Comparing and evaluating the efficacy of methotrexate and actinomycin D as first-line single chemotherapy agents in low risk gestational trophoblastic disease

The aim of this study was to compare responses to single-agent chemotherapies and evaluate the predictive factors of resistance in low risk (LR) gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD). The chemotherapy agents included methotrexate (MTX) and actinomycin D (ACT-D). We conducted a retrospective study...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of gynecologic oncology Vol. 28; no. 2; pp. e8 - 7
Main Authors Lee, Young-Jae, Park, Jeong-Yeol, Kim, Dae-Yeon, Suh, Dae-Shik, Kim, Jong-Hyeok, Kim, Yong-Man, Kim, Young-Tak, Nam, Joo-Hyun
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Korea (South) Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology 01.03.2017
대한부인종양학회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2005-0380
2005-0399
2005-0399
DOI10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e8

Cover

Abstract The aim of this study was to compare responses to single-agent chemotherapies and evaluate the predictive factors of resistance in low risk (LR) gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD). The chemotherapy agents included methotrexate (MTX) and actinomycin D (ACT-D). We conducted a retrospective study of 126 patients with GTD who were treated between 2000 and 2013. A total of 71 patients with LR GTD were treated with MTX (8-day regimen or weekly regimen, n=53) or ACT-D (bi-weekly pulsed regimen or 5-day regimen, n=18). The successful treatment group and the failed treatment group were compared and analyzed to identify prognostic factors. The complete response rates were 83.3% for ACT-D and 62.2% for MTX, with no statistically significant difference. There was no severe adverse effect reported for either group. Longer interval durations from the index pregnancy (>2 months, p=0.040) and larger tumor size (>3 cm, p=0.020) were more common in non-responders than in responders; these results were statistically significant. Based on our results, ACT-D may be a better option than MTX as a first-line single chemotherapy agent for LR GTD. The bi-weekly pulsed ACT-D regimen had minimal, or at least the same, toxicities compared with MTX. However, due to the lack of strong supporting evidence, it cannot be conclusively stated that this is the best single agent for first-line chemotherapy in LR GTD patients. Further larger controlled trials will be necessary to establish the best guidelines for GTD treatment.
AbstractList The aim of this study was to compare responses to single-agent chemotherapies and evaluate the predictive factors of resistance in low risk (LR) gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD). The chemotherapy agents included methotrexate (MTX) and actinomycin D (ACT-D).OBJECTIVEThe aim of this study was to compare responses to single-agent chemotherapies and evaluate the predictive factors of resistance in low risk (LR) gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD). The chemotherapy agents included methotrexate (MTX) and actinomycin D (ACT-D).We conducted a retrospective study of 126 patients with GTD who were treated between 2000 and 2013. A total of 71 patients with LR GTD were treated with MTX (8-day regimen or weekly regimen, n=53) or ACT-D (bi-weekly pulsed regimen or 5-day regimen, n=18). The successful treatment group and the failed treatment group were compared and analyzed to identify prognostic factors.METHODSWe conducted a retrospective study of 126 patients with GTD who were treated between 2000 and 2013. A total of 71 patients with LR GTD were treated with MTX (8-day regimen or weekly regimen, n=53) or ACT-D (bi-weekly pulsed regimen or 5-day regimen, n=18). The successful treatment group and the failed treatment group were compared and analyzed to identify prognostic factors.The complete response rates were 83.3% for ACT-D and 62.2% for MTX, with no statistically significant difference. There was no severe adverse effect reported for either group. Longer interval durations from the index pregnancy (>2 months, p=0.040) and larger tumor size (>3 cm, p=0.020) were more common in non-responders than in responders; these results were statistically significant.RESULTSThe complete response rates were 83.3% for ACT-D and 62.2% for MTX, with no statistically significant difference. There was no severe adverse effect reported for either group. Longer interval durations from the index pregnancy (>2 months, p=0.040) and larger tumor size (>3 cm, p=0.020) were more common in non-responders than in responders; these results were statistically significant.Based on our results, ACT-D may be a better option than MTX as a first-line single chemotherapy agent for LR GTD. The bi-weekly pulsed ACT-D regimen had minimal, or at least the same, toxicities compared with MTX. However, due to the lack of strong supporting evidence, it cannot be conclusively stated that this is the best single agent for first-line chemotherapy in LR GTD patients. Further larger controlled trials will be necessary to establish the best guidelines for GTD treatment.CONCLUSIONBased on our results, ACT-D may be a better option than MTX as a first-line single chemotherapy agent for LR GTD. The bi-weekly pulsed ACT-D regimen had minimal, or at least the same, toxicities compared with MTX. However, due to the lack of strong supporting evidence, it cannot be conclusively stated that this is the best single agent for first-line chemotherapy in LR GTD patients. Further larger controlled trials will be necessary to establish the best guidelines for GTD treatment.
