Long-Term Results of Angioplasty and Stent Placement for Treatment of Central Venous Obstruction in 126 Hemodialysis Patients: A 10-Year Single-Center Experience

The objective of our study was to report and compare long-term results of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting of central venous obstruction in hemodialysis patients. Hemodialysis patients who underwent successful endovascular treatment of central venous obstruction were retrospectivel...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of roentgenology (1976) Vol. 193; no. 6; pp. 1672 - 1679
Main Authors Ozyer, Umut, Harman, Ali, Yildirim, Erkan, Aytekin, Cuneyt, Karakayali, Feza, Boyvat, Fatih
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Reston, VA Am Roentgen Ray Soc 01.12.2009
American Roentgen Ray Society
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0361-803X
1546-3141
1546-3141
DOI10.2214/AJR.09.2654

Cover

Abstract The objective of our study was to report and compare long-term results of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting of central venous obstruction in hemodialysis patients. Hemodialysis patients who underwent successful endovascular treatment of central venous obstruction were retrospectively evaluated. Stenotic lesions greater than 50% or inducing extremity swelling were subject to treatment. The primary treatment was angioplasty, and stent placement was accomplished in angioplasty-resistant obstructions. Angioplasty was the primary treatment of recurrence after stent placement. Additional stenting was reserved for angioplasty-resistant recurrences. One hundred forty-seven veins in 126 patients (63 males, 63 females) between 15 and 82 years old primarily underwent 101 angioplasties and 46 stent placements. The mean follow-up was 22.1 +/- 16.3 (SD) months. The average number of interventions per vein in the stent group (2.7 +/- 2.4 interventions) was significantly higher than that in the angioplasty group (1.5 +/- 1.0 interventions). Primary patency was significantly higher in the angioplasty group (mean, 24.5 +/- 1.7 months) than that in the stent group (mean, 13.4 +/- 2.0 months). Assisted primary patency of the angioplasty group (mean, 31.4 +/- 2.0 months) and that of the stent group (mean, 31.0 +/- 4.7 months) were equivalent. The overall mean primary patency was 21.1 +/- 1.4 months, and the overall mean assisted primary patency was 31.7 +/- 2.5 months. There were no significant differences in patency rates with regard to patient sex, the type of stent used, the vein or veins treated, or the type of lesions. Endovascular treatment of central venous obstruction is a safe and effective procedure in hemodialysis patients. Stenting has a significantly lower primary patency rate than angioplasty but adds to the longevity of vein patency in angioplasty-resistant lesions; therefore, stent placement should be considered in angioplasty-resistant lesions.
AbstractList The objective of our study was to report and compare long-term results of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting of central venous obstruction in hemodialysis patients.OBJECTIVEThe objective of our study was to report and compare long-term results of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting of central venous obstruction in hemodialysis patients.Hemodialysis patients who underwent successful endovascular treatment of central venous obstruction were retrospectively evaluated. Stenotic lesions greater than 50% or inducing extremity swelling were subject to treatment. The primary treatment was angioplasty, and stent placement was accomplished in angioplasty-resistant obstructions. Angioplasty was the primary treatment of recurrence after stent placement. Additional stenting was reserved for angioplasty-resistant recurrences.MATERIALS AND METHODSHemodialysis patients who underwent successful endovascular treatment of central venous obstruction were retrospectively evaluated. Stenotic lesions greater than 50% or inducing extremity swelling were subject to treatment. The primary treatment was angioplasty, and stent placement was accomplished in angioplasty-resistant obstructions. Angioplasty was the primary treatment of recurrence after stent placement. Additional stenting was reserved for angioplasty-resistant recurrences.One hundred forty-seven veins in 126 patients (63 males, 63 females) between 15 and 82 years old primarily underwent 101 angioplasties and 46 stent placements. The mean