The insufficiency of a simple stress question in assessing stress for chronic daily headache in clinical practice

In managing chronic daily headaches (CDH), a comprehensive approach is necessary to evaluate stress, a closely linked factor. However, limited time and costs often lead to the use of a simple stress question in clinical settings. This study aims to assess the validity of using a simple stress questi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical neurology and neurosurgery Vol. 233; p. 107944
Main Authors Lee, Sung-Hyun, Shin, Dong-Ick, Lee, Sang-Soo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Assen Elsevier B.V 01.10.2023
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0303-8467
1872-6968
1872-6968
DOI10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107944

Cover

Abstract In managing chronic daily headaches (CDH), a comprehensive approach is necessary to evaluate stress, a closely linked factor. However, limited time and costs often lead to the use of a simple stress question in clinical settings. This study aims to assess the validity of using a simple stress question for CDH patients and explore its implications for clinical practice. We recruited 103 patients with CDH who completed structured self-administered questionnaires, including a simple stress question ("Have you had any stress or concerns in the last 4 weeks?") and validated Korean versions of questionnaires for depression, anxiety, insomnia, and the Brief Encounter Psychosocial Instrument (BEPSI). A headache specialist conducted clinical interviews. The stress group consisted of patients who acknowledged overt stress (answering "yes" to the simple question) and covert stress (initially answering "no" but later admitting during the interview). Results showed no statistical difference between the subgroups, so they were combined as the "acknowledged stress" group. Out of 103 patients, 54.4% had chronic migraine, 45.6% had chronic tension-type headache, and 66 patients (64.1%) acknowledged experiencing stress. No significant differences were found in demographic and clinical characteristics, BEPSI stress assessment, or depression, anxiety, and insomnia profiles between patients with overt stress (n = 51) and covert stress (n = 15). The average BEPSI score was 2.3 ± 0.9, with 45.6% of patients exceeding the criteria (>2.4). Two (5.4%) patients in denial of stress had scores above the BEPSI criteria. Among patients below the criteria of BEPSI, 21 acknowledged stress, while 35 denied stress, with no significant differences observed. This study suggests the limitations of relying solely on a simple stress question for assessing stress in patients with CDH in clinical practice. It is possible to encounter covert stress, include individuals who do not exhibit noticeable stress, and misclassify stress levels. To overcome these limitations, it is necessary to foster a supportive environment for open communication on stress and implement a comprehensive assessment strategy when needed. •Simple stress question may miss covert stress in chronic daily headache (CDH).•Simple stress question may inadvertently capture CDH patients without notable stress.•CDH patients denying stress may still score high on validated assessment tool.•CDH stress assessment often requires additional tools and supportive environment.
AbstractList In managing chronic daily headaches (CDH), a comprehensive approach is necessary to evaluate stress, a closely linked factor. However, limited time and costs often lead to the use of a simple stress question in clinical settings. This study aims to assess the validity of using a simple stress question for CDH patients and explore its implications for clinical practice.BACKGROUNDIn managing chronic daily headaches (CDH), a comprehensive approach is necessary to evaluate stress, a closely linked factor. However, limited time and costs often lead to the use of a simple stress question in clinical settings. This study aims to assess the validity of using a simple stress question for CDH patients and explore its implications for clinical practice.We recruited 103 patients with CDH who completed structured self-administered questionnaires, including a simple stress question ("Have you had any stress or concerns in the last 4 weeks?") and validated Korean versions of questionnaires for depression, anxiety, insomnia, and the Brief Encounter Psychosocial Instrument (BEPSI). A headache specialist conducted clinical interviews. The stress group consisted of patients who acknowledged overt stress (answering "yes" to the simple question) and covert stress (initially answering "no" but later admitting during the interview). Results showed no statistical difference between the subgroups, so they were combined as the "acknowledged stress" group.METHODSWe recruited 103 patients with CDH who completed structured self-administered questionnaires, including a simple stress question ("Have you had any stress or concerns in the last 4 weeks?") and