Preferences Toward COVID-19 Diagnostic Testing Features: Results From a National Cross-Sectional Survey
Purpose: Describe preferences toward COVID-19 testing features (method, location, hypothetical monetary incentive) and simulate the effect of monetary incentives on willingness to test. Design: Online cross-sectional survey administered in July 2020. Subjects: 1,505 nationally representative U.S. re...
Saved in:
| Published in | American journal of health promotion Vol. 36; no. 1; pp. 185 - 189 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Los Angeles, CA
SAGE Publications
01.01.2022
American Journal of Health Promotion |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 0890-1171 2168-6602 2168-6602 |
| DOI | 10.1177/08901171211034093 |
Cover
| Abstract | Purpose:
Describe preferences toward COVID-19 testing features (method, location, hypothetical monetary incentive) and simulate the effect of monetary incentives on willingness to test.
Design:
Online cross-sectional survey administered in July 2020.
Subjects:
1,505 nationally representative U.S. respondents.
Measures:
Choice of preferred COVID-19 testing options in discrete choice experiment. Options differed by method (nasal-swab, saliva), location (hospital/clinic, drive-through, at-home), and monetary incentive ($0, $10, $20).
Analysis:
Latent class conditional logit model to classify preferences, mixed logit model to simulate incentive effectiveness.
Results:
Preferences were categorized into 4 groups: 34% (n = 517) considered testing comfort (saliva versus nasal swab) most important, 27% (n = 408) were willing to trade comfort for monetary incentives, 19% (n = 287) would only test at convenient locations, 20% (n = 293) avoided testing altogether. Relative to no monetary incentives, incentives of $100 increased the percent of testing avoiders (16%) and convenience seekers (70%) that were willing to test.
Conclusion:
Preferences toward different COVID-19 testing features vary, highlighting the need to match testing features with individuals to monitor the spread of COVID-19. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Describe preferences toward COVID-19 testing features (method, location, hypothetical monetary incentive) and simulate the effect of monetary incentives on willingness to test.
Online cross-sectional survey administered in July 2020.
1,505 nationally representative U.S. respondents.
Choice of preferred COVID-19 testing options in discrete choice experiment. Options differed by method (nasal-swab, saliva), location (hospital/clinic, drive-through, at-home), and monetary incentive ($0, $10, $20).
Latent class conditional logit model to classify preferences, mixed logit model to simulate incentive effectiveness.
Preferences were categorized into 4 groups: 34% (n = 517) considered testing comfort (saliva versus nasal swab) most important, 27% (n = 408) were willing to trade comfort for monetary incentives, 19% (n = 287) would only test at convenient locations, 20% (n = 293) avoided testing altogether. Relative to no monetary incentives, incentives of $100 increased the percent of testing avoiders (16%) and convenience seekers (70%) that were willing to test.
Preferences toward different COVID-19 testing features vary, highlighting the need to match testing features with individuals to monitor the spread of COVID-19. Describe preferences toward COVID-19 testing features (method, location, hypothetical monetary incentive) and simulate the effect of monetary incentives on willingness to test.PURPOSEDescribe preferences toward COVID-19 testing features (method, location, hypothetical monetary incentive) and simulate the effect of monetary incentives on willingness to test.Online cross-sectional survey administered in July 2020.DESIGNOnline cross-sectional survey administered in July 2020.1,505 nationally representative U.S. respondents.SUBJECTS1,505 nationally representative U.S. respondents.Choice of preferred COVID-19 testing options in discrete choice experiment. Options differed by method (nasal-swab, saliva), location (hospital/clinic, drive-through, at-home), and monetary incentive ($0, $10, $20).MEASURESChoice of preferred COVID-19 testing options in discrete choice experiment. Options