Reproductive Outcomes in Women with Prior Cesarean Section Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization:A Retrospective Case-control Study

The impact of prior cesarean section(CS) on the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer(IVF-ET) was investigated. A retrospective analysis was performed on 144 patients with prior CS between January 2013 and December 2015. The pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCurrent medical science Vol. 37; no. 6; pp. 922 - 927
Main Author 王雅琴;尹太郎;徐望明;漆倩荣;王笑臣;杨菁
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Wuhan Huazhong University of Science and Technology 01.12.2017
Hubei Clinic Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Embryonic Development,Wuhan 430060,China
Reproductive Medical Center,Renmin Hospital,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430060,China
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1672-0733
2096-5230
1993-1352
1993-1352
2523-899X
DOI10.1007/s11596-017-1828-3

Cover

Abstract The impact of prior cesarean section(CS) on the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer(IVF-ET) was investigated. A retrospective analysis was performed on 144 patients with prior CS between January 2013 and December 2015. The pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcomes of patients who had previous CS delivery and received IVF-ET were analyzed. The control group comprised 166 patients who had only previous vaginal delivery(VD) and received IVF-ET during the same period. The results showed that the basal follicle stimulating hormone level, estradiol level on human chorionic gonadotropin(h CG) day, gonadotrophin dosage, duration of stimulation, retrieved oocytes, fertilization rate, high-quality embryo rate, multiple birth rate, abortion rate and ectopic pregnancy rate had no significant difference between the two groups(P〉0.05). The pregnancy rate(40.28% vs. 54.22%) and implantation rate(24.01% vs. 34.67%) were significantly lower(P〈0.05), and the ratio of embryo difficulty transfer(9/144 vs. 0/166) was significantly higher in CS group than in VD group. The risk of pernicious placenta previa and postpartum hemorrhage in twin deliveries was significantly increased in CS group as compared with that in VD group(P〈0.05), and gestational age and neonatal birth weight were significantly reduced in twin deliveries as compared with singleton deliveries in both groups(P〈0.05). It was suggested that the existence of CS scar may impact embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy outcome, and increase the difficulty of ET. We should limit the number of transfer embryos to avoid multiple pregnancies and strengthen gestational supervision in patients with cesarean scar.
AbstractList The impact of prior cesarean section (CS) on the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) was investigated. A retrospective analysis was performed on 144 patients with prior CS between January 2013 and December 2015. The pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcomes of patients who had previous CS delivery and received IVF-ET were analyzed. The control group comprised 166 patients who had only previous vaginal delivery (VD) and received IVF-ET during the same period. The results showed that the basal follicle stimulating hormone level, estradiol level on human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) day, gonadotrophin dosage, duration of stimulation, retrieved oocytes, fertilization rate, high-quality embryo rate, multiple birth rate, abortion rate and ectopic pregnancy rate had no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The pregnancy rate (40.28% vs. 54.22%) and implantation rate (24.01% vs. 34.67%) were significantly lower (P<0.05), and the ratio of embryo difficulty transfer (9/144 vs. 0/166) was significantly higher in CS group than in VD group. The risk of pernicious placenta previa and postpartum hemorrhage in twin deliveries was significantly increased in CS group as compared with that in VD group (P<0.05), and gestational age and neonatal birth weight were significantly reduced in twin deliveries as compared with singleton deliveries in both groups (P<0.05). It was suggested that the existence of CS scar may impact embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy outcome, and increase the difficulty of ET. We should limit the number of transfer embryos to avoid multiple pregnancies and strengthen gestational supervision in patients with cesarean scar.
Summary The impact of prior cesarean section (CS) on the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) was investigated. A retrospective analysis was performed on 144 patients with prior CS between January 2013 and December 2015. The pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcomes of patients who had previous CS delivery and received IVF-ET were analyzed. The control group comprised 166 patients who had only previous vaginal delivery (VD) and received IVF-ET during the same period. The results showed that the basal follicle stimulating hormone level, estradiol level on human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) day, gonadotrophin dosage, duration of stimulation, retrieved oocytes, fertilization rate, high-quality embryo rate, multiple birth rate, abortion rate and ectopic pregnancy rate had no significant difference between the two groups ( P >0.05). The pregnancy rate (40.28% vs. 54.22%) and implantation rate (24.01% vs. 34.67%) were significantly lower ( P <0.05), and the ratio of embryo difficulty transfer (9/144 vs. 0/166) was significantly higher in CS group than in VD group. The risk of pernicious placenta previa and postpartum hemorrhage in twin deliveries was significantly increased in CS group as compared with that in VD group ( P <0.05), and gestational age and neonatal birth weight were significantly reduced in twin deliveries as compared with singleton deliveries in both groups ( P <0.05). It was suggested that the existence of CS scar may impact embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy outcome, and increase the difficulty of ET. We should limit the number of transfer embryos to avoid multiple pregnancies and strengthen gestational supervision in patients with cesarean scar.
