
– name: 1 Department of Aging, Neurological, Orthopedic and Head-Neck Sciences, Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IRCCS) , Rome , Italy
– name: 3 Department of Human, Social and Health Sciences, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio , Cassino , Italy
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Matteo
  surname: Caredda
  fullname: Caredda, Matteo
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Diletta
  surname: Bandinelli
  fullname: Bandinelli, Diletta
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Francesco
  surname: Falciglia
  fullname: Falciglia, Francesco
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Marco
  surname: Giordano
  fullname: Giordano, Marco
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Angelo Gabriele
  surname: Aulisa
  fullname: Aulisa, Angelo Gabriele
BookMark eNp1kc9LHDEUx4Mo1Kp3j3PsZdf8mEwmHgpF2iosCKInDyGTvOxEZibbJLvS_74Zdwu1YA7J473v90N438_oeAoTIHRJ8JKxVl65DdglxZQuJScto0folFLZLChr8PE_9Sd0kdILLkcKzAk_Rc-PPVQmTAniTme_gypH0HmEKVfBzZM1TD7roUomDD4kn6pXn_uqh7GoY4Yu6uvqATYhvjlyH6EQdYJ0jk6cHhJcHN4z9PTj--PN7WJ1__Pu5ttqYWom84K3vAbrym1qigUHbmvNWMNagk3LnNSYU6ONbTkrfWCuFQ0XrO4oBt5hdobu9lwb9IvaRD_q-FsF7dVbI8S10jF7M4BqZAMdEYJawmuCcecYNZbZzjqjrekK6-uetdl2I1hT9hD18A76fjL5Xq3DTsmmpYSIAvhyAMTwawspq9EnA8OgJwjbpKiosSS4FrxIm73UxJBSBKdM2XT2YSb7QRGs5nTVnK6a01X7dIsR_2f8-78PLX8AG_6scA
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_5435_JAAOSGlobal_D_24_00093
Cites_doi 10.1007/s00586-015-4100-1
10.1186/1748-7161-6-12
10.1097/BPO.0b013e318269c438
10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181af1caf
10.1007/s00586-003-0555-6
10.1097/BPO.0b013e31802b4993
10.2174/1573396312666151117121011
10.2106/JBJS.I.01471
10.1302/0301-620X.68B4.3733836
10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181abf69e
10.1007/s11999-010-1622-z
10.2106/00004623-198264080-00003
10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bad56e
10.1097/BPO.0000000000000922
10.1007/s00381-018-3915-6
10.1007/s00586-018-5604-2
10.1016/j.jspd.2013.05.006
10.2106/00004623-196850010-00002
10.2106/00004623-197557040-00003
10.1530/EOR-21-0121
10.1186/1748-7161-4-S2-O45
10.2174/1874325001913010008
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2022 Caredda, Bandinelli, Falciglia, Giordano and Aulisa.
Copyright © 2022 Caredda, Bandinelli, Falciglia, Giordano and Aulisa. 2022 Caredda, Bandinelli, Falciglia, Giordano and Aulisa
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2022 Caredda, Bandinelli, Falciglia, Giordano and Aulisa.
– notice: Copyright © 2022 Caredda, Bandinelli, Falciglia, Giordano and Aulisa. 2022 Caredda, Bandinelli, Falciglia, Giordano and Aulisa
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.3389/fped.2022.951832
DatabaseName CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ : directory of open access journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals - NZ
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 2296-2360
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_696eb1772d154100bf32cd3dbdfcadcb
PMC9682117
10_3389_fped_2022_951832
GroupedDBID 53G
5VS
9T4
AAFWJ
AAYXX
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACXDI
ADBBV
ADRAZ
AFPKN
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
BAWUL
BCNDV
CITATION
DIK
EMOBN
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HYE
KQ8
M48
M~E
OK1
PGMZT
RNS
RPM
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-5854edf854c42075e5d4a3363810c83f9a052cacd853a33e3f8765734b20e5b03
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 2296-2360
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:26:12 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:39:43 EDT 2025
Thu Sep 04 21:18:37 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:10:19 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:07:49 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Language English
License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c439t-5854edf854c42075e5d4a3363810c83f9a052cacd853a33e3f8765734b20e5b03
Notes ObjectType-Case Study-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-4
content type line 23
ObjectType-Report-1
ObjectType-Article-3
Edited by: Mei-chun Cheung, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, China
Reviewed by: Marco Sapienza, University of Catania, Italy; Jean Claude De Mauroy, Independent Researcher, St Didier de la Tour, France
This article was submitted to Pediatric Orthopedics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pediatrics
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/696eb1772d154100bf32cd3dbdfcadcb
PQID 2740910475
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_696eb1772d154100bf32cd3dbdfcadcb
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9682117
proquest_miscellaneous_2740910475
crossref_citationtrail_10_3389_fped_2022_951832
crossref_primary_10_3389_fped_2022_951832
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2022-11-09
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2022-11-09
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2022
  text: 2022-11-09
  day: 09
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationTitle Frontiers in pediatrics
PublicationYear 2022
Publisher Frontiers Media S.A
Publisher_xml – name: Frontiers Media S.A
References Cheneau (B16) 2009; 4
McMaster (B10) 1986; 68
Cho (B11) 2018; 27
Weiss (B15) 2016; 12
Mackel (B6) 2018; 34
Karol (B18) 2011; 469
Nasca (B9) 1975; 57
Marks (B12) 2009; 34
Canavese (B23) 2016; 25
Kaspiris (B2) 2011; 6
Baulesh (B20) 2012; 32
Hedequist (B4) 2007; 27
Pahys (B17) 2016; 38
Hensinger (B5) 2009; 34
Winter (B8) 1968; 50
Weiss (B14) 2008; 140
Johnston (B21) 2013; 1
Arlet (B3) 2003; 12
Weiss (B22) 2019; 13
Sebaaly (B13) 2022; 7
McMaster (B1) 1982
