Clinical Follow-Up of Paclitaxel-Eluting (TAXUS™) Stents for the Treatment of Saphenous Vein Graft Disease

Background: Randomized trials in selected patient populations have demonstrated dramatic reductions in the incidence of in‐stent restenosis (ISR) following implantation of paclitaxel‐eluting (PE) coronary stents compared with bare metal stents in native coronary disease. The clinical outcome followi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of interventional cardiology Vol. 20; no. 4; pp. 258 - 264
Main Authors RUCHIN, P.E., FADDY, S.C., MULLER, D.W.M., BARON, D.W., ROY, P.R., WILSON, S.H.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Malden, USA Blackwell Publishing Inc 01.08.2007
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0896-4327
1540-8183
DOI10.1111/j.1540-8183.2007.00268.x

Cover

Abstract Background: Randomized trials in selected patient populations have demonstrated dramatic reductions in the incidence of in‐stent restenosis (ISR) following implantation of paclitaxel‐eluting (PE) coronary stents compared with bare metal stents in native coronary disease. The clinical outcome following implantation of PE stents for saphenous vein graft (SVG) stenosis is largely unknown. Aim: To assess the safety and efficacy of PE coronary stents for the treatment of SVG stenosis in an unselected population. Methods: All patients who received PE stents for the treatment of SVG disease from May 1, 2003, to May 1, 2005, were entered into a prospectively collected database. Fifty‐five patients were identified with 69 lesions. In‐hospital and late major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR) were recorded as well as the rate of target vessel revascularization (TVR). Results: Mean follow‐up was 13 months with 54 of the 55 patients contacted. The number of stents implanted was 1.12 ± 0.37 per lesion and 1.38 ± 0.59 per patient. Clinically significant procedural MACE was 0%. The late MACE rate was 9% with a 2% clinically driven TLR, a 4% coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), and a 4% TVR rate. There were four deaths, two cardiac and two noncardiac. Conclusion: PE stents appear safe and effective in the treatment of SVG disease at a mean follow‐up time of 13 months. Randomized studies are needed to further delineate the optimal management of this high‐risk group.
AbstractList Background: Randomized trials in selected patient populations have demonstrated dramatic reductions in the incidence of in‐stent restenosis (ISR) following implantation of paclitaxel‐eluting (PE) coronary stents compared with bare metal stents in native coronary disease. The clinical outcome following implantation of PE stents for saphenous vein graft (SVG) stenosis is largely unknown. Aim: To assess the safety and efficacy of PE coronary stents for the treatment of SVG stenosis in an unselected population. Methods: All patients who received PE stents for the treatment of SVG disease from May 1, 2003, to May 1, 2005, were entered into a prospectively collected database. Fifty‐five patients were identified with 69 lesions. In‐hospital and late major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR) were recorded as well as the rate of target vessel revascularization (TVR). Results: Mean follow‐up was 13 months with 54 of the 55 patients contacted. The number of stents implanted was 1.12 ± 0.37 per lesion and 1.38 ± 0.59 per patient. Clinically significant procedural MACE was 0%. The late MACE rate was 9% with a 2% clinically driven TLR, a 4% coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), and a 4% TVR rate. There were four deaths, two cardiac and two noncardiac. Conclusion: PE stents appear safe and effective in the treatment of SVG disease at a mean follow‐up time of 13 months. Randomized studies are needed to further delineate the optimal management of this high‐risk group.
Randomized trials in selected patient populations have demonstrated dramatic reductions in the incidence of in-stent restenosis (ISR) following implantation of paclitaxel-eluting (PE) coronary stents compared with bare metal stents in native coronary disease. The clinical outcome following implantation of PE stents for saphenous vein graft (SVG) stenosis is largely unknown. To assess the safety and efficacy of PE coronary stents for the treatment of SVG stenosis in an unselected population. All patients who received PE stents for the treatment of SVG disease from May 1, 2003, to May 1, 2005, were entered into a prospectively collected database. Fifty-five patients were identified with 69 lesions. In-hospital and late major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR) were recorded as well as the rate of target vessel revascularization (TVR). Mean follow-up was 13 months with 54 of the 55 patients contacted. The number of stents implanted was 1.12 +/- 0.37 per lesion and 1.38 +/- 0.59 per patient. Clinically significant procedural MACE was 0%. The late MACE rate was 9% with a 2% clinically driven TLR, a 4% coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), and a 4% TVR rate. There were four deaths, two cardiac and two noncardiac. PE stents appear safe and effective in the treatment of SVG disease at a mean follow-up time of 13 months. Randomized studies are needed to further delineate the optimal management of this high-risk group.
Randomized trials in selected patient populations have demonstrated dramatic reductions in the incidence of in-stent restenosis (ISR) following implantation of paclitaxel-eluting (PE) coronary stents compared with bare metal stents in native coronary disease. The clinical outcome following implantation of PE stents for saphenous vein graft (SVG) stenosis is largely unknown.BACKGROUNDRandomized trials in selected patient populations have demonstrated dramatic reductions in the incidence of in-stent restenosis (ISR) following implantation of paclitaxel-eluting (PE) coronary stents compared with bare metal stents in native coronary disease. The clinical outcome following implantation of PE stents for saphenous vein graft (SVG) stenosis is largely unknown.To assess the safety and efficacy of PE coronary stents for the treatment of SVG stenosis in an unselected population.AIMTo assess the safety and efficacy of PE coronary stents for the treatment of SVG stenosis in an unselected population.All patients who received PE stents for the treatment of SVG disease from May 1, 2003, to May 1, 2005, were entered into a prospectively collected database. Fifty-five patients were identified with 69 lesions. In-hospital and late major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR) were recorded as well as the rate of target vessel revascularization (TVR).METHODSAll patients who received PE stents for the treatment of SVG disease from May 1, 2003, to May 1, 2005, were entered into a prospectively collected database. Fifty-five patients were identified with 69 lesions. In-hospital and late major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR) were recorded as well as the rate of target vessel revascularization (TVR).Mean follow-up was 13 months with 54 of the 55 patients contacted. The number of stents implanted was 1.12 +/- 0.37 per lesion and 1.38 +/- 0.59 per patient. Clinically significant procedural MACE was 0%. The late MACE rate was 9% with a 2% clinically driven TLR, a 4% coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), and a 4% TVR rate. There were four deaths, two cardiac and two noncardiac.RESULTSMean follow-up was 13 months with 54 of the 55 patients contacted. The number of stents implanted was 1.12 +/- 0.37 per lesion and 1.38 +/- 0.59 per patient. Clinically significant procedural MACE was 0%. The late MACE rate was 9% with a 2% clinically driven TLR, a 4% coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), and a 4% TVR rate. There were four deaths, two cardiac and two noncardiac.PE stents appear safe and effective in the treatment of SVG disease at a mean follow-up time of 13 months. Randomized studies are needed to further delineate the optimal management of this high-risk group.CONCLUSIONPE stents appear safe and effective in the treatment of SVG disease at a mean follow-up time of 13 months. Randomized studies are needed to further delineate the optimal management of this high-risk group.
