Self‐Gated Radial Free‐Breathing Liver MR Elastography: Assessment of Technical Performance in Children at 3 T
Background Conventional liver magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) requires breath‐holding (BH) to avoid motion artifacts, which is challenging for children. While radial free‐breathing (FB)‐MRE is an alternative for quantifying liver stiffness (LS), previous methods had limitations of long scan ti...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging Vol. 61; no. 3; pp. 1271 - 1283 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Hoboken, USA
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
01.03.2025
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1053-1807 1522-2586 1522-2586 |
DOI | 10.1002/jmri.29541 |
Cover
Abstract | Background
Conventional liver magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) requires breath‐holding (BH) to avoid motion artifacts, which is challenging for children. While radial free‐breathing (FB)‐MRE is an alternative for quantifying liver stiffness (LS), previous methods had limitations of long scan times, acquiring two slices in 5 minutes, and not resolving motion during reconstruction.
Purpose
To reduce FB‐MRE scan time to 4 minutes for four slices and to investigate the impact of self‐gated (SG) motion compensation on FB‐MRE LS quantification in terms of agreement, intrasession repeatability, and technical quality compared to conventional BH‐MRE.
Study Type
Prospective.
Population
Twenty‐six children without fibrosis (median age: 12.9 years, 15 females).
Field Strength/Sequence
3 T; Cartesian gradient‐echo (GRE) BH‐MRE, research application radial GRE FB‐MRE.
Assessment
Participants were scanned twice to measure repeatability, without moving the table or changing the participants' position. LS was measured in areas of the liver with numerical confidence ≥90%. Technical quality was examined using measurable liver area (%).
Statistical Tests
Agreement of LS between BH‐MRE and FB‐MRE was evaluated using Bland–Altman analysis for SG acceptance rates of 40%, 60%, 80%, and 100%. LS repeatability was assessed using within‐subject coefficient of variation (wCV). The differences in LS and measurable liver area were examined using Kruskal–Wallis and Wilcoxon signed‐rank tests. P < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results
FB‐MRE with 60% SG achieved the closest agreement with BH‐MRE (mean difference 0.00 kPa). The LS ranged from 1.70 to 1.83 kPa with no significant differences between BH‐MRE and FB‐MRE with varying SG rates (P = 0.52). All tested methods produced repeatable LS with wCV from 4.4% to 6.5%. The median measurable liver area was smaller for FB‐MRE (32%–45%) than that for BH‐MRE (91%–93%) (P < 0.05).
Data Conclusion
FB‐MRE with 60% SG can quantify LS with close agreement and comparable repeatability with respect to BH‐MRE in children.
Level of Evidence
2
Technical Efficacy
Stage 1 |
---|---|
AbstractList | Background
Conventional liver magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) requires breath‐holding (BH) to avoid motion artifacts, which is challenging for children. While radial free‐breathing (FB)‐MRE is an alternative for quantifying liver stiffness (LS), previous methods had limitations of long scan times, acquiring two slices in 5 minutes, and not resolving motion during reconstruction.
Purpose
To reduce FB‐MRE scan time to 4 minutes for four slices and to investigate the impact of self‐gated (SG) motion compensation on FB‐MRE LS quantification in terms of agreement, intrasession repeatability, and technical quality compared to conventional BH‐MRE.
Study Type
Prospective.
Population
Twenty‐six children without fibrosis (median age: 12.9 years, 15 females).
Field Strength/Sequence
3 T; Cartesian gradient‐echo (GRE) BH‐MRE, research application radial GRE FB‐MRE.
Assessment
Participants were scanned twice to measure repeatability, without moving the table or changing the participants' position. LS was measured in areas of the liver with numerical confidence ≥90%. Technical quality was examined using measurable liver area (%).
Statistical Tests
Agreement of LS between BH‐MRE and FB‐MRE was evaluated using Bland–Altman analysis for SG acceptance rates of 40%, 60%, 80%, and 100%. LS repeatability was assessed using within‐subject coefficient of variation (wCV). The differences in LS and measurable liver area were examined using Kruskal–Wallis and Wilcoxon signed‐rank tests. P < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results
FB‐MRE with 60% SG achieved the closest agreement with BH‐MRE (mean difference 0.00 kPa). The LS ranged from 1.70 to 1.83 kPa with no significant differences between BH‐MRE and FB‐MRE with varying SG rates (P = 0.52). All tested methods produced repeatable LS with wCV from 4.4% to 6.5%. The median measurable liver area was smaller for FB‐MRE (32%–45%) than that for BH‐MRE (91%–93%) (P < 0.05).
Data Conclusion
FB‐MRE with 60% SG can quantify LS with close agreement and comparable repeatability with respect to BH‐MRE in children.
