Reproductive Outcomes in Women with Prior Cesarean Section Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization:A Retrospective Case-control Study
The impact of prior cesarean section(CS) on the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer(IVF-ET) was investigated. A retrospective analysis was performed on 144 patients with prior CS between January 2013 and December 2015. The pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal o...
Saved in:
Published in | Current medical science Vol. 37; no. 6; pp. 922 - 927 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Wuhan
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
01.12.2017
Hubei Clinic Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Embryonic Development,Wuhan 430060,China Reproductive Medical Center,Renmin Hospital,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430060,China |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1672-0733 2096-5230 1993-1352 1993-1352 2523-899X |
DOI | 10.1007/s11596-017-1828-3 |
Cover
Abstract | The impact of prior cesarean section(CS) on the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer(IVF-ET) was investigated. A retrospective analysis was performed on 144 patients with prior CS between January 2013 and December 2015. The pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcomes of patients who had previous CS delivery and received IVF-ET were analyzed. The control group comprised 166 patients who had only previous vaginal delivery(VD) and received IVF-ET during the same period. The results showed that the basal follicle stimulating hormone level, estradiol level on human chorionic gonadotropin(h CG) day, gonadotrophin dosage, duration of stimulation, retrieved oocytes, fertilization rate, high-quality embryo rate, multiple birth rate, abortion rate and ectopic pregnancy rate had no significant difference between the two groups(P〉0.05). The pregnancy rate(40.28% vs. 54.22%) and implantation rate(24.01% vs. 34.67%) were significantly lower(P〈0.05), and the ratio of embryo difficulty transfer(9/144 vs. 0/166) was significantly higher in CS group than in VD group. The risk of pernicious placenta previa and postpartum hemorrhage in twin deliveries was significantly increased in CS group as compared with that in VD group(P〈0.05), and gestational age and neonatal birth weight were significantly reduced in twin deliveries as compared with singleton deliveries in both groups(P〈0.05). It was suggested that the existence of CS scar may impact embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy outcome, and increase the difficulty of ET. We should limit the number of transfer embryos to avoid multiple pregnancies and strengthen gestational supervision in patients with cesarean scar. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The impact of prior cesarean section (CS) on the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) was investigated. A retrospective analysis was performed on 144 patients with prior CS between January 2013 and December 2015. The pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcomes of patients who had previous CS delivery and received IVF-ET were analyzed. The control group comprised 166 patients who had only previous vaginal delivery (VD) and received IVF-ET during the same period. The results showed that the basal follicle stimulating hormone level, estradiol level on human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) day, gonadotrophin dosage, duration of stimulation, retrieved oocytes, fertilization rate, high-quality embryo rate, multiple birth rate, abortion rate and ectopic pregnancy rate had no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The pregnancy rate (40.28% vs. 54.22%) and implantation rate (24.01% vs. 34.67%) were significantly lower (P<0.05), and the ratio of embryo difficulty transfer (9/144 vs. 0/166) was significantly higher in CS group than in VD group. The risk of pernicious placenta previa and postpartum hemorrhage in twin deliveries was significantly increased in CS group as compared with that in VD group (P<0.05), and gestational age and neonatal birth weight were significantly reduced in twin deliveries as compared with singleton deliveries in both groups (P<0.05). It was suggested that the existence of CS scar may impact embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy outcome, and increase the difficulty of ET. We should limit the number of transfer embryos to avoid multiple pregnancies and strengthen gestational supervision in patients with cesarean scar. Summary The impact of prior cesarean section (CS) on the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) was investigated. A retrospective analysis was performed on 144 patients with prior CS between January 2013 and December 2015. The pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcomes of patients who had previous CS delivery and received IVF-ET were analyzed. The control group comprised 166 patients who had only previous vaginal delivery (VD) and received IVF-ET during the same period. The results showed that the basal follicle stimulating hormone level, estradiol level on human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) day, gonadotrophin dosage, duration of stimulation, retrieved oocytes, fertilization rate, high-quality embryo rate, multiple birth rate, abortion rate and ectopic pregnancy rate had no significant difference between