Laparoscopic versus open cystgastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocysts: a case-matched comparative study

Background Cystgastrostomy is the commonest method of internal drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (PPs). While large and persistent retrogastric pancreatic pseudocysts are amenable to laparoscopic cystgastrostomy, the potential benefits of this minimally invasive laparoscopic approach over open surg...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences Vol. 21; no. 11; pp. 818 - 823
Main Authors Khaled, Yazan S., Malde, Deep J., Packer, Jessica, Fox, Thomas, Laftsidis, Prodromos, Ajala-Agbo, Tolulope, De Liguori Carino, Nicola, Deshpande, Rahul, O'Reilly, Derek A., Sherlock, David J., Ammori, Basil J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Japan Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.11.2014
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1868-6974
1868-6982
1868-6982
DOI10.1002/jhbp.138

Cover

Abstract Background Cystgastrostomy is the commonest method of internal drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (PPs). While large and persistent retrogastric pancreatic pseudocysts are amenable to laparoscopic cystgastrostomy, the potential benefits of this minimally invasive laparoscopic approach over open surgery remain to be demonstrated. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of the laparoscopic and open approaches for cystgastrostomy. Methods Patients who underwent laparoscopic cystgastrostomy (LCG) were matched on a 3:1 basis to those who underwent open cystgastrostomy (OCG) according to age, sex distribution, and size of pseudocyst. The outcomes of the two approaches were compared on an intention‐to‐treat basis. Data shown represent medians. Results A total of 54 patients underwent cystgastrostomy (35 LCG, 19 OCG) between 1997 and 2011. The final case matched cohort consisted of 40 patients (12 female and 28 male) of which 30 underwent LCG (two converted to open surgery) and 10 underwent OCG. The laparoscopic and open groups were comparable for age (55 vs. 59 years, P = 0.80), sex distribution, and size of pseudocyst (10 vs. 13 cm, P = 0.51). The laparoscopic approach had a significantly shorter operating time (62 vs. 95 min, P = 0.035) and carried a significantly lower risk of postoperative morbidity (10% vs. 60%, P = 0.024) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (6.2 vs. 11 days, P = 0.038). There was one operative death after OCG (10%). Conclusion The laparoscopic approach to cystgastrostomy for large and persistent retrogastric pancreatic pseudocysts is associated with a shorter operating time, smoother and more rapid recovery, and a shorter hospital stay compared with open surgery. The laparoscopic approach should be considered the preferable approach where expertise is available.
AbstractList Cystgastrostomy is the commonest method of internal drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (PPs). While large and persistent retrogastric pancreatic pseudocysts are amenable to laparoscopic cystgastrostomy, the potential benefits of this minimally invasive laparoscopic approach over open surgery remain to be demonstrated. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of the laparoscopic and open approaches for cystgastrostomy. Patients who underwent laparoscopic cystgastrostomy (LCG) were matched on a 3:1 basis to those who underwent open cystgastrostomy (OCG) according to age, sex distribution, and size of pseudocyst. The outcomes of the two approaches were compared on an intention-to-treat basis. Data shown represent medians. A total of 54 patients underwent cystgastrostomy (35 LCG, 19 OCG) between 1997 and 2011. The final case matched cohort consisted of 40 patients (12 female and 28 male) of which 30 underwent LCG (two converted to open surgery) and 10 underwent OCG. The laparoscopic and open groups were comparable for age (55 vs. 59 years, P = 0.80), sex distribution, and size of pseudocyst (10 vs. 13 cm, P = 0.51). The laparoscopic approach had a significantly shorter operating time (62 vs. 95 min, P = 0.035) and carried a significantly lower risk of postoperative morbidity (10% vs. 60%, P = 0.024) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (6.2 vs. 11 days, P = 0.038). There was one operative death after OCG (10%). The laparoscopic approach to cystgastrostomy for large and persistent retrogastric pancreatic pseudocysts is associated with a shorter operating time, smoother and more rapid recovery, and a shorter hospital stay compared with open surgery. The laparoscopic approach should be considered the preferable approach where expertise is available.
