Generalized Confidence Intervals for Intra- and Inter-subject Coefficients of Variation in Linear Mixed-effects Models

Linear mixed-effects models are linear models with several variance components. Models with a single random-effects factor have two variance components: the random-effects variance, i. e., the inter-subject variance, and the residual error variance, i. e., the intra-subject variance. In many applica...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe international journal of biostatistics Vol. 13; no. 2; pp. 445 - 458
Main Author Forkman, Johannes
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Germany De Gruyter 27.11.2017
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1557-4679
2194-573X
1557-4679
DOI10.1515/ijb-2016-0093

Cover

More Information
Summary:Linear mixed-effects models are linear models with several variance components. Models with a single random-effects factor have two variance components: the random-effects variance, i. e., the inter-subject variance, and the residual error variance, i. e., the intra-subject variance. In many applications, it is practice to report variance components as coefficients of variation. The intra- and inter-subject coefficients of variation are the square roots of the corresponding variances divided by the mean. This article proposes methods for computing confidence intervals for intra- and inter-subject coefficients of variation using generalized pivotal quantities. The methods are illustrated through two examples. In the first example, precision is assessed within and between runs in a bioanalytical method validation. In the second example, variation is estimated within and between main plots in an agricultural split-plot experiment. Coverage of generalized confidence intervals is investigated through simulation and shown to be close to the nominal value.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1557-4679
2194-573X
1557-4679
DOI:10.1515/ijb-2016-0093