Author WILSON, S.H.
ROY, P.R.
BARON, D.W.
FADDY, S.C.
MULLER, D.W.M.
RUCHIN, P.E.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: P.E.
  surname: RUCHIN
  fullname: RUCHIN, P.E.
  organization: Department of Cardiology, St. Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
– sequence: 2
  givenname: S.C.
  surname: FADDY
  fullname: FADDY, S.C.
  organization: Department of Cardiology, St. Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
– sequence: 3
  givenname: D.W.M.
  surname: MULLER
  fullname: MULLER, D.W.M.
  organization: Department of Cardiology, St. Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
– sequence: 4
  givenname: D.W.
  surname: BARON
  fullname: BARON, D.W.
  organization: Department of Cardiology, St. Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
– sequence: 5
  givenname: P.R.
  surname: ROY
  fullname: ROY, P.R.
  organization: Department of Cardiology, St. Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
– sequence: 6
  givenname: S.H.
  surname: WILSON
  fullname: WILSON, S.H.
  organization: Department of Cardiology, St. Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17680855$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNkcFu1DAQhi1URLeFV0A-ITgkOHYcOweQStouRRVF7C7lZjnJhHrxJovtVbf3PgmPxpPgsKVInOrLWOP_-8f65wDt9UMPCOGMpFk8r5dpxnOSyEyylBIiUkJoIdPtIzS5f9hDEyLLIskZFfvowPtlFBHO6RO0n4lCEsn5BNnKmt402uLTwdrhOlms8dDhT7qxJugt2OTEboLpv-GX86Ovi9mv25-v8CxAHzzuBofDFeC5Ax1WsTWSM72-gn7YePwFTI-nTncBHxsP2sNT9LjT1sOzu3qIFqcn8-p9cn4xPauOzpMmJ1wmQlIRa9cUFITOWcGyLivLhjNeS9qVsmWSsZzXbS47QqBthax5WQuqoanzlh2iFzvftRt-bMAHtTK-AWt1D_FnqpAZK-KUKHx-J9zUK2jV2pmVdjfqbz5RIHeCxg3eO-j-SYgaV6GWakxcjYmrcRXqzyrUNqJv_0ObmGgwQx-cNvYhBm92BtfGws2DB6sPF2dVvEU-2fHGB9je89p9V4VggqvLj1NVvcsvP-e0UFP2G0TcsRQ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_4244_EIJV5I6A119
crossref_primary_10_1161_CIRCULATIONAHA_109_874057
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1540_8183_2010_00588_x
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1540_8183_2007_00341_x
Cites_doi 10.1016/S0003-4975(97)00057-X
10.1111/j.1540-8183.2006.00118.x
10.1016/j.jacc.2004.01.024
10.1161/01.CIR.0000069360.38675.22
10.1161/01.CIR.97.9.916
10.1016/0033-0620(91)90019-I
10.1016/j.jacc.2004.11.060
10.1016/0735-1097(96)00206-9
10.1161/01.CIR.0000079106.71097.1C
10.1002/ccd.20369
10.1177/096721099400200517
10.1161/01.CIR.91.7.1966
10.1067/mtc.2000.106983
10.1007/s00392-006-0460-1
10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14462-5
10.1161/01.CIR.0000047700.58683.A1
10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.03.084
10.1016/j.jacc.2006.09.021
10.1056/NEJM199709113371103
10.1161/01.CIR.0000012783.63093.0C
10.1016/S0022-5223(03)01276-5
10.1161/01.CIR.0000080894.51311.0A
10.1161/01.CIR.0000034045.36219.12
10.1161/01.CIR.0000127110.49192.72
ContentType Journal Article
DBID BSCLL
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2007.00268.x
DatabaseName Istex
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef
MEDLINE

MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1540-8183
EndPage 264
ExternalDocumentID 17680855
10_1111_j_1540_8183_2007_00268_x
JOIC268
ark_67375_WNG_CB4WR426_G
Genre article
Evaluation Studies
Journal Article
GeographicLocations New South Wales
GeographicLocations_xml – name: New South Wales
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.GA
.GJ
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
1OB
24P
29K
31~
36B
3SF
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
53G
5GY
5HH
5LA
5VS
66C
702
7PT
7X7
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8FI
8FJ
8UM
930
A01
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAMMB
AANHP
AAONW
AAWTL
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABDBF
ABEML
ABJNI
ABOCM
ABPVW
ABUWG
ACBWZ
ACCMX
ACGFS
ACMXC
ACPRK
ACRPL
ACSCC
ACUHS
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADNMO
AEFGJ
AEIMD
AENEX
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFKRA
AFZJQ
AGQPQ
AGXDD
AHEFC
AIDQK
AIDYY
AIQQE
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMBMR
ASPBG
ATUGU
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BCNDV
BDRZF
BENPR
BHBCM
BMXJE
BPHCQ
BPMNR
BROTX
BRXPI
BSCLL
BVXVI
BY8
CAG
CCPQU
COF
CS3
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
D-I
DC6
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DU5
EAD
EAP
EAS
EBD
EBS
EJD
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
ENC
EPT
ESX
EX3
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FEDTE
FUBAC
FYUFA
FZ0
G-S
G.N
GODZA
GROUPED_DOAJ
H.X
HF~
HMCUK
HVGLF
HYE
HZI
HZ~
IAO
IHE
IHR
INH
ITC
IX1
J0M
K48
LC2
LC3
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
O66
O9-
OIG
OK1
OVD
P2W
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
PALCI
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PUEGO
Q.N
Q11
QB0
Q~Q
R.K
RIWAO
RJQFR
ROL
RPM
RX1
SAMSI
SUPJJ
SV3
TEORI
TUS
UB1
UKHRP
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WHWMO
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WOHZO
WOW
WQJ
WVDHM
WXI
WXSBR
XG1
ZZTAW
~IA
~WT
1OC
33P
AAHHS
AAJEY
ACCFJ
AEEZP
AEQDE
AEUQT
AFPWT
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALIPV
RHX
WRC
WUP
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c4058-7827058fc62e7a43631f199c535b82f98d383345bd48f00edd78b59b72aecb4d3