The impact of prior cesarean section(CS) on the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer(IVF-ET) was investigated. A retrospective analysis was performed on 144 patients with prior CS between January 2013 and December 2015. The pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcomes of patients who had previous CS delivery and received IVF-ET were analyzed. The control group comprised 166 patients who had only previous vaginal delivery(VD) and received IVF-ET during the same period. The results showed that the basal follicle stimulating hormone level, estradiol level on human chorionic gonadotropin(h CG) day, gonadotrophin dosage, duration of stimulation, retrieved oocytes, fertilization rate, high-quality embryo rate, multiple birth rate, abortion rate and ectopic pregnancy rate had no significant difference between the two groups(P〉0.05). The pregnancy rate(40.28% vs. 54.22%) and implantation rate(24.01% vs. 34.67%) were significantly lower(P〈0.05), and the ratio of embryo difficulty transfer(9/144 vs. 0/166) was significantly higher in CS group than in VD group. The risk of pernicious placenta previa and postpartum hemorrhage in twin deliveries was significantly increased in CS group as compared with that in VD group(P〈0.05), and gestational age and neonatal birth weight were significantly reduced in twin deliveries as compared with singleton deliveries in both groups(P〈0.05). It was suggested that the existence of CS scar may impact embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy outcome, and increase the difficulty of ET. We should limit the number of transfer embryos to avoid multiple pregnancies and strengthen gestational supervision in patients with cesarean scar.
The impact of prior cesarean section (CS) on the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) was investigated. A retrospective analysis was performed on 144 patients with prior CS between January 2013 and December 2015. The pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcomes of patients who had previous CS delivery and received IVF-ET were analyzed. The control group comprised 166 patients who had only previous vaginal delivery (VD) and received IVF-ET during the same period. The results showed that the basal follicle stimulating hormone level, estradiol level on human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) day, gonadotrophin dosage, duration of stimulation, retrieved oocytes, fertilization rate, high-quality embryo rate, multiple birth rate, abortion rate and ectopic pregnancy rate had no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The pregnancy rate (40.28% vs. 54.22%) and implantation rate (24.01% vs. 34.67%) were significantly lower (P<0.05), and the ratio of embryo difficulty transfer (9/144 vs. 0/166) was significantly higher in CS group than in VD group. The risk of pernicious placenta previa and postpartum hemorrhage in twin deliveries was significantly increased in CS group as compared with that in VD group (P<0.05), and gestational age and neonatal birth weight were significantly reduced in twin deliveries as compared with singleton deliveries in both groups (P<0.05). It was suggested that the existence of CS scar may impact embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy outcome, and increase the difficulty of ET. We should limit the number of transfer embryos to avoid multiple pregnancies and strengthen gestational supervision in patients with cesarean scar.The impact of prior cesarean section (CS) on the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) was investigated. A retrospective analysis was performed on 144 patients with prior CS between January 2013 and December 2015. The pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcomes of patients who had previous CS delivery and received IVF-ET were analyzed. The control group comprised 166 patients who had only previous vaginal delivery (VD) and received IVF-ET during the same period. The results showed that the basal follicle stimulating hormone level, estradiol level on human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) day, gonadotrophin dosage, duration of stimulation, retrieved oocytes, fertilization rate, high-quality embryo rate, multiple birth rate, abortion rate and ectopic pregnancy rate had no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The pregnancy rate (40.28% vs. 54.22%) and implantation rate (24.01% vs. 34.67%) were significantly lower (P<0.05), and the ratio of embryo difficulty transfer (9/144 vs. 0/166) was significantly higher in CS group than in VD group. The risk of pernicious placenta previa and postpartum hemorrhage in twin deliveries was significantly increased in CS group as compared with that in VD group (P<0.05), and gestational age and neonatal birth weight were significantly reduced in twin deliveries as compared with singleton deliveries in both groups (P<0.05). It was suggested that the existence of CS scar may impact embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy outcome, and increase the difficulty of ET. We should limit the number of transfer embryos to avoid multiple pregnancies and strengthen gestational supervision in patients with cesarean scar.
The impact of prior cesarean section (CS) on the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) was investigated.A retrospective analysis was performed on 144 patients with prior CS between January 2013 and December 2015.The pregnancy,delivery,and neonatal outcomes of patients who had previous CS delivery and received IVF-ET were analyzed.The control group comprised 166 patients who had only previous vaginal delivery (VD) and received IVF-ET during the same period.The results showed that the basal follicle stimulating hormone level,estradiol level on human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) day,gonadotrophin dosage,duration of stimulation,retrieved oocytes,fertilization rate,high-quality embryo rate,multiple birth rate,abortion rate and ectopic pregnancy rate had no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05).The pregnancy rate (40.28% vs.54.22%) and implantation rate (24.01% vs.34.67%) were significantly lower (P<0.05),and the ratio of embryo difficulty transfer (9/144 vs.0/166) was significantly higher in CS group than in VD group.The risk of pernicious placenta previa and postpartum hemorrhage in twin deliveries was significantly increased in CS group as compared with that in VD group (P<0.05),and gestational age and neonatal birth weight were significantly reduced in twin deliveries as compared with singleton deliveries in both groups (P<0.05).It was suggested that the existence of CS scar may impact embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy outcome,and increase the difficulty of ET.We should limit the number of transfer embryos to avoid multiple pregnancies and strengthen gestational supervision in patients with cesarean scar.