the two groups ( P >0.05). The pregnancy rate (40.28% vs. 54.22%) and implantation rate (24.01% vs. 34.67%) were significantly lower ( P <0.05), and the ratio of embryo difficulty transfer (9/144 vs. 0/166) was significantly higher in CS group than in VD group. The risk of pernicious placenta previa and postpartum hemorrhage in twin deliveries was significantly increased in CS group as compared with that in VD group ( P <0.05), and gestational age and neonatal birth weight were significantly reduced in twin deliveries as compared with singleton deliveries in both groups ( P <0.05). It was suggested that the existence of CS scar may impact embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy outcome, and increase the difficulty of ET. We should limit the number of transfer embryos to avoid multiple pregnancies and strengthen gestational supervision in patients with cesarean scar. The impact of prior cesarean section(CS) on the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer(IVF-ET) was investigated. A retrospective analysis was performed on 144 patients with prior CS between January 2013 and December 2015. The pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcomes of patients who had previous CS delivery and received IVF-ET were analyzed. The control group comprised 166 patients who had only previous vaginal delivery(VD) and received IVF-ET during the same period. The results showed that the basal follicle stimulating hormone level, estradiol level on human chorionic gonadotropin(h CG) day, gonadotrophin dosage, duration of stimulation, retrieved oocytes, fertilization rate, high-quality embryo rate, multiple birth rate, abortion rate and ectopic pregnancy rate had no significant difference between the two groups(P〉0.05). The pregnancy rate(40.28% vs. 54.22%) and implantation rate(24.01% vs. 34.67%) were significantly lower(P〈0.05), and the ratio of embryo difficulty transfer(9/144 vs. 0/166) was significantly higher in CS group than in VD group. The risk of pernicious placenta previa and postpartum hemorrhage in twin deliveries was significantly increased in CS group as compared with that in VD group(P〈0.05), and gestational age and neonatal birth weight were significantly reduced in twin deliveries as compared with singleton deliveries in both groups(P〈0.05). It was suggested that the existence of CS scar may impact embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy outcome, and increase the difficulty of ET. We should limit the number of transfer embryos to avoid multiple pregnancies and strengthen gestational supervision in patients with cesarean scar. The impact of prior cesarean section (CS) on the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) was investigated. A retrospective analysis was performed on 144 patients with prior CS between January 2013 and December 2015. The pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcomes of patients who had previous CS delivery and received IVF-ET were analyzed. The control group comprised 166 patients who had only previous vaginal delivery (VD) and received IVF-ET during the same period. The results showed that the basal follicle stimulating hormone level, estradiol level on human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) day, gonadotrophin dosage, duration of stimulation, retrieved oocytes, fertilization rate, high-quality embryo rate, multiple birth rate, abortion rate and ectopic pregnancy rate had no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The pregnancy rate (40.28% vs. 54.22%) and implantation rate (24.01% vs. 34.67%) were significantly lower (P<0.05), and the ratio of embryo difficulty transfer (9/144 vs. 0/166) was significantly higher in CS group than in VD group. The risk of pernicious placenta previa and postpartum hemorrhage in twin deliveries was significantly increased in CS group as compared with that in VD group (P<0.05), and gestational age and neonatal birth weight were significantly reduced in twin deliveries as compared with singleton deliveries in both groups (P<0.05). It was suggested that the existence of CS scar may impact embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy outcome, and increase the difficulty of ET. We should limit the number of transfer embryos to avoid multiple pregnancies and strengthen gestational supervision in patients with cesarean scar.The impact of prior cesarean section (CS) on the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) was investigated. A retrospective analysis was performed on 144 patients with prior CS between January 2013 and December 2015. The pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcomes of patients who had previous CS delivery and received IVF-ET were analyzed. The control group comprised 166 patients who had only previous vaginal delivery (VD) and received IVF-ET during the same period. The results showed that the basal follicle stimulating hormone level, estradiol level on human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) day, gonadotrophin dosage, duration of stimulation, retrieved oocytes, fertilization rate, high-quality embryo rate, multiple birth rate, abortion rate and ectopic pregnancy rate had no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The pregnancy rate (40.28% vs. 54.22%) and implantation rate (24.01% vs. 34.67%) were significantly lower (P<0.05), and the ratio of embryo difficulty transfer (9/144 vs. 0/166) was