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 0896-4327
IngestDate Fri Sep 05 13:34:28 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:10:37 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:28:04 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:56:42 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:31:50 EST 2025
Sun Sep 21 06:20:11 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Language English
License http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4058-7827058fc62e7a43631f199c535b82f98d383345bd48f00edd78b59b72aecb4d3
Notes ArticleID:JOIC268
ark:/67375/WNG-CB4WR426-G
istex:F8C656970A45E5701E7B117B5B42B39A1BF96EDA
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
PMID 17680855
PQID 68136782
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_68136782
pubmed_primary_17680855
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1540_8183_2007_00268_x
crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_j_1540_8183_2007_00268_x
wiley_primary_10_1111_j_1540_8183_2007_00268_x_JOIC268
istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_CB4WR426_G
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2007-08
August 2007
2007-08-00
2007-Aug
20070801
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2007-08-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2007
  text: 2007-08
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace Malden, USA
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Malden, USA
– name: United States
PublicationTitle Journal of interventional cardiology
PublicationTitleAlternate J Interv Cardiol
PublicationYear 2007
Publisher Blackwell Publishing Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Blackwell Publishing Inc
References Stone GW, Ellis SG, Cox DA, TAXUS-IV Investigators, et al. One-year clinical results with the slow-release, polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stent: The TAXUS-IV trial. Circulation 2004;109(16 Suppl.):1942-1947.
Baim DS, Wahr D, George B, et al. Saphenous vein graft angioplasty free of emboli randomized (SAFER) trial investigators. Randomized trial of a distal embolic protection device during percutaneous intervention of saphenous vein aorto-coronary bypass grafts. Circulation 2002;105(11 Suppl.):1285-1290.
Schmuziger M, Christenson JT, Maurice J, et al. Reoperative myocardial revascularization: An analysis of 458 reoperations and 2645 single operations. Cardiovasc Surg 1994;2(5 Suppl.):623-629.
Tsuchida K, Ong AT, Aoki J, et al. Immediate and one-year outcome of percutaneous intervention of saphenous vein graft disease with paclitaxel-eluting stents. Am J Cardiol 2005;96(3 Suppl.):395-398.
Schampaert E, Cohen EA, Schluter M, C-SIRIUS Investigators, et al. The Canadian study of the sirolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of patients with long de novo lesions in small native coronary arteries (C-SIRIUS). J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43(6 Suppl.):1110-1115.
Boyle EM Jr, Lille ST, Allaire E, et al. Endothelial cell injury in cardiovascular surgery: Atherosclerosis. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;6(3 Suppl.):885-894.
Shah PJ, Gordon I, Fuller J, et al. Factors affecting saphenous vein graft patency: Clinical and angiographic study in 1402 symptomatic patients operated on between 1977 and 1999. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;126(6 Suppl.):1972-1977.
Price MJ, Sawhney N, Kao JA, et al. Clinical outcomes after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for de novo saphenous vein graft lesions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interven 2005;65(2 Suppl.):208-211.
Schofer J, Schluter M, Gershlick AH, E-SIRIUS Investigators, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of patients with long atherosclerotic lesions in small coronary arteries: Double-blind, randomised controlled trial (E-SIRIUS). Lancet 2003;362(9390 Suppl.):1093-1099.
Ge L, Iakovou I, Sangiorgi GM, et al. Treatment of saphenous vein graft lesions with drug-eluting stents: Immediate and midterm outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45(7 Suppl.):989-994.
Regar E, Serruys PW, Bode C, RAVEL Study Group, et al. Angiographic findings of the multicenter randomized study with the sirolimus-eluting Bx velocity balloon-expandable stent (RAVEL): Sirolimus-eluting stents inhibit restenosis irrespective of the vessel size. Circulation 2002;106(15 Suppl.):1949-1956.
Vermeersch P, Agostoni P, Verheye S, et al. Randomized double-blind comparison of sirolimus-eluting stent versus bare-metal stent implantation in diseased saphenous vein grafts: Six-month angiographic, intravascular ultrasound, and clinical follow-up of the RRISC Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48(12 Suppl.):2423-2431.
Motwani JG, Topol EJ. Aortocoronary saphenous vein graft disease: Pathogenesis, predisposition, and prevention. Circulation 1998;97(9 Suppl.):916-931.
Holmes DR Jr, Topol EJ, Califf RM, et al. A multicenter, randomized trial of coronary angioplasty versus directional atherectomy for patients with saphenous vein bypass graft lesions. CAVEAT-II Investigators. Circulation 1995;91(7 Suppl.):1966-1974.