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare responses to single-agent chemotherapies and evaluate the predictive factors of resistance in low risk (LR) gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD). The chemotherapy agents included methotrexate (MTX) and actinomycin D (ACT-D). Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 126 patients with GTD who were treated between 2000 and 2013. A total of 71 patients with LR GTD were treated with MTX (8-day regimen or weekly regimen, n=53) or ACT-D (bi-weekly pulsed regimen or 5-day regimen, n=18). The successful treatment group and the failed treatment group were compared and analyzed to identify prognostic factors. Results: The complete response rates were 83.3% for ACT-D and 62.2% for MTX, with no statistically significant difference. There was no severe adverse effect reported for either group. Longer interval durations from the index pregnancy (>2 months, p=0.040) and larger tumor size (>3 cm, p=0.020) were more common in non-responders than in responders; these results were statistically significant. Conclusion: Based on our results, ACT-D may be a better option than MTX as a first-line single chemotherapy agent for LR GTD. The bi-weekly pulsed ACT-D regimen had minimal, or at least the same, toxicities compared with MTX. However, due to the lack of strong supporting evidence, it cannot be conclusively stated that this is the best single agent for first-line chemotherapy in LR GTD patients. Further larger controlled trials will be necessary to establish the best guidelines for GTD treatment. KCI Citation Count: 4
The aim of this study was to compare responses to single-agent chemotherapies and evaluate the predictive factors of resistance in low risk (LR) gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD). The chemotherapy agents included methotrexate (MTX) and actinomycin D (ACT-D). We conducted a retrospective study of 126 patients with GTD who were treated between 2000 and 2013. A total of 71 patients with LR GTD were treated with MTX (8-day regimen or weekly regimen, n=53) or ACT-D (bi-weekly pulsed regimen or 5-day regimen, n=18). The successful treatment group and the failed treatment group were compared and analyzed to identify prognostic factors. The complete response rates were 83.3% for ACT-D and 62.2% for MTX, with no statistically significant difference. There was no severe adverse effect reported for either group. Longer interval durations from the index pregnancy (>2 months, p=0.040) and larger tumor size (>3 cm, p=0.020) were more common in non-responders than in responders; these results were statistically significant. Based on our results, ACT-D may be a better option than MTX as a first-line single chemotherapy agent for LR GTD. The bi-weekly pulsed ACT-D regimen had minimal, or at least the same, toxicities compared with MTX. However, due to the lack of strong supporting evidence, it cannot be conclusively stated that this is the best single agent for first-line chemotherapy in LR GTD patients. Further larger controlled trials will be necessary to establish the best guidelines for GTD treatment.