Background Cystgastrostomy is the commonest method of internal drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (PPs). While large and persistent retrogastric pancreatic pseudocysts are amenable to laparoscopic cystgastrostomy, the potential benefits of this minimally invasive laparoscopic approach over open surgery remain to be demonstrated. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of the laparoscopic and open approaches for cystgastrostomy. Methods Patients who underwent laparoscopic cystgastrostomy (LCG) were matched on a 3:1 basis to those who underwent open cystgastrostomy (OCG) according to age, sex distribution, and size of pseudocyst. The outcomes of the two approaches were compared on an intention-to-treat basis. Data shown represent medians. Results A total of 54 patients underwent cystgastrostomy (35 LCG, 19 OCG) between 1997 and 2011. The final case matched cohort consisted of 40 patients (12 female and 28 male) of which 30 underwent LCG (two converted to open surgery) and 10 underwent OCG. The laparoscopic and open groups were comparable for age (55 vs. 59 years, P = 0.80), sex distribution, and size of pseudocyst (10 vs. 13cm, P = 0.51). The laparoscopic approach had a significantly shorter operating time (62 vs. 95min, P = 0.035) and carried a significantly lower risk of postoperative morbidity (10% vs. 60%, P = 0.024) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (6.2 vs. 11 days, P = 0.038). There was one operative death after OCG (10%). Conclusion The laparoscopic approach to cystgastrostomy for large and persistent retrogastric pancreatic pseudocysts is associated with a shorter operating time, smoother and more rapid recovery, and a shorter hospital stay compared with open surgery. The laparoscopic approach should be considered the preferable approach where expertise is available.
Background Cystgastrostomy is the commonest method of internal drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (PPs). While large and persistent retrogastric pancreatic pseudocysts are amenable to laparoscopic cystgastrostomy, the potential benefits of this minimally invasive laparoscopic approach over open surgery remain to be demonstrated. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of the laparoscopic and open approaches for cystgastrostomy. Methods Patients who underwent laparoscopic cystgastrostomy (LCG) were matched on a 3:1 basis to those who underwent open cystgastrostomy (OCG) according to age, sex distribution, and size of pseudocyst. The outcomes of the two approaches were compared on an intention‐to‐treat basis. Data shown represent medians. Results A total of 54 patients underwent cystgastrostomy (35 LCG, 19 OCG) between 1997 and 2011. The final case matched cohort consisted of 40 patients (12 female and 28 male) of which 30 underwent LCG (two converted to open surgery) and 10 underwent OCG. The laparoscopic and open groups were comparable for age (55 vs. 59 years, P = 0.80), sex distribution, and size of pseudocyst (10 vs. 13 cm, P = 0.51). The laparoscopic approach had a significantly shorter operating time (62 vs. 95 min, P = 0.035) and carried a significantly lower risk of postoperative morbidity (10% vs. 60%, P = 0.024) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (6.2 vs. 11 days, P = 0.038). There was one operative death after OCG (10%). Conclusion The laparoscopic approach to cystgastrostomy for large and persistent retrogastric pancreatic pseudocysts is associated with a shorter operating time, smoother and more rapid recovery, and a shorter hospital stay compared with open surgery. The laparoscopic approach should be considered the preferable approach where expertise is available.
Cystgastrostomy is the commonest method of internal drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (PPs). While large and persistent retrogastric pancreatic pseudocysts are amenable to laparoscopic cystgastrostomy, the potential benefits of this minimally invasive laparoscopic approach over open surgery remain to be demonstrated. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of the laparoscopic and open approaches for cystgastrostomy.BACKGROUNDCystgastrostomy is the commonest method of internal drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (PPs). While large and persistent retrogastric pancreatic pseudocysts are amenable to laparoscopic cystgastrostomy, the potential benefits of this minimally invasive laparoscopic approach over open surgery remain to be demonstrated. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of the laparoscopic and open approaches for cystgastrostomy.Patients who underwent laparoscopic cystgastrostomy (LCG) were matched on a 3:1 basis to those who underwent open cystgastrostomy (OCG) according to age, sex distribution, and size of pseudocyst. The outcomes of the two approaches were compared on an intention-to-treat basis. Data shown represent medians.METHODSPatients who underwent laparoscopic cystgastrostomy (LCG) were matched on a 3:1 basis to those who underwent open cystgastrostomy (OCG) according to age, sex distribution, and size of pseudocyst. The outcomes of the two approaches were compared on an intention-to-treat basis. Data shown represent medians.A total of 54 patients underwent cystgastrostomy (35 LCG, 19 OCG) between 1997 and 2011. The final case matched cohort consisted of 40 patients (12 female and 28 male) of which 30 underwent LCG (two converted to open surgery) and 10 underwent OCG. The laparoscopic and open groups were comparable for age (55 vs. 59 years, P = 0.80), sex distribution, and size of pseudocyst (10 vs. 13 cm, P = 0.51). The laparoscopic approach had a significantly shorter operating time (62 vs. 95 min, P = 0.035) and carried a significantly lower risk of postoperative morbidity (10% vs. 60%, P = 0.024) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (6.2 vs. 11 days, P = 0.038). There was one operative death after OCG (10%).RESULTSA total of 54 patients underwent cystgastrostomy (35 LCG, 19 OCG) between 1997 and 2011. The final case matched cohort consisted of 40 patients (12 female and 28 male) of which 30 underwent LCG (two converted to open surgery) and 10 underwent OCG. The laparoscopic and open groups were comparable for age (55 vs. 59 years, P = 0.80), sex distribution, and size of pseudocyst (10 vs. 13 cm, P = 0.51). The laparoscopic approach had a significantly shorter operating time (62 vs. 95 min, P = 0.035) and carried a significantly lower risk of postoperative morbidity (10% vs. 60%, P = 0.024) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (6.2 vs. 11 days, P = 0.038). There was one operative death after OCG (10%).The laparoscopic approach to cystgastrostomy for large and persistent retrogastric pancreatic pseudocysts is associated with a shorter operating time, smoother and more rapid recovery, and a shorter hospital stay compared with open surgery. The laparoscopic approach should be considered the preferable approach where expertise is available.CONCLUSIONThe laparoscopic approach to cystgastrostomy for large and persistent retrogastric pancreatic pseudocysts is associated with a shorter operating time, smoother and more rapid recovery, and a shorter hospital stay compared with open surgery. The laparoscopic approach should be considered the preferable approach where expertise is available.