Author 王雅琴;尹太郎;徐望明;漆倩荣;王笑臣;杨菁
AuthorAffiliation Reproductive Medical Center, Renmin Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China;Hubei Clinic Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Embryonic Development, Wuhan 430060, China
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: Reproductive Medical Center,Renmin Hospital,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430060,China;Hubei Clinic Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Embryonic Development,Wuhan 430060,China
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: 王雅琴;尹太郎;徐望明;漆倩荣;王笑臣;杨菁
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29270754$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kUtuFDEURUsoiHxgAUyQxQgJFfhX_gyjVkIiRQpKCAwtV9nVcVNtd2wXSWfGNlgLe2ILuKkOSAwysPz0dO679n371Y4P3lbVSwTfIQj5-4RQI1kNEa-RwKImT6o9JCWpEWnwTqkZxzXkhOxW-yktIGw4w_RZtYsl5pA3dK_6fmFXMZixy-6bBedj7sLSJuA8-FIKD25dvgYfowsRzGzS0WoPLm2hgwdX3tg4D87PwakHn12OARzbmN3g7vWG-PXzxyG4sKWfVnZymOlk6y740hvAZR7N-nn1tNdDsi-290F1dXz0aXZSn51_OJ0dntUdhTzXDHYN5oJSQhHCmlKJETStaZHkkkhqRNejcoiBoulFazSCHTOEtZTBXhhyUL2d5t5q32s_V4swRl8cVV6sv5q7u1ZZXKKEDCJZ6DcTXdK5GW3KaulSZ4dBexvGpDaukgksUUFfbdGxXVqjVtEtdVyrh5ALwCegK0GkaHvVufwnoBy1GxSCarNONa1TlTeozToVKUr0n_Jh-GMaPGlSYf3cxn8ffUz0emt0Hfz8puj-OjFOiWgYEuQ35Fa_RA
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1080_14647273_2019_1696990
crossref_primary_10_3389_fendo_2022_851213
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00404_022_06436_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejogrb_2022_02_016
crossref_primary_10_12688_f1000research_160214_1
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10815_022_02627_5
crossref_primary_10_3892_etm_2024_12572
crossref_primary_10_3389_fendo_2022_813791
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jogoh_2023_102692
crossref_primary_10_52054_FVVO_14_1_003
Cites_doi 10.1002/uog.11133
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.11.023
10.1055/s-0032-1304829
10.12659/MSM.893333
10.1055/s-0031-1285829
10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.02.019
10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182878b43
10.1093/humrep/det110
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.02.018
10.1002/uog.6405
10.3109/01443615.2013.816663
10.1016/0002-9378(70)90606-X
10.1002/uog.7714
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.045
10.1097/01.AOG.0000206182.63788.80
10.1067/mob.2002.127138
10.1007/s10396-015-0678-5
10.1097/AOG.0b013e318273695b
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.03.023
10.1097/00004347-199501000-00004
10.7863/jum.1999.18.1.13
10.3109/14767058.2013.765854
10.1002/uog.5200
10.1186/s12884-015-0609-x
10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61870-5
10.1053/j.semperi.2010.03.005
10.12659/MSM.900581
10.1371/journal.pone.0148343
10.1097/01.gco.0000169104.85128.0e
10.1002/uog.16974
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Huazhong University of Science and Technology 2017
Copyright © Wanfang Data Co. Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: Huazhong University of Science and Technology 2017
– notice: Copyright © Wanfang Data Co. Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
DBID 2RA
92L
CQIGP
W91
~WA
AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
2B.
4A8
92I
93N
PSX
TCJ
DOI 10.1007/s11596-017-1828-3
DatabaseName 维普期刊资源整合服务平台
中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点
维普中文期刊数据库
中文科技期刊数据库-医药卫生
中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点
CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
Wanfang Data Journals - Hong Kong
WANFANG Data Centre
Wanfang Data Journals
万方数据期刊 - 香港版
China Online Journals (COJ)
China Online Journals (COJ)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList PubMed


MEDLINE - Academic

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
DocumentTitleAlternate Reproductive Outcomes in Women with Prior Cesarean Section Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization:A Retrospective Case-control Study
EISSN 1993-1352
2523-899X
EndPage 927
ExternalDocumentID tjykdxxb_e201706019
29270754
10_1007_s11596_017_1828_3
674385618
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID -5E
-5G
-BR
-Y2
-~C
.86
.VR
06C
06D
0R~
0VY
1N0
29K
29~
2B.
2C~
2J2
2KG
2KM
2LR
2RA
2~H
30V
4.4
408
40D
40E
53G
5GY
5VS
6NX
8TC
8UJ
92F
92I
92L
95-
95.
95~
96X
AAAVM
AABHQ
AAJKR
AANXM
AARHV
AARTL
AAYIU
AAYQN
AAYTO
ABFTV
ABJNI
ABJOX
ABKCH
ABMNI
ABNWP
ABQBU
ABTMW
ACGFS
ACHXU
ACKNC
ACOMO
ACSNA
ACUDM
ADHIR
ADINQ
ADKPE
ADURQ
ADYFF
ADZKW
AEBTG
AEGNC
AEJHL
AEKMD
AEOHA
AEPYU
AETLH
AEXYK
AFWTZ
AFZKB
AGAYW
AGDGC
AGQMX
AGWIL
AGWZB
AGYKE
AHAVH
AHBYD
AHKAY
AHYZX
AIIXL
AJBLW
AJRNO
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALWAN
AMKLP
ARMRJ
AZFZN
B-.
BA0
BGNMA
CAG
CCEZO
CHBEP
CIEJG
COF
CQIGP
CS3
CSCUP
CW9
D-I
DPUIP
EBS
EJD
ESBYG
FA0
FEDTE
FNLPD
FRRFC
FWDCC
G-Y
G-Z
GGCAI
GGRSB
GJIRD
GQ6
GQ7
HF~
HG6
HMJXF
HRMNR
HVGLF
HZ~
IJ-
IXD
I~X
I~Z
J-C
JBSCW
JUIAU
KOV
M4Y
MA-
N2Q
NDZJH
NQJWS
NU0
O9-
O93
O9I
O9J
P9S
PF0
QOR
QOS
R-E
R89
R9I
RIG
ROL
RPX
RSV
S..