Author Kim, Yong-Man
Lee, Young-Jae
Nam, Joo-Hyun
Kim, Young-Tak
Kim, Dae-Yeon
Park, Jeong-Yeol
Suh, Dae-Shik
Kim, Jong-Hyeok
AuthorAffiliation Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Young-Jae
  orcidid: 0000-0001-6557-2454
  surname: Lee
  fullname: Lee, Young-Jae
  organization: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Jeong-Yeol
  orcidid: 0000-0003-2475-7123
  surname: Park
  fullname: Park, Jeong-Yeol
  organization: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Dae-Yeon
  surname: Kim
  fullname: Kim, Dae-Yeon
  organization: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Dae-Shik
  surname: Suh
  fullname: Suh, Dae-Shik
  organization: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Jong-Hyeok
  surname: Kim
  fullname: Kim, Jong-Hyeok
  organization: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Yong-Man
  orcidid: 0000-0003-3225-5748
  surname: Kim
  fullname: Kim, Yong-Man
  organization: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Young-Tak
  surname: Kim
  fullname: Kim, Young-Tak
  organization: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Joo-Hyun
  orcidid: 0000-0002-8440-3370
  surname: Nam
  fullname: Nam, Joo-Hyun
  organization: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27819410$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002205240$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
BookMark eNqFkUtvEzEUhUeoiD5gyxJ5CYuktscz8WyQqvCqVAkJZW_duWMnbj32YDst-TP8VpymlIeEWF1b_u45vvecVkc-eF1VLxmd15Ly8-t1mHPKFnMu51o-qU44pc2M1l139HiW9Lg6Tema0nZBJX9WHfOFZJ1g9KT6vgzjBNH6NQE_EH0Lbgt5f80bTbQxFgF3JBgy6rwJOepvkPU9C1i4MO7QevKOQCLGxpRnznpNUlFwmuBGj6EIRZh2BNba50QK7cIdiTbdkLVOubgFD47kGKZN6B2kbJEMNmlI-nn11IBL-sVDPatWH96vlp9mV58_Xi4vrmYouMiz3khkTUOHgTPBBtm30tRSiKbGrsYBcWCSC5RN3TYoDEizaFH0HXam7fq2PqveHGR9NOoGrQpg7-s6qJuoLr6sLhWrBZNMFvb8wG79BLs7cE5N0Y4Qd4pRtQ9FlVDUPhTFpdL7jreHjmnbj3rAsoYIv7r2Xn--eLspzreqqXnNZVcEXj8IxPB1W3amRptQOwdeh21S5VcLyruupQV99bvXo8nPxAsgDgDGkFLURqE9ZFCsrfv3DPO_2v4z9A9BfdR8
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s11912_020_0876_1
crossref_primary_10_3892_ol_2019_9911
crossref_primary_10_1002_ijgo_12629
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_018_4512_5
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_021_08849_7
crossref_primary_10_1111_ajco_13774
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11684_021_0855_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bpobgyn_2021_01_006
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygyno_2017_11_031
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11864_024_01235_y
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2023_1276771
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.06.004
10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60280-2
10.1016/j.ejca.2014.05.002
10.1200/JCO.2010.30.4386
10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.03.039
10.1007/s11912-014-0408-y
10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.12.024
10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.072
10.1006/gyno.2001.6271
10.5468/ogs.2015.58.4.277
10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.05.013
10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.11.004
10.1016/j.ajog.2009.03.011
10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.08.003
10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181a8333d
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2017. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology
Copyright © 2017. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2017
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2017. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology
– notice: Copyright © 2017. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2017
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
ADTOC
UNPAY
ACYCR
DOI 10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e8
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
Unpaywall for CDI: Periodical Content
Unpaywall
Korean Citation Index
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic

MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: UNPAY
  name: Unpaywall
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://unpaywall.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Access Repository
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 2005-0399
EndPage 7
ExternalDocumentID oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_1341818
10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e8
PMC5323289
27819410
10_3802_jgo_2017_28_e8
Genre Evaluation Studies
Journal Article
Comparative Study
GroupedDBID 29K
2WC
5-W
53G
5GY
8JR
8XY
9ZL
AAKDD
AAYXX
ABDBF
ACUHS
ADBBV
AENEX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
BAWUL
CITATION
D-I
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBD
EF.
