Development and validation of an automated algorithm to evaluate the abundance of bubbles in small bowel capsule endoscopy

Abstract Background and study aims  Bubbles can impair visualization of the small bowel (SB) mucosa during capsule endoscopy (CE). We aimed to develop and validate a computed algorithm that would allow evaluation of the abundance of bubbles in SB-CE still frames. Patients and methods  Two sets of 20...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEndoscopy International Open Vol. 6; no. 4; pp. E462 - E469
Main Authors Pietri, Olivia, Rezgui, Gada, Histace, Aymeric, Camus, Marine, Nion-Larmurier, Isabelle, Li, Cynthia, Becq, Aymeric, Abou Ali, Einas, Romain, Olivier, Chaput, Ulriikka, Marteau, Philippe, Florent, Christian, Dray, Xavier
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Stuttgart · New York Georg Thieme Verlag KG 01.04.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2364-3722
2196-9736
2196-9736
DOI10.1055/a-0573-1044

Cover

More Information
Summary:Abstract Background and study aims  Bubbles can impair visualization of the small bowel (SB) mucosa during capsule endoscopy (CE). We aimed to develop and validate a computed algorithm that would allow evaluation of the abundance of bubbles in SB-CE still frames. Patients and methods  Two sets of 200 SB-CE normal still frames were created. Two experienced SB-CE readers analyzed both sets of images twice, in a random order. Each still frame was categorized as presenting with < 10 % or ≥ 10 % of bubbles. Reproducibility (κ), sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), receiver operating characteristic curve, and calculation time were measured for different algorithms (Grey-level of co-occurrence matrix [GLCM], fractal dimension, Hough transform, and speeded-up robust features [SURF]) using the experts’ analysis as reference. Algorithms with highest reproducibility, Se and Sp were then selected for a validation step on the second set of frames. Criteria for validation were κ = 1, Se ≥ 90 %, Sp ≥ 85 %, and a calculation time < 1 second. Results  Both SURF and GLCM algorithms had high operating points (Se and Sp over 90 %) and a perfect reproducibility (κ = 1). The validation step showed the GLCM detector strategy had the best diagnostic performances, with a Se of 95.79 %, a Sp of 95.19 %, and a calculation time of 0.037 seconds per frame. Conclusion  A computed algorithm based on a GLCM detector strategy had high diagnostic performance allowing assessment of the abundance of bubbles in SB-CE still frames. This algorithm could be of interest for clinical use (quality reporting) and for research purposes (objective comparison tool of different preparations).
ISSN:2364-3722
2196-9736
2196-9736
DOI:10.1055/a-0573-1044