Bess (B19) 2010; 92
Winter (B7) 2010; 35
References_xml – volume: 25
  start-page: 487
  year: 2016
  ident: B23
  article-title: Serial elongation, derotation and flexion (EDF) casting under general anesthesia and neuromuscular blocking drugs improve outcome in patients with juvenile scoliosis: preliminary results
  publication-title: Eur Spine J
  doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4100-1
– volume: 6
  start-page: 12
  year: 2011
  ident: B2
  article-title: Surgical and conservative treatment of patients with congenital scoliosis: α search for long-term results
  publication-title: Scoliosis
  doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-6-12
– volume: 140
  start-page: 310
  year: 2008
  ident: B14
  article-title: Congenital scoliosis—presentation of three severe cases treated conservatively
  publication-title: Stud Health Technol Inform.
– volume: 32
  start-page: 658
  year: 2012
  ident: B20
  article-title: The role of serial casting in early-onset scoliosis (EOS)
  publication-title: J Pediatr Orthop
  doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318269c438
– volume: 34
  start-page: 1751
  year: 2009
  ident: B12
  article-title: The natural history of congenital scoliosis and kyphosis
  publication-title: Spine
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181af1caf
– volume: 12
  start-page: 456
  year: 2003
  ident: B3
  article-title: Congenital scoliosis
  publication-title: Eur Spine J.
  doi: 10.1007/s00586-003-0555-6
– volume: 27
  start-page: 106
  year: 2007
  ident: B4
  article-title: Congenital scoliosis
  publication-title: J Pediatr Orthopaedics
  doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e31802b4993
– volume: 12
  start-page: 43
  year: 2016
  ident: B15
  article-title: Congenital scoliosis (Mini-review)
  publication-title: Current Pediatr Rev
  doi: 10.2174/1573396312666151117121011
– volume: 92
  start-page: 2533
  year: 2010
  ident: B19
  article-title: Complications of growing-rod treatment for early-onset scoliosis: analysis of one hundred and forty patients
  publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am.
  doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01471
– volume: 68
  start-page: 588
  year: 1986
  ident: B10
  article-title: Hemivertebra as a cause of scoliosis. A study of 104 patients
  publication-title: J Bone Joint
  doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.68B4.3733836
– volume: 34
  start-page: 1745
  year: 2009
  ident: B5
  article-title: Congenital scoliosis
  publication-title: Spine
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181abf69e
– volume: 469
  start-page: 1323
  year: 2011
  ident: B18
  article-title: Early definitive spinal fusion in young children: what we have learned
  publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res.
  doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1622-z
– year: 1982
  ident: B1
  article-title: The natural history of congenital scoliosis. A study of two hundred and fifty-one patients
  publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg.
  doi: 10.2106/00004623-198264080-00003
– volume: 35
  start-page: E49
  year: 2010
  ident: B7
  article-title: Scoliosis secondary to a hemivertebra
  publication-title: Spine
  doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bad56e
– volume: 38
  start-page: e172
  year: 2016
  ident: B17
  article-title: What's new in congenital scoliosis?
  publication-title: J Pediatr Orthopaedics
  doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000922
– volume: 34
  start-page: 2155
  year: 2018
  ident: B6
  article-title: A comprehensive review of the diagnosis and management of congenital scoliosis
  publication-title: Child's Nervous Syst
  doi: 10.1007/s00381-018-3915-6
– volume: 27
  start-page: 533
  year: 2018
  ident: B11
  article-title: The etiology of congenital scoliosis: genetic vs. environmental – a report of three monozygotic twin cases
  publication-title: Eur Spine J
  doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5604-2
– volume: 1
  start-page: 339
  year: 2013
  ident: B21
  article-title: Growing Spine Study Group Comparison of growing rod instrumentation versus serial cast treatment for early-onset scoliosis
  publication-title: Spine Deform
  doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2013.05.006
– volume: 50
  start-page: 1
  year: 1968
  ident: B8
  article-title: Congenital Scoliosis a study of 234 patients treated and untreated Part I: natural history
  publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg
  doi: 10.2106/00004623-196850010-00002
– volume: 57
  start-page: 456
  year: 1975
  ident: B9
  article-title: Progression of congenital scoliosis due to hemivertebrae and hemivertebrae with bars
  publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am
  doi: 10.2106/00004623-197557040-00003
– volume: 7
  start-page: 318
  year: 2022
  ident: B13
  article-title: Congenital scoliosis: a narrative review and proposal of a treatment algorithm
  publication-title: EFORT Open Rev
  doi: 10.1530/EOR-21-0121
– volume: 4
  start-page: O45
  year: 2009
  ident: B16
  article-title: Treatment of the congenital scoliosis by Cheneau brace: 2 year follow-up
  doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-4-S2-O45
– volume: 13
  start-page: 8
  year: 2019
  ident: B22
  article-title: Conservative treatment of congenital scoliosis–case report with a history of 22 years
  publication-title: Open Orthopaedics J
  doi: 10.2174/1874325001913010008
SSID ssj0000970515
Score 2.2187173
Snippet Scoliosis is the most common type of congenital vertebral disease. This spinal disorder may be due to a failure of formation, segmentation, or a combination...
