Upper Pole Heminephrectomy Versus Lower Pole Ureteroureterostomy for Ectopic Upper Pole Ureters
Purpose of Review Ureteral duplication and ectopic upper pole ureters are commonly associated with renal pathology, including vesicoureteral reflux, obstruction, infection, and renal function loss. There remains no consensus on the most appropriate management of these complex patients. In this revie...
Saved in:
| Published in | Current urology reports Vol. 18; no. 3; p. 21 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
New York
Springer US
01.03.2017
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 1527-2737 1534-6285 1534-6285 |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11934-017-0664-0 |
Cover
| Abstract | Purpose of Review
Ureteral duplication and ectopic upper pole ureters are commonly associated with renal pathology, including vesicoureteral reflux, obstruction, infection, and renal function loss. There remains no consensus on the most appropriate management of these complex patients. In this review, we sought to compare existing data on upper pole heminephrectomy with ipsilateral ureteroureterostomy.
Recent Findings
Application of magnetic resonance imaging and minimally invasive techniques have led to changes in the diagnosis and treatment of ectopic upper pole ureters. Recent studies have highlighted the safety of laparoscopic and robot-assisted upper pole heminephrectomy and ureteroureterostomy.
Summary
Minimally invasive approaches to ectopic upper pole ureters appear safe and effective, with complication rates remaining low. Minimally invasive upper pole heminephrectomy carries a higher risk of lower pole function loss. Both upper pole heminephrectomy and ureteroureterostomy carry a small risk of additional surgery on the bladder and remnant ureter. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Ureteral duplication and ectopic upper pole ureters are commonly associated with renal pathology, including vesicoureteral reflux, obstruction, infection, and renal function loss. There remains no consensus on the most appropriate management of these complex patients. In this review, we sought to compare existing data on upper pole heminephrectomy with ipsilateral ureteroureterostomy.
Application of magnetic resonance imaging and minimally invasive techniques have led to changes in the diagnosis and treatment of ectopic upper pole ureters. Recent studies have highlighted the safety of laparoscopic and robot-assisted upper pole heminephrectomy and ureteroureterostomy. Minimally invasive approaches to ectopic upper pole ureters appear safe and effective, with complication rates remaining low. Minimally invasive upper pole heminephrectomy carries a higher risk of lower pole function loss. Both upper pole heminephrectomy and ureteroureterostomy carry a small risk of additional surgery on the bladder and remnant ureter. Ureteral duplication and ectopic upper pole ureters are commonly associated with renal pathology, including vesicoureteral reflux, obstruction, infection, and renal function loss. There remains no consensus on the most appropriate management of these complex patients. In this review, we sought to compare existing data on upper pole heminephrectomy with ipsilateral ureteroureterostomy.PURPOSE OF REVIEWUreteral duplication and ectopic upper pole ureters are commonly associated with renal pathology, including vesicoureteral reflux, obstruction, infection, and renal function loss. There remains no consensus on the most appropriate management of these complex patients. In this review, we sought to compare existing data on upper pole heminephrectomy with ipsilateral ureteroureterostomy.Application of magnetic resonance imaging and minimally invasive techniques have led to changes in the diagnosis and treatment of ectopic upper pole ureters. Recent studies have highlighted the safety of laparoscopic and robot-assisted upper pole heminephrectomy and ureteroureterostomy. Minimally invasive approaches to ectopic upper pole ureters appear safe and effective, with complication rates remaining low. Minimally invasive upper pole heminephrectomy carries a higher risk of lower pole function loss. Both upper pole heminephrectomy and ureteroureterostomy carry a small risk of additional surgery on the bladder and remnant ureter.RECENT FINDINGSApplication of magnetic resonance imaging and minimally invasive techniques have led to changes in the diagnosis and treatment of ectopic upper pole ureters. Recent studies have highlighted the safety of laparoscopic and robot-assisted upper pole heminephrectomy and ureteroureterostomy. Minimally invasive approaches to ectopic upper pole ureters appear safe and effective, with complication rates remaining low. Minimally invasive upper pole heminephrectomy carries a higher risk of lower pole function loss. Both upper pole heminephrectomy and ureteroureterostomy carry a small risk of additional surgery on the bladder and remnant ureter. Purpose of Review Ureteral duplication and ectopic upper pole ureters are commonly associated with renal pathology, including vesicoureteral reflux, obstruction, infection, and renal function loss. There remains no consensus on the most appropriate management of these complex patients. In this review, we sought to compare existing data on upper pole heminephrectomy with ipsilateral ureteroureterostomy. Recent Findings Application of magnetic resonance imaging and minimally invasive techniques have led to changes in the diagnosis and treatment of ectopic upper pole ureters. Recent studies have highlighted the safety of laparoscopic and robot-assisted upper pole heminephrectomy and ureteroureterostomy. Summary Minimally invasive approaches to ectopic upper pole ureters appear safe and effective, with complication rates remaining low. Minimally invasive upper pole heminephrectomy carries a higher risk of lower pole function loss. Both upper pole heminephrectomy and ureteroureterostomy carry a small risk of additional surgery on the bladder and remnant ureter. |
| ArticleNumber | 21 |
| Author | Michaud, Jason E. Akhavan, Ardavan |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Jason E. surname: Michaud fullname: Michaud, Jason E. organization: Department of Urology, Division of Pediatric Urology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine – sequence: 2 givenname: Ardavan surname: Akhavan fullname: Akhavan, Ardavan email: aakhava3@jhmi.edu organization: Department of Urology, Division of Pediatric Urology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Charlotte R. Bloomberg Children’s Center, Johns Hopkins University |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28233227$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0E4lH4ADYoSzaB8SOxu0RVoUiVYEHZWo47gVRJHOxEiL_HJa2EWLCakXXuleeckcPWtUjIJYUbCiBvA6VTLlKgMoU8j8sBOaVZfMmZyg63O5Mpk1yekLMQNgAMQIljcsIU45wxeUr0quvQJ8-uxmSBTdVi9-7R9q75Sl7RhyEkS_e5J1Yee_RuGEf4oUrnk3kMdJVNfpWNaDgnR6WpA17s5oSs7ucvs0W6fHp4nN0tUyso9CljBeeFQCURcsHotFS54AymYJg1TBZW2azE6XpdyiLLxDovDDclKIRC2Az4hFyPvZ13HwOGXjdVsFjXpkU3BE2VZJkCoUREr3boUDS41p2vGuO_9F5KBOQI2Hhj8FhqW_Wmr1zbe1PVmoLe6tejfh31661-vf0F_ZPcl_-XYWMmRLZ9Q683UXAbZf0T-gZEzpeI |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_36303_AUJ_0029 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_23609 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpurol_2024_08_005 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00383_020_04852_4 crossref_primary_10_1002_iju5_12401 crossref_primary_10_1007_s42804_020_00047_9 crossref_primary_10_18821_1560_9510_2018_22_6_306_308 crossref_primary_10_3389_fped_2022_1056349 crossref_primary_10_3389_fsurg_2022_1019161 