Spatial difference can occur between activated and damaged muscle areas following electrically‐induced isometric contractions

• Published in: The Journal of physiology Vol. 597; no. 16; pp. 4227 - 4236
• Main Authors: Fouré, Alexandre, Troter, Arnaud, Ogier, Augustin C., Guye, Maxime, Gondin, Julien, Bendahan, David
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.08.2019; Wiley
• Subjects: Electrical stimuli; Human health and pathology; Life Sciences; Localization; Magnetic resonance imaging; MRI; muscle activation; Muscle contraction; muscle damage; Musculoskeletal system; Neuromuscular electrical stimulation; neuromuscular electrostimulation; Skeletal muscle; Statistical analysis; thigh muscles; Tissues and Organs; thigh muscles; neuromuscular electrostimulation; muscle activation; MRI; muscle damage
• ISSN: 0022-3751; 1469-7793; 1469-7793
• DOI: 10.1113/JP278205

Key points T2 mapping combined to image registration and statistical parametric mapping analysis is a suitable methodology to accurately localize and compare the extent of both activated and damaged muscle areas. Activated muscle areas following electrically‐induced isometric contractions are superficial, but damaged regions are muscle specific and can be related to the muscle morphology and/or the relative spatial position within a muscle group leading to potential intramuscular muscle shear strain. Tissues other than active skeletal muscle fibres can be altered during unaccustomed neuromuscular electrical stimulation‐induced isometric contractions. Skeletal muscle isometric contractions induced by neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) exercise can generate damage within activated muscles. This study aimed at comparing the localization and the extent of NMES‐activated muscle areas and induced damage regions using magnetic resonance imaging. Thirteen healthy subjects performed a single bout of NMES‐induced isometric contractions known to induce a decrease in maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVC) and increase in muscle volume and transverse relaxation time (T2). All the parameters were measured before, immediately after (POST), 7 days (D7), 14 days (D14) and 21 days (D21) after the NMES session. Spatial normalization of T2 maps were performed to compare the localization of muscle activation areas and damaged muscle regions from statistical mapping analyses. A significant decrease in MVC was found at POST (−26 ± 9%) and in delayed time at D7 (−20 ± 6%) and D14 (−12 ± 5%). Although muscle activation was statistically detected through T2 increase at POST in superficial parts of the two muscles located beneath the stimulation electrodes (i.e. vastus lateralis and vastus medialis), alterations quantified in a delayed time from increased T2 were mainly located in the deep muscle region of the vastus lateralis (+57 ± 24% of mean T2) and superficial area of the vastus medialis (+24 ± 16% of mean T2) at D7 and were still observed in whole muscle at D21. The discrepancy between activated and damaged areas in the vastus lateralis implies that tissues other than active skeletal muscle fibres were altered during unaccustomed NMES‐induced isomeric contractions. Key points T2 mapping combined to image registration and statistical parametric mapping analysis is a suitable methodology to accurately localize and compare the extent of both activated and damaged muscle areas. Activated muscle areas following electrically‐induced isometric contractions are superficial, but damaged regions are muscle specific and can be related to the muscle morphology and/or the relative spatial position within a muscle group leading to potential intramuscular muscle shear strain. Tissues other than active skeletal muscle fibres can be altered during unaccustomed neuromuscular electrical stimulation‐induced isometric contractions.