Long-Term Results of Angioplasty and Stent Placement for Treatment of Central Venous Obstruction in 126 Hemodialysis Patients: A 10-Year Single-Center Experience
The objective of our study was to report and compare long-term results of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting of central venous obstruction in hemodialysis patients. Hemodialysis patients who underwent successful endovascular treatment of central venous obstruction were retrospectivel...
Saved in:
Published in | American journal of roentgenology (1976) Vol. 193; no. 6; pp. 1672 - 1679 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Reston, VA
Am Roentgen Ray Soc
01.12.2009
American Roentgen Ray Society |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0361-803X 1546-3141 1546-3141 |
DOI | 10.2214/AJR.09.2654 |
Cover
Abstract | The objective of our study was to report and compare long-term results of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting of central venous obstruction in hemodialysis patients.
Hemodialysis patients who underwent successful endovascular treatment of central venous obstruction were retrospectively evaluated. Stenotic lesions greater than 50% or inducing extremity swelling were subject to treatment. The primary treatment was angioplasty, and stent placement was accomplished in angioplasty-resistant obstructions. Angioplasty was the primary treatment of recurrence after stent placement. Additional stenting was reserved for angioplasty-resistant recurrences.
One hundred forty-seven veins in 126 patients (63 males, 63 females) between 15 and 82 years old primarily underwent 101 angioplasties and 46 stent placements. The mean follow-up was 22.1 +/- 16.3 (SD) months. The average number of interventions per vein in the stent group (2.7 +/- 2.4 interventions) was significantly higher than that in the angioplasty group (1.5 +/- 1.0 interventions). Primary patency was significantly higher in the angioplasty group (mean, 24.5 +/- 1.7 months) than that in the stent group (mean, 13.4 +/- 2.0 months). Assisted primary patency of the angioplasty group (mean, 31.4 +/- 2.0 months) and that of the stent group (mean, 31.0 +/- 4.7 months) were equivalent. The overall mean primary patency was 21.1 +/- 1.4 months, and the overall mean assisted primary patency was 31.7 +/- 2.5 months. There were no significant differences in patency rates with regard to patient sex, the type of stent used, the vein or veins treated, or the type of lesions.
Endovascular treatment of central venous obstruction is a safe and effective procedure in hemodialysis patients. Stenting has a significantly lower primary patency rate than angioplasty but adds to the longevity of vein patency in angioplasty-resistant lesions; therefore, stent placement should be considered in angioplasty-resistant lesions. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The objective of our study was to report and compare long-term results of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting of central venous obstruction in hemodialysis patients.OBJECTIVEThe objective of our study was to report and compare long-term results of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting of central venous obstruction in hemodialysis patients.Hemodialysis patients who underwent successful endovascular treatment of central venous obstruction were retrospectively evaluated. Stenotic lesions greater than 50% or inducing extremity swelling were subject to treatment. The primary treatment was angioplasty, and stent placement was accomplished in angioplasty-resistant obstructions. Angioplasty was the primary treatment of recurrence after stent placement. Additional stenting was reserved for angioplasty-resistant recurrences.MATERIALS AND METHODSHemodialysis patients who underwent successful endovascular treatment of central venous obstruction were retrospectively evaluated. Stenotic lesions greater than 50% or inducing extremity swelling were subject to treatment. The primary treatment was angioplasty, and stent placement was accomplished in angioplasty-resistant obstructions. Angioplasty was the primary treatment of recurrence after stent placement. Additional stenting was reserved for angioplasty-resistant recurrences.One hundred