Logo Effects on Brand Extension Evaluations from the Electrophysiological Perspective
Brand extension typically has two strategies: brand name extension (BN) and brand logo extension (BL). The current study explored which strategy (BN or BL) better enhanced the success of dissimilar brand extension and product promotion in enterprises. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were used to inv...
Saved in:
Published in | Frontiers in neuroscience Vol. 11; p. 113 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Switzerland
Frontiers Research Foundation
08.03.2017
Frontiers Media S.A |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1662-453X 1662-4548 1662-453X |
DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2017.00113 |
Cover
Summary: | Brand extension typically has two strategies: brand name extension (BN) and brand logo extension (BL). The current study explored which strategy (BN or BL) better enhanced the success of dissimilar brand extension and product promotion in enterprises. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were used to investigate electrophysiological processes when subjects evaluated their acceptance of the brand extension using a combined picture of S1 and S2. S1 was a famous brand presented by two identity signs (brand name and brand logo). S2 was a picture of an extension product that belonged to a dissimilar product category than S1. The behavior data showed that BL was more acceptable than BN in the dissimilar brand extension. The neurophysiology process was reflected by a less negative N2 component and a larger P300 component in the BL than in the BN. We suggested that N2 reflected a whole conflict between the brand-product combination and the long-term memory and that P300 could be regarded as the reflection of the categorization process in the working memory. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 This article was submitted to Neural Technology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neuroscience Reviewed by: Hans-Eckhardt Schaefer, University of Stuttgart, Germany; Sorin Cristian Ionescu, Politehnica University of Bucharest, Romania Edited by: Ioan Opris, University of Miami School of Medicine, USA |
ISSN: | 1662-453X 1662-4548 1662-453X |
DOI: | 10.3389/fnins.2017.00113 |