Laparoscopic versus open cystgastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocysts: a case-matched comparative study
Background Cystgastrostomy is the commonest method of internal drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (PPs). While large and persistent retrogastric pancreatic pseudocysts are amenable to laparoscopic cystgastrostomy, the potential benefits of this minimally invasive laparoscopic approach over open surg...
Saved in:
| Published in | Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences Vol. 21; no. 11; pp. 818 - 823 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Japan
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.11.2014
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 1868-6974 1868-6982 1868-6982 |
| DOI | 10.1002/jhbp.138 |
Cover
| Abstract | Background
Cystgastrostomy is the commonest method of internal drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (PPs). While large and persistent retrogastric pancreatic pseudocysts are amenable to laparoscopic cystgastrostomy, the potential benefits of this minimally invasive laparoscopic approach over open surgery remain to be demonstrated. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of the laparoscopic and open approaches for cystgastrostomy.
Methods
Patients who underwent laparoscopic cystgastrostomy (LCG) were matched on a 3:1 basis to those who underwent open cystgastrostomy (OCG) according to age, sex distribution, and size of pseudocyst. The outcomes of the two approaches were compared on an intention‐to‐treat basis. Data shown represent medians.
Results
A total of 54 patients underwent cystgastrostomy (35 LCG, 19 OCG) between 1997 and 2011. The final case matched cohort consisted of 40 patients (12 female and 28 male) of which 30 underwent LCG (two converted to open surgery) and 10 underwent OCG. The laparoscopic and open groups were comparable for age (55 vs. 59 years, P = 0.80), sex distribution, and size of pseudocyst (10 vs. 13 cm, P = 0.51). The laparoscopic approach had a significantly shorter operating time (62 vs. 95 min, P = 0.035) and carried a significantly lower risk of postoperative morbidity (10% vs. 60%, P = 0.024) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (6.2 vs. 11 days, P = 0.038). There was one operative death after OCG (10%).
Conclusion
The laparoscopic approach to cystgastrostomy for large and persistent retrogastric pancreatic pseudocysts is associated with a shorter operating time, smoother and more rapid recovery, and a shorter hospital stay compared with open surgery. The laparoscopic approach should be considered the preferable approach where expertise is available. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Cystgastrostomy is the commonest method of internal drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (PPs). While large and persistent retrogastric pancreatic pseudocysts are amenable to laparoscopic cystgastrostomy, the potential benefits of this minimally invasive laparoscopic approach over open surgery remain to be demonstrated. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of the laparoscopic and open approaches for cystgastrostomy.
Patients who underwent laparoscopic cystgastrostomy (LCG) were matched on a 3:1 basis to those who underwent open cystgastrostomy (OCG) according to age, sex distribution, and size of pseudocyst. The outcomes of the two approaches were compared on an intention-to-treat basis. Data shown represent medians.
A total of 54 patients underwent cystgastrostomy (35 LCG, 19 OCG) between 1997 and 2011. The final case matched cohort consisted of 40 patients (12 female and 28 male) of which 30 underwent LCG (two converted to open surgery) and 10 underwent OCG. The laparoscopic and open groups were comparable for age (55 vs. 59 years, P = 0.80), sex distribution, and size of pseudocyst (10 vs. 13 cm, P = 0.51). The laparoscopic approach had a significantly shorter operating time (62 vs. 95 min, P = 0.035) and carried a significantly lower risk of postoperative morbidity (10% vs. 60%, P = 0.024) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (6.2 vs. 11 days, P = 0.038). There was one operative death after OCG (10%).
