Provider risk factors for medication administration error alerts: analyses of a large-scale closed-loop medication administration system using RFID and barcode
Purpose To determine the risk factors and rate of medication administration error (MAE) alerts by analyzing large‐scale medication administration data and related error logs automatically recorded in a closed‐loop medication administration system using radio‐frequency identification and barcodes. Me...
Saved in:
Published in | Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety Vol. 25; no. 12; pp. 1387 - 1396 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.12.2016
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1053-8569 1099-1557 1099-1557 |
DOI | 10.1002/pds.4068 |
Cover
Abstract | Purpose
To determine the risk factors and rate of medication administration error (MAE) alerts by analyzing large‐scale medication administration data and related error logs automatically recorded in a closed‐loop medication administration system using radio‐frequency identification and barcodes.
Methods
The subject hospital adopted a closed‐loop medication administration system. All medication administrations in the general wards were automatically recorded in real‐time using radio‐frequency identification, barcodes, and hand‐held point‐of‐care devices. MAE alert logs recorded during a full 1 year of 2012. We evaluated risk factors for MAE alerts including administration time, order type, medication route, the number of medication doses administered, and factors associated with nurse practices by logistic regression analysis.
Results
A total of 2 874 539 medication dose records from 30 232 patients (882.6 patient‐years) were included in 2012. We identified 35 082 MAE alerts (1.22% of total medication doses). The MAE alerts were significantly related to administration at non‐standard time [odds ratio (OR) 1.559, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.515–1.604], emergency order (OR 1.527, 95%CI 1.464–1.594), and the number of medication doses administered (OR 0.993, 95%CI 0.992–0.993). Medication route, nurse's employment duration, and working schedule were also significantly related.
Conclusion
The MAE alert rate was 1.22% over the 1‐year observation period in the hospital examined in this study. The MAE alerts were significantly related to administration time, order type, medication route, the number of medication doses administered, nurse's employment duration, and working schedule. The real‐time closed‐loop medication administration system contributed to improving patient safety by preventing potential MAEs. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
---|---|
AbstractList | To determine the risk factors and rate of medication administration error (MAE) alerts by analyzing large-scale medication administration data and related error logs automatically recorded in a closed-loop medication administration system using radio-frequency identification and barcodes.
The subject hospital adopted a closed-loop medication administration system. All medication administrations in the general wards were automatically recorded in real-time using radio-frequency identification, barcodes, and hand-held point-of-care devices. MAE alert logs recorded during a full 1 year of 2012. We evaluated risk factors for MAE alerts including administration time, order type, medication route, the number of medication doses administered, and factors associated with nurse practices by logistic regression analysis.
A total of 2 874 539 medication dose records from 30 232 patients (882.6 patient-years) were included in 2012. We identified 35 082 MAE alerts (1.22% of total medication doses). The MAE alerts were significantly related to administration at non-standard time [odds ratio (OR) 1.559, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.515-1.604], emergency order (OR 1.527, 95%CI 1.464-1.594), and the number of medication doses administered (OR 0.993, 95%CI 0.992-0.993). Medication route, nurse's employment duration, and working schedule were also significantly related.
The MAE alert rate was 1.22% over the 1-year observation period in the hospital examined in this study. The MAE alerts were significantly related to administration time, order type, medication route, the number of medication doses administered, nurse's employment duration, and working schedule. The real-time closed-loop medication administration system contributed to improving patient safety by preventing potential MAEs. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Purpose To determine the risk factors and rate of medication administration error (MAE) alerts by analyzing large‐scale medication administration data and related error logs automatically recorded in a closed‐loop medication administration system using radio‐frequency identification and barcodes. Methods The subject hospital adopted a closed‐loop medication administration system. All medication administrations in the general wards were automatically recorded in real‐time using radio‐frequency identification, barcodes, and hand‐held point‐of‐care devices. MAE alert logs recorded during a full 1 year of 2012. We evaluated risk factors for MAE alerts including administration time, order type, medication route, the number of medication doses administered, and factors associated with nurse practices by logistic regression analysis. Results A total of 2 874 539 medication dose records from 30 232 patients (882.6 patient‐years) were included in 2012. We identified 35 082 MAE alerts (1.22% of total medication doses). The MAE alerts were significantly related to administration at non‐standard time [odds ratio (OR) 1.559, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.515–1.604], emergency order (OR 1.527, 95%CI 1.464–1.594), and the number of medication doses administered (OR 0.993, 95%CI 0.992–0.993). Medication route, nurse's employment duration, and working schedule were also significantly related. Conclusion The MAE alert rate was 1.22% over the 1‐year observation period in the hospital examined in this study. The MAE alerts were significantly related to administration time, order type, medication route, the number of medication doses administered, nurse's employment duration, and working schedule. The real‐time closed‐loop medication administration system contributed to improving patient safety by preventing potential MAEs. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Purpose To determine the risk factors and rate of medication administration error (MAE) alerts by analyzing large-scale medication administration data and related error logs automatically recorded in a closed-loop medication administration system using radio-frequency identification and barcodes. Methods The subject hospital adopted a closed-loop medication administration system. All medication administrations in the general wards were automatically recorded in real-time using radio-frequency identification, barcodes, and hand-held point-of-care devices. MAE alert logs recorded during a full 1year of 2012. We evaluated risk factors for MAE alerts including administration time, order type, medication route, the number of medication doses administered, and factors associated with nurse practices by logistic regression analysis. Results A total of 2874539 medication dose records from 30232 patients (882.6 patient-years) were included in 2012. We identified 35082 MAE alerts (1.22% of total medication doses). The MAE alerts were significantly related to administration at non-standard time [odds ratio (OR) 1.559, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.515-1.604], emergency order (OR 1.527, 95%CI 1.464-1.594), and the number of medication doses administered (OR 0.993, 95%CI 0.992-0.993). Medication route, nurse's employment duration, and working schedule were also significantly related. Conclusion The MAE alert rate was 1.22% over the 1-year observation period in the hospital examined in this study. The MAE alerts were significantly related to administration time, order type, medication route, the number of medication doses administered, nurse's employment duration, and working schedule. The real-time closed-loop medication administration system contributed to improving patient safety by preventing potential MAEs. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Purpose To determine the risk factors and rate of medication administration error (MAE) alerts by analyzing large-scale medication administration data and related error logs automatically recorded in a closed-loop medication administration system using radio-frequency identification and barcodes. Methods The subject hospital adopted a closed-loop medication administration system. All medication administrations in the general wards were automatically recorded in real-time using radio-frequency identification, barcodes, and hand-held point-of-care devices. MAE alert logs recorded during a full 1year of 2012. We evaluated risk factors for MAE alerts including administration time, order type, medication route, the number of medication doses administered, and factors associated with nurse practices by logistic regression analysis. Results A total of 2874539 medication dose records from 30232 patients (882.6 patient-years) were included in 2012. We identified 35082 MAE alerts (1.22% of total medication doses). The MAE alerts were significantly related to administration at non-standard time [odds ratio (OR) 1.559, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.515-1.604], emergency order (OR 1.527, 95%CI 1.464-1.594), and the number of medication doses administered (OR 0.993, 95%CI 0.992-0.993). Medication route, nurse's employment duration, and working schedule were also significantly related. Conclusion The MAE alert rate was 1.22% over the 1-year observation period in the hospital examined in this study. The MAE alerts were significantly related to administration time, order type, medication route, the number of medication doses administered, nurse's employment duration, and working schedule. The real-time closed-loop medication administration system contributed to improving patient safety by preventing potential MAEs. To determine the risk factors and rate of medication administration error (MAE) alerts by analyzing large-scale medication administration data and related error logs automatically recorded in a closed-loop medication administration system using radio-frequency identification and barcodes.PURPOSETo determine the risk factors and rate of medication administration error (MAE) alerts by analyzing large-scale medication administration data and related error logs automatically recorded in a closed-loop medication administration system using radio-frequency identification and barcodes.The subject hospital adopted a closed-loop medication administration system. All medication administrations in the general wards were automatically recorded in real-time using radio-frequency identification, barcodes, and hand-held point-of-care devices. MAE alert logs recorded during a full 1 year of 2012. We evaluated risk factors for MAE alerts including administration time, order type, medication route, the number of medication doses administered, and factors associated with nurse practices by logistic regression analysis.METHODSThe subject hospital adopted a closed-loop medication administration system. All medication administrations in the general wards were automatically recorded in real-time using radio-frequency identification, barcodes, and hand-held point-of-care devices. MAE alert logs recorded during a full 1 year of 2012. We evaluated risk factors for MAE alerts including administration time, order type, medication route, the number of medication doses administered, and factors associated with nurse practices by logistic regression analysis.A total of 2 874 539 medication dose records from 30 232 patients (882.6 patient-years) were included in 2012. We identified 35 082 MAE alerts (1.22% of total medication doses). The MAE alerts were significantly related to administration at non-standard time [odds ratio (OR) 1.559, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.515-1.604], emergency order (OR 1.527, 95%CI 1.464-1.594), and the number of medication doses administered (OR 0.993, 95%CI 0.992-0.993). Medication route, nurse's employment duration, and working schedule were also significantly related.RESULTSA total of 2 874 539 medication dose records from 30 232 patients (882.6 patient-years) were included in 2012. We identified 35 082 MAE alerts (1.22% of total medication doses). The MAE alerts were significantly related to administration at non-standard time [odds ratio (OR) 1.559, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.515-1.604], emergency order (OR 1.527, 95%CI 1.464-1.594), and the number of medication doses administered (OR 0.993, 95%CI 0.992-0.993). Medication route, nurse's employment duration, and working schedule were also significantly related.The MAE alert rate was 1.22% over the 1-year observation period in the hospital examined in this study. The MAE alerts were significantly related to administration time, order type, medication route, the number of medication doses administered, nurse's employment duration, and working schedule. The real-time closed-loop medication administration system contributed to improving patient safety by preventing potential MAEs. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.CONCLUSIONThe MAE alert rate was 1.22% over the 1-year observation period in the hospital examined in this study. The MAE alerts were significantly related to administration time, order type, medication route, the number of medication doses administered, nurse's employment duration, and working schedule. The real-time closed-loop medication administration system contributed to improving patient safety by preventing potential MAEs. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Author | Yoon, Dukyong Park, Rae Woong Hwang, Hee Ahn, Eun Kyoung Hwang, Yeonsoo |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Yeonsoo surname: Hwang fullname: Hwang, Yeonsoo organization: Department of Biomedical Informatics, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea – sequence: 2 givenname: Dukyong surname: Yoon fullname: Yoon, Dukyong organization: Department of Biomedical Informatics, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea – sequence: 3 givenname: Eun Kyoung surname: Ahn fullname: Ahn, Eun Kyoung organization: Department of Biomedical Informatics, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea – sequence: 4 givenname: Hee surname: Hwang fullname: Hwang, Hee organization: Center for Medical Informatics, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea – sequence: 5 givenname: Rae Woong surname: Park fullname: Park, Rae Woong email: veritas@ajou.ac.kr, veritas@ajou.ac.kr organization: Department of Biomedical Informatics, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27465030$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqNkt9uFCEUxompsX808QkMiTfezMoMMAzemdatjZu10Rq9IyycaWiZYQsz2n2avqqM29Zo1HgFJ9-PL4fvnH2004ceEHpakllJSPVybdOMkbp5gPZKImVRci52pjunRcNruYv2U7ogJGuSPUK7lWA1J5TsoZvTGL46CxFHly5xq80QYsJtiLgD64weXOixtp3rXRritoQYs649xCG9wrrXfpMg4dBijb2O51Akk1VsfEhgCx_C-h9uaZMG6PCYXH-OP8xPjrKjxSsdTbDwGD1stU_w5PY8QJ_mb84O3xaL98cnh68XhWEVaQppSmEpryorDWlbxg0VVIJoK9nm0raMyqYiUGoiV1Q0mgI1xFDbMOB1JegBerH1XcdwNUIaVOeSAe91D2FMqmzqhjLGZfkfaFULympBMvr8N_QijDHnNVGMM9aQejJ8dkuNqxyTWkfX6bhRd1PKwGwLmBhSitAq44Yf4eUMnVclUdMaqLwGalqDny3eP7jz_ANabNFvzsPmr5w6Pfr4K58HCNf3vI6XKv9acPV5eazmZ8vFuy_LuVrS7_Aq0bk |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jaip_2019_04_050 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soncn_2022_151298 crossref_primary_10_1111_jocn_14485 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_procs_2023_03_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_profnurs_2022_02_008 crossref_primary_10_1097_NCQ_0000000000000491 crossref_primary_10_36290_far_2022_023 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_sapharm_2020_08_001 crossref_primary_10_1097_NR9_0000000000000028 crossref_primary_10_2478_fon_2018_0014 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10916_019_1269_6 crossref_primary_10_1097_NCQ_0000000000000446 crossref_primary_10_1111_nuf_12617 crossref_primary_10_2147_RMHP_S497454 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm10051104 crossref_primary_10_7739_jkafn_2021_28_2_149 crossref_primary_10_1002_jppr_1916 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40258_017_0360_8 crossref_primary_10_1097_CIN_0000000000001035 crossref_primary_10_1002_nop2_70139 crossref_primary_10_1097_PTS_0000000000000688 |
Cites_doi | 10.1001/jama.274.1.29 10.2146/ajhp060140 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.10.008 10.1097/01.ccm.0000198106.54306.d7 10.1093/intqhc/mzi015 10.1023/b:phar.0000006519.44483.a0 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pan.a004868 10.1186/1471-2288-12-78 10.1177/1054773806295241 10.1001/jama.290.12.1617 10.1093/ajhp/58.1.54 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002118 10.2165/00002018-200022040-00005 10.2146/ajhp080357 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2009.00151.x 10.1001/jama.299.18.2200 10.1197/jamia.M2616 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01573 10.1097/00005110-200101000-00007 10.4040/jkan.2012.42.4.568 10.1007/s001340050857 10.1056/NEJM199102073240604 10.1056/NEJMsa0907115 10.1345/aph.1R147 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03427.x 10.1136/qshc.2006.019497 10.1097/00129804-200503001-00005 10.2146/ajhp080355 10.1093/aje/kwg115 10.1002/sim.4780090710 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
DBID | BSCLL AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7TK K9. 7X8 7U7 C1K |
DOI | 10.1002/pds.4068 |
DatabaseName | Istex CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Neurosciences Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic Toxicology Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Neurosciences Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic Toxicology Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Toxicology Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Pharmacy, Therapeutics, & Pharmacology |
EISSN | 1099-1557 |
EndPage | 1396 |
ExternalDocumentID | 4268619041 27465030 10_1002_pds_4068 PDS4068 ark_67375_WNG_FTNLKXNF_N |
Genre | article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea funderid: HI14C3201 |