crossref_primary_10_46563_1560_9561_2024_27_5_394_398 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpurol_2022_10_010 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_juro_2017_09_080 crossref_primary_10_48095_cccu2024019 crossref_primary_10_21886_2308_6424_2022_10_3_138_144 crossref_primary_10_1177_20514158221099384 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2018_06_028 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11701_022_01372_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11255_024_04108_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpurol_2024_01_008 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpurol_2018_06_011 crossref_primary_10_21886_2308_6424_2021_9_4_133_141 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2021_01_032 crossref_primary_10_18821_1560_9510_2018_22_2_102_104 crossref_primary_10_3389_fped_2021_637544 crossref_primary_10_1111_jsap_13399 crossref_primary_10_36303_AUJ_0057 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00092_019_3025_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2021_12_028 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.01.025 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)70379-5 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)55330-6 10.1097/01.ju.0000148374.64478.b5 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.09038.x 10.1046/j.1464-410X.1997.00413.x 10.1016/j.jpurol.2007.12.003 10.1097/01.ju.0000154164.99648.ee 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64606-X 10.1089/end.2015.0645 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1995.tb07357.x 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)38806-7 10.1016/0090-4295(74)90240-4 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)50842-3 10.1016/j.jpurol.2011.02.029 10.1016/0090-4295(80)90412-4 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)67144-1 10.1016/j.jpurol.2010.08.004 10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00289-1 10.1016/j.urology.2014.10.014 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00210-7 10.1016/j.jpurol.2011.03.007 10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00601-X 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64442-2 10.1007/BF00971815 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)68073-X 10.1007/s11701-009-0153-7 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1969.tb09909.x 10.1016/j.jpurol.2005.01.003 10.1016/j.juro.2007.01.177 10.1016/0090-4295(75)90008-4 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)57303-6 10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00342-9 10.2214/ajr.148.3.497 10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.04.021 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)56194-7 10.1089/end.2015.0223 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67857-3 10.1097/00005392-200009020-00045 10.1089/end.2006.0227 10.1089/end.2011.0252 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64722-2 10.1089/end.2014.0818 10.1097/00005392-200102000-00067 10.1016/j.eucr.2015.07.003 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00184-9 10.1089/end.2014.0113 10.1007/s00247-014-2905-4 10.1016/j.urology.2010.02.061 10.1097/01.ju.0000154163.67420.4d 10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.610 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)61160-1 10.1089/end.2012.0379 10.1016/j.juro.2012.07.015 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64441-0 10.1016/j.jpurol.2013.10.014 10.1097/01.ju.0000175943.95989.41 10.1089/end.2012.0041 10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.073 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)00429-X 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)57637-5 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65803-8 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.08.015 10.1542/peds.27.6.971 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)63983-1 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017 |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11934-017-0664-0 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine |
| EISSN | 1534-6285 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 28233227 10_1007_s11934_017_0664_0 |
| Genre | Journal Article Review |
| GroupedDBID | --- -5E -5G -BR -EM -Y2 -~C .86 .VR 06C 06D 0R~ 0VY 1N0 203 29F 29~ 2J2 2JN 2JY 2KG 2KM 2LR 2VQ 2~H 30V 4.4 406 408 40D 40E 53G 5GY 5VS 6NX 875 8TC 8UJ 95- 95. 95~ 96X AAAVM AABHQ AACDK AAHNG AAIAL AAJBT AAJKR AANXM AANZL AARHV AARTL AASML AATNV AATVU AAUYE AAWCG AAYIU AAYQN AAYTO AAYZH ABAKF ABDZT ABECU ABFTV ABHQN ABIPD ABJNI ABJOX ABKCH ABMNI ABMQK ABNWP ABPLI ABQBU ABSXP ABTEG ABTKH ABTMW ABWNU ABXPI ACAOD ACDTI ACGFS ACHSB ACHXU ACKNC ACMDZ ACMLO ACOKC ACOMO ACPIV ACREN ACSNA ACZOJ ADHHG ADHIR ADINQ ADJJI ADKNI ADKPE ADRFC ADTPH ADURQ ADYFF ADYOE ADZKW AEBTG AEFQL AEGAL AEGNC AEGXH AEJHL AEJRE AEMSY AENEX AEOHA AEPYU AESKC AETLH AEVLU AEXYK AFBBN AFLOW AFQWF AFWTZ AFYQB AFZKB AGAYW AGDGC AGJBK AGMZJ AGQEE AGQMX AGRTI AGWIL AGWZB AGYKE AHAVH AHBYD AHIZS AHSBF AHYZX AIAKS AIGIU AIIXL AILAN AITGF AJBLW AJRNO AJZVZ ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALWAN AMKLP AMTXH AMXSW AMYLF AMYQR AOCGG ARMRJ AXYYD B-. BA0 BDATZ BGNMA C1A CAG COF CS3 CSCUP CUW DDRTE DNIVK DPUIP EBD EBLON EBS EIOEI EJD EMOBN ESBYG F5P FERAY FFXSO FIGPU FINBP FNLPD FRRFC FSGXE FWDCC G-Y G-Z GGCAI GGRSB GJIRD GNWQR GQ6 GQ7 H13 HF~ HG6 HMJXF HRMNR HZ~ IJ- IKXTQ IMOTQ IWAJR IXC IXD IXE I~Z J-C JBSCW JZLTJ KOV LLZTM M4Y MA- N9A NPVJJ NQJWS NU0 O9- O9J P9S PF0 PT4 QOR QOS R89 R9I ROL RPX RSV S16 S1Z S27 S37 S3B SAP SDH SHX SISQX SJYHP SMD SNE SNPRN SNX SOHCF SOJ SPISZ SRMVM SSLCW SSXJD STPWE SV3 SZ9 SZN T13 TSG TSK TSV TUC U2A U9L UG4 UOJIU UTJUX UZXMN VC2 VFIZW W48 WK8 YLTOR Z7U Z82 Z87 ZMTXR ZOVNA ~A9 AAPKM AAYXX ABBRH ABDBE ABFSG ACMFV ACSTC AEZWR AFDZB AFHIU AFOHR AHPBZ AHWEU AIXLP ATHPR AYFIA CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 ABRTQ |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-22b33b4e87e064219f86432090a2ca27bc8c5fe9ddf7b554d6ba3af08e0b4c503 |
| IEDL.DBID | U2A |
| ISSN | 1527-2737 1534-6285 |
| IngestDate | Fri Sep 05 12:25:14 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:08:04 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:00:34 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:08:53 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 21 02:36:37 EST 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 3 |
| Keywords | Heminephrectomy Ureteral duplication Ureteroureterostomy Ureterocele Vesicoureteral reflux Ectopic ureter |
| Language | English |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c410t-22b33b4e87e064219f86432090a2ca27bc8c5fe9ddf7b554d6ba3af08e0b4c503 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 |
| PMID | 28233227 |
| PQID | 1872580484 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1872580484 pubmed_primary_28233227 crossref_citationtrail_10_1007_s11934_017_0664_0 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11934_017_0664_0 springer_journals_10_1007_s11934_017_0664_0 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2017-03-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2017-03-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 2017 text: 2017-03-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | New York |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: New York – name: United States |
| PublicationTitle | Current urology reports |
| PublicationTitleAbbrev | Curr Urol Rep |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Curr Urol Rep |
| PublicationYear | 2017 |