differed by method (nasal-swab, saliva), location (hospital/clinic, drive-through, at-home), and monetary incentive ($0, $10, $20).Latent class conditional logit model to classify preferences, mixed logit model to simulate incentive effectiveness.ANALYSISLatent class conditional logit model to classify preferences, mixed logit model to simulate incentive effectiveness.Preferences were categorized into 4 groups: 34% (n = 517) considered testing comfort (saliva versus nasal swab) most important, 27% (n = 408) were willing to trade comfort for monetary incentives, 19% (n = 287) would only test at convenient locations, 20% (n = 293) avoided testing altogether. Relative to no monetary incentives, incentives of $100 increased the percent of testing avoiders (16%) and convenience seekers (70%) that were willing to test.RESULTSPreferences were categorized into 4 groups: 34% (n = 517) considered testing comfort (saliva versus nasal swab) most important, 27% (n = 408) were willing to trade comfort for monetary incentives, 19% (n = 287) would only test at convenient locations, 20% (n = 293) avoided testing altogether. Relative to no monetary incentives, incentives of $100 increased the percent of testing avoiders (16%) and convenience seekers (70%) that were willing to test.Preferences toward different COVID-19 testing features vary, highlighting the need to match testing features with individuals to monitor the spread of COVID-19.CONCLUSIONPreferences toward different COVID-19 testing features vary, highlighting the need to match testing features with individuals to monitor the spread of COVID-19. Purpose: Describe preferences toward COVID-19 testing features (method, location, hypothetical monetary incentive) and simulate the effect of monetary incentives on willingness to test. Design: Online cross-sectional survey administered in July 2020. Subjects: 1,505 nationally representative U.S. respondents. Measures: Choice of preferred COVID-19 testing options in discrete choice experiment. Options differed by method (nasal-swab, saliva), location (hospital/clinic, drive-through, at-home), and monetary incentive ($0, $10, $20). Analysis: Latent class conditional logit model to classify preferences, mixed logit model to simulate incentive effectiveness. Results: Preferences were categorized into 4 groups: 34% (n = 517) considered testing comfort (saliva versus nasal swab) most important, 27% (n = 408) were willing to trade comfort for monetary incentives, 19% (n = 287) would only test at convenient locations, 20% (n = 293) avoided testing altogether. Relative to no monetary incentives, incentives of $100 increased the percent of testing avoiders (16%) and convenience seekers (70%) that were willing to test. Conclusion: Preferences toward different COVID-19 testing features vary, highlighting the need to match testing features with individuals to monitor the spread of COVID-19. Purpose: Describe preferences toward COVID-19 testing features (method, location, hypothetical monetary incentive) and simulate the effect of monetary incentives on willingness to test. Design: Online cross-sectional survey administered in July 2020. Subjects: 1,505 nationally representative U.S. respondents. Measures: Choice of preferred COVID-19 testing options in discrete choice experiment. Options differed by method (nasal-swab, saliva), location (hospital/clinic, drive-through, at-home), and monetary incentive ($0, $10, $20). Analysis: Latent class conditional logit model to classify preferences, mixed logit model to simulate incentive effectiveness. Results: Preferences were categorized into 4 groups: 34% (n = 517) considered testing comfort (saliva versus nasal swab) most important, 27% (n = 408) were willing to trade comfort for monetary incentives, 19% (n = 287) would only test at convenient locations, 20% (n = 293) avoided testing altogether. Relative to no monetary incentives, incentives of $100 increased the percent of testing avoiders (16%) and convenience seekers (70%) that were willing to test. Conclusion: Preferences toward different COVID-19 testing features vary, highlighting the need to match testing features with individuals to monitor the spread of COVID-19. |
