Medically refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease in the obese: what is the best surgical approach?

Background Obesity is a recognized risk factor for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Traditional antireflux surgery (fundoplication) may not be appropriate in the morbidly obese, especially when other effective alternatives exist (bariatric surgery). Methods A 13-item survey was designed to el...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSurgical endoscopy Vol. 28; no. 5; pp. 1500 - 1504
Main Authors Pagé, Maurice-Pierre, Kastenmeier, Andrew, Goldblatt, Matthew, Frelich, Matthew, Bosler, Matthew, Wallace, James, Gould, Jon
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Boston Springer US 01.05.2014
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0930-2794
1432-2218
1432-2218
DOI10.1007/s00464-013-3343-3

Cover

Abstract Background Obesity is a recognized risk factor for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Traditional antireflux surgery (fundoplication) may not be appropriate in the morbidly obese, especially when other effective alternatives exist (bariatric surgery). Methods A 13-item survey was designed to elicit professional opinions regarding the treatment of medically refractory GERD in obese patients. Members of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) were randomly selected and emailed a link to an online survey. Results A total of 550 surgeons were contacted via email, and 92 (17 %) completed the survey. Of the respondents, 88 % perform laparoscopic antireflux surgery, 63 % perform bariatric surgery, and 59 % perform both. Overall, 77 % completed a minimally invasive surgery fellowship. In response to the question “Would you perform a laparoscopic fundoplication in a patient with medically refractory GERD and a BMI of ‘X’?” surgeons were less likely to offer fundoplication at a higher body mass index (BMI). The majority of respondents felt that laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was the best option (91 %), followed by laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (6 %). Many had a morbidly obese patient with a primary surgical indication of GERD denied a bariatric procedure by their insurance company (57 %), and 35 % of those surgeons chose to do nothing rather than subject the patient to a fundoplication. Respondents uniformly felt that bariatric surgery should be recognized as a standard surgical option for treating GERD in the obese (96 %). Conclusion When surgical treatment of GERD is indicated in an obese patient, bariatric surgery is the optimal approach, in the opinion of surgeons responding to our survey. Unfortunately, third-party payers often decline to provide benefits for a bariatric procedure for this indication. Additional data is necessary to confirm our belief that the opinions elicited through this survey are consistent with the standard of care as defined by the medical community.
AbstractList Background Obesity is a recognized risk factor for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Traditional antireflux surgery (fundoplication) may not be appropriate in the morbidly obese, especially when other effective alternatives exist (bariatric surgery). Methods A 13-item survey was designed to elicit professional opinions regarding the treatment of medically refractory GERD in obese patients. Members of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) were randomly selected and emailed a link to an online survey. Results A total of 550 surgeons were contacted via email, and 92 (17 %) completed the survey. Of the respondents, 88 % perform laparoscopic antireflux surgery, 63 % perform bariatric surgery, and 59 % perform both. Overall, 77 % completed a minimally invasive surgery fellowship. In response to the question “Would you perform a laparoscopic fundoplication in a patient with medically refractory GERD and a BMI of ‘X’?” surgeons were less likely to offer fundoplication at a higher body mass index (BMI). The majority of respondents felt that laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was the best option (91 %), followed by laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (6 %). Many had a morbidly obese patient with a primary surgical indication of GERD denied a bariatric procedure by their insurance company (57 %), and 35 % of those surgeons chose to do nothing rather than subject the patient to a fundoplication. Respondents uniformly felt that bariatric surgery should be recognized as a standard surgical option for treating GERD in the obese (96 %). Conclusion When surgical treatment of GERD is indicated in an obese patient, bariatric surgery is the optimal approach, in the opinion of surgeons responding to our survey. Unfortunately, third-party payers often decline to provide benefits for a bariatric procedure for this indication. Additional data is necessary to confirm our belief that the opinions elicited through this survey are consistent with the standard of care as defined by the medical community.
Background: Obesity is a recognized risk factor for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Traditional antireflux surgery (fundoplication) may not be appropriate in the morbidly obese, especially when other effective alternatives exist (bariatric surgery). Methods: A 13-item survey was designed to elicit professional opinions regarding the treatment of medically refractory GERD in obese patients. Members of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) were randomly selected and emailed a link to an online survey. Results: A total of 550 surgeons were contacted via email, and 92 (17 %) completed the survey. Of the respondents, 88 % perform laparoscopic antireflux surgery, 63 % perform bariatric surgery, and 59 % perform both. Overall, 77 % completed a minimally invasive surgery fellowship. In response to the question "Would you perform a laparoscopic fundoplication in a patient with medically refractory GERD and a BMI of 'X'?" surgeons were less likely to offer fundoplication at a higher body mass index (BMI). The majority of respondents felt that laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was the best option (91 %), followed by laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (6 %). Many had a morbidly obese patient with a primary surgical indication of GERD denied a bariatric procedure by their insurance company (57 %), and 35 % of those surgeons chose to do nothing rather than subject the patient to a fundoplication. Respondents uniformly felt that bariatric surgery should be recognized as a standard surgical option for treating GERD in the obese (96 %). Conclusion: When surgical treatment of GERD is indicated in an obese patient, bariatric surgery is the optimal approach, in the opinion of surgeons responding to our survey. Unfortunately, third-party payers often decline to provide benefits for a bariatric procedure for this indication. Additional data is necessary to confirm our belief that the opinions elicited through this survey are consistent with the standard of care as defined by the medical community.