forty-seven veins in 126 patients (63 males, 63 females) between 15 and 82 years old primarily underwent 101 angioplasties and 46 stent placements. The mean follow-up was 22.1 +/- 16.3 (SD) months. The average number of interventions per vein in the stent group (2.7 +/- 2.4 interventions) was significantly higher than that in the angioplasty group (1.5 +/- 1.0 interventions). Primary patency was significantly higher in the angioplasty group (mean, 24.5 +/- 1.7 months) than that in the stent group (mean, 13.4 +/- 2.0 months). Assisted primary patency of the angioplasty group (mean, 31.4 +/- 2.0 months) and that of the stent group (mean, 31.0 +/- 4.7 months) were equivalent. The overall mean primary patency was 21.1 +/- 1.4 months, and the overall mean assisted primary patency was 31.7 +/- 2.5 months. There were no significant differences in patency rates with regard to patient sex, the type of stent used, the vein or veins treated, or the type of lesions.RESULTSOne hundred forty-seven veins in 126 patients (63 males, 63 females) between 15 and 82 years old primarily underwent 101 angioplasties and 46 stent placements. The mean follow-up was 22.1 +/- 16.3 (SD) months. The average number of interventions per vein in the stent group (2.7 +/- 2.4 interventions) was significantly higher than that in the angioplasty group (1.5 +/- 1.0 interventions). Primary patency was significantly higher in the angioplasty group (mean, 24.5 +/- 1.7 months) than that in the stent group (mean, 13.4 +/- 2.0 months). Assisted primary patency of the angioplasty group (mean, 31.4 +/- 2.0 months) and that of the stent group (mean, 31.0 +/- 4.7 months) were equivalent. The overall mean primary patency was 21.1 +/- 1.4 months, and the overall mean assisted primary patency was 31.7 +/- 2.5 months. There were no significant differences in patency rates with regard to patient sex, the type of stent used, the vein or veins treated, or the type of lesions.Endovascular treatment of central venous obstruction is a safe and effective procedure in hemodialysis patients. Stenting has a significantly lower primary patency rate than angioplasty but adds to the longevity of vein patency in angioplasty-resistant lesions; therefore, stent placement should be considered in angioplasty-resistant lesions.CONCLUSIONEndovascular treatment of central venous obstruction is a safe and effective procedure in hemodialysis patients. Stenting has a significantly lower primary patency rate than angioplasty but adds to the longevity of vein patency in angioplasty-resistant lesions; therefore, stent placement should be considered in angioplasty-resistant lesions. The objective of our study was to report and compare long-term results of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting of central venous obstruction in hemodialysis patients. Hemodialysis patients who underwent successful endovascular treatment of central venous obstruction were retrospectively evaluated. Stenotic lesions greater than 50% or inducing extremity swelling were subject to treatment. The primary treatment was angioplasty, and stent placement was accomplished in angioplasty-resistant obstructions. Angioplasty was the primary treatment of recurrence after stent placement. Additional stenting was reserved for angioplasty-resistant recurrences. One hundred forty-seven veins in 126 patients (63 males, 63 females) between 15 and 82 years old primarily underwent 101 angioplasties and 46 stent placements. The mean follow-up was 22.1 +/- 16.3 (SD) months. The average number of interventions per vein in the stent group (2.7 +/- 2.4 interventions) was significantly higher than that in the angioplasty group (1.5 +/- 1.0 interventions). Primary patency was significantly higher in the angioplasty group (mean, 24.5 +/- 1.7 months) than that in the stent group (mean, 13.4 +/- 2.0 months). Assisted primary patency of the angioplasty group (mean, 31.4 +/- 2.0 months) and that of the stent group (mean, 31.0 +/- 4.7 months) were equivalent. The overall mean primary patency was 21.1 +/- 1.4 months, and the overall mean assisted primary patency was 31.7 +/- 2.5 months. There were no significant differences in patency rates with regard to patient sex, the type of stent used, the vein or veins treated, or the type of lesions. Endovascular treatment of central venous obstruction is a safe and effective procedure in hemodialysis patients. Stenting has a significantly lower primary patency rate than angioplasty but adds to the longevity of vein patency in angioplasty-resistant lesions; therefore, stent placement should be considered in angioplasty-resistant lesions. |
