Trivial and Important Criteria for Social Categorization in the Minimal Group Paradigm

The study examined how the importance of a criterion for social categorization can vary with the social context. The main hypothesis was that there would be no difference between the influence of two criteria of differing real-world importance when each is used independently as the only criterion fo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of social psychology Vol. 126; no. 3; pp. 345 - 354
Main Authors Moghaddam, Fathali M., Stringer, Peter
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington, DC Taylor & Francis Group 01.06.1986
Heldref
Clark University Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0022-4545
1940-1183
DOI10.1080/00224545.1986.9713595

Cover

More Information
Summary:The study examined how the importance of a criterion for social categorization can vary with the social context. The main hypothesis was that there would be no difference between the influence of two criteria of differing real-world importance when each is used independently as the only criterion for social categorization in the same minimal group setting. The subsidiary hypothesis was that social categorization on both a trivial and an important basis would lead to positive in-group bias. The subjects were 66 schoolboys. Social categorization was on the basis of either a minimal criterion or subjects' school house-system. Both the main and the subsidiary hypotheses were confirmed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0022-4545
1940-1183
DOI:10.1080/00224545.1986.9713595