Level of Evidence
2
Technical Efficacy
Stage 1 Conventional liver magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) requires breath-holding (BH) to avoid motion artifacts, which is challenging for children. While radial free-breathing (FB)-MRE is an alternative for quantifying liver stiffness (LS), previous methods had limitations of long scan times, acquiring two slices in 5 minutes, and not resolving motion during reconstruction. To reduce FB-MRE scan time to 4 minutes for four slices and to investigate the impact of self-gated (SG) motion compensation on FB-MRE LS quantification in terms of agreement, intrasession repeatability, and technical quality compared to conventional BH-MRE. Prospective. Twenty-six children without fibrosis (median age: 12.9 years, 15 females). 3 T; Cartesian gradient-echo (GRE) BH-MRE, research application radial GRE FB-MRE. Participants were scanned twice to measure repeatability, without moving the table or changing the participants' position. LS was measured in areas of the liver with numerical confidence ≥90%. Technical quality was examined using measurable liver area (%). Agreement of LS between BH-MRE and FB-MRE was evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis for SG acceptance rates of 40%, 60%, 80%, and 100%. LS repeatability was assessed using within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV). The differences in LS and measurable liver area were examined using Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. P < 0.05 was considered significant. FB-MRE with 60% SG achieved the closest agreement with BH-MRE (mean difference 0.00 kPa). The LS ranged from 1.70 to 1.83 kPa with no significant differences between BH-MRE and FB-MRE with varying SG rates (P = 0.52). All tested methods produced repeatable LS with wCV from 4.4% to 6.5%. The median measurable liver area was smaller for FB-MRE (32%-45%) than that for BH-MRE (91%-93%) (P < 0.05). FB-MRE with 60% SG can quantify LS with close agreement and comparable repeatability with respect to BH-MRE in children. 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1. Conventional liver magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) requires breath-holding (BH) to avoid motion artifacts, which is challenging for children. While radial free-breathing (FB)-MRE is an alternative for quantifying liver stiffness (LS), previous methods had limitations of long scan times, acquiring two slices in 5 minutes, and not resolving motion during reconstruction.BACKGROUNDConventional liver magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) requires breath-holding (BH) to avoid motion artifacts, which is challenging for children. While radial free-breathing (FB)-MRE is an alternative for quantifying liver stiffness (LS), previous methods had limitations of long scan times, acquiring two slices in 5 minutes, and not resolving motion during reconstruction.To reduce FB-MRE scan time to 4 minutes for four slices and to investigate the impact of self-gated (SG) motion compensation on FB-MRE LS quantification in terms of agreement, intrasession repeatability, and technical quality compared to conventional BH-MRE.PURPOSETo reduce FB-MRE scan time to 4 minutes for four slices and to investigate the impact of self-gated (SG) motion compensation on FB-MRE LS quantification in terms of agreement, intrasession repeatability, and technical quality compared to conventional BH-MRE.Prospective.STUDY TYPEProspective.Twenty-six children without fibrosis (median age: 12.9 years, 15 females).POPULATIONTwenty-six children without fibrosis (median age: 12.9 years, 15 females).3 T; Cartesian gradient-echo (GRE) BH-MRE, research application radial GRE FB-MRE.FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE3 T; Cartesian gradient-echo (GRE) BH-MRE, research application radial GRE FB-MRE.Participants were scanned twice to measure repeatability, without moving the table or changing the participants' position. LS was measured in areas of the liver with numerical confidence ≥90%. Technical quality was examined using measurable liver area (%).ASSESSMENTParticipants were scanned twice to measure repeatability, without moving the table or changing the participants' position. LS was measured in areas of the liver with numerical confidence ≥90%. Technical quality was examined using measurable liver area (%).Agreement of LS between BH-MRE and FB-MRE was evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis for SG acceptance rates of 40%, 60%, 80%, and 100%. LS repeatability was assessed