follow-up was 22.1 +/- 16.3 (SD) months. The average number of interventions per vein in the stent group (2.7 +/- 2.4 interventions) was significantly higher than that in the angioplasty group (1.5 +/- 1.0 interventions). Primary patency was significantly higher in the angioplasty group (mean, 24.5 +/- 1.7 months) than that in the stent group (mean, 13.4 +/- 2.0 months). Assisted primary patency of the angioplasty group (mean, 31.4 +/- 2.0 months) and that of the stent group (mean, 31.0 +/- 4.7 months) were equivalent. The overall mean primary patency was 21.1 +/- 1.4 months, and the overall mean assisted primary patency was 31.7 +/- 2.5 months. There were no significant differences in patency rates with regard to patient sex, the type of stent used, the vein or veins treated, or the type of lesions.RESULTSOne hundred forty-seven veins in 126 patients (63 males, 63 females) between 15 and 82 years old primarily underwent 101 angioplasties and 46 stent placements. The mean follow-up was 22.1 +/- 16.3 (SD) months. The average number of interventions per vein in the stent group (2.7 +/- 2.4 interventions) was significantly higher than that in the angioplasty group (1.5 +/- 1.0 interventions). Primary patency was significantly higher in the angioplasty group (mean, 24.5 +/- 1.7 months) than that in the stent group (mean, 13.4 +/- 2.0 months). Assisted primary patency of the angioplasty group (mean, 31.4 +/- 2.0 months) and that of the stent group (mean, 31.0 +/- 4.7 months) were equivalent. The overall mean primary patency was 21.1 +/- 1.4 months, and the overall mean assisted primary patency was 31.7 +/- 2.5 months. There were no significant differences in patency rates with regard to patient sex, the type of stent used, the vein or veins treated, or the type of lesions.Endovascular treatment of central venous obstruction is a safe and effective procedure in hemodialysis patients. Stenting has a significantly lower primary patency rate than angioplasty but adds to the longevity of vein patency in angioplasty-resistant lesions; therefore, stent placement should be considered in angioplasty-resistant lesions.CONCLUSIONEndovascular treatment of central venous obstruction is a safe and effective procedure in hemodialysis patients. Stenting has a significantly lower primary patency rate than angioplasty but adds to the longevity of vein patency in angioplasty-resistant lesions; therefore, stent placement should be considered in angioplasty-resistant lesions.
The objective of our study was to report and compare long-term results of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting of central venous obstruction in hemodialysis patients. Hemodialysis patients who underwent successful endovascular treatment of central venous obstruction were retrospectively evaluated. Stenotic lesions greater than 50% or inducing extremity swelling were subject to treatment. The primary treatment was angioplasty, and stent placement was accomplished in angioplasty-resistant obstructions. Angioplasty was the primary treatment of recurrence after stent placement. Additional stenting was reserved for angioplasty-resistant recurrences. One hundred forty-seven veins in 126 patients (63 males, 63 females) between 15 and 82 years old primarily underwent 101 angioplasties and 46 stent placements. The mean follow-up was 22.1 +/- 16.3 (SD) months. The average number of interventions per vein in the stent group (2.7 +/- 2.4 interventions) was significantly higher than that in the angioplasty group (1.5 +/- 1.0 interventions). Primary patency was significantly higher in the angioplasty group (mean, 24.5 +/- 1.7 months) than that in the stent group (mean, 13.4 +/- 2.0 months). Assisted primary patency of the angioplasty group (mean, 31.4 +/- 2.0 months) and that of the stent group (mean, 31.0 +/- 4.7 months) were equivalent. The overall mean primary patency was 21.1 +/- 1.4 months, and the overall mean assisted primary patency was 31.7 +/- 2.5 months. There were no significant differences in patency rates with regard to patient sex, the type of stent used, the vein or veins treated, or the type of lesions. Endovascular treatment of central venous obstruction is a safe and effective procedure in hemodialysis patients. Stenting has a significantly lower primary patency rate than angioplasty but adds to the longevity of vein patency in angioplasty-resistant lesions; therefore, stent placement should be considered in angioplasty-resistant lesions.