Author Khaled, Yazan S.
De Liguori Carino, Nicola
Malde, Deep J.
Fox, Thomas
Ajala-Agbo, Tolulope
O'Reilly, Derek A.
Sherlock, David J.
Laftsidis, Prodromos
Packer, Jessica
Ammori, Basil J.
Deshpande, Rahul
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Yazan S.
  surname: Khaled
  fullname: Khaled, Yazan S.
  organization: Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, North Manchester General Hospital, Delaunays RoadCrumpsall, M8 5RB, Manchester, UK
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Deep J.
  surname: Malde
  fullname: Malde, Deep J.
  organization: Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, North Manchester General Hospital, Delaunays RoadCrumpsall, M8 5RB, Manchester, UK
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Jessica
  surname: Packer
  fullname: Packer, Jessica
  organization: Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, North Manchester General Hospital, Delaunays RoadCrumpsall, M8 5RB, Manchester, UK
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Thomas
  surname: Fox
  fullname: Fox, Thomas
  organization: Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, North Manchester General Hospital, Delaunays RoadCrumpsall, M8 5RB, Manchester, UK
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Prodromos
  surname: Laftsidis
  fullname: Laftsidis, Prodromos
  organization: Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, North Manchester General Hospital, Delaunays RoadCrumpsall, M8 5RB, Manchester, UK
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Tolulope
  surname: Ajala-Agbo
  fullname: Ajala-Agbo, Tolulope
  organization: Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, North Manchester General Hospital, Delaunays RoadCrumpsall, M8 5RB, Manchester, UK
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Nicola
  surname: De Liguori Carino
  fullname: De Liguori Carino, Nicola
  organization: Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, North Manchester General Hospital, Delaunays RoadCrumpsall, M8 5RB, Manchester, UK
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Rahul
  surname: Deshpande
  fullname: Deshpande, Rahul
  organization: Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, North Manchester General Hospital, Delaunays RoadCrumpsall, M8 5RB, Manchester, UK
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Derek A.
  surname: O'Reilly
  fullname: O'Reilly, Derek A.
  organization: Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, North Manchester General Hospital, Delaunays RoadCrumpsall, M8 5RB, Manchester, UK
– sequence: 10
  givenname: David J.
  surname: Sherlock
  fullname: Sherlock, David J.
  organization: Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, North Manchester General Hospital, Delaunays RoadCrumpsall, M8 5RB, Manchester, UK
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Basil J.
  surname: Ammori
  fullname: Ammori, Basil J.