using within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV). The differences in LS and measurable liver area were examined using Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. P < 0.05 was considered significant.STATISTICAL TESTSAgreement of LS between BH-MRE and FB-MRE was evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis for SG acceptance rates of 40%, 60%, 80%, and 100%. LS repeatability was assessed using within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV). The differences in LS and measurable liver area were examined using Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. P < 0.05 was considered significant.FB-MRE with 60% SG achieved the closest agreement with BH-MRE (mean difference 0.00 kPa). The LS ranged from 1.70 to 1.83 kPa with no significant differences between BH-MRE and FB-MRE with varying SG rates (P = 0.52). All tested methods produced repeatable LS with wCV from 4.4% to 6.5%. The median measurable liver area was smaller for FB-MRE (32%-45%) than that for BH-MRE (91%-93%) (P < 0.05).RESULTSFB-MRE with 60% SG achieved the closest agreement with BH-MRE (mean difference 0.00 kPa). The LS ranged from 1.70 to 1.83 kPa with no significant differences between BH-MRE and FB-MRE with varying SG rates (P = 0.52). All tested methods produced repeatable LS with wCV from 4.4% to 6.5%. The median measurable liver area was smaller for FB-MRE (32%-45%) than that for BH-MRE (91%-93%) (P < 0.05).FB-MRE with 60% SG can quantify LS with close agreement and comparable repeatability with respect to BH-MRE in children.DATA CONCLUSIONFB-MRE with 60% SG can quantify LS with close agreement and comparable repeatability with respect to BH-MRE in children.2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1. |
Author | Bolster, Bradley D. Calkins, Kara L. Wu, Holden H. Delgado, Timoteo I. Shih, Shu‐Fu Deshpande, Vibhas Adamos, Timothy R. Ghahremani, Shahnaz Kafali, Sevgi Gokce Zhong, Xiaodong |
AuthorAffiliation | 3 US MR R&D Collaborations Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. Salt Lake City Utah USA 4 Physics and Biology in Medicine Interdepartmental Program, David Geffen School of Medicine University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles California USA 2 Department of Bioengineering University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles California USA 6 Department of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles California USA 1 Department of Radiological Sciences David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles California USA 5 US MR R&D Collaborations Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. Austin Texas USA |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 3 US MR R&D Collaborations Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. Salt Lake City Utah USA – name: 1 Department of Radiological Sciences David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles California USA – name: 2 Department of Bioengineering University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles California USA – name: 5 US MR R&D Collaborations Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. Austin Texas USA – name: 6 Department of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles California USA – name: 4 Physics and Biology in Medicine Interdepartmental Program, David Geffen School of Medicine University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles California USA |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Sevgi Gokce orcidid: 0000-0001-5941-5399 surname: Kafali fullname: Kafali, Sevgi Gokce organization: University of California Los Angeles – sequence: 2 givenname: Bradley D. orcidid: 0000-0003-1474-0969 surname: Bolster fullname: Bolster, Bradley D. organization: Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc – sequence: 3 givenname: Shu‐Fu orcidid: 0000-0002-3812-9091 surname: Shih fullname: Shih, Shu‐Fu organization: University of California Los Angeles – sequence: 4 givenname: Timoteo I. surname: Delgado fullname: Delgado, Timoteo I. organization: University of California Los Angeles – sequence: 5 givenname: Vibhas surname: Deshpande fullname: Deshpande, Vibhas organization: Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc – sequence: 6 givenname: Xiaodong orcidid: 0000-0001-8355-5279 surname: Zhong fullname: Zhong, Xiaodong organization: University of California Los Angeles – sequence: 7 givenname: Timothy R. surname: Adamos fullname: Adamos, Timothy R. organization: University of California Los Angeles – sequence: 8 