A general approach to stepup multiple test procedures for free-combinations families

Dunnett and Tamhane (1992, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 87, 162–170) proposed a stepup multiple test procedure for simultaneous testing of k hypotheses satisfying the free-combinations condition under the normal setup in the equicorrelated case and later extended it for the non-equicorrelated case (1995...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of statistical planning and inference Vol. 82; no. 1; pp. 35 - 54
Main Authors Grechanovsky, Eugene, Pinsker, Ilia
Format Journal Article Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published Lausanne Elsevier B.V 01.12.1999
New York,NY Elsevier Science
Amsterdam
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0378-3758
1873-1171
DOI10.1016/S0378-3758(99)00030-0

Cover

More Information
Summary:Dunnett and Tamhane (1992, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 87, 162–170) proposed a stepup multiple test procedure for simultaneous testing of k hypotheses satisfying the free-combinations condition under the normal setup in the equicorrelated case and later extended it for the non-equicorrelated case (1995, Biometrics, 51, 217–227). However, our counterexample shows that the last one does not control the familywise error rate. We suggest a new approach to constructing stepup procedures which yields as particular cases the procedures by Hochberg (1988, Biometrika, 75, 800–802), Rom (1990, Biometrika, 77, 663–665) and Dunnett and Tamhane (1992) though not by Dunnett and Tamhane (1995). Furthermore, using this approach we develop a stepup test procedure for the non-equicorrelated case that generalizes the Dunnett and Tamhane (1992) procedure but differs from the Dunnett and Tamhane (1995) one. A new test algorithm for the generalized procedure has no break rules and in general makes k tests associated with k nodes on the graph of subset intersection hypotheses whose positions are dictated by the observations. Under the normality assumption, we suggest approximations for sharp critical values and for p-values. The performance of the procedure is illustrated by examples.
ISSN:0378-3758
1873-1171
DOI:10.1016/S0378-3758(99)00030-0