  email: bammori@btinternet.com
  organization: Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, North Manchester General Hospital, Delaunays RoadCrumpsall, M8 5RB, Manchester, UK
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25082571$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp10VtvFCEUAGBiamxtm_gLDIkvvswKw3AZ37Sxt6xWk5r6RljmYGedGUZgqvPvZbPtGo3yAoSPk3N5ivYGPwBCzyhZUELKV-vb1bigTD1CB1QJVYhalXu7s6z20XGMa5IXo6xm5AnaLzlRJZf0AMHSjCb4aP3YWnwHIU4R-xEGbOeYvpqY8mPy_YydD3g0gw1gUqZjhKnxGxRfY4OtiVD0JtlbaLD1fQ6a2R3gmKZmPkKPnekiHN_vh-jz6bvrk_NieXV2cfJmWdiKUlVYyptaSmJrLoVl-VZZAeBM00gllXDESc4NZ1XpcjE1p2A5MeAoW8lSOHaIXm7jjsF_nyAm3bfRQteZAfwUNRVUVFIyUmf64i-69lMYcnaaSiJqQqTiWT2_V9Oqh0aPoe1NmPVDAzNYbIHNfYoBnLZtypX7IQXTdpoSvRmS3gxJ5yH9TnH34SHmP2ixpT_aDub_On15_vbjH76NCX7uvAnftJBMcn3z4Uyfsmv-6f3Nl3z4BSXDsF0
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_016_3204_1
crossref_primary_10_1089_lap_2017_0006
crossref_primary_10_4240_wjgs_v13_i7_633
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rgmx_2015_05_003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rgmxen_2015_05_001
crossref_primary_10_1155_2021_7586338
crossref_primary_10_14260_jemds_2019_215
crossref_primary_10_1097_AS9_0000000000000024
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_019_06866_z
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mjafi_2018_02_003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pan_2021_06_006
crossref_primary_10_15406_mojcr_2018_08_00254
crossref_primary_10_31146_1682_8658_ecg_179_7_102_108
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12876_018_0874_z
crossref_primary_10_1097_SLE_0000000000001128
crossref_primary_10_36106_ijsr_1908073
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000014255
crossref_primary_10_15279_kpba_2022_27_1_32
crossref_primary_10_4103_jmas_JMAS_201_20
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_giec_2017_11_002
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_022_05346_5
Cites_doi 10.1007/s00464-008-0196-2
10.1053/j.gastro.2013.05.046
10.1016/S0016-5107(95)70092-7
10.1007/s00464-007-9515-2
10.1159/000072706
10.1007/s11605-009-1048-7
10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
10.1007/978-1-4471-3356-8_26
10.1016/S0016-5107(88)71221-3
10.1002/bjs.1800740920
10.1007/s00464-003-9280-9
10.1097/00000658-198512000-00010
10.1159/000206144
10.1016/S0140-6736(85)92733-3
10.1016/S1052-5157(18)30466-5
10.1097/00129689-200306000-00001
10.1007/s00464-007-9365-y
10.1055/s-2006-925249
10.1007/s00464-003-8801-x
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2014 Japanese Society of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Surgery
2014 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.
2014 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
Copyright_xml – notice: 2014 Japanese Society of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Surgery
– notice: 2014 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.
– notice: 2014 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
DBID BSCLL
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
K9.
7X8
DOI 10.1002/jhbp.138
DatabaseName Istex
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)

MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 1868-6982
EndPage 823
ExternalDocumentID 3787491561
25082571
10_1002_jhbp_138
JHBP138
ark_67375_WNG_F3T5QMWX_F
Genre article
Journal Article
Comparative Study
GroupedDBID ---
-Y2
0R~
0VY
1OC
2JY
2~H
30V
33P
3SF
4.4
52U
52V
53G
5VS
8-1
8TC
8UJ
95.
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHQN
AAIAL
AAIPD
AAMMB
AAMNL
AANHP
AANLZ
AANXM
AAONW
AARHV
AARTL
AASGY
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAYZH
AAZKR
ABCUV
ABFSG
ABJNI
ABJOX
ABQSL
ABQWH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACBXY
ACCZN
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACMXC
ACOMO
ACPOU
ACREN
ACRPL
ACSTC
ACXBN
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADHKG
ADIZJ
ADKPE
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADNMO
ADOZA
ADQRH
ADRFC
ADXAS
ADZMN
AEFGJ
AEGNC
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEUYR
AEYWJ
AEZWR
AFBBN
AFBPY
AFEXP
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFHIU
AFLOW
AFWTZ
AFWVQ
AGHNM
AGJBK
AGQPQ
AGXDD
AGYGG
AHBTC
AHBYD
AHKAY
AHMBA
AHSBF
AHWEU
AIACR
AIDQK
AIDYY
AITYG
AIURR
AIXLP
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMKLP
AMTXH
AMYDB
ASPBG
ATUGU
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BGNMA
BHBCM
BMXJE
BRXPI
BSCLL
C45
CSCUP
DCZOG
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DU5
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
EN4
F5P
FEDTE
FUBAC
G-S
GODZA
GQ8
H.X
HF~
HGLYW
HMJXF
HVGLF
HZ~
IZIGR
JBSCW
KBYEO
LATKE
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LUTES
LYRES
M4Y
MA-
MEWTI
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
MY~
N2Q
NF~
NU0
O66
O9-
O93
O9I
OVD
P2W
P9S
PQQKQ
Q.N
QB0
QOS
R89
ROL
RSV
S37
S3B
SDE
SMD
SOJ
SUPJJ
SV3
TEORI
TSV
TUC
VC2
WBKPD
WHWMO
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WK8
WOHZO
WVDHM
WXSBR
Z45
-5E
-5G
-BR
AAHHS
ABTEG
ACCFJ
ADINQ
AEEZP
AEQDE
AFPWT
AIWBW
AJBDE
GQ6
SZN
Z7U
Z82
Z87
Z8V
~EX
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
K9.