validated Korean versions of questionnaires for depression, anxiety, insomnia, and the Brief Encounter Psychosocial Instrument (BEPSI). A headache specialist conducted clinical interviews. The stress group consisted of patients who acknowledged overt stress (answering "yes" to the simple question) and covert stress (initially answering "no" but later admitting during the interview). Results showed no statistical difference between the subgroups, so they were combined as the "acknowledged stress" group.Out of 103 patients, 54.4% had chronic migraine, 45.6% had chronic tension-type headache, and 66 patients (64.1%) acknowledged experiencing stress. No significant differences were found in demographic and clinical characteristics, BEPSI stress assessment, or depression, anxiety, and insomnia profiles between patients with overt stress (n = 51) and covert stress (n = 15). The average BEPSI score was 2.3 ± 0.9, with 45.6% of patients exceeding the criteria (>2.4). Two (5.4%) patients in denial of stress had scores above the BEPSI criteria. Among patients below the criteria of BEPSI, 21 acknowledged stress, while 35 denied stress, with no significant differences observed.RESULTSOut of 103 patients, 54.4% had chronic migraine, 45.6% had chronic tension-type headache, and 66 patients (64.1%) acknowledged experiencing stress. No significant differences were found in demographic and clinical characteristics, BEPSI stress assessment, or depression, anxiety, and insomnia profiles between patients with overt stress (n = 51) and covert stress (n = 15). The average BEPSI score was 2.3 ± 0.9, with 45.6% of patients exceeding the criteria (>2.4). Two (5.4%) patients in denial of stress had scores above the BEPSI criteria. Among patients below the criteria of BEPSI, 21 acknowledged stress, while 35 denied stress, with no significant differences observed.This study suggests the limitations of relying solely on a simple stress question for assessing stress in patients with CDH in clinical practice. It is possible to encounter covert stress, include individuals who do not exhibit noticeable stress, and misclassify stress levels. To overcome these limitations, it is necessary to foster a supportive environment for open communication on stress and implement a comprehensive assessment strategy when needed.CONCLUSIONSThis study suggests the limitations of relying solely on a simple stress question for assessing stress in patients with CDH in clinical practice. It is possible to encounter covert stress, include individuals who do not exhibit noticeable stress, and misclassify stress levels. To overcome these limitations, it is necessary to foster a supportive environment for open communication on stress and implement a comprehensive assessment strategy when needed.
BackgroundIn managing chronic daily headaches (CDH), a comprehensive approach is necessary to evaluate stress, a closely linked factor. However, limited time and costs often lead to the use of a simple stress question in clinical settings. This study aims to assess the validity of using a simple stress question for CDH patients and explore its implications for clinical practice.MethodsWe recruited 103 patients with CDH who completed structured self-administered questionnaires, including a simple stress question ("Have you had any stress or concerns in the last 4 weeks?") and validated Korean versions of questionnaires for depression, anxiety, insomnia, and the Brief Encounter Psychosocial Instrument (BEPSI). A headache specialist conducted clinical interviews. The stress group consisted of patients who acknowledged overt stress (answering "yes" to the simple question) and covert stress (initially answering "no" but later admitting during the interview). Results showed no statistical difference between the subgroups, so they were combined as the "acknowledged stress" group.ResultsOut of 103 patients, 54.4% had chronic migraine, 45.6% had chronic tension-type headache, and 66 patients (64.1%) acknowledged experiencing stress. No significant differences were found in demographic and clinical characteristics, BEPSI stress assessment, or depression, anxiety, and insomnia profiles between patients with overt stress (n = 51) and covert stress (n = 15). The average BEPSI score was 2.3 ± 0.9, with 45.6% of patients exceeding the criteria (>2.4). Two (5.4%) patients in denial of stress had scores above the BEPSI criteria. Among patients below the criteria of BEPSI, 21 acknowledged stress, while 35 denied stress, with no significant differences observed.ConclusionsThis study suggests the limitations of relying solely on a simple stress question for assessing stress in patients with CDH in clinical practice. It is possible to encounter covert stress, include individuals who do not exhibit noticeable stress, and misclassify stress levels. To overcome these limitations, it is necessary to foster a supportive environment for open communication on stress and implement a comprehensive assessment strategy when needed.