Obesity is a recognized risk factor for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Traditional antireflux surgery (fundoplication) may not be appropriate in the morbidly obese, especially when other effective alternatives exist (bariatric surgery).BACKGROUNDObesity is a recognized risk factor for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Traditional antireflux surgery (fundoplication) may not be appropriate in the morbidly obese, especially when other effective alternatives exist (bariatric surgery).A 13-item survey was designed to elicit professional opinions regarding the treatment of medically refractory GERD in obese patients. Members of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) were randomly selected and emailed a link to an online survey.METHODSA 13-item survey was designed to elicit professional opinions regarding the treatment of medically refractory GERD in obese patients. Members of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) were randomly selected and emailed a link to an online survey.A total of 550 surgeons were contacted via email, and 92 (17 %) completed the survey. Of the respondents, 88 % perform laparoscopic antireflux surgery, 63 % perform bariatric surgery, and 59 % perform both. Overall, 77 % completed a minimally invasive surgery fellowship. In response to the question "Would you perform a laparoscopic fundoplication in a patient with medically refractory GERD and a BMI of 'X'?" surgeons were less likely to offer fundoplication at a higher body mass index (BMI). The majority of respondents felt that laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was the best option (91 %), followed by laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (6 %). Many had a morbidly obese patient with a primary surgical indication of GERD denied a bariatric procedure by their insurance company (57 %), and 35 % of those surgeons chose to do nothing rather than subject the patient to a fundoplication. Respondents uniformly felt that bariatric surgery should be recognized as a standard surgical option for treating GERD in the obese (96 %).RESULTSA total of 550 surgeons were contacted via email, and 92 (17 %) completed the survey. Of the respondents, 88 % perform laparoscopic antireflux surgery, 63 % perform bariatric surgery, and 59 % perform both. Overall, 77 % completed a minimally invasive surgery fellowship. In response to the question "Would you perform a laparoscopic fundoplication in a patient with medically refractory GERD and a BMI of 'X'?" surgeons were less likely to offer fundoplication at a higher body mass index (BMI). The majority of respondents felt that laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was the best option (91 %), followed by laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (6 %). Many had a morbidly obese patient with a primary surgical indication of GERD denied a bariatric procedure by their insurance company (57 %), and 35 % of those surgeons chose to do nothing rather than subject the patient to a fundoplication. Respondents uniformly felt that bariatric surgery should be recognized as a standard surgical option for treating GERD in the obese (96 %).When surgical treatment of GERD is indicated in an obese patient, bariatric surgery is the optimal approach, in the opinion of surgeons responding to our survey. Unfortunately, third-party payers often decline to provide benefits for a bariatric procedure for this indication. Additional data is necessary to confirm our belief that the opinions elicited through this survey are consistent with the standard of care as defined by the medical community.CONCLUSIONWhen surgical treatment of GERD is indicated in an obese patient, bariatric surgery is the optimal approach, in the opinion of surgeons responding to our survey. Unfortunately, third-party payers often decline to provide benefits for a bariatric procedure for this indication. Additional data is necessary to confirm our belief that the opinions elicited through this survey are consistent with the standard of care as defined by the medical community.
Obesity is a recognized risk factor for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Traditional antireflux surgery (fundoplication) may not be appropriate in the morbidly obese, especially when other effective alternatives exist (bariatric surgery). A 13-item survey was designed to elicit professional opinions regarding the treatment of medically refractory GERD in obese patients. Members of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) were randomly selected and emailed a link to an online survey. A total of 550 surgeons were contacted via email, and 92 (17 %) completed the survey. Of the respondents, 88 % perform laparoscopic antireflux surgery, 63 % perform bariatric surgery, and 59 % perform both. Overall, 77 % completed a minimally invasive surgery fellowship. In response to the question "Would you perform a laparoscopic fundoplication in a patient with medically refractory GERD and a BMI of 'X'?" surgeons were less likely to offer fundoplication at a higher body mass index (BMI). The majority of respondents felt that laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was the best option (91 %), followed by laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (6 %). Many had a morbidly obese patient with a primary surgical indication of GERD denied a bariatric procedure by their insurance company (57 %), and 35 % of those surgeons chose to do nothing rather than subject the patient to a fundoplication. Respondents uniformly felt that bariatric surgery should be recognized as a standard surgical option for treating GERD in the obese (96 %). When surgical treatment of GERD is indicated in an obese patient, bariatric surgery is the optimal approach, in the opinion of surgeons responding to our survey. Unfortunately, third-party payers often decline to provide benefits for a bariatric procedure for this indication. Additional data is necessary to confirm our belief that the opinions elicited through this survey are consistent with the standard of care as defined by the medical community.
Obesity is a recognized risk factor for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Traditional antireflux surgery (fundoplication) may not be appropriate in the morbidly obese, especially when other effective alternatives exist (bariatric surgery). A 13-item survey was designed to elicit professional opinions regarding the treatment of medically refractory GERD in obese patients. Members of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) were randomly selected and emailed a link to an online survey. A total of 550 surgeons were contacted via email, and 92 (17 %) completed the survey. Of the respondents, 88 % perform laparoscopic antireflux surgery, 63 % perform bariatric surgery, and 59 % perform both. Overall, 77 % completed a minimally invasive surgery fellowship. In response to the question "Would you perform a laparoscopic fundoplication in a patient with medically refractory GERD and a BMI of 'X'?" surgeons were less likely to offer fundoplication at a higher body mass index (BMI). The majority of respondents felt that laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was the best option (91 %), followed by laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (6 %). Many had a morbidly obese patient with a primary surgical indication of GERD denied a bariatric procedure by their insurance company (57 %), and 35 % of those surgeons chose to do nothing rather than subject the patient to a fundoplication. Respondents uniformly felt that bariatric surgery should be recognized as a standard surgical option for treating GERD in the obese (96 %). When surgical treatment of GERD is indicated in an obese patient, bariatric surgery is the optimal approach, in the opinion of surgeons responding to our survey. Unfortunately, third-party payers often decline to provide benefits for a bariatric procedure for this indication. Additional data is necessary to confirm our belief that the opinions elicited through this survey are consistent with the standard of care as defined by the medical community.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
