Clinical Follow-Up of Paclitaxel-Eluting (TAXUS™) Stents for the Treatment of Saphenous Vein Graft Disease
Background: Randomized trials in selected patient populations have demonstrated dramatic reductions in the incidence of in‐stent restenosis (ISR) following implantation of paclitaxel‐eluting (PE) coronary stents compared with bare metal stents in native coronary disease. The clinical outcome followi...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of interventional cardiology Vol. 20; no. 4; pp. 258 - 264 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Malden, USA
Blackwell Publishing Inc
01.08.2007
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0896-4327 1540-8183 |
DOI | 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2007.00268.x |
Cover
Abstract | Background:
Randomized trials in selected patient populations have demonstrated dramatic reductions in the incidence of in‐stent restenosis (ISR) following implantation of paclitaxel‐eluting (PE) coronary stents compared with bare metal stents in native coronary disease. The clinical outcome following implantation of PE stents for saphenous vein graft (SVG) stenosis is largely unknown.
Aim:
To assess the safety and efficacy of PE coronary stents for the treatment of SVG stenosis in an unselected population.
Methods:
All patients who received PE stents for the treatment of SVG disease from May 1, 2003, to May 1, 2005, were entered into a prospectively collected database. Fifty‐five patients were identified with 69 lesions. In‐hospital and late major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR) were recorded as well as the rate of target vessel revascularization (TVR).
Results:
Mean follow‐up was 13 months with 54 of the 55 patients contacted. The number of stents implanted was 1.12 ± 0.37 per lesion and 1.38 ± 0.59 per patient. Clinically significant procedural MACE was 0%. The late MACE rate was 9% with a 2% clinically driven TLR, a 4% coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), and a 4% TVR rate. There were four deaths, two cardiac and two noncardiac.
Conclusion:
PE stents appear safe and effective in the treatment of SVG disease at a mean follow‐up time of 13 months. Randomized studies are needed to further delineate the optimal management of this high‐risk group. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Background:
Randomized trials in selected patient populations have demonstrated dramatic reductions in the incidence of in‐stent restenosis (ISR) following implantation of paclitaxel‐eluting (PE) coronary stents compared with bare metal stents in native coronary disease. The clinical outcome following implantation of PE stents for saphenous vein graft (SVG) stenosis is largely unknown.
Aim:
To assess the safety and efficacy of PE coronary stents for the treatment of SVG stenosis in an unselected population.
Methods:
All patients who received PE stents for the treatment of SVG disease from May 1, 2003, to May 1, 2005, were entered into a prospectively collected database. Fifty‐five patients were identified with 69 lesions. In‐hospital and late major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR) were recorded as well as the rate of target vessel revascularization (TVR).
Results:
Mean follow‐up was 13 months with 54 of the 55 patients contacted. The number of stents implanted was 1.12 ± 0.37 per lesion and 1.38 ± 0.59 per patient. Clinically significant procedural MACE was 0%. The late MACE rate was 9% with a 2% clinically driven TLR, a 4% coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), and a 4% TVR rate. There were four deaths, two cardiac and two noncardiac.
Conclusion:
PE stents appear safe and effective in the treatment of SVG disease at a mean follow‐up time of 13 months. Randomized studies are needed to further delineate the optimal management of this high‐risk group. Randomized trials in selected patient populations have demonstrated dramatic reductions in the incidence of in-stent restenosis (ISR) following implantation of paclitaxel-eluting (PE) coronary stents compared with bare metal stents in native coronary disease. The clinical outcome following implantation of PE stents for saphenous vein graft (SVG) stenosis is largely unknown. To assess the safety and efficacy of PE coronary stents for the treatment of SVG stenosis in an unselected population. All patients who received PE stents for the treatment of SVG disease from May 1, 2003, to May 1, 2005, were entered into a prospectively collected database. Fifty-five patients were identified with 69 lesions. In-hospital and late major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR) were recorded as well as the rate of target vessel revascularization (TVR). Mean follow-up was 13 months with 54 of the 55 patients contacted. The number of stents implanted was 1.12 +/- 0.37 per lesion and 1.38 +/- 0.59 per patient. Clinically significant procedural MACE was 0%. The late MACE rate was 9% with a 2% clinically driven TLR, a 4% coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), and a 4% TVR rate. There were four deaths, two cardiac and two noncardiac. PE stents appear safe and effective in the treatment of SVG disease at a mean follow-up time of 13 months. Randomized studies are needed to further delineate the optimal management of this high-risk group. Randomized trials in selected patient populations have demonstrated dramatic reductions in the incidence of in-stent restenosis (ISR) following implantation of paclitaxel-eluting (PE) coronary stents compared with bare metal stents in native coronary disease. The clinical outcome following implantation of PE stents for saphenous vein graft (SVG) stenosis is largely unknown.BACKGROUNDRandomized trials in selected patient populations have demonstrated dramatic reductions in the incidence of in-stent restenosis (ISR) following implantation of paclitaxel-eluting (PE) coronary stents compared with bare metal stents in native coronary disease. The clinical outcome following implantation of PE stents for saphenous vein graft (SVG) stenosis is largely unknown.To assess the safety and efficacy of PE coronary stents for the treatment of SVG stenosis in an unselected population.AIMTo assess the safety and efficacy of PE coronary stents for the treatment of SVG stenosis in an unselected population.All patients who received PE stents for the treatment of SVG disease from May 1, 2003, to May 1, 2005, were entered into a prospectively collected database. Fifty-five patients were identified with 69 lesions. In-hospital and late major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR) were recorded as well as the rate of target vessel revascularization (TVR).METHODSAll patients who received PE stents for the treatment of SVG disease from May 1, 2003, to May 1, 2005, were entered into a prospectively collected database. Fifty-five patients were identified with 69 lesions. In-hospital and late major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR) were recorded as well as the rate of target vessel revascularization (TVR).Mean follow-up was 13 months with 54 of the 55 patients contacted. The number of stents implanted was 1.12 +/- 0.37 per lesion and 1.38 +/- 0.59 per patient. Clinically significant procedural MACE was 0%. The late MACE rate was 9% with a 2% clinically driven TLR, a 4% coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), and a 4% TVR rate. There were four deaths, two cardiac and two noncardiac.RESULTSMean follow-up was 13 months with 54 of the 55 patients contacted. The number of stents implanted was 1.12 +/- 0.37 per lesion and 1.38 +/- 0.59 per patient. Clinically significant procedural MACE was 0%. The late MACE rate was 9% with a 2% clinically driven TLR, a 4% coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), and a 4% TVR rate. There were four deaths, two cardiac and two noncardiac.PE stents appear safe and effective in the treatment of SVG disease at a mean follow-up time of 13 months. Randomized studies are needed to further delineate the optimal management of this high-risk group.CONCLUSIONPE stents appear safe and effective in the treatment of SVG disease at a mean follow-up time of 13 months. Randomized studies are needed to further delineate the optimal management of this high-risk group. |
Author | WILSON, S.H. ROY, P.R. BARON, D.W. FADDY, S.C. MULLER, D.W.M. RUCHIN, P.E. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: P.E. surname: RUCHIN fullname: RUCHIN, P.E. organization: Department of Cardiology, St. Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia – sequence: 2 givenname: S.C. surname: FADDY fullname: FADDY, S.C. organization: Department of Cardiology, St. Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia – sequence: 3 givenname: D.W.M. surname: MULLER fullname: MULLER, D.W.M. organization: Department of Cardiology, St. Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia – sequence: 4 givenname: D.W. surname: BARON fullname: BARON, D.W. organization: Department of Cardiology, St. Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia – sequence: 5 givenname: P.R. surname: ROY fullname: ROY, P.R. organization: Department of Cardiology, St. Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia – sequence: 6 givenname: S.H. surname: WILSON fullname: WILSON, S.H. organization: Department of Cardiology, St. Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17680855$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqNkcFu1DAQhi1URLeFV0A-ITgkOHYcOweQStouRRVF7C7lZjnJhHrxJovtVbf3PgmPxpPgsKVInOrLWOP_-8f65wDt9UMPCOGMpFk8r5dpxnOSyEyylBIiUkJoIdPtIzS5f9hDEyLLIskZFfvowPtlFBHO6RO0n4lCEsn5BNnKmt402uLTwdrhOlms8dDhT7qxJugt2OTEboLpv-GX86Ovi9mv25-v8CxAHzzuBofDFeC5Ax1WsTWSM72-gn7YePwFTI-nTncBHxsP2sNT9LjT1sOzu3qIFqcn8-p9cn4xPauOzpMmJ1wmQlIRa9cUFITOWcGyLivLhjNeS9qVsmWSsZzXbS47QqBthax5WQuqoanzlh2iFzvftRt-bMAHtTK-AWt1D_FnqpAZK-KUKHx-J9zUK2jV2pmVdjfqbz5RIHeCxg3eO-j-SYgaV6GWakxcjYmrcRXqzyrUNqJv_0ObmGgwQx-cNvYhBm92BtfGws2DB6sPF2dVvEU-2fHGB9je89p9V4VggqvLj1NVvcsvP-e0UFP2G0TcsRQ |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_4244_EIJV5I6A119 crossref_primary_10_1161_CIRCULATIONAHA_109_874057 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1540_8183_2010_00588_x crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1540_8183_2007_00341_x |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/S0003-4975(97)00057-X 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2006.00118.x 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.01.024 10.1161/01.CIR.0000069360.38675.22 10.1161/01.CIR.97.9.916 10.1016/0033-0620(91)90019-I 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.11.060 10.1016/0735-1097(96)00206-9 10.1161/01.CIR.0000079106.71097.1C 10.1002/ccd.20369 10.1177/096721099400200517 10.1161/01.CIR.91.7.1966 10.1067/mtc.2000.106983 10.1007/s00392-006-0460-1 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14462-5 10.1161/01.CIR.0000047700.58683.A1 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.03.084 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.09.021 10.1056/NEJM199709113371103 10.1161/01.CIR.0000012783.63093.0C 10.1016/S0022-5223(03)01276-5 10.1161/01.CIR.0000080894.51311.0A 10.1161/01.CIR.0000034045.36219.12 10.1161/01.CIR.0000127110.49192.72 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | BSCLL AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2007.00268.x |
