Integration of Drone and Satellite Imagery Improves Agricultural Management Agility

• Published in: Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland) Vol. 16; no. 24; p. 4688
• Main Authors: Ogungbuyi, Michael Gbenga, Mohammed, Caroline, Fischer, Andrew M., Turner, Darren, Whitehead, Jason, Harrison, Matthew Tom
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.12.2024
• Subjects: Accuracy; Agricultural management; Agricultural production; Analysis; artificial intelligence; Biomass; Cameras; Data collection; Decision making; Decision trees; drone; Drone aircraft; Ecosystems; Environmental stewardship; Error analysis; Evaluation; grassland; Grasslands; Land use; Learning algorithms; Livestock; Machine learning; Pasture; Pasture management; Photogrammetry; Productivity; Rain; Real time; Remote monitoring; Remote sensing; Root-mean-square errors; Satellite imagery; Satellites; Sheep; Standard error; Sward; Unmanned aerial vehicles; Vegetation; Australia; Tasmania Australia
• ISSN: 2072-4292; 2072-4292
• DOI: 10.3390/rs16244688

Effective agricultural management hinges upon timely decision-making. Here, we evaluated whether drone and satellite imagery could improve real-time and remote monitoring of pasture management. Using unmanned aerial systems (UAS), we quantified grassland biomass through changes in sward height pre- and post-grazing by sheep. As optical spectral data from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery is often hindered by cloud contamination, we assessed whether machine learning could help improve the accuracy of pasture biomass prognostics. The calibration of UAS biomass using field measurements from sward height change through 3D photogrammetry resulted in an improved regression (R2 = 0.75, RMSE = 1240 kg DM/ha, and MAE = 980 kg DM/ha) compared with using the same field measurements with random forest-machine learning and Sentinel-2 imagery (R2 = 0.56, RMSE = 2140 kg DM/ha, and MAE = 1585 kg DM/ha). The standard error of the mean (SEM) for the field biomass, derived from UAS-measured sward height changes, was 1240 kg DM/ha. When UAS data were integrated with the Sentinel-2-random forest model, SEM reduced from 1642 kg DM/ha to 1473 kg DM/ha, demonstrating that integration of UAS data improved model accuracy. We show that modelled biomass from 3D photogrammetry has significantly higher accuracy than that predicted from Sentinel-2 imagery with random forest modelling (S2-RF). Our study demonstrates that timely, accurate quantification of pasture biomass is conducive to improved decision-making agility, and that coupling of UAS with satellite imagery may improve the accuracy and timeliness of agricultural biomass prognostics.