| Publisher | Springer US |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Springer US |
| References | Figueroa VH, Chavhan GB, Oudjhane K, Farhat W. Utility of MR urography in children suspected of having ectopic ureter. Pediatr Radiol. 2014;44:956–62. This manuscript documents the utility of MRU in diagnosing ectopic duplex urters, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 75–88%. LeeYSHahYSKimM-JJungHJLeeM-JImYJFactors associated with complications of the ureteral stump after proximal ureteroureterostomyJ Urol20121881890410.1016/j.juro.2012.07.01522998921 LevyJBVandersteenDRMorgensternBZHusmannDAHypertension after surgical management of renal duplication associated with an upper pole ureteroceleJ Urol1997158124141:STN:280:DyaK2svgt1yjtA%3D%3D10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64441-09258184 GearhartJGRinkRCMouriquandPDEPediatric urology2009PhiladelphiaElsevier Health Sciences Siomou E, Papadopoulou F, Kollios KD, Photopoulos A, Evagelidou E, Androulakakis P, et al. Duplex collecting system diagnosed during the first 6 years of life after a first urinary tract infection: a study of 63 children. J Urol. 2006;175:678-681-682. WangM-HGreenfieldSPWilliotPRutkowskiJEctopic ureteroceles in duplex systems: long-term follow up and “treatment-free” statusJ Pediatr Urol20084183710.1016/j.jpurol.2007.12.00318631922 VatesTSBukowskiTTriestJFreedmanASmithCPerlmutterAIs there a best alternative to treating the obstructed upper pole?J Urol199615674461:STN:280:DyaK283ovFCgsA%3D%3D10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65803-88683774 LeavittDARambachanAHabermanKDeMarcoRShuklaARRobot-assisted laparoscopic ipsilateral ureteroureterostomy for ectopic ureters in children: description of techniqueJ Endourol20122612798310.1089/end.2012.004122563798 PetersonLJGrimesJHWeinerthJLGlennJFBlind-ending branches of bifid uretersUrology1975519151:STN:280:DyaE2M7gtlKrsw%3D%3D10.1016/0090-4295(75)90008-41114554 HerzDDaJustaDChingCMcLeodDSegmental arterial mapping during pediatric robot-assisted laparoscopic heminephrectomy: a descriptive seriesJ Pediatr Urol201612266.e161:STN:280:DC%2BC2s7hs1Wjuw%3D%3D10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.04.021 GrimsbyGMMerchantZJacobsMAGargolloPCLaparoscopic-assisted ureteroureterostomy for duplication anomalies in childrenJ Endourol2014281173710.1089/end.2014.011325010444 BolducSUpadhyayJShermanCFarhatWBagliDJMcLorieGAHistology of upper pole is unaffected by prenatal diagnosis in duplex system ureterocelesJ Urol20021681123610.1016/S0022-5347(05)64606-X12187250 Smith FL, Ritchie EL, Maizels M, Zaontz MR, Hsueh W, Kaplan WE, et al. Surgery for duplex kidneys with ectopic ureters: ipsilateral ureteroureterostomy versus polar nephrectomy. J Urol. 1989;142:532-534-543. PiaggioLFranc-GuimondJFigueroaTEBartholdJSGonzálezRComparison of laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy for duplication anomalies in childrenJ Urol200617522697310.1016/S0022-5347(06)00342-916697852 LeongJMikhaelBSchillingerJFRefluxing ureterocelesJ Urol198012413691:STN:280:DyaL3M%2FgvFOrtw%3D%3D7411702 MarshallFFMcLoughlinMGLong blind-ending ureteral duplicationsJ Urol197812062681:STN:280:DyaE1M%2FltVOjuw%3D%3D712911 FehrenbakerLGKelalisPPSticklerGBVesicoureteral reflux and ureteral duplication in childrenJ Urol197210786241:STN:280:DyaE387ntVCltA%3D%3D5022560 DanglePPAkhavanAOdeleyeMAveryDLendvayTKohCJNinety-day perioperative complications of pediatric robotic urological surgery: a multi-institutional studyJ Pediatr Urol201612102.e161:STN:280:DC%2BC28jisleksQ%3D%3D10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.08.015This large mutli-institutional series documents complications among pediatric robotic procedures, including RALHN and RALUU, demonstrating similar complication rates UsonACLattimerJKMelicowMMUreteroceles in infants and children: a report based on 44 casesPediatrics196127971831:STN:280:DyaF3c%2FpvFGltA%3D%3D13779382 CampbellMFCampbellMFHarrisonJHAnomalies of the ureterUrology19703PhiladelphiaWB Saunders1487670 TomaszewskiJJCasellaDPTurnerRMCasalePOstMCPediatric laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: technical considerationsJ Endourol2012266021310.1089/end.2011.025222050504 Mason MD, Anthony Herndon CD, Smith-Harrison LI, Peters CA, Corbett ST. Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy in duplicated collecting systems in the pediatric population: techniques and outcomes. J Pediatr Urol. 2014;10:374–9. This manuscript addresses technical concerns regarding RALUU and demonstrates a low complication rate among 21 patients with duplex collecting systems. LeeYSImYJShinSHBascunaRTHaJYHanSWComplications after common sheath reimplantation in pediatric patients with complicated duplex systemUrology2015854576210.1016/j.urology.2014.10.01425623719 BissetGSStrifeJLThe duplex collecting system in girls with urinary tract infection: prevalence and significanceAJR Am J Roentgenol198714849750010.2214/ajr.148.3.4973492875 JayramGRobertsJHernandezAHelouryYManoharanSGodbolePOutcomes and fate of the remnant moiety following laparoscopic heminephrectomy for duplex kidney: a multicenter reviewJ Pediatr Urol2011727251:STN:280:DC%2BC3MrpsVKguw%3D%3D10.1016/j.jpurol.2011.02.02921527211 AfsharKPapanikolaouFMalekRBagliDPippi-SalleJLKhouryAVesicoureteral reflux and complete ureteral duplication. Conservative or surgical management?J Urol20051731725710.1097/01.ju.0000154164.99648.ee15821569 MandellJColodnyAHLebowitzRBauerSBRetikABUreteroceles in infants and childrenJ Urol198012392161:STN:280:DyaL3c3gslWgsw%3D%3D7382011 Biles MJ, Finkelstein JB, Silva MV, Lambert SM, Casale P. Innovation in robotics and pediatric urology: robotic ureteroureterostomy for duplex systems with ureteral ectopia. J Endourol. 2016;30:1041–8. This publication demonstrates the safety of RALUU, with no complications or reoperations among 12 patients with duplex collecting systems. SumfestJMBurnsMWMitchellMEPseudoureterocele: potential for misdiagnosis of an ectopic ureter as a ureteroceleBr J Urol19957540151:STN:280:DyaK2M3ltlOrtA%3D%3D10.1111/j.1464-410X.1995.tb07357.x7735809 JohnstonJHJohnsonLMExperiences with ectopic ureterocelesBr J Urol19694161701:STN:280:DyaF1M7js1GgsQ%3D%3D10.1111/j.1464-410X.1969.tb09909.x5774537 Malik RD, Pariser JJ, Gundeti MS. Outcomes in pediatric robot-assisted laparoscopic heminephrectomy compared with contemporary open and laparoscopic series. J Endourol. 2015;29:1346–52. This paper reports outcomes in patients with duplex collecting systems treated with RALHN., with mean renal function loss of 2.6% in 7 patients, and 1 patient (14%) with renal loss over 10% in addition to 2 reoperations (12.5%) for removal of a ureteral remnant. PlaireJCPopeJCKroppBPAdamsMCKeatingMARinkRCManagement of ectopic ureters: experience with the upper tract approachJ Urol1997158124571:STN:280:DyaK2svgt1yjtQ%3D%3D10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64442-29258185 AbelCLendonMGoughDCHistology of the upper pole in complete urinary duplication—does it affect surgical management?Br J Urol19978066351:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FhsVSktA%3D%3D10.1046/j.1464-410X.1997.00413.x9352710 HusmannDARenal dysplasia: the risks and consequences of leaving dysplastic tissue in situUrology19985253361:STN:280:DyaK1cvjsVSgsw%3D%3D10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00289-19763067 HusmannDAEwaltDHGlenskiWJBernierPAUreterocele associated with ureteral duplication and a nonfunctioning upper pole segment: management by partial nephroureterectomy aloneJ Urol199515472361:STN:280:DyaK2Mzjtlequw%3D%3D10.1016/S0022-5347(01)67144-17609163 ElderJSDiazMCaldamoneAACendronMGreenfieldSHurwitzREndoscopic therapy for vesicoureteral reflux: a meta-analysis. I. Reflux resolution and urinary tract infectionJ Urol20061757162210.1016/S0022-5347(05)00210-716407037 BansalDCostNGBeanCMNohPHPediatric laparo-endoscopic single site partial nephrectomy: feasibility in infants and small children for upper urinary tract duplication anomaliesJ Pediatr Urol201410859631:STN:280:DC%2BC2crgvFKlsA%3D%3D10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.01.02524598458 GonzálezRPiaggioLInitial experience with laparoscopic ipsilateral ureteroureterostomy in infants and children for duplication anomalies of the urinary tractJ Urol20071772315810.1016/j.juro.2007.01.17717509348 Vereecken RL, Proesmans W. Extensive surgery on the trigone for complete ureteral duplication does not cause incontinence or voiding problems. Urology. 