DatabaseName | Istex CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1540-8183 |
EndPage | 264 |
ExternalDocumentID | 17680855 10_1111_j_1540_8183_2007_00268_x JOIC268 ark_67375_WNG_CB4WR426_G |
Genre | article Evaluation Studies Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | New South Wales |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: New South Wales |
GroupedDBID | --- .3N .GA .GJ .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1OB 24P 29K 31~ 36B 3SF 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52R 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 702 7PT 7X7 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8FI 8FJ 8UM 930 A01 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAMMB AANHP AAONW AAWTL AAZKR ABCQN ABDBF ABEML ABJNI ABOCM ABPVW ABUWG ACBWZ ACCMX ACGFS ACMXC ACPRK ACRPL ACSCC ACUHS ACXQS ACYXJ ADBBV ADEOM ADIZJ ADNMO AEFGJ AEIMD AENEX AFBPY AFEBI AFKRA AFZJQ AGQPQ AGXDD AHEFC AIDQK AIDYY AIQQE ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMBMR ASPBG ATUGU AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BCNDV BDRZF BENPR BHBCM BMXJE BPHCQ BPMNR BROTX BRXPI BSCLL BVXVI BY8 CAG CCPQU COF CS3 D-6 D-7 D-E D-F D-I DC6 DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DU5 EAD EAP EAS EBD EBS EJD EMB EMK EMOBN ENC EPT ESX EX3 F00 F01 F04 F5P FEDTE FUBAC FYUFA FZ0 G-S G.N GODZA GROUPED_DOAJ H.X HF~ HMCUK HVGLF HYE HZI HZ~ IAO IHE IHR INH ITC IX1 J0M K48 LC2 LC3 LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ O66 O9- OIG OK1 OVD P2W P2X P2Z P4B P4D PALCI PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PUEGO Q.N Q11 QB0 Q~Q R.K RIWAO RJQFR ROL RPM RX1 SAMSI SUPJJ SV3 TEORI TUS UB1 UKHRP W8V W99 WBKPD WHWMO WIH WIJ WIK WOHZO WOW WQJ WVDHM WXI WXSBR XG1 ZZTAW ~IA ~WT 1OC 33P AAHHS AAJEY ACCFJ AEEZP AEQDE AEUQT AFPWT AIWBW AJBDE ALIPV RHX WRC WUP AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c4058-7827058fc62e7a43631f199c535b82f98d383345bd48f00edd78b59b72aecb4d3 |
IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
ISSN | 0896-4327 |
IngestDate | Fri Sep 05 13:34:28 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:10:37 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:28:04 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:56:42 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:31:50 EST 2025 Sun Sep 21 06:20:11 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 4 |
Language | English |
License | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4058-7827058fc62e7a43631f199c535b82f98d383345bd48f00edd78b59b72aecb4d3 |
Notes | ArticleID:JOIC268 ark:/67375/WNG-CB4WR426-G istex:F8C656970A45E5701E7B117B5B42B39A1BF96EDA ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Undefined-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 |
PMID | 17680855 |
PQID | 68136782 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 7 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_68136782 pubmed_primary_17680855 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1540_8183_2007_00268_x crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_j_1540_8183_2007_00268_x wiley_primary_10_1111_j_1540_8183_2007_00268_x_JOIC268 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_CB4WR426_G |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2007-08 August 2007 2007-08-00 2007-Aug 20070801 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2007-08-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2007 text: 2007-08 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | Malden, USA |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Malden, USA – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Journal of interventional cardiology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Interv Cardiol |
PublicationYear | 2007 |
Publisher | Blackwell Publishing Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Blackwell Publishing Inc |
References | Stone GW, Ellis SG, Cox DA, TAXUS-IV Investigators, et al. One-year clinical results with the slow-release, polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stent: The TAXUS-IV trial. Circulation 2004;109(16 Suppl.):1942-1947. Baim DS, Wahr D, George B, et al. Saphenous vein graft angioplasty free of emboli randomized (SAFER) trial investigators. Randomized trial of a distal embolic protection device during percutaneous intervention of saphenous vein aorto-coronary bypass grafts. Circulation 2002;105(11 Suppl.):1285-1290. Schmuziger M, Christenson JT, Maurice J, et al. Reoperative myocardial revascularization: An analysis of 458 reoperations and 2645 single operations. Cardiovasc Surg 1994;2(5 Suppl.):623-629. Tsuchida K, Ong AT, Aoki J, et al. Immediate and one-year outcome of percutaneous intervention of saphenous vein graft disease with paclitaxel-eluting stents. Am J Cardiol 2005;96(3 Suppl.):395-398. Schampaert E, Cohen EA, Schluter M, C-SIRIUS Investigators, et al. The Canadian study of the sirolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of patients with long de novo lesions in small native coronary arteries (C-SIRIUS). J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43(6 Suppl.):1110-1115. Boyle EM Jr, Lille ST, Allaire E, et al. Endothelial cell injury in cardiovascular surgery: Atherosclerosis. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;6(3 Suppl.):885-894. Shah PJ, Gordon I, Fuller J, et al. Factors affecting saphenous vein graft patency: Clinical and angiographic study in 1402 symptomatic patients operated on between 1977 and 1999. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;126(6 Suppl.):1972-1977. Price MJ, Sawhney N, Kao JA, et al. Clinical outcomes after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for de novo saphenous vein graft lesions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interven 2005;65(2 Suppl.):208-211. Schofer J, Schluter M, Gershlick AH, E-SIRIUS Investigators, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of patients with long atherosclerotic lesions in small coronary arteries: Double-blind, randomised controlled trial (E-SIRIUS). Lancet 2003;362(9390 Suppl.):1093-1099. Ge L, Iakovou I, Sangiorgi GM, et al. Treatment of saphenous vein graft lesions with drug-eluting stents: Immediate and midterm outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45(7 Suppl.):989-994. Regar E, Serruys PW, Bode C, RAVEL Study Group, et al. Angiographic findings of the multicenter randomized study with the sirolimus-eluting Bx velocity balloon-expandable stent (RAVEL): Sirolimus-eluting stents inhibit restenosis irrespective of the vessel size. Circulation 2002;106(15 Suppl.):1949-1956. Vermeersch P, Agostoni P, Verheye S, et al. Randomized double-blind comparison of sirolimus-eluting stent versus bare-metal stent implantation in diseased saphenous vein grafts: Six-month angiographic, intravascular ultrasound, and clinical follow-up of the RRISC Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48(12 Suppl.):2423-2431. Motwani JG, Topol EJ. Aortocoronary saphenous vein graft disease: Pathogenesis, predisposition, and prevention. Circulation 1998;97(9 Suppl.):916-931. Holmes DR Jr, Topol EJ, Califf RM, et al. A multicenter, randomized trial of coronary angioplasty versus directional atherectomy for patients with saphenous vein bypass graft lesions. CAVEAT-II Investigators. Circulation 1995;91(7 Suppl.):1966-1974. Stankovic G, Colombo A, Presbitero P. Randomized evaluation of polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent in saphenous vein grafts: The randomized evaluation of polytetrafluoroethylene COVERed stent in saphenous vein grafts (RECOVERS) trial. Circulation 2003;108:37-42. Yau TM, Borger MA, Weisel RD, et al. The changing pattern of reoperative coronary surgery: Trends in 1230 consecutive reoperations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;120(1 Suppl.):156-163. Grube E, Silber S, Hauptmann KE, et al. TAXUS I: Six- and twelve-month results from a randomized, double-blind trial on a slow-release paclitaxel-eluting stent for de novo coronary lesions. Circulation 2003;107(1 Suppl.):38-42. Hoye A, Lemos PA, Arampatzis CA, et al. Effectiveness of the sirolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of saphenous vein graft disease. J Invasive Cardiol 2004;16(5 Suppl.):230-233. Fitzgibbon GM, Kafka HP, Leach AJ, et al. Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcome: Angiographic follow-up of 5,065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1,388 patients during 25 years. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28(3 Suppl.):616-626. Ruchin PE, Faddy SC, Baron, et al. Use of sirolimus-eluting (CYPHER(tm)) stents in treatment of saphenous vein graft disease in an Australian population. Heart, Lung & Circulation 2004;13:S27. Stone GW, Rogers C, Hermiller J, et al. and the FilterWire EX Randomized Evaluation Investigators. Randomized comparison of distal protection with a filter-based catheter and a balloon occlusion and aspiration system during percutaneous intervention of diseased saphenous vein aorto-coronary bypass grafts. Circulation 2003;108(5 Suppl.):548-553. De Feyter PJ. Percutaneous treatment of saphenous vein bypass graft obstructions: A continuing obstinate problem. Circulation 2003;107(18 Suppl.):2284-2286. Savage MP, Douglas JS Jr, Fischman DL, et al. Stent placement compared with balloon angioplasty for obstructed coronary bypass grafts. Saphenous Vein De Novo Trial Investigators. New Engl J Med 1997;337(11 Suppl.):740-747. Chu WW, Kuchulakanti PK, Wang B, et al. Efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents as compared to paclitaxel-eluting stents for saphenous vein graft intervention. J Interven Cardiol 2006;19(2 Suppl.):121-125. Wöhrle J, Nusser T, Kestler A, et al. Comparison of the slow-release polymerbased paclitaxel-eluting Taxus-Express stent with the bare-metal Express stent for saphenous vein graft interventions. Clin Res Cardiol 2007;96(2 Suppl.):70-76. Cox JL, Chiasson DA, Gotlieb AI. Stranger in a strange land: The pathogenesis of saphenous vein graft stenosis with emphasis on structural and functional differences between veins and arteries. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1991;34(1 Suppl.):45-68. Lefkovits J, Holmes DR, Califf RM, et al. Predictors and sequelae of distal embolization during saphenous vein graft intervention from the CAVEAT-II trial. Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial. Circulation 1995;92(4 Suppl.):734-740. 2004; 43 1997; 337 1995; 92 1995; 91 1991; 34 2005; 65 2006; 19 2007; 96 2004; 109 1997; 6 2005; 45 2003; 108 1996; 28 2003; 107 2004; 16 2006; 48 2004; 13 2002; 106 2005; 96 2002; 105 2000; 120 2003; 126 1998; 97 1994; 2 2003; 362 Ruchin PE (e_1_2_6_27_2) 2004; 13 Schmuziger M (e_1_2_6_7_2) 1994; 2 Lefkovits J (e_1_2_6_12_2) 1995; 92 e_1_2_6_18_2 e_1_2_6_19_2 e_1_2_6_10_2 e_1_2_6_11_2 e_1_2_6_16_2 e_1_2_6_17_2 e_1_2_6_14_2 e_1_2_6_15_2 e_1_2_6_20_2 Baim DS (e_1_2_6_13_2) 2002; 105 e_1_2_6_8_2 e_1_2_6_9_2 e_1_2_6_4_2 e_1_2_6_3_2 Fitzgibbon GM (e_1_2_6_6_2) 1996; 28 Hoye A (e_1_2_6_22_2) 2004; 16 e_1_2_6_5_2 e_1_2_6_24_2 e_1_2_6_23_2 e_1_2_6_2_2 e_1_2_6_21_2 e_1_2_6_28_2 e_1_2_6_26_2 e_1_2_6_25_2 |
