Mapping-Based Dosage of Gait Modification Selection for Multi-Parameter, Subject-Specific Gait Retraining

Gait retraining to reduce knee loading has been proposed as a conservative treatment option for early-stage knee osteoarthritis. Mounting evidence suggests that a subject-specific approach may be most effective for ensuring consistent knee loading reductions across all individuals within a populatio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE access Vol. 8; pp. 106354 - 106363
Main Authors Xu, Junkai, Cao, Fangyuan, Zhan, Shi, Ling, Ming, Hu, Hai, Shull, Peter B.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Piscataway IEEE 2020
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2169-3536
2169-3536
DOI10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2999473

Cover

More Information
Summary:Gait retraining to reduce knee loading has been proposed as a conservative treatment option for early-stage knee osteoarthritis. Mounting evidence suggests that a subject-specific approach may be most effective for ensuring consistent knee loading reductions across all individuals within a population. However, it is currently unclear how to determine the required gait modification dosage selection type and amount to both reduce knee loading and satisfy individual preferences. To overcome this challenge, we introduce a novel, mapping-based dosage selection approach to systematically determine multi-parameter gait modifications to reduce knee loading while maintaining individual user preference. In this approach, individuals first explore different dosages of multi-parameter gait modifications, and then a resulting visual map is displayed with a subject-specific dosage selection zone for the target knee loading reduction. Subjects then self-select a preferred gait within their dosage selection zone. To evaluate the feasibility of this approach, fifteen healthy subjects and one knee OA patient performed walking trials on a treadmill involving various dosages of gait modifications to foot progression angle and step width. Subjects quickly selected the subject-specific gait modifications via mapping-based dosage selection during a single 6 min trial, which reduced the knee adduction moment by an average of 14.2%. Resulting subject-specific gait modifications varied, with 6 subjects selecting only toe-in, 5 subjects selecting both toe-in and increased step width, 2 subjects selecting only toe-out, 1 subject selecting both toe-out and increased step width and 1 subject selecting only increased step width. Average perceived exertion was "fairly light" (index was 10.5±2.2). The knee OA patient selected only toe-in and reduced the knee adduction moment by 12.8%. The presented mapping-based dosage selection approach could provide a systematic and practical means to determine subject-specific gait modifications while maintaining individual preferences.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:2169-3536
2169-3536
DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2999473