Author | Karakayali, Feza Boyvat, Fatih Harman, Ali Aytekin, Cuneyt Ozyer, Umut Yildirim, Erkan |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Ozyer, Umut – sequence: 2 fullname: Harman, Ali – sequence: 3 fullname: Yildirim, Erkan – sequence: 4 fullname: Aytekin, Cuneyt – sequence: 5 fullname: Karakayali, Feza – sequence: 6 fullname: Boyvat, Fatih |
BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22204478$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19933663$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNptkUtvEzEUhS1URNPCij3yBrFAE_wazwy7KCoUFKlVGxCsLMdzJzXyeFLbo5Cfwz_FQ0MXiNX14zvXPueeoRM_eEDoJSVzxqh4t_h8MyfNnMlSPEEzWgpZcCroCZoRLmlRE_7tFJ3F-IMQUtVN9Qyd0qbhXEo-Q79Wg98Wawg9voE4uhTx0OGF39ph53RMB6x9i28T-ISvnTbQT6tuCHgdQKc_uyxY5hq0w1_BD2PEV5uYwmiSHTy2HlMm8SX0Q2u1O0Qb8bVONivie7zAlBTfQQd8a_3WQTF1goAvfu4gZMbAc_S00y7Ci2M9R18-XKyXl8Xq6uOn5WJVGEFlKih0AMAaIrtqAx0hvCoJMMEly6bzGW1rURtddXW-MSVvRGVaTiQ3tNKt4OfozUPfXRjuR4hJ9TYacE57yJ5UlRMjoqxZJl8dyXHTQ6t2wfY6HNTfVDPw-gjoaLTrgvbGxkeOMUaEqOrM0QfOhCHGAJ0yNukptRymdYoSNU1Y5Qkr0qhpwlnz9h_N4_P_pY-m7uz2bm8DqNhr5_LHqdrv97ThSioqK8Z_A-1us9U |
CODEN | AAJRDX |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejvs_2024_07_006 crossref_primary_10_5301_ijao_5000324 crossref_primary_10_1053_j_semvascsurg_2017_05_001 crossref_primary_10_1177_11297298221134142 crossref_primary_10_1583_11_3566_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jjcc_2022_06_011 crossref_primary_10_5812_iranjradiol_37994 crossref_primary_10_1177_15266028221136434 crossref_primary_10_3389_fneur_2021_703286 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvir_2013_04_016 crossref_primary_10_1002_cnm_3811 crossref_primary_10_3889_seejca_2023_6062 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00772_014_1381_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nefro_2017_11_004 crossref_primary_10_1177_11297298221122115 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejvs_2018_02_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jccase_2020_08_010 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00270_015_1155_7 crossref_primary_10_1053_j_semvascsurg_2023_04_013 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvir_2023_05_036 crossref_primary_10_1177_11297298231184649 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12872_016_0411_3 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00270_023_03531_w crossref_primary_10_1177_11297298241278007 crossref_primary_10_1177_11297298211007720 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00772_010_0813_y crossref_primary_10_23736_S0394_9508_23_05606_1 crossref_primary_10_5301_jva_5000705 crossref_primary_10_1177_11297298241229108 crossref_primary_10_1177_17085381221092502 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacr_2023_08_016 crossref_primary_10_1177_0268355519898320 crossref_primary_10_3889_seejca_2023_6055 crossref_primary_10_5334_jbsr_1991 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00772_012_1047_y crossref_primary_10_3760_cma_j_issn_0366_6999_20122307 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12928_013_0225_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvsv_2019_08_017 crossref_primary_10_1177_17085381241301536 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvir_2012_05_049 crossref_primary_10_1111_hdi_12889 crossref_primary_10_3400_avd_cr_11_00061 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_diii_2019_03_011 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ihjccr_2018_04_002 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13239_014_0185_7 crossref_primary_10_3389_fcvm_2022_901237 crossref_primary_10_12659_PJR_893358 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvsv_2021_01_001 crossref_primary_10_22575_interventionalradiology_3_1G2 crossref_primary_10_1053_j_ajkd_2012_10_024 crossref_primary_10_4009_jsdt_44_589 