Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics
•Alternative metrics (altmetrics) are considered an interesting option for measuring broader impact of research.•Altmetrics is a term to describe web-based metrics for the impact of publications.•This overview of studies explores the potential of altmetrics for measuring societal impact.•The paper d...
Saved in:
| Published in | Journal of informetrics Vol. 8; no. 4; pp. 895 - 903 |
|---|---|
| Main Author | |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Oxford
Elsevier Ltd
01.10.2014
Elsevier Science Ltd |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 1751-1577 1875-5879 |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005 |
Cover
| Abstract | •Alternative metrics (altmetrics) are considered an interesting option for measuring broader impact of research.•Altmetrics is a term to describe web-based metrics for the impact of publications.•This overview of studies explores the potential of altmetrics for measuring societal impact.•The paper deals with the definition and classification of altmetrics.•Altmetrics benefits and disadvantages for measuring impact are discussed.
Today, it is not clear how the impact of research on other areas of society than science should be measured. While peer review and bibliometrics have become standard methods for measuring the impact of research in science, there is not yet an accepted framework within which to measure societal impact. Alternative metrics (called altmetrics to distinguish them from bibliometrics) are considered an interesting option for assessing the societal impact of research, as they offer new ways to measure (public) engagement with research output. Altmetrics is a term to describe web-based metrics for the impact of publications and other scholarly material by using data from social media platforms (e.g. Twitter or Mendeley). This overview of studies explores the potential of altmetrics for measuring societal impact. It deals with the definition and classification of altmetrics. Furthermore, their benefits and disadvantages for measuring impact are discussed. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | •Alternative metrics (altmetrics) are considered an interesting option for measuring broader impact of research.•Altmetrics is a term to describe web-based metrics for the impact of publications.•This overview of studies explores the potential of altmetrics for measuring societal impact.•The paper deals with the definition and classification of altmetrics.•Altmetrics benefits and disadvantages for measuring impact are discussed.
Today, it is not clear how the impact of research on other areas of society than science should be measured. While peer review and bibliometrics have become standard methods for measuring the impact of research in science, there is not yet an accepted framework within which to measure societal impact. Alternative metrics (called altmetrics to distinguish them from bibliometrics) are considered an interesting option for assessing the societal impact of research, as they offer new ways to measure (public) engagement with research output. Altmetrics is a term to describe web-based metrics for the impact of publications and other scholarly material by using data from social media platforms (e.g. Twitter or Mendeley). This overview of studies explores the potential of altmetrics for measuring societal impact. It deals with the definition and classification of altmetrics. Furthermore, their benefits and disadvantages for measuring impact are discussed. Today, it is not clear how the impact of research on other areas of society than science should be measured. While peer review and bibliometrics have become standard methods for measuring the impact of research in science, there is not yet an accepted framework within which to measure societal impact. Alternative metrics (called altmetrics to distinguish them from bibliometrics) are considered an interesting option for assessing the societal impact of research, as they offer new ways to measure (public) engagement with research output. Altmetrics is a term to describe web-based metrics for the impact of publications and other scholarly material by using data from social media platforms (e.g. Twitter or Mendeley). This overview of studies explores the potential of altmetrics for measuring societal impact. It deals with the definition and classification of altmetrics. Furthermore, their benefits and disadvantages for measuring impact are discussed. Today, it is not clear how the impact of research on other areas of society than science should be measured. While peer review and bibliometrics have become standard methods for measuring the impact of research in science, there is not yet an accepted framework within which to measure societal impact. Alternative metrics (called altmetrics to distinguish them from bibliometrics) are considered an interesting option for assessing the societal impact of research, as they offer new ways to measure (public) engagement with research output. Altmetrics is a term to describe web-based metrics for the impact of publications and other scholarly material by using data from social media platforms (e.g. Twitter or Mendeley). This overview of studies explores the potential of altmetrics for measuring societal impact. It deals with the definition and classification of altmetrics. Furthermore, their benefits and disadvantages for measuring impact are discussed. [Copyright Elsevier B.V.] |
| Author | Bornmann, Lutz |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Lutz orcidid: 0000-0003-0810-7091 surname: Bornmann fullname: Bornmann, Lutz email: bornmann@gv.mpg.de organization: Division for Science and Innovation Studies, Administrative Headquarters of the Max Planck Society, Hofgartenstr. 8, 80539 Munich, Germany |
| BookMark | eNp9kcFq3DAQhkVIoJukD9CboJde7Ei2Jdn0UELSpIVAL8lZjOVRVsYrbSXtlrx9tWwhEGhOGpjvGw3_nJNTHzwS8omzmjMur-Z6Dq5uGO9qNtSMiROy4r0SlejVcFpqJXjFhVIfyHlKcwGk5MOK-NtAYckbzNGZRLfB-UxzoHmNdIwBJozUbbZgMg2WRkwI0ay_0WtPwx7j3uGfQ2NEj9blRMFPdHIJpj34DM-YDt3XDy7JmYUl4cd_7wV5uvv-ePOjevh1__Pm-qEyXdPlChozlEIBNMhGiwDWjNb2AhXrZCtwVEIO_WjVAK3oe2iRSWY6aK1qkLP2gnw5zt3G8HuHKeuNSwaXBTyGXdJctUK2vWh5QT-_Qeewi75sp7mUgktewiqUOlImhpQiWm1chuyCzxHcojnThzvoudhOH-6g2aCPJn9jbqPbQHx51_l6dLBkVDKOOhmH3uDkIpqsp8L_3_4L7NSjgA |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s11229_022_03546_9 crossref_primary_10_1093_reseval_rvab008 crossref_primary_10_2196_64679 crossref_primary_10_36535_0203_6460_2019_03_1 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3258177 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joi_2016_10_003 crossref_primary_10_3233_JAD_200355 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12109_016_9463_6 crossref_primary_10_1002_leap_1043 crossref_primary_10_1080_10511253_2024_2389096 crossref_primary_10_1093_scipol_scy024 crossref_primary_10_2196_jmir_8954 crossref_primary_10_3389_frma_2016_00006 crossref_primary_10_1002_wom3_14 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_016_1887_4 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_024_05061_9 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_015_1822_0 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_022_04456_w crossref_primary_10_1093_conphys_coac015 crossref_primary_10_1111_joes_12369 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejor_2015_04_002 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12967_024_05557_1 crossref_primary_10_12688_f1000research_6517_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_021_03954_7 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_016_2118_8 crossref_primary_10_5465_amp_2023_0198 crossref_primary_10_1002_nadc_20174066142 crossref_primary_10_36702_pb_457 crossref_primary_10_3390_su14053034 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wneu_2017_04_157 crossref_primary_10_1108_PMM_01_2023_0001 crossref_primary_10_18438_eblip30407 crossref_primary_10_1057_s41307_023_00337_w crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joi_2020_101120 crossref_primary_10_1108_PMM_02_2016_0006 crossref_primary_10_1002_fsh_10536 crossref_primary_10_1002_pra2_935 crossref_primary_10_30578_nomadas_n50a2 crossref_primary_10_1177_0961000617742461 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_019_03088_x crossref_primary_10_1080_2000656X_2020_1858842 crossref_primary_10_1162_qss_a_00168 crossref_primary_10_1177_01655515211043713 crossref_primary_10_1108_AJIM_06_2018_0152 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12109_019_09679_z crossref_primary_10_1057_s41599_021_00891_x crossref_primary_10_1097_PRS_0000000000004618 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_arthro_2020_09_015 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jham_2024_100161 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0234347 crossref_primary_10_1162_qss_a_00043 crossref_primary_10_2308_isys_51981 