Evaluation of an Enhanced Peer Mentoring Program on Scholarly Productivity and Promotion in Academic Emergency Medicine: A Five-Year Review

• Published in: Journal of the National Medical Association Vol. 111; no. 6; pp. 600 - 605
• Main Authors: Prendergast, Heather M., Heinert, Sara W., Erickson, Timothy B., Thompson, Trevonne M., Vanden Hoek, Terry L.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.12.2019; Elsevier Limited
• Subjects: Academic; Academic Medical Centers; Administrative support; Advisors; Career Mobility; Careers; Chicago; Collaboration; Compensation plans; Design; Education; Efficiency, Organizational - trends; Emergency medical care; Emergency Medicine; Faculty, Medical; Female; Funding; Grants; Humans; Identification; Male; Medicine; Meetings; Mentoring; Mentors; Peer Group; Peer mentoring; Polls & surveys; Productivity; Program Evaluation; Promotion; Research Support as Topic - trends; Scholarship; Tenure; Work life balance; Chicago; Academic; Peer mentoring; Promotion; Scholarship
• ISSN: 0027-9684; 1943-4693; 1943-4693
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jnma.2019.07.001

To design, implement, and evaluate the effectiveness of an enhanced peer mentoring program (EPMP) for faculty in emergency medicine aimed at overcoming traditional mentoring challenges. Full time faculty (Clinical Instructor, Assistant, and Associate levels) were placed into peer groups (based upon their primary academic roles) led by senior faculty advisors at the Professor level. Peer groups met at least quarterly from 2012 to 2017. In lieu of a structured curriculum, session topics were informed by individual faculty surveys and peer group consensus. Areas of focus included work-life balance, prioritizing academic commitments, identification of mentors (both within and external to the department and university), networking opportunities, promotions goals, and career satisfaction. Effectiveness of the EPMP was evaluated by academic productivity and advancement over a 5- year period. A total of 22 faculty members participated in the program. There was an increase in promotions to the next academic level, from 3 promotions in the five years before the program to 7 promotions in the five years of the program. Total grant funding increased 3-fold from $500,000 to $1,706,479 from the first year to the last year of the evaluation period. This enhanced peer mentoring program was effective in mitigating many of the traditional mentoring challenges faced by faculty in academia and was successful in improving both academic productivity and advancement.