Investigating the challenges and generalizability of deep learning brain conductivity mapping
To investigate deep learning electrical properties tomography (EPT) for application on different simulated and in-vivo datasets, including pathologies for brain conductivity reconstructions, 3D patch-based convolutional neural networks were trained to predict conductivity maps from B1 transceive pha...
Saved in:
Published in | Physics in medicine & biology Vol. 65; no. 13; pp. 135001 - 135010 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
IOP Publishing
26.06.2020
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0031-9155 1361-6560 1361-6560 |
DOI | 10.1088/1361-6560/ab9356 |
Cover
Abstract | To investigate deep learning electrical properties tomography (EPT) for application on different simulated and in-vivo datasets, including pathologies for brain conductivity reconstructions, 3D patch-based convolutional neural networks were trained to predict conductivity maps from B1 transceive phase data. To compare the performance of DL-EPT networks on different datasets, three datasets were used throughout this work, one from simulations and two from in-vivo measurements from healthy volunteers and patients with brain lesions, respectively. At first, networks trained on simulations were tested on all datasets with different levels of homogeneous Gaussian noise introduced in training and testing. Secondly, to investigate potential robustness towards systematical differences between simulated and measured phase maps, in-vivo data with conductivity labels from conventional EPT were used for training. High quality conductivity reconstructions from networks trained on simulations with and without noise confirm the potential of deep learning for EPT. However, when this network is used for in-vivo reconstructions, measurement related artifacts affect the quality of conductivity maps. Training DL-EPT networks using conductivity labels from conventional EPT improves the quality of the results. Networks trained on realistic simulations yield reconstruction artifacts when applied to in-vivo data. Training with realistic phase data and conductivity labels from conventional EPT allows for reducing these artifacts. |
---|---|
AbstractList | To investigate deep learning electrical properties tomography (EPT) for application on different simulated and in-vivo datasets, including pathologies for brain conductivity reconstructions, 3D patch-based convolutional neural networks were trained to predict conductivity maps from B1 transceive phase data. To compare the performance of DL-EPT networks on different datasets, three datasets were used throughout this work, one from simulations and two from in-vivo measurements from healthy volunteers and patients with brain lesions, respectively. At first, networks trained on simulations were tested on all datasets with different levels of homogeneous Gaussian noise introduced in training and testing. Secondly, to investigate potential robustness towards systematical differences between simulated and measured phase maps, in-vivo data with conductivity labels from conventional EPT were used for training. High quality conductivity reconstructions from networks trained on simulations with and without noise confirm the potential of deep learning for EPT. However, when this network is used for in-vivo reconstructions, measurement related artifacts affect the quality of conductivity maps. Training DL-EPT networks using conductivity labels from conventional EPT improves the quality of the results. Networks trained on realistic simulations yield reconstruction artifacts when applied to in-vivo data. Training with realistic phase data and conductivity labels from conventional EPT allows for reducing these artifacts. To investigate deep learning electrical properties tomography (EPT) for application on different simulated and in-vivo datasets, including pathologies for brain conductivity reconstructions, 3D patch-based convolutional neural networks