F5P
GROUPED_DOAJ
HYE
HZB
OK1
RPM
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
M~E
NPM
7X8
5PM
ADTOC
UNPAY
ACYCR
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-bf8c1550dd2141d8b68f384453c93cdccd1824c85365c4fa8f76c4b9c9f69b63
IEDL.DBID UNPAY
ISSN 2005-0380
2005-0399
IngestDate Sun Mar 09 07:51:09 EDT 2025
Wed Oct 29 12:03:30 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 13:51:28 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 09:20:33 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 23:10:33 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:37:29 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:12:38 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords Gestational Trophoblastic Disease
Dactinomycin
Methotrexate
Drug Therapy
Language English
License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
Copyright © 2017. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
cc-by-nc
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c424t-bf8c1550dd2141d8b68f384453c93cdccd1824c85365c4fa8f76c4b9c9f69b63
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e8
G704-001660.2017.28.2.005
ORCID 0000-0003-3225-5748
0000-0003-2475-7123
0000-0002-8440-3370
0000-0001-6557-2454
OpenAccessLink https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://ejgo.org/Synapse/Data/PDFData/1114JGO/jgo-28-e8.pdf
PMID 27819410
PQID 1837029960
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_1341818
unpaywall_primary_10_3802_jgo_2017_28_e8
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5323289
proquest_miscellaneous_1837029960
pubmed_primary_27819410
crossref_citationtrail_10_3802_jgo_2017_28_e8
crossref_primary_10_3802_jgo_2017_28_e8
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2017-03-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2017-03-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 03
  year: 2017
  text: 2017-03-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Korea (South)
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Korea (South)
PublicationTitle Journal of gynecologic oncology
PublicationTitleAlternate J Gynecol Oncol
PublicationYear 2017
Publisher Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology
대한부인종양학회
Publisher_xml – name: Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology
– name: 대한부인종양학회
References Mousavi (10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e8_ref11) 2012; 116
Taylor (10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e8_ref16) 2013; 49
Lawrie (10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e8_ref13) 2016
Lurain (10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e8_ref15) 2012; 57
Yarandi (10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e8_ref14) 2008; 103
Chapman-Davis (10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e8_ref9) 2012; 125
Lertkhachonsuk (10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e8_ref12) 2009; 19
Chalouhi (10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e8_ref8) 2009; 200
May (10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e8_ref1) 2011; 2011
Osborne (10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e8_ref10) 2011; 29
Froeling (10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e8_ref4) 2014; 16
Odicino (10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e8_ref7) 2008; 101
Lurain (10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e8_ref2) 2011; 204
Eoh (10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e8_ref6) 2015; 58
Even (10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e8_ref5) 2014; 50
Taylor (10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e8_ref17) 2015; 136
Seckl (10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e8_ref3) 2010; 376
Kwon (10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e8_ref18) 2001; 82
25318458 - Curr Oncol Rep. 2014 Nov;16(11):408
21996593 - Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012 Jan;116(1):39-42
21263100 - J Clin Oncol. 2011 Mar 1;29(7):825-31
26217597 - Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2015 Jul;58(4):277-83
23870384 - Eur J Cancer. 2013 Oct;49(15):3184-90
19393597 - Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jun;200(6):643.e1-6
18199437 - Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008 May;101(2):205-10
19574798 - Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009 Jul;19(5):985-8
25542400 - Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Feb;136(2):258-63
22449733 - Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Jun;125(3):572-5
11531296 - Gynecol Oncol. 2001 Aug;82(2):367-70
18632105 - Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008 Oct;103(1):33-7
22838241 - J Reprod Med. 2012 Jul-Aug;57(7-8):283-7
20673583 - Lancet. 2010 Aug 28;376(9742):717-29
27281496 - Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 09;(6):CD007102
24910417 - Eur J Cancer. 2014 Aug;50(12):2082-9
20739008 - Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jan;204(1):11-8
22312558 - Chemother Res Pract. 2011;2011:806256
References_xml – volume: 49
  start-page: 3184