2000;55:267-270-271. KutikovANguyenMGuzzoTCanterDCasalePLaparoscopic and robotic complex upper-tract reconstruction in children with a duplex collecting systemJ Endourol200721621410.1089/end.2006.022717638558 CasalePLambertSRobotic ureteroureterostomy in children with a duplex collecting systemJ Robot Surg2009316110.1007/s11701-009-0153-727638372 Cooper CS, Passerini-Glazel G, Hutcheson JC, Iafrate M, Camuffo C, Milani C, et al. Long-term followup of endoscopic incision of ureteroceles: intravesical versus extravesical. J Urol. 2000;164:1097-1099-1100. Joyeux L, Lacreuse I, Schneider A, Moog R, Borgnon J, Lopez M, et al. Long-term functional renal outcomes after retroperitoneoscopic upper pole heminephrectomy for duplex kidney in children: a multicenter cohort study. Surg Endosc. 2016. This manuscript reports renal outcomes following laparoscopic retroperitoneal heminephrectomy with a mean of 7 years follow-up. They demonstrate renal function loss in four patients (17%), with losses ranging from 6 to 18%. WangM-HPersistent urinary incontinence: a case series of missed ectopic uretersUrol Case Rep20153223510.1016/j.eucr.2015.07.003267935604714319 Han MY, Gibbons MD, Belman AB, Pohl HG, Majd M, Rushton HG. Indications for nonoperative management of ureteroceles. J Urol. 2005;174:1652-1655-1656. OlsenLHJørgensenTMRobotically assisted retroperitoneoscopic heminephrectomy in children: initial clinical resultsJ Pediatr Urol2005110141:STN:280:DC%2BD1cnotlanug%3D%3D10.1016/j.jpurol.2005.01.00318947545 GundetiMSRansleyPGDuffyPGCuckowPMWilcoxDTRenal outcome following heminephrectomy for duplex kidneyJ Urol2005173174341:STN:280:DC%2BD2M7ps1Omtw%3D%3D10.1097/01.ju.0000154163.67420.4d15821573 CabezaliDMaruszewskiPLópezFAransayAGomezAComplications and late outcome in transperitoneal laparoscopic heminephrectomy for duplex kidney in childrenJ Endourol201327133810.1089/end.2012.037923005915 LashleyDBMcAleerIMKapl YS Lee (664_CR45) 2012; 188 GM Grimsby (664_CR57) 2014; 28 D Bansal (664_CR40) 2014; 10 GS Bisset (664_CR15) 1987; 148 D You (664_CR47) 2010; 106 J Wiygul (664_CR58) 2011; 7 LG Fehrenbaker (664_CR4) 1972; 107 C Abel (664_CR23) 1997; 80 L Piaggio (664_CR46) 2006; 175 DA Husmann (664_CR61) 1998; 52 664_CR59 CD Gran (664_CR27) 2005; 173 LJ Peterson (664_CR24) 1975; 5 M-H Wang (664_CR33) 2008; 4 664_CR53 JG Gearhart (664_CR1) 2009 D Cabezali (664_CR44) 2013; 27 P Casale (664_CR55) 2009; 3 G Jayram (664_CR49) 2011; 7 664_CR39 WA Brock (664_CR9) 1978; 119 JH Johnston (664_CR11) 1969; 41 MJ Hagg (664_CR13) 2000; 163 A Kutikov (664_CR66) 2007; 21 FF Marshall (664_CR25) 1978; 120 JM Sumfest (664_CR14) 1995; 75 EF Nation (664_CR3) 1944; 51 PP Dangle (664_CR68) 2016; 12 JB Levy (664_CR60) 1997; 158 M-H Wang (664_CR16) 2015; 3 664_CR42 D Herz (664_CR41) 2016; 12 E Byun (664_CR36) 2006; 176 SS Ambrose (664_CR5) 1964; 92 K Afshar (664_CR29) 2005; 173 O Adorisio (664_CR32) 2011; 77 DA Leavitt (664_CR63) 2012; 26 J Mandell (664_CR8) 1980; 123 664_CR30 R González (664_CR65) 2007; 177 DB Lashley (664_CR62) 2001; 165 664_CR37 DW Storm (664_CR56) 2011; 7 EV Perrin (664_CR22) 1974; 4 664_CR34 YS Lee (664_CR28) 2015; 85 LH Olsen (664_CR43) 2005; 1 DA Husmann (664_CR48) 1995; 154 GT Klauber (664_CR17) 1980; 15 MS Gundeti (664_CR52) 2005; 173 AA Caldamone (664_CR12) 1984; 131 MF Campbell (664_CR6) 1970 664_CR19 664_CR2 F Diard (664_CR18) 1981; 11 TS Vates (664_CR54) 1996; 156 AC Uson (664_CR7) 1961; 27 D Caluwe De (664_CR51) 2002; 168 JJ Tomaszewski (664_CR38) 2012; 26 JC Plaire (664_CR50) 1997; 158 664_CR26 JS Elder (664_CR31) 2006; 175 J Leong (664_CR10) 1980; 124 VR Jayanthi (664_CR35) 1999; 162 664_CR67 664_CR20 664_CR64 S Bolduc (664_CR21) 2002; 168 712911 - J Urol. 1978 Nov;120(5):626-8 7735809 - Br J Urol. 1995 Mar;75(3):401-5 6726912 - J Urol. 1984 Jun;131(6):1130-2 24268881 - J Pediatr Urol. 2014 Apr;10(2):374-9 22998921 - J Urol. 2012 Nov;188(5):1890-4 10958751 - J Urol. 2000 Sep;164(3 Pt 2):1097-9; discussion 1099-100 25010444 - J Endourol. 2014 Oct;28(10):1173-7 15592074 - J Urol. 2005 Jan;173(1):198-201 26793560 - Urol Case Rep. 2015 Aug 25;3(6):223-5 16697852 - J Urol. 2006 Jun;175(6):2269-73 27638372 - J Robot Surg. 2009 Oct;3(3):161 23005915 - J Endourol. 2013 Feb;27(2):133-8 20869918 - J Pediatr Urol. 2011 Oct;7(5):529-33 9258184 - J Urol. 1997 Sep;158(3 Pt 2):1241-4 27321559 - J Pediatr Urol. 2016 Aug;12 (4):266.e1-6 7411702 - J Urol. 1980 Jul;124(1):136-9 21527211 - J Pediatr Urol. 2011 Jun;7(3):272-5 3492875 - AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987 Mar;148(3):497-500 16407037 - J Urol. 2006 Feb;175(2):716-22 21527238 - J Pediatr Urol. 2011 Jun;7(3):257-60 10458435 - J Urol. 1999 Sep;162(3 Pt 2):1077-80 11176433 - J Urol. 2001 Feb;165(2):552-4 7609163 - J Urol. 1995 Aug;154(2 Pt 2):723-6 5774537 - Br J Urol. 1969 Feb;41(1):61-70 4454103 - Urology. 1974 Dec;4(6):660-4 26897324 - J Pediatr Urol. 2016 Apr;12 (2):102.e1-6 10688025 - J Urol. 2000 Mar;163(3):940-3 8683774 - J Urol. 1996 Aug;156(2 Pt 2):744-6 25623719 - Urology. 2015 Feb;85(2):457-62 19110277 - J Urol. 2009 Feb;181(2):823-8; discussion 828-9 17509348 - J Urol. 2007 Jun;177(6):2315-8 10688092 - Urology. 2000 Feb;55(2):267-70; discussion 270-1 19888983 - BJU Int. 2010 Jul;106(2):250-4 15821573 - J Urol. 2005 May;173(5):1743-4 5022560 - J Urol. 1972 May;107(5):862-4 16148674 - J Urol. 2005 Oct;174(4 Pt 2):1652-5; discussion 1655-6 21168903 - Urology. 2011 Jan;77(1):191-4 16407023 - J Urol. 2006 Feb;175(2):678-81; discussion 681-2 9352710 - Br J Urol. 1997 Oct;80(4):663-5 9258185 - J Urol. 1997 Sep;158(3 Pt 2):1245-7 14226469 - J Urol. 1964 Nov;92:439-44 9763067 - Urology. 1998 Oct;52(4):533-6 7382011 - J Urol. 1980 Jun;123(6):921-6 18947545 - J Pediatr Urol. 2005 Apr;1(2):101-4 660767 - J Urol. 1978 Jun;119(6):800-3 18631922 - J Pediatr Urol. 2008 Jun;4(3):183-7 1114554 - Urology. 1975 Feb;5(2):191-5 16945677 - J Urol. 2006 Oct;176(4 Pt 2):1871-7; discussion 1877 15821569 - J Urol. 2005 May;173(5):1725-7 17638558 - J Endourol. 2007 Jun;21(6):621-4 24598458 - J Pediatr Urol. 2014 Oct;10(5):859-63 13779382 - Pediatrics. 1961 Jun;27:971-83 27542552 - J Endourol. 2016 Oct;30(10 ):1041-1048 12187250 - J Urol. 2002 Sep;168(3):1123-6 7322652 - Pediatr Radiol. 1981;11(3):139-42 7355541 - Urology. 1980 Feb;15(2):164-6 22563798 - J Endourol. 2012 Oct;26(10):1279-83 27697471 - J Pediatr Urol. 2017 Feb;13(1):56.e1-56.e7 12131348 - J Urol. 2002 Aug;168(2):679-80 22050504 - J Endourol. 2012 Jun;26(6):602-13 2746774 - J Urol. 1989 Aug;142(2 Pt 2):532-4; discussion 542-3 |
