Impact of standardized tobacco packaging on smoking-related behaviors and perceptions in Singapore

Singapore phased in standardized tobacco packaging on 1 July 2020 following a three-month grace period. This pre-post study evaluated its impacts on smoking-related behaviors and perceptions among adults who currently smoke. Baseline and follow-up data were collected in a pre- and post-questionnaire...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTobacco induced diseases Vol. 22; no. August; pp. 1 - 12
Main Authors Ng, Lionel, Tan, Chuen Seng, Lee‡, Jeong Kyu, van der Eijk‡, Yvette
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Greece European Publishing on behalf of the International Society for the Prevention of Tobacco Induced Diseases (ISPTID) 01.08.2024
European Publishing
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1617-9625
2070-7266
1617-9625
DOI10.18332/tid/189551

Cover

Abstract Singapore phased in standardized tobacco packaging on 1 July 2020 following a three-month grace period. This pre-post study evaluated its impacts on smoking-related behaviors and perceptions among adults who currently smoke. Baseline and follow-up data were collected in a pre- and post-questionnaire from a cohort of 1873 Singaporean adults who were currently smoking at baseline. Baseline data were collected from December 2019 to May 2020, and follow-up data from July 2021 to September 2021. We used descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses to assess pre-post changes (Bhapkar's test, Wilcoxon signed rank test) and to identify characteristics of participants who had quit or cut down smoking at follow-up (Pearson's chi-squared, Fisher's exact test). At follow-up, 11.7% (n=220) had quit smoking. There was a higher proportion of those smoking non-daily (pre: 13.1%, post: 16.9%; p<0.001), and those intending to quit within the next year (pre: 14.8%, post: 17.5%; p<0.05) or six months (pre: 10.4%, post: 13.2%; p<0.01). Tobacco products were scored more negatively in relation to packaging, quality, satisfaction, value for money and overall appeal (scores pre: 15.9, post: 14.3; p<0.001), harmfulness (scores pre: 0.61, post: 0.54; p<0.05), noticing others smoking the same brand (scores pre: 1.92, post: 1.65; p<0.001), and considering quitting due to health warnings (scores pre: 0.81, post: 0.86, p<0.05). Fewer reported that some cigarette brands have higher prestige (pre: 58.0, post: 54.3%; p<0.01), and more reported using flavored cigarettes (pre: 42.2%, post: 60.1%; p<0.001) and e-cigarettes (pre: 4.2%, post: 6.1%; p<0.01). In Singapore, the changes observed before and after the implementation of standardized packaging suggest that it might be associated with quit-related outcomes, reduced tobacco product appeal, and increased effectiveness of graphic health warnings.
AbstractList Singapore phased in standardized tobacco packaging on 1 July 2020 following a three-month grace period. This pre-post study evaluated its impacts on smoking-related behaviors and perceptions among adults who currently smoke.INTRODUCTIONSingapore phased in standardized tobacco packaging on 1 July 2020 following a three-month grace period. This pre-post study evaluated its impacts on smoking-related behaviors and perceptions among adults who currently smoke.Baseline and follow-up data were collected in a pre- and post-questionnaire from a cohort of 1873 Singaporean adults who were currently smoking at baseline. Baseline data were collected from December 2019 to May 2020, and follow-up data from July 2021 to September 2021. We used descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses to assess pre-post changes (Bhapkar's test, Wilcoxon signed rank test) and to identify characteristics of participants who had quit or cut down smoking at follow-up (Pearson's chi-squared, Fisher's exact test).METHODSBaseline and follow-up data were collected in a pre- and post-questionnaire from a cohort of 1873 Singaporean adults who were currently smoking at baseline. Baseline data were collected from December 2019 to May 2020, and follow-up data from July 2021 to September 2021. We used descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses to assess pre-post changes (Bhapkar's test, Wilcoxon signed rank test) and to identify characteristics of participants who