In managing chronic daily headaches (CDH), a comprehensive approach is necessary to evaluate stress, a closely linked factor. However, limited time and costs often lead to the use of a simple stress question in clinical settings. This study aims to assess the validity of using a simple stress question for CDH patients and explore its implications for clinical practice. We recruited 103 patients with CDH who completed structured self-administered questionnaires, including a simple stress question ("Have you had any stress or concerns in the last 4 weeks?") and validated Korean versions of questionnaires for depression, anxiety, insomnia, and the Brief Encounter Psychosocial Instrument (BEPSI). A headache specialist conducted clinical interviews. The stress group consisted of patients who acknowledged overt stress (answering "yes" to the simple question) and covert stress (initially answering "no" but later admitting during the interview). Results showed no statistical difference between the subgroups, so they were combined as the "acknowledged stress" group. Out of 103 patients, 54.4% had chronic migraine, 45.6% had chronic tension-type headache, and 66 patients (64.1%) acknowledged experiencing stress. No significant differences were found in demographic and clinical characteristics, BEPSI stress assessment, or depression, anxiety, and insomnia profiles between patients with overt stress (n = 51) and covert stress (n = 15). The average BEPSI score was 2.3 ± 0.9, with 45.6% of patients exceeding the criteria (>2.4). Two (5.4%) patients in denial of stress had scores above the BEPSI criteria. Among patients below the criteria of BEPSI, 21 acknowledged stress, while 35 denied stress, with no significant differences observed. This study suggests the limitations of relying solely on a simple stress question for assessing stress in patients with CDH in clinical practice. It is possible to encounter covert stress, include individuals who do not exhibit noticeable stress, and misclassify stress levels. To overcome these limitations, it is necessary to foster a supportive environment for open communication on stress and implement a comprehensive assessment strategy when needed. •Simple stress question may miss covert stress in chronic daily headache (CDH).•Simple stress question may inadvertently capture CDH patients without notable stress.•CDH patients denying stress may still score high on validated assessment tool.•CDH stress assessment often requires additional tools and supportive environment.
AbstractBackgroundIn managing chronic daily headaches (CDH), a comprehensive approach is necessary to evaluate stress, a closely linked factor. However, limited time and costs often lead to the use of a simple stress question in clinical settings. This study aims to assess the validity of using a simple stress question for CDH patients and explore its implications for clinical practice. MethodsWe recruited 103 patients with CDH who completed structured self-administered questionnaires, including a simple stress question ("Have you had any stress or concerns in the last 4 weeks?") and validated Korean versions of questionnaires for depression, anxiety, insomnia, and the Brief Encounter Psychosocial Instrument (BEPSI). A headache specialist conducted clinical interviews. The stress group consisted of patients who acknowledged overt stress (answering "yes" to the simple question) and covert stress (initially answering "no" but later admitting during the interview). Results showed no statistical difference between the subgroups, so they were combined as the "acknowledged stress" group. ResultsOut of 103 patients, 54.4% had chronic migraine, 45.6% had chronic tension-type headache, and 66 patients (64.1%) acknowledged experiencing stress. No significant differences were found in demographic and clinical characteristics, BEPSI stress assessment, or depression, anxiety, and insomnia profiles between patients with overt stress (n = 51) and covert stress (n = 15). The average BEPSI score was 2.3 ± 0.9, with 45.6% of patients exceeding the criteria (>2.4). Two (5.4%) patients in denial of stress had scores above the BEPSI criteria. Among patients below the criteria of BEPSI, 21 acknowledged stress, while 35 denied stress, with no significant differences observed. ConclusionsThis study suggests the limitations of relying solely on a simple stress question for assessing stress in patients with CDH in clinical practice. It is possible to encounter covert stress, include individuals who do not exhibit noticeable stress, and misclassify stress levels. To overcome these limitations, it is necessary to foster a supportive environment for open communication on stress and implement a comprehensive assessment strategy when needed.
ArticleNumber 107944
Author Lee, Sang-Soo
Shin, Dong-Ick
Lee, Sung-Hyun
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Sung-Hyun
  orcidid: 0000-0003-0598-8065
  surname: Lee
  fullname: Lee, Sung-Hyun
  email: sunghlee@chungbuk.ac.kr
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Dong-Ick
  surname: Shin
  fullname: Shin, Dong-Ick
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Sang-Soo
  surname: Lee
  fullname: Lee, Sang-Soo
BookMark eNqNkUuPEzEQhC20SGQX_gKyxIXLBD9mPJ4LAq14SStxIHfL224Th4mdtWeQ8u_xJITDHoCTpXJ1qbq_a3IVU0RCXnK25oyrN7s1jCHinNNaMCGr2A9t-4SsuO5Fowalr8iKSSYb3ar-GbkuZccYk1LpFXnYbJGGWGbvAwSMcKTJU0tL2B9GpGXKWAp9mLFMIcXqpLaUKoX4_fLpU6awzSkGoM6G8Ui3aJ2FUzBdugWwIz1kC1MAfE6eejsWfPH7vSGbjx82t5-bu6-fvty-v2uglWxqnFItDE5Kx7XngxNoodPMKs286DrdCTVAX0XF4V704DQ6qby4F5yDa-UNeX2OPeR0qm_2oQCOo42Y5mKE7nTL2kH11frqkXWX5hxruerqBe9lJ0R1qbMLciolozeHHPY2Hw1nZgFhduYCwiwgzBlEHXx3HsS67c-A2ZTTpdGFjDAZl8K_I94-iric9Qcesfypy00RhplvC-0FtpCVs2L67wH_0-AX9UnCEA
Cites_doi 10.1093/pm/pnx269
10.1007/BF00845128
10.3988/jcn.2014.10.3.210
10.1111/j.1526-4610.2007.00970.x
10.3803/EnM.2014.29.4.405
10.1111/j.1526-4610.2007.00973.x
10.3988/jcn.2016.12.3.316
10.1177/2055102920933072
10.1177/0333102413485658
10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019929
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2023 Elsevier B.V.
