Investigating the challenges and generalizability of deep learning brain conductivity mapping

To investigate deep learning electrical properties tomography (EPT) for application on different simulated and in-vivo datasets, including pathologies for brain conductivity reconstructions, 3D patch-based convolutional neural networks were trained to predict conductivity maps from B1 transceive pha...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPhysics in medicine & biology Vol. 65; no. 13; pp. 135001 - 135010
Main Authors Hampe, Nils, Katscher, Ulrich, van den Berg, Cornelis A T, Tha, Khin Khin, Mandija, Stefano
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England IOP Publishing 26.06.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0031-9155
1361-6560
1361-6560
DOI10.1088/1361-6560/ab9356

Cover

Abstract To investigate deep learning electrical properties tomography (EPT) for application on different simulated and in-vivo datasets, including pathologies for brain conductivity reconstructions, 3D patch-based convolutional neural networks were trained to predict conductivity maps from B1 transceive phase data. To compare the performance of DL-EPT networks on different datasets, three datasets were used throughout this work, one from simulations and two from in-vivo measurements from healthy volunteers and patients with brain lesions, respectively. At first, networks trained on simulations were tested on all datasets with different levels of homogeneous Gaussian noise introduced in training and testing. Secondly, to investigate potential robustness towards systematical differences between simulated and measured phase maps, in-vivo data with conductivity labels from conventional EPT were used for training. High quality conductivity reconstructions from networks trained on simulations with and without noise confirm the potential of deep learning for EPT. However, when this network is used for in-vivo reconstructions, measurement related artifacts affect the quality of conductivity maps. Training DL-EPT networks using conductivity labels from conventional EPT improves the quality of the results. Networks trained on realistic simulations yield reconstruction artifacts when applied to in-vivo data. Training with realistic phase data and conductivity labels from conventional EPT allows for reducing these artifacts.
AbstractList To investigate deep learning electrical properties tomography (EPT) for application on different simulated and in-vivo datasets, including pathologies for brain conductivity reconstructions, 3D patch-based convolutional neural networks were trained to predict conductivity maps from B1 transceive phase data. To compare the performance of DL-EPT networks on different datasets, three datasets were used throughout this work, one from simulations and two from in-vivo measurements from healthy volunteers and patients with brain lesions, respectively. At first, networks trained on simulations were tested on all datasets with different levels of homogeneous Gaussian noise introduced in training and testing. Secondly, to investigate potential robustness towards systematical differences between simulated and measured phase maps, in-vivo data with conductivity labels from conventional EPT were used for training. High quality conductivity reconstructions from networks trained on simulations with and without noise confirm the potential of deep learning for EPT. However, when this network is used for in-vivo reconstructions, measurement related artifacts affect the quality of conductivity maps. Training DL-EPT networks using conductivity labels from conventional EPT improves the quality of the results. Networks trained on realistic simulations yield reconstruction artifacts when applied to in-vivo data. Training with realistic phase data and conductivity labels from conventional EPT allows for reducing these artifacts.