had quit or cut down smoking at follow-up (Pearson's chi-squared, Fisher's exact test).At follow-up, 11.7% (n=220) had quit smoking. There was a higher proportion of those smoking non-daily (pre: 13.1%, post: 16.9%; p<0.001), and those intending to quit within the next year (pre: 14.8%, post: 17.5%; p<0.05) or six months (pre: 10.4%, post: 13.2%; p<0.01). Tobacco products were scored more negatively in relation to packaging, quality, satisfaction, value for money and overall appeal (scores pre: 15.9, post: 14.3; p<0.001), harmfulness (scores pre: 0.61, post: 0.54; p<0.05), noticing others smoking the same brand (scores pre: 1.92, post: 1.65; p<0.001), and considering quitting due to health warnings (scores pre: 0.81, post: 0.86, p<0.05). Fewer reported that some cigarette brands have higher prestige (pre: 58.0, post: 54.3%; p<0.01), and more reported using flavored cigarettes (pre: 42.2%, post: 60.1%; p<0.001) and e-cigarettes (pre: 4.2%, post: 6.1%; p<0.01).RESULTSAt follow-up, 11.7% (n=220) had quit smoking. There was a higher proportion of those smoking non-daily (pre: 13.1%, post: 16.9%; p<0.001), and those intending to quit within the next year (pre: 14.8%, post: 17.5%; p<0.05) or six months (pre: 10.4%, post: 13.2%; p<0.01). Tobacco products were scored more negatively in relation to packaging, quality, satisfaction, value for money and overall appeal (scores pre: 15.9, post: 14.3; p<0.001), harmfulness (scores pre: 0.61, post: 0.54; p<0.05), noticing others smoking the same brand (scores pre: 1.92, post: 1.65; p<0.001), and considering quitting due to health warnings (scores pre: 0.81, post: 0.86, p<0.05). Fewer reported that some cigarette brands have higher prestige (pre: 58.0, post: 54.3%; p<0.01), and more reported using flavored cigarettes (pre: 42.2%, post: 60.1%; p<0.001) and e-cigarettes (pre: 4.2%, post: 6.1%; p<0.01).In Singapore, the changes observed before and after the implementation of standardized packaging suggest that it might be associated with quit-related outcomes, reduced tobacco product appeal, and increased effectiveness of graphic health warnings.CONCLUSIONSIn Singapore, the changes observed before and after the implementation of standardized packaging suggest that it might be associated with quit-related outcomes, reduced tobacco product appeal, and increased effectiveness of graphic health warnings.
Introduction Singapore phased in standardized tobacco packaging on 1 July 2020 following a three-month grace period. This pre-post study evaluated its impacts on smoking-related behaviors and perceptions among adults who currently smoke. Methods Baseline and follow-up data were collected in a pre- and post-questionnaire from a cohort of 1873 Singaporean adults who were currently smoking at baseline. Baseline data were collected from December 2019 to May 2020, and followup data from July 2021 to September 2021. We used descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses to assess pre-post changes (Bhapkar’s test, Wilcoxon signed rank test) and to identify characteristics of participants who had quit or cut down smoking at follow-up (Pearson’s chi-squared, Fisher’s exact test). Results At follow-up, 11.7% (n=220) had quit smoking. There was a higher proportion of those smoking non-daily (pre: 13.1%, post: 16.9%; p<0.001), and those intending to quit within the next year (pre: 14.8%, post: 17.5%; p<0.05) or six months (pre: 10.4%, post: 13.2%; p<0.01). Tobacco products were scored more negatively in relation to packaging, quality, satisfaction, value for money and overall appeal (scores pre: 15.9, post: 14.3; p<0.001), harmfulness (scores pre: 0.61, post: 0.54; p<0.05), noticing others smoking the same brand (scores pre: 1.92, post: 1.65; p<0.001), and considering quitting due to health warnings (scores pre: 0.81, post: 0.86, p<0.05). Fewer reported that some cigarette brands have higher prestige (pre: 58.0, post: 54.3%; p<0.01), and more reported using flavored cigarettes (pre: 42.2%, post: 60.1%; p<0.001) and e-cigarettes (pre: 4.2%, post: 6.1%; p<0.01). Conclusions In Singapore, the changes observed before and after the implementation of standardized packaging suggest that it might be associated with quit-related outcomes, reduced tobacco product appeal, and increased effectiveness of graphic health warnings.