Author Karakayali, Feza
Boyvat, Fatih
Harman, Ali
Aytekin, Cuneyt
Ozyer, Umut
Yildirim, Erkan
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: Ozyer, Umut
– sequence: 2
  fullname: Harman, Ali
– sequence: 3
  fullname: Yildirim, Erkan
– sequence: 4
  fullname: Aytekin, Cuneyt
– sequence: 5
  fullname: Karakayali, Feza
– sequence: 6
  fullname: Boyvat, Fatih
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22204478$$DView record in Pascal Francis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19933663$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNptkUtvEzEUhS1URNPCij3yBrFAE_wazwy7KCoUFKlVGxCsLMdzJzXyeFLbo5Cfwz_FQ0MXiNX14zvXPueeoRM_eEDoJSVzxqh4t_h8MyfNnMlSPEEzWgpZcCroCZoRLmlRE_7tFJ3F-IMQUtVN9Qyd0qbhXEo-Q79Wg98Wawg9voE4uhTx0OGF39ph53RMB6x9i28T-ISvnTbQT6tuCHgdQKc_uyxY5hq0w1_BD2PEV5uYwmiSHTy2HlMm8SX0Q2u1O0Qb8bVONivie7zAlBTfQQd8a_3WQTF1goAvfu4gZMbAc_S00y7Ci2M9R18-XKyXl8Xq6uOn5WJVGEFlKih0AMAaIrtqAx0hvCoJMMEly6bzGW1rURtddXW-MSVvRGVaTiQ3tNKt4OfozUPfXRjuR4hJ9TYacE57yJ5UlRMjoqxZJl8dyXHTQ6t2wfY6HNTfVDPw-gjoaLTrgvbGxkeOMUaEqOrM0QfOhCHGAJ0yNukptRymdYoSNU1Y5Qkr0qhpwlnz9h_N4_P_pY-m7uz2bm8DqNhr5_LHqdrv97ThSioqK8Z_A-1us9U
CODEN AAJRDX
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejvs_2024_07_006
crossref_primary_10_5301_ijao_5000324
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_semvascsurg_2017_05_001
crossref_primary_10_1177_11297298221134142
crossref_primary_10_1583_11_3566_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jjcc_2022_06_011
crossref_primary_10_5812_iranjradiol_37994
crossref_primary_10_1177_15266028221136434
crossref_primary_10_3389_fneur_2021_703286
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvir_2013_04_016
crossref_primary_10_1002_cnm_3811
crossref_primary_10_3889_seejca_2023_6062
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00772_014_1381_3
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nefro_2017_11_004
crossref_primary_10_1177_11297298221122115
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejvs_2018_02_001
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jccase_2020_08_010
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00270_015_1155_7
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_semvascsurg_2023_04_013
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvir_2023_05_036
crossref_primary_10_1177_11297298231184649
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12872_016_0411_3
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00270_023_03531_w
crossref_primary_10_1177_11297298241278007
crossref_primary_10_1177_11297298211007720
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00772_010_0813_y
crossref_primary_10_23736_S0394_9508_23_05606_1
crossref_primary_10_5301_jva_5000705
crossref_primary_10_1177_11297298241229108
crossref_primary_10_1177_17085381221092502
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacr_2023_08_016
crossref_primary_10_1177_0268355519898320
crossref_primary_10_3889_seejca_2023_6055
crossref_primary_10_5334_jbsr_1991
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00772_012_1047_y
crossref_primary_10_3760_cma_j_issn_0366_6999_20122307
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12928_013_0225_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvsv_2019_08_017
crossref_primary_10_1177_17085381241301536
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvir_2012_05_049
crossref_primary_10_1111_hdi_12889
crossref_primary_10_3400_avd_cr_11_00061
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_diii_2019_03_011
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ihjccr_2018_04_002
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13239_014_0185_7
crossref_primary_10_3389_fcvm_2022_901237
crossref_primary_10_12659_PJR_893358
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvsv_2021_01_001
crossref_primary_10_22575_interventionalradiology_3_1G2
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_ajkd_2012_10_024
crossref_primary_10_4009_jsdt_44_589
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvscit_2019_06_011
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvsv_2016_07_010