The laparoscopic approach to cystgastrostomy for large and persistent retrogastric pancreatic pseudocysts is associated with a shorter operating time, smoother and more rapid recovery, and a shorter hospital stay compared with open surgery. The laparoscopic approach should be considered the preferable approach where expertise is available. Background Cystgastrostomy is the commonest method of internal drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (PPs). While large and persistent retrogastric pancreatic pseudocysts are amenable to laparoscopic cystgastrostomy, the potential benefits of this minimally invasive laparoscopic approach over open surgery remain to be demonstrated. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of the laparoscopic and open approaches for cystgastrostomy. Methods Patients who underwent laparoscopic cystgastrostomy (LCG) were matched on a 3:1 basis to those who underwent open cystgastrostomy (OCG) according to age, sex distribution, and size of pseudocyst. The outcomes of the two approaches were compared on an intention-to-treat basis. Data shown represent medians. Results A total of 54 patients underwent cystgastrostomy (35 LCG, 19 OCG) between 1997 and 2011. The final case matched cohort consisted of 40 patients (12 female and 28 male) of which 30 underwent LCG (two converted to open surgery) and 10 underwent OCG. The laparoscopic and open groups were comparable for age (55 vs. 59 years, P = 0.80), sex distribution, and size of pseudocyst (10 vs. 13cm, P = 0.51). The laparoscopic approach had a significantly shorter operating time (62 vs. 95min, P = 0.035) and carried a significantly lower risk of postoperative morbidity (10% vs. 60%, P = 0.024) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (6.2 vs. 11 days, P = 0.038). There was one operative death after OCG (10%). Conclusion The laparoscopic approach to cystgastrostomy for large and persistent retrogastric pancreatic pseudocysts is associated with a shorter operating time, smoother and more rapid recovery, and a shorter hospital stay compared with open surgery. The laparoscopic approach should be considered the preferable approach where expertise is available. Background Cystgastrostomy is the commonest method of internal drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (PPs). While large and persistent retrogastric pancreatic pseudocysts are amenable to laparoscopic cystgastrostomy, the potential benefits of this minimally invasive laparoscopic approach over open surgery remain to be demonstrated. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of the laparoscopic and open approaches for cystgastrostomy. Methods Patients who underwent laparoscopic cystgastrostomy (LCG) were matched on a 3:1 basis to those who underwent open cystgastrostomy (OCG) according to age, sex distribution, and size of pseudocyst. The outcomes of the two approaches were compared on an intention‐to‐treat basis. Data shown represent medians. Results A total of 54 patients underwent cystgastrostomy (35 LCG, 19 OCG) between 1997 and 2011. The final case matched cohort consisted of 40 patients (12 female and 28 male) of which 30 underwent LCG (two converted to open surgery) and 10 underwent OCG. The laparoscopic and open groups were comparable for age (55 vs. 59 years, P = 0.80), sex distribution, and size of pseudocyst (10 vs. 13 cm, P = 0.51). The laparoscopic approach had a significantly shorter operating time (62 vs. 95 min, P = 0.035) and carried a significantly lower risk of postoperative morbidity (10% vs. 60%, P = 0.024) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (6.2 vs. 11 days, P = 0.038). There was one operative death after OCG (10%). Conclusion The laparoscopic approach to cystgastrostomy for large and persistent retrogastric pancreatic pseudocysts is associated with a shorter operating time, smoother and more rapid recovery, and a shorter hospital stay compared with open surgery. The laparoscopic approach should be considered the preferable approach where expertise is available. Cystgastrostomy is the commonest method of internal drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (PPs). While large and persistent retrogastric pancreatic pseudocysts are amenable to laparoscopic cystgastrostomy, the potential benefits of this minimally invasive laparoscopic approach over open surgery remain to be demonstrated. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of the laparoscopic and open approaches for cystgastrostomy.BACKGROUNDCystgastrostomy is the commonest method of internal drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (PPs). While large and persistent retrogastric pancreatic pseudocysts are amenable to laparoscopic cystgastrostomy, the potential benefits of this minimally invasive laparoscopic approach over open surgery remain to be demonstrated. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of the laparoscopic and open approaches for cystgastrostomy.Patients who underwent laparoscopic cystgastrostomy (LCG) were matched on a 3:1 basis to those who underwent open cystgastrostomy (OCG) according to age, sex distribution, and size of pseudocyst. The outcomes of the two approaches were compared on an intention-to-treat basis. Data shown represent medians.METHODSPatients who underwent laparoscopic cystgastrostomy (LCG) were matched on a 3:1 basis to those who underwent open cystgastrostomy (OCG) according to age, sex distribution, and size of pseudocyst. The outcomes of the two approaches were compared on an intention-to-treat basis. Data shown represent medians.A total of 54 patients underwent cystgastrostomy (35 LCG, 19 OCG) between 1997 and 2011. The final case matched cohort consisted of 40 patients (12 female and 28 male) of which 30 underwent LCG (two converted to open surgery) and 10 underwent OCG. The laparoscopic and open groups were comparable for age (55 vs. 59 years, P = 0.80), sex distribution, and size of pseudocyst (10 vs. 13 cm, P = 0.51). The laparoscopic approach had a significantly shorter operating time (62 vs. 95 min, P = 0.035) and carried a significantly lower risk of postoperative morbidity (10% vs. 60%, P = 0.024) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (6.2 vs. 11 days, P = 0.038). There was one operative death after OCG (10%).RESULTSA total of 54 patients underwent cystgastrostomy (35 LCG, 19 OCG) between 1997 and 2011. The final case matched cohort consisted of 40 patients (12 female and 28 male) of which 30 underwent LCG (two converted to open surgery) and 10 underwent OCG. The laparoscopic and open groups were comparable for age (55 vs. 59 years, P = 0.80), sex distribution, and size of pseudocyst (10 vs. 13 cm, P = 0.51). The laparoscopic approach had a significantly shorter operating time (62 vs. 95 min, P = 0.035) and carried a significantly lower risk of postoperative morbidity (10% vs. 60%, P = 0.024) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (6.2 vs. 11 days, P = 0.038). There was one operative death after OCG (10%).The laparoscopic approach to cystgastrostomy for large and persistent retrogastric pancreatic pseudocysts is associated with a shorter operating time, smoother and more rapid recovery, and a shorter hospital stay compared with open surgery. The laparoscopic approach should be considered the preferable approach where expertise is available.CONCLUSIONThe laparoscopic approach to cystgastrostomy for large and persistent retrogastric pancreatic pseudocysts is associated with a shorter operating time, smoother and more rapid recovery, and a shorter hospital stay compared with open surgery. The laparoscopic approach should be considered the preferable approach where expertise is available. |
| Author | Khaled, Yazan S. De Liguori Carino, Nicola Malde, Deep J. Fox, Thomas Ajala-Agbo, Tolulope O'Reilly, Derek A. Sherlock, David J. Laftsidis, Prodromos Packer, Jessica Ammori, Basil J. Deshpande, Rahul |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Yazan S. surname: Khaled fullname: Khaled, Yazan S. organization: Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, North Manchester General Hospital, Delaunays RoadCrumpsall, M8 5RB, Manchester, UK – sequence: 2 givenname: Deep J. surname: Malde fullname: Malde, Deep J. organization: Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, North Manchester General Hospital, Delaunays RoadCrumpsall, M8 5RB, Manchester, UK – sequence: 3 givenname: Jessica surname: Packer fullname: Packer, Jessica organization: Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, North Manchester General Hospital, Delaunays RoadCrumpsall, M8 5RB, Manchester, UK – sequence: 4 givenname: Thomas surname: Fox fullname: Fox, Thomas organization: Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, North Manchester General Hospital, Delaunays RoadCrumpsall, M8 5RB, Manchester, UK – sequence: 5 givenname: Prodromos surname: Laftsidis fullname: Laftsidis, Prodromos organization: Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, North Manchester General Hospital, Delaunays RoadCrumpsall, M8 5RB, Manchester, UK – sequence: 6 givenname: Tolulope surname: Ajala-Agbo fullname: Ajala-Agbo, Tolulope organization: Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, North Manchester General Hospital, Delaunays RoadCrumpsall, M8 5RB, Manchester, UK – sequence: 7 givenname: Nicola surname: De Liguori Carino fullname: De Liguori Carino, Nicola organization: Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, North Manchester General Hospital, Delaunays RoadCrumpsall, M8 5RB, Manchester, UK – sequence: 8 givenname: Rahul surname: Deshpande fullname: Deshpande, Rahul organization: Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, North Manchester General Hospital, Delaunays RoadCrumpsall, M8 5RB, Manchester, UK – sequence: 9 givenname: Derek A. surname: O'Reilly fullname: O'Reilly, Derek A. organization: Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, North Manchester General Hospital, Delaunays RoadCrumpsall, M8 5RB, Manchester, UK – sequence: 10 givenname: David J. surname: Sherlock fullname: Sherlock, David J. organization: Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, North