were trained to predict conductivity maps from B 1 transceive phase data. To compare the performance of DL-EPT networks on different datasets, three datasets were used throughout this work, one from simulations and two from in-vivo measurements from healthy volunteers and patients with brain lesions, respectively. At first, networks trained on simulations were tested on all datasets with different levels of homogeneous Gaussian noise introduced in training and testing. Secondly, to investigate potential robustness towards systematical differences between simulated and measured phase maps, in-vivo data with conductivity labels from conventional EPT were used for training. High quality conductivity reconstructions from networks trained on simulations with and without noise confirm the potential of deep learning for EPT. However, when this network is used for in-vivo reconstructions, measurement related artifacts affect the quality of conductivity maps. Training DL-EPT networks using conductivity labels from conventional EPT improves the quality of the results. Networks trained on realistic simulations yield reconstruction artifacts when applied to in-vivo data. Training with realistic phase data and conductivity labels from conventional EPT allows for reducing these artifacts.To investigate deep learning electrical properties tomography (EPT) for application on different simulated and in-vivo datasets, including pathologies for brain conductivity reconstructions, 3D patch-based convolutional neural networks were trained to predict conductivity maps from B 1 transceive phase data. To compare the performance of DL-EPT networks on different datasets, three datasets were used throughout this work, one from simulations and two from in-vivo measurements from healthy volunteers and patients with brain lesions, respectively. At first, networks trained on simulations were tested on all datasets with different levels of homogeneous Gaussian noise introduced in training and testing. Secondly, to investigate potential robustness towards systematical differences between simulated and measured phase maps, in-vivo data with conductivity labels from conventional EPT were used for training. High quality conductivity reconstructions from networks trained on simulations with and without noise confirm the potential of deep learning for EPT. However, when this network is used for in-vivo reconstructions, measurement related artifacts affect the quality of conductivity maps. Training DL-EPT networks using conductivity labels from conventional EPT improves the quality of the results. Networks trained on realistic simulations yield reconstruction artifacts when applied to in-vivo data. Training with realistic phase data and conductivity labels from conventional EPT allows for reducing these artifacts. To investigate deep learning electrical properties tomography (EPT) for application on different simulated and in-vivo datasets including pathologies for brain conductivity reconstructions. 3D patch-based convolutional neural networks were trained to predict conductivity maps from B1 transceive phase data. To compare the performance of DL-EPT networks on different datasets, three datasets were used throughout this work, one from simulations and two from in-vivo measurements from healthy volunteers and cancer patients, respectively. At first, networks trained on simulations were tested on all datasets with different levels of homogeneous Gaussian noise introduced in training and testing. Secondly, to investigate potential robustness towards systematical differences between simulated and measured phase maps, in-vivo data with conductivity labels from conventional EPT were used for training. High quality conductivity reconstructions from networks trained on simulations with and without noise confirms the potential of deep learning for EPT. However, when this network is used for in-vivo reconstructions, measurement related artifacts affect the quality of conductivity maps. Training DL-EPT networks using conductivity labels from conventional EPT improves the quality of the results. Networks trained on realistic simulations yield reconstruction artifacts when applied to in-vivo data. Training with realistic phase data and conductivity labels from conventional EPT allows for reducing these artifacts. |