| Author | Katare, Bhagyashree Marshall, Maria I. Valdivia, Corinne Cuffey, Joel Zhao, Shuoli |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Bhagyashree surname: Katare fullname: Katare, Bhagyashree – sequence: 2 givenname: Shuoli orcidid: 0000-0003-3110-0189 surname: Zhao fullname: Zhao, Shuoli email: szhao@uky.edu – sequence: 3 givenname: Joel surname: Cuffey fullname: Cuffey, Joel – sequence: 4 givenname: Maria I. surname: Marshall fullname: Marshall, Maria I. – sequence: 5 givenname: Corinne surname: Valdivia fullname: Valdivia, Corinne |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34284644$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNp9kU9PGzEQxS0EggD9AFyQpV64LHj8b9e9VYG0SKhUJfS6mjhDtGizBnsXxLfHaYIqUdHTs-XfGz2_2WfbXeiIsSMQpwBleSYqJ_IBJIBQWji1xUYSbFVYK-Q2G63eixWwx_ZTuhdCGhBil-0pLStttR6xxc9IdxSp85T4NDxjnPPx9e_L8wIcP29w0YXUN55PKUu34BPCfoiUvvBflIa2T3wSw5Ij_4F9Ezps-TiGlIob8pv7zRCf6OWQ7dxhm-jTRg_Y7eRiOv5eXF1_uxx_vSq8BugLMg6t9K4ClNaAQ1JurrEy5EulZ1k1afQEUsLMoEFVWrSzUpNUYNGrA3aynvsQw-OQQ9fLJnlqW-woDKmWxqhKCmurjH5-h96HIebImbLCWe2EkZk63lDDbEnz-iE2S4wv9VuFGSjXgF99PLdZ-6b_U0YfsWlrEPVqWfU_y8pOeOd8G_4_z-nak3BBfwN_bHgFJiagAQ |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jocm_2023_100455 crossref_primary_10_2196_37422 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12887_022_03550_5 crossref_primary_10_1590_0037_8682_0167_2022 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2024_1264019 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jocm_2022_100371 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1037/amp0000717 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.02.007 10.3386/w26867 10.1038/s41562-020-00977-7 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104254 10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00093-2 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.05.001 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | The Author(s) 2021 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s) 2021 |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QJ 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1177/08901171211034093 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA) |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Public Health |
| EISSN | 2168-6602 |
| EndPage | 189 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 34284644 10_1177_08901171211034093 10.1177_08901171211034093 |
| Genre | Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S Journal Article |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: National Institute of Food and Agriculture grantid: 227244 funderid: https://doi.org/10.13039/100005825 |
| GroupedDBID | --- -TM -~X 0R~ 23M 2KS 2QV 36B 44B 53G 54M 5GY 5RE 6J9 9M8 AABMB AACMV AADUE AAEWN AAGGD AAGLT AAIKC AAITX AAJPV AAKTJ AAMNW AANEX AANSI AAOVH AAPEO AAQOH AAQXH AAQXI AARDL AARIX AATAA AAWLO AAWTL ABAWP ABCCA ABCJG ABDPE ABDWY ABEIX ABFNE ABFWQ ABFXH ABHKI ABIDT ABIVO ABJNI ABKRH ABLUO ABPGX ABPNF ABQKF ABQPY ABQXT ABRHV ABUJY ABYTW ACARO ACDSZ ACDXX ACFEJ ACFMA ACFUR ACFZE ACGBL ACGFO ACGFS ACHQT ACJER ACLHI ACNCT ACOFE ACONW ACOXC ACROE ACSIQ ACUAV ACUFS ACUIR ACXKE ACXMB ADBBV ADEBD ADEIA ADGDL ADPEE ADRRZ ADTBJ ADTOS ADUKH ADUKL ADVBO AECGH AEDXQ AEGXH AEOBU AEPTA AEQLS AESMA AESZF AEWDL AEWHI AEXNY AFEET AFGYO AFKRG AFMOU AFQAA AFUIA AGDVU AGKLV AGNHF AGNWV AGWFA AHDMH AHWHD AIAGR AIIQI AJEFB AJMMQ AJUZI AJXAJ ALKWR ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMCVQ ARTOV AUTPY AWUYY AYAKG AYPQM BBRGL BDDNI BDZRT BKIIM BMVBW BPACV C45 CBRKF CCGJY CEADM CFDXU CORYS CQQTX DC- DC. DOPDO DV7 DV8 DXH EBD EBO EBS EJD F5P FHBDP GROUPED_SAGE_PREMIER_JOURNAL_COLLECTION H13 HZ~ H~9 J8X K.F KOO O9- OHT OMK OVD P2P PQQKQ Q1R ROL SASJQ SAUOL SCNPE SFC SFH SHG SJN SPV SSDHQ TEORI TH9 UCV UKR UPT WH7 XOL YYP YZZ ZCA ZGI ZONMY ZPLXX ZPPRI ZRKOI ZT4 ~32 AAYXX ACCVC AJGYC AMNSR CITATION ACTQU AIOMO CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF M4V NPM YCJ 7QJ AAPII AJVBE 7X8 AJHME |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-e59a62c981a26519ae39d4a85ec734b85e4e4ace1221b5a5a376a6b74e2316ac3 |
| ISSN | 0890-1171 2168-6602 |