givenname: Shahnaz surname: Ghahremani fullname: Ghahremani, Shahnaz organization: David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles – sequence: 9 givenname: Kara L. surname: Calkins fullname: Calkins, Kara L. organization: University of California Los Angeles – sequence: 10 givenname: Holden H. orcidid: 0000-0002-2585-5916 surname: Wu fullname: Wu, Holden H. email: holdenwu@mednet.ucla.edu organization: University of California Los Angeles |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39036994$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kc1uEzEUhS1URH9gwwMgLxHSFP-MMzYbVKK2FKUChbC2PJ47GVceO7UnRdl1y45n7JMwIaUChFj5yvc7517dc4j2QgyA0HNKjikh7PVVn9wxU6Kkj9ABFYwVTMjJ3lgTwQsqSbWPDnO-IoQoVYonaJ8rwidjfYCGz-Dbu9vv52aABs9N44zHZwlg_HuXwAydC0s8czeQ8OUcn3qTh7hMZtVt3uCTnCHnHsKAY4sXYLvg7Kj_BKmNqTfBAnYBTzvnmwQBmwHzu9tvi6focWt8hmf37xH6cna6mL4vZh_PL6Yns8KWjNKCKWKkqC0xtagqVQGXTc1qzhvZKKEAjK14zUohQbSqpsyqRpZWTlgt5aRV_Ai93fmu1nUPjR0XTcbrVXK9SRsdjdN_doLr9DLeaEorQSmno8PLe4cUr9eQB927bMF7EyCus-ZEckal4mxEX_w-7GHKr1uPwKsdYFPMOUH7gFCit0HqbZD6Z5AjTP6CrRvM4OJ2Uef_LaE7yVfnYfMfc_3hcn6x0_wA_TO0HA |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1002_jmri_29542 |
Cites_doi | 10.1007/s00247-022-05297-8 10.2214/AJR.17.19288 10.2214/AJR.18.19761 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.06.012 10.1002/jmri.27205 10.1148/radiol.2016160589 10.1007/s10620-012-2196-2 10.1002/jmri.20969 10.1002/jmri.23980 10.1002/mrm.26693 10.1002/mrm.26028 10.1002/mrm.21152 10.1002/jmri.26644 10.1002/mrm.28445 10.1002/jmri.23731 10.1016/j.mri.2014.02.013 10.1016/j.acra.2019.07.009 10.1016/j.mri.2016.10.011 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010 10.1002/mrm.22752 10.1002/mrm.25054 10.1002/mrm.29859 10.1177/0962280214537344 10.1002/jmri.27976 10.1007/s00247-016-3613-z 10.1002/mrm.28558 10.2214/AJR.21.27135 10.1148/radiol.2018172099 10.1002/jmri.26610 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.07.050 10.1002/hep.29241 10.1002/mrm.28052 10.1002/mrm.25341 10.1148/radiol.2017161398 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2024 The Author(s). published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2024 The Author(s). published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. – notice: 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. |
DBID | 24P AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1002/jmri.29541 |
DatabaseName | Wiley Online Library Open Access CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: 24P name: Wiley Online Library Open Access url: https://authorservices.wiley.com/open-science/open-access/browse-journals.html sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
DocumentTitleAlternate | Self‐Gated Radial Free‐Breathing Liver MRE |
EISSN | 1522-2586 |
EndPage | 1283 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC11751131 39036994 10_1002_jmri_29541 JMRI29541 |
Genre | researchArticle Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering funderid: U01EB031894 – fundername: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases funderid: R01DK124417; T32DK007180 – fundername: National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences funderid: UL1TR001881 – fundername: NIBIB NIH HHS grantid: U01EB031894 – fundername: NIDDK NIH HHS grantid: T32DK007180 – fundername: NIDDK NIH HHS grantid: T32 DK007180 – fundername: NIDDK NIH HHS grantid: R01 DK124417 – fundername: NCATS NIH HHS grantid: UL1 TR001881 – fundername: NIBIB NIH HHS grantid: U01 EB031894 – fundername: NIDDK NIH HHS grantid: R01DK124417 – fundername: NCATS NIH HHS grantid: UL1TR001881 |
GroupedDBID | --- -DZ .3N .GA .GJ .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1L6 1OB 1OC 1ZS 24P 31~ 33P 3O- 3SF 3WU 4.4 4ZD 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52R 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A01 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AAHQN AAIPD AAMNL AANHP AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAWTL AAXRX AAYCA AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABEML ABIJN ABJNI ABLJU ABOCM ABPVW ABQWH ABXGK ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACGFO ACGFS ACGOF ACIWK ACMXC ACPOU ACPRK ACRPL ACSCC ACXBN ACXQS ACYXJ ADBBV ADBTR ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADNMO ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN AEEZP AEGXH AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AEUQT AEUYR AFBPY AFFPM AFGKR AFPWT AFRAH AFWVQ AFZJQ AHBTC AHMBA AIACR AIAGR AITYG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ATUGU AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMXJE BROTX BRXPI BY8 C45 CS3 D-6 D-7 D-E D-F DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DU5 EBD EBS EJD EMOBN F00 F01 F04 F5P FEDTE FUBAC G-S G.N GNP GODZA H.X HBH HDBZQ HF~ HGLYW HHY HHZ HVGLF HZ~ IX1 J0M JPC KBYEO KQQ LATKE LAW LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES M65 MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ NNB O66 O9- OIG OVD P2P P2W P2X P2Z P4B P4D PALCI PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 QRW R.K RGB RIWAO RJQFR ROL RWI RX1 RYL SAMSI SUPJJ SV3 TEORI TWZ UB1 V2E V8K V9Y W8V W99 WBKPD WHWMO WIB WIH WIJ WIK WIN WJL WOHZO WQJ WRC WUP WVDHM WXI WXSBR XG1 XV2 ZXP ZZTAW ~IA ~WT AAMMB AAYXX AEFGJ AEYWJ AGHNM AGXDD AGYGG AIDQK AIDYY CITATION AGQPQ CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c4211-290a85bc0ab57797e38db2b33d8d959eeac73b2458e5f9b12c9d84c862b886f93 |
IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
ISSN | 1053-1807 1522-2586 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 18:38:20 EDT 2025 Tue Aug 05 09:53:23 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 02:13:28 EDT 2025 Wed Oct 01 04:37:28 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:10:56 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 07 09:41:49 EST 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 3 |
Keywords | liver stiffness liver MR elastography fibrosis free‐breathing radial sampling children |
Language | English |
License | Attribution 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4211-290a85bc0ab57797e38db2b33d8d959eeac73b2458e5f9b12c9d84c862b886f93 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0001-5941-5399 0000-0001-8355-5279 0000-0003-1474-0969 0000-0002-2585-5916 0000-0002-3812-9091 |
OpenAccessLink | https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fjmri.29541 |
PMID | 39036994 |
PQID | 3083218932 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 13 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11751131 proquest_miscellaneous_3083218932 pubmed_primary_39036994 crossref_primary_10_1002_jmri_29541 crossref_citationtrail_10_1002_jmri_29541 wiley_primary_10_1002_jmri_29541_JMRI29541 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | March 2025 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2025-03-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 2025 text: March 2025 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Hoboken, USA |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Hoboken, USA – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Magn Reson Imaging |
PublicationYear | 2025 |
Publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: John Wiley & Sons, Inc |
References | 2018; 287 2009; 42 2019; 50 2015; 73 2020; 83 2017; 66 2016; 76 2012; 57 2022; 219 2007; 57 2015; 24 2013; 37 2021; 53 2013; 38 2017; 37 2018; 211 2024; 91 2020; 27 2017; 282 2011; 65 2022; 52 2018; 91: 20170788 2007; 5 2017; 285 2022; 55 2014; 72 2021; 85 2014; 164 2016; 46 2014; 32 2007; 26 2018; 79 e_1_2_6_32_1 e_1_2_6_10_1 e_1_2_6_31_1 e_1_2_6_30_1 Lv J (e_1_2_6_29_1) 2018; 91 e_1_2_6_19_1 e_1_2_6_13_1 e_1_2_6_36_1 e_1_2_6_14_1 e_1_2_6_35_1 e_1_2_6_11_1 e_1_2_6_34_1 e_1_2_6_12_1 e_1_2_6_33_1 e_1_2_6_17_1 e_1_2_6_18_1 e_1_2_6_39_1 e_1_2_6_15_1 e_1_2_6_38_1 e_1_2_6_16_1 e_1_2_6_37_1 e_1_2_6_21_1 e_1_2_6_20_1 e_1_2_6_41_1 e_1_2_6_40_1 e_1_2_6_9_1 e_1_2_6_8_1 e_1_2_6_5_1 e_1_2_6_4_1 e_1_2_6_7_1 e_1_2_6_6_1 e_1_2_6_25_1 e_1_2_6_24_1 e_1_2_6_3_1 e_1_2_6_23_1 e_1_2_6_2_1 e_1_2_6_22_1 e_1_2_6_28_1 e_1_2_6_27_1 e_1_2_6_26_1 |
References_xml | – volume: 42 start-page: 377 issue: 2 year: 2009 end-page: 381 article-title: Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata‐driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support publication-title: J Biomed Inform – volume: 85 start-page: 945 issue: 2 year: 2021 end-page: 952 article-title: TURBINE‐MRE: A 3D hybrid radial‐Cartesian EPI acquisition for MR elastography publication-title: Magn Reson Med – volume: 32 start-page: 679 issue: 6 year: 2014 end-page: 683 article-title: Rapid acquisition technique for MR elastography of the liver publication-title: Magn Reson Imaging – volume: 57 start-page: 388 issue: 2 year: 2007 end-page: 395 article-title: Fractional encoding of harmonic motions in MR elastography publication-title: Magn Reson Med – volume: 211 start-page: 588 issue: 3 year: 2018 end-page: 594 article-title: Liver MR elastography at 3 T: Agreement across pulse sequences and effect of liver R2* on image quality publication-title: Am J Roentgenol – volume: 