Calculation of soil water content using dielectric-permittivity-based sensors – benefits of soil-specific calibration
Soil water content (SWC) sensors are widely used for scientific studies or for the management of agricultural practices. The most common sensing techniques provide an estimate of volumetric soil water content based on sensing of dielectric permittivity. These techniques include frequency domain refl...
Saved in:
| Published in | Geoscientific instrumentation, methods and data systems Vol. 12; no. 1; pp. 45 - 56 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Gottingen
Copernicus GmbH
30.01.2023
European Geosciences Union Copernicus Publications |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 2193-0864 2193-0856 2193-0864 2193-0854 |
| DOI | 10.5194/gi-12-45-2023 |
Cover
| Summary: | Soil water content (SWC) sensors are widely used for
scientific studies or for the management of agricultural practices. The most
common sensing techniques provide an estimate of volumetric soil water
content based on sensing of dielectric permittivity. These techniques
include frequency domain reflectometry (FDR), time domain reflectometry
(TDR), capacitance and even remote-sensing techniques such as
ground-penetrating radar (GPR) and microwave-based techniques. Here, we will
focus on frequency domain reflectometry (FDR) sensors and more specifically
on the questioning of their factory calibration, which does not take into
account soil-specific features and therefore possibly leads to inconsistent
SWC estimates. We conducted the present study in the southwest of France
on two plots that are part of the ICOS ERIC network (Integrated Carbon
Observation System, European Research and Infrastructure Consortium), FR-Lam
and FR-Aur. We propose a simple protocol for soil-specific calibration,
particularly suitable for clayey soil, to improve the accuracy of SWC
determination when using commercial FDR sensors. We compared the sensing
accuracy after soil-specific calibration versus factory calibration. Our
results stress the necessity of performing a thorough soil-specific
calibration for very clayey soils. Hence, locally, we found that factory
calibration results in a strong overestimation of the actual soil water
content. Indeed, we report relative errors as large as +115 % with a
factory-calibrated sensor based on the real part of dielectric permittivity
and up to + 245 % with a factory-calibrated sensor based on the modulus
of dielectric permittivity. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
| ISSN: | 2193-0864 2193-0856 2193-0864 2193-0854 |
| DOI: | 10.5194/gi-12-45-2023 |