S16
S1Z
S27
S37
S3B
SAP
SCL
SDH
SHX
SMD
SNE
SNX
SOJ
SPISZ
SZ9
SZN
T13
TCJ
TSG
TT1
TUC
U2A
U9L
UG4
VC2
W48
W91
WK8
Z7U
Z82
Z8V
ZOVNA
~A9
~WA
-05
-0E
-EM
-SE
-S~
2JN
2JY
406
5VR
92M
9D9
9DE
AACDK
AAHNG
AAIAL
AAJBT
AANZL
AASML
AATNV
AAUYE
AAXDM
AAYZH
ABAKF
ABDZT
ABECU
ABHQN
ABKZE
ABMQK
ABSXP
ABTEG
ABTKH
ABWNU
ABXPI
ACAOD
ACDTI
ACHSB
ACMDZ
ACMLO
ACOKC
ACZOJ
ADKNI
ADRFC
ADTPH
AEFQL
AEJRE
AEMSY
AESKC
AEVLU
AFBBN
AFLOW
AFQWF
AFUIB
AGJBK
AGMZJ
AGQEE
AGRTI
AHSBF
AIAKS
AIGIU
AILAN
AITGF
AMXSW
AMYLF
AMYQR
AOCGG
AXYYD
BDATZ
CAJEE
DDRTE
DNIVK
EBLON
EIOEI
FERAY
FFXSO
FIGPU
FINBP
FSGXE
GNWQR
GRRUI
IKXTQ
IWAJR
JZLTJ
LLZTM
NPVJJ
PT4
Q--
RHV
RT5
SCLPG
SDE
SISQX
SJYHP
SNPRN
SOHCF
SRMVM
SSLCW
STPWE
T8U
TGQ
U1F
U1G
U5E
U5O
UOJIU
UTJUX
UZXMN
VFIZW
YLTOR
Z87
ZMTXR
AAPKM
AAYXX
ABBRH
ABDBE
ABFSG
ABRTQ
ACSTC
AEZWR
AFDZB
AFHIU
AFOHR
AHPBZ
AHWEU
AIXLP
ATHPR
AYFIA
CITATION
ABQSL
ADHKG
AGQPQ
H13
NPM
7X8
4A8
93N
PSX
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-60c52784434112a449210dbdb1979394d8cf18cf3d085f8bda10c6d36b460f8d3
ISSN 1672-0733
2096-5230
1993-1352
IngestDate Thu May 29 04:06:48 EDT 2025
Fri Sep 05 05:03:13 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:41:45 EDT 2025
Wed Oct 01 04:53:50 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:07:21 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 21 02:37:18 EST 2025
Wed Feb 14 09:55:45 EST 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Keywords fertilization and embryo transfer
cesarean section
complication
pregnancy
in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c407t-60c52784434112a449210dbdb1979394d8cf18cf3d085f8bda10c6d36b460f8d3
Notes The impact of prior cesarean section(CS) on the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer(IVF-ET) was investigated. A retrospective analysis was performed on 144 patients with prior CS between January 2013 and December 2015. The pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcomes of patients who had previous CS delivery and received IVF-ET were analyzed. The control group comprised 166 patients who had only previous vaginal delivery(VD) and received IVF-ET during the same period. The results showed that the basal follicle stimulating hormone level, estradiol level on human chorionic gonadotropin(h CG) day, gonadotrophin dosage, duration of stimulation, retrieved oocytes, fertilization rate, high-quality embryo rate, multiple birth rate, abortion rate and ectopic pregnancy rate had no significant difference between the two groups(P〉0.05). The pregnancy rate(40.28% vs. 54.22%) and implantation rate(24.01% vs. 34.67%) were significantly lower(P〈0.05), and the ratio of embryo difficulty transfer(9/144 vs. 0/166) was significantly higher in CS group than in VD group. The risk of pernicious placenta previa and postpartum hemorrhage in twin deliveries was significantly increased in CS group as compared with that in VD group(P〈0.05), and gestational age and neonatal birth weight were significantly reduced in twin deliveries as compared with singleton deliveries in both groups(P〈0.05). It was suggested that the existence of CS scar may impact embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy outcome, and increase the difficulty of ET. We should limit the number of transfer embryos to avoid multiple pregnancies and strengthen gestational supervision in patients with cesarean scar.