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c4118-c15d9770c9576c315d4c6eefadd78786f0f755a5342f031951ec50aef13b726f3
ISSN 1868-6974
1868-6982
IngestDate Wed Oct 01 14:28:42 EDT 2025
Tue Oct 07 06:34:30 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:07:12 EDT 2025
Wed Oct 01 03:47:27 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:12:34 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:20:54 EST 2025
Sun Sep 21 06:21:38 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 11
Keywords Laparoscopic
Pseudocyst
Cystgastrostomy
Pancreatic
Pancreatitis
Language English
License http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
2014 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4118-c15d9770c9576c315d4c6eefadd78786f0f755a5342f031951ec50aef13b726f3
Notes ArticleID:JHBP138
istex:C321B1CF49CAAC0D23C212E1CF61D4A859DC95C0
ark:/67375/WNG-F3T5QMWX-F
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
PMID 25082571
PQID 1706900785
PQPubID 2034613
PageCount 6
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1616477309
proquest_journals_1706900785
pubmed_primary_25082571
crossref_citationtrail_10_1002_jhbp_138
crossref_primary_10_1002_jhbp_138
wiley_primary_10_1002_jhbp_138_JHBP138
istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_F3T5QMWX_F
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2014-11
November 2014
2014-11-00
2014-Nov
20141101
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2014-11-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2014
  text: 2014-11
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Japan
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Japan
– name: Tokyo
PublicationTitle Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences
PublicationTitleAlternate J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci
PublicationYear 2014
Publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
– name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
References Oida T, Mimatsu K, Kawasaki A, Kano H, Kuboi Y, Aramaki O, et al. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic cystogastrostomy performed using a posterior approach with a stapling device. Dig Surg. 2009;26:110-114.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205.
Palanivelu C, Senthilkumar K, Madhankumar MV, Rajan PS, Shetty AR, Jani K, et al. Management of pancreatic pseudocyst in the era of laparoscopic surgery-experience from a tertiary centre. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:2262-2267.
Bhattacharya D, Ammori BJ. Minimally invasive approaches to the management of pancreatic pseudocysts: review of the literature. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2003;13:141-148.
Aljarabah M, Ammori B. Laparoscopic and endoscopic approaches for drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: a systematic review of published series. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:1936-1944.
Köhler H, Schafmayer A, Lüdtke F, Lepsien G, Peiper HJ. Surgical treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts. Br J Surg. 1987;74:813-815.
Hamza N, Ammori BJ. Laparoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: a methodological approach. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:148-155.
Teixeira J, Gibbs K, Vaimakis S, Rezayat C. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y pancreatic cyst-jejunostomy. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:1910-1913.
Clavien P-A, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM. Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery. 1992;111:518-526.
Varadarajulu S, Bang JY, Sutton BS, Trevino JM, Christein JD, Wilcox CM. Equal efficacy of endoscopic and surgical cystogastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage in a randomized trial. Gastroenterology. 2013;145:583-590.
Moran B, Rew D, Johnson C. Pancreatic pseudocyst should be treated by surgical drainage. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1994;76:54.
Rosso E, Alexakis N, Ghaneh P, Lombard M, Smart HL, Evans J, et al. Pancreatic pseudocyst in chronic pancreatitis: endoscopic and surgical treatment. Dig Surg. 2003;20:397-406.
Kahaleh M, Shami V, Conaway M, Tokar J, Rockoff T, De La Rue S, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst: a prospective comparison with conventional endoscopic drainage. Endoscopy. 2006;38:355-359.
Corfield A, Williamson R, McMahon M, Shearer M, Cooper M, Mayer A, et al. Prediction of severity in acute pancreatitis: prospective comparison of three prognostic indices. Lancet. 1985;326:403-407.
Huibregtse K, Schneider B, Vrij A, Tytgat G. Endoscopic pancreatic drainage in chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 1988;34:9-15.
Hauters P, Weerts J, Navez B, Champault G, Peillon C, Totte E, et al. Laparoscopic treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:1645-1648.
Melman L, Azar R, Beddow K, Brunt LM, Halpin VJ, Eagon JC, et al. Primary and overall success rates for clinical outcomes after laparoscopic, endoscopic, and open pancreatic cystgastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocysts. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:267-271.
Oida T, Mimatsu K, Kano H, Kawasaki A, Kuboi Y, Fukino N, et al. Laparoscopic cystogastrostomy via the posterior approach for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage. Hepatogastroenterology. 2011;58:1771-1775.
Lawson J, Baillie J. Endoscopic therapy for pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1995;5:181.
Smits ME, Rauws EA, Tytgat GN, Huibregtse K. The efficacy of endoscopic treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;42:202-207.
Warshaw AL, Rattner DW. Timing of surgical drainage for pancreatic pseudocyst. Clinical and chemical criteria. Ann Surg. 1985;202:720-724.