To investigate deep learning electrical properties tomography (EPT) for application on different simulated and in-vivo datasets, including pathologies for brain conductivity reconstructions, 3D patch-based convolutional neural networks were trained to predict conductivity maps from B 1 transceive phase data. To compare the performance of DL-EPT networks on different datasets, three datasets were used throughout this work, one from simulations and two from in-vivo measurements from healthy volunteers and patients with brain lesions, respectively. At first, networks trained on simulations were tested on all datasets with different levels of homogeneous Gaussian noise introduced in training and testing. Secondly, to investigate potential robustness towards systematical differences between simulated and measured phase maps, in-vivo data with conductivity labels from conventional EPT were used for training. High quality conductivity reconstructions from networks trained on simulations with and without noise confirm the potential of deep learning for EPT. However, when this network is used for in-vivo reconstructions, measurement related artifacts affect the quality of conductivity maps. Training DL-EPT networks using conductivity labels from conventional EPT improves the quality of the results. Networks trained on realistic simulations yield reconstruction artifacts when applied to in-vivo data. Training with realistic phase data and conductivity labels from conventional EPT allows for reducing these artifacts.To investigate deep learning electrical properties tomography (EPT) for application on different simulated and in-vivo datasets, including pathologies for brain conductivity reconstructions, 3D patch-based convolutional neural networks were trained to predict conductivity maps from B 1 transceive phase data. To compare the performance of DL-EPT networks on different datasets, three datasets were used throughout this work, one from simulations and two from in-vivo measurements from healthy volunteers and patients with brain lesions, respectively. At first, networks trained on simulations were tested on all datasets with different levels of homogeneous Gaussian noise introduced in training and testing. Secondly, to investigate potential robustness towards systematical differences between simulated and measured phase maps, in-vivo data with conductivity labels from conventional EPT were used for training. High quality conductivity reconstructions from networks trained on simulations with and without noise confirm the potential of deep learning for EPT. However, when this network is used for in-vivo reconstructions, measurement related artifacts affect the quality of conductivity maps. Training DL-EPT networks using conductivity labels from conventional EPT improves the quality of the results. Networks trained on realistic simulations yield reconstruction artifacts when applied to in-vivo data. Training with realistic phase data and conductivity labels from conventional EPT allows for reducing these artifacts.
To investigate deep learning electrical properties tomography (EPT) for application on different simulated and in-vivo datasets including pathologies for brain conductivity reconstructions. 3D patch-based convolutional neural networks were trained to predict conductivity maps from B1 transceive phase data. To compare the performance of DL-EPT networks on different datasets, three datasets were used throughout this work, one from simulations and two from in-vivo measurements from healthy volunteers and cancer patients, respectively. At first, networks trained on simulations were tested on all datasets with different levels of homogeneous Gaussian noise introduced in training and testing. Secondly, to investigate potential robustness towards systematical differences between simulated and measured phase maps, in-vivo data with conductivity labels from conventional EPT were used for training. High quality conductivity reconstructions from networks trained on simulations with and without noise confirms the potential of deep learning for EPT. However, when this network is used for in-vivo reconstructions, measurement related artifacts affect the quality of conductivity maps. Training DL-EPT networks using conductivity labels from conventional EPT improves the quality of the results. Networks trained on realistic simulations yield reconstruction artifacts when applied to in-vivo data. Training with realistic phase data and conductivity labels from conventional EPT allows for reducing these artifacts.