Ya-qin WANG Tai-lang YIN , Wang-min XU , Qian-rong QI Xiao-chen WANG , Jing YANG ( 1Reproductive Medical Center, Renmin Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China 2Hubei Clinic Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Embryonic Development, Wuhan 430060, China)
42-1679/R
cesarean section in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer pregnancy complication
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 29270754
PQID 1979968291
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 6
ParticipantIDs wanfang_journals_tjykdxxb_e201706019
proquest_miscellaneous_1979968291
pubmed_primary_29270754
crossref_citationtrail_10_1007_s11596_017_1828_3
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11596_017_1828_3
springer_journals_10_1007_s11596_017_1828_3
chongqing_primary_674385618
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2017-12-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2017-12-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2017
  text: 2017-12-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Wuhan
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Wuhan
– name: China
PublicationTitle Current medical science
PublicationTitleAbbrev CURR MED SCI
PublicationTitleAlternate Journal of Zuazhong University of Science and Technology: Medical Edition
PublicationTitle_FL Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Medical Science)
PublicationYear 2017
Publisher Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Hubei Clinic Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Embryonic Development,Wuhan 430060,China
Reproductive Medical Center,Renmin Hospital,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430060,China
Publisher_xml – name: Huazhong University of Science and Technology
– name: Reproductive Medical Center,Renmin Hospital,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430060,China
– name: Hubei Clinic Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Embryonic Development,Wuhan 430060,China
References Armstrong, Hansen, van Voorhis (CR19) 2003; 101
Sazonova, Kallen, Thurin-Kjellberg (CR23) 2013; 99
Okumura, Francisco, Kondo (CR33) 2016; 48
Bulletti, De Ziegler (CR15) 2005; 17
Ryo, Sakurai, Kamata (CR22) 2016; 43
Nguyen (CR28) 1992; 37
Morris (CR12) 1995; 14
Naji, Daemen, Smith (CR14) 2012; 40
Schemann, Patterson, Nippita (CR1) 2015; 15
Thurmond, Harvey, Smith (CR20) 1999; 18
Naji, Wynants, Smith (CR5) 2013; 28
Brosens, Gellersen (CR16) 2010; 36
Yazicioglu, Gokdogan, Kelekci (CR9) 2006; 124
Gilliam, Rosenberg, Davis (CR30) 2002; 99
Patounakis, Ozcan, Chason (CR21) 2016; 106
Marjolein Bij de Vaate, Linskens, van der Voet (CR25) 2015; 188
Gyamfi-Bannerman, Gilbert, Landon (CR31) 2012; 120
Bujold, Mehta, Bujold (CR29) 2002; 187
Allornuvor, Xue, Zhu (CR18) 2013; 33
Wojdecki, Grynsztajn (CR11) 1970; 107
Getahun, Oyelese, Salihu (CR24) 2006; 107
Lumbiganon, Laopaiboon, Gulmezoglu (CR13) 2010; 375
Landon (CR10) 2010; 34
Miller, Hahn, Grobman (CR3) 2013; 121
Ben-Nagi, Walker, Jurkovic (CR6) 2009; 106
Kessous, Sheiner (CR27) 2013; 26
Betrán, Ye, Moller (CR2) 2016; 11
Wang, Chiu, Lee (CR8) 2009; 34
Gregory, Jackson, Korst (CR4) 2012; 29
Zhang, Chen, Xu (CR7) 2016; 22
Ofili-Yebovi, Ben-Nagi, Sawyer (CR17) 2008; 31
Kaplanoglu, Bulbul, Kaplanoglu (CR32) 2015; 21
Roberge, Boutin, Chaillet (CR26) 2012; 29
M Kaplanoglu (1828_CR32) 2015; 21
C Bulletti (1828_CR15) 2005; 17
GF Allornuvor (1828_CR18) 2013; 33
M Okumura (1828_CR33) 2016; 48
D Getahun (1828_CR24) 2006; 107
AP Betrán (1828_CR2) 2016; 11
O Naji (1828_CR14) 2012; 40
K Schemann (1828_CR1) 2015; 15
CB Wang (1828_CR8) 2009; 34
J Ben-Nagi (1828_CR6) 2009; 106
E Ryo (1828_CR22) 2016; 43
A Sazonova (1828_CR23) 2013; 99
M Gilliam (1828_CR30) 2002; 99
O Naji (1828_CR5) 2013; 28
P Lumbiganon (1828_CR13) 2010; 375
V Armstrong (1828_CR19) 2003; 101
E Bujold (1828_CR29) 2002; 187
JJ Brosens (1828_CR16) 2010; 36
AJ Marjolein Bij de Vaate (1828_CR25) 2015; 188
TV Nguyen (1828_CR28) 1992; 37
J Wojdecki (1828_CR11) 1970; 107
AS Thurmond (1828_CR20) 1999; 18
S Roberge (1828_CR26) 2012; 29
MB Landon (1828_CR10) 2010; 34
R Kessous (1828_CR27) 2013; 26
C Gyamfi-Bannerman (1828_CR31) 2012; 120
G Patounakis (1828_CR21) 2016; 106
KD Gregory (1828_CR4) 2012; 29
F Yazicioglu (1828_CR9) 2006; 124
H Morris (1828_CR12) 1995; 14
D Ofili-Yebovi (1828_CR17) 2008; 31
ES Miller (1828_CR3) 2013; 121
NY Zhang (1828_CR7) 2016; 22
References_xml – volume: 40
  start-page: 557
  issue: 5
  year: 2012
  end-page: 561
  ident: CR14
  article-title: Does the presence of a cesarean section scar influence the site of placental implantation and subsequent migration in future pregnancies: a prospective case-control study
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1002/uog.11133
– volume: 99
  start-page: 731
  issue: 3
  year: 2013
  end-page: 737
  ident: CR23
  article-title: Neonatal and maternal outcomes comparing women undergoing two fertilization (IVF) singleton pregnancies and women undergoing one IVF twin pregnancy
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
  doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.11.023
– volume: 29
  start-page: 465
  issue: 6
  year: 2012
  end-page: 471
  ident: CR26
  article-title: Systematic review of cesarean scar assessment in the nonpregnant state: imaging techniques and uterine scar defect
  publication-title: Am J Perinatol
  doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1304829
– volume: 21
  start-page: 1447
  year: 2015
  end-page: 1453
  ident: CR32
  article-title: Effect of multiple repeat cesarean sections on maternal morbidity: data from southeast Turkey
  publication-title: Med Sci Monit
  doi: 10.12659/MSM.893333
– volume: 29
  start-page: 7
  issue: 1
  year: 2012
  end-page: 18
  ident: CR4
  article-title: Cesarean versus vaginal delivery: whose risks? Whose benefits
  publication-title: Am J Perinatol
  doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1285829
– volume: 106
  start-page: 30
  issue: 1
  year: 2009
  end-page: 34
  ident: CR6
  article-title: Effect of cesarean delivery on the endometrium
  publication-title: Int J Gynaecol Obstet
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.02.019
– volume: 121
  start-page: 789
  issue: 4
  year: 2013
  end-page: 797
  ident: CR3
  article-title: Consequences of a primary elective cesarean delivery across the reproductive life
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182878b43
– volume: 28
  start-page: 1489
  issue: 6
  year: 2013
  end-page: 1496
  ident: CR5
  article-title: Does the presence of a caesarean section scar affect implantation site and early pregnancy outcome in women attending an early pregnancy assessment unit?