Elsevier B.V.
2023. Elsevier B.V.
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2023 Elsevier B.V.
– notice: Elsevier B.V.
– notice: 2023. Elsevier B.V.
– notice: Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
3V.
7TK
7X7
7XB
88E
88G
8FI
8FJ
8FK
8G5
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
GUQSH
K9.
M0S
M1P
M2M
M2O
MBDVC
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PSYQQ
Q9U
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107944
DatabaseName CrossRef
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Neurosciences Abstracts
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Psychology Database (Alumni)
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
Research Library (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest Research Library
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni)
Medical Database
Psychology Database
Research Library (ProQuest)
Research Library (Corporate)
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Psychology
ProQuest Central Basic
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
ProQuest One Psychology
Research Library Prep
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
Research Library (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest Research Library
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Basic
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Psychology Journals (Alumni)
Neurosciences Abstracts
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest Psychology Journals
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
ProQuest One Psychology



Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1872-6968
EndPage 107944
ExternalDocumentID 10_1016_j_clineuro_2023_107944
S0303846723003608
1_s2_0_S0303846723003608
GeographicLocations South Korea
GeographicLocations_xml – name: South Korea
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
.1-
.FO
.GJ
.~1
0R~
1B1
1P~
1RT
1~.
1~5
29B
3O-
4.4
457
4CK
4G.
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
6J9
7-5
71M
7X7
88E
8FI
8FJ
8G5
8P~
9JM
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AATTM
AAXKI
AAXLA
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABBQC
ABCQJ
ABFNM
ABFRF
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABUWG
ABXDB
ACDAQ
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIEU
ACIUM
ACPRK
ACRLP
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADEZE
AEBSH
AEFWE
AEIPS
AEKER
AENEX
AEUPX
AEVXI
AFJKZ
AFKRA
AFPUW
AFRAH
AFRHN
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGCQF
AGHFR
AGUBO
AGWIK
AGYEJ
AHHHB
AHMBA
AIEXJ
AIGII
AIIUN
AIKHN
AITUG
AJRQY
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKRLJ
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ANKPU
ANZVX
APXCP
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
AZQEC
BENPR
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
BPHCQ
BVXVI
CCPQU
CS3
DU5
DWQXO
EBS
EFJIC
EFKBS
EJD
EMOBN
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
FYUFA
G-2
G-Q
GBLVA
GNUQQ
GUQSH
HDW
HMCUK
HMK
HMO
HMQ
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
KOM
LX8
M1P
M29
M2M
M2O
M2V
M41
MO0
MOBAO
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OQ-
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
PG~
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PSYQQ
PUEGO
Q38
R2-
ROL
RPZ
SAE
SCC
SDF
SDG
SDP
SEL
SES
SEW
SNS
SPCBC
SSH
SSN
SSZ
SV3
T5K
UKHRP
UNMZH
WUQ
Z5R
ZGI
~G-
AFCTW
AGRNS
ALIPV
RIG
AAYXX
CITATION
3V.
7TK
7XB
8FK
K9.