significantly higher in CS group than in VD group. The risk of pernicious placenta previa and postpartum hemorrhage in twin deliveries was significantly increased in CS group as compared with that in VD group (P<0.05), and gestational age and neonatal birth weight were significantly reduced in twin deliveries as compared with singleton deliveries in both groups (P<0.05). It was suggested that the existence of CS scar may impact embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy outcome, and increase the difficulty of ET. We should limit the number of transfer embryos to avoid multiple pregnancies and strengthen gestational supervision in patients with cesarean scar. The impact of prior cesarean section (CS) on the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) was investigated.A retrospective analysis was performed on 144 patients with prior CS between January 2013 and December 2015.The pregnancy,delivery,and neonatal outcomes of patients who had previous CS delivery and received IVF-ET were analyzed.The control group comprised 166 patients who had only previous vaginal delivery (VD) and received IVF-ET during the same period.The results showed that the basal follicle stimulating hormone level,estradiol level on human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) day,gonadotrophin dosage,duration of stimulation,retrieved oocytes,fertilization rate,high-quality embryo rate,multiple birth rate,abortion rate and ectopic pregnancy rate had no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05).The pregnancy rate (40.28% vs.54.22%) and implantation rate (24.01% vs.34.67%) were significantly lower (P<0.05),and the ratio of embryo difficulty transfer (9/144 vs.0/166) was significantly higher in CS group than in VD group.The risk of pernicious placenta previa and postpartum hemorrhage in twin deliveries was significantly increased in CS group as compared with that in VD group (P<0.05),and gestational age and neonatal birth weight were significantly reduced in twin deliveries as compared with singleton deliveries in both groups (P<0.05).It was suggested that the existence of CS scar may impact embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy outcome,and increase the difficulty of ET.We should limit the number of transfer embryos to avoid multiple pregnancies and strengthen gestational supervision in patients with cesarean scar. |
Author | 王雅琴;尹太郎;徐望明;漆倩荣;王笑臣;杨菁 |
AuthorAffiliation | Reproductive Medical Center, Renmin Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China;Hubei Clinic Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Embryonic Development, Wuhan 430060, China |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: Reproductive Medical Center,Renmin Hospital,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430060,China;Hubei Clinic Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Embryonic Development,Wuhan 430060,China |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: 王雅琴;尹太郎;徐望明;漆倩荣;王笑臣;杨菁 |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29270754$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kUtuFDEURUsoiHxgAUyQxQgJFfhX_gyjVkIiRQpKCAwtV9nVcVNtd2wXSWfGNlgLe2ILuKkOSAwysPz0dO679n371Y4P3lbVSwTfIQj5-4RQI1kNEa-RwKImT6o9JCWpEWnwTqkZxzXkhOxW-yktIGw4w_RZtYsl5pA3dK_6fmFXMZixy-6bBedj7sLSJuA8-FIKD25dvgYfowsRzGzS0WoPLm2hgwdX3tg4D87PwakHn12OARzbmN3g7vWG-PXzxyG4sKWfVnZymOlk6y740hvAZR7N-nn1tNdDsi-290F1dXz0aXZSn51_OJ0dntUdhTzXDHYN5oJSQhHCmlKJETStaZHkkkhqRNejcoiBoulFazSCHTOEtZTBXhhyUL2d5t5q32s_V4swRl8cVV6sv5q7u1ZZXKKEDCJZ6DcTXdK5GW3KaulSZ4dBexvGpDaukgksUUFfbdGxXVqjVtEtdVyrh5ALwCegK0GkaHvVufwnoBy1GxSCarNONa1TlTeozToVKUr0n_Jh-GMaPGlSYf3cxn8ffUz0emt0Hfz8puj-OjFOiWgYEuQ35Fa_RA |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1080_14647273_2019_1696990 crossref_primary_10_3389_fendo_2022_851213 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00404_022_06436_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejogrb_2022_02_016 crossref_primary_10_12688_f1000research_160214_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10815_022_02627_5 crossref_primary_10_3892_etm_2024_12572 crossref_primary_10_3389_fendo_2022_813791 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jogoh_2023_102692 crossref_primary_10_52054_FVVO_14_1_003 |
Cites_doi | 10.1002/uog.11133 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.11.023 10.1055/s-0032-1304829 10.12659/MSM.893333 10.1055/s-0031-1285829 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.02.019 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182878b43 10.1093/humrep/det110 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.02.018 10.1002/uog.6405 10.3109/01443615.2013.816663 10.1016/0002-9378(70)90606-X 10.1002/uog.7714 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.045 10.1097/01.AOG.0000206182.63788.80 10.1067/mob.2002.127138 10.1007/s10396-015-0678-5 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318273695b 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.03.023 10.1097/00004347-199501000-00004 10.7863/jum.1999.18.1.13 10.3109/14767058.2013.765854 10.1002/uog.5200 10.1186/s12884-015-0609-x 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61870-5 10.1053/j.semperi.2010.03.005 10.12659/MSM.900581 10.1371/journal.pone.0148343 10.1097/01.gco.0000169104.85128.0e 10.1002/uog.16974 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Huazhong University of Science and Technology 2017 Copyright © Wanfang Data Co. Ltd. All Rights Reserved. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Huazhong University of Science and Technology 2017 – notice: Copyright © Wanfang Data Co. Ltd. All Rights Reserved. |