  publication-title: Hum Reprod
  doi: 10.1093/humrep/det110
– volume: 188
  start-page: 39
  year: 2015
  end-page: 44
  ident: CR25
  article-title: Reproducibility of three-dimensional ultrasound for the measurement of a niche in a caesarean scar and assessment of its shape
  publication-title: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.02.018
– volume: 34
  start-page: 85
  issue: 1
  year: 2009
  end-page: 89
  ident: CR8
  article-title: Ceasarean scar defect: correlation between cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstetric Gynecol
  doi: 10.1002/uog.6405
– volume: 33
  start-page: 759
  issue: 8
  year: 2013
  end-page: 763
  ident: CR18
  article-title: The definition, aetiology, presentation, diagnosis and management of previous caesarean scardefects
  publication-title: J Obstet Gynaecol
  doi: 10.3109/01443615.2013.816663
– volume: 107
  start-page: 322
  issue: 2
  year: 1970
  end-page: 324
  ident: CR11
  article-title: Scar formation in the uterus after cesarean section
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(70)90606-X
– volume: 36
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 2010
  end-page: 5
  ident: CR16
  article-title: Something new about early pregnancy: decidual biosensoring and natural embryo selection
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1002/uog.7714
– volume: 106
  start-page: 311
  issue: 2
  year: 2016
  end-page: 316
  ident: CR21
  article-title: Impact of a prior cesarean delivery on embryo transfer: a prospective study
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
  doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.045
– volume: 107
  start-page: 771
  issue: 4
  year: 2006
  end-page: 778
  ident: CR24
  article-title: Previous cesarean delivery and risks of placenta previa and placental abruption
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000206182.63788.80
– volume: 48
  start-page: 323
  issue: Suppl1
  year: 2016
  ident: CR33
  article-title: EP14.03: Ultrasound diagnosis and evaluation of the number of prior caesarean deliveries as risk factor for placenta accreta in placenta previa cases
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 187
  start-page: 1199
  issue: 5
  year: 2002
  end-page: 1202
  ident: CR29
  article-title: Interdelivery interval and uterine rupture
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.127138
– volume: 99
  start-page: 976
  issue: 6
  year: 2002
  end-page: 980
  ident: CR30
  article-title: The likelihood of placenta previa with greater number of cesarean deliveries and higher parit
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 43
  start-page: 237
  issue: 2
  year: 2016
  end-page: 242
  ident: CR22
  article-title: Changes in uterine flexion caused by cesarean section: correlation between post-flexion and deficient cesarean section scars
  publication-title: J Med Ultrason (2001)
  doi: 10.1007/s10396-015-0678-5
– volume: 120
  start-page: 1332
  issue: 6
  year: 2012
  end-page: 1337
  ident: CR31
  article-title: Risk of uterine rupture and placenta accreta with prior uterine surgery outside of the lower segment
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318273695b
– volume: 124
  start-page: 32
  issue: 1
  year: 2006
  end-page: 36
  ident: CR9
  article-title: Incomplete healing of the uterine incision after caesarean section: Is it preventable
  publication-title: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.03.023
– volume: 14
  start-page: 16
  issue: 1
  year: 1995
  end-page: 20
  ident: CR12
  article-title: Surgical pathology of the lower uterine segment caesarean section scar: is the scar a source of clinical symptoms
  publication-title: Int J Gynecol Pathol
  doi: 10.1097/00004347-199501000-00004
– volume: 18
  start-page: 13
  issue: 1
  year: 1999
  end-page: 16
  ident: CR20
  article-title: Cesarean section scar as a cause of abnormal vaginal bleeding: diagnosis by sonohysterography
  publication-title: J Ultrasound Med
  doi: 10.7863/jum.1999.18.1.13
– volume: 37
  start-page: 880
  issue: 10
  year: 1992
  end-page: 882
  ident: CR28
  article-title: Vaginal birth after cesarean section at the University of Texas
  publication-title: J Repord Med Gynecol
– volume: 26
  start-page: 1003
  issue: 10
  year: 2013
  end-page: 1006
  ident: CR27
  article-title: Is there an association between short interval from previous cesarean section and adverse obstetric and perinatal outcome?