Stankovic G, Colombo A, Presbitero P. Randomized evaluation of polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent in saphenous vein grafts: The randomized evaluation of polytetrafluoroethylene COVERed stent in saphenous vein grafts (RECOVERS) trial. Circulation 2003;108:37-42.
Yau TM, Borger MA, Weisel RD, et al. The changing pattern of reoperative coronary surgery: Trends in 1230 consecutive reoperations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;120(1 Suppl.):156-163.
Grube E, Silber S, Hauptmann KE, et al. TAXUS I: Six- and twelve-month results from a randomized, double-blind trial on a slow-release paclitaxel-eluting stent for de novo coronary lesions. Circulation 2003;107(1 Suppl.):38-42.
Hoye A, Lemos PA, Arampatzis CA, et al. Effectiveness of the sirolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of saphenous vein graft disease. J Invasive Cardiol 2004;16(5 Suppl.):230-233.
Fitzgibbon GM, Kafka HP, Leach AJ, et al. Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcome: Angiographic follow-up of 5,065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1,388 patients during 25 years. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28(3 Suppl.):616-626.
Ruchin PE, Faddy SC, Baron, et al. Use of sirolimus-eluting (CYPHER(tm)) stents in treatment of saphenous vein graft disease in an Australian population. Heart, Lung & Circulation 2004;13:S27.
Stone GW, Rogers C, Hermiller J, et al. and the FilterWire EX Randomized Evaluation Investigators. Randomized comparison of distal protection with a filter-based catheter and a balloon occlusion and aspiration system during percutaneous intervention of diseased saphenous vein aorto-coronary bypass grafts. Circulation 2003;108(5 Suppl.):548-553.
De Feyter PJ. Percutaneous treatment of saphenous vein bypass graft obstructions: A continuing obstinate problem. Circulation 2003;107(18 Suppl.):2284-2286.
Savage MP, Douglas JS Jr, Fischman DL, et al. Stent placement compared with balloon angioplasty for obstructed coronary bypass grafts. Saphenous Vein De Novo Trial Investigators. New Engl J Med 1997;337(11 Suppl.):740-747.
Chu WW, Kuchulakanti PK, Wang B, et al. Efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents as compared to paclitaxel-eluting stents for saphenous vein graft intervention. J Interven Cardiol 2006;19(2 Suppl.):121-125.
Wöhrle J, Nusser T, Kestler A, et al. Comparison of the slow-release polymerbased paclitaxel-eluting Taxus-Express stent with the bare-metal Express stent for saphenous vein graft interventions. Clin Res Cardiol 2007;96(2 Suppl.):70-76.
Cox JL, Chiasson DA, Gotlieb AI. Stranger in a strange land: The pathogenesis of saphenous vein graft stenosis with emphasis on structural and functional differences between veins and arteries. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1991;34(1 Suppl.):45-68.
Lefkovits J, Holmes DR, Califf RM, et al. Predictors and sequelae of distal embolization during saphenous vein graft intervention from the CAVEAT-II trial. Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial. Circulation 1995;92(4 Suppl.):734-740.
2004; 43
1997; 337
1995; 92
1995; 91
1991; 34
2005; 65
2006; 19
2007; 96
2004; 109
1997; 6
2005; 45
2003; 108
1996; 28
2003; 107
2004; 16
2006; 48
2004; 13
2002; 106
2005; 96
2002; 105
2000; 120
2003; 126
1998; 97
1994; 2
2003; 362
Ruchin PE (e_1_2_6_27_2) 2004; 13
Schmuziger M (e_1_2_6_7_2) 1994; 2
Lefkovits J (e_1_2_6_12_2) 1995; 92
e_1_2_6_18_2
e_1_2_6_19_2
e_1_2_6_10_2
e_1_2_6_11_2
e_1_2_6_16_2
e_1_2_6_17_2
e_1_2_6_14_2
e_1_2_6_15_2
e_1_2_6_20_2
Baim DS (e_1_2_6_13_2) 2002; 105
e_1_2_6_8_2
e_1_2_6_9_2
e_1_2_6_4_2
e_1_2_6_3_2
Fitzgibbon GM (e_1_2_6_6_2) 1996; 28
Hoye A (e_1_2_6_22_2) 2004; 16
e_1_2_6_5_2
e_1_2_6_24_2
e_1_2_6_23_2
e_1_2_6_2_2
e_1_2_6_21_2
e_1_2_6_28_2
e_1_2_6_26_2
e_1_2_6_25_2
References_xml – reference: Stone GW, Rogers C, Hermiller J, et al. and the FilterWire EX Randomized Evaluation Investigators. Randomized comparison of distal protection with a filter-based catheter and a balloon occlusion and aspiration system during percutaneous intervention of diseased saphenous vein aorto-coronary bypass grafts. Circulation 2003;108(5 Suppl.):548-553.
– reference: Ge L, Iakovou I, Sangiorgi GM, et al. Treatment of saphenous vein graft lesions with drug-eluting stents: Immediate and midterm outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45(7 Suppl.):989-994.
– reference: Lefkovits J, Holmes DR, Califf RM, et al. Predictors and sequelae of distal embolization during saphenous vein graft intervention from the CAVEAT-II trial. Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial. Circulation 1995;92(4 Suppl.):734-740.
– reference: Grube E, Silber S, Hauptmann KE, et al. TAXUS I: Six- and twelve-month results from a randomized, double-blind trial on a slow-release paclitaxel-eluting stent for de novo coronary lesions. Circulation 2003;107(1 Suppl.):38-42.
– reference: Price MJ, Sawhney N, Kao JA, et al. Clinical outcomes after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for de novo saphenous vein graft lesions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interven 2005;65(2 Suppl.):208-211.
– reference: Chu WW, Kuchulakanti PK, Wang B, et al. Efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents as compared to paclitaxel-eluting stents for saphenous vein graft intervention. J Interven Cardiol 2006;19(2 Suppl.):121-125.