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ipej_2016_11_007
crossref_primary_10_7134_phlebol_17_20
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvir_2019_06_010
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ihjccr_2021_10_010
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvsv_2021_02_010
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_ajkd_2019_12_001
crossref_primary_10_1111_sdi_12908
crossref_primary_10_1016_S2013_2514_19_30100_2
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000015208
crossref_primary_10_1055_a_1014_3538
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1542_4758_2011_00570_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvir_2016_07_015
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvir_2011_06_002
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00270_010_0019_4
Cites_doi 10.1148/radiology.217.2.r00nv28600
10.1016/j.jvs.2003.09.034
10.1067/mva.2000.107988
10.1038/ki.1997.468
10.1053/ejvs.2002.1943
10.1038/ki.1997.33
10.1016/S1051-0443(95)71200-3
10.1007/s100169900141
10.1038/ki.1994.156
10.1016/S0967-2109(97)00043-4
10.1007/s00270-002-1960-7
10.1177/153857440403800407
10.1148/radiology.212.1.r99jl21175
10.1007/s00270-007-9083-9
10.1016/j.jvs.2006.12.046
10.1007/s00270-001-0055-1
10.1007/BF02000591
10.1016/S0720-048X(02)00370-4
10.1111/j.1525-139X.2007.00246.x
10.1148/radiology.195.2.7724770
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2015 INIST-CNRS
Copyright_xml – notice: 2015 INIST-CNRS
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.2214/AJR.09.2654
DatabaseName CrossRef
Pascal-Francis
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1546-3141
EndPage 1679
ExternalDocumentID 19933663
22204478
10_2214_AJR_09_2654
www193_6_1672
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID -
1KJ
23M
2WC
34G
39C
53G
55
5GY
5RE
AAWTL
ABFLS
ABOCM
ADACO
ADBBV
AENEX
AFFNX
AJYGW
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BAWUL
C1A
CS3
DIK
E3Z
EBS
EJD
F5P
GX1
H13
L7B
LSO
O0-
P2P
SJN
TRR
VH1
W2D
WH7
WOQ
X7M
ZA5
---
-DD
.55
.GJ
1CY
3O-
AAEJM
AAYXX
AI.
AJJEV
CITATION
J5H
MJL
TR2
TWZ
UDS
W8F
YJK
YQI
YQJ
ZGI
ZVN
ZXP
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-1efeee2906f7bef003750e24362789f7b1d848ca7f8375c53947cd3063c17ad43
ISSN 0361-803X
1546-3141
IngestDate Thu Jul 10 23:10:10 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:04:30 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 09:11:58 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 00:40:39 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:03:05 EDT 2025
Tue Nov 10 19:18:18 EST 2020
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Keywords Human
Extrarenal dialysis
Nuclear medicine
Angioplasty
Hemodialysis
Radiology
Instrumentation therapy
Instrumental dilatation
Long term
Obstruction
Stent
Central vein
Language English
License CC BY 4.0
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c416t-1efeee2906f7bef003750e24362789f7b1d848ca7f8375c53947cd3063c17ad43
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 19933663
PQID 733604582
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_733604582
pubmed_primary_19933663
pascalfrancis_primary_22204478
crossref_citationtrail_10_2214_AJR_09_2654
crossref_primary_10_2214_AJR_09_2654
highwire_smallpub1_www193_6_1672
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2009-12-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2009-12-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2009
  text: 2009-12-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace Reston, VA
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Reston, VA
– name: United States
PublicationTitle American journal of roentgenology (1976)
PublicationTitleAlternate AJR Am J Roentgenol
PublicationYear 2009
Publisher Am Roentgen Ray Soc
American Roentgen Ray Society
Publisher_xml – name: Am Roentgen Ray Soc
– name: American Roentgen Ray Society
References REF9
REF7
REF8
REF5
REF6
REF3
REF4
REF11
REF10
REF20
REF15
REF14
REF13
REF1
atypb1
REF19
REF2
REF18
REF17
REF16
References_xml – ident: REF19