Author Hampe, Nils
Tha, Khin Khin
Katscher, Ulrich
Mandija, Stefano
van den Berg, Cornelis A T
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Nils
  orcidid: 0000-0002-2554-5176
  surname: Hampe
  fullname: Hampe, Nils
  email: n.hampe@amsterdamumc.nl
  organization: Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Ulrich
  surname: Katscher
  fullname: Katscher, Ulrich
  organization: Philips Research Hamburg , Roentgenstrasse 24, Hamburg, DE 22335, Germany
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Cornelis A T
  surname: van den Berg
  fullname: van den Berg, Cornelis A T
  organization: University Medical Centre Utrecht , Imaging Division, Department of Radiotherapy, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht 3584CX, The Netherlands
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Khin Khin
  orcidid: 0000-0002-9072-4509
  surname: Tha
  fullname: Tha, Khin Khin
  organization: Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine Global Center for Biomedical Science and Engineering, Kita15, Nishi7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, JP, 060-8638, Japan
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Stefano
  orcidid: 0000-0002-4612-5509
  surname: Mandija
  fullname: Mandija, Stefano
  organization: University Medical Centre Utrecht , Imaging Division, Department of Radiotherapy, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht 3584CX, The Netherlands
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32408291$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kUtLxDAURoMoOj72rqRLF9ZJ2iZNlyI-BgQ3upSQpjdjJE1q0gr6600ZdSEiuRByc77APdlH2847QOiY4HOCOV-SkpGcUYaXsm1KyrbQ4qe1jRYYlyRvCKV7aD_GF4wJ4UW1i_bKosK8aMgCPa3cG8TRrOVo3DobnyFTz9JacGuImXRdtgYHQVrzIVtjzfieeZ11AENmQQY3h9ogjcuUd92kRvM2M70chnR1iHa0tBGOvvYD9Hh99XB5m9_d36wuL-5yVZV0zKFRmtcN4LpuqS601Jywlqm6kMBoVXNeVgxrXDHFqxbXPB06KKCZU6yA8gCdbt4dgn-d0jyiN1GBtdKBn6JI46bVYMoSevKFTm0PnRiC6WV4F99KEoA3gAo-xgD6ByFYzNbFrFjMisXGeoqwXxFlxiTUuzGpsf8FzzZB4wfx4qfgkqX_8NM_8KFvE5XoVDT9sRg6XX4CVbChhA
CODEN PHMBA7
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1063_5_0077483
crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6560_ac7b64
crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics11020176
crossref_primary_10_1109_TMI_2024_3391651
crossref_primary_10_3390_bioengineering11070699
crossref_primary_10_1002_hbm_26421
crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics12112627
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2025_121054
crossref_primary_10_3390_s22228695
crossref_primary_10_1115_1_4064746
crossref_primary_10_1002_mrm_30338
crossref_primary_10_1109_TEMC_2022_3212860
crossref_primary_10_1109_TGRS_2024_3469238
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13246_023_01248_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_measurement_2020_108608
crossref_primary_10_1109_OJEMB_2024_3402998
crossref_primary_10_1109_TIP_2022_3172220
crossref_primary_10_1002_mrm_28826
crossref_primary_10_1109_JMMCT_2023_3345798
crossref_primary_10_3390_app10217910
Cites_doi 10.1002/nbm.3522
10.1002/mrm.22357
10.1088/0031-9155/55/2/N01
10.1002/mrm.27401
10.1109/3DV.2016.79
10.1038/s41598-019-45382-x
10.1007/s00330-017-4942-5
10.1007/978-3-319-46723-8_49
10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28
10.1109/TBME.2017.2725140
10.1002/mrm.26977
10.1002/nbm.3729
10.1002/nbm.4211
10.1002/jmri.24803
10.1002/mrm.24158
10.1002/mrm.21120
10.1109/TMI.2015.2427236
10.1002/9781118633953
10.1109/CVPR.2017.632
10.3109/02656736.2015.1129440
10.1002/mrm.27004
10.1109/TMI.2015.2404944
10.1038/nature25988
10.1038/nature14539
10.1109/TMI.2018.2816125
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2020 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine
2020 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2020 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine
– notice: 2020 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1088/1361-6560/ab9356
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Biology
Physics
DocumentTitleAlternate Investigating the challenges and generalizability of deep learning brain conductivity mapping
EISSN 1361-6560
