Logo Effects on Brand Extension Evaluations from the Electrophysiological Perspective

Brand extension typically has two strategies: brand name extension (BN) and brand logo extension (BL). The current study explored which strategy (BN or BL) better enhanced the success of dissimilar brand extension and product promotion in enterprises. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were used to inv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in neuroscience Vol. 11; p. 113
Main Authors Shang, Qian, Pei, Guanxiong, Dai, Shenyi, Wang, Xiaoyi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Research Foundation 08.03.2017
Frontiers Media S.A
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1662-453X
1662-4548
1662-453X
DOI10.3389/fnins.2017.00113

Cover

More Information
Summary:Brand extension typically has two strategies: brand name extension (BN) and brand logo extension (BL). The current study explored which strategy (BN or BL) better enhanced the success of dissimilar brand extension and product promotion in enterprises. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were used to investigate electrophysiological processes when subjects evaluated their acceptance of the brand extension using a combined picture of S1 and S2. S1 was a famous brand presented by two identity signs (brand name and brand logo). S2 was a picture of an extension product that belonged to a dissimilar product category than S1. The behavior data showed that BL was more acceptable than BN in the dissimilar brand extension. The neurophysiology process was reflected by a less negative N2 component and a larger P300 component in the BL than in the BN. We suggested that N2 reflected a whole conflict between the brand-product combination and the long-term memory and that P300 could be regarded as the reflection of the categorization process in the working memory.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
This article was submitted to Neural Technology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neuroscience
Reviewed by: Hans-Eckhardt Schaefer, University of Stuttgart, Germany; Sorin Cristian Ionescu, Politehnica University of Bucharest, Romania
Edited by: Ioan Opris, University of Miami School of Medicine, USA
ISSN:1662-453X
1662-4548
1662-453X
DOI:10.3389/fnins.2017.00113