Author Bosler, Matthew
Pagé, Maurice-Pierre
Goldblatt, Matthew
Gould, Jon
Kastenmeier, Andrew
Wallace, James
Frelich, Matthew
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Maurice-Pierre
  surname: Pagé
  fullname: Pagé, Maurice-Pierre
  organization: Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Andrew
  surname: Kastenmeier
  fullname: Kastenmeier, Andrew
  organization: Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Matthew
  surname: Goldblatt
  fullname: Goldblatt, Matthew
  organization: Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Matthew
  surname: Frelich
  fullname: Frelich, Matthew
  organization: Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Matthew
  surname: Bosler
  fullname: Bosler, Matthew
  organization: Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin
– sequence: 6
  givenname: James
  surname: Wallace
  fullname: Wallace, James
  organization: Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Jon
  surname: Gould
  fullname: Gould, Jon
  email: jgould@mcw.edu
  organization: Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24310740$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkU1v1DAQhi1URLeFH8AFWeLCJTATO3HCBaGKL6mIC5yjiTPZdZWNF9sR7L_HYQtClYCLLc0873y9F-Js9jML8RjhOQKYFxFA17oAVIVSOj_3xAa1KouyxOZMbKBVUJSm1efiIsYbyHiL1QNxXmqFYDRsxPiRB2dpmo4y8BjIJh-OcksxBc_RH3a0ZZrW3LR8l4OLTJGlm2XasfQ9R34pv-0oSRd_hnIkybiE7VpU0uEQPNndq4fi_khT5Ee3_6X48vbN56v3xfWndx-uXl8XVkOVilFVfa01VqbvEUYmhAGNrg1XQ95l1GNNNRsgYEWqGYbRWsqEGbCntrHqUjw71c19vy55lm7vouVpopn9EjtsWqMMNk3zf7TCWgOUekWf3kFv_BLmvMhKVaVGNCpTT26ppd_z0B2C21M4dr-OnQE8ATb4GPNJfyMI3WpodzK0y4Z2q6HdWtTc0ViXKDk_p0Bu-qeyPClj7jJvOfwx9F9FPwAZerOd
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cireng_2023_11_008
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bpg_2014_07_012
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11894_019_0709_2
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_016_4989_4
crossref_primary_10_1111_nyas_13104
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cgh_2019_08_019
crossref_primary_10_1089_lap_2019_0218
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11695_021_05465_z
crossref_primary_10_1080_17474124_2016_1179576
crossref_primary_10_1089_bari_2018_0018
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ciresp_2023_02_004
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_014_2656_4
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11695_022_06401_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2015_04_034
crossref_primary_10_1111_apt_15295
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11695_014_1470_0
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_019_07231_w
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11894_017_0582_9
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12262_021_02774_6
crossref_primary_10_1080_00015458_2015_11681110
crossref_primary_10_1590_s0004_2803_201800000_39
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tgie_2015_02_009
crossref_primary_10_1089_bari_2021_0122
Cites_doi 10.1001/jama.2012.39
10.1007/s11605-009-0837-3
10.1007/s00464-007-9490-7
10.1053/j.gastro.2005.12.016
10.1001/archsurg.141.3.247
10.1007/s11695-008-9474-2
10.1097/MEG.0b013e328332f7b8
10.1097/00000441-200311000-00002
10.7326/0003-4819-143-3-200508020-00006
10.1007/s00464-011-1961-1
10.1007/s00464-011-1851-6
10.1016/j.soard.2010.09.011
10.1007/s00464-005-0031-y
10.3748/wjg.v16.i30.3757
10.1007/s00464-003-8118-9
10.1381/096089298765555024
10.1016/j.soard.2008.08.021
10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bdff20
10.1016/j.soard.2010.08.012
10.1007/s00464-001-8313-5
10.1016/j.thorsurg.2011.08.004
10.1001/jama.292.14.1724
10.1016/S0039-6109(05)70184-5
10.1007/s00464-001-9225-0
10.1007/s00464-010-1487-y
10.1007/s004640090119
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.02.088
10.1007/s004640000392
10.1007/s11894-011-0191-y
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41703.x
10.3310/hta17220
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013
Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014
Copyright_xml – notice: Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013
– notice: Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7RV
7X7
7XB
88E
8AO
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
BENPR
CCPQU
FYUFA
GHDGH
K9.
KB0
M0S
M1P
NAPCQ
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
7TS
DOI 10.1007/s00464-013-3343-3
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals - PSU access expires 11/30/25.
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Pharma Collection
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Medical Database
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
Physical Education Index
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
Physical Education Index
DatabaseTitleList
Physical Education Index
MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1432-2218
EndPage 1504
ExternalDocumentID 3272942341
24310740
10_1007_s00464_013_3343_3
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations United States--US
GeographicLocations_xml – name: United States--US
GroupedDBID ---
-53
-5E
-5G
-BR
-EM
-Y2
-~C
.86
.GJ
.VR
06C
06D
0R~
0VY
123
199
1N0
1SB
203
28-
29Q
29~
2J2
2JN
2JY
2KG
2KM
2LR
2P1
2VQ
2~H
30V
36B
3V.
4.4
406
408
409
40D
40E
53G
5QI
5RE
5VS
67Z
6NX
6PF
78A
7RV
7X7
88E
8AO
8FI
8FJ
8TC
8UJ
95-
95.
95~
96X
AAAVM
AABHQ
AACDK
AAHNG
AAIAL
AAJBT
AAJKR
AANXM
AANZL
AAQQT
AARHV
AARTL
AASML
AATNV
AATVU
AAUYE
AAWCG
AAWTL
AAYIU
AAYQN
AAYTO
AAYZH
ABAKF
ABBBX
ABBXA
ABDZT
ABECU
ABFTV
ABHLI
ABHQN
ABIPD
ABJNI
ABJOX
ABKCH
ABKTR
ABLJU
ABMNI
ABMQK
ABNWP
ABOCM
ABPLI
ABQSL
ABSXP
ABTEG
ABTKH
ABTMW
ABULA
ABUWG
ABWNU
ABXPI
ACAOD
ACBXY
ACDTI
ACGFS
ACHSB
ACHVE
ACHXU
ACKNC
ACMDZ
ACMLO
ACOKC
ACOMO
ACPIV
ACUDM
ACZOJ
ADBBV
ADHHG
ADHIR
ADIMF
ADINQ
ADJJI
ADKNI
ADKPE
ADRFC
ADTPH
ADURQ
ADYFF
ADZKW
AEBTG
AEFIE
AEFQL
AEGAL
AEGNC
AEJHL
AEJRE
AEKMD
AEMSY
AENEX
AEOHA
AEPYU
AESKC
AETLH
AEVLU
AEXYK
AFBBN
AFEXP
AFJLC
AFKRA
AFLOW
AFQWF
AFZKB
AGAYW
AGDGC
AGGDS
AGJBK
AGMZJ
AGQEE
AGQMX
AGRTI
AGVAE
AGWIL
AGWZB
AGYKE
AHAVH
AHBYD
AHIZS
AHMBA
AHSBF
AHYZX
AIAKS
AIGIU
AIIXL
AILAN
AITGF
AJBLW
AJRNO
AJZVZ
AKMHD
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALWAN
AMKLP
AMXSW
AMYLF
AMYQR
AOCGG
ARMRJ
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXYYD
AZFZN
B-.