  publication-title: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med
  doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.765854
– volume: 31
  start-page: 72
  issue: 1
  year: 2008
  end-page: 77
  ident: CR17
  article-title: Deficient lower-segment cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1002/uog.5200
– volume: 15
  start-page: 179
  year: 2015
  ident: CR1
  article-title: Variation in hospital caesarean section rates for women with at least one previous caesarean section: a population based cohort study
  publication-title: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
  doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0609-x
– volume: 375
  start-page: 490
  issue: 9713
  year: 2010
  end-page: 499
  ident: CR13
  article-title: Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007–08
  publication-title: Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61870-5
– volume: 34
  start-page: 267
  issue: 4
  year: 2010
  end-page: 271
  ident: CR10
  article-title: Predicting uterine rupture in women undergoing trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery
  publication-title: Semin Perinatol
  doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2010.03.005
– volume: 22
  start-page: 3288
  year: 2016
  end-page: 3295
  ident: CR7
  article-title: Pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcomes of fertilization-embryo transfer in patient with previous cesarean scar
  publication-title: Med Sci Monit
  doi: 10.12659/MSM.900581
– volume: 11
  start-page: e0148343
  issue: 2
  year: 2016
  ident: CR2
  article-title: The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990–2014
  publication-title: PLoS One
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148343
– volume: 17
  start-page: 265
  issue: 3
  year: 2005
  end-page: 276
  ident: CR15
  article-title: Uterine contractility and embryo implantation
  publication-title: Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1097/01.gco.0000169104.85128.0e
– volume: 101
  start-page: 61
  issue: 1
  year: 2003
  end-page: 65
  ident: CR19
  article-title: Detection of cesarean scars by transvaginal ultrasound
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 106
  start-page: 311
  issue: 2
  year: 2016
  ident: 1828_CR21
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
  doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.045
– volume: 107
  start-page: 771
  issue: 4
  year: 2006
  ident: 1828_CR24
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000206182.63788.80
– volume: 29
  start-page: 465
  issue: 6
  year: 2012
  ident: 1828_CR26
  publication-title: Am J Perinatol
  doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1304829
– volume: 121
  start-page: 789
  issue: 4
  year: 2013
  ident: 1828_CR3
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182878b43
– volume: 99
  start-page: 976
  issue: 6
  year: 2002
  ident: 1828_CR30
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 124
  start-page: 32
  issue: 1
  year: 2006
  ident: 1828_CR9
  publication-title: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.03.023
– volume: 99
  start-page: 731
  issue: 3
  year: 2013
  ident: 1828_CR23
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
  doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.11.023
– volume: 36
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 2010
  ident: 1828_CR16
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1002/uog.7714
– volume: 187
  start-page: 1199
  issue: 5
  year: 2002
  ident: 1828_CR29
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.127138
– volume: 34
  start-page: 267
  issue: 4
  year: 2010
  ident: 1828_CR10
  publication-title: Semin Perinatol
  doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2010.03.005
– volume: 15
  start-page: 179
  year: 2015
  ident: 1828_CR1
  publication-title: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
  doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0609-x
– volume: 43
  start-page: 237
  issue: 2
  year: 2016
  ident: 1828_CR22
  publication-title: J Med Ultrason (2001)
  doi: 10.1007/s10396-015-0678-5
– volume: 188
  start-page: 39
  year: 2015
  ident: 1828_CR25
  publication-title: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.02.018
– volume: 40
  start-page: 557
  issue: 5
  year: 2012
  ident: 1828_CR14
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1002/uog.11133
– volume: 375
  start-page: 490
  issue: 9713
  year: 2010
  ident: 1828_CR13
  publication-title: Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61870-5
– volume: 26
  start-page: 1003
  issue: 10
  year: 2013
  ident: 1828_CR27
  publication-title: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med
  doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.765854
– volume: 28
  start-page: 1489
  issue: 6
  year: 2013
  ident: 1828_CR5
  publication-title: Hum Reprod
  doi: 10.1093/humrep/det110
– volume: 107
  start-page: 322
  issue: 2
  year: 1970
  ident: 1828_CR11
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(70)90606-X
– volume: 48
  start-page: 323
  issue: Suppl1
  year: 2016
  ident: 1828_CR33
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1002/uog.16974
– volume: 120
  start-page: 1332
  issue: 6
  year: 2012
  ident: 1828_CR31
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318273695b
– volume: 37
  start-page: 880
  issue: 10
  year: 1992
  ident: 1828_CR28
  publication-title: J Repord Med Gynecol
– volume: 22
  start-page: 3288
  year: 2016
  ident: 1828_CR7
  publication-title: Med Sci Monit
  doi: 10.12659/MSM.900581
– volume: 14
  start-page: 16
  issue: 1
  year: 1995
  ident: 1828_CR12
  publication-title: Int J Gynecol Pathol
  doi: 10.1097/00004347-199501000-00004
– volume: 106
  start-page: 30
  issue: 1
  year: 2009
  ident: 1828_CR6
  publication-title: Int J Gynaecol Obstet
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.02.019
– volume: 31
  start-page: 72
  issue: 1
  year: 2008
  ident: 1828_CR17
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1002/uog.5200
– volume: 11
  start-page: e0148343
  issue: 2
  year: 2016
  ident: 1828_CR2
  publication-title: PLoS One
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148343
– volume: 29
  start-page: 7
  issue: 1
  year: 2012
  ident: 1828_CR4
  publication-title: Am J Perinatol
  doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1285829
– volume: 21
  start-page: 1447
  year: 2015
  ident: 1828_CR32
  publication-title: Med Sci Monit
  doi: 10.12659/MSM.893333
– volume: 34
  start-page: 85
  issue: 1
  year: 2009
  ident: 1828_CR8
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstetric Gynecol
  doi: 10.1002/uog.6405
– volume: 17
  start-page: 265
  issue: 3
  year: 2005
  ident: 1828_CR15
  publication-title: Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1097/01.gco.0000169104.85128.0e
– volume: 101
  start-page: 61
  issue: 1
  year: 2003
  ident: 1828_CR19
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 33
  start-page: 759
  issue: 8
  year: 2013
  ident: 1828_CR18
  publication-title: J Obstet Gynaecol
  doi: 10.3109/01443615.2013.816663
– volume: 18
  start-page: 13
  issue: 1
  year: 1999
  ident: 1828_CR20
  publication-title: J Ultrasound Med
  doi: 10.7863/jum.1999.18.1.13
SSID ssj0057624
ssib031263182
ssj0002039635
ssib051367596
ssib034325102
Score 2.2995448
Snippet The impact of prior cesarean section(CS) on the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer(IVF-ET) was investigated. A...