| References_xml | – reference: LeavittDARambachanAHabermanKDeMarcoRShuklaARRobot-assisted laparoscopic ipsilateral ureteroureterostomy for ectopic ureters in children: description of techniqueJ Endourol20122612798310.1089/end.2012.004122563798 – reference: WangM-HGreenfieldSPWilliotPRutkowskiJEctopic ureteroceles in duplex systems: long-term follow up and “treatment-free” statusJ Pediatr Urol20084183710.1016/j.jpurol.2007.12.00318631922 – reference: Lee RS, Sethi AS, Passerotti CC, Retik AB, Borer JG, Nguyen HT, et al. Robot assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a viable and safe option in children. J Urol. 2009;181:823-828-829. – reference: MandellJColodnyAHLebowitzRBauerSBRetikABUreteroceles in infants and childrenJ Urol198012392161:STN:280:DyaL3c3gslWgsw%3D%3D7382011 – reference: AdorisioOEliaALandiLTavernaMMalvasioVDantiADEffectiveness of primary endoscopic incision in treatment of ectopic ureterocele associated with duplex systemUrology201177191410.1016/j.urology.2010.02.06121168903 – reference: Arevalo MK, Prieto JC, Cost N, Nuss G, Brown BJ, Baker LA. Utility of retrograde ureterocelogram in management of complex ureterocele. J Pediatr Urol. 2016. – reference: HerzDDaJustaDChingCMcLeodDSegmental arterial mapping during pediatric robot-assisted laparoscopic heminephrectomy: a descriptive seriesJ Pediatr Urol201612266.e161:STN:280:DC%2BC2s7hs1Wjuw%3D%3D10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.04.021 – reference: AbelCLendonMGoughDCHistology of the upper pole in complete urinary duplication—does it affect surgical management?Br J Urol19978066351:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FhsVSktA%3D%3D10.1046/j.1464-410X.1997.00413.x9352710 – reference: ByunEMerguerianPAA meta-analysis of surgical practice patterns in the endoscopic management of ureterocelesJ Urol20061761871710.1016/S0022-5347(06)00601-X16945677discussion 1877 – reference: TomaszewskiJJCasellaDPTurnerRMCasalePOstMCPediatric laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: technical considerationsJ Endourol2012266021310.1089/end.2011.025222050504 – reference: LeeYSImYJShinSHBascunaRTHaJYHanSWComplications after common sheath reimplantation in pediatric patients with complicated duplex systemUrology2015854576210.1016/j.urology.2014.10.01425623719 – reference: OlsenLHJørgensenTMRobotically assisted retroperitoneoscopic heminephrectomy in children: initial clinical resultsJ Pediatr Urol2005110141:STN:280:DC%2BD1cnotlanug%3D%3D10.1016/j.jpurol.2005.01.00318947545 – reference: WangM-HPersistent urinary incontinence: a case series of missed ectopic uretersUrol Case Rep20153223510.1016/j.eucr.2015.07.003267935604714319 – reference: • Malik RD, Pariser JJ, Gundeti MS. Outcomes in pediatric robot-assisted laparoscopic heminephrectomy compared with contemporary open and laparoscopic series. J Endourol. 2015;29:1346–52. This paper reports outcomes in patients with duplex collecting systems treated with RALHN., with mean renal function loss of 2.6% in 7 patients, and 1 patient (14%) with renal loss over 10% in addition to 2 reoperations (12.5%) for removal of a ureteral remnant. – reference: WiygulJPalmerLSThe inguinal approach to extravesical ureteral reimplantation is safe, effective, and efficientJ Pediatr Urol201172576010.1016/j.jpurol.2011.03.00721527238 – reference: ElderJSDiazMCaldamoneAACendronMGreenfieldSHurwitzREndoscopic therapy for vesicoureteral reflux: a meta-analysis. I. Reflux resolution and urinary tract infectionJ Urol20061757162210.1016/S0022-5347(05)00210-716407037 – reference: FehrenbakerLGKelalisPPSticklerGBVesicoureteral reflux and ureteral duplication in childrenJ Urol197210786241:STN:280:DyaE387ntVCltA%3D%3D5022560 – reference: Vereecken RL, Proesmans W. Extensive surgery on the trigone for complete ureteral duplication does not cause incontinence or voiding problems. Urology. 2000;55:267-270-271. – reference: VatesTSBukowskiTTriestJFreedmanASmithCPerlmutterAIs there a best alternative to treating the obstructed upper pole?J Urol199615674461:STN:280:DyaK283ovFCgsA%3D%3D10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65803-88683774 – reference: • Figueroa VH, Chavhan GB, Oudjhane K, Farhat W. Utility of MR urography in children suspected of having ectopic ureter. Pediatr Radiol. 2014;44:956–62. This manuscript documents the utility of MRU in diagnosing ectopic duplex urters, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 75–88%. – reference: JohnstonJHJohnsonLMExperiences with ectopic ureterocelesBr J Urol19694161701:STN:280:DyaF1M7js1GgsQ%3D%3D10.1111/j.1464-410X.1969.tb09909.x5774537 – reference: AmbroseSSNicolsonWPUreteral reflux in duplicated uretersJ Urol196492439441:STN:280:DyaF2M%2FjtVyktQ%3D%3D14226469 – reference: MarshallFFMcLoughlinMGLong blind-ending ureteral duplicationsJ Urol197812062681:STN:280:DyaE1M%2FltVOjuw%3D%3D712911 – reference: YouDBangJKShimMRyuDSKimKSAnalysis of the late outcome of laparoscopic heminephrectomy in children with duplex kidneysBJU Int2010106250410.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.09038.x19888983 – reference: BansalDCostNGBeanCMNohPHPediatric laparo-endoscopic single site partial nephrectomy: feasibility in infants and small children for upper urinary tract duplication anomaliesJ Pediatr Urol201410859631:STN:280:DC%2BC2crgvFKlsA%3D%3D10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.01.02524598458 – reference: JayanthiVRKoffSALong-term outcome of transurethral puncture of ectopic ureteroceles: initial success and late problemsJ Urol19991621077801:STN:280:DyaK1MzosFKitQ%3D%3D10.1016/S0022-5347(01)68073-X10458435 – reference: Han MY, Gibbons MD, Belman AB, Pohl HG, Majd M, Rushton HG. Indications for nonoperative management of ureteroceles. J Urol. 2005;174:1652-1655-1656. – reference: LashleyDBMcAleerIMKaplanGWIpsilateral ureteroureterostomy for the treatment of vesicoureteral reflux or obstruction associated with complete ureteral duplicationJ Urol200116555241:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3jt1WntQ%3D%3D10.1097/00005392-200102000-0006711176433 – reference: HaggMJMourachovPVSnyderHMCanningDAKennedyWAZdericSAThe modern endoscopic approach to ureteroceleJ Urol200016394031:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7ltVOgsQ%3D%3D10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67857-310688025 – reference: BissetGSStrifeJLThe duplex collecting system in girls with urinary tract infection: prevalence and significanceAJR Am J Roentgenol198714849750010.2214/ajr.148.3.4973492875 – reference: • Joyeux L, Lacreuse I, Schneider A, Moog R, Borgnon J, Lopez M, et al. Long-term functional renal outcomes after retroperitoneoscopic upper pole heminephrectomy for duplex kidney in children: a multicenter cohort study. Surg Endosc. 2016. This manuscript reports renal outcomes following laparoscopic retroperitoneal heminephrectomy with a mean of 7 years follow-up. They demonstrate renal function loss in four patients (17%), with losses ranging from 6 to 18%. – reference: De CaluweDChertinBPuriPFate of the retained ureteral stump after upper pole heminephrectomy in duplex kidneysJ Urol20021686798010.1016/S0022-5347(05)64722-212131348 – reference: Siomou E, Papadopoulou F, Kollios KD, Photopoulos A, Evagelidou E, Androulakakis P, et al. Duplex collecting system diagnosed during the first 6 years of life after a first urinary tract infection: a study of 63 children. J Urol. 2006;175:678-681-682. – reference: CabezaliDMaruszewskiPLópezFAransayAGomezAComplications and late outcome in transperitoneal laparoscopic heminephrectomy for duplex kidney in childrenJ Endourol201327133810.1089/end.2012.037923005915 – reference: •• Lee NG, Corbett ST, Cobb K, Bailey GC, Burns AS, Peters CA. Bi-institutional comparison of robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open ureteroureterostomy in the pediatric population. J Endourol. 