ExternalDocumentID 32408291
10_1088_1361_6560_ab9356
pmbab9356
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
-DZ
-~X
123
1JI
4.4
5B3
5RE
5VS
5ZH
7.M
7.Q
AAGCD
AAJIO
AAJKP
AATNI
ABCXL
ABHWH
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABQJV
ABVAM
ACAFW
ACGFS
ACHIP
AEFHF
AENEX
AFYNE
AKPSB
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOAED
ASPBG
ATQHT
AVWKF
AZFZN
CBCFC
CEBXE
CJUJL
CRLBU
CS3
DU5
EBS
EDWGO
EJD
EMSAF
EPQRW
EQZZN
F5P
HAK
IHE
IJHAN
IOP
IZVLO
KOT
LAP
M45
N5L
N9A
P2P
PJBAE
R4D
RIN
RNS
RO9
ROL
RPA
SY9
TN5
UCJ
W28
XPP
AAYXX
ADEQX
AEINN
CITATION
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-e9cf879e077b5f2faf816b6c72ae6547883460f046c84b07860fde2e9f87962e3
IEDL.DBID IOP
ISSN 0031-9155
1361-6560
IngestDate Tue Aug 05 09:43:19 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 22:58:35 EST 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:55:08 EDT 2025
Wed Oct 01 00:30:38 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 07 15:20:51 EST 2021
Wed Aug 21 03:34:40 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 13
Keywords EPT
deep learning
brain tissue conductivity
MRI
electrical properties tomography
electromagnetic field simulations
Language English
License 2020 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c435t-e9cf879e077b5f2faf816b6c72ae6547883460f046c84b07860fde2e9f87962e3
Notes PMB-109758.R2
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-2554-5176
0000-0002-4612-5509
0000-0002-9072-4509
PMID 32408291
PQID 2404049056
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs crossref_citationtrail_10_1088_1361_6560_ab9356
pubmed_primary_32408291
crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6560_ab9356
iop_journals_10_1088_1361_6560_ab9356
proquest_miscellaneous_2404049056
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20200626
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-06-26
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2020
  text: 20200626
  day: 26
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
PublicationTitle Physics in medicine & biology
PublicationTitleAbbrev PMB
PublicationTitleAlternate Phys. Med. Biol
PublicationYear 2020
Publisher IOP Publishing
Publisher_xml – name: IOP Publishing
References 22
23
24
26
27
28
Katscher U (11) 2018; 26
10
Christ A (3) 2010; 55
12
13
14
15
Hyun C M (9) 2018; 63
16
17
18
19
1
2
4
5
Stehning C (25) 2011; 19
6
7
8
20
21
References_xml – ident: 5
  doi: 10.1002/nbm.3522
– ident: 23
  doi: 10.1002/mrm.22357
– volume: 55
  start-page: N23
  issn: 0031-9155
  year: 2010
  ident: 3
  publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol.
  doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/2/N01
– ident: 8
  doi: 10.1002/mrm.27401
– volume: 19
  start-page: 128
  year: 2011
  ident: 25
  publication-title: Proc. ISMRM 19th Ann. Meet. (Montréal, Canada, 7-13 May 2011)
– ident: 20
  doi: 10.1109/3DV.2016.79
– ident: 18
  doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45382-x
– volume: 63
  issn: 0031-9155
  year: 2018
  ident: 9
  publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol.
– ident: 26
  doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4942-5
– ident: 4
  doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-46723-8_49
– ident: 22
  doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28
– volume: 26
  start-page: 0546
  year: 2018
  ident: 11
  publication-title: Proc. Joint Ann. Meet. ISMRM-ESMRMB 2018 (Paris, France, 16-21 June 2018) ISMRM
– ident: 17
  doi: 10.1109/TBME.2017.2725140
– ident: 7
  doi: 10.1002/mrm.26977
– ident: 12
  doi: 10.1002/nbm.3729
– ident: 16
  doi: 10.1002/nbm.4211
– ident: 24
  doi: 10.1002/jmri.24803
– ident: 21
  doi: 10.1002/mrm.24158
– ident: 27
  doi: 10.1002/mrm.21120
– ident: 14
  doi: 10.1109/TMI.2015.2427236
– ident: 6
  doi: 10.1002/9781118633953
– ident: 10
  doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2017.632
– ident: 1
  doi: 10.3109/02656736.2015.1129440
– ident: 19
  doi: 10.1002/mrm.27004
– ident: 2
  doi: 10.1109/TMI.2015.2404944
– ident: 28
  doi: 10.1038/nature25988
– ident: 13
  doi: 10.1038/nature14539
– ident: 15
  doi: 10.1109/TMI.2018.2816125
SSID ssj0011824
Score 2.4362895
Snippet To investigate deep learning electrical properties tomography (EPT) for application on different simulated and in-vivo datasets, including pathologies for...