Singapore phased in standardized tobacco packaging on 1 July 2020 following a three-month grace period. This pre-post study evaluated its impacts on smoking-related behaviors and perceptions among adults who currently smoke. Baseline and follow-up data were collected in a pre- and post-questionnaire from a cohort of 1873 Singaporean adults who were currently smoking at baseline. Baseline data were collected from December 2019 to May 2020, and follow-up data from July 2021 to September 2021. We used descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses to assess pre-post changes (Bhapkar's test, Wilcoxon signed rank test) and to identify characteristics of participants who had quit or cut down smoking at follow-up (Pearson's chi-squared, Fisher's exact test). At follow-up, 11.7% (n=220) had quit smoking. There was a higher proportion of those smoking non-daily (pre: 13.1%, post: 16.9%; p<0.001), and those intending to quit within the next year (pre: 14.8%, post: 17.5%; p<0.05) or six months (pre: 10.4%, post: 13.2%; p<0.01). Tobacco products were scored more negatively in relation to packaging, quality, satisfaction, value for money and overall appeal (scores pre: 15.9, post: 14.3; p<0.001), harmfulness (scores pre: 0.61, post: 0.54; p<0.05), noticing others smoking the same brand (scores pre: 1.92, post: 1.65; p<0.001), and considering quitting due to health warnings (scores pre: 0.81, post: 0.86, p<0.05). Fewer reported that some cigarette brands have higher prestige (pre: 58.0, post: 54.3%; p<0.01), and more reported using flavored cigarettes (pre: 42.2%, post: 60.1%; p<0.001) and e-cigarettes (pre: 4.2%, post: 6.1%; p<0.01). In Singapore, the changes observed before and after the implementation of standardized packaging suggest that it might be associated with quit-related outcomes, reduced tobacco product appeal, and increased effectiveness of graphic health warnings.
Author Ng, Lionel
Tan, Chuen Seng
van der Eijk‡, Yvette
Lee‡, Jeong Kyu
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Lionel
  surname: Ng
  fullname: Ng, Lionel
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Chuen Seng
  surname: Tan
  fullname: Tan, Chuen Seng
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Jeong Kyu
  orcidid: 0000-0001-5534-7640
  surname: Lee‡
  fullname: Lee‡, Jeong Kyu
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Yvette
  orcidid: 0000-0002-8095-1214
  surname: van der Eijk‡
  fullname: van der Eijk‡, Yvette
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39091892$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpVkrtvFDEQhy0URB5Q0SOXSGiJ37uuEIp4nBSJAqitWXv24mTPXuy9SOGvx8qFKKk88nzzTTG_U3KUckJC3nL2kQ9SivM1hnM-WK35C3LCDe87a4Q-elIfk9NarxnTA1f8FTmWltk2IU7IuNkt4FeaJ1pXSAFKiH8x0DWP4H2mrXkD25i2NCdad_mmlV3BGdYGjXgFtzGXStskXbB4XNaYU6Ux0Z-NhCUXfE1eTjBXfPPwnpHfX7_8uvjeXf74trn4fNl5xczamUmHQXKruNVCKKWhF5oBeoPKcs7ReGvHYA2MvZJGerQwBSYHL4RHQHlGNgdvyHDtlhJ3UO5chujuP3LZOihr9DM6blD2theCGVAT2BGNMjIYybC3avLN9engWvbjDoPHtBaYn0mfd1K8ctt86zgXVhimmuH9g6HkP3usq9vF6nGeIWHeVyfZ0EtttLENffd02eOW_1dqwIcD4EuuteD0iHDm7jPgWgbcIQPyH__spSg
Cites_doi 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052050
10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051979
10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051509
10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052058
10.18332/tid/146600
10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-054988
10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054011
10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005836
10.1111/dar.12331
10.1111/add.12183
10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-056324
10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053030
10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.03.025
10.1093/eurpub/ckaa053
10.1111/j.1360-0443.1989.tb03059.x
10.1080/14622200310001649469
10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054573
10.1093/ntr/ntab027
10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051880
10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056635
10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056792
10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052084
10.34172/ijhpm.2021.25
10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i73
10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.037
10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003175
10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02145.x
10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056694
10.5694/mja13.11070
10.2105/AJPH.2005.083527
10.1093/ntr/nty158
10.1111/add.13536
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2024 Ng L. et al.
2024 Ng L. et al. 2024
Copyright_xml – notice: 2024 Ng L. et al.