GroupedDBID | --- .3N .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 123 1L6 1OB 1OC 1ZS 31~ 33P 3SF 3WU 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52R 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 52X 53G 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A01 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHQN AAIPD AAMMB AAMNL AANHP AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAXRX AAYCA AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABEML ABIJN ABJNI ABPVW ABQWH ABXGK ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCZN ACFBH ACGFO ACGFS ACGOF ACMXC ACPOU ACPRK ACRPL ACSCC ACXBN ACXQS ACYXJ ADBBV ADBTR ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADNMO ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN AEFGJ AEGXH AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEUYR AEYWJ AFBPY AFFPM AFGKR AFRAH AFWVQ AFZJQ AGHNM AGQPQ AGXDD AGYGG AHBTC AHMBA AIACR AIAGR AIDQK AIDYY AIQQE AITYG AIURR ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ATUGU AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMXJE BROTX BRXPI BSCLL BY8 C45 CS3 D-6 D-7 D-E D-F DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DU5 EBD EBS EJD EMOBN F00 F01 F04 F5P FEDTE FUBAC G-S G.N GNP GODZA GWYGA H.X HF~ HGLYW HHZ HVGLF HZ~ IX1 J0M JPC KBYEO KQQ LATKE LAW LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LSO LUTES LW6 LYRES M6Q MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ NNB O66 O9- OIG OVD P2P P2W P2X P2Z P4B P4D PALCI PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 QRW R.K RIWAO RJQFR ROL RX1 RYL SAMSI SUPJJ SV3 TEORI UB1 V8K W8V W99 WBKPD WHWMO WIB WIH WIJ WIK WJL WOHZO WQJ WVDHM WXI WXSBR XG1 XV2 ZZTAW ~IA ~WT AAHHS ACCFJ AEEZP AEQDE AEUQT AFPWT AIWBW AJBDE RWI WRC WUP WWP YCJ AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7TK K9. 7X8 7U7 C1K |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c4208-9c17d3522d9c0ff45c3739e7f29fff4df439820e1a09b378a3e3c0c3d84e56273 |
IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
ISSN | 1053-8569 1099-1557 |
IngestDate | Fri Sep 05 03:38:04 EDT 2025 Thu Sep 04 17:23:31 EDT 2025 Sun Jul 13 05:28:47 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 06:56:32 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:29:19 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:52:18 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 17:08:08 EST 2025 Sun Sep 21 06:14:53 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 12 |
Keywords | point-of-care system patient safety closed-loop medication administration radio-frequency identification (RFID) medication error pharmacoepidemiology |
Language | English |
License | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4208-9c17d3522d9c0ff45c3739e7f29fff4df439820e1a09b378a3e3c0c3d84e56273 |
Notes | Supporting info item ark:/67375/WNG-FTNLKXNF-N istex:11364CE215FF0E192117C56A322F791C6BC21F1C ArticleID:PDS4068 Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea - No. HI14C3201 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
PMID | 27465030 |
PQID | 1845448061 |
PQPubID | 105383 |
PageCount | 10 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1868344591 proquest_miscellaneous_1826734670 proquest_journals_1845448061 pubmed_primary_27465030 crossref_citationtrail_10_1002_pds_4068 crossref_primary_10_1002_pds_4068 wiley_primary_10_1002_pds_4068_PDS4068 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_FTNLKXNF_N |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2016-12 December 2016 2016-12-00 20161201 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2016-12-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2016 text: 2016-12 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: Bethesda |
PublicationTitle | Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf |
PublicationYear | 2016 |
Publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
References | Dean B, Barber N. Validity and reliability of observational methods for studying medication administration errors. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2001; 58: 54-59. Agrawal A. Medication errors: prevention using information technology systems. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2009; 67: 681-686. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03427.x. Helmons PJ, Wargel LN, Daniels CE. Effect of bar-code-assisted medication administration on medication administration errors and accuracy in multiple patient care areas. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2009; 66: 1202-1210. doi:10.2146/ajhp080357. Poon EG, Keohane CA, Yoon CS, et al. Effect of bar-code technology on the safety of medication administration. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1698-1707. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa0907115. Kopp BJ, Erstad BL, Allen ME, et al. Medication errors and adverse drug events in an intensive care unit: direct observation approach for detection. Crit Care Med 2006; 34: 415-425. doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000198106.54306.d7. Scott-Cawiezell J, Pepper GA, Madsen RW, et al. Nursing home error and level of staff credentials. Clin Nurs Res 2007; 16: 72-78. doi:10.1177/1054773806295241. Tissot E, Cornette C, Demoly P, et al. Medication errors at the administration stage in an intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med 1999; 25: 353-359. doi:10.1007/s001340050857. Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, et al. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med 1991; 324: 370-376. doi:10.1056/NEJM199102073240604. Akiyama M, Koshio A, Kaihotsu N. Analysis of data captured by barcode medication administration system using a PDA; aiming at reducing medication errors at point of care in Japanese Red Cross Kochi Hospital. Stud Health Technol Inform 2010; 160: 774-778. Aspden P, Wolcott J, Bootman JL, et al. Committee on Identifying and Preventing Medication Errors, Institute of Medicine: Preventing Medication Errors, Quality Chasm Series. National Academies Press: Washington, DC, 2007. Biron AD, Loiselle CG, Lavoie-Tremblay M. Work interruptions and their contribution to medication administration errors: an evidence review. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2009; 6: 70-86. doi:10.1111/j.1741-6787.2009.00151.x. Welp A, Meier LL, Manser T. Emotional exhaustion and workload predict clinician-rated and objective patient safety. Front Psychol 2014; 5: 1573. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01573. King G, Zeng L. Logistic regression in rare events data. Polit Anal 2001; 9: 137-163. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pan.a004868. Hochberg Y, Benjamini Y. More powerful procedures for multiple significance testing. Stat Med 1990; 9: 811-818. doi:10.1002/sim.4780090710. Franklin BD, O'Grady K, Donyai P, et al. The impact of a closed-loop electronic prescribing and administration system on prescribing errors, administration errors and staff time: a before-and-after study. Qual Saf Health Care 2007; 16: 279-284. doi:10.1136/qshc.2006.019497. Paoletti RD, Suess TM, Lesko MG, et al. Using bar-code technology and medication observation methodology for safer medication administration. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2007; 64: 536-543. doi:10.2146/ajhp060140. Tissot E, Cornette C, Limat S, et al. Observational study of potential risk factors of medication administration errors. Pharm World Sci 2003; 25: 264-268. doi:10.1023/b:phar.0000006519.44483.a0. Blegen MA, Vaughn TE, Goode CJ. Nurse experience and education: effect on quality of care. J Nurs Adm 2001; 31: 33-39. Cepeda MS, Boston R, Farrar JT, et al. Comparison of logistic regression versus propensity score when the number of events is low and there are multiple confounders. Am J Epidemiol 2003; 158: 280-287. doi:10.1093/aje/kwg115. Lisby M, Nielsen LP, Mainz J. Errors in the medication process: frequency, type, and potential clinical consequences. Int J Qual Health Care 2005; 17: 15-22. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzi015. Clayton M. The right way to prevent medication errors. RN 1987; 50: 30-31. Fagerland MW. t-tests, non-parametric tests, and large studies-a paradox of statistical practice? BMC Med Res Methodol 2012; 12: 78. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-78. Aiken LH, Clarke SP, Cheung RB, et al. Educational levels of hospital nurses and surgical patient mortality. JAMA 2003; 290: 1617-1623. doi:10.1001/jama.290.12.1617. Keers RN, Williams SD, Cooke J, et al. Prevalence and nature of medication administration errors in health care settings: a systematic review of direct observational evidence. Ann Pharmacother 2013; 47: 237-256. doi:10.1345/aph.1R147. van den Bemt PM, Egberts TC, de Jong-van den Berg LT, et al. Drug-related problems in hospitalised patients. Drug Saf 2000; 22: 321-333. doi:10.2165/00002018-200022040-00005. Peris-Lopez P, Orfila A, Mitrokotsa A, et al. A comprehensive RFID solution to enhance inpatient medication safety. Int J Med Inform 2011; 80: 13-24. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.10.008. Hughes RG, Ortiz E. Medication errors: why they happen, and how they can be prevented. J Infus Nurs 2005; 28: 14-24. doi:10.1097/00129804-200503001-00005. Raban MZ, Westbrook JI. Are interventions to reduce interruptions and errors during medication administration effective?: a systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf 2014; 23: 414-421. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002118. DeYoung JL, Vanderkooi ME, Barletta JF. Effect of bar-code-assisted medication administration on medication error rates in an adult medical intensive care unit. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2009; 66: 1110-1115. doi:10.2146/ajhp080355. Kim MS. Medication error management climate and perception for system use according to construction of medication error prevention system. J Korean Acad Nurs 2012; 42: 568-578. doi:10.4040/jkan.2012.42.4.568. Koppel R, Wetterneck T, Telles JL, et al. Workarounds to barcode medication administration systems: their occurrences, causes, and threats to patient safety. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008; 15: 408-423. doi:10.1197/jamia.M2616. Bates DW, Cullen DJ, Laird N, et al. Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events. Implications for prevention. ADE Prevention Study Group. JAMA 1995; 274: 29-34. doi:10.1001/jama.274.1.29. Cescon DW, Etchells E. Barcoded medication administration: a last line of defense. JAMA 2008; 299: 2200-2202. doi:10.1001/jama.299.18.2200. Kohn LT, Corrigan J, Donaldson MS. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. National Academy Press: Washington, DC, 2000; 10.17226/9728. 2009; 67 2009; 66 2013; 47 2006; 34 1987; 50 2011; 80 2000; 22 1999; 25 2008; 15 2007 2010; 362 2003; 290 2004 2010; 160 1995; 274 2003; 158 2005; 28 2012; 12 2014; 23 2007; 16 2014; 5 2000 2001; 9 2003; 25 2015 2009; 6 2008; 299 2007; 64 2005; 17 1990; 9 1991; 324 2001; 58 2012; 42 2001; 31 e_1_2_9_30_1 e_1_2_9_31_1 e_1_2_9_11_1 e_1_2_9_34_1 Aspden P (e_1_2_9_5_1) 2007 e_1_2_9_10_1 e_1_2_9_35_1 Clayton M (e_1_2_9_12_1) 1987; 50 e_1_2_9_13_1 e_1_2_9_32_1 e_1_2_9_33_1 Kohn LT (e_1_2_9_2_1) 2000 e_1_2_9_15_1 e_1_2_9_14_1 e_1_2_9_17_1 e_1_2_9_36_1 e_1_2_9_16_1 e_1_2_9_37_1 e_1_2_9_19_1 e_1_2_9_18_1 Akiyama M (e_1_2_9_25_1) 2010; 160 e_1_2_9_20_1 e_1_2_9_22_1 e_1_2_9_21_1 e_1_2_9_24_1 e_1_2_9_23_1 e_1_2_9_8_1 e_1_2_9_7_1 e_1_2_9_6_1 e_1_2_9_4_1 e_1_2_9_3_1 e_1_2_9_9_1 e_1_2_9_26_1 e_1_2_9_28_1 e_1_2_9_27_1 e_1_2_9_29_1 |
References_xml | – reference: King G, Zeng L. Logistic regression in rare events data. Polit Anal 2001; 9: 137-163. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pan.a004868. – reference: Akiyama M, Koshio A, Kaihotsu N. Analysis of data captured by barcode medication administration system using a PDA; aiming at reducing medication errors at point of care in Japanese Red Cross Kochi Hospital. Stud Health Technol Inform 2010; 160: 774-778. – reference: Blegen MA, Vaughn TE, Goode CJ. Nurse experience and education: effect on quality of care. J Nurs Adm 2001; 31: 33-39. – reference: Lisby M, Nielsen LP, Mainz J. Errors in the medication process: frequency, type, and potential clinical consequences. Int J Qual Health Care 2005; 17: 15-22. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzi015. – reference: Tissot E, Cornette C, Limat S, et al. Observational study of potential risk factors of medication administration errors. Pharm World Sci 2003; 25: 264-268. doi:10.1023/b:phar.0000006519.44483.a0. – reference: Biron AD, Loiselle CG, Lavoie-Tremblay M. Work interruptions and their contribution to medication administration errors: an evidence review. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2009; 6: 70-86. doi:10.1111/j.1741-6787.2009.00151.x. – reference: Kim MS. Medication error management climate and perception for system use according to construction of medication error prevention system. J Korean Acad Nurs 2012; 42: 568-578. doi:10.4040/jkan.2012.42.4.568. – reference: Bates DW, Cullen DJ, Laird N, et al. Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events. Implications for prevention. ADE Prevention Study Group. JAMA 1995; 274: 29-34. doi:10.1001/jama.274.1.29. – reference: Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, et al. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med 1991; 324: 370-376. doi:10.1056/NEJM199102073240604. – reference: Clayton M. The right way to prevent medication errors. RN 1987; 50: 30-31. – reference: Poon EG, Keohane CA, Yoon CS, et al. Effect of bar-code technology on the safety of medication administration. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1698-1707. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa0907115. – reference: Peris-Lopez P, Orfila A, Mitrokotsa A, et al. A comprehensive RFID solution to enhance inpatient medication safety. Int J Med Inform 2011; 80: 13-24. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.10.008. – reference: Hochberg Y, Benjamini Y. More powerful procedures for multiple significance testing. Stat Med 1990; 9: 811-818. doi:10.1002/sim.4780090710. – reference: Scott-Cawiezell J, Pepper GA, Madsen RW, et al. Nursing home error and level of staff credentials. Clin Nurs Res 2007; 16: 72-78. doi:10.1177/1054773806295241. – reference: Aspden P, Wolcott J, Bootman JL, et al. Committee on Identifying and Preventing Medication Errors, Institute of Medicine: Preventing Medication Errors, Quality Chasm Series. National Academies Press: Washington, DC, 2007. – reference: Franklin BD, O'Grady K, Donyai P, et al. The impact of a closed-loop electronic prescribing and administration system on prescribing errors, administration errors and staff time: a before-and-after study. Qual Saf Health Care 2007; 16: 279-284. doi:10.1136/qshc.2006.019497. – reference: Cescon DW, Etchells E. Barcoded medication administration: a last line of defense. JAMA 2008; 299: 2200-2202. doi:10.1001/jama.299.18.2200. – reference: Keers RN, Williams SD, Cooke J, et al. Prevalence and nature of medication administration errors in health care settings: a systematic review of direct observational evidence. Ann Pharmacother 2013; 47: 237-256. doi:10.1345/aph.1R147. – reference: Kopp BJ, Erstad BL, Allen ME, et al. Medication errors and adverse drug events in an intensive care unit: direct observation approach for detection. Crit Care Med 2006; 34: 415-425. doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000198106.54306.d7. – reference: Welp A, Meier LL, Manser T. Emotional exhaustion and workload predict clinician-rated and objective patient safety. Front Psychol 2014; 5: 1573. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01573. – reference: Koppel R, Wetterneck T, Telles JL, et al. Workarounds to barcode medication administration systems: their occurrences, causes, and threats to patient safety. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008; 15: 408-423. doi:10.1197/jamia.M2616. – reference: DeYoung JL, Vanderkooi ME, Barletta JF. Effect of bar-code-assisted medication administration on medication error rates in an adult medical intensive care unit. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2009; 66: 1110-1115. doi:10.2146/ajhp080355. – reference: Kohn LT, Corrigan J, Donaldson MS. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. National Academy Press: Washington, DC, 2000; 10.17226/9728. – reference: Hughes RG, Ortiz E. Medication errors: why they happen, and how they can be prevented. J Infus Nurs 2005; 28: 14-24. doi:10.1097/00129804-200503001-00005. – reference: Aiken LH, Clarke SP, Cheung RB, et al. Educational levels of hospital nurses and surgical patient mortality. JAMA 2003; 290: 1617-1623. doi:10.1001/jama.290.12.1617. – reference: van den Bemt PM, Egberts TC, de Jong-van den Berg LT, et al. Drug-related problems in hospitalised patients. Drug Saf 2000; 22: 321-333. doi:10.2165/00002018-200022040-00005. – reference: Raban MZ, Westbrook JI. Are interventions to reduce interruptions and errors during medication administration effective?: a systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf 2014; 23: 414-421. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002118. – reference: Fagerland MW. t-tests, non-parametric tests, and large studies-a paradox of statistical practice? BMC Med Res Methodol 2012; 12: 78. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-78. – reference: Paoletti RD, Suess TM, Lesko MG, et al. Using bar-code technology and medication observation methodology for safer medication administration. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2007; 64: 536-543. doi:10.2146/ajhp060140. – reference: Helmons PJ, Wargel LN, Daniels CE. Effect of bar-code-assisted medication administration on medication administration errors and accuracy in multiple patient care areas. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2009; 66: 1202-1210. doi:10.2146/ajhp080357. – reference: Tissot E, Cornette C, Demoly P, et al. Medication errors at the administration stage in an intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med 1999; 25: 353-359. doi:10.1007/s001340050857. – reference: Agrawal A. Medication errors: prevention using information technology systems. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2009; 67: 681-686. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03427.x. – reference: Dean B, Barber N. Validity and reliability of observational methods for studying medication administration errors. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2001; 58: 54-59. – reference: Cepeda MS, Boston R, Farrar JT, et al. Comparison of logistic regression versus propensity score when the number of events is low and there are multiple confounders. Am J Epidemiol 2003; 158: 280-287. doi:10.1093/aje/kwg115. – volume: 9 start-page: 811 year: 1990 end-page: 818 article-title: More powerful procedures for multiple significance testing publication-title: Stat Med – volume: 34 start-page: 415 year: 2006 end-page: 425 article-title: Medication errors and adverse drug events in an intensive care unit: direct observation approach for detection publication-title: Crit Care Med – volume: 22 start-page: 321 year: 2000 end-page: 333 article-title: Drug‐related problems in hospitalised patients publication-title: Drug Saf – volume: 25 start-page: 353 year: 1999 end-page: 359 article-title: Medication errors at the administration stage in an intensive care unit publication-title: Intensive Care Med – volume: 64 start-page: 536 year: 2007 end-page: 543 article-title: Using bar‐code technology and medication observation methodology for safer medication administration publication-title: Am J Health Syst Pharm – volume: 28 start-page: 14 year: 2005 end-page: 24 article-title: Medication errors: why they happen, and how they can be prevented publication-title: J Infus Nurs – volume: 5 start-page: 1573 year: 2014 article-title: Emotional exhaustion and workload predict clinician‐rated and objective patient safety publication-title: Front Psychol – volume: 23 start-page: 414 year: 2014 end-page: 421 article-title: Are interventions to reduce interruptions and errors during medication administration effective?: a systematic review publication-title: BMJ Qual Saf – year: 2007 – volume: 67 start-page: 681 year: 2009 end-page: 