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e8_ref16
  publication-title: Eur J Cancer
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.06.004
– volume: 376
  start-page: 717
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e8_ref3
  publication-title: Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60280-2
– volume: 50
  start-page: 2082
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e8_ref5
  publication-title: Eur J Cancer
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.05.002
– volume: 29
  start-page: 825
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e8_ref10
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.4386
– start-page: CD007102
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e8_ref13
  publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
– volume: 125
  start-page: 572
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e8_ref9
  publication-title: Gynecol Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.03.039
– volume: 16
  start-page: 408
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e8_ref4
  publication-title: Curr Oncol Rep
  doi: 10.1007/s11912-014-0408-y
– volume: 136
  start-page: 258
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e8_ref17
  publication-title: Gynecol Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.12.024
– volume: 204
  start-page: 11
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e8_ref2
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.072
– volume: 82
  start-page: 367
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e8_ref18
  publication-title: Gynecol Oncol
  doi: 10.1006/gyno.2001.6271
– volume: 58
  start-page: 277
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e8_ref6
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol Sci
  doi: 10.5468/ogs.2015.58.4.277
– volume: 57
  start-page: 283
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e8_ref15
  publication-title: J Reprod Med
– volume: 103
  start-page: 33
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e8_ref14
  publication-title: Int J Gynaecol Obstet
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.05.013
– volume: 101
  start-page: 205
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e8_ref7
  publication-title: Int J Gynaecol Obstet
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.11.004
– volume: 200
  start-page: 643.e1
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e8_ref8
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.03.011
– volume: 2011
  start-page: 806256
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e8_ref1
  publication-title: Chemother Res Pract
– volume: 116
  start-page: 39
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e8_ref11
  publication-title: Int J Gynaecol Obstet
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.08.003
– volume: 19
  start-page: 985
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e8_ref12
  publication-title: Int J Gynecol Cancer
  doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181a8333d
– reference: 11531296 - Gynecol Oncol. 2001 Aug;82(2):367-70
– reference: 19393597 - Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jun;200(6):643.e1-6
– reference: 25318458 - Curr Oncol Rep. 2014 Nov;16(11):408
– reference: 20673583 - Lancet. 2010 Aug 28;376(9742):717-29
– reference: 22838241 - J Reprod Med. 2012 Jul-Aug;57(7-8):283-7
– reference: 19574798 - Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009 Jul;19(5):985-8
– reference: 23870384 - Eur J Cancer. 2013 Oct;49(15):3184-90
– reference: 18632105 - Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008 Oct;103(1):33-7
– reference: 22449733 - Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Jun;125(3):572-5
– reference: 24910417 - Eur J Cancer. 2014 Aug;50(12):2082-9
– reference: 27281496 - Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 09;(6):CD007102
– reference: 25542400 - Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Feb;136(2):258-63
– reference: 18199437 - Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008 May;101(2):205-10
– reference: 21263100 - J Clin Oncol. 2011 Mar 1;29(7):825-31
– reference: 26217597 - Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2015 Jul;58(4):277-83
– reference: 20739008 - Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jan;204(1):11-8
– reference: 22312558 - Chemother Res Pract. 2011;2011:806256
– reference: 21996593 - Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012 Jan;116(1):39-42
SSID ssj0067082
Score 2.1428354
Snippet The aim of this study was to compare responses to single-agent chemotherapies and evaluate the predictive factors of resistance in low risk (LR) gestational...
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare responses to single-agent chemotherapies and evaluate the predictive factors of resistance in low risk (LR)...
SourceID nrf
unpaywall
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage e8
SubjectTerms Adult
Antineoplastic Agents - administration & dosage
Dactinomycin - administration & dosage
Drug Administration Schedule
Female
Gestational Trophoblastic Disease - drug therapy