crossref_primary_10_1097_MRR_0000000000000356 crossref_primary_10_3233_JIFS_169495 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10639_022_11058_9 crossref_primary_10_1080_2050571X_2021_1926626 crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare9091113 crossref_primary_10_1177_0963662518761733 crossref_primary_10_7554_eLife_42254 crossref_primary_10_1080_02691728_2021_1919237 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ciresp_2021_01_013 crossref_primary_10_1139_er_2020_0045 crossref_primary_10_1002_aqc_3725 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_020_03612_4 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41415_019_0212_z crossref_primary_10_2106_JBJS_20_00610 crossref_primary_10_1080_13032917_2024_2446202 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_020_03415_7 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_018_2698_6 crossref_primary_10_29024_joa_5 crossref_primary_10_1093_scipol_scz001 crossref_primary_10_1590_1982_7849rac2015150213 crossref_primary_10_1108_AJIM_09_2014_0115 crossref_primary_10_2964_jsik_2017_009 crossref_primary_10_1002_he_20459 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_019_03052_9 crossref_primary_10_1093_reseval_rvx005 crossref_primary_10_1162_qss_a_00032 crossref_primary_10_3998_jep_788 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_017_2279_0 crossref_primary_10_1111_ibi_12403 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10639_023_11754_0 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_021_04217_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_020_03491_9 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40200_021_00758_7 crossref_primary_10_3389_frma_2017_00011 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joi_2015_11_003 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_024_05006_2 crossref_primary_10_1108_DLP_01_2017_0005 crossref_primary_10_17821_srels_2021_v58i3_158132 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joi_2016_03_005 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10755_022_09636_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joi_2019_03_008 crossref_primary_10_1108_DLP_01_2017_0002 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_024_05157_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_017_2539_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_datak_2021_101926 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_015_1745_9 crossref_primary_10_1002_wom3_4 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_022_04574_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joi_2024_101573 crossref_primary_10_1002_leap_1403 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joi_2024_101572 crossref_primary_10_1108_GKMC_07_2022_0166 crossref_primary_10_36850_4m4z_8784 crossref_primary_10_3399_bjgp16X683353 crossref_primary_10_1080_09737766_2016_1260815 crossref_primary_10_1108_LHT_03_2019_0067 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_022_04548_7 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_019_03159_z crossref_primary_10_1177_14673584221105007 crossref_primary_10_3145_epi_2021_mar_14 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_020_03703_2 crossref_primary_10_1080_00048623_2014_1003174 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2932944 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_022_04502_7 crossref_primary_10_1093_scipol_scz027 crossref_primary_10_1002_sd_3214 crossref_primary_10_3897_subtbiol_51_139954 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joi_2022_101323 crossref_primary_10_1002_asi_24344 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joi_2024_101562 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0175368 crossref_primary_10_2964_jsik_2023_028 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_017_2581_x crossref_primary_10_1098_rstb_2020_0409 crossref_primary_10_1108_AJIM_02_2022_0091 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_023_04645_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joi_2018_07_005 crossref_primary_10_1093_femsle_fnz075 crossref_primary_10_7717_peerj_cs_32 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_020_03424_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_msard_2019_101862 crossref_primary_10_4000_hrc_6388 crossref_primary_10_1111_jcal_12962 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joi_2018_06_001 crossref_primary_10_1111_cts_13067 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0231305 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acalib_2024_102984 crossref_primary_10_1002_asi_24932 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_020_03803_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joi_2023_101396 crossref_primary_10_19132_1808_5245273_275_302 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_021_04228_y crossref_primary_10_1108_LHT_04_2019_0091 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joi_2024_101592 crossref_primary_10_1002_asi_23728 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41415_022_4558_2 crossref_primary_10_1002_pra2_69 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_022_04470_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcrc_2018_09_033 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_evalprogplan_2022_102157 crossref_primary_10_1097_GOX_0000000000005352 crossref_primary_10_1097_IJG_0000000000001939 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_021_03979_y crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4402966 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_021_04171_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joi_2022_101306 crossref_primary_10_1080_02642069_2024_2369322 crossref_primary_10_1177_01655515211039665 crossref_primary_10_1080_0142159X_2022_2102471 crossref_primary_10_1002_asi_24124 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_023_04888_y crossref_primary_10_7717_peerj_4564 crossref_primary_10_1111_joes_12415 crossref_primary_10_1002_asi_23833 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_016_2086_z crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_018_2669_y crossref_primary_10_3389_frma_2018_00029 crossref_primary_10_1093_annonc_mdw614 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joi_2017_02_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2022_104067 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11135_018_0797_3 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13643_024_02557_6 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41415_023_6664_1 crossref_primary_10_1108_AJIM_12_2014_0173 crossref_primary_10_20396_rdbci_v16i2_8650461 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0197133 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0254006 crossref_primary_10_1097_BCO_0000000000000788 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joi_2020_101097 crossref_primary_10_1002_asi_24830 crossref_primary_10_1590_1982_7849rac2015140135 crossref_primary_10_12688_hrbopenres_13895_2 crossref_primary_10_1002_asi_24950 crossref_primary_10_12688_hrbopenres_13895_1 crossref_primary_10_12688_hrbopenres_13895_3 crossref_primary_10_1108_GKMC_03_2018_0025 crossref_primary_10_1109_TEM_2020_2994049 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_asmr_2024_100974 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10792_023_02652_y crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_018_2657_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s41060_022_00345_w crossref_primary_10_29024_sar_13 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_016_2115_y crossref_primary_10_1177_10439862231170971 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0173152 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joi_2024_101520 crossref_primary_10_1177_1071181320641126 crossref_primary_10_1177_0363546520903703 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joi_2016_04_015 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joi_2021_101142 crossref_primary_10_1097_BSD_0000000000000531 crossref_primary_10_1177_20539517231180577 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_024_05077_1 crossref_primary_10_5334_cstp_152 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_018_2876_6 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_017_2373_3 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0165997 crossref_primary_10_1162_qss_a_00204 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acalib_2023_102746 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_egyr_2022_07_058 crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0043_1761178 crossref_primary_10_1108_JIC_02_2020_0057 crossref_primary_10_3928_01477447_20221024_02 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bjao_2021_100001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joi_2021_101158 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_016_1978_2 crossref_primary_10_1057_s41304_018_0174_7 