Cerebral Amyloid Positivity Prediction Models Using Clinical Data in Subjects With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia
Objective Due to high cost of amyloid imaging, its use of amyloid imaging to confirm amyloid pathology is limited in clinical practice. It is of importance to develop a model to predict cerebral amyloid positivity using clinical data obtained from a memory clinic.Methods A total of 410 participants...
Saved in:
Published in | Psychiatry investigation Vol. 18; no. 9; pp. 864 - 870 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Korean Neuropsychiatric Association
01.09.2021
대한신경정신의학회 |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1738-3684 1976-3026 |
DOI | 10.30773/pi.2021.0104 |
Cover
Abstract | Objective Due to high cost of amyloid imaging, its use of amyloid imaging to confirm amyloid pathology is limited in clinical practice. It is of importance to develop a model to predict cerebral amyloid positivity using clinical data obtained from a memory clinic.Methods A total of 410 participants who had symptom of subjective cognitive decline and underwent amyloid PET and apolipoprotein ε (APOE) genotyping were retrospectively enrolled from January 2016 to January 2019. Models for cerebral amyloid positivity prediction were developed in all subjects, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) subjects, and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) dementia subjects through multivariate logistic regression analysis. The performance of the models was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and the area under the curve (AUC) values.Results Age, sex, years of education, body mass index (BMI), APOE4, and mini mental state examination score (MMSE) were selected for the final model for all subjects. The AUC value of the ROC curve was 0.775. Age, sex, years of education, BMI, and APOE4 were selected for the final model for MCI subjects. The AUC value was 0.735. Age, sex, years of education, BMI, APOE4, MMSE, and history of hypertension were selected for the final model for AD dementia subjects. The AUC value was 0.845.Conclusion This study found that models using clinical data can predict cerebral amyloid positivity according to cognitive status. These models can be useful as a screening tool predict cerebral amyloid deposition in cognitively impaired patients in a memory clinic. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Objective Due to high cost of amyloid imaging, its use of amyloid imaging to confirm amyloid pathology is limited in clinical practice. It is of importance to develop a model to predict cerebral amyloid positivity using clinical data obtained from a memory clinic.Methods A total of 410 participants who had symptom of subjective cognitive decline and underwent amyloid PET and apolipoprotein ε (APOE) genotyping were retrospectively enrolled from January 2016 to January 2019. Models for cerebral amyloid positivity prediction were developed in all subjects, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) subjects, and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) dementia subjects through multivariate logistic regression analysis. The performance of the models was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and the area under the curve (AUC) values.Results Age, sex, years of education, body mass index (BMI), APOE4, and mini mental state examination score (MMSE) were selected for the final model for all subjects. The AUC value of the ROC curve was 0.775. Age, sex, years of education, BMI, and APOE4 were selected for the final model for MCI subjects. The AUC value was 0.735. Age, sex, years of education, BMI, APOE4, MMSE, and history of hypertension were selected for the final model for AD dementia subjects. The AUC value was 0.845.Conclusion This study found that models using clinical data can predict cerebral amyloid positivity according to cognitive status. These models can be useful as a screening tool predict cerebral amyloid deposition in cognitively impaired patients in a memory clinic. Due to high cost of amyloid imaging, its use of amyloid imaging to confirm amyloid pathology is limited in clinical practice. It is of importance to develop a model to predict cerebral amyloid positivity using clinical data obtained from a memory clinic.OBJECTIVEDue to high cost of amyloid imaging, its use of amyloid imaging to confirm amyloid pathology is limited in clinical practice. It is of importance to develop a model to predict cerebral amyloid positivity using clinical data obtained from a memory clinic.A total of 410 participants who had symptom of subjective cognitive decline and underwent amyloid PET and apolipoprotein ε (APOE) genotyping were retrospectively enrolled from January 2016 to January 