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvscit_2019_06_011 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvsv_2016_07_010 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ipej_2016_11_007 crossref_primary_10_7134_phlebol_17_20 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvir_2019_06_010 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ihjccr_2021_10_010 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvsv_2021_02_010 crossref_primary_10_1053_j_ajkd_2019_12_001 crossref_primary_10_1111_sdi_12908 crossref_primary_10_1016_S2013_2514_19_30100_2 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000015208 crossref_primary_10_1055_a_1014_3538 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1542_4758_2011_00570_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvir_2016_07_015 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvir_2011_06_002 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00270_010_0019_4 |
Cites_doi | 10.1148/radiology.217.2.r00nv28600 10.1016/j.jvs.2003.09.034 10.1067/mva.2000.107988 10.1038/ki.1997.468 10.1053/ejvs.2002.1943 10.1038/ki.1997.33 10.1016/S1051-0443(95)71200-3 10.1007/s100169900141 10.1038/ki.1994.156 10.1016/S0967-2109(97)00043-4 10.1007/s00270-002-1960-7 10.1177/153857440403800407 10.1148/radiology.212.1.r99jl21175 10.1007/s00270-007-9083-9 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.12.046 10.1007/s00270-001-0055-1 10.1007/BF02000591 10.1016/S0720-048X(02)00370-4 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2007.00246.x 10.1148/radiology.195.2.7724770 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2015 INIST-CNRS |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2015 INIST-CNRS |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.2214/AJR.09.2654 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1546-3141 |
EndPage | 1679 |
ExternalDocumentID | 19933663 22204478 10_2214_AJR_09_2654 www193_6_1672 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | - 1KJ 23M 2WC 34G 39C 53G 55 5GY 5RE AAWTL ABFLS ABOCM ADACO ADBBV AENEX AFFNX AJYGW ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BAWUL C1A CS3 DIK E3Z EBS EJD F5P GX1 H13 L7B LSO O0- P2P SJN TRR VH1 W2D WH7 WOQ X7M ZA5 --- -DD .55 .GJ 1CY 3O- AAEJM AAYXX AI. AJJEV CITATION J5H MJL TR2 TWZ UDS W8F YJK YQI YQJ ZGI ZVN ZXP IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-1efeee2906f7bef003750e24362789f7b1d848ca7f8375c53947cd3063c17ad43 |
ISSN | 0361-803X 1546-3141 |
IngestDate | Thu Jul 10 23:10:10 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:04:30 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 09:11:58 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 00:40:39 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:03:05 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 10 19:18:18 EST 2020 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 6 |
Keywords | Human Extrarenal dialysis Nuclear medicine Angioplasty Hemodialysis Radiology Instrumentation therapy Instrumental dilatation Long term Obstruction Stent Central vein |
Language | English |
License | CC BY 4.0 |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c416t-1efeee2906f7bef003750e24362789f7b1d848ca7f8375c53947cd3063c17ad43 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
PMID | 19933663 |
PQID | 733604582 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 8 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_733604582 pubmed_primary_19933663 pascalfrancis_primary_22204478 crossref_citationtrail_10_2214_AJR_09_2654 crossref_primary_10_2214_AJR_09_2654 highwire_smallpub1_www193_6_1672 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2009-12-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2009-12-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2009 text: 2009-12-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | Reston, VA |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Reston, VA – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | American journal of roentgenology (1976) |
PublicationTitleAlternate | AJR Am J Roentgenol |
PublicationYear | 2009 |
Publisher | Am Roentgen Ray Soc American Roentgen Ray Society |
Publisher_xml | – name: Am Roentgen Ray Soc – name: American Roentgen Ray Society |