686 article-title: Medication errors: prevention using information technology systems publication-title: Br J Clin Pharmacol – volume: 16 start-page: 72 year: 2007 end-page: 78 article-title: Nursing home error and level of staff credentials publication-title: Clin Nurs Res – volume: 17 start-page: 15 year: 2005 end-page: 22 article-title: Errors in the medication process: frequency, type, and potential clinical consequences publication-title: Int J Qual Health Care – volume: 12 start-page: 78 year: 2012 article-title: ‐tests, non‐parametric tests, and large studies—a paradox of statistical practice? publication-title: BMC Med Res Methodol – volume: 16 start-page: 279 year: 2007 end-page: 284 article-title: The impact of a closed‐loop electronic prescribing and administration system on prescribing errors, administration errors and staff time: a before‐and‐after study publication-title: Qual Saf Health Care – volume: 15 start-page: 408 year: 2008 end-page: 423 article-title: Workarounds to barcode medication administration systems: their occurrences, causes, and threats to patient safety publication-title: J Am Med Inform Assoc – volume: 6 start-page: 70 year: 2009 end-page: 86 article-title: Work interruptions and their contribution to medication administration errors: an evidence review publication-title: Worldviews Evid Based Nurs – volume: 58 start-page: 54 year: 2001 end-page: 59 article-title: Validity and reliability of observational methods for studying medication administration errors publication-title: Am J Health Syst Pharm – volume: 31 start-page: 33 year: 2001 end-page: 39 article-title: Nurse experience and education: effect on quality of care publication-title: J Nurs Adm – volume: 299 start-page: 2200 year: 2008 end-page: 2202 article-title: Barcoded medication administration: a last line of defense publication-title: JAMA – volume: 80 start-page: 13 year: 2011 end-page: 24 article-title: A comprehensive RFID solution to enhance inpatient medication safety publication-title: Int J Med Inform – volume: 290 start-page: 1617 year: 2003 end-page: 1623 article-title: Educational levels of hospital nurses and surgical patient mortality publication-title: JAMA – volume: 25 start-page: 264 year: 2003 end-page: 268 article-title: Observational study of potential risk factors of medication administration errors publication-title: Pharm World Sci – volume: 362 start-page: 1698 year: 2010 end-page: 1707 article-title: Effect of bar‐code technology on the safety of medication administration publication-title: N Engl J Med – volume: 66 start-page: 1110 year: 2009 end-page: 1115 article-title: Effect of bar‐code‐assisted medication administration on medication error rates in an adult medical intensive care unit publication-title: Am J Health Syst Pharm – volume: 50 start-page: 30 year: 1987 end-page: 31 article-title: The right way to prevent medication errors publication-title: RN – start-page: 10.17226/9728 year: 2000 – volume: 42 start-page: 568 year: 2012 end-page: 578 article-title: Medication error management climate and perception for system use according to construction of medication error prevention system publication-title: J Korean Acad Nurs – volume: 66 start-page: 1202 year: 2009 end-page: 1210 article-title: Effect of bar‐code‐assisted medication administration on medication administration errors and accuracy in multiple patient care areas publication-title: Am J Health Syst Pharm – year: 2004 – volume: 9 start-page: 137 year: 2001 end-page: 163 article-title: Logistic regression in rare events data publication-title: Polit Anal – volume: 158 start-page: 280 year: 2003 end-page: 287 article-title: Comparison of logistic regression versus propensity score when the number of events is low and there are multiple confounders publication-title: Am J Epidemiol – volume: 324 start-page: 370 year: 1991 end-page: 376 article-title: Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I publication-title: N Engl J Med – volume: 274 start-page: 29 year: 1995 end-page: 34 article-title: Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events. Implications for prevention. ADE Prevention Study Group publication-title: JAMA – volume: 47 start-page: 237 year: 2013 end-page: 256 article-title: Prevalence and nature of medication administration errors in health care settings: a systematic review of direct observational evidence publication-title: Ann Pharmacother – year: 2015 – volume: 160 start-page: 774 year: 2010 end-page: 778 article-title: Analysis of data captured by barcode medication administration system using a PDA; aiming at reducing medication errors at point of care in Japanese Red Cross Kochi Hospital publication-title: Stud Health Technol Inform – ident: e_1_2_9_3_1 doi: 10.1001/jama.274.1.29 – ident: e_1_2_9_15_1 doi: 10.2146/ajhp060140 – ident: e_1_2_9_19_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.10.008 – ident: e_1_2_9_34_1 doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000198106.54306.d7 – ident: e_1_2_9_8_1 doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzi015 – ident: e_1_2_9_26_1 doi: 10.1023/b:phar.0000006519.44483.a0 – ident: e_1_2_9_32_1 doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pan.a004868 – ident: e_1_2_9_28_1 doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-78 – ident: e_1_2_9_24_1 doi: 10.1177/1054773806295241 – ident: e_1_2_9_35_1 doi: 10.1001/jama.290.12.1617 – ident: e_1_2_9_33_1 doi: 10.1093/ajhp/58.1.54 – ident: e_1_2_9_22_1 doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002118 – ident: e_1_2_9_11_1 doi: 10.2165/00002018-200022040-00005 – ident: e_1_2_9_13_1 doi: 10.2146/ajhp080357 – ident: e_1_2_9_23_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2009.00151.x – volume: 50 start-page: 30 year: 1987 ident: e_1_2_9_12_1 article-title: The right way to prevent medication errors publication-title: RN – ident: e_1_2_9_10_1 doi: 10.1001/jama.299.18.2200 – ident: e_1_2_9_9_1 doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2616 – ident: e_1_2_9_37_1 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01573 – ident: e_1_2_9_36_1 doi: 10.1097/00005110-200101000-00007 – ident: e_1_2_9_17_1 doi: 10.4040/jkan.2012.42.4.568 – ident: e_1_2_9_27_1 doi: 10.1007/s001340050857 – ident: e_1_2_9_4_1 doi: 10.1056/NEJM199102073240604 – ident: e_1_2_9_6_1 doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0907115 – ident: e_1_2_9_21_1 doi: 10.1345/aph.1R147 – volume: 160 start-page: 774 year: 2010 ident: e_1_2_9_25_1 article-title: Analysis of data captured by barcode medication administration system using a PDA; aiming at reducing medication errors at point of care in Japanese Red Cross Kochi Hospital publication-title: Stud Health Technol Inform – ident: e_1_2_9_7_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03427.x – ident: e_1_2_9_16_1 doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.019497 – ident: e_1_2_9_20_1 doi: 10.1097/00129804-200503001-00005 – ident: e_1_2_9_18_1 – start-page: 10.17226/9728 volume-title: To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System year: 2000 ident: e_1_2_9_2_1 – ident: e_1_2_9_14_1 doi: 10.2146/ajhp080355 – ident: e_1_2_9_31_1 doi: 10.1093/aje/kwg115 – volume-title: Committee on Identifying and Preventing Medication Errors, Institute of Medicine: Preventing Medication Errors, Quality Chasm Series year: 2007 ident: e_1_2_9_5_1 – ident: e_1_2_9_30_1 doi: 10.1002/sim.4780090710 – ident: e_1_2_9_29_1 |