2015;29:1237–41. This important series compares RALUU to open UU, and demonstrates no statistically significant difference in mean operative times or complication rates, with RALUU patients having a 0.5 day shorter hospital stay. – reference: CaldamoneAASnyderHMDuckettJWUreteroceles in children: followup of management with upper tract approachJ Urol1984131113021:STN:280:DyaL2c3hs1Gmsw%3D%3D6726912 – reference: CasalePLambertSRobotic ureteroureterostomy in children with a duplex collecting systemJ Robot Surg2009316110.1007/s11701-009-0153-727638372 – reference: GearhartJGRinkRCMouriquandPDEPediatric urology2009PhiladelphiaElsevier Health Sciences – reference: CampbellMFCampbellMFHarrisonJHAnomalies of the ureterUrology19703PhiladelphiaWB Saunders1487670 – reference: PetersonLJGrimesJHWeinerthJLGlennJFBlind-ending branches of bifid uretersUrology1975519151:STN:280:DyaE2M7gtlKrsw%3D%3D10.1016/0090-4295(75)90008-41114554 – reference: HusmannDARenal dysplasia: the risks and consequences of leaving dysplastic tissue in situUrology19985253361:STN:280:DyaK1cvjsVSgsw%3D%3D10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00289-19763067 – reference: DanglePPAkhavanAOdeleyeMAveryDLendvayTKohCJNinety-day perioperative complications of pediatric robotic urological surgery: a multi-institutional studyJ Pediatr Urol201612102.e161:STN:280:DC%2BC28jisleksQ%3D%3D10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.08.015This large mutli-institutional series documents complications among pediatric robotic procedures, including RALHN and RALUU, demonstrating similar complication rates – reference: HusmannDAEwaltDHGlenskiWJBernierPAUreterocele associated with ureteral duplication and a nonfunctioning upper pole segment: management by partial nephroureterectomy aloneJ Urol199515472361:STN:280:DyaK2Mzjtlequw%3D%3D10.1016/S0022-5347(01)67144-17609163 – reference: NationEFDuplication of the kidney and ureter: a statistical study of 230 new casesJ Urol194451456 – reference: PlaireJCPopeJCKroppBPAdamsMCKeatingMARinkRCManagement of ectopic ureters: experience with the upper tract approachJ Urol1997158124571:STN:280:DyaK2svgt1yjtQ%3D%3D10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64442-29258185 – reference: AfsharKPapanikolaouFMalekRBagliDPippi-SalleJLKhouryAVesicoureteral reflux and complete ureteral duplication. Conservative or surgical management?J Urol20051731725710.1097/01.ju.0000154164.99648.ee15821569 – reference: • Biles MJ, Finkelstein JB, Silva MV, Lambert SM, Casale P. Innovation in robotics and pediatric urology: robotic ureteroureterostomy for duplex systems with ureteral ectopia. J Endourol. 2016;30:1041–8. This publication demonstrates the safety of RALUU, with no complications or reoperations among 12 patients with duplex collecting systems. – reference: UsonACLattimerJKMelicowMMUreteroceles in infants and children: a report based on 44 casesPediatrics196127971831:STN:280:DyaF3c%2FpvFGltA%3D%3D13779382 – reference: Smith FL, Ritchie EL, Maizels M, Zaontz MR, Hsueh W, Kaplan WE, et al. Surgery for duplex kidneys with ectopic ureters: ipsilateral ureteroureterostomy versus polar nephrectomy. J Urol. 1989;142:532-534-543. – reference: GrimsbyGMMerchantZJacobsMAGargolloPCLaparoscopic-assisted ureteroureterostomy for duplication anomalies in childrenJ Endourol2014281173710.1089/end.2014.011325010444 – reference: GonzálezRPiaggioLInitial experience with laparoscopic ipsilateral ureteroureterostomy in infants and children for duplication anomalies of the urinary tractJ Urol20071772315810.1016/j.juro.2007.01.17717509348 – reference: SumfestJMBurnsMWMitchellMEPseudoureterocele: potential for misdiagnosis of an ectopic ureter as a ureteroceleBr J Urol19957540151:STN:280:DyaK2M3ltlOrtA%3D%3D10.1111/j.1464-410X.1995.tb07357.x7735809 – reference: BrockWAKaplanGWEctopic ureteroceles in childrenJ Urol197811980031:STN:280:DyaE1c7pslWntg%3D%3D660767 – reference: JayramGRobertsJHernandezAHelouryYManoharanSGodbolePOutcomes and fate of the remnant moiety following laparoscopic heminephrectomy for duplex kidney: a multicenter reviewJ Pediatr Urol2011727251:STN:280:DC%2BC3MrpsVKguw%3D%3D10.1016/j.jpurol.2011.02.02921527211 – reference: Cooper CS, Passerini-Glazel G, Hutcheson JC, Iafrate M, Camuffo C, Milani C, et al. Long-term followup of endoscopic incision of ureteroceles: intravesical versus extravesical. J Urol. 2000;164:1097-1099-1100. – reference: LeongJMikhaelBSchillingerJFRefluxing ureterocelesJ Urol198012413691:STN:280:DyaL3M%2FgvFOrtw%3D%3D7411702 – reference: StormDWModiAJayanthiVRLaparoscopic ipsilateral ureteroureterostomy in the management of ureteral ectopia in infants and childrenJ Pediatr Urol201175293310.1016/j.jpurol.2010.08.00420869918 – reference: PiaggioLFranc-GuimondJFigueroaTEBartholdJSGonzálezRComparison of laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy for duplication anomalies in childrenJ Urol200617522697310.1016/S0022-5347(06)00342-916697852 – reference: KutikovANguyenMGuzzoTCanterDCasalePLaparoscopic and robotic complex upper-tract reconstruction in children with a duplex collecting systemJ Endourol200721621410.1089/end.2006.022717638558 – reference: LeeYSHahYSKimM-JJungHJLeeM-JImYJFactors associated with complications of the ureteral stump after proximal ureteroureterostomyJ Urol20121881890410.1016/j.juro.2012.07.01522998921 – reference: LevyJBVandersteenDRMorgensternBZHusmannDAHypertension after surgical management of renal duplication associated with an upper pole ureteroceleJ Urol1997158124141:STN:280:DyaK2svgt1yjtA%3D%3D10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64441-09258184 – reference: BolducSUpadhyayJShermanCFarhatWBagliDJMcLorieGAHistology of upper pole is unaffected by prenatal diagnosis in duplex system ureterocelesJ Urol20021681123610.1016/S0022-5347(05)64606-X12187250 – reference: KlauberGTCrawfordDBProlapse of ectopic ureterocele and bladder trigoneUrology19801516461:STN:280:DyaL3c7isFeksA%3D%3D10.1016/0090-4295(80)90412-47355541 – reference: • Mason MD, Anthony Herndon CD, Smith-Harrison LI, Peters CA, Corbett ST. Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy in duplicated collecting systems in the pediatric population: techniques and outcomes. J Pediatr Urol. 2014;10:374–9. This manuscript addresses technical concerns regarding RALUU and demonstrates a low complication rate among 21 patients with duplex collecting systems. – reference: GundetiMSRansleyPGDuffyPGCuckowPMWilcoxDTRenal outcome following heminephrectomy for duplex kidneyJ Urol2005173174341:STN:280:DC%2BD2M7ps1Omtw%3D%3D10.1097/01.ju.0000154163.67420.4d15821573 – reference: DiardFEklöfOLebowitzRMaursethKUrethral obstruction in boys caused by prolapse of simple ureterocelePediatr Radiol198111139421:STN:280:DyaL387gsFWitw%3D%3D10.1007/BF009718157322652 – reference: PerrinEVPerskyLTuckerAChrenkaBRenal duplication and dysplasiaUrology1974466041:STN:280:DyaE2M7itlWhsw%3D%3D10.1016/0090-4295(74)90240-44454103 – reference: GranCDKroppBPChengEYKroppKAPrimary lower urinary tract reconstruction for nonfunctioning renal moieties associated with obstructing ureterocelesJ Urol200517319820110.1097/01.ju.0000148374.64478.b515592074 – volume: 10 start-page: 859 year: 2014 ident: 664_CR40 publication-title: J Pediatr Urol doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.01.025 – volume: 51 start-page: 456 year: 1944 ident: 664_CR3 publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)70379-5 – volume: 124 start-page: 136 year: 1980 ident: 664_CR10 publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)55330-6 – volume: 173 start-page: 198 year: 2005 ident: 664_CR27 publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000148374.64478.b5 – volume: 106 start-page: 250 year: 2010 ident: 664_CR47 publication-title: BJU Int doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.09038.x – volume: 80 start-page: 663 year: 1997 ident: 664_CR23 publication-title: Br J Urol doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410X.1997.00413.x – volume: 4 start-page: 183 year: 2008 ident: 664_CR33 publication-title: J Pediatr Urol doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2007.12.003 – volume: 173 start-page: 1725 year: 2005 ident: 664_CR29 publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000154164.99648.ee – volume: 168 start-page: 1123 year: 2002 ident: 664_CR21 publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64606-X – ident: 664_CR64 doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0645 – volume: 75 start-page: 401 year: 1995 ident: 664_CR14 publication-title: Br J Urol doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1995.tb07357.x – ident: 664_CR59 doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)38806-7 – volume: 4 start-page: 660 year: 1974 ident: 664_CR22 publication-title: Urology doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(74)90240-4 – start-page: 1487 volume-title: Urology year: 1970 ident: 664_CR6 – volume: 131 start-page: 1130 year: 1984 ident: 664_CR12 publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)50842-3 – volume: 7 start-page: 272 year: 2011 ident: 664_CR49 publication-title: J Pediatr Urol doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2011.02.029 – volume: 15 start-page: 164 year: 1980 ident: 664_CR17 publication-title: Urology doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(80)90412-4 – volume: 154 start-page: 723 year: 1995 ident: 664_CR48 publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)67144-1 – volume: 7 start-page: 529 year: 2011 ident: 664_CR56 publication-title: J Pediatr Urol doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2010.08.004 – volume: 52 start-page: 533 year: 1998 ident: 664_CR61 publication-title: Urology doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00289-1 – volume: 85 start-page: 457 year: 2015 ident: 664_CR28 publication-title: Urology doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.10.014 – volume: 175 start-page: 716 year: 2006 ident: 664_CR31 publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00210-7 – volume: 7 start-page: 257 year: 2011 ident: 664_CR58 publication-title: J Pediatr Urol doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2011.03.007 – volume: 176 start-page: 1871 year: 2006 ident: 664_CR36 publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00601-X – volume: 158 start-page: 1245 year: 1997 ident: 664_CR50 publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64442-2 – volume: 11 start-page: 139 year: 1981 ident: 664_CR18 publication-title: Pediatr Radiol doi: 10.1007/BF00971815 – volume: 162 start-page: 1077 year: 1999 ident: 664_CR35 publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)68073-X – volume: 3 start-page: 161 year: 2009 ident: 664_CR55 publication-title: J Robot Surg doi: 10.1007/s11701-009-0153-7 – volume: 41 start-page: 61 year: 1969 ident: 664_CR11 publication-title: Br J Urol doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1969.tb09909.x – volume: 1 start-page: 101 year: 2005 ident: 664_CR43 publication-title: J Pediatr Urol doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2005.01.003 – volume: 177 start-page: 2315 year: 2007 ident: 664_CR65 publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.01.177 – volume: 5 start-page: 191 year: 1975 ident: 664_CR24 publication-title: Urology doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(75)90008-4 – volume: 120 start-page: 626 year: 1978 ident: 664_CR25 publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)57303-6 – volume: 175 start-page: 2269 year: 2006 ident: 664_CR46 publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00342-9 – volume: 148 start-page: 497 year: 1987 ident: 664_CR15 publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol doi: 10.2214/ajr.148.3.497 – volume: 12 start-page: 266.e1 year: 2016 ident: 664_CR41 publication-title: J Pediatr Urol doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.04.021 – volume: 123 start-page: 921 year: 1980 ident: 664_CR8 publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)56194-7 – ident: 664_CR67 doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0223 – volume: 163 start-page: 940 year: 2000 ident: 664_CR13 publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67857-3 – ident: 664_CR34 doi: 10.1097/00005392-200009020-00045 – volume: 21 start-page: 621 year: 2007 ident: 664_CR66 publication-title: J Endourol doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0227 – volume: 26 start-page: 602 year: 2012 ident: 664_CR38 publication-title: J Endourol doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0252 – volume: 168 start-page: 679 year: 2002 ident: 664_CR51 publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64722-2 – ident: 664_CR42 doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0818 – volume: 165 start-page: 552 year: 2001 ident: 664_CR62 publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1097/00005392-200102000-00067 – volume: 3 start-page: 223 year: 2015 ident: 664_CR16 publication-title: Urol Case Rep doi: 10.1016/j.eucr.2015.07.003 – ident: 664_CR2 doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00184-9 – volume: 28 start-page: 1173 year: 2014 ident: 664_CR57 publication-title: J Endourol doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0113 – ident: 664_CR19 doi: 10.1007/s00247-014-2905-4 – volume: 77 start-page: 191 year: 2011 ident: 664_CR32 publication-title: Urology doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.02.061 – volume: 173 start-page: 1743 year: 2005 ident: 664_CR52 publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000154163.67420.4d – ident: 664_CR53 – ident: 664_CR20 doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.610 – volume: 107 start-page: 862 year: 1972 ident: 664_CR4 publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)61160-1 – volume: 27 start-page: 133 year: 2013 ident: 664_CR44 publication-title: J Endourol doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0379 – volume: 188 start-page: 1890 year: 2012 ident: 664_CR45 publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.07.015 – volume: 158 start-page: 1241 year: 1997 ident: 664_CR60 publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64441-0 – ident: 664_CR39 doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2013.10.014 – volume-title: Pediatric urology year: 2009 ident: 664_CR1 – ident: 664_CR30 doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000175943.95989.41 – volume: 26 start-page: 1279 year: 2012 ident: 664_CR63 publication-title: J Endourol doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0041 – ident: 664_CR37 doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.073 – ident: 664_CR26 doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)00429-X – volume: 119 start-page: 800 year: 1978 ident: 664_CR9 publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)57637-5 – volume: 156 start-page: 744 year: 1996 ident: 664_CR54 publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65803-8 – volume: 12 start-page: 102.e1 year: 2016 ident: 664_CR68 publication-title: J Pediatr Urol doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.08.015 – volume: 27 start-page: 971 year: 1961 ident: 664_CR7 publication-title: Pediatrics doi: 10.1542/peds.27.6.971 – volume: 92 start-page: 439 year: 1964 ident: 664_CR5 publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)63983-1 – reference: 9258184 - J Urol. 1997 Sep;158(3 Pt 2):1241-4 – reference: 9258185 - J Urol. 1997 Sep;158(3 Pt 2):1245-7 – reference: 712911 - J Urol. 1978 Nov;120(5):626-8 – reference: 26897324 - J Pediatr Urol. 2016 Apr;12 (2):102.e1-6 – reference: 3492875 - AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987 Mar;148(3):497-500 – reference: 16407023 - J Urol. 2006 Feb;175(2):678-81; discussion 681-2 – reference: 21527238 - J Pediatr Urol. 2011 Jun;7(3):257-60 – reference: 16945677 - J Urol. 2006 Oct;176(4 Pt 2):1871-7; discussion 1877 – reference: 16148674 - J Urol. 2005 Oct;174(4 Pt 2):1652-5; discussion 1655-6 – reference: 26793560 - Urol Case Rep. 2015 Aug 25;3(6):223-5 – reference: 23005915 - J Endourol. 