287 start-page: 824 issue: 3 year: 2018 end-page: 832 article-title: Diagnostic performance of MR elastography for liver fibrosis in children and young adults with a spectrum of liver diseases publication-title: Radiology – volume: 55 start-page: 1890 issue: 6 year: 2022 end-page: 1899 article-title: Quality control of magnetic resonance elastography using percent measurable liver volume estimation publication-title: J Magn Reson Imaging – volume: 50 start-page: 365 issue: 2 year: 2019 end-page: 376 article-title: Free‐breathing unsedated MRI in children: Justification and techniques publication-title: J Magn Reson Imaging – volume: 26 start-page: 375 issue: 2 year: 2007 end-page: 385 article-title: Measurement of signal‐to‐noise ratios in MR images: Influence of multichannel coils, parallel imaging, and reconstruction filters publication-title: J Magn Reson Imaging – volume: 50 start-page: 391 issue: 2 year: 2019 end-page: 396 article-title: Respiratory‐triggered spin‐echo echo‐planar imaging‐based MR elastography for evaluating liver stiffness publication-title: J Magn Reson Imaging – volume: 37 start-page: 544 issue: 3 year: 2013 end-page: 555 article-title: Magnetic resonance elastography of liver: Technique, analysis, and clinical applications publication-title: J Magn Reson Imaging – volume: 24 start-page: 27 issue: 1 year: 2015 end-page: 67 article-title: Quantitative imaging biomarkers: A review of statistical methods for technical performance assessment publication-title: Stat Methods Med Res – volume: 73 start-page: 2249 issue: 6 year: 2015 end-page: 2254 article-title: Respiratory self‐gating for free‐breathing magnetization transfer MRI of the abdomen publication-title: Magn Reson Med – volume: 65 start-page: 1630 issue: 6 year: 2011 end-page: 1637 article-title: Improvements in multislice parallel imaging using radial CAIPIRINHA publication-title: Magn Reson Med – volume: 211 start-page: W279 issue: 6 year: 2018 end-page: W287 article-title: Comparison of standard breath‐held, free‐breathing, and compressed sensing 2D gradient‐recalled echo MR elastography techniques for evaluating liver stiffness publication-title: Am J Roentgenol – volume: 285 start-page: 92 issue: 1 year: 2017 end-page: 100 article-title: Repeatability of MR elastography of liver: A meta‐analysis publication-title: Radiology – volume: 52 start-page: 1314 issue: 7 year: 2022 end-page: 1325 article-title: Free‐breathing radial magnetic resonance elastography of the liver in children at 3 T: A pilot study publication-title: Pediatr Radiol – volume: 83 start-page: 1964 issue: 6 year: 2020 end-page: 1978 article-title: Effect of respiratory motion on free‐breathing 3D stack‐of‐radial liver R2* relaxometry and improved quantification accuracy using self‐gating publication-title: Magn Reson Med – volume: 27 start-page: e109 issue: 5 year: 2020 end-page: e115 article-title: Magnetic resonance elastography of the liver in children and adolescents: Assessment of regional variations in stiffness publication-title: Acad Radiol – volume: 76 start-page: 1400 issue: 5 year: 2016 end-page: 1409 article-title: Total liver fat quantification using three‐dimensional respiratory self‐navigated MRI sequence publication-title: Magn Reson Med – volume: 57 start-page: 2713 issue: 10 year: 2012 end-page: 2719 article-title: Pediatric liver MR elastography publication-title: Dig Dis Sci – volume: 72 start-page: 1353 issue: 5 year: 2014 end-page: 1365 article-title: Liver fat quantification using a multi‐step adaptive fitting approach with multi‐echo GRE imaging publication-title: Magn Reson Med – volume: 66 start-page: 1474 issue: 5 year: 2017 end-page: 1485 article-title: Magnetic resonance elastography measured shear stiffness as a biomarker of fibrosis in pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease publication-title: Hepatology – volume: 219 start-page: 224 issue: 2 year: 2022 end-page: 232 article-title: Automated CNN–based analysis versus manual analysis for MR elastography in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Intermethod agreement and fibrosis stage discriminative performance publication-title: Am J Roentgenol – volume: 37 start-page: 46 year: 2017 end-page: 50 article-title: Comparison of breath‐hold, respiratory navigated and free‐breathing MR elastography of the liver publication-title: Magn Reson Imaging – volume: 53 start-page: 118 issue: 1 year: 2021 end-page: 129 article-title: Free‐breathing volumetric liver and proton density fat fraction quantification in pediatric patients