crossref_primary_10_1108_LHT_01_2023_0022 crossref_primary_10_1093_reseval_rvz033 crossref_primary_10_18553_jmcp_2018_24_8_778 crossref_primary_10_33186_1027_3689_2024_2_123_141 crossref_primary_10_1053_j_jfas_2024_11_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joi_2018_08_008 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joi_2021_101153 crossref_primary_10_1177_1077800418806593 crossref_primary_10_1057_s41599_020_00647_z crossref_primary_10_1002_pra2_27 crossref_primary_10_1177_02666669251325499 crossref_primary_10_2478_jdis_2025_0012 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_21762 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2848560 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joi_2024_101540 crossref_primary_10_1002_asi_23990 crossref_primary_10_1093_reseval_rvac031 crossref_primary_10_1515_iwp_2017_0035 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joi_2018_01_010 crossref_primary_10_3389_frma_2023_1188131 crossref_primary_10_4103_ija_ija_1058_21 crossref_primary_10_1002_jac5_1141 crossref_primary_10_47316_cajmhe_2024_5_3_07 crossref_primary_10_1111_acfi_12714 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_020_03698_w crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cireng_2021_01_019 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_019_03251_4 crossref_primary_10_1108_GKMC_02_2024_0083 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_021_04141_4 crossref_primary_10_2964_jsik_2024_002 crossref_primary_10_1177_01655515231202762 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_019_03044_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joi_2023_101452 crossref_primary_10_1108_OIR_09_2022_0502 crossref_primary_10_1177_1077800420938117 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joi_2021_101175 crossref_primary_10_1177_16094069211052189 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acalib_2015_06_005 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10462_023_10548_7 crossref_primary_10_3390_app11199288 crossref_primary_10_1097_ACM_0000000000001897 crossref_primary_10_1108_OIR_11_2019_0364 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_018_2697_7 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_021_04152_1 crossref_primary_10_3390_publications10040049 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_019_03203_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_arthro_2025_02_018 crossref_primary_10_1080_00336297_2016_1184171 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joi_2022_101288 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_020_03564_9 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0192290 crossref_primary_10_1108_OIR_01_2016_0012 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_023_04867_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_peh_2015_11_006 crossref_primary_10_1098_rsos_171371 crossref_primary_10_1108_LHT_12_2019_0239 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_024_04939_y crossref_primary_10_5811_westjem_2019_10_44484 crossref_primary_10_52547_jipm_37_1_305 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0263725 crossref_primary_10_1162_qss_a_00243 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_023_04709_2 crossref_primary_10_1108_GKMC_11_2020_0179 crossref_primary_10_1108_PMM_08_2016_0036 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_020_03712_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_020_03345_4 crossref_primary_10_1111_nicc_12925 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_021_04112_9 crossref_primary_10_1177_02537176211028988 crossref_primary_10_1002_j_1681_4835_2017_tb00572_x crossref_primary_10_1108_OIR_02_2016_0058 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0152637 crossref_primary_10_1080_14479338_2020_1825090 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12109_016_9485_0 crossref_primary_10_2964_jsik_2019_035 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_020_03405_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ipm_2022_102945 crossref_primary_10_1155_2020_8787394 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10755_023_09648_7 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41562_023_01562_4 crossref_primary_10_1108_GKMC_04_2024_0200 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_020_03478_6 crossref_primary_10_1002_ir_20267 crossref_primary_10_1177_01655515211059772 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_018_2828_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joi_2018_04_001 crossref_primary_10_1080_1097198X_2020_1817684 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_020_03539_w crossref_primary_10_1111_rssa_12124 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_016_2077_0 crossref_primary_10_1111_1745_9133_12604 crossref_primary_10_1093_reseval_rvv028 crossref_primary_10_3389_frma_2021_696470 crossref_primary_10_1108_AJIM_11_2014_0152 crossref_primary_10_5433_1981_8920_2021v26n2p596 crossref_primary_10_1007_S40037_018_0438_5 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_018_2964_7 crossref_primary_10_1177_0165551520945853 crossref_primary_10_1177_10439862231170949 crossref_primary_10_1080_13032917_2020_1740285 crossref_primary_10_1093_scipol_scab082 crossref_primary_10_47909_ijsmc_11 crossref_primary_10_1080_13614533_2017_1318765 crossref_primary_10_1002_pds_4401 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0316890 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_016_1893_6 |
| Cites_doi | 10.2196/jmir.2707 10.1111/bjet.12150 10.1016/j.joi.2013.02.005 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000242 10.1002/asi.23040 10.2196/jmir.2012 10.1002/asi.23073 10.1503/cmaj.090016 10.1002/asi.22803 10.1002/aris.2010.1440440108 10.1007/s11192-013-1117-2 10.3789/isqv25no2.2013.04 10.1087/20130103 10.3789/isqv25no2.2013.02 10.1002/asi.23071 10.1080/03632415.2013.816289 10.1002/meet.14504901305 10.1002/asi.23101 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001687 10.1371/journal.pone.0064841 10.1002/asi.23041 10.1007/s11192-011-0580-x 10.1007/s11192-008-0220-2 10.1038/493159a 10.5210/fm.v15i7.2874 10.5860/crln.73.10.8846 10.1002/asi.23056 10.1007/s11192-012-0775-9 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001535 10.3789/isqv25no2.2013.03 10.3916/C41-2013-05 10.1038/embor.2012.99 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.02.005 10.1016/j.joi.2012.10.001 10.1108/00220410810844150 10.1002/asi.20584 10.1002/bult.2013.1720390405 10.3789/isqv25no2.2013.05 10.1007/s11192-013-0993-9 10.1002/asi.23037 10.1002/bult.2013.1720390408 10.1371/journal.pone.0050109 10.1080/0194262X.2013.829762 10.3789/isqv25no2.2013.06 10.1002/asi.23239 10.1002/bult.2013.1720390410 10.5210/fm.v17i11.4110 10.3789/isqv25no2.2013.01 10.1002/asi.20199 10.1002/aris.2011.1440450112 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2014 Elsevier Ltd |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2014 Elsevier Ltd |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION E3H F2A 8BP |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA) Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA) Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA) - CILIP Edition |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA) Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA) - CILIP Edition |
| DatabaseTitleList | Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA) Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA) - CILIP Edition |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Library & Information Science |
| EISSN | 1875-5879 |
| EndPage | 903 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 10_1016_j_joi_2014_09_005 S1751157714000868 |
| GroupedDBID | --K --M .DC .~1 0R~ 1B1 1~. 1~5 4.4 457 4G. 5GY 5VS 7-5 71M 8P~ AAAKF AACTN AAEDT AAEDW AAFJI AAIAV AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AARIN AAXUO AAYFN ABBOA ABFNM ABFRF ABJNI ABMAC ABMMH ABUCO ABXDB ABYKQ ACDAQ ACGFO ACGFS ACHQT ACNNM ACRLP ACZNC ADBBV ADEZE ADMUD AEBSH AEFWE AEKER AFKWA AFTJW AGHFR AGUBO AGYEJ AHZHX AIALX AIEXJ AIKHN AITUG AJBFU AJOXV AKYCK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMFUW AMRAJ AOMHK AOUOD APLSM AVARZ AXJTR BKOJK BLXMC CS3 DU5 EBS EFJIC EFLBG EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 F5P FDB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-Q GBLVA GBOLZ HAMUX HZ~ IHE J1W KOM M41 MO0 N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. PRBVW Q38 RIG ROL RPZ SDF SDG SES SPC SPCBC SSB SSD SSO SSV SSZ T5K UNMZH ~G- AATTM AAXKI AAYWO AAYXX ABWVN ACRPL ACVFH ADCNI ADNMO AEIPS AEUPX AFJKZ AFPUW AFXIZ AGCQF AGRNS AIGII AIIUN AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ANKPU APXCP BNPGV CITATION SSH E3H EFKBS F2A 8BP |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-a2c94247aa2e0bfeaafcbff85e704635eb75698bf79a3588a3e060c4a3f72e103 |
| IEDL.DBID | AIKHN |
| ISSN | 1751-1577 |