2013 Feb;27(2):133-8 – reference: 16407037 - J Urol. 2006 Feb;175(2):716-22 – reference: 22563798 - J Endourol. 2012 Oct;26(10):1279-83 – reference: 24268881 - J Pediatr Urol. 2014 Apr;10(2):374-9 – reference: 9763067 - Urology. 1998 Oct;52(4):533-6 – reference: 12131348 - J Urol. 2002 Aug;168(2):679-80 – reference: 16697852 - J Urol. 2006 Jun;175(6):2269-73 – reference: 18631922 - J Pediatr Urol. 2008 Jun;4(3):183-7 – reference: 660767 - J Urol. 1978 Jun;119(6):800-3 – reference: 15821573 - J Urol. 2005 May;173(5):1743-4 – reference: 12187250 - J Urol. 2002 Sep;168(3):1123-6 – reference: 15821569 - J Urol. 2005 May;173(5):1725-7 – reference: 21527211 - J Pediatr Urol. 2011 Jun;7(3):272-5 – reference: 13779382 - Pediatrics. 1961 Jun;27:971-83 – reference: 1114554 - Urology. 1975 Feb;5(2):191-5 – reference: 17638558 - J Endourol. 2007 Jun;21(6):621-4 – reference: 7609163 - J Urol. 1995 Aug;154(2 Pt 2):723-6 – reference: 19888983 - BJU Int. 2010 Jul;106(2):250-4 – reference: 4454103 - Urology. 1974 Dec;4(6):660-4 – reference: 22050504 - J Endourol. 2012 Jun;26(6):602-13 – reference: 7355541 - Urology. 1980 Feb;15(2):164-6 – reference: 14226469 - J Urol. 1964 Nov;92:439-44 – reference: 10458435 - J Urol. 1999 Sep;162(3 Pt 2):1077-80 – reference: 27542552 - J Endourol. 2016 Oct;30(10 ):1041-1048 – reference: 27697471 - J Pediatr Urol. 2017 Feb;13(1):56.e1-56.e7 – reference: 10688025 - J Urol. 2000 Mar;163(3):940-3 – reference: 11176433 - J Urol. 2001 Feb;165(2):552-4 – reference: 5022560 - J Urol. 1972 May;107(5):862-4 – reference: 10958751 - J Urol. 2000 Sep;164(3 Pt 2):1097-9; discussion 1099-100 – reference: 5774537 - Br J Urol. 1969 Feb;41(1):61-70 – reference: 6726912 - J Urol. 1984 Jun;131(6):1130-2 – reference: 9352710 - Br J Urol. 1997 Oct;80(4):663-5 – reference: 25623719 - Urology. 2015 Feb;85(2):457-62 – reference: 21168903 - Urology. 2011 Jan;77(1):191-4 – reference: 2746774 - J Urol. 1989 Aug;142(2 Pt 2):532-4; discussion 542-3 – reference: 24598458 - J Pediatr Urol. 2014 Oct;10(5):859-63 – reference: 17509348 - J Urol. 2007 Jun;177(6):2315-8 – reference: 7411702 - J Urol. 1980 Jul;124(1):136-9 – reference: 10688092 - Urology. 2000 Feb;55(2):267-70; discussion 270-1 – reference: 7735809 - Br J Urol. 1995 Mar;75(3):401-5 – reference: 22998921 - J Urol. 2012 Nov;188(5):1890-4 – reference: 20869918 - J Pediatr Urol. 2011 Oct;7(5):529-33 – reference: 18947545 - J Pediatr Urol. 2005 Apr;1(2):101-4 – reference: 27638372 - J Robot Surg. 2009 Oct;3(3):161 – reference: 19110277 - J Urol. 2009 Feb;181(2):823-8; discussion 828-9 – reference: 8683774 - J Urol. 1996 Aug;156(2 Pt 2):744-6 – reference: 7322652 - Pediatr Radiol. 1981;11(3):139-42 – reference: 15592074 - J Urol. 2005 Jan;173(1):198-201 – reference: 25010444 - J Endourol. 2014 Oct;28(10):1173-7 – reference: 27321559 - J Pediatr Urol. 2016 Aug;12 (4):266.e1-6 – reference: 7382011 - J Urol. 1980 Jun;123(6):921-6 |
| SSID | ssj0020084 |
| Score | 2.2378817 |
| SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
| Snippet | Purpose of Review
Ureteral duplication and ectopic upper pole ureters are commonly associated with renal pathology, including vesicoureteral reflux,... Ureteral duplication and ectopic upper pole ureters are commonly associated with renal pathology, including vesicoureteral reflux, obstruction, infection, and... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref springer |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 21 |
| SubjectTerms | Humans Medicine Medicine & Public Health Nephrectomy Nephrology Pediatric Urology (D Weiss Section Editor Topical Collection on Pediatric Urology Ureteral Obstruction - complications Ureteral Obstruction - pathology Ureteral Obstruction - surgery Urologic Surgical Procedures Urology Vesico-Ureteral Reflux - etiology |
| Title | Upper Pole Heminephrectomy Versus Lower Pole Ureteroureterostomy for Ectopic Upper Pole Ureters |
| URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11934-017-0664-0 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28233227 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1872580484 |
| Volume | 18 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3dS8MwED90gvgifju_qOCTUkiTdEkfh0yHOvHBgj6FJk1B0G2s24P_vZe03RQ_wKf24XKFu-vl197dLwBnCbcyMoxg9mNZyK3OQs2tCSMtmeUyKoyn2Bjcd_opv3mKn-o57rLpdm9Kkj5TL4bdEGu4jgnXrtXBm2VYiR2dFAZxSrvzryzHEO9JUqlwcyeiKWX-pOLrZvQNYX6rjvpN52oD1mu0GHQr927Ckh1uweqgrodvg0rHYzsJHkavNug7mhDrfGOmo7f3wP0Jm5XBnTsGrZJIJ673BXX6S-mlELMGPVwwfjHBJ2WVaLkD6VXv8bIf1kcmhIZHZBpSqhlDY0th_QhrUkiEHJQkJKMmo0Ib6dvL8rwQGpFE3tEZywoiLdHcxITtQms4Gtp9CFhSFDwWAr2c8E6Ua5aLPNFxQqwumMzaQBrbKVPzibtjLV7VggnZmVuhuZUztyJtOJ8vGVdkGn8JnzYOURjyro6RDe1oVqpIChpLTD28DXuVp-bq8AuSYY4SbbhoXKfqt7L8_VkH_5I-hDXqY8h1oh1BazqZ2WOEJlN9Aivd6-fb3okPyQ9MuNu5 |
| linkProvider | Springer Nature |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3dS8MwED90gvoifjs_K_ikFNIkXdLHIRtTt-HDCnsLTZqCMLexbg_-9yZpuylTwaf24XKFu-TyS-_uF4C7iGoeKIJM9COJT7VMfEm18gPJiaY8yJSj2Oj1G52YPg_DYdnHnVfV7lVK0kXqVbObwRq2YsKWazXMyyZs2SyjPXHFuLk8ZVmGeEeSipntO2FVKvMnFd83ozWEuZYddZtOex_2SrToNQv3HsCGHh_Cdq_Mhx-BiKdTPfNeJyPtdSxNiLa-UfPJ-4dn_4Qtcq9rr0ErJOKZrX0xOt0jd1IGs3otM2D6prwvygrR_Bjidmvw2PHLKxN8RQM09zGWhBhjc6ZdC2uUcQM5MIpQglWCmVTclZelacakQRJpQyYkyRDXSFIVInICtfFkrM_AI1GW0ZAx4-WINoJUkpSlkQwjpGVGeFIHVNlOqJJP3F5rMRIrJmRrbmHMLay5BarD_XLItCDT-Ev4tnKIMFPe5jGSsZ4schFwhkNuQg-tw2nhqaU6c4IkJkaxOjxUrhPlqsx__9b5v6RvYKcz6HVF96n_cgG72M0nW5V2CbX5bKGvDEyZy2s3LT8BvWvdCA |
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LT8MwDLZgkxAX3o_xLBInUFnapEt6RLAxnuLAJDiFJk0lBHTV2h3g15P0sfGWEKf24Lht7DpObH8G2PWJYo7ESFs_HNhEicAWREnbEQwrwpxI5hAbl1etbo-c3Xq3ZZ_TtMp2r0KSRU2DQWmKs2YSRs1x4Zv2O0z2hEndaumbSagT00KiBvXDk7vz9mjPZfDic8hUl5oqFFoFNr9j8nFp-uJvfomV5ktQZxbuq5cvMk8eD4aZOJCvn3Ad__F1czBTuqfWYaFP8zCh4gWYuiwD8IvAe0miBtZ1_0lZXYNLoowyyKz__GKZo7dhal2YvmsFRW9gkm00z_yS5lTaSbbaekDyIK13zArSdAl6nfbNUdcuezTYkjgos11XYKyly6jKa2b9iGkfx0U-ClwZuFRIluezhWFEhXZdwpYIcBAhppAg0kN4GWpxP1arYGE_iohHqVYrn7ScUOCQhr7wfKREhFnQAFSJh8sSwNz00XjiY-hlM3FcTxw3E8dRA_ZGQ5ICveM34p1K5lz_YyZwEsSqP0y5w6jrMW3rSANWCmUYsdNbVqyNIm3AfiVYXpqB9Odnrf2Jehumro87_OL06nwdpt1cMUwW3AbUssFQbWq3KBNbpeq_AZYLArw |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Upper+Pole+Heminephrectomy+Versus+Lower+Pole+Ureteroureterostomy+for+Ectopic+Upper+Pole+Ureters&rft.jtitle=Current+urology+reports&rft.au=Michaud%2C+Jason+E&rft.au=Akhavan%2C+Ardavan&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.eissn=1534-6285&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=21&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs11934-017-0664-0&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F28233227&rft.externalDocID=28233227 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1527-2737&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1527-2737&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1527-2737&client=summon |