BA0
BBWZM
BDATZ
BENPR
BGNMA
BKEYQ
BPHCQ
BSONS
BVXVI
CAG
CCPQU
COF
CS3
CSCUP
DDRTE
DL5
DNIVK
DPUIP
DU5
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EIOEI
EJD
EMB
EMOBN
EN4
ESBYG
EX3
F5P
FERAY
FFXSO
FIGPU
FINBP
FNLPD
FRRFC
FSGXE
FWDCC
FYUFA
G-Y
G-Z
GGCAI
GGRSB
GJIRD
GNWQR
GQ6
GQ7
GQ8
GRRUI
GXS
H13
HF~
HG5
HG6
HMCUK
HMJXF
HQYDN
HRMNR
HZ~
I09
IHE
IJ-
IKXTQ
IMOTQ
ITM
IWAJR
IXC
IZIGR
IZQ
I~X
I~Z
J-C
J0Z
JBSCW
JCJTX
JZLTJ
KDC
KOV
KOW
KPH
L7B
LAS
LLZTM
M1P
M4Y
MA-
N2Q
N9A
NAPCQ
NB0
NDZJH
NPVJJ
NQJWS
NU0
O9-
O93
O9G
O9I
O9J
OAM
P19
P9S
PF0
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PT4
PT5
Q2X
QOK
QOR
QOS
R4E
R89
R9I
RHV
RIG
RNI
ROL
RPX
RRX
RSV
RZK
S16
S1Z
S26
S27
S28
S37
S3B
SAP
SCLPG
SDE
SDH
SDM
SHX
SISQX
SJYHP
SMD
SNE
SNPRN
SNX
SOHCF
SOJ
SPISZ
SRMVM
SSLCW
SSXJD
STPWE
SV3
SZ9
SZN
T13
T16
TSG
TSK
TSV
TT1
TUC
U2A
U9L
UG4
UKHRP
UOJIU
UTJUX
UZXMN
VC2
VFIZW
W23
W48
WH7
WJK
WK8
WOW
YLTOR
Z45
Z7U
Z7X
Z82
Z83
Z87
Z88
Z8O
Z8R
Z8V
Z8W
Z91
Z92
ZMTXR
ZOVNA
~EX
AAPKM
AAYXX
ABBRH
ABDBE
ABFSG
ACSTC
ADHKG
AEZWR
AFDZB
AFHIU
AFOHR
AGQPQ
AHPBZ
AHWEU
AIXLP
ATHPR
AYFIA
CITATION
PHGZM
PHGZT
ABRTQ
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PJZUB
PPXIY
7XB
8FK
K9.
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
PUEGO
7TS
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-f35b644157bb10fea10d17467e5d930f4f6a6e70a0e3a38ddfccad177d1ba98c3
IEDL.DBID 7X7
ISSN 0930-2794
1432-2218
IngestDate Thu Sep 04 18:17:41 EDT 2025
Thu Sep 04 22:03:20 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 03:24:22 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:05:51 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:05:12 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 00:24:34 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 21 02:35:38 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 5
Keywords Fundoplication
GERD
Survey
Morbid obesity
Gastric bypass
Language English
License http://www.springer.com/tdm
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c405t-f35b644157bb10fea10d17467e5d930f4f6a6e70a0e3a38ddfccad177d1ba98c3
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 24310740
PQID 1515241173
PQPubID 31812
PageCount 5
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1897371888
proquest_miscellaneous_1516400248
proquest_journals_1515241173
pubmed_primary_24310740
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_013_3343_3
crossref_citationtrail_10_1007_s00464_013_3343_3
springer_journals_10_1007_s00464_013_3343_3
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2014-05-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2014-05-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 05
  year: 2014
  text: 2014-05-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Boston
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Boston
– name: Germany
– name: New York
PublicationSubtitle And Other Interventional Techniques Official Journal of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) and European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES)
PublicationTitle Surgical endoscopy
PublicationTitleAbbrev Surg Endosc
PublicationTitleAlternate Surg Endosc
PublicationYear 2014
Publisher Springer US
Springer Nature B.V
Publisher_xml – name: Springer US
– name: Springer Nature B.V
References Ibele, Garren, Gould (CR29) 2012; 26
Chisholm, Jamieson, Lally, Devitt, Game, Watson (CR14) 2009; 13
Al Harakeh, Burkhamer, Kallies, Mathiason, Kothari (CR28) 2010; 6
Mejía-Rivas, Herrera-López, Hernández-Calleros, Herrera, Valdovinos (CR4) 2008; 18
Sugerman (CR18) 2001; 81
Vivek, Prachand, Alverdy (CR31) 2010; 16
Frezza, Ikrasmuddin, Gourash, Rakitt, Kingston, Luketich, Schauer (CR9) 2002; 16
Pandolfino, El-Serag, Zhang, Shah, Ghosh, Kahrilas (CR17) 2006; 130
Flegal, Carroll, Kit, Ogden (CR1) 2012; 307
Iovino, Angrisani, Tremolaterra, Nirchio, Ciannella, Borrelli, Sabbatini, Mazzacca, Ciacci (CR24) 2002; 16
Shaheen, Provenzale (CR5) 2003; 326
Chiu, Birch, Shi, Sharma, Karmali (CR23) 2011; 7
Musunuru, Gould (CR16) 2012; 26
Morgenthal, Lin, Shane, Hunter, Smith (CR8) 2007; 21
Madalosso, Gurski, Callegari-Jacques, Navarini, Thiesen, Fornari (CR3) 2010; 251
Jones (CR21) 1998; 8
Grant, Boachie, Cotton, Faria, Bojke, Epstein, Ramsay, Corbacho, Sculpher, Krukowski, Heading, Campbell (CR6) 2013; 17
Tutuian (CR22) 2011; 13
Reavis (CR30) 2011; 21
Winslow, Frisella, Soper, Klingensmith (CR13) 2003; 17
Perez, Moncure, Rattner (CR10) 2001; 15
Fornari, Madalosso, Farré, Gurski, Thiesen, Callegari-Jacquese (CR19) 2010; 22
Varela, Hinojosa, Nguyen (CR27) 2009; 5
Awais, Luketich, Schuchert, Morse, Wilson, Gooding, Landreneau, Pennathur (CR15) 2011; 92
Gould, Ellsmere, Fanelli, Hutter, Jones, Pratt, Schauer, Schirmer, Schwaitzberg, Jones (CR32) 2011; 25
Colquitt, Picot, Loveman, Clegg (CR7) 2009; 15
Anvari, Bamehriz (CR12) 2006; 20
Hampel, Abraham, El-Serag (CR2) 2005; 143
El-Serag, Graham, Satia, Rabeneck (CR20) 2005; 100
Hahnloser, Schumacher, Calvin, Cosendey, Petropoulos (CR11) 2002; 16
Klaus, Gruber, Wetscher, Nehoda, Aigner, Peer, Margreiter, Weiss (CR25) 2006; 141
Buchwald, Avidor, Braunwald, Jensen, Pories, Fahrbach, Schoelles (CR26) 2004; 292
C Morgenthal (3343_CR8) 2007; 21
CA Madalosso (3343_CR3) 2010; 251
KB Jones (3343_CR21) 1998; 8
S Musunuru (3343_CR16) 2012; 26
N Shaheen (3343_CR5) 2003; 326
AR Perez (3343_CR10) 2001; 15
H Hampel (3343_CR2) 2005; 143
MA Mejía-Rivas (3343_CR4) 2008; 18
HB El-Serag (3343_CR20) 2005; 100
JA Chisholm (3343_CR14) 2009; 13
HJ Sugerman (3343_CR18) 2001; 81
JE Varela (3343_CR27) 2009; 5
M Anvari (3343_CR12) 2006; 20
A Ibele (3343_CR29) 2012; 26
D Hahnloser (3343_CR11) 2002; 16
KM Reavis (3343_CR30) 2011; 21
ER Winslow (3343_CR13) 2003; 17
AM Grant (3343_CR6) 2013; 17
JE Pandolfino (3343_CR17) 2006; 130
A Klaus (3343_CR25) 2006; 141
S Chiu (3343_CR23) 2011; 7
JL Colquitt (3343_CR7) 2009; 15
H Buchwald (3343_CR26) 2004; 292
P Iovino (3343_CR24) 2002; 16
F Fornari (3343_CR19) 2010; 22
R Tutuian (3343_CR22) 2011; 13
J Gould (3343_CR32) 2011; 25
AB Al Harakeh (3343_CR28) 2010; 6
N Vivek (3343_CR31) 2010; 16
O Awais (3343_CR15) 2011; 92
KM Flegal (3343_CR1) 2012; 307
EE Frezza (3343_CR9) 2002; 16
15929752 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Jun;100(6):1243-50
19370590 - Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;(2):CD003641