– notice: 2024 Ng L. et al. 2024
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.18332/tid/189551
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic

PubMed
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 1617-9625
EndPage 12
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_16e37972206a4fa9be6463d630e794fc
PMC11292604
39091892
10_18332_tid_189551
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
123
29Q
2WC
4.4
53G
5VS
6PF
7X7
8C1
AAWTL
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACHQT
ACIHN
ACPRK
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
AEAQA
AENEX
AFKRA
AFRAH
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
ATCPS
BAWUL
BBNVY
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BHPHI
BMC
BPHCQ
C6C
CITATION
CS3
DIK
E3Z
EBD
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HCIFZ
HYE
IAO
IEA
IHR
INH
INR
KQ8
M0K
M48
M7P
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PIMPY
PROAC
RNS
RPM
RSV
SMD
SOJ
TR2
TUS
UKHRP
XSB
~8M
2VQ
7X2
8FE
8FH
8FI
8FJ
ADUKV
AEUYN
AHSBF
AOIJS
BVXVI
CCPQU
EBS
EJD
H13
HMCUK
IHW
IPNFZ
ITC
LK8
NPM
PHGZT
PQQKQ
RIG
ROL
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-6f5d8319419522445a7250aec6e49111e6c99bd96ab74363ce9afd038c22ceae3
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 1617-9625
2070-7266
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:31:42 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:33:52 EDT 2025
Thu Sep 04 20:38:46 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:00:19 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:45:22 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue August
Keywords tobacco policy
plain packaging
adult smokers
tobacco marketing
tobacco packaging
Language English
License 2024 Ng L. et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c406t-6f5d8319419522445a7250aec6e49111e6c99bd96ab74363ce9afd038c22ceae3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Joint senior authors
ORCID 0000-0002-8095-1214
0000-0001-5534-7640
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.18332/tid/189551
PMID 39091892
PQID 3087356569
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 12
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_16e37972206a4fa9be6463d630e794fc
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11292604
proquest_miscellaneous_3087356569
pubmed_primary_39091892
crossref_primary_10_18332_tid_189551
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2024-08-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-08-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2024
  text: 2024-08-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Greece
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Greece
PublicationTitle Tobacco induced diseases
PublicationTitleAlternate Tob Induc Dis
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher European Publishing on behalf of the International Society for the Prevention of Tobacco Induced Diseases (ISPTID)
European Publishing
Publisher_xml – name: European Publishing on behalf of the International Society for the Prevention of Tobacco Induced Diseases (ISPTID)
– name: European Publishing
References ref-1193770
ref-1193792
ref-1193771
ref-1193793
ref-1193772
ref-1193773
ref-1193790
ref-1193791
ref-1193767
ref-1193789
ref-1193768
ref-1193769
ref-1193763
ref-1193785
ref-1193764
ref-1193786
ref-1193765
ref-1193787
ref-1193766
ref-1193788
ref-1193781
ref-1193760
ref-1193782
ref-1193761
ref-1193783
ref-1193762
ref-1193784
ref-1193780
ref-1193778
ref-1193779
ref-1193758
ref-1193759
ref-1193774
ref-1193775
ref-1193776
ref-1193777
References_xml – ident: ref-1193779
– ident: ref-1193764
  doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052050
– ident: ref-1193761
  doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051979
– ident: ref-1193788
  doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051509
– ident: ref-1193768
  doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052058
– ident: ref-1193769
  doi: 10.18332/tid/146600
– ident: ref-1193776
  doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-054988
– ident: ref-1193786
  doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054011
– ident: ref-1193762
  doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005836
– ident: ref-1193771
  doi: 10.1111/dar.12331
– ident: ref-1193784
  doi: 10.1111/add.12183
– ident: ref-1193760
  doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-056324
– ident: ref-1193790
  doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053030
– ident: ref-1193758
– ident: ref-1193767
  doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.03.025
– ident: ref-1193763
  doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa053
– ident: ref-1193780
  doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1989.tb03059.x
– ident: ref-1193789
  doi: 10.1080/14622200310001649469
– ident: ref-1193774
  doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054573
– ident: ref-1193765
  doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntab027
– ident: ref-1193777
  doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051880
– ident: ref-1193770
  doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056635
– ident: ref-1193792
  doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056792
– ident: ref-1193775
  doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052084
– ident: ref-1193793
  doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.25
– ident: ref-1193783
  doi: 10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i73
– ident: ref-1193782
  doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.037
– ident: ref-1193766
  doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003175
– ident: ref-1193785
  doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02145.x
– ident: ref-1193772
  doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056694
– ident: ref-1193773
  doi: 10.5694/mja13.11070
– ident: ref-1193781
  doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.083527
– ident: ref-1193791
  doi: 10.1093/ntr/nty158
– ident: ref-1193759
– ident: ref-1193778
– ident: ref-1193787
  doi: 10.1111/add.13536
SSID ssj0058141
Score 2.30222
Snippet Singapore phased in standardized tobacco packaging on 1 July 2020 following a three-month grace period. This pre-post study evaluated its impacts on...
