Matching conditional and marginal shapes in binary random intercept models using a bridge distribution function

Random effects logistic regression models are often used to model clustered binary response data. Regression parameters in these models have a conditional, subject‐specific interpretation in that they quantify regression effects for each cluster. Very often, the logistic functional shape conditional...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBiometrika Vol. 90; no. 4; pp. 765 - 775
Main Authors Wang, Zengri, Louis, Thomas A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Oxford University Press 01.12.2003
Biometrika Trust, University College London
Oxford University Press for Biometrika Trust
Oxford Publishing Limited (England)
SeriesBiometrika
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0006-3444
1464-3510
DOI10.1093/biomet/90.4.765

Cover

More Information
Summary:Random effects logistic regression models are often used to model clustered binary response data. Regression parameters in these models have a conditional, subject‐specific interpretation in that they quantify regression effects for each cluster. Very often, the logistic functional shape conditional on the random effects does not carry over to the marginal scale. Thus, parameters in these models usually do not have an explicit marginal, population‐averaged interpretation. We study a bridge distribution function for the random effect in the random intercept logistic regression model. Under this distributional assumption, the marginal functional shape is still of logistic form, and thus regression parameters have an explicit marginal interpretation. The main advantage of this approach is that likelihood inference can be obtained for either marginal or conditional regression inference within a single model framework. The generality of the results and some properties of the bridge distribution functions are discussed. An example is used for illustration.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/HXZ-F6M4MM7C-X
local:900765
May 2002. May 2003.
istex:358D6F86855536C41DA9675994BA6BC5B805E499
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ISSN:0006-3444
1464-3510
DOI:10.1093/biomet/90.4.765