19259752 - J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Jun;13(6):1064-70
16549689 - Arch Surg. 2006 Mar;141(3):247-51
21802068 - Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Sep;92(3):1083-9; discussion 1089-90
22052421 - Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar;26(3):838-42
9562484 - Obes Surg. 1998 Feb;8(1):35-8
12073000 - Surg Endosc. 2002 Nov;16(11):1631-5
21858578 - Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan;26(1):177-81
16341568 - Surg Endosc. 2006 Feb;20(2):230-4
20698037 - World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Aug 14;16(30):3757-61
21130052 - Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011 Jul-Aug;7(4):510-5
20110819 - Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Apr;22(4):404-11
14577029 - Surg Endosc. 2003 Dec;17(12):2003-11
20010088 - Ann Surg. 2010 Feb;251(2):244-8
18996768 - Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009 Mar-Apr;5(2):139-43
17623236 - Surg Endosc. 2007 Nov;21(11):1978-84
22040631 - Thorac Surg Clin. 2011 Nov;21(4):489-98
15479938 - JAMA. 2004 Oct 13;292(14):1724-37
22253363 - JAMA. 2012 Feb 1;307(5):491-7
21424733 - Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2011 Jun;13(3):205-12
11443428 - Surg Endosc. 2001 Sep;15(9):986-9
11984683 - Surg Endosc. 2002 Jul;16(7):1027-31
11961603 - Surg Endosc. 2002 Jan;16(1):43-7
16530504 - Gastroenterology. 2006 Mar;130(3):639-49
14615667 - Am J Med Sci. 2003 Nov;326(5):264-73
21111379 - Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010 Nov-Dec;6(6):591-6
21136099 - Surg Endosc. 2011 Jun;25(6):1730-40
23742987 - Health Technol Assess. 2013 Jun;17 (22):1-167
18512110 - Obes Surg. 2008 Oct;18(10):1217-24
11589245 - Surg Clin North Am. 2001 Oct;81(5):1063-75, vi
16061918 - Ann Intern Med. 2005 Aug 2;143(3):199-211
References_xml – volume: 307
  start-page: 491
  issue: 5
  year: 2012
  end-page: 497
  ident: CR1
  article-title: Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among US adults, 1999–2010
  publication-title: JAMA
  doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.39
– volume: 13
  start-page: 1064
  issue: 6
  year: 2009
  end-page: 1070
  ident: CR14
  article-title: The effect of obesity on the outcome of laparoscopic antireflux surgery
  publication-title: J Gastrointest Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-0837-3
– volume: 21
  start-page: 1978
  issue: 11
  year: 2007
  end-page: 1984
  ident: CR8
  article-title: Who will fail laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication? Preoperative prediction of long-term outcomes
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
  doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9490-7
– volume: 130
  start-page: 639
  year: 2006
  end-page: 649
  ident: CR17
  article-title: Obesity: a challenge to esophagogastric junction integrity
  publication-title: Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.12.016
– volume: 17
  start-page: 1
  issue: 22
  year: 2013
  end-page: 167
  ident: CR6
  article-title: Clinical and economic evaluation of laparoscopic surgery compared with medical management for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: 5-year follow-up of multicentre randomised trial (the REFLUX trial)
  publication-title: Health Technol Assess
– volume: 141
  start-page: 247
  year: 2006
  end-page: 251
  ident: CR25
  article-title: Prevalent esophageal body motility disorders underlie aggravation of GERD symptoms in morbidly obese patients following adjustable gastric banding
  publication-title: Arch Surg
  doi: 10.1001/archsurg.141.3.247
– volume: 18
  start-page: 1217
  issue: 10
  year: 2008
  end-page: 1224
  ident: CR4
  article-title: Gastroesophageal reflux disease in morbid obesity: the effect of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
  publication-title: Obes Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s11695-008-9474-2
– volume: 22
  start-page: 404
  year: 2010
  end-page: 411
  ident: CR19
  article-title: The role of gastro-oesophageal pressure gradient and sliding hiatal hernia on pathological gastro-oesophageal reflux in severely obese patients
  publication-title: Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol
  doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e328332f7b8
– volume: 326
  start-page: 264
  year: 2003
  end-page: 273
  ident: CR5
  article-title: The epidemiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease
  publication-title: Am J Med Sci
  doi: 10.1097/00000441-200311000-00002
– volume: 143
  start-page: 199
  issue: 3
  year: 2005
  end-page: 211
  ident: CR2
  article-title: Meta-analysis: obesity and the risk for gastroesophageal reflux disease and its complications
  publication-title: Ann Intern Med
  doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-143-3-200508020-00006
– volume: 26
  start-page: 838
  year: 2012
  end-page: 842
  ident: CR16
  article-title: Perioperative outcomes of surgical procedures for symptomatic fundoplication failure: a retrospective case-control study
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
  doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1961-1
– volume: 26
  start-page: 177
  issue: 1
  year: 2012
  end-page: 181
  ident: CR29
  article-title: The impact of previous fundoplication on laparoscopic gastric bypass outcomes: a case-control evaluation
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
  doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1851-6
– volume: 7
  start-page: 510
  issue: 4
  year: 2011
  end-page: 515
  ident: CR23
  article-title: Effect of sleeve gastrectomy on gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review
  publication-title: Surg Obes Relat Dis
  doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2010.09.011
– volume: 20
  start-page: 230
  issue: 2
  year: 2006
  end-page: 234
  ident: CR12
  article-title: Outcome of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication in patients with body mass index ≥35
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
  doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0031-y
– volume: 16
  start-page: 3757
  issue: 30
  year: 2010
  end-page: 3761
  ident: CR31
  article-title: Gastroesophageal reflux disease and severe obesity: fundoplication or bariatric surgery?
