Non-Invasive Electrical Brain Stimulation Montages for Modulation of Human Motor Function
Non-invasive electrical brain stimulation (NEBS) is used to modulate brain function and behavior, both for research and clinical purposes. In particular, NEBS can be applied transcranially either as direct current stimulation (tDCS) or alternating current stimulation (tACS). These stimulation types...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of visualized experiments no. 108; p. e53367 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
MyJove Corporation
04.02.2016
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1940-087X 1940-087X |
DOI | 10.3791/53367 |
Cover
Summary: | Non-invasive electrical brain stimulation (NEBS) is used to modulate brain function and behavior, both for research and clinical purposes. In particular, NEBS can be applied transcranially either as direct current stimulation (tDCS) or alternating current stimulation (tACS). These stimulation types exert time-, dose- and in the case of tDCS polarity-specific effects on motor function and skill learning in healthy subjects. Lately, tDCS has been used to augment the therapy of motor disabilities in patients with stroke or movement disorders. This article provides a step-by-step protocol for targeting the primary motor cortex with tDCS and transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS), a specific form of tACS using an electrical current applied randomly within a pre-defined frequency range. The setup of two different stimulation montages is explained. In both montages the emitting electrode (the anode for tDCS) is placed on the primary motor cortex of interest. For unilateral motor cortex stimulation the receiving electrode is placed on the contralateral forehead while for bilateral motor cortex stimulation the receiving electrode is placed on the opposite primary motor cortex. The advantages and disadvantages of each montage for the modulation of cortical excitability and motor function including learning are discussed, as well as safety, tolerability and blinding aspects. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Undefined-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 Correspondence to: Janine Reis at janine.reis@uniklinik-freiburg.de |
ISSN: | 1940-087X 1940-087X |
DOI: | 10.3791/53367 |