A two-stage robust approach for the reliable logistics network design problem

•Three two-stage robust models for the reliable logistics network design problem.•Performance tests show superiority of the proposed exact algorithm.•System’s reliability can be improved with a slight increase in the normal cost.•The expanded model can better balance cost, risk, and computational ti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTransportation research. Part B: methodological Vol. 111; pp. 185 - 202
Main Authors Cheng, Chun, Qi, Mingyao, Zhang, Ying, Rousseau, Louis-Martin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01.05.2018
Elsevier Science Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0191-2615
1879-2367
DOI10.1016/j.trb.2018.03.015

Cover

More Information
Summary:•Three two-stage robust models for the reliable logistics network design problem.•Performance tests show superiority of the proposed exact algorithm.•System’s reliability can be improved with a slight increase in the normal cost.•The expanded model can better balance cost, risk, and computational time.•The risk-constrained model can be a decision support tool for system expansion. This paper examines a three-echelon logistics network in which all supply and transshipment nodes are subject to disruption. We use uncertainty sets to describe the possible scenarios without depending on probabilistic information. We adopt a two-stage robust optimization approach where location decisions are made before and recourse decisions are made after the disruptions are known. We construct three two-stage robust models, which are solved exactly by a column-and-constraint-generation algorithm. Numerical tests demonstrate that the proposed algorithm outperforms the Benders decomposition method in both solution quality and computational time, and that the system’s reliability can be improved with only a slight increase in the normal cost.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0191-2615
1879-2367
DOI:10.1016/j.trb.2018.03.015