– reference: Vermeersch P, Agostoni P, Verheye S, et al. Randomized double-blind comparison of sirolimus-eluting stent versus bare-metal stent implantation in diseased saphenous vein grafts: Six-month angiographic, intravascular ultrasound, and clinical follow-up of the RRISC Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48(12 Suppl.):2423-2431.
– reference: Ruchin PE, Faddy SC, Baron, et al. Use of sirolimus-eluting (CYPHER(tm)) stents in treatment of saphenous vein graft disease in an Australian population. Heart, Lung & Circulation 2004;13:S27.
– reference: Savage MP, Douglas JS Jr, Fischman DL, et al. Stent placement compared with balloon angioplasty for obstructed coronary bypass grafts. Saphenous Vein De Novo Trial Investigators. New Engl J Med 1997;337(11 Suppl.):740-747.
– reference: Hoye A, Lemos PA, Arampatzis CA, et al. Effectiveness of the sirolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of saphenous vein graft disease. J Invasive Cardiol 2004;16(5 Suppl.):230-233.
– reference: Stone GW, Ellis SG, Cox DA, TAXUS-IV Investigators, et al. One-year clinical results with the slow-release, polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stent: The TAXUS-IV trial. Circulation 2004;109(16 Suppl.):1942-1947.
– reference: Yau TM, Borger MA, Weisel RD, et al. The changing pattern of reoperative coronary surgery: Trends in 1230 consecutive reoperations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;120(1 Suppl.):156-163.
– reference: Regar E, Serruys PW, Bode C, RAVEL Study Group, et al. Angiographic findings of the multicenter randomized study with the sirolimus-eluting Bx velocity balloon-expandable stent (RAVEL): Sirolimus-eluting stents inhibit restenosis irrespective of the vessel size. Circulation 2002;106(15 Suppl.):1949-1956.
– reference: Baim DS, Wahr D, George B, et al. Saphenous vein graft angioplasty free of emboli randomized (SAFER) trial investigators. Randomized trial of a distal embolic protection device during percutaneous intervention of saphenous vein aorto-coronary bypass grafts. Circulation 2002;105(11 Suppl.):1285-1290.
– reference: De Feyter PJ. Percutaneous treatment of saphenous vein bypass graft obstructions: A continuing obstinate problem. Circulation 2003;107(18 Suppl.):2284-2286.
– reference: Tsuchida K, Ong AT, Aoki J, et al. Immediate and one-year outcome of percutaneous intervention of saphenous vein graft disease with paclitaxel-eluting stents. Am J Cardiol 2005;96(3 Suppl.):395-398.
– reference: Fitzgibbon GM, Kafka HP, Leach AJ, et al. Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcome: Angiographic follow-up of 5,065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1,388 patients during 25 years. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28(3 Suppl.):616-626.
– reference: Holmes DR Jr, Topol EJ, Califf RM, et al. A multicenter, randomized trial of coronary angioplasty versus directional atherectomy for patients with saphenous vein bypass graft lesions. CAVEAT-II Investigators. Circulation 1995;91(7 Suppl.):1966-1974.
– reference: Cox JL, Chiasson DA, Gotlieb AI. Stranger in a strange land: The pathogenesis of saphenous vein graft stenosis with emphasis on structural and functional differences between veins and arteries. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1991;34(1 Suppl.):45-68.
– reference: Schampaert E, Cohen EA, Schluter M, C-SIRIUS Investigators, et al. The Canadian study of the sirolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of patients with long de novo lesions in small native coronary arteries (C-SIRIUS). J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43(6 Suppl.):1110-1115.
– reference: Schofer J, Schluter M, Gershlick AH, E-SIRIUS Investigators, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of patients with long atherosclerotic lesions in small coronary arteries: Double-blind, randomised controlled trial (E-SIRIUS). Lancet 2003;362(9390 Suppl.):1093-1099.
– reference: Shah PJ, Gordon I, Fuller J, et al. Factors affecting saphenous vein graft patency: Clinical and angiographic study in 1402 symptomatic patients operated on between 1977 and 1999. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;126(6 Suppl.):1972-1977.
– reference: Schmuziger M, Christenson JT, Maurice J, et al. Reoperative myocardial revascularization: An analysis of 458 reoperations and 2645 single operations. Cardiovasc Surg 1994;2(5 Suppl.):623-629.
– reference: Boyle EM Jr, Lille ST, Allaire E, et al. Endothelial cell injury in cardiovascular surgery: Atherosclerosis. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;6(3 Suppl.):885-894.
– reference: Wöhrle J, Nusser T, Kestler A, et al. Comparison of the slow-release polymerbased paclitaxel-eluting Taxus-Express stent with the bare-metal Express stent for saphenous vein graft interventions. Clin Res Cardiol 2007;96(2 Suppl.):70-76.
– reference: Motwani JG, Topol EJ. Aortocoronary saphenous vein graft disease: Pathogenesis, predisposition, and prevention. Circulation 1998;97(9 Suppl.):916-931.
– reference: Stankovic G, Colombo A, Presbitero P. Randomized evaluation of polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent in saphenous vein grafts: The randomized evaluation of polytetrafluoroethylene COVERed stent in saphenous vein grafts (RECOVERS) trial. Circulation 2003;108:37-42.