Author | Hampe, Nils Tha, Khin Khin Katscher, Ulrich Mandija, Stefano van den Berg, Cornelis A T |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Nils orcidid: 0000-0002-2554-5176 surname: Hampe fullname: Hampe, Nils email: n.hampe@amsterdamumc.nl organization: Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed – sequence: 2 givenname: Ulrich surname: Katscher fullname: Katscher, Ulrich organization: Philips Research Hamburg , Roentgenstrasse 24, Hamburg, DE 22335, Germany – sequence: 3 givenname: Cornelis A T surname: van den Berg fullname: van den Berg, Cornelis A T organization: University Medical Centre Utrecht , Imaging Division, Department of Radiotherapy, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht 3584CX, The Netherlands – sequence: 4 givenname: Khin Khin orcidid: 0000-0002-9072-4509 surname: Tha fullname: Tha, Khin Khin organization: Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine Global Center for Biomedical Science and Engineering, Kita15, Nishi7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, JP, 060-8638, Japan – sequence: 5 givenname: Stefano orcidid: 0000-0002-4612-5509 surname: Mandija fullname: Mandija, Stefano organization: University Medical Centre Utrecht , Imaging Division, Department of Radiotherapy, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht 3584CX, The Netherlands |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32408291$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kUtLxDAURoMoOj72rqRLF9ZJ2iZNlyI-BgQ3upSQpjdjJE1q0gr6600ZdSEiuRByc77APdlH2847QOiY4HOCOV-SkpGcUYaXsm1KyrbQ4qe1jRYYlyRvCKV7aD_GF4wJ4UW1i_bKosK8aMgCPa3cG8TRrOVo3DobnyFTz9JacGuImXRdtgYHQVrzIVtjzfieeZ11AENmQQY3h9ogjcuUd92kRvM2M70chnR1iHa0tBGOvvYD9Hh99XB5m9_d36wuL-5yVZV0zKFRmtcN4LpuqS601Jywlqm6kMBoVXNeVgxrXDHFqxbXPB06KKCZU6yA8gCdbt4dgn-d0jyiN1GBtdKBn6JI46bVYMoSevKFTm0PnRiC6WV4F99KEoA3gAo-xgD6ByFYzNbFrFjMisXGeoqwXxFlxiTUuzGpsf8FzzZB4wfx4qfgkqX_8NM_8KFvE5XoVDT9sRg6XX4CVbChhA |
CODEN | PHMBA7 |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1063_5_0077483 crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6560_ac7b64 crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics11020176 crossref_primary_10_1109_TMI_2024_3391651 crossref_primary_10_3390_bioengineering11070699 crossref_primary_10_1002_hbm_26421 crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics12112627 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2025_121054 crossref_primary_10_3390_s22228695 crossref_primary_10_1115_1_4064746 crossref_primary_10_1002_mrm_30338 crossref_primary_10_1109_TEMC_2022_3212860 crossref_primary_10_1109_TGRS_2024_3469238 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13246_023_01248_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_measurement_2020_108608 crossref_primary_10_1109_OJEMB_2024_3402998 crossref_primary_10_1109_TIP_2022_3172220 crossref_primary_10_1002_mrm_28826 crossref_primary_10_1109_JMMCT_2023_3345798 crossref_primary_10_3390_app10217910 |
Cites_doi | 10.1002/nbm.3522 10.1002/mrm.22357 10.1088/0031-9155/55/2/N01 10.1002/mrm.27401 10.1109/3DV.2016.79 10.1038/s41598-019-45382-x 10.1007/s00330-017-4942-5 10.1007/978-3-319-46723-8_49 10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 10.1109/TBME.2017.2725140 10.1002/mrm.26977 10.1002/nbm.3729 10.1002/nbm.4211 10.1002/jmri.24803 10.1002/mrm.24158 10.1002/mrm.21120 10.1109/TMI.2015.2427236 10.1002/9781118633953 10.1109/CVPR.2017.632 10.3109/02656736.2015.1129440 10.1002/mrm.27004 10.1109/TMI.2015.2404944 10.1038/nature25988 10.1038/nature14539 10.1109/TMI.2018.2816125 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2020 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine 2020 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2020 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine – notice: 2020 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1088/1361-6560/ab9356 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic PubMed |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Biology Physics |