| IngestDate | Fri Sep 05 09:33:40 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 03:45:33 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:03:26 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:47:41 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:29:20 EST 2024 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 4 |
| Keywords | Scientometrics Broader impact Societal impact Altmetrics |
| Language | English |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c424t-a2c94247aa2e0bfeaafcbff85e704635eb75698bf79a3588a3e060c4a3f72e103 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-0810-7091 |
| PQID | 1665161005 |
| PQPubID | 2035527 |
| PageCount | 9 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1735638531 proquest_journals_1665161005 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_joi_2014_09_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joi_2014_09_005 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_joi_2014_09_005 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | October 2014 2014-10-00 20141001 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2014-10-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 10 year: 2014 text: October 2014 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | Oxford |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Oxford |
| PublicationTitle | Journal of informetrics |
| PublicationYear | 2014 |
| Publisher | Elsevier Ltd Elsevier Science Ltd |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Ltd – name: Elsevier Science Ltd |
| References | Priem, Piwowar, Hemminger (bib0275) 2012 Vinkler (bib0360) 2010 Neylon, Willmers, King (bib0235) 2014 Weller, Dröge, Puschmann (bib0375) 2011 Rousseau, Ye (bib0305) 2013; 58 Rodgers, Barbrow (bib0290) 2013 Eysenbach (bib0095) 2011; 13 Taylor (bib0325) 2013; 25 Piwowar (bib0250) 2013; 493 Weller, Peters (bib0380) 2012 Claussen, Cooney, Defilippi, Fox, Glaser, Hawkes (bib0075) 2013; 38 Haustein (bib0145) 2014 Liu, Xu, Wu, Chen, Guo (bib0200) 2013; 15 Galloway, Pease, Rauh (bib0120) 2013; 32 Vaughan, Shaw (bib0355) 2008; 74 Thelwall, Haustein, Lariviere, Sugimoto (bib0340) 2013; 8 Adie (bib0005) 2014 Fenner (bib0110) 2013; 11 Bornmann (bib0035) 2011; 45 Thelwall (bib0335) 2014 American Psychological Association (bib0015) 2010 Bornmann, Leydesdorff, Mutz (bib0060) 2013; 7 Hammarfelt (bib0140) 2014 Fenner (bib0105) 2013; 25 Neylon, Wu (bib0240) 2009; 7 Delgado López-Cózar, Robinson-García, Torres-Salinas (bib0090) 2014; 65 Roemer, Borchardt (bib0300) 2013; 25 Wouters, Costas (bib0385) 2012 Haustein, Peters, Bar-Ilan, Priem, Shema, Terliesner (bib0155) 2014 . Sud, Thelwall (bib0320) 2014; 98 Bar-Ilan, Shema, Thelwall (bib0020) 2014 Bornmann (bib0045) 2013; 64 Bornmann (bib0040) 2012; 13 Peters, Beutelspacher, Maghferat, Terliesner (bib0245) 2012; 49 Piwowar, Priem (bib0255) 2013; 39 Priem (bib0260) 2014 Fausto, Machado, Bento, Iamarino, Nahas, Munger (bib0100) 2012; 7 Gibbons, Limoges, Nowotny, Schwartzman, Scott, Trow (bib0125) 1994 Haustein, Peters, Sugimoto, Thelwall, Larivière (bib0160) 2014; 65 National Information Standards Organization (bib0230) 2014 Bornmann, Daniel (bib0055) 2008; 64 Vaughan, Shaw (bib0350) 2005; 56 Bornmann, Williams (bib0065) 2013; 7 Torres-Salinas, Cabezas-Clavijo, Jimenez-Contreras (bib0345) 2013; 41 Holmberg, Thelwall (bib0165) 2014 Gunn (bib0135) 2013; 25 King, Ramirez-Cano, Greaves, Vlaev, Beales, Darzi (bib0170) 2013; 110 Liu, Adie (bib0205) 2013; 39 Kousha, Thelwall (bib0180) 2007; 58 Taylor (bib0330) 2013 Li, Thelwall, Giustini (bib0190) 2012; 91 Shema, Bar-Ilan, Thelwall (bib0315) 2014 Mohammadi, Thelwall (bib0215) 2013; 97 Bik, Goldstein (bib0030) 2013; 11 Bornmann (bib0050) 2014; 65 Puschmann (bib0285) 2014 Lin, Fenner (bib0195) 2013; 25 Shema, Bar-Ilan, Thelwall (bib0310) 2014; 65 Bastow, Dunleavy, Tinkler (bib0025) 2014 Maflahi, N., & Thelwall, M. (in press). When are readers as good as citers for bibliometrics? Scopus vs. Mendeley for LIS journals. Cronin (bib0080) 2013; 64 Adie, Roe (bib0010) 2013; 26 Roemer, Borchardt (bib0295) 2012; 73 Priem, Parra, Piwowar, Waagmeester (bib0270) 2011 Mohammadi, Thelwall (bib0220) 2014; 65 Priem, Taraborelli, Groth, Neylon (bib0280) 2010 Chamberlain (bib0070) 2013; 25 Greenhow, Gleason (bib0130) 2014; 45 Kurtz, Bollen (bib0185) 2010; 44 Konkiel, Scherer (bib0175) 2013; 39 Zahedi, Costas, Wouters (bib0390) 2014 Wang (bib0370) 2013; 94 Haustein, Peters (bib0150) 2012; 17 Frank, Nason (bib0115) 2009; 180 Priem, Hemminger (bib0265) 2010; 15. Darling, Shiffman, Côté, Drew (bib0085) 2013; 1 Waltman, Costas (bib0365) 2014; 65 Mohammadi, Thelwall, Haustein, Larivière (bib0225) 2014 Roemer (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0295) 2012; 73 Haustein (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0150) 2012; 17 Bornmann (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0035) 2011; 45 Lin (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0195) 2013; 25 Eysenbach (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0095) 2011; 13 Vaughan (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0350) 2005; 56 Taylor (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0330) 2013 Thelwall (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0340) 2013; 8 Vinkler (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0360) 2010 Rodgers (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0290) 2013 Fenner (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0105) 2013; 25 Kurtz (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0185) 2010; 44 Bornmann (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0040) 2012; 13 King (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0170) 2013; 110 Weller (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0380) 2012 Adie (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0005) 2014 Liu (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0205) 2013; 39 Wouters (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0385) 2012 Liu (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0200) 2013; 15 American Psychological Association (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0015) 2010 Peters (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0245) 2012; 49 Weller (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0375) 2011 Piwowar (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0250) 2013; 493 Bornmann (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0050) 2014; 65 Piwowar (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0255) 2013; 39 Bastow (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0025) 2014 Shema (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0315) 2014 Puschmann (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0285) 2014 Gunn (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0135) 2013; 25 Darling (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0085) 2013; 1 Priem (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0280) 2010 Frank (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0115) 2009; 180 Sud (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0320) 2014; 98 Claussen (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0075) 2013; 38 Bornmann (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0045) 2013; 64 Bik (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0030) 2013; 11 Mohammadi (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0225) 2014 Priem (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0275) 2012 Priem (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0260) 2014 Haustein (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0145) 2014 Fausto (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0100) 2012; 7 Bar-Ilan (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0020) 2014 Mohammadi (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0220) 2014; 65 Bornmann (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0055) 2008; 64 Mohammadi (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0215) 2013; 97 Neylon (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0240) 2009; 7 Haustein (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0160) 2014; 65 Gibbons (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0125) 1994 Greenhow (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0130) 2014; 45 Torres-Salinas (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0345) 2013; 41 Chamberlain (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0070) 2013; 25 Taylor (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0325) 2013; 25 Hammarfelt (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0140) 2014 Neylon (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0235) 2014 Adie (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0010) 2013; 26 Bornmann (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0065) 2013; 7 Thelwall (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0335) 2014 Galloway (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0120) 2013; 32 Cronin (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0080) 2013; 64 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0210 Shema (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0310) 2014; 65 Roemer (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0300) 2013; 25 Wang (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0370) 2013; 94 Kousha (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0180) 2007; 58 Li (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0190) 2012; 91 Vaughan (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0355) 2008; 74 Waltman (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0365) 2014; 65 Priem (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0265) 2010; 15. Fenner (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0110) 2013; 11 Holmberg (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0165) 2014 Konkiel (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0175) 2013; 39 Priem (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0270) 2011 National Information Standards Organization (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0230) 2014 Rousseau (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0305) 2013; 58 Zahedi (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0390) 2014 Delgado López-Cózar (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0090) 2014; 65 Bornmann (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0060) 2013; 7 Haustein (10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0155) 2014 |
| References_xml | – volume: 45 start-page: 392 year: 2014 end-page: 402 ident: bib0130 article-title: Social scholarship: Reconsidering scholarly practices in the age of social media publication-title: British Journal of Educational Technology – year: 2014 ident: bib0225 article-title: Who reads research articles? An altmetrics analysis of mendeley user categories1 – volume: 74 start-page: 317 year: 2008 end-page: 330 ident: bib0355 article-title: A new look at evidence of scholarly citation in citation indexes and from web sources publication-title: Scientometrics – volume: 39 start-page: 22 year: 2013 end-page: 26 ident: bib0175 article-title: New opportunities for repositories in the age of altmetrics publication-title: Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology – year: 2011 ident: bib0270 article-title: Uncovering impacts: CitedIn and total-impact, two new tools for gathering altmetrics publication-title: Paper presented at the iConference 2012 – year: 2014 ident: bib0315 article-title: How is research blogged? A content analysis approach publication-title: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology – volume: 32 start-page: 335 year: 2013 end-page: 345 ident: bib0120 article-title: Introduction to altmetrics for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) Librarians publication-title: Science & Technology Libraries – year: 2010 ident: bib0280 article-title: Altmetrics: A manifesto – year: 2012 ident: bib0385 article-title: Users, narcissism and control – tracking the impact of scholarly publications in the 21st century – volume: 38 start-page: 359 year: 2013 end-page: 362 ident: bib0075 article-title: Science communication in a digital age: Social media and the American fisheries society publication-title: Fisheries – volume: 25 start-page: 33 year: 2013 end-page: 39 ident: bib0135 article-title: Social Signals reflect academic impact: What it means when a scholar adds a paper to Mendeley publication-title: Information Standards Quarterly – year: 2012 ident: bib0275 article-title: Altmetrics in the wild: Using social media to explore scholarly impact – volume: 25 start-page: 4 year: 2013 end-page: 13 ident: bib0070 article-title: Consuming article-level metrics: Observations and lessons publication-title: Information Standards Quarterly – volume: 65 start-page: 647 year: 2014 end-page: 648 ident: bib0050 article-title: Is there currently a scientific revolution in scientometrics? publication-title: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology – start-page: 1 year: 2014 end-page: 16 ident: bib0165 article-title: Disciplinary differences in Twitter scholarly communication publication-title: Scientometrics – year: 2014 ident: bib0025 article-title: The impact of the social sciences – year: 1994 ident: bib0125 article-title: The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies – volume: 39 start-page: 10 year: 2013 end-page: 13 ident: bib0255 article-title: The power of altmetrics on a CV publication-title: Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology – volume: 65 start-page: 433 year: 2014 end-page: 445 ident: bib0365 article-title: F1000 recommendations as a potential new data source for research evaluation: A Comparison with citations publication-title: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology – volume: 15. year: 2010 ident: bib0265 article-title: Scientometrics 2.0: Toward new metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web publication-title: First Monday – volume: 64 start-page: 217 year: 2013 end-page: 233 ident: bib0045 article-title: What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? A literature survey publication-title: Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology – start-page: 1 year: 2014 end-page: 19 ident: bib0155 article-title: Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community publication-title: Scientometrics – year: 2014 ident: bib0260 article-title: Altmetrics publication-title: Beyond bibliometrics: Harnessing multi-dimensional indicators of performance. – volume: 98 start-page: 1131 year: 2014 end-page: 1143 ident: bib0320 article-title: Evaluating altmetrics publication-title: Scientometrics – start-page: 1 year: 2014 end-page: 12 ident: bib0140 article-title: Using altmetrics for assessing research impact in the humanities publication-title: Scientometrics – start-page: 19 year: 2013 end-page: 22 ident: bib0330 article-title: Towards a common model of citation: Some thoughts on merging altmetrics and bibliometrics publication-title: Research Trends – start-page: 209 year: 2012 end-page: 222 ident: bib0380 article-title: Citations in Web 2. 0 publication-title: Science and the Internet – volume: 49 start-page: 1 year: 2012 end-page: 4 ident: bib0245 article-title: Scientific bloggers under the altmetric microscope publication-title: Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology – year: 2014 ident: bib0230 article-title: Altmetrics standards project white paper – volume: 25 start-page: 20 year: 2013 end-page: 26 ident: bib0195 article-title: Altmetrics in evolution: Defining and redefining the ontology of article-level metrics publication-title: Information Standards Quarterly – volume: 97 start-page: 383 year: 2013 end-page: 395 ident: bib0215 article-title: Assessing non-standard article impact using F1000 labels publication-title: Scientometrics – volume: 65 start-page: 1018 year: 2014 end-page: 1027 ident: bib0310 article-title: Do blog citations correlate with a higher number of future citations? Research blogs as a potential source for alternative metrics publication-title: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology – volume: 8 year: 2013 ident: bib0340 article-title: Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services publication-title: PLoS ONE – reference: Maflahi, N., & Thelwall, M. (in press). When are readers as good as citers for bibliometrics? Scopus vs. Mendeley for LIS journals. – volume: 44 start-page: 3 year: 2010 end-page: 64 ident: bib0185 article-title: Usage Bibliometrics publication-title: Annual Review of Information Science and Technology – year: 2010 ident: bib0360 article-title: The evaluation of research by scientometric indicators – volume: 493 start-page: 159 year: 2013 ident: bib0250 article-title: Altmetrics: Value all research products publication-title: Nature – volume: 65 start-page: 656 year: 2014 end-page: 669 ident: bib0160 article-title: Tweeting biomedicine: An analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature publication-title: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology – year: 2014 ident: bib0235 article-title: Rethinking impact: Applying altmetrics to southern African research – volume: 39 start-page: 31 year: 2013 end-page: 34 ident: bib0205 article-title: Five challenges in altmetrics: A toolmaker's perspective publication-title: Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology – volume: 26 start-page: 11 year: 2013 end-page: 17 ident: bib0010 article-title: Altmetric: Enriching scholarly content with article-level discussion and metrics publication-title: Learned Publishing – start-page: 307 year: 2014 end-page: 325 ident: bib0020 article-title: Bibliographic references in: Web 2.0 publication-title: Beyond bibliometrics: Harnessing multi-dimensional indicators