Summary The impact of prior cesarean section (CS) on the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) was...
The impact of prior cesarean section (CS) on the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) was investigated. A...
The impact of prior cesarean section (CS) on the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) was investigated.A...
SourceID wanfang
proquest
pubmed
crossref
springer
chongqing
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 922
SubjectTerms Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Title Reproductive Outcomes in Women with Prior Cesarean Section Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization:A Retrospective Case-control Study
URI http://lib.cqvip.com/qk/85740A/201706/674385618.html
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11596-017-1828-3
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29270754
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1979968291
https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/tjykdxxb-e201706019
Volume 37
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVLSH
  databaseName: SpringerLink Journals
  customDbUrl:
  mediaType: online
  eissn: 1993-1352
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0002039635
  issn: 1672-0733
  databaseCode: AFBBN
  dateStart: 19970301
  isFulltext: true
  providerName: Library Specific Holdings
– providerCode: PRVAVX
  databaseName: SpringerLINK - Czech Republic Consortium
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1993-1352
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0057624
  issn: 1672-0733
  databaseCode: AGYKE
  dateStart: 19970101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://link.springer.com
  providerName: Springer Nature
– providerCode: PRVAVX
  databaseName: SpringerLink Journals (ICM)
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1993-1352
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0057624
  issn: 1672-0733
  databaseCode: U2A
  dateStart: 20020101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://www.springerlink.com/journals/
  providerName: Springer Nature
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3fb9MwELbK9sILAvGrDCYj7YnKU5Kmacxbh5gqBJOKWtE9RUlsQ2EkJU3Q2BP_FP8fd7GdpBQm4KFR5bh26u_L3dm-OxNy5A6ViINEslTJEQONnzKuZMKU76QK84FLWTvIngXThf9qOVr2ej86XktVmRynV7-NK_kfVKEMcMUo2X9AtmkUCuA74AtXQBiuf4UxWM86YSu6_-RVCX3U_lU6r4JeY10Xq7wYgDSIC1x030h9NjjGjhXvcxPR8nVVFvlAoY_1hQnM1CHrhYQbNhpzkILKY9a5vU1Mu2vbTqv46gOeYrTt92EFCS7Wt2v6x81ukVHHjZn_zixmn8dstmpYfK7THszjFXsdG8ULxcuq9heEEvamrTyrvRVm8BKwt7mpbBY5QHG2DiNaLgdjdJLVOTOs4NbZYgxBu1KY61DnHe3gmGhpMOFwGQV6gfkmG3brwuCuP9d08bg3BnvKbxVl475ob90g-944CPDgjIU3sQYAzOD0Wcr2me1meh2x-UvfmIzatIbZPRCaLwD9tpW0M_XpbNvXwWaZgsHt2EXz2-SWAZ1ONDvvkJ7M7pLvXWZSy0y6ymjNTIrMpDUzqWUmNcykLTOxfs1MusXM53RCt3hJu7ykNS_vkcXpy_mLKTNnfbDUd8YlC5x0hHvgPlhVrhf7PvdcRyQicTloEO6LMFUufIYC5ggqTETsOmkghkHiB44KxfA-2cvyTD4kdCSdkScdX3A09v2Ec6lCngo-dnkiXNUnB804R2ud0yXCWJwQ5hJhnzh25KPUpMnH01ouojbBN2IYAYYRYhgN--RZ8xPb3jWVn1o4I5DkuD0XZzKvNhH-Ux6EHnf75IHGuWnOcqRPBhb4yAiizXV9HRlutJXLj98-icvLJJKeTp3l8kd_7O6A3Gzfxsdkrywq-QSM8DI5JPuT05OTs8Oa-j8BTtDevg
linkProvider Springer Nature
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reproductive+outcomes+in+women+with+prior+cesarean+section+undergoing+in+vitro+fertilization%3A+A+retrospective+case-control+study&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+Huazhong+University+of+Science+and+Technology.+Medical+sciences&rft.au=Wang%2C+Ya-Qin&rft.au=Yin%2C+Tai-Lang&rft.au=Xu%2C+Wang-Min&rft.au=Qi%2C+Qian-Rong&rft.date=2017-12-01&rft.issn=1672-0733&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=922&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs11596-017-1828-3&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F29270754&rft.externalDocID=29270754
thumbnail_s http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=http%3A%2F%2Fimage.cqvip.com%2Fvip1000%2Fqk%2F85740A%2F85740A.jpg
http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wanfangdata.com.cn%2Fimages%2FPeriodicalImages%2Ftjykdxxb-e%2Ftjykdxxb-e.jpg