DBID | 2RA 92L CQIGP W91 ~WA AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 2B. 4A8 92I 93N PSX TCJ |
DOI | 10.1007/s11596-017-1828-3 |
DatabaseName | 维普期刊资源整合服务平台 中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点 维普中文期刊数据库 中文科技期刊数据库-医药卫生 中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点 CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic Wanfang Data Journals - Hong Kong WANFANG Data Centre Wanfang Data Journals 万方数据期刊 - 香港版 China Online Journals (COJ) China Online Journals (COJ) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
DocumentTitleAlternate | Reproductive Outcomes in Women with Prior Cesarean Section Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization:A Retrospective Case-control Study |
EISSN | 1993-1352 2523-899X |
EndPage | 927 |
ExternalDocumentID | tjykdxxb_e201706019 29270754 10_1007_s11596_017_1828_3 674385618 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | -5E -5G -BR -Y2 -~C .86 .VR 06C 06D 0R~ 0VY 1N0 29K 29~ 2B. 2C~ 2J2 2KG 2KM 2LR 2RA 2~H 30V 4.4 408 40D 40E 53G 5GY 5VS 6NX 8TC 8UJ 92F 92I 92L 95- 95. 95~ 96X AAAVM AABHQ AAJKR AANXM AARHV AARTL AAYIU AAYQN AAYTO ABFTV ABJNI ABJOX ABKCH ABMNI ABNWP ABQBU ABTMW ACGFS ACHXU ACKNC ACOMO ACSNA ACUDM ADHIR ADINQ ADKPE ADURQ ADYFF ADZKW AEBTG AEGNC AEJHL AEKMD AEOHA AEPYU AETLH AEXYK AFWTZ AFZKB AGAYW AGDGC AGQMX AGWIL AGWZB AGYKE AHAVH AHBYD AHKAY AHYZX AIIXL AJBLW AJRNO ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALWAN AMKLP ARMRJ AZFZN B-. BA0 BGNMA CAG CCEZO CHBEP CIEJG COF CQIGP CS3 CSCUP CW9 D-I DPUIP EBS EJD ESBYG FA0 FEDTE FNLPD FRRFC FWDCC G-Y G-Z GGCAI GGRSB GJIRD GQ6 GQ7 HF~ HG6 HMJXF HRMNR HVGLF HZ~ IJ- IXD I~X I~Z J-C JBSCW JUIAU KOV M4Y MA- N2Q NDZJH NQJWS NU0 O9- O93 O9I O9J P9S PF0 QOR QOS R-E R89 R9I RIG ROL RPX RSV S.. S16 S1Z S27 S37 S3B SAP SCL SDH SHX SMD SNE SNX SOJ SPISZ SZ9 SZN T13 TCJ TSG TT1 TUC U2A U9L UG4 VC2 W48 W91 WK8 Z7U Z82 Z8V ZOVNA ~A9 ~WA -05 -0E -EM -SE -S~ 2JN 2JY 406 5VR 92M 9D9 9DE AACDK AAHNG AAIAL AAJBT AANZL AASML AATNV AAUYE AAXDM AAYZH ABAKF ABDZT ABECU ABHQN ABKZE ABMQK ABSXP ABTEG ABTKH ABWNU ABXPI ACAOD ACDTI ACHSB ACMDZ ACMLO ACOKC ACZOJ ADKNI ADRFC ADTPH AEFQL AEJRE AEMSY AESKC AEVLU AFBBN AFLOW AFQWF AFUIB AGJBK AGMZJ AGQEE AGRTI AHSBF AIAKS AIGIU AILAN AITGF AMXSW AMYLF AMYQR AOCGG AXYYD BDATZ CAJEE DDRTE DNIVK EBLON EIOEI FERAY FFXSO FIGPU FINBP FSGXE GNWQR GRRUI IKXTQ IWAJR JZLTJ LLZTM NPVJJ PT4 Q-- RHV RT5 SCLPG SDE SISQX SJYHP SNPRN SOHCF SRMVM SSLCW STPWE T8U TGQ U1F U1G U5E U5O UOJIU UTJUX UZXMN VFIZW YLTOR Z87 ZMTXR AAPKM AAYXX ABBRH ABDBE ABFSG ABRTQ ACSTC AEZWR AFDZB AFHIU AFOHR AHPBZ AHWEU AIXLP ATHPR AYFIA CITATION ABQSL ADHKG AGQPQ H13 NPM 7X8 4A8 93N PSX |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-60c52784434112a449210dbdb1979394d8cf18cf3d085f8bda10c6d36b460f8d3 |
ISSN | 1672-0733 2096-5230 1993-1352 |
IngestDate | Thu May 29 04:06:48 EDT 2025 Fri Sep 05 05:03:13 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:41:45 EDT 2025 Wed Oct 01 04:53:50 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:07:21 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 21 02:37:18 EST 2025 Wed Feb 14 09:55:45 EST 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 6 |
Keywords | fertilization and embryo transfer cesarean section complication pregnancy in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c407t-60c52784434112a449210dbdb1979394d8cf18cf3d085f8bda10c6d36b460f8d3 |
Notes | The impact of prior cesarean section(CS) on the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer(IVF-ET) was investigated. A retrospective analysis was performed on 144 patients with prior CS between January 2013 and December 2015. The pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcomes of patients who had previous CS delivery and received IVF-ET were analyzed. The control group comprised 166 patients who had only previous vaginal delivery(VD) and received IVF-ET during the same period. The results showed that the basal follicle stimulating hormone level, estradiol level on human chorionic gonadotropin(h CG) day, gonadotrophin dosage, duration of stimulation, retrieved oocytes, fertilization rate, high-quality embryo rate, multiple birth rate, abortion rate and ectopic pregnancy rate had no significant difference between the two groups(P〉0.05). The pregnancy rate(40.28% vs. 54.22%) and implantation rate(24.01% vs. 34.67%) were significantly lower(P〈0.05), and the ratio of embryo difficulty transfer(9/144 vs. 0/166) was significantly higher in CS group than in VD group. The risk of pernicious placenta previa and postpartum hemorrhage in twin deliveries was significantly increased in CS group as compared with that in VD group(P〈0.05), and gestational age and neonatal birth weight were significantly reduced in twin deliveries as compared with singleton deliveries in both groups(P〈0.05). It was suggested that the existence of CS scar may impact embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy outcome, and increase the difficulty of ET. We should limit the number of transfer embryos to avoid multiple pregnancies and strengthen gestational supervision in patients with cesarean scar. Ya-qin WANG Tai-lang YIN , Wang-min XU , Qian-rong QI Xiao-chen WANG , Jing YANG ( 1Reproductive Medical Center, Renmin Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China 2Hubei Clinic Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Embryonic Development, Wuhan 430060, China) 42-1679/R cesarean section in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer pregnancy complication ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