using stack‐of‐radial MRI with self‐gating motion compensation publication-title: J Magn Reson Imaging – volume: 46 start-page: 916 issue: 6 year: 2016 end-page: 927 article-title: Strategies to minimize sedation in pediatric body magnetic resonance imaging publication-title: Pediatr Radiol – volume: 282 start-page: 761 issue: 3 year: 2017 end-page: 770 article-title: Spin‐echo echo‐planar imaging MR elastography versus gradient‐echo MR elastography for assessment of liver stiffness in children and young adults suspected of having liver disease publication-title: Radiology – volume: 91 start-page: 312 issue: 1 year: 2024 end-page: 324 article-title: Rapid MR elastography of the liver for subsecond stiffness sampling publication-title: Magn Reson Med – volume: 164 start-page: 186 issue: 1 year: 2014 end-page: 188 article-title: Use of magnetic resonance elastography to assess hepatic fibrosis in children with chronic liver disease publication-title: J Pediatr – volume: 85 start-page: 1962 issue: 4 year: 2021 end-page: 1973 article-title: Reduction of breathing artifacts in multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography of the abdomen publication-title: Magn Reson Med – volume: 79 start-page: 370 issue: 1 year: 2018 end-page: 382 article-title: Free‐breathing liver fat quantification using a multiecho 3 D stack‐of‐radial technique publication-title: Magn Reson Med – volume: 38 start-page: 371 issue: 2 year: 2013 end-page: 379 article-title: Automated liver stiffness measurements with magnetic resonance elastography publication-title: J Magn Reson Imaging – volume: 5 start-page: 1207 issue: 10 year: 2007 end-page: 1213 article-title: Assessment of hepatic fibrosis with magnetic resonance elastography publication-title: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol – volume: 91: 20170788 year: 2018 article-title: Respiratory motion correction for free‐breathing 3D abdominal MRI using CNN‐based image registration: A feasibility study publication-title: Br J Radiol – ident: e_1_2_6_15_1 doi: 10.1007/s00247-022-05297-8 – ident: e_1_2_6_26_1 – ident: e_1_2_6_8_1 doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.19288 – ident: e_1_2_6_11_1 doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.19761 – ident: e_1_2_6_18_1 – ident: e_1_2_6_5_1 doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.06.012 – ident: e_1_2_6_14_1 doi: 10.1002/jmri.27205 – ident: e_1_2_6_9_1 doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016160589 – ident: e_1_2_6_13_1 doi: 10.1007/s10620-012-2196-2 – ident: e_1_2_6_30_1 doi: 10.1002/jmri.20969 – ident: e_1_2_6_27_1 doi: 10.1002/jmri.23980 – ident: e_1_2_6_20_1 doi: 10.1002/mrm.26693 – ident: e_1_2_6_25_1 doi: 10.1002/mrm.26028 – ident: e_1_2_6_7_1 doi: 10.1002/mrm.21152 – ident: e_1_2_6_35_1 doi: 10.1002/jmri.26644 – ident: e_1_2_6_41_1 doi: 10.1002/mrm.28445 – ident: e_1_2_6_3_1 doi: 10.1002/jmri.23731 – ident: e_1_2_6_6_1 doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2014.02.013 – ident: e_1_2_6_19_1 – ident: e_1_2_6_34_1 doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.07.009 – ident: e_1_2_6_12_1 doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2016.10.011 – ident: e_1_2_6_16_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010 – ident: e_1_2_6_24_1 – volume: 91 year: 2018 ident: e_1_2_6_29_1 article-title: Respiratory motion correction for free‐breathing 3D abdominal MRI using CNN‐based image registration: A feasibility study publication-title: Br J Radiol – ident: e_1_2_6_40_1 doi: 10.1002/mrm.22752 – ident: e_1_2_6_17_1 doi: 10.1002/mrm.25054 – ident: e_1_2_6_21_1 – ident: e_1_2_6_33_1 doi: 10.1002/mrm.29859 – ident: e_1_2_6_31_1 doi: 10.1177/0962280214537344 – ident: e_1_2_6_32_1 doi: 10.1002/jmri.27976 – ident: e_1_2_6_39_1 doi: 10.1007/s00247-016-3613-z – ident: e_1_2_6_36_1 doi: 10.1002/mrm.28558 – ident: e_1_2_6_28_1 doi: 10.2214/AJR.21.27135 – ident: e_1_2_6_4_1 doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018172099 – ident: e_1_2_6_37_1 doi: 10.1002/jmri.26610 – ident: e_1_2_6_10_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.07.050 – ident: e_1_2_6_2_1 doi: 10.1002/hep.29241 – ident: e_1_2_6_22_1 doi: 10.1002/mrm.28052 – ident: e_1_2_6_38_1 doi: 10.1002/mrm.25341 – ident: e_1_2_6_23_1 doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017161398 |
SSID | ssj0009945 |
Score | 2.465574 |
Snippet | Background