References_xml | – reference: Stone GW, Rogers C, Hermiller J, et al. and the FilterWire EX Randomized Evaluation Investigators. Randomized comparison of distal protection with a filter-based catheter and a balloon occlusion and aspiration system during percutaneous intervention of diseased saphenous vein aorto-coronary bypass grafts. Circulation 2003;108(5 Suppl.):548-553. – reference: Ge L, Iakovou I, Sangiorgi GM, et al. Treatment of saphenous vein graft lesions with drug-eluting stents: Immediate and midterm outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45(7 Suppl.):989-994. – reference: Lefkovits J, Holmes DR, Califf RM, et al. Predictors and sequelae of distal embolization during saphenous vein graft intervention from the CAVEAT-II trial. Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial. Circulation 1995;92(4 Suppl.):734-740. – reference: Grube E, Silber S, Hauptmann KE, et al. TAXUS I: Six- and twelve-month results from a randomized, double-blind trial on a slow-release paclitaxel-eluting stent for de novo coronary lesions. Circulation 2003;107(1 Suppl.):38-42. – reference: Price MJ, Sawhney N, Kao JA, et al. Clinical outcomes after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for de novo saphenous vein graft lesions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interven 2005;65(2 Suppl.):208-211. – reference: Chu WW, Kuchulakanti PK, Wang B, et al. Efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents as compared to paclitaxel-eluting stents for saphenous vein graft intervention. J Interven Cardiol 2006;19(2 Suppl.):121-125. – reference: Vermeersch P, Agostoni P, Verheye S, et al. Randomized double-blind comparison of sirolimus-eluting stent versus bare-metal stent implantation in diseased saphenous vein grafts: Six-month angiographic, intravascular ultrasound, and clinical follow-up of the RRISC Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48(12 Suppl.):2423-2431. – reference: Ruchin PE, Faddy SC, Baron, et al. Use of sirolimus-eluting (CYPHER(tm)) stents in treatment of saphenous vein graft disease in an Australian population. Heart, Lung & Circulation 2004;13:S27. – reference: Savage MP, Douglas JS Jr, Fischman DL, et al. Stent placement compared with balloon angioplasty for obstructed coronary bypass grafts. Saphenous Vein De Novo Trial Investigators. New Engl J Med 1997;337(11 Suppl.):740-747. – reference: Hoye A, Lemos PA, Arampatzis CA, et al. Effectiveness of the sirolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of saphenous vein graft disease. J Invasive Cardiol 2004;16(5 Suppl.):230-233. – reference: Stone GW, Ellis SG, Cox DA, TAXUS-IV Investigators, et al. One-year clinical results with the slow-release, polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stent: The TAXUS-IV trial. Circulation 2004;109(16 Suppl.):1942-1947. – reference: Yau TM, Borger MA, Weisel RD, et al. The changing pattern of reoperative coronary surgery: Trends in 1230 consecutive reoperations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;120(1 Suppl.):156-163. – reference: Regar E, Serruys PW, Bode C, RAVEL Study Group, et al. Angiographic findings of the multicenter randomized study with the sirolimus-eluting Bx velocity balloon-expandable stent (RAVEL): Sirolimus-eluting stents inhibit restenosis irrespective of the vessel size. Circulation 2002;106(15 Suppl.):1949-1956. – reference: Baim DS, Wahr D, George B, et al. Saphenous vein graft angioplasty free of emboli randomized (SAFER) trial investigators. Randomized trial of a distal embolic protection device during percutaneous intervention of saphenous vein aorto-coronary bypass grafts. Circulation 2002;105(11 Suppl.):1285-1290. – reference: De Feyter PJ. Percutaneous treatment of saphenous vein bypass graft obstructions: A continuing obstinate problem. Circulation 2003;107(18 Suppl.):2284-2286. – reference: Tsuchida K, Ong AT, Aoki J, et al. Immediate and one-year outcome of percutaneous intervention of saphenous vein graft disease with paclitaxel-eluting stents. Am J Cardiol 2005;96(3 Suppl.):395-398. – reference: Fitzgibbon GM, Kafka HP, Leach AJ, et al. Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcome: Angiographic follow-up of 5,065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1,388 patients during 25 years. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28(3 Suppl.):616-626. – reference: Holmes DR Jr, Topol EJ, Califf RM, et al. A multicenter, randomized trial of coronary angioplasty versus directional atherectomy for patients with saphenous vein bypass graft lesions. CAVEAT-II Investigators. Circulation 1995;91(7 Suppl.):1966-1974. – reference: Cox JL, Chiasson DA, Gotlieb AI. Stranger in a strange land: The pathogenesis of saphenous vein graft stenosis with emphasis on structural and functional differences between veins and arteries. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1991;34(1 Suppl.):45-68. – reference: Schampaert E, Cohen EA, Schluter M, C-SIRIUS Investigators, et al. The Canadian study of the sirolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of patients with long de novo lesions in small native coronary arteries (C-SIRIUS). J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43(6 Suppl.):1110-1115. – reference: Schofer J, Schluter M, Gershlick AH, E-SIRIUS Investigators, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of patients with long atherosclerotic lesions in small coronary arteries: Double-blind, randomised controlled trial (E-SIRIUS). Lancet 2003;362(9390 Suppl.):1093-1099. – reference: Shah PJ, Gordon I, Fuller J, et al. Factors affecting saphenous vein graft patency: Clinical and angiographic study in 1402 symptomatic patients operated on between 1977 and 1999. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;126(6 Suppl.):1972-1977. – reference: Schmuziger M, Christenson JT, Maurice J, et al. Reoperative myocardial revascularization: An analysis of 458 reoperations and 2645 single operations. Cardiovasc Surg 1994;2(5 Suppl.):623-629. – reference: Boyle EM Jr, Lille ST, Allaire E, et al. Endothelial cell injury in cardiovascular surgery: Atherosclerosis. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;6(3 Suppl.):885-894. – reference: Wöhrle J, Nusser T, Kestler A, et al. Comparison of the slow-release polymerbased paclitaxel-eluting Taxus-Express stent with the bare-metal Express stent for saphenous vein graft interventions. Clin Res Cardiol 2007;96(2 Suppl.):70-76. – reference: Motwani JG, Topol EJ. Aortocoronary saphenous vein graft disease: Pathogenesis, predisposition, and prevention. Circulation 1998;97(9 Suppl.):916-931. – reference: Stankovic G, Colombo A, Presbitero P. Randomized evaluation of polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent in saphenous vein grafts: The randomized evaluation of polytetrafluoroethylene COVERed stent in saphenous vein grafts (RECOVERS) trial. Circulation 2003;108:37-42. – volume: 96 start-page: 70 issue: 2 Suppl. year: 2007 end-page: 76 article-title: Comparison of the slow‐release polymerbased paclitaxel‐eluting Taxus‐Express stent with the bare‐metal Express stent for saphenous vein graft interventions publication-title: Clin Res Cardiol – volume: 105 start-page: 1285 issue: 11 Suppl. year: 2002 end-page: 1290 article-title: Saphenous vein graft angioplasty free of emboli randomized (SAFER) trial investigators. Randomized trial of a distal embolic protection device during percutaneous intervention of saphenous vein aorto‐coronary bypass grafts publication-title: Circulation – volume: 65 start-page: 208 issue: 2 Suppl. year: 2005 end-page: 211 article-title: Clinical outcomes after sirolimus‐eluting stent implantation for de novo saphenous vein graft lesions publication-title: Catheter Cardiovasc Interven – volume: 362 start-page: 1093 issue: 9390 Suppl. year: 2003 end-page: 1099 article-title: Sirolimus‐eluting stents for treatment of patients with long atherosclerotic lesions in small coronary arteries: Double‐blind, randomised controlled trial (E‐SIRIUS) publication-title: Lancet – volume: 108 start-page: 37 year: 2003 end-page: 42 article-title: Randomized evaluation of polytetrafluoroethylene‐covered stent in saphenous vein grafts: The randomized evaluation of polytetrafluoroethylene COVERed stent in saphenous vein grafts (RECOVERS) trial publication-title: Circulation – volume: 126 start-page: 1972 issue: 6 Suppl. year: 2003 end-page: 1977 article-title: Factors affecting saphenous vein graft patency: Clinical and angiographic study in 1402 symptomatic patients operated on between 1977 and 1999 publication-title: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg – volume: 28 start-page: 616 issue: 3 Suppl. year: 1996 end-page: 626 article-title: Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcome: Angiographic follow‐up of 5,065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1,388 patients during 25 years publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol – volume: 106 start-page: 1949 issue: 15 Suppl. year: 2002 end-page: 1956 article-title: Angiographic findings of the multicenter randomized study with the sirolimus‐eluting Bx velocity balloon‐expandable stent (RAVEL): Sirolimus‐eluting stents inhibit restenosis irrespective of the vessel size publication-title: Circulation – volume: 48 start-page: 2423 issue: 12 Suppl. year: 2006 end-page: 2431 article-title: Randomized double‐blind comparison of sirolimus‐eluting stent versus bare‐metal stent implantation in diseased saphenous vein grafts: Six‐month angiographic, intravascular ultrasound, and clinical follow‐up of the RRISC Trial publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol – volume: 97 start-page: 916 issue: 9 Suppl. year: 1998 end-page: 931 article-title: Aortocoronary saphenous vein graft disease: Pathogenesis, predisposition, and prevention publication-title: Circulation – volume: 45 start-page: 989 issue: 7 Suppl. year: 2005 end-page: 994 article-title: Treatment of saphenous vein graft lesions with drug‐eluting stents: Immediate and midterm outcome publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol – volume: 43 start-page: 1110 issue: 6 Suppl. year: 2004 end-page: 1115 article-title: The Canadian study of the sirolimus‐eluting stent in the treatment of patients with long de novo lesions in small native coronary arteries (C‐SIRIUS) publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol – volume: 92 start-page: 734 issue: 4 Suppl. year: 1995 end-page: 740 article-title: Predictors and sequelae of distal embolization during saphenous vein graft intervention from the CAVEAT‐II trial publication-title: Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial. Circulation – volume: 107 start-page: 2284 issue: 18 Suppl. year: 2003 end-page: 2286 article-title: Percutaneous treatment of saphenous vein bypass graft obstructions: A continuing obstinate problem publication-title: Circulation – volume: 337 start-page: 740 issue: 11 Suppl. year: 1997 end-page: 747 article-title: Stent placement compared with balloon angioplasty for obstructed coronary bypass grafts. Saphenous Vein De Novo Trial Investigators publication-title: New Engl J Med – volume: 91 start-page: 1966 issue: 7 Suppl. year: 1995 end-page: 1974 article-title: A multicenter, randomized trial of coronary angioplasty versus directional atherectomy for patients with saphenous vein bypass graft lesions. CAVEAT‐II Investigators publication-title: Circulation – volume: 107 start-page: 38 issue: 1 