  doi: 10.1148/radiology.217.2.r00nv28600
– ident: REF8
  doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2003.09.034
– ident: REF4
  doi: 10.1067/mva.2000.107988
– ident: REF20
  doi: 10.1038/ki.1997.468
– ident: REF6
  doi: 10.1053/ejvs.2002.1943
– ident: REF7
  doi: 10.1038/ki.1997.33
– ident: REF10
  doi: 10.1016/S1051-0443(95)71200-3
– ident: REF13
  doi: 10.1007/s100169900141
– ident: REF14
  doi: 10.1038/ki.1994.156
– ident: atypb1
  doi: 10.1016/S0967-2109(97)00043-4
– ident: REF11
  doi: 10.1007/s00270-002-1960-7
– ident: REF3
  doi: 10.1177/153857440403800407
– ident: REF9
  doi: 10.1148/radiology.212.1.r99jl21175
– ident: REF16
  doi: 10.1007/s00270-007-9083-9
– ident: REF2
  doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.12.046
– ident: REF18
  doi: 10.1007/s00270-001-0055-1
– ident: REF1
  doi: 10.1007/BF02000591
– ident: REF5
  doi: 10.1016/S0720-048X(02)00370-4
– ident: REF15
  doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2007.00246.x
– ident: REF17
  doi: 10.1148/radiology.195.2.7724770
SSID ssj0007897
Score 2.232871
Snippet The objective of our study was to report and compare long-term results of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting of central venous obstruction in...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
pascalfrancis
crossref
highwire
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 1672
SubjectTerms Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Angioplasty - methods
Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical - adverse effects
Biological and medical sciences
Catheterization, Central Venous - adverse effects
Diseases of the cardiovascular system
Emergency and intensive care: renal failure. Dialysis management
Female
Graft Occlusion, Vascular - therapy
Humans
Intensive care medicine
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Radiography, Interventional
Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)
Renal Dialysis
Stents
Survival Analysis
Vascular Patency
Title Long-Term Results of Angioplasty and Stent Placement for Treatment of Central Venous Obstruction in 126 Hemodialysis Patients: A 10-Year Single-Center Experience
URI http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/193/6/1672
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19933663
https://www.proquest.com/docview/733604582
Volume 193
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3battAEF3cFEpfSu91L2Ef8lSj1LLWktw3ExxCcFIoNvht0WWVmtpSsOUa52_6Bf3FntGuLi4uvbwIsZIGoXM0mlnNnmHsJAxdD99lZcVhN7aE34utgVKO5XQj0BnZWFiIJF1duxdTcTnrz1qtH42qpU0enkZ3B9eV_A-qGAOutEr2H5CtjGIA-8AXWyCM7V9hPM7SG4t8awdJ82ahyzKC9Gae3SIozrW0EmBM805Re1X8-C_qCqvycqoq1xO8nW9arjULK01ZmgyxQY0vapnRApNCvcQosa71Mmn41x1pAdGUw0JZZEutTN8AVRKqVLkt_w415CpWGa4godhCCopUoxC5NCd_73aaVNPlJq_d5cpM3A4X88pvUX_vlW4OPVp9rVk_3OXKNB0726Rql-_NdAwaVSPGOQsX3wwtlHWqDoyVHl03XTTUbfpn29WNgn79cPR6tiABi8vPpHrbc7Ww9b489_UneT4dj-VkNJvcY_d7HoI1Wl0-q2uKPF938ylvSi8IJeMfGqb3Q6BSlpqqcoM1XsxEd1T5fcpThD6Tx-yRyVn4UBPwCWup9Cl7cGWqMp6x7xUPueEhzxLe4CH2Y17wkFc85OAhr3hIFxgecs1D3uAhn6ccPORNHvKShx95wA0L-R4Lec3C52x6PpqcXVim9YcVIUPILVslSilqRZB4oUqKTs1d1RMIt_CMMWbHvvCjwEt8HIn6zkB4UYz014lsL4iF84IdpVmqXjGOgNsPosANQk8IFwlR0B-oARJ5z3OEUKLN3pdoyMjo4lN7loVEfkzQSUAnuwNJ0LXZSXXyrZaDOXwaL2GV62WwWAA-W263WzBTupJY2GbHe3BX5hCwd4XwfNgo8Zdw-fQfL0gVnr8kBVOqb4CNl5oX9b0g3XDAy9d_vvgNe1i_ZG_ZESBV7xBg5-FxQeqfjnPWTQ
linkProvider Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long-term+results+of+angioplasty+and+stent+placement+for+treatment+of+central+venous+obstruction+in+126+hemodialysis+patients%3A+a+10-year+single-center+experience&rft.jtitle=American+journal+of+roentgenology+%281976%29&rft.au=Ozyer%2C+Umut&rft.au=Harman%2C+Ali&rft.au=Yildirim%2C+Erkan&rft.au=Aytekin%2C+Cuneyt&rft.date=2009-12-01&rft.issn=1546-3141&rft.eissn=1546-3141&rft.volume=193&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1672&rft_id=info:doi/10.2214%2FAJR.09.2654&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0361-803X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0361-803X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0361-803X&client=summon