2009; 23
1995; 42
2010; 14
1987; 74
2004; 18
1992; 111
2006; 38
2004; 240
2003; 13
2013; 145
1985; 202
1988; 34
2003; 17
1985; 326
2011; 58
1991
2007; 21
2003; 20
2009; 26
1995; 5
1994; 76
e_1_2_7_6_1
e_1_2_7_5_1
Moran B (e_1_2_7_20_1) 1994; 76
e_1_2_7_4_1
e_1_2_7_3_1
e_1_2_7_9_1
e_1_2_7_8_1
Clavien P‐A (e_1_2_7_15_1) 1992; 111
e_1_2_7_7_1
e_1_2_7_19_1
e_1_2_7_18_1
e_1_2_7_16_1
e_1_2_7_2_1
e_1_2_7_14_1
e_1_2_7_13_1
e_1_2_7_12_1
e_1_2_7_23_1
e_1_2_7_11_1
e_1_2_7_22_1
e_1_2_7_10_1
Oida T (e_1_2_7_17_1) 2011; 58
e_1_2_7_21_1
References_xml – reference: Clavien P-A, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM. Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery. 1992;111:518-526.
– reference: Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205.
– reference: Varadarajulu S, Bang JY, Sutton BS, Trevino JM, Christein JD, Wilcox CM. Equal efficacy of endoscopic and surgical cystogastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage in a randomized trial. Gastroenterology. 2013;145:583-590.
– reference: Smits ME, Rauws EA, Tytgat GN, Huibregtse K. The efficacy of endoscopic treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;42:202-207.
– reference: Oida T, Mimatsu K, Kawasaki A, Kano H, Kuboi Y, Aramaki O, et al. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic cystogastrostomy performed using a posterior approach with a stapling device. Dig Surg. 2009;26:110-114.
– reference: Corfield A, Williamson R, McMahon M, Shearer M, Cooper M, Mayer A, et al. Prediction of severity in acute pancreatitis: prospective comparison of three prognostic indices. Lancet. 1985;326:403-407.
– reference: Rosso E, Alexakis N, Ghaneh P, Lombard M, Smart HL, Evans J, et al. Pancreatic pseudocyst in chronic pancreatitis: endoscopic and surgical treatment. Dig Surg. 2003;20:397-406.
– reference: Bhattacharya D, Ammori BJ. Minimally invasive approaches to the management of pancreatic pseudocysts: review of the literature. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2003;13:141-148.
– reference: Lawson J, Baillie J. Endoscopic therapy for pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1995;5:181.
– reference: Hauters P, Weerts J, Navez B, Champault G, Peillon C, Totte E, et al. Laparoscopic treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:1645-1648.
– reference: Köhler H, Schafmayer A, Lüdtke F, Lepsien G, Peiper HJ. Surgical treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts. Br J Surg. 1987;74:813-815.
– reference: Palanivelu C, Senthilkumar K, Madhankumar MV, Rajan PS, Shetty AR, Jani K, et al. Management of pancreatic pseudocyst in the era of laparoscopic surgery-experience from a tertiary centre. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:2262-2267.
– reference: Oida T, Mimatsu K, Kano H, Kawasaki A, Kuboi Y, Fukino N, et al. Laparoscopic cystogastrostomy via the posterior approach for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage. Hepatogastroenterology. 2011;58:1771-1775.
– reference: Moran B, Rew D, Johnson C. Pancreatic pseudocyst should be treated by surgical drainage. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1994;76:54.
– reference: Aljarabah M, Ammori B. Laparoscopic and endoscopic approaches for drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: a systematic review of published series. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:1936-1944.
– reference: Warshaw AL, Rattner DW. Timing of surgical drainage for pancreatic pseudocyst. Clinical and chemical criteria. Ann Surg. 1985;202:720-724.
– reference: Huibregtse K, Schneider B, Vrij A, Tytgat G. Endoscopic pancreatic drainage in chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 1988;34:9-15.
– reference: Teixeira J, Gibbs K, Vaimakis S, Rezayat C. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y pancreatic cyst-jejunostomy. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:1910-1913.
– reference: Kahaleh M, Shami V, Conaway M, Tokar J, Rockoff T, De La Rue S, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst: a prospective comparison with conventional endoscopic drainage. Endoscopy. 2006;38:355-359.
– reference: Melman L, Azar R, Beddow K, Brunt LM, Halpin VJ, Eagon JC, et al. Primary and overall success rates for clinical outcomes after laparoscopic, endoscopic, and open pancreatic cystgastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocysts. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:267-271.
– reference: Hamza N, Ammori BJ. Laparoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: a methodological approach. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:148-155.