Suppl. year: 2003 end-page: 42 article-title: TAXUS I: Six‐ and twelve‐month results from a randomized, double‐blind trial on a slow‐release paclitaxel‐eluting stent for de novo coronary lesions publication-title: Circulation – volume: 16 start-page: 230 issue: 5 Suppl. year: 2004 end-page: 233 article-title: Effectiveness of the sirolimus‐eluting stent in the treatment of saphenous vein graft disease publication-title: J Invasive Cardiol – volume: 19 start-page: 121 issue: 2 Suppl. year: 2006 end-page: 125 article-title: Efficacy of sirolimus‐eluting stents as compared to paclitaxel‐eluting stents for saphenous vein graft intervention publication-title: J Interven Cardiol – volume: 2 start-page: 623 issue: 5 Suppl. year: 1994 end-page: 629 article-title: Reoperative myocardial revascularization: An analysis of 458 reoperations and 2645 single operations publication-title: Cardiovasc Surg – volume: 108 start-page: 548 issue: 5 Suppl. year: 2003 end-page: 553 article-title: and the FilterWire EX Randomized Evaluation Investigators. Randomized comparison of distal protection with a filter‐based catheter and a balloon occlusion and aspiration system during percutaneous intervention of diseased saphenous vein aorto‐coronary bypass grafts publication-title: Circulation – volume: 13 start-page: S27 year: 2004 article-title: Use of sirolimus‐eluting (CYPHER(tm)) stents in treatment of saphenous vein graft disease in an Australian population publication-title: Heart, Lung & Circulation – volume: 34 start-page: 45 issue: 1 Suppl. year: 1991 end-page: 68 article-title: Stranger in a strange land: The pathogenesis of saphenous vein graft stenosis with emphasis on structural and functional differences between veins and arteries publication-title: Prog Cardiovasc Dis – volume: 109 start-page: 1942 issue: 16 Suppl. year: 2004 end-page: 1947 article-title: One‐year clinical results with the slow‐release, polymer‐based, paclitaxel‐eluting TAXUS stent: The TAXUS‐IV trial publication-title: Circulation – volume: 96 start-page: 395 issue: 3 Suppl. year: 2005 end-page: 398 article-title: Immediate and one‐year outcome of percutaneous intervention of saphenous vein graft disease with paclitaxel‐eluting stents publication-title: Am J Cardiol – volume: 120 start-page: 156 issue: 1 Suppl. year: 2000 end-page: 163 article-title: The changing pattern of reoperative coronary surgery: Trends in 1230 consecutive reoperations publication-title: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg – volume: 6 start-page: 885 issue: 3 Suppl. year: 1997 end-page: 894 article-title: Endothelial cell injury in cardiovascular surgery: Atherosclerosis publication-title: Ann Thorac Surg – ident: e_1_2_6_2_2 doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(97)00057-X – ident: e_1_2_6_24_2 doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2006.00118.x – ident: e_1_2_6_17_2 doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.01.024 – volume: 16 start-page: 230 issue: 5 year: 2004 ident: e_1_2_6_22_2 article-title: Effectiveness of the sirolimus‐eluting stent in the treatment of saphenous vein graft disease publication-title: J Invasive Cardiol – ident: e_1_2_6_10_2 doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000069360.38675.22 – ident: e_1_2_6_4_2 doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.97.9.916 – volume: 13 start-page: S27 year: 2004 ident: e_1_2_6_27_2 article-title: Use of sirolimus‐eluting (CYPHER(tm)) stents in treatment of saphenous vein graft disease in an Australian population publication-title: Heart, Lung & Circulation – ident: e_1_2_6_3_2 doi: 10.1016/0033-0620(91)90019-I – ident: e_1_2_6_28_2 doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.11.060 – volume: 28 start-page: 616 issue: 3 year: 1996 ident: e_1_2_6_6_2 article-title: Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcome: Angiographic follow‐up of 5,065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1,388 patients during 25 years publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(96)00206-9 – ident: e_1_2_6_20_2 doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000079106.71097.1C – ident: e_1_2_6_23_2 doi: 10.1002/ccd.20369 – volume: 2 start-page: 623 issue: 5 year: 1994 ident: e_1_2_6_7_2 article-title: Reoperative myocardial revascularization: An analysis of 458 reoperations and 2645 single operations publication-title: Cardiovasc Surg doi: 10.1177/096721099400200517 – ident: e_1_2_6_11_2 doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.91.7.1966 – ident: e_1_2_6_8_2 doi: 10.1067/mtc.2000.106983 – ident: e_1_2_6_26_2 doi: 10.1007/s00392-006-0460-1 – ident: e_1_2_6_15_2 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14462-5 – ident: e_1_2_6_18_2 doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000047700.58683.A1 – ident: e_1_2_6_21_2 doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.03.084 – ident: e_1_2_6_25_2 doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.09.021 – ident: e_1_2_6_9_2 doi: 10.1056/NEJM199709113371103 – volume: 92 start-page: 734 issue: 4 year: 1995 ident: e_1_2_6_12_2 article-title: Predictors and sequelae of distal embolization during saphenous vein graft intervention from the CAVEAT‐II trial publication-title: Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial. Circulation – volume: 105 start-page: 1285 issue: 11 year: 2002 ident: e_1_2_6_13_2 article-title: Saphenous vein graft angioplasty free of emboli randomized (SAFER) trial investigators. Randomized trial of a distal embolic protection device during percutaneous intervention of saphenous vein aorto‐coronary bypass grafts publication-title: Circulation doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000012783.63093.0C – ident: e_1_2_6_5_2 doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(03)01276-5 – ident: e_1_2_6_14_2 doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000080894.51311.0A – ident: e_1_2_6_16_2 doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000034045.36219.12 – ident: e_1_2_6_19_2 doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000127110.49192.72 |