MBDVC
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
Q9U
7X8
EFLBG
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-d664c9d33d18f19d2eac580a680f25585269c7eac61cb27cd8ed36f2b211cd43
IEDL.DBID 7X7
ISSN 0303-8467
1872-6968
IngestDate Thu Sep 04 21:56:34 EDT 2025
Sat Jul 26 02:38:30 EDT 2025
Wed Aug 20 07:47:30 EDT 2025
Sat Jul 05 17:11:02 EDT 2025
Fri Jun 27 03:51:09 EDT 2025
Tue Aug 26 16:32:10 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords Stress assessment
Brief Encounter Psychosocial Instrument (BEPSI)
Simple stress question
Covert stress
Chronic daily headache
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c430t-d664c9d33d18f19d2eac580a680f25585269c7eac61cb27cd8ed36f2b211cd43
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0003-0598-8065
PQID 2872173522
PQPubID 1226360
PageCount 1
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2858404967
proquest_journals_2872173522
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clineuro_2023_107944
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_clineuro_2023_107944
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0303846723003608
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_clineuro_2023_107944
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2023-10-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-10-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2023
  text: 2023-10-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Assen
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Assen
PublicationTitle Clinical neurology and neurosurgery
PublicationYear 2023
Publisher Elsevier B.V
Elsevier Limited
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier B.V
– name: Elsevier Limited
References Yook, Kim (bib6) 1997; 16
Frank, Zyzanski (bib11) 1988; 26
Cha, Kim, Moon, Ahn, Oh, Kim (bib13) 2018; 19
Yim, Bae, Choi, Kim, Hwang, Huh (bib8) 1996; 17
Crosswell, Lockwood (bib15) 2020; 7
Brantley, Waggoner, Jones, Rappaport (bib14) 1987; 10
Kim, Lee, Kang, Kang, Kim, Kim (bib10) 2014; 29
Shahsavarani, Azad, Kalkhoran (bib16) 2015; 2
Houle, Nash (bib3) 2008; 48
Chu, Im, Ju, Yu, Ma, Kim (bib4) 2009; 27
Cha, Moon, Sohn, Kim, Song, Kim (bib12) 2016; 12
Cho, Sone, Morin (bib7) 2014; 10
Sher, Midgette, Lipton (bib2) 2008; 48
Nichols, Ellard, Griffiths, Kamal, Underwood, Taylor (bib1) 2017; 7
Rhee, Lee, Jung, Choi, Kim, Kim (bib5) 1995; 4
Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (bib9) 2013; 33
Nichols (10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107944_bib1) 2017; 7
Yim (10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107944_bib8) 1996; 17
Rhee (10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107944_bib5) 1995; 4
Cha (10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107944_bib12) 2016; 12
Brantley (10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107944_bib14) 1987; 10
Shahsavarani (10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107944_bib16) 2015; 2
Cha (10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107944_bib13) 2018; 19
Cho (10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107944_bib7) 2014; 10
Chu (10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107944_bib4) 2009; 27
Yook (10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107944_bib6) 1997; 16
Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107944_bib9) 2013; 33
Houle (10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107944_bib3) 2008; 48
Frank (10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107944_bib11) 1988; 26
Kim (10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107944_bib10) 2014; 29
Crosswell (10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107944_bib15) 2020; 7
Sher (10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107944_bib2) 2008; 48
References_xml – volume: 17
  start-page: 42
  year: 1996
  end-page: 53
  ident: bib8
  article-title: The validity of modified Korean-translated BEPSI (Brief Encounter Psychosocial Instrument) as instrument of stress measurement in outpatient clinic
  publication-title: J. Korean Acad. Fam. Med.
– volume: 48
  start-page: 16
  year: 2008
  end-page: 25
  ident: bib2
  article-title: Risk factors for headache chronification
  publication-title: Headache
– volume: 26
  start-page: 533
  year: 1988
  end-page: 539
  ident: bib11
  article-title: Stress in the clinical setting: The Brief Encounter Psychosocial Instrument
  publication-title: J. Fam. Pract.
– volume: 48
  start-page: 40
  year: 2008
  end-page: 44
  ident: bib3
  article-title: Stress and headache chronification
  publication-title: Headache
– volume: 19
  start-page: 1832
  year: 2018
  end-page: 1838
  ident: bib13
  article-title: Stress is associated with poor outcome of acute treatment of chronic migraine: a multicenter study
  publication-title: Pain Med.
– volume: 10
  start-page: 61
  year: 1987
  end-page: 74
  ident: bib14
  article-title: A daily stress inventory: development, reliability, and validity
  publication-title: J. Behav. Med.
– volume: 4
  start-page: 96
  year: 1995
  end-page: 104
  ident: bib5
  article-title: A standardization study of Beck Depression Inventory 2 - Korean version (K-BDI): validity
  publication-title: Korean J. Psychopathol.
– volume: 16
  start-page: 185
  year: 1997
  end-page: 197
  ident: bib6
  article-title: A clinical study on the Korean version of Beck Anxiety Inventory: comparative study of patient and non-patient
  publication-title: Korean J. Clin. Psychol.
