Literature review of the distribution of hepatitis C virus genotypes across Europe

Recent advances in hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapies have transformed the treatment landscape for this disease. However, efficacy of current treatments depends on HCV genotype and individual patient characteristics. This review aimed to appraise observational studies reporting epidemiological outcom...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of medical virology Vol. 88; no. 12; pp. 2157 - 2169
Main Authors Alberti, Alfredo, Lacoin, Laure, Morais, Edith, Lefevre, Cinira, Abogunrin, Seye, Iheanacho, Ike
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.12.2016
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0146-6615
1096-9071
DOI10.1002/jmv.24573

Cover

More Information
Summary:Recent advances in hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapies have transformed the treatment landscape for this disease. However, efficacy of current treatments depends on HCV genotype and individual patient characteristics. This review aimed to appraise observational studies reporting epidemiological outcomes to characterize HCV genotype distribution in Europe, in the general HCV population and various subpopulations of interest. MEDLINE and EMBASE entries published between November 2008 and November 2013 were systematically searched. Studies were grouped according to the patient populations of interest: general HCV population, HCV–HIV co‐infected patients, patients with advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis, and liver transplant recipients. Thirty publications provided estimates of HCV genotype distribution in four distinct patient groups: general HCV population (n = 21), HCV–HIV co‐infected patients (n = 6), liver transplant patients (n = 3), and patients with HCV‐compensated cirrhosis (n = 1). Nationwide estimates of genotype distribution in the general HCV population were available for 10 countries, with genotypes 1 and 3 the most commonly reported. Romanian studies were found to have reported genotype 1 infections almost exclusively (98.0–99.8%). Considerable regional variation was reported in some countries (e.g., Italy), but not others (e.g., France). National and multi‐national estimates for the HCV–HIV co‐infected population suggested a different genotype distribution to that in the general HCV population. No studies reported nationwide genotype distribution in patients with advanced liver disease. Given the clinical importance of genotype in developing optimal HCV eradication strategies, further nationwide European studies are needed to fully characterize genotype distribution in both the general HCV population and in HCV subpopulations. J. Med. Virol. 88:2157–2169, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-QRXS21B4-4
istex:67CEB8B8CC2B95A8343019FB9F7E7B2BCDAF58A0
Bristol-Myers Squibb
ArticleID:JMV24573
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:0146-6615
1096-9071
DOI:10.1002/jmv.24573