Humans
Methotrexate - administration & dosage
Original
Pregnancy
Retrospective Studies
산부인과학
Title Comparing and evaluating the efficacy of methotrexate and actinomycin D as first-line single chemotherapy agents in low risk gestational trophoblastic disease
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27819410
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1837029960
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5323289
http://ejgo.org/Synapse/Data/PDFData/1114JGO/jgo-28-e8.pdf
https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002205240
UnpaywallVersion publishedVersion
Volume 28
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
ispartofPNX Journal of Gynecologic Oncology, 2017, 28(2), , pp.1-7
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVAON
  databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2005-0399
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0067082
  issn: 2005-0399
  databaseCode: DOA
  dateStart: 20110101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– providerCode: PRVEBS
  databaseName: EBSCOhost Academic Search Ultimate
  customDbUrl: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s3936755&profile=ehost&defaultdb=asn
  eissn: 2005-0399
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0067082
  issn: 2005-0399
  databaseCode: ABDBF
  dateStart: 20111201
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.ebscohost.com/direct.asp?db=asn
  providerName: EBSCOhost
– providerCode: PRVBFR
  databaseName: Free Medical Journals at publisher websites
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2005-0399
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0067082
  issn: 2005-0399
  databaseCode: DIK
  dateStart: 20080101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://www.freemedicaljournals.com
  providerName: Flying Publisher
– providerCode: PRVERR
  databaseName: [Open Access] KoreaMed
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2005-0399
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0067082
  issn: 2005-0399
  databaseCode: 5-W
  dateStart: 20080101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://koreamed.org/journals
  providerName: Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors
– providerCode: PRVAQN
  databaseName: PubMed Central
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2005-0399
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0067082
  issn: 2005-0399
  databaseCode: RPM
  dateStart: 20080101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/
  providerName: National Library of Medicine
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3fb9MwELZYJwEv4-cg_JgMQoKXpI3jJM7jtFLGpI1JbNIQD5bt2Ftpl1RtqlH-GP5W7pK0UA0E4ilJc02a9LP8ne_uO0JeOZtpJrT1rbCRz8Nez1c9x_2Yq5QbyyOmsDj58CjZP-UHZ_HZz6xK--W8rOP3HxeFmsxst68q1T3uD-otjEt-8O5DF4x8JuDywSR3G2QziYGHd8jm6dHx7ifsJofymr2obpvW7mdZo9gIHzL8PiZ1pQETgRVrM9JGMXW_I5vXcyZvzYuJWlyp8fiXCWlwh3xelvU0eSijYF7pwHy7rvL4H896l2y1PJXuNsC6R27Y4j65edhG4h-Q73tNA8PinKoip0vRcDgERkktClMos6Clo3WP6mpqvwKrrW2xlAIrKeBCtE_VjLohUFAf-S7FlYuxpYCky7Y0bEEVVn_NKFiPyyuKufAUg2LtKiatpuXkotTgBcBPpW3A6SE5Gbw92dv3214PvuGMV752wqC3lOcs5GEudCJcJDiPI5NFJjcmB0eIGyAXSWy4U8KlieE6M5lLMp1E26RTlIV9TGgqbMqYDnOX4sybqNwyFlqgsmliw572iL_8u6VpddCxHcdYgj-E8JDwyiXCQzIhrfDI65X9pFEA-aPlS0CPHJmhRNFu3ML50VSCa_JeonIesCOPvFiCS8JIxvCMKmw5n8kQdYgYquV45FEDttUNWQrMDUaSR9I1GK4M8IbrZ4rhRa0WHkdAmkXmkTcrwP7lOZ78u-lTchsPmqS8Z6RTTef2ObC0Su_Uqxs77aD8AcD9P08
linkProvider Unpaywall
linkToUnpaywall http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3bbtNAEF3RVAJeuF_MTQtCghcn8Xptrx-rhlAqtVSilYp4WO2ud9uQYFuOoxI-hm9lxnYCUUEgnnyb-Jaz2jOemTOEvHQ21Uxo61thQ58Hw6Gvho77EVcJN5aHTGFx8sFhvHfC90-j059ZlfbzWdHE7z8sc1XO7WCkajU4Go2bJYxLvv_2_QCMfCbg9P0yc1tkO46Ah_fI9snh0c5H7CaH8prDsGmb1q2naavYCDsZ_h6TupI-E30rNmakrbxyvyObl3Mmry3yUi0v1Gz2y4Q0vkk-rcp62jyUaX9R6775dlnl8T-e9Ra50fFUutMC6za5YvM75OpBF4m_S77vtg0M8zOq8oyuRMNhExgltShMocySFo42Parryn4FVtvYYikFVlLAieiIqjl1E6CgPvJdil8uZpYCkr50pWFLqrD6a07BelZcUMyFpxgU675i0roqyvNCgxcAt0q7gNM9cjx-c7y753e9HnzDGa997YRBbynLWMCDTOhYuFBwHoUmDU1mTAaOEDdALuLIcKeES2LDdWpSF6c6Du-TXl7k9iGhibAJYzrIXIIzb6wyy1hggcomsQ2G2iP-6u-WptNBx3YcMwn-EMJDwiuXCA_JhLTCI6_W9mWrAPJHyxeAHjk1E4mi3biE49NKgmvyTqJyHrAjjzxfgUvCSMbwjMptsZjLAHWIGKrleORBC7b1BVkCzA1GkkeSDRiuDfCCm0fyyXmjFh6FQJpF6pHXa8D-5Tke_bvpY3IdN9qkvCekV1cL-xRYWq2fdcPxB0rfPlo
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing+and+evaluating+the+efficacy+of+methotrexate+and+actinomycin+D+as+first-line+single+chemotherapy+agents+in+low+risk+gestational+trophoblastic+disease&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+gynecologic+oncology&rft.au=Lee%2C+Young+Jae&rft.au=Park%2C+Jeong+Yeol&rft.au=Kim%2C+Dae+Yeon&rft.au=Suh%2C+Dae+Shik&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.issn=2005-0399&rft.eissn=2005-0399&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e8&rft_id=info:doi/10.3802%2Fjgo.2017.28.e8&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2005-0380&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2005-0380&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2005-0380&client=summon