  publication-title: World J Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i30.3757
– volume: 17
  start-page: 2003
  year: 2003
  end-page: 2011
  ident: CR13
  article-title: Obesity does not adversely affect the outcome of laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS)
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
  doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8118-9
– volume: 8
  start-page: 35
  year: 1998
  end-page: 38
  ident: CR21
  article-title: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: an effective antireflux procedure in the less than morbidly obese
  publication-title: Obes Surg
  doi: 10.1381/096089298765555024
– volume: 5
  start-page: 139
  year: 2009
  end-page: 143
  ident: CR27
  article-title: Laparoscopic fundoplication compared with laparoscopic gastric bypass in morbidly obese patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease
  publication-title: Surg Obes Relat Dis
  doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2008.08.021
– volume: 251
  start-page: 244
  issue: 2
  year: 2010
  end-page: 248
  ident: CR3
  article-title: The impact of gastric bypass on gastroesophageal reflux disease in patients with morbid obesity: a prospective study based on the Montreal Consensus
  publication-title: Ann Surg
  doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bdff20
– volume: 6
  start-page: 591
  issue: 6
  year: 2010
  end-page: 596
  ident: CR28
  article-title: Natural history and metabolic consequences of morbid obesity for patients denied coverage for bariatric surgery
  publication-title: Surg Obes Relat Dis
  doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2010.08.012
– volume: 16
  start-page: 1027
  year: 2002
  end-page: 1031
  ident: CR9
  article-title: Symptomatic improvement in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
  doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-8313-5
– volume: 15
  start-page: CD003641
  issue: 2
  year: 2009
  ident: CR7
  article-title: Surgery for obesity
  publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
– volume: 21
  start-page: 489
  issue: 4
  year: 2011
  end-page: 498
  ident: CR30
  article-title: Management of the obese patient with gastroesophageal reflux disease
  publication-title: Thorac Surg Clin
  doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2011.08.004
– volume: 292
  start-page: 1724
  issue: 14
  year: 2004
  end-page: 1737
  ident: CR26
  article-title: Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: JAMA
  doi: 10.1001/jama.292.14.1724
– volume: 81
  start-page: 1063
  issue: 5
  year: 2001
  end-page: 2001
  ident: CR18
  article-title: Effects of increased intra-abdominal pressure in severe obesity
  publication-title: Surg Clin North Am
  doi: 10.1016/S0039-6109(05)70184-5
– volume: 16
  start-page: 1631
  year: 2002
  end-page: 1635
  ident: CR24
  article-title: Abnormal esophageal acid exposure is common in morbidly obese patients and improves after a successful Lap-band system implantation
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
  doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-9225-0
– volume: 25
  start-page: 1730
  issue: 6
  year: 2011
  end-page: 1740
  ident: CR32
  article-title: Panel report: best practices for the surgical treatment of obesity
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
  doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1487-y
– volume: 16
  start-page: 43
  year: 2002
  end-page: 47
  ident: CR11
  article-title: Risk factors for complications of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
  doi: 10.1007/s004640090119
– volume: 92
  start-page: 1083
  issue: 3
  year: 2011
  end-page: 1089
  ident: CR15
  article-title: Reoperative antireflux surgery for failed fundoplication: an analysis of outcomes in 275 patients
  publication-title: Ann Thorac Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.02.088
– volume: 15
  start-page: 986
  year: 2001
  end-page: 989
  ident: CR10
  article-title: Obesity adversely affects the outcome of antireflux operations
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
  doi: 10.1007/s004640000392
– volume: 13
  start-page: 205
  issue: 3
  year: 2011
  end-page: 212
  ident: CR22
  article-title: Obesity and GERD: pathophysiology and effect of bariatric surgery
  publication-title: Curr Gastroenterol Rep
  doi: 10.1007/s11894-011-0191-y
– volume: 100
  start-page: 1243
  year: 2005
  end-page: 1250
  ident: CR20
  article-title: Obesity is an independent risk factor for GERD symptoms and erosive esophagitis
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41703.x
– volume: 6
  start-page: 591
  issue: 6
  year: 2010
  ident: 3343_CR28
  publication-title: Surg Obes Relat Dis
  doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2010.08.012
– volume: 16
  start-page: 1631
  year: 2002
  ident: 3343_CR24
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
  doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-9225-0
– volume: 20
  start-page: 230
  issue: 2
  year: 2006
  ident: 3343_CR12
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
  doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0031-y
– volume: 13
  start-page: 1064
  issue: 6
  year: 2009
  ident: 3343_CR14
  publication-title: J Gastrointest Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-0837-3
– volume: 18
  start-page: 1217
  issue: 10
  year: 2008
  ident: 3343_CR4
  publication-title: Obes Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s11695-008-9474-2
– volume: 81
  start-page: 1063
  issue: 5
  year: 2001
  ident: 3343_CR18
  publication-title: Surg Clin North Am
  doi: 10.1016/S0039-6109(05)70184-5
– volume: 17
  start-page: 1
  issue: 22
  year: 2013
  ident: 3343_CR6
  publication-title: Health Technol Assess
  doi: 10.3310/hta17220
– volume: 16
  start-page: 43
  year: 2002
  ident: 3343_CR11
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
  doi: 10.1007/s004640090119
– volume: 292
  start-page: 1724
  issue: 14
  year: 2004
  ident: 3343_CR26
  publication-title: JAMA
  doi: 10.1001/jama.292.14.1724
– volume: 15
  start-page: CD003641
  issue: 2
  year: 2009
  ident: 3343_CR7
  publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
– volume: 5
  start-page: 139
  year: 2009
  ident: 3343_CR27
  publication-title: Surg Obes Relat Dis
  doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2008.08.021
– volume: 130
  start-page: 639
  year: 2006
  ident: 3343_CR17
  publication-title: Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.12.016
– volume: 326
  start-page: 264
  year: 2003
  ident: 3343_CR5
  publication-title: Am J Med Sci
  doi: 10.1097/00000441-200311000-00002
– volume: 15
  start-page: 986
  year: 2001
  ident: 3343_CR10
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
  doi: 10.1007/s004640000392
– volume: 8
  start-page: 35
  year: 1998
  ident: 3343_CR21
  publication-title: Obes Surg
  doi: 10.1381/096089298765555024
– volume: 17
  start-page: 2003
  year: 2003
  ident: 3343_CR13
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
  doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8118-9
– volume: 307
  start-page: 491
  issue: 5
  year: 2012
  ident: 3343_CR1
  publication-title: JAMA
  doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.39