– volume: 96
  start-page: 70
  issue: 2 Suppl.
  year: 2007
  end-page: 76
  article-title: Comparison of the slow‐release polymerbased paclitaxel‐eluting Taxus‐Express stent with the bare‐metal Express stent for saphenous vein graft interventions
  publication-title: Clin Res Cardiol
– volume: 105
  start-page: 1285
  issue: 11 Suppl.
  year: 2002
  end-page: 1290
  article-title: Saphenous vein graft angioplasty free of emboli randomized (SAFER) trial investigators. Randomized trial of a distal embolic protection device during percutaneous intervention of saphenous vein aorto‐coronary bypass grafts
  publication-title: Circulation
– volume: 65
  start-page: 208
  issue: 2 Suppl.
  year: 2005
  end-page: 211
  article-title: Clinical outcomes after sirolimus‐eluting stent implantation for de novo saphenous vein graft lesions
  publication-title: Catheter Cardiovasc Interven
– volume: 362
  start-page: 1093
  issue: 9390 Suppl.
  year: 2003
  end-page: 1099
  article-title: Sirolimus‐eluting stents for treatment of patients with long atherosclerotic lesions in small coronary arteries: Double‐blind, randomised controlled trial (E‐SIRIUS)
  publication-title: Lancet
– volume: 108
  start-page: 37
  year: 2003
  end-page: 42
  article-title: Randomized evaluation of polytetrafluoroethylene‐covered stent in saphenous vein grafts: The randomized evaluation of polytetrafluoroethylene COVERed stent in saphenous vein grafts (RECOVERS) trial
  publication-title: Circulation
– volume: 126
  start-page: 1972
  issue: 6 Suppl.
  year: 2003
  end-page: 1977
  article-title: Factors affecting saphenous vein graft patency: Clinical and angiographic study in 1402 symptomatic patients operated on between 1977 and 1999
  publication-title: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
– volume: 28
  start-page: 616
  issue: 3 Suppl.
  year: 1996
  end-page: 626
  article-title: Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcome: Angiographic follow‐up of 5,065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1,388 patients during 25 years
  publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol
– volume: 106
  start-page: 1949
  issue: 15 Suppl.
  year: 2002
  end-page: 1956
  article-title: Angiographic findings of the multicenter randomized study with the sirolimus‐eluting Bx velocity balloon‐expandable stent (RAVEL): Sirolimus‐eluting stents inhibit restenosis irrespective of the vessel size
  publication-title: Circulation
– volume: 48
  start-page: 2423
  issue: 12 Suppl.
  year: 2006
  end-page: 2431
  article-title: Randomized double‐blind comparison of sirolimus‐eluting stent versus bare‐metal stent implantation in diseased saphenous vein grafts: Six‐month angiographic, intravascular ultrasound, and clinical follow‐up of the RRISC Trial
  publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol
– volume: 97
  start-page: 916
  issue: 9 Suppl.
  year: 1998
  end-page: 931
  article-title: Aortocoronary saphenous vein graft disease: Pathogenesis, predisposition, and prevention
  publication-title: Circulation
– volume: 45
  start-page: 989
  issue: 7 Suppl.
  year: 2005
  end-page: 994
  article-title: Treatment of saphenous vein graft lesions with drug‐eluting stents: Immediate and midterm outcome
  publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol
– volume: 43
  start-page: 1110
  issue: 6 Suppl.
  year: 2004
  end-page: 1115
  article-title: The Canadian study of the sirolimus‐eluting stent in the treatment of patients with long de novo lesions in small native coronary arteries (C‐SIRIUS)
  publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol
– volume: 92
  start-page: 734
  issue: 4 Suppl.
  year: 1995
  end-page: 740
  article-title: Predictors and sequelae of distal embolization during saphenous vein graft intervention from the CAVEAT‐II trial
  publication-title: Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial. Circulation
– volume: 107
  start-page: 2284
  issue: 18 Suppl.
  year: 2003
  end-page: 2286
  article-title: Percutaneous treatment of saphenous vein bypass graft obstructions: A continuing obstinate problem
  publication-title: Circulation
– volume: 337
  start-page: 740
  issue: 11 Suppl.
  year: 1997
  end-page: 747
  article-title: Stent placement compared with balloon angioplasty for obstructed coronary bypass grafts. Saphenous Vein De Novo Trial Investigators
  publication-title: New Engl J Med
– volume: 91
  start-page: 1966
  issue: 7 Suppl.
  year: 1995
  end-page: 1974
  article-title: A multicenter, randomized trial of coronary angioplasty versus directional atherectomy for patients with saphenous vein bypass graft lesions. CAVEAT‐II Investigators
  publication-title: Circulation
– volume: 107
  start-page: 38
  issue: 1 Suppl.
  year: 2003
  end-page: 42
  article-title: TAXUS I: Six‐ and twelve‐month results from a randomized, double‐blind trial on a slow‐release paclitaxel‐eluting stent for de novo coronary lesions
  publication-title: Circulation
– volume: 16
  start-page: 230
  issue: 5 Suppl.
  year: 2004
  end-page: 233
  article-title: Effectiveness of the sirolimus‐eluting stent in the treatment of saphenous vein graft disease
  publication-title: J Invasive Cardiol
– volume: 19
  start-page: 121
  issue: 2 Suppl.
  year: 2006
  end-page: 125
  article-title: Efficacy of sirolimus‐eluting stents as compared to paclitaxel‐eluting stents for saphenous vein graft intervention
  publication-title: J Interven Cardiol
– volume: 2
  start-page: 623
  issue: 5 Suppl.
  year: 1994
  end-page: 629
  article-title: Reoperative myocardial revascularization: An analysis of 458 reoperations and 2645 single operations
  publication-title: Cardiovasc Surg
– volume: 108
  start-page: 548
  issue: 5 Suppl.
  year: 2003
  end-page: 553
  article-title: and the FilterWire EX Randomized Evaluation Investigators. Randomized comparison of distal protection with a filter‐based catheter and a balloon occlusion and aspiration system during percutaneous intervention of diseased saphenous vein aorto‐coronary bypass grafts
  publication-title: Circulation
– volume: 13
  start-page: S27
  year: 2004
  article-title: Use of sirolimus‐eluting (CYPHER(tm)) stents in treatment of saphenous vein graft disease in an Australian population
  publication-title: Heart, Lung & Circulation
– volume: 34
  start-page: 45
  issue: 1 Suppl.
  year: 1991
  end-page: 68
  article-title: Stranger in a strange land: The pathogenesis of saphenous vein graft stenosis with emphasis on structural and functional differences between veins and arteries
  publication-title: Prog Cardiovasc Dis
– volume: 109
  start-page: 1942
  issue: 16 Suppl.