Introduction Singapore phased in standardized tobacco packaging on 1 July 2020 following a three-month grace period. This pre-post study evaluated its impacts...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 1
SubjectTerms adult smokers
plain packaging
Research Paper
tobacco marketing
tobacco packaging
tobacco policy
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LS8QwEA7iyYsovuqLCHsttpkkTY4qigp6UcFbSdIpLmIr7nrx1ztpt6srghevTUrDfJPMN-k8GBuBUJWWBaTGeRcdlDw1FdrUFw5V0J6sTryHvLnVlw_y-lE9fmv1FWPC-vLAveCOc41Q2EKITDtZO-tRSw2VhgxJleoQT9_MZoMz1Z_ByuQyn2XjGQBxPCVkc2OVyhfsT1em_zdu-TNE8pvNuVhjqzOyyE_6Ra6zJWw2mL_qEht5W_PhHmD8gRWPOzOEltPgc9d6iLcNn7y08S487VJWaNKQlT_h9CZ__Ypq4eOG38X22MTHcZM9XJzfn12ms04JaSCDPE11rSpDm0nmlviUlMoVRG0cBo0ynmaog7W-stp5YgwaAlpXVxmYIERAh7DFlpu2wR3GC6Vq4oRYOwESnbcZVAEKT8wOPJg6YaNBfuVrXxCjjI5EFHNJYi57MSfsNMp2PiVWse4eELblDNvyL2wTdjQgU5LWx18ZrsH2fVLGOoYQuahN2HaP1PxTYIkDGSsSZhYwXFjL4kgzfuoqa0fySQ6e3P2P1e-xFUEMqI8W3GfL07d3PCAGM_WHnbJ-Ar-g8OU
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
Title Impact of standardized tobacco packaging on smoking-related behaviors and perceptions in Singapore
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39091892
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3087356569
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11292604
https://doaj.org/article/16e37972206a4fa9be6463d630e794fc
Volume 22
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1Lb9QwELaqcuGCQLwCtDJSr4Fdj-3YB4QAtSpIcIGVeotsZwIrICm7Wwk49Lcz4yQLW_XAJYfYVpKZjOeb8TyEOAJlGqsrKF2IgQ2Ueeka9GWsAppkI2kd9kO-_2BPF_rdmTnbE1MzzpGA62tNO-4ntVh9e_bzx6-XJPAvWOAdgHq-Ib7NnTecSn0jHxRxDJ_eHicYN7SwZCxfekL8Y6LelcU7qilX8L8Odl6NnvxHHZ3cFrdGHClfDYy_I_awuyvi25zzKPtWTi6C5W9sJAttSr2kwa-5K5HsO7n-3rObvMzZLDRpSthfS1opz_8GvMhlJz9y52yiEt4Ti5PjT29Oy7GJQplIV29K25rGkZzpuSeopbUJFaGegMmi5o0ObfI-Nt6GSGDCQkIf2mYGLimVMCDcF_td3-FDIStjWoKL2AYFGkP0M2gSVJFAH0RwbSGOJvrV50OtjJptDCZzTWSuBzIX4jXTdjuFC1znG_3qcz3KSz23CJWvlJrZoNvgI1ptobEwQ9pB2lSIpxNnahIIPuUIHfYX65pLHALDVF-IBwOnto8CT_DIeVUIt8PDnXfZHemWX3LRbcalZPvpR__3kY_FTUXwZwgVfCL2N6sLPCD4somH2ew_zD8oXy-P_wBRlPGn
linkProvider Scholars Portal
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact+of+standardized+tobacco+packaging+on+smoking-related+behaviors+and+perceptions+in+Singapore&rft.jtitle=Tobacco+induced+diseases&rft.au=Ng%2C+Lionel&rft.au=Tan%2C+Chuen+Seng&rft.au=Lee%E2%80%A1%2C+Jeong+Kyu&rft.au=van+der+Eijk%E2%80%A1%2C+Yvette&rft.date=2024-08-01&rft.issn=1617-9625&rft.eissn=1617-9625&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=August&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=12&rft_id=info:doi/10.18332%2Ftid%2F189551&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_18332_tid_189551
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1617-9625&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1617-9625&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1617-9625&client=summon