Conventional liver magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) requires breath‐holding (BH) to avoid motion artifacts, which is challenging for children.... Conventional liver magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) requires breath-holding (BH) to avoid motion artifacts, which is challenging for children. While... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref wiley |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 1271 |
SubjectTerms | Adolescent Breath Holding Child children Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods Female fibrosis free‐breathing Humans Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods Liver - diagnostic imaging liver MR elastography liver stiffness Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Male Motion Prospective Studies radial sampling Reproducibility of Results Respiration |
Title | Self‐Gated Radial Free‐Breathing Liver MR Elastography: Assessment of Technical Performance in Children at 3 T |
URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fjmri.29541 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39036994 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3083218932 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11751131 |
Volume | 61 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVWIB databaseName: Wiley Online Library - Core collection (SURFmarket) issn: 1053-1807 databaseCode: DR2 dateStart: 19990101 customDbUrl: isFulltext: true eissn: 1522-2586 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0009945 providerName: Wiley-Blackwell |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3Pb9MwFLbGDogLv2FlYzKCC0jpEtupbcRlTKvGRNFUNmkXFPnZriiUdOrSC6ddd-Nv3F-Cn5OmlCEkuEXJS-I479mfn9_7HiEvbGY8AOiEOwMJlrhKQDifGCeYTIV3SmPu8OBD7-BEHJ7mp2vkzSIXpuaHaB1uaBlxvEYDN3C-syQN_fJtNu7iLhWufTKexz3a4ZI7SutYoTjgB55kKpUtNynbWd66Ohtdg5jXIyV_RbBxCurfIZ8Wja8jT7525xV07fffeB3_9-vuktsNNqW7tTLdI2u-vE9uDprd9wek-ugno6uLH-hxc3SIrAYT2p95H869RfCJ3iz6HiM96GBI9wMwrxpG7Nd0t6UApdMRjR591A96tMxcoOOS7jXJ5dRUlF9dXB4_JCf9_eO9g6Sp2pBYEVaTCdOpUTnY1EAupZaeKwcMOHfK6Vz7MNJLDkzkyucjDRmz2ilhw8oKlOqNNH9E1stp6TcIZdYLCVaK3GYCDEBAN1Jgsi3vudSzDnm5-HuFbSjNsbLGpKjJmFmB3VjEbuyQ563sWU3k8UepZwslKIKd4eaJKf10fl7wFGs6BXQX3vq4Vor2OVwHHBD0rUPUirq0AsjhvXqlHH-OXN7IlJplPLz4VVSHv7StOBwM38WjJ_8ivEluMaxZHOPmtsh6NZv7pwFIVbBNbjBxtB3N5ieUJR9Z |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1LT9wwELYQldpeEH0v0NYVvbRSSmI7a7s3ilgtsEFou0jcooztVRctWbSEO9fe-I38knqckO0KVKm3KJk8lM-Pz-OZbwj5bJLCAYCOuC0gwhJXEQjrosIKJmPhrNKYO5wdd_un4vAsPWticzAXptaHaB1u2DPCeI0dHB3SOwvV0POL-eQbblP5xc8T0WUxNmomThaauzrUKPYMgkeJimWrTsp2Fvcuz0cPSObDWMm_OWyYhHrrZK1hj3S3hvsFWXHlS_I0a_bHX5Hqp5uO725u0Sdm6RB1B6a0N3fOn_uB9BD9TXSAsRg0G9J9T52rRrP6O91tRTrpbEyDzx0RpCeL3AI6Kelek_5Ni4ryu5vfo9fktLc_2utHTV2FyAi_3ouYjguVgokLSKXU0nFlgQHnVlmdaufHYsmBiVS5dKwhYUZbJYxf-4BS3bHmb8hqOSvdO0KZcUKCkSI1iYACwPMPKTAdlndt7FiHfLn_u7lpRMex9sU0r-WSWY5I5AGJDtlubS9rqY1HrT7dg5T7noDbG0XpZtdXOY-x6pLnX_6tb2vQ2udw7Wdq3x46RC3B2RqgyvbylXLyK6hto5ZpknD_4q8B-X98W36YDQ_C0cb_GH8kz_qjbJAPDo6PNslzhhWGQ5TbFlmt5tfuvac9FXwIjfsP4tMBcg |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELaqIlVceD-2vIzgAlK2ie2sbcSllK7a0q2qpZV6qaKM7YilS7ZashdOvXLjN_aX4HGyWZYiJLhFiZM4zoz9zXjmG0JemiR3AKAjbnOIsMRVBMK6KLeCyVg4qzTmDg8OejvHYu8kPVkhb-e5MDU_ROtwQ80I8zUq-LktNhakoZ-_TEdd3KXyts810fPmFUKi4YI8SutQotgDCB4lKpYtOSnbWNy7vBxdwZhXQyV_hbBhDerfJKfz3tehJ2fdWQVd8-03Ysf__bxb5EYDTulmLU23yYor75C1QbP9fpdUH924uLz4gS43S4dIazCm_alz_tw7RJ_ozqL7GOpBB0O67ZF51VBiv6GbLQconRQ0uPRRQOjhInWBjkq61WSX07yi_PLi-9E9ctzfPtraiZqyDZER3pyMmI5zlYKJc0il1NJxZYEB51ZZnWrnp3rJgYlUubTQkDCjrRLGm1agVK_Q_D5ZLSele0goM05IMFKkJhGQA3h4IwVm2_KejR3rkFfzv5eZhtMcS2uMs5qNmWU4jFkYxg550bY9r5k8_tjq-VwIMq9ouHuSl24y-5rxGIs6eXjn3_qgFor2OVx7IODlrUPUkri0DZDEe_lKOfoUyLyRKjVJuH_x6yAOf-lbtjcY7oaj9X9p_IysHb7vZ_u7Bx8ekesM6xeHGLrHZLWaztwTD6oqeBp05ycrkiFN |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Self%E2%80%90Gated+Radial+Free%E2%80%90Breathing+Liver+MR+Elastography%3A+Assessment+of+Technical+Performance+in+Children+at+3%E2%80%89T&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+magnetic+resonance+imaging&rft.au=Kafali%2C+Sevgi+Gokce&rft.au=Bolster%2C+Bradley+D.&rft.au=Shih%2C+Shu%E2%80%90Fu&rft.au=Delgado%2C+Timoteo+I.&rft.date=2025-03-01&rft.pub=John+Wiley+%26+Sons%2C+Inc&rft.issn=1053-1807&rft.eissn=1522-2586&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1271&rft.epage=1283&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fjmri.29541&rft.externalDBID=10.1002%252Fjmri.29541&rft.externalDocID=JMRI29541 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1053-1807&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1053-1807&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1053-1807&client=summon |