IntroductionScoliosis is the most common type of congenital vertebral disease. This spinal disorder may be due to a failure of formation, segmentation, or a...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
StartPage 951832
SubjectTerms bracing
congenital scoliosis (CS)
conservative treatment (CT)
failure of formation
hemivertebra
Pediatrics
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ : directory of open access journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV07T8MwELZQB8SCeIrykpFYGELT2I5jNkBUFVKZqFSJwXL8EJVQikjK7-cuSatmgYUlg504yd3Z9118-Y6Qa2W4kwGTwnwwEKAYGakcGWgZzK7Mu9wr_N958pKOp_x5JmYbpb4wJ6yhB24EN0hV6pEiKXHg7IdxnAeWWMdc7oI1zua4-oIb2wim6jVYSSxe0uxLQhSmBuHTIzFoktwCpshY0vFDNV1_B2N2MyQ3XM5oj-y2WJHeN8-4T7Z8cUC2J-1u-CF5Ax1Ti-nQ9YfVb0_XaeN0EbAHrAOLgtAS1D1flPOS4ndXiiQBWIcZN43vaIPB8YoKFAsjgmMrj8h09PT6OI7aYgmRBUxRRQD7uXcBjpYngAO8cNwwliKDl81YUCYWiTXWgX-Gds8CrINCMp4nsRd5zI5Jr1gU_oRQ5kKQgEMsDMj9UBoRBEu5z0DdMXeiTwYr0WnbMoljQYsPDREFClujsDUKWzfC7pOb9RWfDYvGL-c-oDbW5yH_dd0AVqFbq9B_WUWfXK10qWG-4CaIKfxiWWqIwhEicQmvITtK7tyx21PM32vmbZVmEDDL0_94xDOyg29d_9eozkmv-lr6CwA4VX5Z2_IPbQT9dQ
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
Title The conservative treatment of congenital scoliosis with hemivertebra: Report of three cases
URI https://www.proquest.com/docview/2740910475
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9682117
https://doaj.org/article/696eb1772d154100bf32cd3dbdfcadcb
Volume 10
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1LS8QwEA4-QLyIT1xfRPDioVqTtNkIIiqKCOvJBcFDSPPQhaXV7Sr6751p62pBBC-FNk1KZyaZb_L4hpA9ZYSTATeF-WAgQDEyUhky0HLoXV3vMq_wvHPvNr3ui5v75P77eHQjwPLX0A7zSfVHw4P3l49T6PAnGHGCvz0Mzx45Pxk7ALgAFjpNZsEvMbTxXgP2q3FZSUxogtnmmEojxtO4Xrf8tZGWn6ro_FsYtL2D8odLulokCw2WpGe18pfIlM-XyVyvWS1fIQ9gA9Tidulq4vXN08m2cloELAHrwaQhtARzGBTloKQ4L0uRRADzNOOi8jGtMTrWGIPioUVwfOUq6V9d3l1cR00yhcgC5hhHEBYI7wJcrWCAE3zihOE8RYYv2-VBmThh1lgH_hueex5gnEwkFxmLfZLFfI3M5EXu1wnlLgQJOMVCg8IfSZOEhKfCd8EcYuGSDjn8Ep22DdM4JrwYaog4UNgaha1R2LoWdofsT2o81ywbf7x7jtqYvIf82NWDYvSom-6mU5V6JNZiDiDiURxngTPruMtcsMbZrEN2v3SpoT_hIonJffFaaojSEUIJCb8hW0pufbFdkg-eKmZulXYhoJYb__idTTKPd9XxRrVFZsajV78NOGec7VTzAzuVEX8CgvH9ig
linkProvider Scholars Portal
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+conservative+treatment+of+congenital+scoliosis+with+hemivertebra%3A+Report+of+three+cases&rft.jtitle=Frontiers+in+pediatrics&rft.au=Caredda%2C+Matteo&rft.au=Bandinelli%2C+Diletta&rft.au=Falciglia%2C+Francesco&rft.au=Giordano%2C+Marco&rft.date=2022-11-09&rft.issn=2296-2360&rft.eissn=2296-2360&rft.volume=10&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389%2Ffped.2022.951832&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_3389_fped_2022_951832
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2296-2360&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2296-2360&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2296-2360&client=summon