Reconsidering the Word–Sacrament and Scripture–Liturgy Debate: A Patristic Perspective

• Published in: Religions (Basel, Switzerland ) Vol. 16; no. 7; p. 895
• Main Author: Streza, Ciprian Ioan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.07.2025
• Subjects: Analysis; Bible; Christianity; Church fathers; Communication (Theology); Criticism and interpretation; Ethics; Fathers of the church; Holy Spirit; Liturgics; Liturgy; Methods; orthodoxy; Protestant Reformation; Religious orthodoxy; Rites & ceremonies; Sacraments; Sacred books; Spirituality; Theology; tradition; Traditions; Europe
• ISSN: 2077-1444; 2077-1444
• DOI: 10.3390/rel16070895

The relationship between Scripture and the Liturgy remains one of the most extensively debated subjects in theological discourse. In the wake of the Protestant Reformation and the Catholic Counter-Reformation, a divided Christendom witnessed the rise of a dichotomy between Scripture and Liturgy, as well as between the Word and the Sacrament. This dichotomy, however, is absent from the patristic thought, which perceives the unity and complementarity between Scripture and Liturgy, owing to their shared belonging to the one life of the Church—broadly defined as Tradition—and to the way they are understood and experienced as interconnected modes through which the singular Mystery of Jesus Christ is communicated to the faithful. The present study aims to demonstrate this unity by drawing on a substantial body of patristic writings, highlighting the fact that the life of the Church is one and is lived both as the rule of faith and the rule of prayer, and that through it, one and the same Christ communicates Himself to the faithful both through the Word and through the Holy Sacraments. For the Church Fathers, the Christian faith is not an abstract doctrine about Christ, but a real and personal encounter and communion with Him in the life of the Church. This patristic approach may offer a starting point for contemporary Christianity in addressing the current liturgical crisis and in rethinking and renewing future ecumenical dialogue. Such renewal presupposes a movement beyond secular formalism and nominalism, which have fostered excessive conceptualization and an antithetical view of Scripture and Liturgy, Word and Sacrament.