– volume: 22
  start-page: 404
  year: 2010
  ident: 3343_CR19
  publication-title: Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol
  doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e328332f7b8
– volume: 26
  start-page: 177
  issue: 1
  year: 2012
  ident: 3343_CR29
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
  doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1851-6
– volume: 251
  start-page: 244
  issue: 2
  year: 2010
  ident: 3343_CR3
  publication-title: Ann Surg
  doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bdff20
– volume: 21
  start-page: 1978
  issue: 11
  year: 2007
  ident: 3343_CR8
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
  doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9490-7
– volume: 7
  start-page: 510
  issue: 4
  year: 2011
  ident: 3343_CR23
  publication-title: Surg Obes Relat Dis
  doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2010.09.011
– volume: 16
  start-page: 1027
  year: 2002
  ident: 3343_CR9
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
  doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-8313-5
– volume: 26
  start-page: 838
  year: 2012
  ident: 3343_CR16
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
  doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1961-1
– volume: 25
  start-page: 1730
  issue: 6
  year: 2011
  ident: 3343_CR32
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
  doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1487-y
– volume: 100
  start-page: 1243
  year: 2005
  ident: 3343_CR20
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41703.x
– volume: 141
  start-page: 247
  year: 2006
  ident: 3343_CR25
  publication-title: Arch Surg
  doi: 10.1001/archsurg.141.3.247
– volume: 143
  start-page: 199
  issue: 3
  year: 2005
  ident: 3343_CR2
  publication-title: Ann Intern Med
  doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-143-3-200508020-00006
– volume: 13
  start-page: 205
  issue: 3
  year: 2011
  ident: 3343_CR22
  publication-title: Curr Gastroenterol Rep
  doi: 10.1007/s11894-011-0191-y
– volume: 21
  start-page: 489
  issue: 4
  year: 2011
  ident: 3343_CR30
  publication-title: Thorac Surg Clin
  doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2011.08.004
– volume: 92
  start-page: 1083
  issue: 3
  year: 2011
  ident: 3343_CR15
  publication-title: Ann Thorac Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.02.088
– volume: 16
  start-page: 3757
  issue: 30
  year: 2010
  ident: 3343_CR31
  publication-title: World J Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i30.3757
– reference: 18996768 - Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009 Mar-Apr;5(2):139-43
– reference: 17623236 - Surg Endosc. 2007 Nov;21(11):1978-84
– reference: 22040631 - Thorac Surg Clin. 2011 Nov;21(4):489-98
– reference: 19370590 - Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;(2):CD003641
– reference: 16341568 - Surg Endosc. 2006 Feb;20(2):230-4
– reference: 21858578 - Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan;26(1):177-81
– reference: 22052421 - Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar;26(3):838-42
– reference: 9562484 - Obes Surg. 1998 Feb;8(1):35-8
– reference: 20110819 - Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Apr;22(4):404-11
– reference: 11961603 - Surg Endosc. 2002 Jan;16(1):43-7
– reference: 15479938 - JAMA. 2004 Oct 13;292(14):1724-37
– reference: 14577029 - Surg Endosc. 2003 Dec;17(12):2003-11
– reference: 21111379 - Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010 Nov-Dec;6(6):591-6
– reference: 18512110 - Obes Surg. 2008 Oct;18(10):1217-24
– reference: 11984683 - Surg Endosc. 2002 Jul;16(7):1027-31
– reference: 16549689 - Arch Surg. 2006 Mar;141(3):247-51
– reference: 23742987 - Health Technol Assess. 2013 Jun;17 (22):1-167
– reference: 14615667 - Am J Med Sci. 2003 Nov;326(5):264-73
– reference: 11589245 - Surg Clin North Am. 2001 Oct;81(5):1063-75, vi
– reference: 22253363 - JAMA. 2012 Feb 1;307(5):491-7
– reference: 21136099 - Surg Endosc. 2011 Jun;25(6):1730-40
– reference: 19259752 - J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Jun;13(6):1064-70
– reference: 11443428 - Surg Endosc. 2001 Sep;15(9):986-9
– reference: 21802068 - Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Sep;92(3):1083-9; discussion 1089-90
– reference: 16061918 - Ann Intern Med. 2005 Aug 2;143(3):199-211
– reference: 20698037 - World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Aug 14;16(30):3757-61
– reference: 15929752 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Jun;100(6):1243-50
– reference: 12073000 - Surg Endosc. 2002 Nov;16(11):1631-5
– reference: 16530504 - Gastroenterology. 2006 Mar;130(3):639-49
– reference: 21424733 - Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2011 Jun;13(3):205-12
– reference: 21130052 - Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011 Jul-Aug;7(4):510-5
– reference: 20010088 - Ann Surg. 2010 Feb;251(2):244-8
SSID ssj0004915
Score 2.2164788
Snippet Background Obesity is a recognized risk factor for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Traditional antireflux surgery (fundoplication) may not be...
Obesity is a recognized risk factor for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Traditional antireflux surgery (fundoplication) may not be appropriate in the...
Background: Obesity is a recognized risk factor for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Traditional antireflux surgery (fundoplication) may not be...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
springer
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 1500
SubjectTerms Abdominal Surgery
Adult
Body Mass Index
Clinical Competence
Comorbidity
Decision Making
Drug Resistance
Endoscopy
Female
Fundoplication - methods
Gastric Bypass - methods
Gastroenterology
Gastroesophageal reflux
Gastroesophageal Reflux - complications
Gastroesophageal Reflux - drug therapy
Gastroesophageal Reflux - surgery
Gastrointestinal surgery
Gynecology
Hepatology
Humans
Laparoscopy
Laparoscopy - methods
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Obesity
Obesity, Morbid - complications
Obesity, Morbid - surgery
Patients
Proctology
Proton Pump Inhibitors - therapeutic use
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Surgeons
Surgery
Surveys and Questionnaires
Third party
Treatment Outcome
Weight control
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: SpringerLink Journals (ICM)
  dbid: U2A
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1LS8QwEA66gngR366uEsGTEmib9OVFFlEWYT25sLeStIkuLK30ge6_d5I-VFYXvPSQTEKYmcx8ZTIzCF3K0AW3wUMCFtIhzIsl4Z7PifbFjPk8jC2d4Dx-8kYT9jh1p00ed9G-dm9DksZSd8luJgpHdDcCShl81tGGq8tJgRJPnOFXMmRYty0IqUUc0LY2lPnbFj-d0RLCXIqOGqfzsIO2G7SIh7V4d9GaTPfQ5riJh-8j1cRZ5gsMm-emd84Cv_CizDOpGxSAtYD1MDevPnATjMGzFAPsw5mQhbzB76-8xLPCDMFIiYsqN-YQt_XGbw_Q5OH--W5Ems4JJAYAVhJFXaGBjusLYVtKcttKbN1YRLoJ8EUx5XFP-ha3JOU0SBIFggQKP7EFD4OYHqJemqXyGOFEqdB3mILfspjZ3BZuEjsAAkTCOdDLPrJaFkZxU1Zcd7eYR11BZMP1CLgeaa5HtI-uuiVvdU2NVcSDVi5Rc72KSKMwgB62D9MX3TRcDB3t4KnMKkPjMVOybQVNEPoUvHMANEe1zLsTOQCtAF9ZfXTdKsG3A_x13JN_UZ-iLQBgrH5AOUC9Mq_kGYCcUpwbpf4EI_TyJg
  priority: 102
  providerName: Springer Nature
Title Medically refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease in the obese: what is the best surgical approach?