– volume: 7
  year: 2020
  ident: bib15
  article-title: Best practices for stress measurement: how to measure psychological stress in health research
  publication-title: Health Psychol. Open
– volume: 27
  start-page: 1
  year: 2009
  end-page: 6
  ident: bib4
  article-title: Validity and reliability assessment of Korean Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6)
  publication-title: J. Korean Neurol. Assoc.
– volume: 10
  start-page: 210
  year: 2014
  end-page: 215
  ident: bib7
  article-title: Validation of a Korean version of the Insomnia Severity Index
  publication-title: J. Clin. Neurol.
– volume: 29
  start-page: 405
  year: 2014
  end-page: 409
  ident: bib10
  article-title: 2014 Clinical practice guidelines for overweight and obesity in Korea
  publication-title: Endocrinol. Metab.
– volume: 33
  start-page: 629
  year: 2013
  end-page: 808
  ident: bib9
  article-title: The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version)
  publication-title: Cephalalgia
– volume: 7
  year: 2017
  ident: bib1
  article-title: The lived experience of chronic headache: a systemic review and synthesis of the qualitative literature
  publication-title: BMJ Open
– volume: 2
  start-page: 230
  year: 2015
  end-page: 241
  ident: bib16
  article-title: Stress: facts and theories through literature review
  publication-title: Int. J. Med. Rev.
– volume: 12
  start-page: 312
  year: 2016
  end-page: 322
  ident: bib12
  article-title: Chronic daily headache and medication overuse headache in first-visit headache patients in Korea: a multicenter clinic-based study
  publication-title: J. Clin. Neurol.
– volume: 4
  start-page: 96
  issue: 1
  year: 1995
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107944_bib5
  article-title: A standardization study of Beck Depression Inventory 2 - Korean version (K-BDI): validity
  publication-title: Korean J. Psychopathol.
– volume: 19
  start-page: 1832
  issue: 9
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107944_bib13
  article-title: Stress is associated with poor outcome of acute treatment of chronic migraine: a multicenter study
  publication-title: Pain Med.
  doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx269
– volume: 10
  start-page: 61
  issue: 1
  year: 1987
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107944_bib14
  article-title: A daily stress inventory: development, reliability, and validity
  publication-title: J. Behav. Med.
  doi: 10.1007/BF00845128
– volume: 10
  start-page: 210
  issue: 3
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107944_bib7
  article-title: Validation of a Korean version of the Insomnia Severity Index
  publication-title: J. Clin. Neurol.
  doi: 10.3988/jcn.2014.10.3.210
– volume: 48
  start-page: 16
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107944_bib2
  article-title: Risk factors for headache chronification
  publication-title: Headache
  doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2007.00970.x
– volume: 17
  start-page: 42
  issue: 1
  year: 1996
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107944_bib8
  article-title: The validity of modified Korean-translated BEPSI (Brief Encounter Psychosocial Instrument) as instrument of stress measurement in outpatient clinic
  publication-title: J. Korean Acad. Fam. Med.
– volume: 29
  start-page: 405
  issue: 4
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107944_bib10
  article-title: 2014 Clinical practice guidelines for overweight and obesity in Korea
  publication-title: Endocrinol. Metab.
  doi: 10.3803/EnM.2014.29.4.405
– volume: 48
  start-page: 40
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107944_bib3
  article-title: Stress and headache chronification
  publication-title: Headache
  doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2007.00973.x
– volume: 26
  start-page: 533
  issue: 5
  year: 1988
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107944_bib11
  article-title: Stress in the clinical setting: The Brief Encounter Psychosocial Instrument
  publication-title: J. Fam. Pract.
– volume: 12
  start-page: 312
  issue: 3
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107944_bib12
  article-title: Chronic daily headache and medication overuse headache in first-visit headache patients in Korea: a multicenter clinic-based study
  publication-title: J. Clin. Neurol.
  doi: 10.3988/jcn.2016.12.3.316
– volume: 2
  start-page: 230
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107944_bib16
  article-title: Stress: facts and theories through literature review
  publication-title: Int. J. Med. Rev.
– volume: 7
  issue: 2
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107944_bib15
  article-title: Best practices for stress measurement: how to measure psychological stress in health research
  publication-title: Health Psychol. Open
  doi: 10.1177/2055102920933072
– volume: 33
  start-page: 629
  issue: 9
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107944_bib9
  article-title: The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version)
  publication-title: Cephalalgia
  doi: 10.1177/0333102413485658
– volume: 16
  start-page: 185
  issue: 1
  year: 1997
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107944_bib6
  article-title: A clinical study on the Korean version of Beck Anxiety Inventory: comparative study of patient and non-patient
  publication-title: Korean J. Clin. Psychol.