Manchester General Hospital, Delaunays RoadCrumpsall, M8 5RB, Manchester, UK – sequence: 11 givenname: Basil J. surname: Ammori fullname: Ammori, Basil J. email: bammori@btinternet.com organization: Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, North Manchester General Hospital, Delaunays RoadCrumpsall, M8 5RB, Manchester, UK |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25082571$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNp10VtvFCEUAGBiamxtm_gLDIkvvswKw3AZ37Sxt6xWk5r6RljmYGedGUZgqvPvZbPtGo3yAoSPk3N5ivYGPwBCzyhZUELKV-vb1bigTD1CB1QJVYhalXu7s6z20XGMa5IXo6xm5AnaLzlRJZf0AMHSjCb4aP3YWnwHIU4R-xEGbOeYvpqY8mPy_YydD3g0gw1gUqZjhKnxGxRfY4OtiVD0JtlbaLD1fQ6a2R3gmKZmPkKPnekiHN_vh-jz6bvrk_NieXV2cfJmWdiKUlVYyptaSmJrLoVl-VZZAeBM00gllXDESc4NZ1XpcjE1p2A5MeAoW8lSOHaIXm7jjsF_nyAm3bfRQteZAfwUNRVUVFIyUmf64i-69lMYcnaaSiJqQqTiWT2_V9Oqh0aPoe1NmPVDAzNYbIHNfYoBnLZtypX7IQXTdpoSvRmS3gxJ5yH9TnH34SHmP2ixpT_aDub_On15_vbjH76NCX7uvAnftJBMcn3z4Uyfsmv-6f3Nl3z4BSXDsF0 |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_016_3204_1 crossref_primary_10_1089_lap_2017_0006 crossref_primary_10_4240_wjgs_v13_i7_633 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rgmx_2015_05_003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rgmxen_2015_05_001 crossref_primary_10_1155_2021_7586338 crossref_primary_10_14260_jemds_2019_215 crossref_primary_10_1097_AS9_0000000000000024 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_019_06866_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mjafi_2018_02_003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pan_2021_06_006 crossref_primary_10_15406_mojcr_2018_08_00254 crossref_primary_10_31146_1682_8658_ecg_179_7_102_108 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12876_018_0874_z crossref_primary_10_1097_SLE_0000000000001128 crossref_primary_10_36106_ijsr_1908073 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000014255 crossref_primary_10_15279_kpba_2022_27_1_32 crossref_primary_10_4103_jmas_JMAS_201_20 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_giec_2017_11_002 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_022_05346_5 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1007/s00464-008-0196-2 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.05.046 10.1016/S0016-5107(95)70092-7 10.1007/s00464-007-9515-2 10.1159/000072706 10.1007/s11605-009-1048-7 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae 10.1007/978-1-4471-3356-8_26 10.1016/S0016-5107(88)71221-3 10.1002/bjs.1800740920 10.1007/s00464-003-9280-9 10.1097/00000658-198512000-00010 10.1159/000206144 10.1016/S0140-6736(85)92733-3 10.1016/S1052-5157(18)30466-5 10.1097/00129689-200306000-00001 10.1007/s00464-007-9365-y 10.1055/s-2006-925249 10.1007/s00464-003-8801-x |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2014 Japanese Society of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Surgery 2014 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. 2014 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2014 Japanese Society of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Surgery – notice: 2014 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. – notice: 2014 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery |
| DBID | BSCLL AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM K9. 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1002/jhbp.138 |
| DatabaseName | Istex CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| EISSN | 1868-6982 |
| EndPage | 823 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 3787491561 25082571 10_1002_jhbp_138 JHBP138 ark_67375_WNG_F3T5QMWX_F |
| Genre | article Journal Article Comparative Study |
| GroupedDBID | --- -Y2 0R~ 0VY 1OC 2JY 2~H 30V 33P 3SF 4.4 52U 52V 53G 5VS 8-1 8TC 8UJ 95. AAESR AAEVG AAHQN AAIAL AAIPD AAMMB AAMNL AANHP AANLZ AANXM AAONW AARHV AARTL AASGY AAXRX AAYCA AAYZH AAZKR ABCUV ABFSG ABJNI ABJOX ABQSL ABQWH ABXGK ACAHQ ACBWZ ACBXY ACCZN ACGFS ACGOF ACMXC ACOMO ACPOU ACREN ACRPL ACSTC ACXBN ACXQS ACYXJ ADBBV ADBTR ADEOM ADHKG ADIZJ ADKPE ADKYN ADMGS ADNMO ADOZA ADQRH ADRFC ADXAS ADZMN AEFGJ AEGNC AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEUYR AEYWJ AEZWR AFBBN AFBPY AFEXP AFFPM AFGKR AFHIU AFLOW AFWTZ AFWVQ AGHNM AGJBK AGQPQ AGXDD AGYGG AHBTC AHBYD AHKAY AHMBA AHSBF AHWEU AIACR AIDQK AIDYY AITYG AIURR AIXLP ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMKLP AMTXH AMYDB ASPBG ATUGU AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BGNMA BHBCM BMXJE BRXPI BSCLL C45 CSCUP DCZOG DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DU5 EBS EJD EMOBN EN4 F5P FEDTE FUBAC G-S GODZA GQ8 H.X HF~ HGLYW HMJXF HVGLF HZ~ IZIGR JBSCW KBYEO LATKE LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LUTES LYRES M4Y MA- MEWTI MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM MY~ N2Q NF~ NU0 O66 O9- O93 O9I OVD P2W P9S PQQKQ Q.N QB0 QOS R89 ROL RSV S37 S3B SDE SMD SOJ SUPJJ SV3 TEORI TSV TUC VC2 WBKPD WHWMO WIH WIJ WIK WK8 WOHZO WVDHM WXSBR Z45 -5E -5G -BR AAHHS ABTEG ACCFJ ADINQ AEEZP AEQDE AFPWT AIWBW AJBDE GQ6 SZN Z7U Z82 Z87 Z8V ~EX AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM K9. 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c4118-c15d9770c9576c315d4c6eefadd78786f0f755a5342f031951ec50aef13b726f3 |
