Development of a Core Critical Care Data Dictionary With Common Data Elements to Characterize Critical Illness and Injuries Using a Modified Delphi Method

• Published in: Critical care medicine Vol. 53; no. 5; p. e1045
• Main Authors: Murphy, David J, Anderson, Wesley, Heavner, Smith H, Al-Hakim, Tamara, Cruz-Cano, Raul, Laudanski, Krzysztof, Kamaleswaran, Rishikesan, Badawi, Omar, Engel, Heidi, Grunwell, Jocelyn, Herasevich, Vitaly, Khanna, Ashish K, Lamb, Keith, MacLaren, Robert, Rincon, Teresa, Sanchez-Pinto, Lazaro, Sikora, Andrea N, Stevens, Robert D, Tanner, Donna, Teeter, William, Wong, An-Kwok Ian, Wynn, James L, Zhang, Xiaohan T, Zimmerman, Jerry J, Kumar, Vishakha, Cobb, J Perren, Reuter-Rice, Karin E
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.05.2025
• Subjects: Common Data Elements; Consensus; Critical Care - statistics & numerical data; Critical Illness - therapy; Delphi Technique; Female; Humans; Wounds and Injuries - therapy; common data elements; standard definitions; neonates; intensive care; adult; pediatric
• ISSN: 1530-0293; 0090-3493; 1530-0293
• DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006595

To develop the first core Critical Care Data Dictionary (C2D2) with common data elements (CDEs) to characterize critical illness and injuries. Group consensus process using modified Delphi approach. Electronic surveys and in-person meetings. A multidisciplinary workgroup of clinicians and researchers with expertise in the care of the critically ill and injured. The Delphi process was divided into domain and CDE portions with each composed of two item generation rounds and one item reduction/refinement rounds. Two in-person meetings augmented this process to facilitate review and consideration of the domains and by panel members. The final set of domains and CDEs was then reviewed by the group to meet the competing criteria of utility and feasibility, resulting in the core dataset. The 23-member Delphi panel was provided 1833 candidate variables for potential dataset inclusion. The final dataset includes 226 patient-level CDCs in nine domains, which include anthropometrics and demographics (8), chronic comorbid illnesses (18), advanced directives (1), ICU diagnoses (61), diagnostic tests (42), interventions (27), medications (38), objective assessments (26), and hospital course and outcomes (5). Upon final review, 91% of the panel endorsed the CDCs as meeting criteria for a minimum viable data dictionary. Data elements cross the lifespan of neonate through adult patients. The resulting C2D2 provides a foundation to facilitate rapid collection, analyses, and dissemination of information necessary for research, quality improvement, and clinical practice to optimize critical care outcomes. Further work is needed to validate the effectiveness of the dataset in a variety of critical care settings.