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00464-013-3343-3
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24310740
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1515241173
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1516400248
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1897371888
Volume 28
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3fS-QwEB5OBfHluDt_3HoqOfBJCbZN2mzvRdZjPTlRRFxYn0raJCosrW67qP_9TdJ0vUNuX1pIJiVMkpmvmWQ-gH2dxug2ZErRQkaUJ4WmMhGSWl_MuZBpEdgLzheXydmI_x7HY7_hVvtjlZ1NdIZaVYXdIz-yjhe9TSjY8eMTtaxRNrrqKTSWYCVEJGKpG8RYvN2LTFsGA6yhEU68LqoZtElEE3v-glHGOD7-9UvvwOa7QKnzP6ef4KMHjmTQjvRn-KDLL7B64UPj62B8yGXySvDjU0ej80ruZN1MK225CtBwYHusm8xeiI_LkIeSIAIkVa5r_YM838uGPNSuCEsaUs-mzjKSLvX48QaMToc3P8-oJ1GgBWKxhhoW5xbzxCLPw8BoGQYqtBwjOlaoF8NNIhMtAhloJllfKYNjihJChblM-wXbhOWyKvVXIMqYVETc4B9awUMZ5rEqIsQDuZIS5XUPgk6FWeEzjFuii0k2z43stJ6h1jOr9Yz14GDe5LFNr7FIeKcbl8yvtDp7mxc9-D6vxjViAx-y1NXMySTcZW9bINNPBUNH3UeZrXbM5z2KEGUh1Ap6cNhNgr868L_ubi_u7jdYQ_DF28OTO7DcTGd6FwFOk--5WbwHK4Nft-dDfJ8ML6-usXQUDf4AtOL5ow
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1LT9wwEB7RRWq5oD5hgbau1F5aWXViJ9lUQqgP0FLYVVWBxC11YpsirRK6yQr2z_W3dew4SyvUvXHJIZlYzng88zljzwfwWqcRhg2ZUvSQIRVxoamME0ltLBYikWnB7AHn0TgenoqvZ9HZCvzuzsLYbZWdT3SOWlWF_Uf-3gZejDZBwvcuf1HLGmWzqx2FhvTUCmrXlRjzBzuO9PwKl3D17uEXHO83YXiwf_J5SD3LAC0QrDTU8Ci3oCBK8jxgRsuAqcCScOhIpZwZYWIZ64RJprnkA6UMfjRKJCrIZTooOLZ7D1aF_YHSg9VP--Nv329OZqYthwI2REM0_S6vytoyprHdAcIp5wIv_0bGW3D3VqrWRcCDh7DuoSv52NraI1jR5WO4P_LJ-SdgfNJnMifY-NQR-czJuaybaaUtWwK6Lnwfn01m18RnhshFSRCDkirXtf5Arn7KhlzU7hbeaUg9mzrfTLri53tP4fROFPwMemVV6k0gypg0CYXBNWIhAhnkkSpCRCS5khLldR9Yp8Ks8DXOLdXGJFtUZ3Zaz1DrmdV6xvvwdvHKZVvgY5nwTjcumZ_rdXZjmX14tXiMs9SmXmSpq5mTiYWrH7dEZpAmHKHCAGU22jFf9ChEnIdgj_XhXWcEf3Xgf93dWt7dl_BgeDI6zo4Px0fbsIZQULRbOXeg10xn-jnCrSZ_4W2awI-7nkZ_ACZrOjk
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Nb9QwEB2VVqq4IL7ZUsBIcAFZdWIn3iBVFdCuWkpXFaJSb6kT21BplbSbrMr-RX4VY8fZgir21ksOzsSyxp6Z54w9D-CNyRIMGyqj6CFjKtLSUJVKRV0sFkKqrGTugvPRON0_EV9Ok9MV-N3fhXHHKnuf6B21rkv3j3zLBV6MNpHkWzYcizjeHe1cXFLHIOUyrT2dhgo0C3rblxsLlzwOzfwKt3PN9sEuzv3bOB7tff-8TwPjAC0RuLTU8qRwACGRRRExa1TEdOQIOUyiM86ssKlKjWSKGa74UGuLCkAJqaNCZcOSY793YE1i1MeN4NqnvfHxt-tbmlnHp4Ad0RjNoM-xsq6kaepOg3DKucDHv1HyBvS9kbb10XB0H-4FGEs-duvuAayY6iGsH4VE_SOwIQE0mRPsfOpJfebkh2raaW0ccwK6Mfwe301mv0jIEpHziiAeJXVhGvOBXP1ULTlvfBO2tKSZTb2fJn0h9J3HcHIrCn4Cq1VdmWdAtLWZjIXF_WIpIhUViS5jRCeFVgrlzQBYr8K8DPXOHe3GJF9UavZaz1HrudN6zgfwbvHJRVfsY5nwZj8vebD7Jr9epQN4vXiNFuvSMKoy9czLpMLXklsiM8wkR9gwRJmn3ZwvRhQj5kPgxwbwvl8Efw3gf8PdWD7cV7CO5pR_PRgfPoe7iApFd6pzE1bb6cy8QOTVFi_DkiZwdttW9AcG0j59
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Medically+refractory+gastroesophageal+reflux+disease+in+the+obese%3A+what+is+the+best+surgical+approach%3F&rft.jtitle=Surgical+endoscopy&rft.au=Page%2C+Maurice-Pierre&rft.au=Kastenmeier%2C+Andrew&rft.au=Goldblatt%2C+Matthew&rft.au=Frelich%2C+Matthew&rft.date=2014-05-01&rft.issn=0930-2794&rft.eissn=1432-2218&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1500&rft.epage=1504&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs00464-013-3343-3&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0930-2794&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0930-2794&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0930-2794&client=summon