References | REF9 REF7 REF8 REF5 REF6 REF3 REF4 REF11 REF10 REF20 REF15 REF14 REF13 REF1 atypb1 REF19 REF2 REF18 REF17 REF16 |
References_xml | – ident: REF19 doi: 10.1148/radiology.217.2.r00nv28600 – ident: REF8 doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2003.09.034 – ident: REF4 doi: 10.1067/mva.2000.107988 – ident: REF20 doi: 10.1038/ki.1997.468 – ident: REF6 doi: 10.1053/ejvs.2002.1943 – ident: REF7 doi: 10.1038/ki.1997.33 – ident: REF10 doi: 10.1016/S1051-0443(95)71200-3 – ident: REF13 doi: 10.1007/s100169900141 – ident: REF14 doi: 10.1038/ki.1994.156 – ident: atypb1 doi: 10.1016/S0967-2109(97)00043-4 – ident: REF11 doi: 10.1007/s00270-002-1960-7 – ident: REF3 doi: 10.1177/153857440403800407 – ident: REF9 doi: 10.1148/radiology.212.1.r99jl21175 – ident: REF16 doi: 10.1007/s00270-007-9083-9 – ident: REF2 doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.12.046 – ident: REF18 doi: 10.1007/s00270-001-0055-1 – ident: REF1 doi: 10.1007/BF02000591 – ident: REF5 doi: 10.1016/S0720-048X(02)00370-4 – ident: REF15 doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2007.00246.x – ident: REF17 doi: 10.1148/radiology.195.2.7724770 |
SSID | ssj0007897 |
Score | 2.232871 |
Snippet | The objective of our study was to report and compare long-term results of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting of central venous obstruction in... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed pascalfrancis crossref highwire |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 1672 |
SubjectTerms | Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Angioplasty - methods Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical - adverse effects Biological and medical sciences Catheterization, Central Venous - adverse effects Diseases of the cardiovascular system Emergency and intensive care: renal failure. Dialysis management Female Graft Occlusion, Vascular - therapy Humans Intensive care medicine Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Radiography, Interventional Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) Renal Dialysis Stents Survival Analysis Vascular Patency |
Title | Long-Term Results of Angioplasty and Stent Placement for Treatment of Central Venous Obstruction in 126 Hemodialysis Patients: A 10-Year Single-Center Experience |
URI | http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/1672 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19933663 https://www.proquest.com/docview/733604582 |
Volume | 193 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3battAEF3cFEpfSu91L2Ef8lSj1LLWktw3ExxCcFIoNvht0WWVmtpSsOUa52_6Bf3FntGuLi4uvbwIsZIGoXM0mlnNnmHsJAxdD99lZcVhN7aE34utgVKO5XQj0BnZWFiIJF1duxdTcTnrz1qtH42qpU0enkZ3B9eV_A-qGAOutEr2H5CtjGIA-8AXWyCM7V9hPM7SG4t8awdJ82ahyzKC9Gae3SIozrW0EmBM805Re1X8-C_qCqvycqoq1xO8nW9arjULK01ZmgyxQY0vapnRApNCvcQosa71Mmn41x1pAdGUw0JZZEutTN8AVRKqVLkt_w415CpWGa4godhCCopUoxC5NCd_73aaVNPlJq_d5cpM3A4X88pvUX_vlW4OPVp9rVk_3OXKNB0726Rql-_NdAwaVSPGOQsX3wwtlHWqDoyVHl03XTTUbfpn29WNgn79cPR6tiABi8vPpHrbc7Ww9b489_UneT4dj-VkNJvcY_d7HoI1Wl0-q2uKPF938ylvSi8IJeMfGqb3Q6BSlpqqcoM1XsxEd1T5fcpThD6Tx-yRyVn4UBPwCWup9Cl7cGWqMp6x7xUPueEhzxLe4CH2Y17wkFc85OAhr3hIFxgecs1D3uAhn6ccPORNHvKShx95wA0L-R4Lec3C52x6PpqcXVim9YcVIUPILVslSilqRZB4oUqKTs1d1RMIt_CMMWbHvvCjwEt8HIn6zkB4UYz014lsL4iF84IdpVmqXjGOgNsPosANQk8IFwlR0B-oARJ5z3OEUKLN3pdoyMjo4lN7loVEfkzQSUAnuwNJ0LXZSXXyrZaDOXwaL2GV62WwWAA-W263WzBTupJY2GbHe3BX5hCwd4XwfNgo8Zdw-fQfL0gVnr8kBVOqb4CNl5oX9b0g3XDAy9d_vvgNe1i_ZG_ZESBV7xBg5-FxQeqfjnPWTQ |
linkProvider | Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long-term+results+of+angioplasty+and+stent+placement+for+treatment+of+central+venous+obstruction+in+126+hemodialysis+patients%3A+a+10-year+single-center+experience&rft.jtitle=American+journal+of+roentgenology+%281976%29&rft.au=Ozyer%2C+Umut&rft.au=Harman%2C+Ali&rft.au=Yildirim%2C+Erkan&rft.au=Aytekin%2C+Cuneyt&rft.date=2009-12-01&rft.issn=1546-3141&rft.eissn=1546-3141&rft.volume=193&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1672&rft_id=info:doi/10.2214%2FAJR.09.2654&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0361-803X&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0361-803X&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0361-803X&client=summon |