– volume: 58
  start-page: 1771
  year: 2011
  end-page: 1775
  article-title: Laparoscopic cystogastrostomy via the posterior approach for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage
  publication-title: Hepatogastroenterology
– volume: 74
  start-page: 813
  year: 1987
  end-page: 815
  article-title: Surgical treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts
  publication-title: Br J Surg
– volume: 26
  start-page: 110
  year: 2009
  end-page: 114
  article-title: Long‐term outcome of laparoscopic cystogastrostomy performed using a posterior approach with a stapling device
  publication-title: Dig Surg
– volume: 18
  start-page: 1645
  year: 2004
  end-page: 1648
  article-title: Laparoscopic treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
– volume: 23
  start-page: 267
  year: 2009
  end-page: 271
  article-title: Primary and overall success rates for clinical outcomes after laparoscopic, endoscopic, and open pancreatic cystgastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocysts
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
– volume: 14
  start-page: 148
  year: 2010
  end-page: 155
  article-title: Laparoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: a methodological approach
  publication-title: J Gastrointest Surg
– volume: 21
  start-page: 2262
  year: 2007
  end-page: 2267
  article-title: Management of pancreatic pseudocyst in the era of laparoscopic surgery–experience from a tertiary centre
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
– volume: 20
  start-page: 397
  year: 2003
  end-page: 406
  article-title: Pancreatic pseudocyst in chronic pancreatitis: endoscopic and surgical treatment
  publication-title: Dig Surg
– volume: 240
  start-page: 205
  year: 2004
  article-title: Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey
  publication-title: Ann Surg
– volume: 76
  start-page: 54
  year: 1994
  article-title: Pancreatic pseudocyst should be treated by surgical drainage
  publication-title: Ann R Coll Surg Engl
– volume: 38
  start-page: 355
  year: 2006
  end-page: 359
  article-title: Endoscopic ultrasound drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst: a prospective comparison with conventional endoscopic drainage
  publication-title: Endoscopy
– volume: 42
  start-page: 202
  year: 1995
  end-page: 207
  article-title: The efficacy of endoscopic treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
– volume: 326
  start-page: 403
  year: 1985
  end-page: 407
  article-title: Prediction of severity in acute pancreatitis: prospective comparison of three prognostic indices
  publication-title: Lancet
– start-page: 299
  year: 1991
  end-page: 309
– volume: 13
  start-page: 141
  year: 2003
  end-page: 148
  article-title: Minimally invasive approaches to the management of pancreatic pseudocysts: review of the literature
  publication-title: Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech
– volume: 21
  start-page: 1936
  year: 2007
  end-page: 1944
  article-title: Laparoscopic and endoscopic approaches for drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: a systematic review of published series
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
– volume: 17
  start-page: 1910
  year: 2003
  end-page: 1913
  article-title: Laparoscopic Roux‐en‐Y pancreatic cyst‐jejunostomy
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
– volume: 202
  start-page: 720
  year: 1985
  end-page: 724
  article-title: Timing of surgical drainage for pancreatic pseudocyst. Clinical and chemical criteria
  publication-title: Ann Surg
– volume: 5
  start-page: 181
  year: 1995
  article-title: Endoscopic therapy for pancreatic pseudocysts
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am
– volume: 145
  start-page: 583
  year: 2013
  end-page: 590
  article-title: Equal efficacy of endoscopic and surgical cystogastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage in a randomized trial
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
– volume: 34
  start-page: 9
  year: 1988
  end-page: 15
  article-title: Endoscopic pancreatic drainage in chronic pancreatitis
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
– volume: 111
  start-page: 518
  year: 1992
  end-page: 526
  article-title: Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy
  publication-title: Surgery
– ident: e_1_2_7_5_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0196-2
– ident: e_1_2_7_14_1
  doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.05.046
– volume: 58
  start-page: 1771
  year: 2011
  ident: e_1_2_7_17_1
  article-title: Laparoscopic cystogastrostomy via the posterior approach for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage
  publication-title: Hepatogastroenterology
– volume: 76
  start-page: 54
  year: 1994
  ident: e_1_2_7_20_1
  article-title: Pancreatic pseudocyst should be treated by surgical drainage
  publication-title: Ann R Coll Surg Engl
– ident: e_1_2_7_22_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(95)70092-7
– ident: e_1_2_7_2_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9515-2
– ident: e_1_2_7_23_1
  doi: 10.1159/000072706
– ident: e_1_2_7_10_1
  doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-1048-7
– ident: e_1_2_7_16_1
  doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
– ident: e_1_2_7_19_1
  doi: 10.1007/978-1-4471-3356-8_26
– ident: e_1_2_7_7_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(88)71221-3
– ident: e_1_2_7_6_1
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800740920
– ident: e_1_2_7_8_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9280-9
– ident: e_1_2_7_3_1
  doi: 10.1097/00000658-198512000-00010
– ident: e_1_2_7_11_1
  doi: 10.1159/000206144
– ident: e_1_2_7_4_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(85)92733-3
– volume: 111
  start-page: 518
  year: 1992
  ident: e_1_2_7_15_1
  article-title: Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy
  publication-title: Surgery
– ident: e_1_2_7_21_1
  doi: 10.1016/S1052-5157(18)30466-5
– ident: e_1_2_7_13_1
  doi: 10.1097/00129689-200306000-00001
– ident: e_1_2_7_18_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9365-y
– ident: e_1_2_7_9_1
  doi: 10.1055/s-2006-925249
– ident: e_1_2_7_12_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8801-x
SSID ssj0000313930
Score 2.1855466
Snippet Background Cystgastrostomy is the commonest method of internal drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (PPs). While large and persistent retrogastric pancreatic...