DocumentTitleAlternate | Investigating the challenges and generalizability of deep learning brain conductivity mapping |
EISSN | 1361-6560 |
ExternalDocumentID | 32408291 10_1088_1361_6560_ab9356 pmbab9356 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- -DZ -~X 123 1JI 4.4 5B3 5RE 5VS 5ZH 7.M 7.Q AAGCD AAJIO AAJKP AATNI ABCXL ABHWH ABJNI ABLJU ABQJV ABVAM ACAFW ACGFS ACHIP AEFHF AENEX AFYNE AKPSB ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOAED ASPBG ATQHT AVWKF AZFZN CBCFC CEBXE CJUJL CRLBU CS3 DU5 EBS EDWGO EJD EMSAF EPQRW EQZZN F5P HAK IHE IJHAN IOP IZVLO KOT LAP M45 N5L N9A P2P PJBAE R4D RIN RNS RO9 ROL RPA SY9 TN5 UCJ W28 XPP AAYXX ADEQX AEINN CITATION NPM 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-e9cf879e077b5f2faf816b6c72ae6547883460f046c84b07860fde2e9f87962e3 |
IEDL.DBID | IOP |
ISSN | 0031-9155 1361-6560 |
IngestDate | Tue Aug 05 09:43:19 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 02 22:58:35 EST 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:55:08 EDT 2025 Wed Oct 01 00:30:38 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 07 15:20:51 EST 2021 Wed Aug 21 03:34:40 EDT 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 13 |
Keywords | EPT deep learning brain tissue conductivity MRI electrical properties tomography electromagnetic field simulations |
Language | English |
License | 2020 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c435t-e9cf879e077b5f2faf816b6c72ae6547883460f046c84b07860fde2e9f87962e3 |
Notes | PMB-109758.R2 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-2554-5176 0000-0002-4612-5509 0000-0002-9072-4509 |
PMID | 32408291 |
PQID | 2404049056 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 10 |
ParticipantIDs | crossref_citationtrail_10_1088_1361_6560_ab9356 pubmed_primary_32408291 crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6560_ab9356 iop_journals_10_1088_1361_6560_ab9356 proquest_miscellaneous_2404049056 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 20200626 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-06-26 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 2020 text: 20200626 day: 26 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England |
PublicationTitle | Physics in medicine & biology |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | PMB |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Phys. Med. Biol |
PublicationYear | 2020 |
Publisher | IOP Publishing |
Publisher_xml | – name: IOP Publishing |
References | 22 23 24 26 27 28 Katscher U (11) 2018; 26 10 Christ A (3) 2010; 55 12 13 14 15 Hyun C M (9) 2018; 63 16 17 18 19 1 2 4 5 Stehning C (25) 2011; 19 6 7 8 20 21 |
References_xml | – ident: 5 doi: 10.1002/nbm.3522 – ident: 23 doi: 10.1002/mrm.22357 – volume: 55 start-page: N23 issn: 0031-9155 year: 2010 ident: 3 publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/2/N01 – ident: 8 doi: 10.1002/mrm.27401 – volume: 19 start-page: 128 year: 2011 ident: 25 publication-title: Proc. ISMRM 19th Ann. Meet. (Montréal, Canada, 7-13 May 2011) – ident: 20 doi: 10.1109/3DV.2016.79 – ident: 18 doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45382-x – volume: 63 issn: 0031-9155 year: 2018 ident: 9 publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol. – ident: 26 doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4942-5 – ident: 4 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-46723-8_49 – ident: 22 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 – volume: 26 start-page: 0546 year: 2018 ident: 11 publication-title: Proc. Joint Ann. Meet. ISMRM-ESMRMB 2018 (Paris, France, 16-21 June 2018) ISMRM – ident: 17 doi: 10.1109/TBME.2017.2725140 – ident: 7 doi: 10.1002/mrm.26977 – ident: 12 doi: 10.1002/nbm.3729 – ident: 16 doi: 10.1002/nbm.4211 – ident: 24 doi: 10.1002/jmri.24803 – ident: 21 doi: 10.1002/mrm.24158 – ident: 27 doi: 10.1002/mrm.21120 – ident: 14 doi: 10.1109/TMI.2015.2427236 – ident: 6 doi: 10.1002/9781118633953 – ident: 10 doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2017.632 – ident: 1 doi: 10.3109/02656736.2015.1129440 – ident: 19 doi: 10.1002/mrm.27004 – ident: 2 doi: 10.1109/TMI.2015.2404944 – ident: 28 doi: 10.1038/nature25988 – ident: 13 doi: 10.1038/nature14539 – ident: 15 doi: 10.1109/TMI.2018.2816125 |