| ISSN | 1868-6974 1868-6982 |
| IngestDate | Wed Oct 01 14:28:42 EDT 2025 Tue Oct 07 06:34:30 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:07:12 EDT 2025 Wed Oct 01 03:47:27 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:12:34 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:20:54 EST 2025 Sun Sep 21 06:21:38 EDT 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 11 |
| Keywords | Laparoscopic Pseudocyst Cystgastrostomy Pancreatic Pancreatitis |
| Language | English |
| License | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor 2014 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. |
| LinkModel | OpenURL |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4118-c15d9770c9576c315d4c6eefadd78786f0f755a5342f031951ec50aef13b726f3 |
| Notes | ArticleID:JHBP138 istex:C321B1CF49CAAC0D23C212E1CF61D4A859DC95C0 ark:/67375/WNG-F3T5QMWX-F ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
| PMID | 25082571 |
| PQID | 1706900785 |
| PQPubID | 2034613 |
| PageCount | 6 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1616477309 proquest_journals_1706900785 pubmed_primary_25082571 crossref_citationtrail_10_1002_jhbp_138 crossref_primary_10_1002_jhbp_138 wiley_primary_10_1002_jhbp_138_JHBP138 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_F3T5QMWX_F |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2014-11 November 2014 2014-11-00 2014-Nov 20141101 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2014-11-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2014 text: 2014-11 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | Japan |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Japan – name: Tokyo |
| PublicationTitle | Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci |
| PublicationYear | 2014 |
| Publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
| References | Oida T, Mimatsu K, Kawasaki A, Kano H, Kuboi Y, Aramaki O, et al. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic cystogastrostomy performed using a posterior approach with a stapling device. Dig Surg. 2009;26:110-114. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205. Palanivelu C, Senthilkumar K, Madhankumar MV, Rajan PS, Shetty AR, Jani K, et al. Management of pancreatic pseudocyst in the era of laparoscopic surgery-experience from a tertiary centre. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:2262-2267. Bhattacharya D, Ammori BJ. Minimally invasive approaches to the management of pancreatic pseudocysts: review of the literature. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2003;13:141-148. Aljarabah M, Ammori B. Laparoscopic and endoscopic approaches for drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: a systematic review of published series. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:1936-1944. Köhler H, Schafmayer A, Lüdtke F, Lepsien G, Peiper HJ. Surgical treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts. Br J Surg. 1987;74:813-815. Hamza N, Ammori BJ. Laparoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: a methodological approach. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:148-155. Teixeira J, Gibbs K, Vaimakis S, Rezayat C. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y pancreatic cyst-jejunostomy. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:1910-1913. Clavien P-A, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM. Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery. 1992;111:518-526. Varadarajulu S, Bang JY, Sutton BS, Trevino JM, Christein JD, Wilcox CM. Equal efficacy of endoscopic and surgical cystogastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage in a randomized trial. Gastroenterology. 2013;145:583-590. Moran B, Rew D, Johnson C. Pancreatic pseudocyst should be treated by surgical drainage. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1994;76:54. Rosso E, Alexakis N, Ghaneh P, Lombard M, Smart HL, Evans J, et al. Pancreatic pseudocyst in chronic pancreatitis: endoscopic and surgical treatment. Dig Surg. 2003;20:397-406. Kahaleh M, Shami V, Conaway M, Tokar J, Rockoff T, De La Rue S, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst: a prospective comparison with conventional endoscopic drainage. Endoscopy. 2006;38:355-359. Corfield A, Williamson R, McMahon M, Shearer M, Cooper M, Mayer A, et al. Prediction of severity in acute pancreatitis: prospective comparison of three prognostic indices. Lancet. 1985;326:403-407. Huibregtse K, Schneider B, Vrij A, Tytgat G. Endoscopic pancreatic drainage in chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 1988;34:9-15. Hauters P, Weerts J, Navez B, Champault G, Peillon C, Totte E, et al. Laparoscopic treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:1645-1648. Melman L, Azar R, Beddow K, Brunt LM, Halpin VJ, Eagon JC, et al. Primary and overall success rates for clinical outcomes after laparoscopic, endoscopic, and open pancreatic cystgastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocysts. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:267-271. Oida T, Mimatsu K, Kano H, Kawasaki A, Kuboi Y, Fukino N, et al. Laparoscopic cystogastrostomy via the posterior approach for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage. Hepatogastroenterology. 2011;58:1771-1775. Lawson J, Baillie J. Endoscopic therapy for pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1995;5:181. Smits ME, Rauws EA, Tytgat GN, Huibregtse K. The efficacy of endoscopic treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;42:202-207. Warshaw AL, Rattner DW. Timing of surgical drainage for pancreatic pseudocyst. Clinical and chemical criteria. Ann Surg. 1985;202:720-724. 2009; 23 1995; 42 2010; 14 1987; 74 2004; 18 1992; 111 2006; 38 2004; 240 2003; 13 2013; 145 1985; 202 1988; 34 2003; 17 1985; 326 2011; 58 1991 2007; 21 2003; 20 2009; 26 1995; 5 1994; 76 e_1_2_7_6_1 e_1_2_7_5_1 Moran B (e_1_2_7_20_1) 1994; 76 e_1_2_7_4_1 e_1_2_7_3_1 e_1_2_7_9_1 e_1_2_7_8_1 Clavien P‐A (e_1_2_7_15_1) 1992; 111 e_1_2_7_7_1 e_1_2_7_19_1 e_1_2_7_18_1 e_1_2_7_16_1 e_1_2_7_2_1 e_1_2_7_14_1 e_1_2_7_13_1 e_1_2_7_12_1 e_1_2_7_23_1 e_1_2_7_11_1 e_1_2_7_22_1 e_1_2_7_10_1 Oida T (e_1_2_7_17_1) 2011; 58 e_1_2_7_21_1 |
| References_xml | – reference: Clavien P-A, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM. Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery. 1992;111:518-526. – reference: Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205. – reference: Varadarajulu S, Bang JY, Sutton BS, Trevino JM, Christein JD, Wilcox CM. Equal efficacy of endoscopic and surgical cystogastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage in a randomized trial. Gastroenterology. 2013;145:583-590. – reference: Smits ME, Rauws EA, Tytgat GN, Huibregtse K. The efficacy of endoscopic treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;42:202-207. – reference: Oida T, Mimatsu K, Kawasaki A, Kano H, Kuboi Y, Aramaki O, et al. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic cystogastrostomy performed using a posterior approach with a stapling device. Dig Surg. 2009;26:110-114. – reference: Corfield A, Williamson R, McMahon M, Shearer M, Cooper M, Mayer A, et al. Prediction of severity in acute pancreatitis: prospective comparison of three prognostic indices. Lancet. 1985;326:403-407. – reference: Rosso E, Alexakis N, Ghaneh P, Lombard M, Smart HL, Evans J, et al. Pancreatic pseudocyst in chronic pancreatitis: endoscopic and surgical treatment. Dig Surg. 2003;20:397-406. – reference: Bhattacharya D, Ammori BJ. Minimally invasive approaches to the management of pancreatic pseudocysts: review of the literature. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2003;13:141-148. – reference: Lawson J, Baillie J. Endoscopic therapy for pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1995;5:181. – reference: Hauters P, Weerts J, Navez B, Champault G, Peillon C, Totte E, et al. Laparoscopic treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:1645-1648. – reference: Köhler H, Schafmayer A, Lüdtke F, Lepsien G, Peiper HJ. Surgical treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts. Br J Surg. 1987;74:813-815. – reference: Palanivelu C, Senthilkumar K, Madhankumar MV, Rajan PS, Shetty AR, Jani K, et al. Management of pancreatic pseudocyst in the era of laparoscopic surgery-experience from a tertiary centre. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:2262-2267. – reference: Oida T, Mimatsu K, Kano H, Kawasaki A, Kuboi Y, Fukino N, et al. Laparoscopic cystogastrostomy via the posterior approach for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage. Hepatogastroenterology. 2011;58:1771-1775. – reference: Moran B, Rew D, Johnson C. Pancreatic pseudocyst should be treated by surgical drainage. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1994;76:54. – reference: Aljarabah M, Ammori B. Laparoscopic and endoscopic approaches for drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: a systematic review of published series. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:1936-1944. – reference: Warshaw AL, Rattner DW. Timing of surgical drainage for pancreatic pseudocyst. Clinical and chemical criteria. Ann Surg. 1985;202:720-724. – reference: Huibregtse K, Schneider B, Vrij A, Tytgat G. Endoscopic pancreatic drainage in chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 1988;34:9-15. – reference: Teixeira J, Gibbs K, Vaimakis S, Rezayat C. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y pancreatic cyst-jejunostomy. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:1910-1913. – reference: Kahaleh M, Shami V, Conaway M, Tokar J, Rockoff T, De La Rue S, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst: a prospective comparison with conventional endoscopic drainage. Endoscopy. 2006;38:355-359. – reference: Melman L, Azar R, Beddow K, Brunt LM, Halpin VJ, Eagon JC, et al. Primary and overall success rates for clinical outcomes after laparoscopic, endoscopic, and open pancreatic cystgastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocysts. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:267-271. – reference: Hamza N, Ammori BJ. Laparoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: a methodological approach. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:148-155. – volume: 58 start-page: 1771 year: 2011 end-page: 1775 article-title: Laparoscopic cystogastrostomy via the posterior approach for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage publication-title: Hepatogastroenterology – volume: 74 start-page: 813 year: 1987 end-page: 815 article-title: Surgical treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts publication-title: Br J Surg – volume: 26 start-page: 110 year: 2009 end-page: 114 article-title: Long‐term outcome of laparoscopic cystogastrostomy performed using a posterior approach with a stapling device publication-title: Dig Surg – volume: 18 start-page: 1645 year: 2004 end-page: 1648 article-title: Laparoscopic treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts publication-title: Surg Endosc – volume: 23 start-page: 267 year: 2009 end-page: 271 article-title: Primary and overall success rates for clinical outcomes after laparoscopic, endoscopic, and open pancreatic cystgastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocysts publication-title: Surg Endosc – volume: 14 start-page: 148 year: 2010 end-page: 155 article-title: Laparoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: a methodological approach publication-title: J Gastrointest Surg – volume: 21 start-page: 2262 year: 2007 end-page: 2267 article-title: Management of pancreatic pseudocyst in the era of laparoscopic surgery–experience from a tertiary centre publication-title: Surg Endosc – volume: 20 start-page: 397 year: 2003 end-page: 406 article-title: Pancreatic pseudocyst in chronic pancreatitis: endoscopic and surgical treatment publication-title: Dig Surg – volume: 240 start-page: 205 year: 2004 article-title: Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey publication-title: Ann Surg – volume: 76 start-page: 54 year: 1994 article-title: Pancreatic pseudocyst should be treated by surgical drainage publication-title: Ann R Coll Surg Engl – volume: 38 start-page: 355 year: 2006 end-page: 359 article-title: Endoscopic ultrasound drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst: a prospective comparison with conventional endoscopic drainage publication-title: Endoscopy – volume: 42 start-page: 202 year: 1995 end-page: 207 article-title: The efficacy of endoscopic treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc – volume: 326 start-page: 403 year: 1985 end-page: 407 article-title: Prediction of severity in acute pancreatitis: prospective comparison of three prognostic indices publication-title: Lancet – start-page: 299 year: 1991 end-page: 309 – volume: 13 start-page: 141 year: 2003 end-page: 148 article-title: Minimally invasive approaches to the management of pancreatic pseudocysts: review of the literature publication-title: Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech – volume: 21 start-page: 1936 year: 2007 end-page: 1944 article-title: Laparoscopic and endoscopic approaches for drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: a systematic review of published series publication-title: Surg Endosc – volume: 17 start-page: 1910 year: 2003 end-page: 1913 article-title: Laparoscopic Roux‐en‐Y pancreatic cyst‐jejunostomy publication-title: Surg Endosc – volume: 202 start-page: 720 year: 1985 end-page: 724 article-title: Timing of surgical drainage for pancreatic pseudocyst. Clinical and chemical criteria publication-title: Ann Surg – volume: 5 start-page: 181 year: 1995 article-title: Endoscopic therapy for pancreatic pseudocysts publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am – volume: 145 start-page: 583 year: 2013 end-page: 590 article-title: Equal efficacy of endoscopic and surgical cystogastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage in a randomized trial publication-title: Gastroenterology – volume: 34 start-page: 9 year: 1988 end-page: 15 article-title: Endoscopic pancreatic drainage in chronic pancreatitis publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc – volume: 111 start-page: 518 year: 1992 end-page: 526 article-title: Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy publication-title: Surgery – ident: e_1_2_7_5_1 doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0196-2 – ident: e_1_2_7_14_1 doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.05.046 – volume: 58 start-page: 1771 year: 2011 ident: e_1_2_7_17_1 article-title: Laparoscopic cystogastrostomy via the posterior approach for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage publication-title: Hepatogastroenterology – volume: 76 start-page: 54 year: 1994 ident: e_1_2_7_20_1 article-title: Pancreatic pseudocyst should be treated by surgical drainage publication-title: Ann R Coll Surg Engl – ident: e_1_2_7_22_1 doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(95)70092-7 – ident: e_1_2_7_2_1 doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9515-2 – ident: e_1_2_7_23_1 doi: 10.1159/000072706 – ident: e_1_2_7_10_1 doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-1048-7 – ident: e_1_2_7_16_1 doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae – ident: e_1_2_7_19_1 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4471-3356-8_26 – ident: e_1_2_7_7_1 doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(88)71221-3 – ident: e_1_2_7_6_1 doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800740920 – ident: e_1_2_7_8_1 doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9280-9 – ident: e_1_2_7_3_1 doi: 10.1097/00000658-198512000-00010 – ident: e_1_2_7_11_1 doi: 10.1159/000206144 – ident: e_1_2_7_4_1 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(85)92733-3 – volume: 111 start-page: 518 year: 1992 ident: e_1_2_7_15_1 article-title: Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy publication-title: Surgery – ident: e_1_2_7_21_1 doi: 10.1016/S1052-5157(18)30466-5 – ident: e_1_2_7_13_1 doi: 10.1097/00129689-200306000-00001 – ident: e_1_2_7_18_1 doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9365-y – ident: e_1_2_7_9_1 doi: 10.1055/s-2006-925249 – ident: e_1_2_7_12_1 doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8801-x |
| SSID | ssj0000313930 |
| Score | 2.1855466 |
| Snippet | Background
Cystgastrostomy is the commonest method of internal drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (PPs). While large and persistent retrogastric pancreatic... Cystgastrostomy is the commonest method of internal drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (PPs). While large and persistent retrogastric pancreatic pseudocysts... Background Cystgastrostomy is the commonest method of internal drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (PPs). While large and persistent retrogastric pancreatic... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref wiley istex |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 818 |
| SubjectTerms | Adult Aged Clinical outcomes Cystgastrostomy Cysts Drainage - methods Female Follow-Up Studies Gastrostomy - methods Humans Laparoscopic Laparoscopy Laparoscopy - methods Laparotomy - methods Male Middle Aged Pancreatic Pancreatic Pseudocyst - surgery Pancreatitis Pseudocyst Retrospective Studies Surgery Treatment Outcome |
| Title | Laparoscopic versus open cystgastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocysts: a case-matched comparative study |
| URI | https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-F3T5QMWX-F/fulltext.pdf https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fjhbp.138 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25082571 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1706900785 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1616477309 |
| Volume | 21 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVLSH databaseName: SpringerLink Journals customDbUrl: mediaType: online eissn: 1868-6982 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0000313930 issn: 1868-6974 databaseCode: AFBBN dateStart: 19970301 isFulltext: true providerName: Library Specific Holdings |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lj9MwELZKe-GCQLwKCzISgkOVkpdTh9sWKFXFVovU1ZZTlDgOBZamahKJ3V_PTOw8uttKC5c-XCtxM1_mGzsznwl5zaxYJKYpDAjFueEynxuRF7mGFbsi8SWKZuE65Mncm565syVbdjptheAij4biam9dyf9YFdrArlgl-w-WrQ8KDfAZ7AuvYGF4vZWNvwDToRpluvkhBphfUWQD3A5rIC6z_HuY5VjSkf5WOZlw26sIUQw2mSziFDtlqthZAJcZELuCBWOdlq4EwRv12ZsB7AqYLE8NzK4Nt5dG6_iaVpvnRCugoRJK38IrdCjDZiH8Qun-fpRyM5jV7adhle4xwzzdJp9Is2Urr0kvWViurt07sDSpltqaJCZ0w9zjhuer_XuGst3Gd3y3qq6uMGq1PDHXbl2TuipqvsEXSn_25yraDC2HN5xY5QFco8o6gTHc_sKMuBELzuefg4mzYF9PzpfB5A7p2UAvZpf0jifj8bxe7kOJTL_c-ab-b5UUsmm_qwawExz18D7_s2_mszuRKiOhxX1yTyOAHis8PiAduX5IZBuLVGGRIhbpNSxSwCJtsEJbWHxPQ9pGIm0hkZZIfETOJp8WH6aG3sLDEC5MXQ1hsRhmGKbwYV4rHPjmCk_KBFgVmIJ7iZmMGAuZ49oJ1tMxSwpmhjKxnGhke4nzmHTX6Vo-JdTmMrZHCQ8l5iOgqBNEqnYCTsXjo0iGffK2unaB0Pr2uM3KRaCUue0Ar3IAV7lPXtU9N0rTZU-fN-XlrzscsnifHFX2CbRryALUpPIx-mZwrvpncNz4NC5cy7SAPh5K-QHB-n3yRNm1Phm4SA5casEoSkMfHGYwm45P4f3ZbYf7nNxt7sgj0s23hXwBYXUevdSQ_Qu_xtP7 |
| linkProvider | Library Specific Holdings |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Laparoscopic+versus+open+cystgastrostomy+for+pancreatic+pseudocysts%3A+a+case-matched+comparative+study&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+hepato-biliary-pancreatic+sciences&rft.au=Khaled%2C+Yazan+S.&rft.au=Malde%2C+Deep+J.&rft.au=Packer%2C+Jessica&rft.au=Fox%2C+Thomas&rft.date=2014-11-01&rft.pub=Blackwell+Publishing+Ltd&rft.issn=1868-6974&rft.eissn=1868-6982&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=818&rft.epage=823&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fjhbp.138&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=ark_67375_WNG_F3T5QMWX_F |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1868-6974&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1868-6974&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1868-6974&client=summon |