Cystgastrostomy is the commonest method of internal drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (PPs). While large and persistent retrogastric pancreatic pseudocysts...
Background Cystgastrostomy is the commonest method of internal drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (PPs). While large and persistent retrogastric pancreatic...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
wiley
istex
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 818
SubjectTerms Adult
Aged
Clinical outcomes
Cystgastrostomy
Cysts
Drainage - methods
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Gastrostomy - methods
Humans
Laparoscopic
Laparoscopy
Laparoscopy - methods
Laparotomy - methods
Male
Middle Aged
Pancreatic
Pancreatic Pseudocyst - surgery
Pancreatitis
Pseudocyst
Retrospective Studies
Surgery
Treatment Outcome
Title Laparoscopic versus open cystgastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocysts: a case-matched comparative study
URI https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-F3T5QMWX-F/fulltext.pdf
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fjhbp.138
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25082571
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1706900785
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1616477309
Volume 21
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVLSH
  databaseName: SpringerLink Journals
  customDbUrl:
  mediaType: online
  eissn: 1868-6982
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0000313930
  issn: 1868-6974
  databaseCode: AFBBN
  dateStart: 19970301
  isFulltext: true
  providerName: Library Specific Holdings
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lj9MwELZKe-GCQLwKCzISgkOVkpdTh9sWKFXFVovU1ZZTlDgOBZamahKJ3V_PTOw8uttKC5c-XCtxM1_mGzsznwl5zaxYJKYpDAjFueEynxuRF7mGFbsi8SWKZuE65Mncm565syVbdjptheAij4biam9dyf9YFdrArlgl-w-WrQ8KDfAZ7AuvYGF4vZWNvwDToRpluvkhBphfUWQD3A5rIC6z_HuY5VjSkf5WOZlw26sIUQw2mSziFDtlqthZAJcZELuCBWOdlq4EwRv12ZsB7AqYLE8NzK4Nt5dG6_iaVpvnRCugoRJK38IrdCjDZiH8Qun-fpRyM5jV7adhle4xwzzdJp9Is2Urr0kvWViurt07sDSpltqaJCZ0w9zjhuer_XuGst3Gd3y3qq6uMGq1PDHXbl2TuipqvsEXSn_25yraDC2HN5xY5QFco8o6gTHc_sKMuBELzuefg4mzYF9PzpfB5A7p2UAvZpf0jifj8bxe7kOJTL_c-ab-b5UUsmm_qwawExz18D7_s2_mszuRKiOhxX1yTyOAHis8PiAduX5IZBuLVGGRIhbpNSxSwCJtsEJbWHxPQ9pGIm0hkZZIfETOJp8WH6aG3sLDEC5MXQ1hsRhmGKbwYV4rHPjmCk_KBFgVmIJ7iZmMGAuZ49oJ1tMxSwpmhjKxnGhke4nzmHTX6Vo-JdTmMrZHCQ8l5iOgqBNEqnYCTsXjo0iGffK2unaB0Pr2uM3KRaCUue0Ar3IAV7lPXtU9N0rTZU-fN-XlrzscsnifHFX2CbRryALUpPIx-mZwrvpncNz4NC5cy7SAPh5K-QHB-n3yRNm1Phm4SA5casEoSkMfHGYwm45P4f3ZbYf7nNxt7sgj0s23hXwBYXUevdSQ_Qu_xtP7
linkProvider Library Specific Holdings
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Laparoscopic+versus+open+cystgastrostomy+for+pancreatic+pseudocysts%3A+a+case-matched+comparative+study&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+hepato-biliary-pancreatic+sciences&rft.au=Khaled%2C+Yazan+S.&rft.au=Malde%2C+Deep+J.&rft.au=Packer%2C+Jessica&rft.au=Fox%2C+Thomas&rft.date=2014-11-01&rft.pub=Blackwell+Publishing+Ltd&rft.issn=1868-6974&rft.eissn=1868-6982&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=818&rft.epage=823&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fjhbp.138&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=ark_67375_WNG_F3T5QMWX_F
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1868-6974&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1868-6974&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1868-6974&client=summon