SSID | ssj0009994 |
Score | 2.2802107 |
Snippet | Purpose
To determine the risk factors and rate of medication administration error (MAE) alerts by analyzing large‐scale medication administration data and... To determine the risk factors and rate of medication administration error (MAE) alerts by analyzing large-scale medication administration data and related... Purpose To determine the risk factors and rate of medication administration error (MAE) alerts by analyzing large-scale medication administration data and... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref wiley istex |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 1387 |
SubjectTerms | Automatic Data Processing closed-loop medication administration Humans Logistic Models Medical errors Medical Order Entry Systems medication error Medication Errors - prevention & control Medication Errors - statistics & numerical data Medication Systems, Hospital Nurses - organization & administration patient safety Pharmaceutical Preparations - administration & dosage pharmacoepidemiology point-of-care system Point-of-Care Systems Prescription drugs Radio frequency identification Radio Frequency Identification Device radio-frequency identification (RFID) Risk Factors Time Factors Work Schedule Tolerance |
Title | Provider risk factors for medication administration error alerts: analyses of a large-scale closed-loop medication administration system using RFID and barcode |
URI | https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-FTNLKXNF-N/fulltext.pdf https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fpds.4068 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27465030 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1845448061 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1826734670 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1868344591 |
Volume | 25 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVWIB databaseName: Wiley Online Library - Core collection (SURFmarket) issn: 1053-8569 databaseCode: DR2 dateStart: 19960101 customDbUrl: isFulltext: true eissn: 1099-1557 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0009994 providerName: Wiley-Blackwell |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3LbtNAFB2hsmHD-xEo6CKhsKlT2-OxY3YVxZSHrKikIhKL0bzMolEc2YlEWfEJ_EP_rF_SO-NHFFQqxMqyfD1-zLm-Z3zvnCHklVSI3FAFnkz8CAcoY4E-J5mXKmpYqosg1q7KN4-PTqKPMzZrqyrtXJhGH6L_4WY9w32vrYMLWe9vREOXuh5hNLLzfAPKXIb2eKMchbzHJZQRY96YxWmnO-uH-92JW5Hopn2pP66imdus1YWd7A751t1wU21yOlqv5Ej9_EPL8f-e6C653bJROGjgc4_cMIv7ZDhp5KzP9mC6mZ1V78EQJhuh67MH5HzSTuMDW6AO7dI9gDQYXMredTqILXleMFWFxzEsVav6DQiniWJqKAsQMLdl6Re_ftcIHANqXtZG4-68LJfXtNiIUYOt4P8Ox9mHQ2xVg0QPLrV5SE6yd9O3R1676IOnbKYfQRIk2rJCnSq_KCKmaEJTkxRhWuCuLpBBIWsxgfBTSZOxoIYqX1E9jgxyuYQ-IjuLcmGeEFAINd-kTCJJiqJISKGUbxITF0GBxFUNyOsOAFy1iuh2YY45b7ScQ449wm2PDMjL3nLZqIBcYTN0GOoNRHVqq-YSxr_m73k2zT9_muUZzwdktwMZbz8YNceBNsORMrIrvFZ_GF3d5m_EwpRraxNiexjZ_OtsYrtyCkuxnccNgPsbCpMI-TjFs4cOhn99FD45_GK3T__V8Bm5hUQybsp8dsnOqlqb50jWVvKFc8tLp4xBMQ |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3LjtMwFLWGmQVseD8KA1wkVDaTTl7OA1aIEjpMiaqhI7pAshzbYTFVUyWtxLDiE_gH_owv4dp5VEXDCLGKotw4D5-be5x7fUzI80wgcl3hWFlo-zhAiTj6XEatWHiKxjJ3AmmqfNNgdOq_n9HZDnnVzoWp9SG6H27aM8z3Wju4_iF9uFENXcpqgOEoukL2dHpOe-XwZKMdhczHpJQRZVZEg7hVnrXdw_bMrVi0p1_r14uI5jZvNYEnuUE-t7dc15ucDdarbCC-_aHm-J_PdJNcbwgpvK4RdIvsqMVt0p_UitbnBzDdTNCqDqAPk43W9fkd8nPSzOQDXaMOzeo9gEwYTNbe9DvwLYVeUGWJxzEylavqJXAji6IqKHLgMNeV6b--_6gQOwrEvKiUxN15USwvabHWowZdxP8FTpKjIbYqIUMnLqS6S06Tt9M3I6tZ98ESOtmPOHFCqYmhjIWd5z4VXujFKszdOMddmSOJQuKiHG7HmRdG3FOesIUnI18hnQu9e2R3USzUAwIC0WarmGbIk3zf5xkXwlahCnInR-4qeuRFiwAmGlF0vTbHnNVyzi7DHmG6R3rkWWe5rIVALrDpGxB1Brw804VzIWWf0ncsmabj41masLRH9luUseabUTEca1McLCPBwmt1h9HbdQqHL1Sx1jYutofBzb7MJtCLp9AY27lfI7i7ITf0kZJ7eHbf4PCvj8Imw496-_BfDZ-Sq6PphzEbH6XHj8g15JVBXfWzT3ZX5Vo9Ru62yp4YH_0NfjlFTQ |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3LbtQwFLWglRAbypspBS4SGjbNNO8HO8QQWlpFUZmKkbqwHD9YdDQZJTMSZcUn8A_8GV_CtfMYDSoVYhVZuXYePjf3OL4-JuRVwRG5LnesIrJ9HKDEDH2uCKyEezJIhHJCYbJ8s_DwzP84DaZtVqVeC9PoQ_Q_3LRnmO-1dvCFUAdr0dCFqEcYjeKbZNsPcXClCdHpWjoKiY-ZUUaQWXEQJp3wrO0edDU3QtG2fqtfr-KZm7TVxJ10h5x3d9ykm1yMVstixL_9Ieb4f490l9xp6Si8bfBzj9yQ8_tkmDd61pf7MFkvz6r3YQj5Wun68gH5mbfr-EBnqEO7dw8gDwYzZ296HdiGPi_IqsLzGJeqZf0GmBFFkTWUChjMdF76r-8_akSOBD4raymwOCvLxTUtNmrUoFP4v8BpejTGVgUU6MKlkA_JWfp-8u7Qand9sLie6keUOJHQtFAk3FbKD7gXeYmMlJsoLAqFFAppi3SYnRReFDNPetzmnoh9iWQu8h6RrXk5l08IcMSaLZOgQJbk-z4rGOe2jGSoHIXMlQ_I6w4AlLeS6HpnjhltxJxdij1CdY8MyMvectHIgFxhMzQY6g1YdaHT5qKAfs4-0HSSnRxPs5RmA7LXgYy2X4ya4kg7wKEy0iu8Vn8afV1P4LC5LFfaxsX2MLTZ19mEeuuUIMF2HjcA7m_IjXwk5B7WHhoY_vVRaD7-pI-7_2r4gtzKxyk9OcqOn5LbSCrDJuVnj2wtq5V8hsRtWTw3HvobjA5D_A |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Provider+risk+factors+for+medication+administration+error+alerts%3A+analyses+of+a+large%E2%80%90scale+closed%E2%80%90loop+medication+administration+system+using+RFID+and+barcode&rft.jtitle=Pharmacoepidemiology+and+drug+safety&rft.au=Hwang%2C+Yeonsoo&rft.au=Yoon%2C+Dukyong&rft.au=Ahn%2C+Eun+Kyoung&rft.au=Hwang%2C+Hee&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.issn=1053-8569&rft.eissn=1099-1557&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1387&rft.epage=1396&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fpds.4068&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1002_pds_4068 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1053-8569&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1053-8569&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1053-8569&client=summon |