– volume: 7
  issue: 12
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107944_bib1
  article-title: The lived experience of chronic headache: a systemic review and synthesis of the qualitative literature
  publication-title: BMJ Open
  doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019929
– volume: 27
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107944_bib4
  article-title: Validity and reliability assessment of Korean Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6)
  publication-title: J. Korean Neurol. Assoc.
SSID ssj0003368
Score 2.3563845
Snippet In managing chronic daily headaches (CDH), a comprehensive approach is necessary to evaluate stress, a closely linked factor. However, limited time and costs...
AbstractBackgroundIn managing chronic daily headaches (CDH), a comprehensive approach is necessary to evaluate stress, a closely linked factor. However,...
BackgroundIn managing chronic daily headaches (CDH), a comprehensive approach is necessary to evaluate stress, a closely linked factor. However, limited time...
SourceID proquest
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 107944
SubjectTerms Anxiety
Body mass index
Brief Encounter Psychosocial Instrument (BEPSI)
Chronic daily headache
Chronic illnesses
Clinical medicine
Covert stress
Headache
Headaches
Hospitals
Insomnia
Mental depression
Migraine
Neurology
Neurosurgery
Normal distribution
Patients
Questionnaires
Simple stress question
Sleep disorders
Stress assessment
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: Elsevier SD Freedom Collection
  dbid: .~1
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3NS8MwFA9jB_EifuJ0SgSv3dombdqjDMcQ9OKE3UKWpLAh3bTbwYt_u--lzfxCED02eW3a15df3iPv90LIpYGwKjbCBrnhOuDWpkGmoiJgGquJaVEU7uiE27t09MBvJsmkRQaeC4NplQ3215ju0Lpp6Tfa7C9ns_49mCfD1ROcaIBhR_jlXKCt917f0zwYc3Q4FA5Q-gNLeN5D9iHWwOjhIeLQCMbJf1qgvkC1W3-Gu2SncRzpVf1ue6Rly32yddtsjR-QJ_jhFDPLXU0IJFTSRUEVrWZY_5fWnBDqHg2_AiSpcvu9sHT5TvBfqa6L5VKjZo8vFJDaYMVnFPccSuqJVYdkPLweD0ZBc55CoDkLV4FJU65zw5iJsiLKTQygm2ShSrOwgMgiw8PGtYDGNNLTWGiTWcPSIp5CkKgNZ0ekXS5Ke0woNwmyWBVTLOc2ElOjE8VEmBRhBFYRdUjf61Au66oZ0qeTzaXXukSty1rrHSK8qqX_HkAxCcD-tztt1UzGSkayimUovxlMh-SbOz_Z3K9G7Xp7kJuBIPqECA9d2g652HTDfMVNGFXaxRplwOWDsCwVJ_8Y_pRs41WdVdgl7dXz2p6Bd7SanjvzfwOCgQ9r
  priority: 102
  providerName: Elsevier
Title The insufficiency of a simple stress question in assessing stress for chronic daily headache in clinical practice
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0303846723003608
https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0303846723003608
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107944
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2872173522
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2858404967
Volume 233