SSID | ssj0020552 |
Score | 1.7957532 |
Snippet | Background:
Randomized trials in selected patient populations have demonstrated dramatic reductions in the incidence of in‐stent restenosis (ISR) following... Randomized trials in selected patient populations have demonstrated dramatic reductions in the incidence of in-stent restenosis (ISR) following implantation of... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref wiley istex |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 258 |
SubjectTerms | Aged Aged, 80 and over Databases, Factual Female Graft Occlusion, Vascular - mortality Graft Occlusion, Vascular - pathology Graft Occlusion, Vascular - therapy Humans Male Middle Aged New South Wales - epidemiology Paclitaxel - administration & dosage Postoperative Complications Prospective Studies Saphenous Vein - transplantation Stents Survival Analysis Treatment Outcome |
Title | Clinical Follow-Up of Paclitaxel-Eluting (TAXUS™) Stents for the Treatment of Saphenous Vein Graft Disease |
URI | https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-CB4WR426-G/fulltext.pdf https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fj.1540-8183.2007.00268.x https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17680855 https://www.proquest.com/docview/68136782 |
Volume | 20 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVEBS databaseName: Academic Search Ultimate - eBooks customDbUrl: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s3936755&profile=ehost&defaultdb=asn eissn: 1540-8183 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0020552 issn: 0896-4327 databaseCode: ABDBF dateStart: 20030201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.ebscohost.com/direct.asp?db=asn providerName: EBSCOhost – providerCode: PRVWIB databaseName: Wiley Online Library - Core collection (SURFmarket) issn: 0896-4327 databaseCode: DR2 dateStart: 19970101 customDbUrl: isFulltext: true eissn: 1540-8183 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0020552 providerName: Wiley-Blackwell |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lj9MwELbQIiEuvB_d5eEDQnBIlfiROMelbLustAvatmxvlu04CLVKq24qKk4c-AH8Bn7a_hJm8igU7WGFOCWKNEk8nrE_e8bfEPJCeuhX4-KAG4BvQhoeGJUAkJMc3DLyhlk8nHx8Eh-OxdFETpr8JzwLU_NDbDbc0DOq8Rod3NjzbSfHoD5MOLxlImSx6iKejLisIranGyYpFsqq-E6o0jgQnCXbST2XvmhrprqOSl9fBkO3UW01LfVvk2nboDobZdpdlbbrvv7F9fh_WnyH3GrQK92vze0uueaLe-TGcROfv08WDc3ojPbBvuZfLr79GC_oPKcfjEM28LWfwaMDtPbiE3012p-Mhxfff76mwxITOiggaAqIlI7a9HeUHRrMQ5uvzulH_7mgg6XJS_q2Diw9IOP-wah3GDQ1HQIH0FAFAEgSuOYuZj4xgsc8yqM0dZJLq1ieqgyWzFxImwmVh6HPskRZmdqEGe-syPhDslPMC_-YUAPDiWXCRj6NRJZxC-aW2pDlylsnFOuQpO0_7RrCc6y7MdN_LHxAoRoViuU4MRIPCtXrDok2koua9OMKMi8rE9kImOUUk-YSqc9OBrr3RpydAhrSgw553tqQBlfG-IwpPChRxwr58_DHH9Wm9fvjCVZIkbJD4spArvxX-uj9ux7c7f6r4B65We9mY8rjE7JTLlf-KcCw0j6rHOwXSt0iOA |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9NAEF6hVgIulGdJeXQPCMHBkb0Pe30saZO0NAE1Cc1ttWuvEWrkRCEREScO_AB-Az-tv4QZPwJBPVSIky1LY3tnZ3a_3Zn9hpAX0kG_miT0uAH4JqThnlERADnJwS0DZ5jFw8m9ftgdiZOxHFflgPAsTMkPsd5wQ88oxmt0cNyQ3vRyjOrDjMNrKkIWqiYAym0M16GXHp6tuaSYL4vyO76KQ09wFm2m9Vz5po25ahvVvroKiG7i2mJiau-QSd2kMh_lorlc2Gby9S-2x__U5rvkTgVg6UFpcffIDZffJzd7VYj-AZlVTKMT2gYTm365_PZjNKPTjL43CRKCr9wEHh2hwecf6avhwXg0uPz-8zUdLDCngwKIpgBK6bDOgEfZgcFUtOnyM_3gPuW0MzfZgh6WsaWHZNQ-Gra6XlXWwUsAHSoPMEkE1ywJmYuM4CEPsiCOE8mlVSyLVQqrZi6kTYXKfN-laaSsjG3EjEusSPkjspVPc_eYUAMjimXCBi4ORJpyCxYXW59lytlEKNYgUd2BOqk4z7H0xkT_sfYBhWpUKFbkxGA8KFSvGiRYS85K3o9ryLwsbGQtYOYXmDcXSX3e7-jWG3F-BoBIdxpkvzYiDd6MIRqTO1CiDhVS6OGP75a29fvjERZJkbJBwsJCrv1X-uTdcQvu9v5VcJ_c6g57p_r0uP_2Cbldbm5jBuRTsrWYL90zQGUL-7zwtl91KyZU |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9NAEF6hVqq48IaGV_eAEBwc2fuw18eSNmkLDVWT0NxWu_YaoUROFBwRceLAD-A38NP6S5jxIxDUQ4U42bI0tnd2ZvfbndlvCHkhHfSrSUKPG4BvQhruGRUBkJMc3DJwhlk8nHzaD49G4mQsx3X-E56Fqfgh1htu6BnleI0OPk-zTSfHoD5MOLxhImShagOe3BYhLLYQIJ2vqaSYL8vqO76KQ09wFm1m9Vz5po2pahu1vroKh27C2nJe6t4mk6ZFVTrKpL0sbDv5-hfZ4_9p8h1yq4avdL-yt7vkhsvvkZ3TOkB_n8xrntEp7YKBzb5cfvsxmtNZRs9MgnTgKzeFR4do7vlH-mq4Px4NLr__fE0HBWZ0UIDQFCApHTb57yg7MJiINlt-ph_cp5z2FiYr6EEVWXpARt3DYefIq4s6eAlgQ-UBIongmiUhc5ERPORBFsRxIrm0imWxSmHNzIW0qVCZ77s0jZSVsY2YcYkVKX9ItvJZ7nYJNTCeWCZs4OJApCm3YG-x9VmmnE2EYi0SNf2nk5rxHAtvTPUfKx9QqEaFYj1ODMWDQvWqRYK15Lxi_biGzMvSRNYCZjHBrLlI6ot-T3feiItzgEO61yJ7jQ1p8GUM0JjcgRJ1qJBAD3_8UWVavz8eYYkUKVskLA3k2n-lT94fd-Du8b8K7pGds4Oufnfcf_uE3Kx2tjH98SnZKhZL9wwgWWGfl772C9AvJQM |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical+Follow%E2%80%90Up+of+Paclitaxel%E2%80%90Eluting+%28TAXUS%E2%84%A2%29+Stents+for+the+Treatment+of+Saphenous+Vein+Graft+Disease&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+interventional+cardiology&rft.au=RUCHIN%2C+P.E.&rft.au=FADDY%2C+S.C.&rft.au=MULLER%2C+D.W.M.&rft.au=BARON%2C+D.W.&rft.date=2007-08-01&rft.pub=Blackwell+Publishing+Inc&rft.issn=0896-4327&rft.eissn=1540-8183&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=258&rft.epage=264&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fj.1540-8183.2007.00268.x&rft.externalDBID=10.1111%252Fj.1540-8183.2007.00268.x&rft.externalDocID=JOIC268 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0896-4327&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0896-4327&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0896-4327&client=summon |