PMID | 29270754 |
PQID | 1979968291 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 6 |
ParticipantIDs | wanfang_journals_tjykdxxb_e201706019 proquest_miscellaneous_1979968291 pubmed_primary_29270754 crossref_citationtrail_10_1007_s11596_017_1828_3 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11596_017_1828_3 springer_journals_10_1007_s11596_017_1828_3 chongqing_primary_674385618 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2017-12-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2017-12-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2017 text: 2017-12-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Wuhan |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Wuhan – name: China |
PublicationTitle | Current medical science |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | CURR MED SCI |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Journal of Zuazhong University of Science and Technology: Medical Edition |
PublicationTitle_FL | Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Medical Science) |
PublicationYear | 2017 |
Publisher | Huazhong University of Science and Technology Hubei Clinic Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Embryonic Development,Wuhan 430060,China Reproductive Medical Center,Renmin Hospital,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430060,China |
Publisher_xml | – name: Huazhong University of Science and Technology – name: Reproductive Medical Center,Renmin Hospital,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430060,China – name: Hubei Clinic Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Embryonic Development,Wuhan 430060,China |
References | Armstrong, Hansen, van Voorhis (CR19) 2003; 101 Sazonova, Kallen, Thurin-Kjellberg (CR23) 2013; 99 Okumura, Francisco, Kondo (CR33) 2016; 48 Bulletti, De Ziegler (CR15) 2005; 17 Ryo, Sakurai, Kamata (CR22) 2016; 43 Nguyen (CR28) 1992; 37 Morris (CR12) 1995; 14 Naji, Daemen, Smith (CR14) 2012; 40 Schemann, Patterson, Nippita (CR1) 2015; 15 Thurmond, Harvey, Smith (CR20) 1999; 18 Naji, Wynants, Smith (CR5) 2013; 28 Brosens, Gellersen (CR16) 2010; 36 Yazicioglu, Gokdogan, Kelekci (CR9) 2006; 124 Gilliam, Rosenberg, Davis (CR30) 2002; 99 Patounakis, Ozcan, Chason (CR21) 2016; 106 Marjolein Bij de Vaate, Linskens, van der Voet (CR25) 2015; 188 Gyamfi-Bannerman, Gilbert, Landon (CR31) 2012; 120 Bujold, Mehta, Bujold (CR29) 2002; 187 Allornuvor, Xue, Zhu (CR18) 2013; 33 Wojdecki, Grynsztajn (CR11) 1970; 107 Getahun, Oyelese, Salihu (CR24) 2006; 107 Lumbiganon, Laopaiboon, Gulmezoglu (CR13) 2010; 375 Landon (CR10) 2010; 34 Miller, Hahn, Grobman (CR3) 2013; 121 Ben-Nagi, Walker, Jurkovic (CR6) 2009; 106 Kessous, Sheiner (CR27) 2013; 26 Betrán, Ye, Moller (CR2) 2016; 11 Wang, Chiu, Lee (CR8) 2009; 34 Gregory, Jackson, Korst (CR4) 2012; 29 Zhang, Chen, Xu (CR7) 2016; 22 Ofili-Yebovi, Ben-Nagi, Sawyer (CR17) 2008; 31 Kaplanoglu, Bulbul, Kaplanoglu (CR32) 2015; 21 Roberge, Boutin, Chaillet (CR26) 2012; 29 M Kaplanoglu (1828_CR32) 2015; 21 C Bulletti (1828_CR15) 2005; 17 GF Allornuvor (1828_CR18) 2013; 33 M Okumura (1828_CR33) 2016; 48 D Getahun (1828_CR24) 2006; 107 AP Betrán (1828_CR2) 2016; 11 O Naji (1828_CR14) 2012; 40 K Schemann (1828_CR1) 2015; 15 CB Wang (1828_CR8) 2009; 34 J Ben-Nagi (1828_CR6) 2009; 106 E Ryo (1828_CR22) 2016; 43 A Sazonova (1828_CR23) 2013; 99 M Gilliam (1828_CR30) 2002; 99 O Naji (1828_CR5) 2013; 28 P Lumbiganon (1828_CR13) 2010; 375 V Armstrong (1828_CR19) 2003; 101 E Bujold (1828_CR29) 2002; 187 JJ Brosens (1828_CR16) 2010; 36 AJ Marjolein Bij de Vaate (1828_CR25) 2015; 188 TV Nguyen (1828_CR28) 1992; 37 J Wojdecki (1828_CR11) 1970; 107 AS Thurmond (1828_CR20) 1999; 18 S Roberge (1828_CR26) 2012; 29 MB Landon (1828_CR10) 2010; 34 R Kessous (1828_CR27) 2013; 26 C Gyamfi-Bannerman (1828_CR31) 2012; 120 G Patounakis (1828_CR21) 2016; 106 KD Gregory (1828_CR4) 2012; 29 F Yazicioglu (1828_CR9) 2006; 124 H Morris (1828_CR12) 1995; 14 D Ofili-Yebovi (1828_CR17) 2008; 31 ES Miller (1828_CR3) 2013; 121 NY Zhang (1828_CR7) 2016; 22 |
References_xml | – volume: 40 start-page: 557 issue: 5 year: 2012 end-page: 561 ident: CR14 article-title: Does the presence of a cesarean section scar influence the site of placental implantation and subsequent migration in future pregnancies: a prospective case-control study publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1002/uog.11133 – volume: 99 start-page: 731 issue: 3 year: 2013 end-page: 737 ident: CR23 article-title: Neonatal and maternal outcomes comparing women undergoing two fertilization (IVF) singleton pregnancies and women undergoing one IVF twin pregnancy publication-title: Fertil Steril doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.11.023 – volume: 29 start-page: 465 issue: 6 year: 2012 end-page: 471 ident: CR26 article-title: Systematic review of cesarean scar assessment in the nonpregnant state: imaging techniques and uterine scar defect publication-title: Am J Perinatol doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1304829 – volume: 21 start-page: 1447 year: 2015 end-page: 1453 ident: CR32 article-title: Effect of multiple repeat cesarean sections on maternal morbidity: data from southeast Turkey publication-title: Med Sci Monit doi: 10.12659/MSM.893333 – volume: 29 start-page: 7 issue: 1 year: 2012 end-page: 18 ident: CR4 article-title: Cesarean versus vaginal delivery: whose risks? Whose benefits publication-title: Am J Perinatol doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1285829 – volume: 106 start-page: 30 issue: 1 year: 2009 end-page: 34 ident: CR6 article-title: Effect of cesarean delivery on the endometrium publication-title: Int J Gynaecol Obstet doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.02.019 – volume: 121 start-page: 789 issue: 4 year: 2013 end-page: 797 ident: CR3 article-title: Consequences of a primary elective cesarean delivery across the reproductive life publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182878b43 – volume: 28 start-page: 1489 issue: 6 year: 2013 end-page: 1496 ident: CR5 article-title: Does the presence of a caesarean section scar affect implantation site and early pregnancy outcome in women attending an early pregnancy assessment unit? publication-title: Hum Reprod doi: 10.1093/humrep/det110 – volume: 188 start-page: 39 year: 2015 end-page: 44 ident: CR25 article-title: Reproducibility of three-dimensional ultrasound for the measurement of a niche in a caesarean scar and assessment of its shape publication-title: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.02.018 – volume: 34 start-page: 85 issue: 1 year: 2009 end-page: 89 ident: CR8 article-title: Ceasarean scar defect: correlation between cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position publication-title: Ultrasound Obstetric Gynecol doi: 10.1002/uog.6405 – volume: 33 start-page: 759 issue: 8 year: 2013 end-page: 763 ident: CR18 article-title: The definition, aetiology, presentation, diagnosis and management of previous caesarean scardefects publication-title: J Obstet Gynaecol doi: 10.3109/01443615.2013.816663 – volume: 107 start-page: 322 issue: 2 year: 1970 end-page: 324 ident: CR11 article-title: Scar formation in the uterus after cesarean section publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(70)90606-X – volume: 36 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2010 end-page: 5 ident: CR16 article-title: Something new about early pregnancy: decidual biosensoring and natural embryo selection publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1002/uog.7714 – volume: 106 start-page: 311 issue: 2 year: 2016 end-page: 316 ident: CR21 article-title: Impact of a prior cesarean delivery on embryo transfer: a prospective study publication-title: Fertil Steril doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.045 – volume: 107 start-page: 771 issue: 4 year: 2006 end-page: 778 ident: CR24 article-title: Previous cesarean delivery and risks of placenta previa and placental abruption publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000206182.63788.80 – volume: 48 start-page: 323 issue: Suppl1 year: 2016 ident: CR33 article-title: EP14.03: Ultrasound diagnosis and evaluation of the number of prior caesarean deliveries as risk factor for placenta accreta in placenta previa cases publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol – volume: 187 start-page: 1199 issue: 5 year: 2002 end-page: 1202 ident: CR29 article-title: Interdelivery interval and uterine rupture publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.127138 – volume: 99 start-page: 976 issue: 6 year: 2002 end-page: 980 ident: CR30 article-title: The likelihood of placenta previa with greater number of cesarean deliveries and higher parit publication-title: Obstet Gynecol – volume: 43 start-page: 237 issue: 2 year: 2016 end-page: 242 ident: CR22 article-title: Changes in uterine flexion caused by cesarean section: correlation between post-flexion and deficient cesarean section scars publication-title: J Med Ultrason (2001) doi: 10.1007/s10396-015-0678-5 – volume: 120 start-page: 1332 issue: 6 year: 2012 end-page: 1337 ident: CR31 article-title: Risk of uterine rupture and placenta accreta with prior uterine surgery outside of the lower segment publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318273695b – volume: 124 start-page: 32 issue: 1 year: 2006 end-page: 36 ident: CR9 article-title: Incomplete healing of the uterine incision after caesarean section: Is it preventable publication-title: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.03.023 – volume: 14 start-page: 16 issue: 1 year: 1995 end-page: 20 ident: CR12 article-title: Surgical pathology of the lower uterine segment caesarean section scar: is the scar a source of clinical symptoms publication-title: Int J Gynecol Pathol doi: 10.1097/00004347-199501000-00004 – volume: 18 start-page: 13 issue: 1 year: 1999 end-page: 16 ident: CR20 article-title: Cesarean section scar as a cause of abnormal vaginal bleeding: diagnosis by sonohysterography publication-title: J Ultrasound Med doi: 10.7863/jum.1999.18.1.13 – volume: 37 start-page: 880 issue: 10 year: 1992 end-page: 882 ident: CR28 article-title: Vaginal birth after cesarean section at the University of Texas publication-title: J Repord Med Gynecol – volume: 26 start-page: 1003 issue: 10 year: 2013 end-page: 1006 ident: CR27 article-title: Is there an association between short interval from