Thrombin generation in patients with COVID-19 with and without thromboprophylaxis

Thrombin generation (TG) with and without thrombomodulin (TM) was evaluated in COVID-19 patients with different disease severity and thromboprophylaxis regimen, in order to understand the prothrombotic profile. We enrolled consecutive patients with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 admitted to Medical...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical chemistry and laboratory medicine Vol. 59; no. 7; pp. 1323 - 1330
Main Authors Campello, Elena, Bulato, Cristiana, Spiezia, Luca, Boscolo, Annalisa, Poletto, Francesco, Cola, Marco, Gavasso, Sabrina, Simion, Chiara, Radu, Claudia Maria, Cattelan, Annamaria, Tiberio, Ivo, Vettor, Roberto, Navalesi, Paolo, Simioni, Paolo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Germany De Gruyter 25.06.2021
Walter De Gruyter & Company
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1434-6621
1437-4331
1437-4331
DOI10.1515/cclm-2021-0108

Cover

More Information
Summary:Thrombin generation (TG) with and without thrombomodulin (TM) was evaluated in COVID-19 patients with different disease severity and thromboprophylaxis regimen, in order to understand the prothrombotic profile. We enrolled consecutive patients with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 admitted to Medical Departments (MD) or Intensive Care Units (ICU), and 54 healthy controls. Eighty-nine patients were included (mean age 60.4±16.1 years, 68.5% male); 33.7% admitted to ICU. Twenty-four patients (26.9%) were enrolled before thromboprophylaxis administration; 45 patients (50.6%) received standard and 20 (22.5%) intermediate sub-therapeutic dose thromboprophylaxis. Overall, patients with COVID-19 showed a TG profile comparable to that of healthy subjects (i.e. comparable peak height, endogenous thrombin potential [ETP] with and without TM). The only exception was lag time and time to peak, prolonged in COVID-19 patients vs. controls. MD patients showed a similar TG profile to healthy controls, and ICU patients showed significantly decrease ETP (p=0.030) compared to MD. As for thromboprophylaxis, TG profile was significantly increased in COVID-19 patients without thromboprophylaxis vs. controls and vs. those with thromboprophylaxis. In this latter group, ETP inhibition was significantly decreased (p=0.0003) and positively correlated with anti-Xa activity (r=0.49, p=0.0017). However, patients with thromboprophylaxis had similar TG profile vs. controls. Intermediate dose thromboprophylaxis more effectively inhibited TG in severe COVID-19 patients by increasing ETP inhibition via ETP with TM reduction vs. standard dose. COVID-19 patients showed increased TG at diagnosis. Standard thromboprophylaxis reduced TG to levels of healthy controls. Intermediate sub-therapeutic thromboprophylaxis more effectively inhibited TG by decreasing ETP with TM.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:1434-6621
1437-4331
1437-4331
DOI:10.1515/cclm-2021-0108