| IngestDate | Thu Sep 04 15:21:57 EDT 2025 Sat Jul 26 02:11:12 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:27:59 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 05:27:55 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:56:03 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 22:48:21 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 1 |
| Keywords | discrete choice experiment monetary incentive disease prevention COVID-19 diagnostic testing health communications |
| Language | English |
| LinkModel | OpenURL |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c411t-e59a62c981a26519ae39d4a85ec734b85e4e4ace1221b5a5a376a6b74e2316ac3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-3110-0189 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/08901171211034093 |
| PMID | 34284644 |
| PQID | 2609649052 |
| PQPubID | 105563 |
| PageCount | 5 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2553820668 proquest_journals_2609649052 pubmed_primary_34284644 crossref_citationtrail_10_1177_08901171211034093 crossref_primary_10_1177_08901171211034093 sage_journals_10_1177_08901171211034093 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 20220100 2022-01-00 20220101 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2022-01-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 1 year: 2022 text: 20220100 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | Los Angeles, CA |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Los Angeles, CA – name: United States – name: Birmingham |
| PublicationTitle | American journal of health promotion |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Am J Health Promot |
| PublicationYear | 2022 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications American Journal of Health Promotion |
| Publisher_xml | – name: SAGE Publications – name: American Journal of Health Promotion |
| References | Gollwitzer, Martel, Brady 2020; 4 Malotte, Hollingshead, Rhodes 1999; 16 de Bruin, Bennett 2020; 50 Matjasko, Cawley, Baker-Goering, Yokum 2016; 50 DeFranza, Lindow, Harrison, Mishra, Mishra 2020 Allcott, Boxell, Conway, Gentzkow, Thaler, Yang 2020; 191 bibr2-08901171211034093 bibr5-08901171211034093 bibr7-08901171211034093 bibr4-08901171211034093 bibr1-08901171211034093 bibr3-08901171211034093 bibr6-08901171211034093 |
| References_xml | – year: 2020 article-title: Religion and reactance to COVID-19 mitigation guidelines publication-title: Am Psychol – volume: 191 start-page: 104254 year: 2020 article-title: Polarization and public health: partisan differences in social distancing during the coronavirus pandemic publication-title: J Public Econ – volume: 50 start-page: 157 issue: 2 year: 2020 end-page: 167 article-title: Relationships between initial COVID-19 risk perceptions and protective health behaviors: a national survey publication-title: Am J Prev Med – volume: 50 start-page: S13 issue: 5 year: 2016 end-page: S19 article-title: Applying behavioral economics to public health policy: illustrative examples and promising directions publication-title: Am J Prev Med – volume: 16 start-page: 182 issue: 3 year: 1999 end-page: 188 article-title: Monetary versus nonmonetary incentives for TB skin test reading among drug users publication-title: Am J Prev Med – volume: 4 start-page: 1186 issue: 11 year: 2020 end-page: 1197 article-title: Partisan differences in physical distancing are linked to health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic publication-title: Na Hum Behav – ident: bibr6-08901171211034093 doi: 10.1037/amp0000717 – ident: bibr4-08901171211034093 doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.02.007 – ident: bibr1-08901171211034093 doi: 10.3386/w26867 – ident: bibr7-08901171211034093 doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-00977-7 – ident: bibr5-08901171211034093 doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104254 – ident: bibr2-08901171211034093 doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00093-2 – ident: bibr3-08901171211034093 doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.05.001 |
| SSID | ssj0025100 |
| Score | 2.366638 |
| Snippet | Purpose:
Describe preferences toward COVID-19 testing features (method, location, hypothetical monetary incentive) and simulate the effect of monetary... Describe preferences toward COVID-19 testing features (method, location, hypothetical monetary incentive) and simulate the effect of monetary incentives on... Purpose: Describe preferences toward COVID-19 testing features (method, location, hypothetical monetary incentive) and simulate the effect of monetary... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref sage |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 185 |
| SubjectTerms | Comfort Coronaviruses COVID-19 COVID-19 diagnostic tests COVID-19 Testing Cross-Sectional Studies Diagnostic tests Discrete choice Health promotion Humans Incentives Medical diagnosis Monetary incentives Polls & surveys Preferences Saliva SARS-CoV-2 |
| Title | Preferences Toward COVID-19 Diagnostic Testing Features: Results From a National Cross-Sectional Survey |
| URI | https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/08901171211034093 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34284644 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2609649052 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2553820668 |
| Volume | 36 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwFLZK94KEEHcKAxkJCYkoU-zcGt5G2TSmrStqigovke047aTSoDZBgh_Fb-Q4dtKmgwl4Sds0iS2fL-fucxB6mQaRZKHwbZq50vYyIm0uwtDmjKeREKDOZcoPeT4MTibe6dSfdjo_t7KWyoIfiB-_3VfyP1SFc0BXtUv2HyjbPBROwHegLxyBwnD8KxqPmiYhayuu8l-twcXH9-9sEgEvq3LoVD3WWFXSWM4spe6VqzoJbl0uijUorvkXi1nD2ic4UFLTHlcJWur3uFx9a4d-mxjPVtEJvZtSJXvprkANG2eFyix7O2ez72wNsGlg9HnOcms8L_PFZRMGKbNMO9BPc7lJVwTLWzV8MRuLLpnx8xpPBaU7nopmeluqttlrNWpNz3C_yLEJ0f1ZDmR1jpKgbweB02Lfun5KC6aaFxPdC8iIdaI7FV2VGFXMWo2mBlPmsAsmr7sRj3VKwPAiOZ6cnSXx0TS-gfZoGBK_i_YOP40-nDcmPnC4yqtXT97E0asSX7tDtDWhK-ZNK7Ww0nbiO-i2WTt8qDF3F3Xk8h66pX28WC_nfTTbwh_W-MM1_vAGf9jgD9f4e4MN-rBCH2a4Rh_eQR_W6HuAJsdH8eDENo07bOERUtjSj1hARdQnjAZgIjDpRqnH-r4Uoetx-PSkx4QklBLuM5-BlGMBDz0J1kbAhPsQdZf5Uj5GWKQ0y2jKWCozLwN20-eZIymIcO5kAeE95NSLmAhT1V41V1kkpC5kv7vuPfS6ueWrLuly3cX7NWUS81qtExqA4e9Fjk976EXzN_BlFWxjS5mXcI0PqoTqldDvoUeaos1oLtj8HhgiPfRKkXjz4D9O48n103iKbm5euH3ULValfAbKcsGfG4T-AplOvNY |
| linkProvider | SAGE Publications |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3db9QwDLfG7QGkCcbnOgYECQkJKVOTpl-8TTdON9iNwW5oiIcqSZM97NZDd-0k-Otx-jVtA4R4qqrGrRs7ie3YvwC8yqPUyFiHlNvAUGGZoUrHMVVS5anWaM5ZF4ecHETjY_H-JDxpsypdLUzbg8ttl1aFHNWTdT-6HVJS4oolY4dM5gfonAS3YDVxC98AVne-Hn6a9O4WalsdYUEC6ijaPc3fvuTqqnTD1LyS5lWvPKN78K3juUk4OduuSmT35zU4x__7qXW42xqkZKfRoPuwYooHsNZE80hTpPQQTg_740iWZFpn2pLhxy97u5SlZLfJ1kN6MnWYHcUpcYZlhY78W_LZLKtZuSSjxfycSNLCcM_I0PUDPaoTwdz9UbW4MD8ewfHo3XQ4pu0RDVQLxkpqwlRGXKcJkzxCY1CaIM2FTEKj40AovAojpDaMc6ZCGUqcz2SkYmHQroykDh7DoJgXZgOIzrm1PJcyN1ZYVKxEWd9wnKyVbyOmPPA7EWW6xS93x2jMMtZBll_vRQ_e9CTfG_COvzXe6uSedQLL0NtLI5H6IffgZf8YR6DbVpGFmVfYJsRFw6HiJx48afSl_1qA3p1Ak9OD1072ly_-Ixub_9zyBdweTyf72f7ewYencIe7uow6NrQFg3JRmWdoLZXqeTssfgEJXwTy |
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3rb9QwDLfgJiEkxPtRGBAkJCSkbE2avvg23XHagI2D3abxqUrSZB84etNdiwR_PU6bFm08hPhUVY1bN3aSnx3bAXheJrmRqY4pt5GhwjJDlU5TqqQqc60Rzlnnh9w_SHaPxJuT-MQ73FwujO_B9ZYLq0KO2snaje6z0m77PcbtMHMJk6mrThZGaKBEl2EDF6owHMHGzqfZh_3B5EKNa70sSEAdhd_X_O1Lzq9Mv8DNc6Fe7eozvQFFz3cXdPJ5q6mR5e8XSjr-_4_dhOsemJKdTpNuwSVT3YZrnVePdMlKd-B0NhxLsibzNuKWjN8f700oy8mki9pDejJ3tTuqU-IAZoMG_Svy0aybRb0m09XyC5HEl-NekLHrC3rYBoS5-8Nm9dV8uwtH09fz8S71RzVQLRirqYlzmXCdZ0zyBEGhNFFeCpnFRqeRUHgVRkhtGOdMxTKWOK_JRKXCIL5MpI7uwahaVuYBEF1ya3kpZWmssKhgmbKh4Thpq9AmTAUQ9mIqtK9j7o7TWBSsL11-sRcDeDmQnHVFPP7WeLOXfdELrUCrL09EHsY8gGfDYxyJbntFVmbZYJsYFw9XHT8L4H6nM8PXIrTyBELPAF44-f988R_ZePjPLZ_CldlkWrzbO3j7CK5yl57Ruog2YVSvGvMYQVOtnviR8QOtswdn |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preferences+Toward+COVID-19+Diagnostic+Testing+Features%3A+Results+From+a+National+Cross-Sectional+Survey&rft.jtitle=American+journal+of+health+promotion&rft.au=Katare+Bhagyashree&rft.au=Zhao+Shuoli&rft.au=Cuffey%2C+Joel&rft.au=Marshall%2C+Maria+I&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.pub=American+Journal+of+Health+Promotion&rft.issn=0890-1171&rft.eissn=2168-6602&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=185&rft.epage=189&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177%2F08901171211034093&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0890-1171&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0890-1171&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0890-1171&client=summon |