To investigate deep learning electrical properties tomography (EPT) for application on different simulated and in-vivo datasets including pathologies for brain...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
iop
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 135001
SubjectTerms brain tissue conductivity
deep learning
electrical properties tomography
electromagnetic field simulations
EPT
MRI
Title Investigating the challenges and generalizability of deep learning brain conductivity mapping
URI https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6560/ab9356
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32408291
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2404049056
Volume 65
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVIOP
  databaseName: IOP Science Platform
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1361-6560
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0011824
  issn: 0031-9155
  databaseCode: IOP
  dateStart: 19560101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://iopscience.iop.org/
  providerName: IOP Publishing
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwEB61RSAuFMqrFJCRyoFDdtd24jjihBBVhVTaQyv1UGTZjr0HaDZidw_l1zMTe1cUlQoh5ZDHxHHGdjyTGX8fwH7tuPXWVoWgJT5lFe3wo6kQvPVS8FCHgYfs6Is6PCs_n1fnG_B-vRZm1udP_wh3E1BwUmFOiNNjLhUvCDNmbF0jK7UJd6RGv4JW7x2frEMIaDgnCGbJCwJBzzHKm0q4Nidt4nP_bm4O087BNlysKpyyTb6Nlgs38j__wHL8zzd6CA-yOco-JNFHsBG6HbibCCqvduDeUQ6948khV9TPH8PX37A5uilDC5L5FSXLnNmuZdOEZU0JY5R6e8VmkbUh9CxzVEyZI2YKhr44wc0O_BXs0hJUxPQJnB18Ov14WGSWhsKjqbUoQuOjrpswqWtXRRFt1Fw55WthAzEbay1LNYnoh3tdOrRI8KANIjR0lxJBPoWtbtaF58BqybmNtax8GUtFMDyubbgMrWtFiFHvwnjVTsZnCHNi0vhuhlC61oY0aUiTJmlyF96t7-gTfMctsm-xgUwew_Nb5N5ck-svHV5GMdwq7HimbyPKrDqQwfFKQRjbhdlybtCCKinaSuU8Sz1rXTMCR9Si4S_-sSZ7cF-Q-z_BsaVewtbixzK8Qhtp4V4PY-EXBM8GHA
linkProvider IOP Publishing
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3NbxQhFCe2xsZL1Wpt_cREDx5md4GBYY5NddOqrT3YpBeDwMAetLOT7u6h_et9b2A31mhjYjKH-XgwzAOGB-_x-xHyunLMemtlwXGLTymj7ReaCs4aLzgLVeh5yI6O1cFp-eFMnmWe034vzLTLv_4BnCag4KTCHBCnh0woViBmzNC6Wkg17Jq4Rm5LISvkbjj8fLJyI4DxnGCYBSsQCD37Kf-Uy7VxaQ3e_XeTsx96xvfIt2WhU8TJ98Fi7gb-6jc8x__4qvtkM5uldC-JPyC3QrtF7iSiysstsnGUXfBws48Z9bOH5OsvGB3thIIlSf2SmmVGbdvQScK0xsAxDMG9pNNImxA6mrkqJtQhQwWFOTnCzvY8FvTcImTE5BE5Hb__sn9QZLaGwoPJNS9C7aOu6jCqKicjjzZqppzyFbcBGY61FqUaRZiPe106sEzgogk81JhK8SC2yXo7bcMOoZVgzMZKSF_GUiEcj2tqJkLjGh5i1LtkuKwr4zOUOTJq_DC9S11rg9o0qE2TtLlL3q5SdAnG4wbZN1BJJvfl2Q1yr67JdecOHoMYHBIan4EaBJllIzLQb9EZY9swXcwMWFIlel0xn8epda1KhiCJmtfsyT-W5CXZOHk3Np8Ojz8-JXc5rgiMoLupZ2R9frEIz8FsmrsXfdf4CRKWC4Y
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigating+the+challenges+and+generalizability+of+deep+learning+brain+conductivity+mapping&rft.jtitle=Physics+in+medicine+%26+biology&rft.au=Hampe%2C+Nils&rft.au=Katscher%2C+Ulrich&rft.au=van+den+Berg%2C+Cornelis+A+T&rft.au=Tha%2C+Khin+Khin&rft.date=2020-06-26&rft.issn=1361-6560&rft.eissn=1361-6560&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=135001&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088%2F1361-6560%2Fab9356&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0031-9155&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0031-9155&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0031-9155&client=summon