previous cesarean section and adverse obstetric and perinatal outcome? publication-title: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.765854 – volume: 31 start-page: 72 issue: 1 year: 2008 end-page: 77 ident: CR17 article-title: Deficient lower-segment cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1002/uog.5200 – volume: 15 start-page: 179 year: 2015 ident: CR1 article-title: Variation in hospital caesarean section rates for women with at least one previous caesarean section: a population based cohort study publication-title: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0609-x – volume: 375 start-page: 490 issue: 9713 year: 2010 end-page: 499 ident: CR13 article-title: Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007–08 publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61870-5 – volume: 34 start-page: 267 issue: 4 year: 2010 end-page: 271 ident: CR10 article-title: Predicting uterine rupture in women undergoing trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery publication-title: Semin Perinatol doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2010.03.005 – volume: 22 start-page: 3288 year: 2016 end-page: 3295 ident: CR7 article-title: Pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcomes of fertilization-embryo transfer in patient with previous cesarean scar publication-title: Med Sci Monit doi: 10.12659/MSM.900581 – volume: 11 start-page: e0148343 issue: 2 year: 2016 ident: CR2 article-title: The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990–2014 publication-title: PLoS One doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148343 – volume: 17 start-page: 265 issue: 3 year: 2005 end-page: 276 ident: CR15 article-title: Uterine contractility and embryo implantation publication-title: Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/01.gco.0000169104.85128.0e – volume: 101 start-page: 61 issue: 1 year: 2003 end-page: 65 ident: CR19 article-title: Detection of cesarean scars by transvaginal ultrasound publication-title: Obstet Gynecol – volume: 106 start-page: 311 issue: 2 year: 2016 ident: 1828_CR21 publication-title: Fertil Steril doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.045 – volume: 107 start-page: 771 issue: 4 year: 2006 ident: 1828_CR24 publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000206182.63788.80 – volume: 29 start-page: 465 issue: 6 year: 2012 ident: 1828_CR26 publication-title: Am J Perinatol doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1304829 – volume: 121 start-page: 789 issue: 4 year: 2013 ident: 1828_CR3 publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182878b43 – volume: 99 start-page: 976 issue: 6 year: 2002 ident: 1828_CR30 publication-title: Obstet Gynecol – volume: 124 start-page: 32 issue: 1 year: 2006 ident: 1828_CR9 publication-title: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.03.023 – volume: 99 start-page: 731 issue: 3 year: 2013 ident: 1828_CR23 publication-title: Fertil Steril doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.11.023 – volume: 36 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2010 ident: 1828_CR16 publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1002/uog.7714 – volume: 187 start-page: 1199 issue: 5 year: 2002 ident: 1828_CR29 publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.127138 – volume: 34 start-page: 267 issue: 4 year: 2010 ident: 1828_CR10 publication-title: Semin Perinatol doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2010.03.005 – volume: 15 start-page: 179 year: 2015 ident: 1828_CR1 publication-title: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0609-x – volume: 43 start-page: 237 issue: 2 year: 2016 ident: 1828_CR22 publication-title: J Med Ultrason (2001) doi: 10.1007/s10396-015-0678-5 – volume: 188 start-page: 39 year: 2015 ident: 1828_CR25 publication-title: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.02.018 – volume: 40 start-page: 557 issue: 5 year: 2012 ident: 1828_CR14 publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1002/uog.11133 – volume: 375 start-page: 490 issue: 9713 year: 2010 ident: 1828_CR13 publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61870-5 – volume: 26 start-page: 1003 issue: 10 year: 2013 ident: 1828_CR27 publication-title: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.765854 – volume: 28 start-page: 1489 issue: 6 year: 2013 ident: 1828_CR5 publication-title: Hum Reprod doi: 10.1093/humrep/det110 – volume: 107 start-page: 322 issue: 2 year: 1970 ident: 1828_CR11 publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(70)90606-X – volume: 48 start-page: 323 issue: Suppl1 year: 2016 ident: 1828_CR33 publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1002/uog.16974 – volume: 120 start-page: 1332 issue: 6 year: 2012 ident: 1828_CR31 publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318273695b – volume: 37 start-page: 880 issue: 10 year: 1992 ident: 1828_CR28 publication-title: J Repord Med Gynecol – volume: 22 start-page: 3288 year: 2016 ident: 1828_CR7 publication-title: Med Sci Monit doi: 10.12659/MSM.900581 – volume: 14 start-page: 16 issue: 1 year: 1995 ident: 1828_CR12 publication-title: Int J Gynecol Pathol doi: 10.1097/00004347-199501000-00004 – volume: 106 start-page: 30 issue: 1 year: 2009 ident: 1828_CR6 publication-title: Int J Gynaecol Obstet doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.02.019 – volume: 31 start-page: 72 