  year: 2004
  end-page: 1947
  article-title: One‐year clinical results with the slow‐release, polymer‐based, paclitaxel‐eluting TAXUS stent: The TAXUS‐IV trial
  publication-title: Circulation
– volume: 96
  start-page: 395
  issue: 3 Suppl.
  year: 2005
  end-page: 398
  article-title: Immediate and one‐year outcome of percutaneous intervention of saphenous vein graft disease with paclitaxel‐eluting stents
  publication-title: Am J Cardiol
– volume: 120
  start-page: 156
  issue: 1 Suppl.
  year: 2000
  end-page: 163
  article-title: The changing pattern of reoperative coronary surgery: Trends in 1230 consecutive reoperations
  publication-title: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
– volume: 6
  start-page: 885
  issue: 3 Suppl.
  year: 1997
  end-page: 894
  article-title: Endothelial cell injury in cardiovascular surgery: Atherosclerosis
  publication-title: Ann Thorac Surg
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_2
  doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(97)00057-X
– ident: e_1_2_6_24_2
  doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2006.00118.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_17_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.01.024
– volume: 16
  start-page: 230
  issue: 5
  year: 2004
  ident: e_1_2_6_22_2
  article-title: Effectiveness of the sirolimus‐eluting stent in the treatment of saphenous vein graft disease
  publication-title: J Invasive Cardiol
– ident: e_1_2_6_10_2
  doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000069360.38675.22
– ident: e_1_2_6_4_2
  doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.97.9.916
– volume: 13
  start-page: S27
  year: 2004
  ident: e_1_2_6_27_2
  article-title: Use of sirolimus‐eluting (CYPHER(tm)) stents in treatment of saphenous vein graft disease in an Australian population
  publication-title: Heart, Lung & Circulation
– ident: e_1_2_6_3_2
  doi: 10.1016/0033-0620(91)90019-I
– ident: e_1_2_6_28_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.11.060
– volume: 28
  start-page: 616
  issue: 3
  year: 1996
  ident: e_1_2_6_6_2
  article-title: Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcome: Angiographic follow‐up of 5,065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1,388 patients during 25 years
  publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol
  doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(96)00206-9
– ident: e_1_2_6_20_2
  doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000079106.71097.1C
– ident: e_1_2_6_23_2
  doi: 10.1002/ccd.20369
– volume: 2
  start-page: 623
  issue: 5
  year: 1994
  ident: e_1_2_6_7_2
  article-title: Reoperative myocardial revascularization: An analysis of 458 reoperations and 2645 single operations
  publication-title: Cardiovasc Surg
  doi: 10.1177/096721099400200517
– ident: e_1_2_6_11_2
  doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.91.7.1966
– ident: e_1_2_6_8_2
  doi: 10.1067/mtc.2000.106983
– ident: e_1_2_6_26_2
  doi: 10.1007/s00392-006-0460-1
– ident: e_1_2_6_15_2
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14462-5
– ident: e_1_2_6_18_2
  doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000047700.58683.A1
– ident: e_1_2_6_21_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.03.084
– ident: e_1_2_6_25_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.09.021
– ident: e_1_2_6_9_2
  doi: 10.1056/NEJM199709113371103
– volume: 92
  start-page: 734
  issue: 4
  year: 1995
  ident: e_1_2_6_12_2
  article-title: Predictors and sequelae of distal embolization during saphenous vein graft intervention from the CAVEAT‐II trial
  publication-title: Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial. Circulation
– volume: 105
  start-page: 1285
  issue: 11
  year: 2002
  ident: e_1_2_6_13_2
  article-title: Saphenous vein graft angioplasty free of emboli randomized (SAFER) trial investigators. Randomized trial of a distal embolic protection device during percutaneous intervention of saphenous vein aorto‐coronary bypass grafts
  publication-title: Circulation
  doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000012783.63093.0C
– ident: e_1_2_6_5_2
  doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(03)01276-5
– ident: e_1_2_6_14_2
  doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000080894.51311.0A
– ident: e_1_2_6_16_2
  doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000034045.36219.12
– ident: e_1_2_6_19_2
  doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000127110.49192.72
SSID ssj0020552
Score 1.7957532
Snippet Background: Randomized trials in selected patient populations have demonstrated dramatic reductions in the incidence of in‐stent restenosis (ISR) following...