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Ra9swED7WFkpfxra2NFsXNNirUsuSLftptKUl22gYXQd5E4okQ0NJ2jp96Et_--5kKxuDlbEngy1Z-PTp7jtLdwfw0aNblXsdeO2V4yqEkldWNFw6yibmdNPE0gkXk3L8Q32ZFtP-h1vbH6tMOjEqar909I_8CJk9smeiC59u7zhVjaLd1b6ExgZsxdRliGc9XTtcmZQxFA5xLDnZ2d8ihOcjijyk_BcjKiCONxGY6m_G6Q81HW3P-St42ZNGdtzN8mt4ERZvYPui3xbfhTucbEanymM-CAqmZMuGWdZeU-5f1sWDsPhqnAZsyWzc60WzlR4id2WuS5TLvL2-eWSopT1le6bmKX6SpaCqPbg6P7s6HfO-lgJ3SmYr7stSudpL6UXViNrnqHCLKrNllTXoVVRUaNxpvFkKN8u181XwsmzyGTqIziu5D5uL5SIcAFO-oAhWK62sVRB65l1hpc6KJhOICDGAoyRDc9tlzDDpKNncJKkbkrrppD4AnURt0vegBjOo1P-vZ2j7hdgaYdrcZOY7YYAggB4X2uysGkC97tlzjY5D_NOohwkPZj3QL3wO4MP6Ma5V2oCxi7B8oDZI99AlK_Xb51_xDnZovO7Q4CFsru4fwnskP6vZEDZGT2IYcT6ErePPX8cTvJ6cTb5d_gRBngkd
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1LT9wwEB7xkEovFdBWLNBiJDgaktiJkwNCFQUtj-XCVtqb5bUdaRHahWYR4kfxHzuTxAtCalUhcU0cW5nM45vY3wzAjsO0KnHK88JJy6X3Gc9NXHJhqZqYVWVZt07oXWbdX_JskA7m4ClwYehYZfCJtaN2E0v_yPcR2SN6JrhweHvHqWsU7a6GFhqNWpz7xwdM2aqD05_4fXeT5OS4f9TlbVcBbqWIptxlmbSFE8LFeRkXLkHXk-aRyfKoRHydU8ttq_BiFtthoqzLvRNZmQwxVbJOCpx2HhZxqoKMSA1m-V0kRM28Q7MRnML6C0Ly9R4RHancxh71K8eLaAfyb7HwVVSoQ93JMnxqMSr70SjVCsz58Sp86LW78J_hDnWL0SH2uvwEcTfZpGSGVSMqNcwa-gmrp8avjiOZqbeWMUqGmwiVmW3q8jJnRjePDIOCo-LSNDzQNVngcH2B_nsI-SssjCdjvwZMupQIs0YYUUgfq6GzqREqSssoRgWMO7AfZKhvmwIdOpxcu9ZB6pqkrhupd0AFUevwPugwNcaQtz3pq9buKx3rKtGRviIdIBXABA8hQpR3oJg92UKbBrL816qbQR_0bKFnc-jA9uw2ugba7zFjP7mnMYguMQPM1Pq_p9iCpW6_d6EvTi_PN-Ajrd2cV9yEhenve_8Ncdd0-L3Wdgb6na3rDyrbQZc
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3da9RAEB_qFYovxfqBV2tdQR-3l2Q32eShiNoerbVH0Qp9W_b2A1rKXWuuSP9E_ytnkt1TBEWEviabXTKZj99m5zcD8MrhtqpwyvPGScul9xWvTR64sFRNzKoQutYJx5Pq4Iv8cFaercD3xIWhtMrkEztH7eaW_pGPENkjeia4MAoxLeJkb_zm6ppTByk6aU3tNExss-B2u3JjkeRx5G-_4Xau3T3cw2__uijG-6fvD3jsOMCtFNmCu6qStnFCuLwOeeMKdEtlnZmqzgJi75racVuFF6vcTgtlXe2dqEIxxW2UdVLgtPdgVWGQLAaw-m5_cvJpGRaE6Hh5aFSCU9D_ha58sUM0SCrGsUPdzPEiWon8U6T8LWZ0gXD8ANYjgmVve5XbgBU_ewhrx_GM_hFco-YxSnHvilMQs5PNAzOsPadCxKwnp7BuatQJHMlMd_CMMTTdRCDNbF-1lzlzfnnLMGQ4Kj1NwxOZkyWG12M4vQsxP4HBbD7zT4FJVxKd1ggjGulzNXW2NEJlZchyVM98CKMkQ33Vl-_QKa_tQiepa5K67qU-BJVErdP7oDvVGGH-70nfRq_Q6ly3hc70Z9IBUgHc_iGAyOohNMsnI_DpAc0_rbqV9EEvF_ppLEN4ubyNjoNOg8zMz29oDGJP3B9WavPvU7yANbQ0_fFwcvQM7tPSfTLjFgwWX2_8cwRli-l2VHcG-o4N7AfdfUxZ
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+insufficiency+of+a+simple+stress+question+in+assessing+stress+for+chronic+daily+headache+in+clinical+practice&rft.jtitle=Clinical+neurology+and+neurosurgery&rft.au=Sung-Hyun%2C+Lee&rft.au=Dong-Ick+Shin&rft.au=Sang-Soo%2C+Lee&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Limited&rft.issn=0303-8467&rft.eissn=1872-6968&rft.volume=233&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.clineuro.2023.107944&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK
thumbnail_m http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F03038467%2FS0303846723X00092%2Fcov150h.gif