issue: 1 year: 2008 ident: 1828_CR17 publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1002/uog.5200 – volume: 11 start-page: e0148343 issue: 2 year: 2016 ident: 1828_CR2 publication-title: PLoS One doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148343 – volume: 29 start-page: 7 issue: 1 year: 2012 ident: 1828_CR4 publication-title: Am J Perinatol doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1285829 – volume: 21 start-page: 1447 year: 2015 ident: 1828_CR32 publication-title: Med Sci Monit doi: 10.12659/MSM.893333 – volume: 34 start-page: 85 issue: 1 year: 2009 ident: 1828_CR8 publication-title: Ultrasound Obstetric Gynecol doi: 10.1002/uog.6405 – volume: 17 start-page: 265 issue: 3 year: 2005 ident: 1828_CR15 publication-title: Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/01.gco.0000169104.85128.0e – volume: 101 start-page: 61 issue: 1 year: 2003 ident: 1828_CR19 publication-title: Obstet Gynecol – volume: 33 start-page: 759 issue: 8 year: 2013 ident: 1828_CR18 publication-title: J Obstet Gynaecol doi: 10.3109/01443615.2013.816663 – volume: 18 start-page: 13 issue: 1 year: 1999 ident: 1828_CR20 publication-title: J Ultrasound Med doi: 10.7863/jum.1999.18.1.13 |
SSID | ssj0057624 ssib031263182 ssj0002039635 ssib051367596 ssib034325102 |
Score | 2.2995448 |
Snippet | The impact of prior cesarean section(CS) on the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer(IVF-ET) was investigated. A... Summary The impact of prior cesarean section (CS) on the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) was... The impact of prior cesarean section (CS) on the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) was investigated. A... The impact of prior cesarean section (CS) on the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) was investigated.A... |
SourceID | wanfang proquest pubmed crossref springer chongqing |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 922 |
SubjectTerms | Medicine Medicine & Public Health |
Title | Reproductive Outcomes in Women with Prior Cesarean Section Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization:A Retrospective Case-control Study |
URI | http://lib.cqvip.com/qk/85740A/201706/674385618.html https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11596-017-1828-3 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29270754 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1979968291 https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/tjykdxxb-e201706019 |
Volume | 37 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVLSH databaseName: SpringerLink Journals customDbUrl: mediaType: online eissn: 1993-1352 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0002039635 issn: 1672-0733 databaseCode: AFBBN dateStart: 19970301 isFulltext: true providerName: Library Specific Holdings – providerCode: PRVAVX databaseName: SpringerLINK - Czech Republic Consortium customDbUrl: eissn: 1993-1352 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0057624 issn: 1672-0733 databaseCode: AGYKE dateStart: 19970101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://link.springer.com providerName: Springer Nature – providerCode: PRVAVX databaseName: SpringerLink Journals (ICM) customDbUrl: eissn: 1993-1352 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0057624 issn: 1672-0733 databaseCode: U2A dateStart: 20020101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://www.springerlink.com/journals/ providerName: Springer Nature |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3fb9MwELbK9sILAvGrDCYj7YnKU5Kmacxbh5gqBJOKWtE9RUlsQ2EkJU3Q2BP_FP8fd7GdpBQm4KFR5bh26u_L3dm-OxNy5A6ViINEslTJEQONnzKuZMKU76QK84FLWTvIngXThf9qOVr2ej86XktVmRynV7-NK_kfVKEMcMUo2X9AtmkUCuA74AtXQBiuf4UxWM86YSu6_-RVCX3U_lU6r4JeY10Xq7wYgDSIC1x030h9NjjGjhXvcxPR8nVVFvlAoY_1hQnM1CHrhYQbNhpzkILKY9a5vU1Mu2vbTqv46gOeYrTt92EFCS7Wt2v6x81ukVHHjZn_zixmn8dstmpYfK7THszjFXsdG8ULxcuq9heEEvamrTyrvRVm8BKwt7mpbBY5QHG2DiNaLgdjdJLVOTOs4NbZYgxBu1KY61DnHe3gmGhpMOFwGQV6gfkmG3brwuCuP9d08bg3BnvKbxVl475ob90g-944CPDgjIU3sQYAzOD0Wcr2me1meh2x-UvfmIzatIbZPRCaLwD9tpW0M_XpbNvXwWaZgsHt2EXz2-SWAZ1ONDvvkJ7M7pLvXWZSy0y6ymjNTIrMpDUzqWUmNcykLTOxfs1MusXM53RCt3hJu7ykNS_vkcXpy_mLKTNnfbDUd8YlC5x0hHvgPlhVrhf7PvdcRyQicTloEO6LMFUufIYC5ggqTETsOmkghkHiB44KxfA-2cvyTD4kdCSdkScdX3A09v2Ec6lCngo-dnkiXNUnB804R2ud0yXCWJwQ5hJhnzh25KPUpMnH01ouojbBN2IYAYYRYhgN--RZ8xPb3jWVn1o4I5DkuD0XZzKvNhH-Ux6EHnf75IHGuWnOcqRPBhb4yAiizXV9HRlutJXLj98-icvLJJKeTp3l8kd_7O6A3Gzfxsdkrywq-QSM8DI5JPuT05OTs8Oa-j8BTtDevg |
linkProvider | Springer Nature |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reproductive+outcomes+in+women+with+prior+cesarean+section+undergoing+in+vitro+fertilization%3A+A+retrospective+case-control+study&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+Huazhong+University+of+Science+and+Technology.+Medical+sciences&rft.au=Wang%2C+Ya-Qin&rft.au=Yin%2C+Tai-Lang&rft.au=Xu%2C+Wang-Min&rft.au=Qi%2C+Qian-Rong&rft.date=2017-12-01&rft.issn=1672-0733&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=922&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs11596-017-1828-3&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F29270754&rft.externalDocID=29270754 |
thumbnail_s | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=http%3A%2F%2Fimage.cqvip.com%2Fvip1000%2Fqk%2F85740A%2F85740A.jpg http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wanfangdata.com.cn%2Fimages%2FPeriodicalImages%2Ftjykdxxb-e%2Ftjykdxxb-e.jpg |