Randomized trials in selected patient populations have demonstrated dramatic reductions in the incidence of in-stent restenosis (ISR) following implantation of...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
wiley
istex
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 258
SubjectTerms Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Databases, Factual
Female
Graft Occlusion, Vascular - mortality
Graft Occlusion, Vascular - pathology
Graft Occlusion, Vascular - therapy
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
New South Wales - epidemiology
Paclitaxel - administration & dosage
Postoperative Complications
Prospective Studies
Saphenous Vein - transplantation
Stents
Survival Analysis
Treatment Outcome
Title Clinical Follow-Up of Paclitaxel-Eluting (TAXUS™) Stents for the Treatment of Saphenous Vein Graft Disease
URI https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-CB4WR426-G/fulltext.pdf
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fj.1540-8183.2007.00268.x
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17680855
https://www.proquest.com/docview/68136782
Volume 20
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVEBS
  databaseName: Academic Search Ultimate - eBooks
  customDbUrl: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s3936755&profile=ehost&defaultdb=asn
  eissn: 1540-8183
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0020552
  issn: 0896-4327
  databaseCode: ABDBF
  dateStart: 20030201
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.ebscohost.com/direct.asp?db=asn
  providerName: EBSCOhost
– providerCode: PRVWIB
  databaseName: Wiley Online Library - Core collection (SURFmarket)
  issn: 0896-4327
  databaseCode: DR2
  dateStart: 19970101
  customDbUrl:
  isFulltext: true
  eissn: 1540-8183
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0020552
  providerName: Wiley-Blackwell
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lj9MwELbQIiEuvB_d5eEDQnBIlfiROMelbLustAvatmxvlu04CLVKq24qKk4c-AH8Bn7a_hJm8igU7WGFOCWKNEk8nrE_e8bfEPJCeuhX4-KAG4BvQhoeGJUAkJMc3DLyhlk8nHx8Eh-OxdFETpr8JzwLU_NDbDbc0DOq8Rod3NjzbSfHoD5MOLxlImSx6iKejLisIranGyYpFsqq-E6o0jgQnCXbST2XvmhrprqOSl9fBkO3UW01LfVvk2nboDobZdpdlbbrvv7F9fh_WnyH3GrQK92vze0uueaLe-TGcROfv08WDc3ojPbBvuZfLr79GC_oPKcfjEM28LWfwaMDtPbiE3012p-Mhxfff76mwxITOiggaAqIlI7a9HeUHRrMQ5uvzulH_7mgg6XJS_q2Diw9IOP-wah3GDQ1HQIH0FAFAEgSuOYuZj4xgsc8yqM0dZJLq1ieqgyWzFxImwmVh6HPskRZmdqEGe-syPhDslPMC_-YUAPDiWXCRj6NRJZxC-aW2pDlylsnFOuQpO0_7RrCc6y7MdN_LHxAoRoViuU4MRIPCtXrDok2koua9OMKMi8rE9kImOUUk-YSqc9OBrr3RpydAhrSgw553tqQBlfG-IwpPChRxwr58_DHH9Wm9fvjCVZIkbJD4spArvxX-uj9ux7c7f6r4B65We9mY8rjE7JTLlf-KcCw0j6rHOwXSt0iOA
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9NAEF6hVgIulGdJeXQPCMHBkb0Pe30saZO0NAE1Cc1ttWuvEWrkRCEREScO_AB-Az-tv4QZPwJBPVSIky1LY3tnZ3a_3Zn9hpAX0kG_miT0uAH4JqThnlERADnJwS0DZ5jFw8m9ftgdiZOxHFflgPAsTMkPsd5wQ88oxmt0cNyQ3vRyjOrDjMNrKkIWqiYAym0M16GXHp6tuaSYL4vyO76KQ09wFm2m9Vz5po25ahvVvroKiG7i2mJiau-QSd2kMh_lorlc2Gby9S-2x__U5rvkTgVg6UFpcffIDZffJzd7VYj-AZlVTKMT2gYTm365_PZjNKPTjL43CRKCr9wEHh2hwecf6avhwXg0uPz-8zUdLDCngwKIpgBK6bDOgEfZgcFUtOnyM_3gPuW0MzfZgh6WsaWHZNQ-Gra6XlXWwUsAHSoPMEkE1ywJmYuM4CEPsiCOE8mlVSyLVQqrZi6kTYXKfN-laaSsjG3EjEusSPkjspVPc_eYUAMjimXCBi4ORJpyCxYXW59lytlEKNYgUd2BOqk4z7H0xkT_sfYBhWpUKFbkxGA8KFSvGiRYS85K3o9ryLwsbGQtYOYXmDcXSX3e7-jWG3F-BoBIdxpkvzYiDd6MIRqTO1CiDhVS6OGP75a29fvjERZJkbJBwsJCrv1X-uTdcQvu9v5VcJ_c6g57p_r0uP_2Cbldbm5jBuRTsrWYL90zQGUL-7zwtl91KyZU
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9NAEF6hVqq48IaGV_eAEBwc2fuw18eSNmkLDVWT0NxWu_YaoUROFBwRceLAD-A38NP6S5jxIxDUQ4U42bI0tnd2ZvfbndlvCHkhHfSrSUKPG4BvQhruGRUBkJMc3DJwhlk8nHzaD49G4mQsx3X-E56Fqfgh1htu6BnleI0OPk-zTSfHoD5MOLxhImShagOe3BYhLLYQIJ2vqaSYL8vqO76KQ09wFm1m9Vz5po2pahu1vroKh27C2nJe6t4mk6ZFVTrKpL0sbDv5-hfZ4_9p8h1yq4avdL-yt7vkhsvvkZ3TOkB_n8xrntEp7YKBzb5cfvsxmtNZRs9MgnTgKzeFR4do7vlH-mq4Px4NLr__fE0HBWZ0UIDQFCApHTb57yg7MJiINlt-ph_cp5z2FiYr6EEVWXpARt3DYefIq4s6eAlgQ-UBIongmiUhc5ERPORBFsRxIrm0imWxSmHNzIW0qVCZ77s0jZSVsY2YcYkVKX9ItvJZ7nYJNTCeWCZs4OJApCm3YG-x9VmmnE2EYi0SNf2nk5rxHAtvTPUfKx9QqEaFYj1ODMWDQvWqRYK15Lxi_biGzMvSRNYCZjHBrLlI6ot-T3feiItzgEO61yJ7jQ1p8GUM0JjcgRJ1qJBAD3_8UWVavz8eYYkUKVskLA3k2n-lT94fd-Du8b8K7pGds4Oufnfcf_uE3Kx2tjH98SnZKhZL9wwgWWGfl772C9AvJQM
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical+Follow%E2%80%90Up+of+Paclitaxel%E2%80%90Eluting+%28TAXUS%E2%84%A2%29+Stents+for+the+Treatment+of+Saphenous+Vein+Graft+Disease&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+interventional+cardiology&rft.au=RUCHIN%2C+P.E.&rft.au=FADDY%2C+S.C.&rft.au=MULLER%2C+D.W.M.&rft.au=BARON%2C+D.W.&rft.date=2007-08-01&rft.pub=Blackwell+Publishing+Inc&rft.issn=0896-4327&rft.eissn=1540-8183&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=258&rft.epage=264&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fj.1540-8183.2007.00268.x&rft.externalDBID=10.1111%252Fj.1540-8183.2007.00268.x&rft.externalDocID=JOIC268
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0896-4327&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0896-4327&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0896-4327&client=summon