of performance – volume: 17 year: 2012 ident: bib0150 article-title: Using social bookmarks and tags as alternative indicators of journal content description publication-title: First Monday – volume: 15 start-page: 17 year: 2013 ident: bib0200 article-title: Correlation and interaction visualization of altmetric indicators extracted from scholarly social network activities: Dimensions and structure publication-title: Journal of Medical Internet Research – start-page: 1 year: 2014 end-page: 23 ident: bib0390 article-title: How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications publication-title: Scientometrics – volume: 65 start-page: 446 year: 2014 end-page: 454 ident: bib0090 article-title: The Google scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators publication-title: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology – volume: 11 start-page: e1001535 year: 2013 ident: bib0030 article-title: An Introduction to social media for scientists publication-title: PLoS Biology – start-page: 23 year: 2014 end-page: 25 ident: bib0005 article-title: The grey literature from an altmetrics perspective – opportunity and challenges publication-title: Research Trends – volume: 94 start-page: 851 year: 2013 end-page: 872 ident: bib0370 article-title: Citation time window choice for research impact evaluation publication-title: Scientometrics – volume: 110 start-page: 291 year: 2013 end-page: 297 ident: bib0170 article-title: Twitter and the health reforms in the English National Health Service publication-title: Health Policy – volume: 45 start-page: 199 year: 2011 end-page: 245 ident: bib0035 article-title: Scientific peer review publication-title: Annual Review of Information Science and Technology – volume: 56 start-page: 1075 year: 2005 end-page: 1087 ident: bib0350 article-title: Web citation data for impact assessment: A comparison of four science disciplines publication-title: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology – volume: 13 start-page: 673 year: 2012 end-page: 676 ident: bib0040 article-title: Measuring the societal impact of research publication-title: EMBO Reports – volume: 7 start-page: 158 year: 2013 end-page: 165 ident: bib0060 article-title: The use of percentiles and percentile rank classes in the analysis of bibliometric data: Opportunities and limits publication-title: Journal of Informetrics – volume: 58 year: 2013 ident: bib0305 article-title: A multi-metric approach for research evaluation publication-title: Chinese Science Bulletin – volume: 64 start-page: 1523 year: 2013 end-page: 1525 ident: bib0080 article-title: The evolving indicator space (iSpace) publication-title: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology – volume: 73 start-page: 596 year: 2012 end-page: 600 ident: bib0295 article-title: From bibliometrics to altmetrics: A changing scholarly landscape publication-title: College & Research Libraries News – volume: 7 year: 2009 ident: bib0240 article-title: Article-level metrics and the evolution of scientific impact publication-title: Plos Biology – volume: 180 start-page: 528 year: 2009 end-page: 534 ident: bib0115 article-title: Health research: Measuring the social, health and economic benefits publication-title: Canadian Medical Association Journal – volume: 25 start-page: 3 year: 2013 ident: bib0105 article-title: Letter from the guest content editor: Altmetrics have come of age publication-title: Information Standards Quarterly – volume: 58 start-page: 1055 year: 2007 end-page: 1065 ident: bib0180 article-title: Google Scholar citations and Google Web/URL citations: A multi-discipline exploratory analysis publication-title: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology – volume: 65 start-page: 1627 year: 2014 end-page: 1638 ident: bib0220 article-title: Mendeley readership altmetrics for the social sciences and humanities: Research evaluation and knowledge flows publication-title: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology – year: 2013 ident: bib0290 article-title: A look at altmetrics and its growing significance to research libraries – volume: 25 start-page: 27 year: 2013 end-page: 32 ident: bib0325 article-title: Exploring the boundaries: How altmetrics can expand our vision of scholarly communication and social impact publication-title: Information Standards Quarterly – start-page: 327 year: 2014 end-page: 344 ident: bib0145 article-title: Readership metrics publication-title: Beyond bibliometrics: Harnessing multi-dimensional indicators of performance – volume: 13 start-page: e123 year: 2011 ident: bib0095 article-title: Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact publication-title: J Med Internet Res – volume: 7 start-page: 562 year: 2013 end-page: 574 ident: bib0065 article-title: How to calculate the practical significance of citation impact differences? An empirical example from evaluative institutional bibliometrics using adjusted predictions and marginal effects publication-title: Journal of Informetrics – volume: 1 start-page: e16v11 year: 2013 ident: bib0085 article-title: The role of Twitter in the life cycle of a scientific publication publication-title: PeerJ PrePrints – volume: 41 start-page: 53 year: 2013 end-page: 60 ident: bib0345 article-title: Altmetrics: New indicators for scientific communication in Web 2.0 publication-title: Comunicar – reference: . – start-page: 3 year: 2014 end-page: 4 ident: bib0335 article-title: A brief history of altmetrics publication-title: Research Trends – volume: 64 start-page: 45 year: 2008 end-page: 80 ident: bib0055 article-title: What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior publication-title: Journal of Documentation – volume: 11 start-page: e1001687 year: 2013 ident: bib0110 article-title: What can article-level metrics do for you? publication-title: PLoS Biol – volume: 91 start-page: 461 year: 2012 end-page: 471 ident: bib0190 article-title: Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement publication-title: Scientometrics – start-page: 89 year: 2014 end-page: 106 ident: bib0285 article-title: (Micro)blogging science? Notes on potentials and constraints of new forms of scholarly communication publication-title: Opening science – year: 2010 ident: bib0015 article-title: Publication manual of the American Psychological Association – volume: 7 start-page: e50109 year: 2012 ident: bib0100 article-title: Research blogging: Indexing and registering the change in science 2.0 publication-title: PLoS ONE – volume: 25 start-page: 14 year: 2013 end-page: 19 ident: bib0300 article-title: Institutional altmetrics & academic libraries publication-title: Information Standards Quarterly – start-page: 1 year: 2011 end-page: 12 ident: bib0375 article-title: Citation analysis in Twitter: Approaches for defining and measuring information flows within Tweets during scientific conferences publication-title: Making Sense of Microposts (MSM2011), CEUR workshop proceedings – volume: 15 start-page: 17 issue: 11 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0200 article-title: Correlation and interaction visualization of altmetric indicators extracted from scholarly social network activities: Dimensions and structure publication-title: Journal of Medical Internet Research doi: 10.2196/jmir.2707 – volume: 45 start-page: 392 issue: 3 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0130 article-title: Social scholarship: Reconsidering scholarly practices in the age of social media publication-title: British Journal of Educational Technology doi: 10.1111/bjet.12150 – volume: 7 start-page: 562 issue: 2 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0065 article-title: How to calculate the practical significance of citation impact differences? An empirical example from evaluative institutional bibliometrics using adjusted predictions and marginal effects publication-title: Journal of Informetrics doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2013.02.005 – volume: 7 issue: 11 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0240 article-title: Article-level metrics and the evolution of scientific impact publication-title: Plos Biology doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000242 – start-page: 1 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0375 article-title: Citation analysis in Twitter: Approaches for defining and measuring information flows within Tweets during scientific conferences – volume: 65 start-page: 433 issue: 3 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0365 article-title: F1000 recommendations as a potential new data source for research evaluation: A Comparison with citations publication-title: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology doi: 10.1002/asi.23040 – volume: 13 start-page: e123 issue: 4 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0095 article-title: Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact publication-title: J Med Internet Res doi: 10.2196/jmir.2012 – volume: 65 start-page: 647 issue: 3 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0050 article-title: Is there currently a scientific revolution in scientometrics? publication-title: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology doi: 10.1002/asi.23073 – volume: 180 start-page: 528 issue: 5 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0115 article-title: Health research: Measuring the social, health and economic benefits publication-title: Canadian Medical Association Journal doi: 10.1503/cmaj.090016 – year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0235 – volume: 64 start-page: 217 issue: 2 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0045 article-title: What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? A literature survey publication-title: Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology doi: 10.1002/asi.22803 – volume: 44 start-page: 3 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0185 article-title: Usage Bibliometrics publication-title: Annual Review of Information Science and Technology doi: 10.1002/aris.2010.1440440108 – volume: 98 start-page: 1131 issue: 2 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0320 article-title: Evaluating altmetrics publication-title: Scientometrics doi: 10.1007/s11192-013-1117-2 – volume: 25 start-page: 20 issue: 2 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0195 article-title: Altmetrics in evolution: Defining and redefining the ontology of article-level metrics publication-title: Information Standards Quarterly doi: 10.3789/isqv25no2.2013.04 – start-page: 3 issue: 37 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0335 article-title: A brief history of altmetrics publication-title: Research Trends – volume: 26 start-page: 11 issue: 1 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0010 article-title: Altmetric: Enriching scholarly content with article-level discussion and metrics publication-title: Learned Publishing doi: 10.1087/20130103 – volume: 25 start-page: 4 issue: 2 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0070 article-title: Consuming article-level metrics: Observations and lessons publication-title: Information Standards Quarterly doi: 10.3789/isqv25no2.2013.02 – start-page: 209 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0380 article-title: Citations in Web 2. 0 – ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0210 – volume: 65 start-page: 1627 issue: 8 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0220 article-title: Mendeley readership altmetrics for the social sciences and humanities: Research evaluation and knowledge flows publication-title: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology doi: 10.1002/asi.23071 – volume: 38 start-page: 359 issue: 8 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0075 article-title: Science communication in a digital age: Social media and the American fisheries society publication-title: Fisheries doi: 10.1080/03632415.2013.816289 – volume: 49 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0245 article-title: Scientific bloggers under the altmetric microscope publication-title: Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology doi: 10.1002/meet.14504901305 – volume: 65 start-page: 656 issue: 4 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0160 article-title: Tweeting biomedicine: An analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature publication-title: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology doi: 10.1002/asi.23101 – volume: 11 start-page: e1001687 issue: 10 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0110 article-title: What can article-level metrics do for you? publication-title: PLoS Biol doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001687 – volume: 8 issue: 5 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0340 article-title: Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services publication-title: PLoS ONE doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064841 – start-page: 19 issue: 35 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0330 article-title: Towards a common model of citation: Some thoughts on merging altmetrics and bibliometrics publication-title: Research Trends – year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0385 – start-page: 1 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0140 article-title: Using altmetrics for assessing research impact in the humanities publication-title: Scientometrics – start-page: 1 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0390 article-title: How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications publication-title: Scientometrics – volume: 64 start-page: 1523 issue: 8 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0080 article-title: The evolving indicator space (iSpace) publication-title: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology doi: 10.1002/asi.23041 – volume: 91 start-page: 461 issue: 2 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0190 article-title: Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement publication-title: Scientometrics doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0580-x – volume: 74 start-page: 317 issue: 2 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0355 article-title: A new look at evidence of scholarly citation in citation indexes and from web sources publication-title: Scientometrics doi: 10.1007/s11192-008-0220-2 – volume: 493 start-page: 159 issue: 7431 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0250 article-title: Altmetrics: Value all research products publication-title: Nature doi: 10.1038/493159a – volume: 15. issue: 7 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0265 article-title: Scientometrics 2.0: Toward new metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web publication-title: First Monday doi: 10.5210/fm.v15i7.2874 – volume: 73 start-page: 596 issue: 10 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0295 article-title: From bibliometrics to altmetrics: A changing scholarly landscape publication-title: College & Research Libraries News doi: 10.5860/crln.73.10.8846 – year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0025 – start-page: 89 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0285 article-title: (Micro)blogging science? Notes on potentials and constraints of new forms of scholarly communication – volume: 65 start-page: 446 issue: 3 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0090 article-title: The Google scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators publication-title: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology doi: 10.1002/asi.23056 – volume: 94 start-page: 851 issue: 3 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0370 article-title: Citation time window choice for research impact evaluation publication-title: Scientometrics doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0775-9 – volume: 58 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0305 article-title: A multi-metric approach for research evaluation publication-title: Chinese Science Bulletin – volume: 11 start-page: e1001535 issue: 4 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0030 article-title: An Introduction to social media for scientists publication-title: PLoS Biology doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001535 – volume: 25 start-page: 14 issue: 2 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0300 article-title: Institutional altmetrics & academic libraries publication-title: Information Standards Quarterly doi: 10.3789/isqv25no2.2013.03 – year: 1994 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0125 – start-page: 307 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0020 article-title: Bibliographic references in: Web 2.0 – year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0270 article-title: Uncovering impacts: CitedIn and total-impact, two new tools for gathering altmetrics – volume: 41 start-page: 53 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0345 article-title: Altmetrics: New indicators for scientific communication in Web 2.0 publication-title: Comunicar doi: 10.3916/C41-2013-05 – volume: 13 start-page: 673 issue: 8 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0040 article-title: Measuring the societal impact of research publication-title: EMBO Reports doi: 10.1038/embor.2012.99 – year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0275 – volume: 110 start-page: 291 issue: 2–3 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0170 article-title: Twitter and the health reforms in the English National Health Service publication-title: Health Policy doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.02.005 – start-page: 1 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0165 article-title: Disciplinary differences in Twitter scholarly communication publication-title: Scientometrics – year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0260 article-title: Altmetrics – volume: 7 start-page: 158 issue: 1 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0060 article-title: The use of percentiles and percentile rank classes in the analysis of bibliometric data: Opportunities and limits publication-title: Journal of Informetrics doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2012.10.001 – volume: 64 start-page: 45 issue: 1 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0055 article-title: What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior publication-title: Journal of Documentation doi: 10.1108/00220410810844150 – volume: 58 start-page: 1055 issue: 7 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0180 article-title: Google Scholar citations and Google Web/URL citations: A multi-discipline exploratory analysis publication-title: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology doi: 10.1002/asi.20584 – volume: 39 start-page: 10 issue: 4 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0255 article-title: The power of altmetrics on a CV publication-title: Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology doi: 10.1002/bult.2013.1720390405 – start-page: 1 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0155 article-title: Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community publication-title: Scientometrics – year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0230 – year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0015 – volume: 25 start-page: 27 issue: 2 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0325 article-title: Exploring the boundaries: How altmetrics can expand our vision of scholarly communication and social impact publication-title: Information Standards Quarterly doi: 10.3789/isqv25no2.2013.05 – volume: 97 start-page: 383 issue: 2 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0215 article-title: Assessing non-standard article impact using F1000 labels publication-title: Scientometrics doi: 10.1007/s11192-013-0993-9 – volume: 65 start-page: 1018 issue: 5 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0310 article-title: Do blog citations correlate with a higher number of future citations? Research blogs as a potential source for alternative metrics publication-title: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology doi: 10.1002/asi.23037 – volume: 39 start-page: 22 issue: 4 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0175 article-title: New opportunities for repositories in the age of altmetrics publication-title: Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology doi: 10.1002/bult.2013.1720390408 – year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0360 – volume: 7 start-page: e50109 issue: 12 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0100 article-title: Research blogging: Indexing and registering the change in science 2.0 publication-title: PLoS ONE doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050109 – start-page: 327 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0145 article-title: Readership metrics – year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0280 – volume: 32 start-page: 335 issue: 4 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0120 article-title: Introduction to altmetrics for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) Librarians publication-title: Science & Technology Libraries doi: 10.1080/0194262X.2013.829762 – volume: 25 start-page: 33 issue: 2 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0135 article-title: Social Signals reflect academic impact: What it means when a scholar adds a paper to Mendeley publication-title: Information Standards Quarterly doi: 10.3789/isqv25no2.2013.06 – start-page: 23 issue: 37 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0005 article-title: The grey literature from an altmetrics perspective – opportunity and challenges publication-title: Research Trends – year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0315 article-title: How is research blogged? A content analysis approach publication-title: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology doi: 10.1002/asi.23239 – volume: 39 start-page: 31 issue: 4 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0205 article-title: Five challenges in altmetrics: A toolmaker's perspective publication-title: Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology doi: 10.1002/bult.2013.1720390410 – volume: 17 issue: 11 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0150 article-title: Using social bookmarks and tags as alternative indicators of journal content description publication-title: First Monday doi: 10.5210/fm.v17i11.4110 – volume: 25 start-page: 3 issue: 2 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0105 article-title: Letter from the guest content editor: Altmetrics have come of age publication-title: Information Standards Quarterly doi: 10.3789/isqv25no2.2013.01 – year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0225 – volume: 56 start-page: 1075 issue: 10 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0350 article-title: Web citation data for impact assessment: A comparison of four science disciplines publication-title: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology doi: 10.1002/asi.20199 – volume: 1 start-page: e16v11 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0085 article-title: The role of Twitter in the life cycle of a scientific publication publication-title: PeerJ PrePrints – year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0290 – volume: 45 start-page: 199 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005_bib0035 article-title: Scientific peer review publication-title: Annual Review of Information Science and Technology doi: 10.1002/aris.2011.1440450112 |
| SSID | ssj0056619 |
| Score | 2.5357451 |
| SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
| Snippet | •Alternative metrics (altmetrics) are considered an interesting option for measuring broader impact of research.•Altmetrics is a term to describe web-based... Today, it is not clear how the impact of research on other areas of society than science should be measured. While peer review and bibliometrics have become... |
| SourceID | proquest crossref elsevier |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
| StartPage | 895 |
| SubjectTerms | Altmetrics Bibliometrics Broader impact Impact analysis Peer review Scientometrics Social aspects Social networks Societal impact |
| Title | Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics |
| URI | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1665161005 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1735638531 |
| Volume | 8 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwEB612wsXBAVEoa2MhDgghU0cO48TWrVUC4heoFJvlp8iVUlWTXrtb-9M4rQCoR56SzJ2HHnsbybyNzMA7_HXmDvvisSYOiQiWJ0Ym-nEOy9KCmGWY23AH6fF-kx8O5fnW3A0x8IQrTJi_4TpI1rHJ8s4m8tN0yx_ouGjTDGUcY4c82obdnheF3IBO6uv39enMyCjwzLW96D2CXWYDzdHmtdF1xDBa8p2SkXs_m-e_gHq0fqcPIOn0W1kq-nLnsOWb3fhIAYdsA8sRhXRLLO4XV9Ae9wxfTn8oaJZtmebrmkHNnQMfT5mrjriMLMpSpJ1gcW0P78_s1XLiNhJhwYkMAiHoRl6plvHXNOPtIEBcagn6f0AL-Hs5Muvo3US6yskVnAxJJrbGi9KrblPTfBaB2tCqKQvKY-Y9KaURV2ZUNY6l1Wlc58WqRU6DyX3WZq_gkXbtf41MJe60oks4Lu8sMLUvvI2My7knlse-B6k87QqG5OPUw2MSzWzzC4UakKRJlRaK9TEHny867KZMm881FjMulJ_LR-FluGhbvuzXlXcu73KikKiHzyK392JcdfRUYpufXeNbcpcInIhgL153Mhv4QndTbTAfVgMV9f-AN2bwRzC9qeb7DAu4luimvv2 |
| linkProvider | Elsevier |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Jb9UwELZKOcAFURZRaGGQEAek8LLYcXJCVRc9oO2FVurN8qqmKslTk1757cwkzkMg1ENvUWacRB77m4n8zQxjH_DXOHfelYkxdUh4sDoxNtOJd55LSmEWY2_Ak9Nyec6_XYiLDbY_58IQrTJi_4TpI1rHO4s4m4tV0yx-oOOjSjFUcY4C8-oBe8hFIYnX9_nXmueB4crY3YO0E1KfjzZHktdV1xC9a6p1Si3s_u-c_oHp0fccPWVPYtAIe9N3bbEN3z5juzHlAD5CzCmiOYa4WZ-z9qADfT38pJZZtodV17QDDB1gxAfmpiMGM0w5ktAFiEV_Lr_AXgtE66QjAxIYBMPQDD3o1oFr-pE0MCAK9ST984IX7Pzo8Gx_mcTuConlOR8SndsaL6TWuU9N8FoHa0KohJdURUx4I0VZVybIWheiqnTh0zK1XBdB5j5Li5dss-1a_4qBS510PAv4LM8tN7WvvM2MC4XPbR7ybZbO06psLD1OHTCu1cwxu1JoCUWWUGmt0BLb7NN6yGqqu3GXMp9tpf5aPAr9wl3Ddma7qrhze5WVpcAoeBS_X4txz9FBim59d4s6shCIWwhfr-_35nfs0fLs5Fgdfz39_oY9JslEENxhm8PNrd_FQGcwb8eF_BvISPzB |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do+altmetrics+point+to+the+broader+impact+of+research%3F+An+overview+of+benefits+and+disadvantages+of+altmetrics&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+informetrics&rft.au=Bornmann%2C+Lutz&rft.date=2014-10-01&rft.issn=1751-1577&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=895&rft.epage=903&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.joi.2014.09.005&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1751-1577&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1751-1577&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1751-1577&client=summon |