Are atmospheric updrafts a key to unlocking climate forcing and sensitivity?

• Published in: Atmospheric chemistry and physics Vol. 16; no. 20; pp. 12983 - 12992
• Main Authors: Donner, Leo J., O'Brien, Travis A., Rieger, Daniel, Vogel, Bernhard, Cooke, William F.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Katlenburg-Lindau Copernicus GmbH 20.10.2016; Copernicus Publications, EGU; Copernicus Publications
• Subjects: Aerosol-cloud interactions; Atmospheric aerosols; Atmospheric models; Climate change; Climate models; Climate prediction; Climate sensitivity; Climate studies; Cloud models; Clouds; Convection; Emissions; Entrainment; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; Fluxes; General circulation models; Greenhouse gases; Ice; Numerical weather forecasting; Parameterization; Precipitation; Precipitation processes; Realism; Sensitivity; Uncertainty; Updraft; Velocity; Vertical distribution; Vertical velocities; Weather; Weather forecasting; United States > US; New Jersey
• ISSN: 1680-7324; 1680-7316; 1680-7324
• DOI: 10.5194/acp-16-12983-2016

Both climate forcing and climate sensitivity persist as stubborn uncertainties limiting the extent to which climate models can provide actionable scientific scenarios for climate change. A key, explicit control on cloud–aerosol interactions, the largest uncertainty in climate forcing, is the vertical velocity of cloud-scale updrafts. Model-based studies of climate sensitivity indicate that convective entrainment, which is closely related to updraft speeds, is an important control on climate sensitivity. Updraft vertical velocities also drive many physical processes essential to numerical weather prediction.Vertical velocities and their role in atmospheric physical processes have been given very limited attention in models for climate and numerical weather prediction. The relevant physical scales range down to tens of meters and are thus frequently sub-grid and require parameterization. Many state-of-science convection parameterizations provide mass fluxes without specifying vertical velocities, and parameterizations that do provide vertical velocities have been subject to limited evaluation against what have until recently been scant observations. Atmospheric observations imply that the distribution of vertical velocities depends on the areas over which the vertical velocities are averaged. Distributions of vertical velocities in climate models may capture this behavior, but it has not been accounted for when parameterizing cloud and precipitation processes in current models.New observations of convective vertical velocities offer a potentially promising path toward developing process-level cloud models and parameterizations for climate and numerical weather prediction. Taking account of the scale dependence of resolved vertical velocities offers a path to matching cloud-scale physical processes and their driving dynamics more realistically, with a prospect of reduced uncertainty in both climate forcing and sensitivity.