SSID | ssj0011824 |
Score | 2.4362895 |
Snippet | To investigate deep learning electrical properties tomography (EPT) for application on different simulated and in-vivo datasets, including pathologies for... To investigate deep learning electrical properties tomography (EPT) for application on different simulated and in-vivo datasets including pathologies for brain... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref iop |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 135001 |
SubjectTerms | brain tissue conductivity deep learning electrical properties tomography electromagnetic field simulations EPT MRI |
Title | Investigating the challenges and generalizability of deep learning brain conductivity mapping |
URI | https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6560/ab9356 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32408291 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2404049056 |
Volume | 65 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVIOP databaseName: IOP Science Platform customDbUrl: eissn: 1361-6560 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0011824 issn: 0031-9155 databaseCode: IOP dateStart: 19560101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://iopscience.iop.org/ providerName: IOP Publishing |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwEB61RSAuFMqrFJCRyoFDdtd24jjihBBVhVTaQyv1UGTZjr0HaDZidw_l1zMTe1cUlQoh5ZDHxHHGdjyTGX8fwH7tuPXWVoWgJT5lFe3wo6kQvPVS8FCHgYfs6Is6PCs_n1fnG_B-vRZm1udP_wh3E1BwUmFOiNNjLhUvCDNmbF0jK7UJd6RGv4JW7x2frEMIaDgnCGbJCwJBzzHKm0q4Nidt4nP_bm4O087BNlysKpyyTb6Nlgs38j__wHL8zzd6CA-yOco-JNFHsBG6HbibCCqvduDeUQ6948khV9TPH8PX37A5uilDC5L5FSXLnNmuZdOEZU0JY5R6e8VmkbUh9CxzVEyZI2YKhr44wc0O_BXs0hJUxPQJnB18Ov14WGSWhsKjqbUoQuOjrpswqWtXRRFt1Fw55WthAzEbay1LNYnoh3tdOrRI8KANIjR0lxJBPoWtbtaF58BqybmNtax8GUtFMDyubbgMrWtFiFHvwnjVTsZnCHNi0vhuhlC61oY0aUiTJmlyF96t7-gTfMctsm-xgUwew_Nb5N5ck-svHV5GMdwq7HimbyPKrDqQwfFKQRjbhdlybtCCKinaSuU8Sz1rXTMCR9Si4S_-sSZ7cF-Q-z_BsaVewtbixzK8Qhtp4V4PY-EXBM8GHA |
linkProvider | IOP Publishing |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3NbxQhFCe2xsZL1Wpt_cREDx5md4GBYY5NddOqrT3YpBeDwMAetLOT7u6h_et9b2A31mhjYjKH-XgwzAOGB-_x-xHyunLMemtlwXGLTymj7ReaCs4aLzgLVeh5yI6O1cFp-eFMnmWe034vzLTLv_4BnCag4KTCHBCnh0woViBmzNC6Wkg17Jq4Rm5LISvkbjj8fLJyI4DxnGCYBSsQCD37Kf-Uy7VxaQ3e_XeTsx96xvfIt2WhU8TJ98Fi7gb-6jc8x__4qvtkM5uldC-JPyC3QrtF7iSiysstsnGUXfBws48Z9bOH5OsvGB3thIIlSf2SmmVGbdvQScK0xsAxDMG9pNNImxA6mrkqJtQhQwWFOTnCzvY8FvTcImTE5BE5Hb__sn9QZLaGwoPJNS9C7aOu6jCqKicjjzZqppzyFbcBGY61FqUaRZiPe106sEzgogk81JhK8SC2yXo7bcMOoZVgzMZKSF_GUiEcj2tqJkLjGh5i1LtkuKwr4zOUOTJq_DC9S11rg9o0qE2TtLlL3q5SdAnG4wbZN1BJJvfl2Q1yr67JdecOHoMYHBIan4EaBJllIzLQb9EZY9swXcwMWFIlel0xn8epda1KhiCJmtfsyT-W5CXZOHk3Np8Ojz8-JXc5rgiMoLupZ2R9frEIz8FsmrsXfdf4CRKWC4Y |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigating+the+challenges+and+generalizability+of+deep+learning+brain+conductivity+mapping&rft.jtitle=Physics+in+medicine+%26+biology&rft.au=Hampe%2C+Nils&rft.au=Katscher%2C+Ulrich&rft.au=van+den+Berg%2C+Cornelis+A+T&rft.au=Tha%2C+Khin+Khin&rft.date=2020-06-26&rft.issn=1361-6560&rft.eissn=1361-6560&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=135001&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088%2F1361-6560%2Fab9356&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0031-9155&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0031-9155&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0031-9155&client=summon |