2019. Models for cerebral amyloid positivity prediction were developed in all subjects, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) subjects, and Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia subjects through multivariate logistic regression analysis. The performance of the models was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and the area under the curve (AUC) values.METHODSA total of 410 participants who had symptom of subjective cognitive decline and underwent amyloid PET and apolipoprotein ε (APOE) genotyping were retrospectively enrolled from January 2016 to January 2019. Models for cerebral amyloid positivity prediction were developed in all subjects, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) subjects, and Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia subjects through multivariate logistic regression analysis. The performance of the models was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and the area under the curve (AUC) values.Age, sex, years of education, body mass index (BMI), APOE4, and mini mental state examination score (MMSE) were selected for the final model for all subjects. The AUC value of the ROC curve was 0.775. Age, sex, years of education, BMI, and APOE4 were selected for the final model for MCI subjects. The AUC value was 0.735. Age, sex, years of education, BMI, APOE4, MMSE, and history of hypertension were selected for the final model for AD dementia subjects. The AUC value was 0.845.RESULTSAge, sex, years of education, body mass index (BMI), APOE4, and mini mental state examination score (MMSE) were selected for the final model for all subjects. The AUC value of the ROC curve was 0.775. Age, sex, years of education, BMI, and APOE4 were selected for the final model for MCI subjects. The AUC value was 0.735. Age, sex, years of education, BMI, APOE4, MMSE, and history of hypertension were selected for the final model for AD dementia subjects. The AUC value was 0.845.This study found that models using clinical data can predict cerebral amyloid positivity according to cognitive status. These models can be useful as a screening tool predict cerebral amyloid deposition in cognitively impaired patients in a memory clinic.CONCLUSIONThis study found that models using clinical data can predict cerebral amyloid positivity according to cognitive status. These models can be useful as a screening tool predict cerebral amyloid deposition in cognitively impaired patients in a memory clinic. Objective Due to high cost of amyloid imaging, its use of amyloid imaging to confirm amyloid pathology is limited in clinical practice. It is of importance to develop a model to predict cerebral amyloid positivity using clinical data obtained from a memory clinic.Methods A total of 410 participants who had symptom of subjective cognitive decline and underwent amyloid PET and apolipoprotein ε (APOE) genotyping were retrospectively enrolled from January 2016 to January 2019. Models for cerebral amyloid positivity prediction were developed in all subjects, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) subjects, and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) dementia subjects through multivariate logistic regression analysis. The performance of the models was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and the area under the curve (AUC) values.Results Age, sex, years of education, body mass index (BMI), APOE4, and mini mental state examination score (MMSE) were selected for the final model for all subjects. The AUC value of the ROC curve was 0.775. Age, sex, years of education, BMI, and APOE4 were selected for the final model for MCI subjects. The AUC value was 0.735. Age, sex, years of education, BMI, APOE4, MMSE, and history of hypertension were selected for the final model for AD dementia subjects. The AUC value was 0.845.Conclusion This study found that models using clinical data can predict cerebral amyloid positivity according to cognitive status. These models can be useful as a screening tool predict cerebral amyloid deposition in cognitively impaired patients in a memory clinic. KCI Citation Count: 0 |
Author | Joo, Soo Hyun Lee, Chang Uk |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Soo Hyun orcidid: 0000-0003-1390-3623 surname: Joo fullname: Joo, Soo Hyun – sequence: 2 givenname: Chang Uk orcidid: 0000-0001-6398-7330 surname: Lee fullname: Lee, Chang Uk |
BackLink | https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002756025$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) |
BookMark | eNptkc1rGzEQxUVJaRI3x951bA_r6mNX2r0UjNOmhoSGNqFHIWtnnUl2JVdaB_zfV2unh5YKxAzMez-GeefkxAcPhLzjbC6Z1vLjFueCCT5nnJWvyBlvtCokE-ok91rWhVR1eUouUnpk09OMq-YNOZVlxVjFqjOyX0KEdbQ9XQz7PmBLb0PCEZ9x3NPbCC26EYOnN6GFPtH7hH5Dlz16dNlzaUdL0dMfu_UjuDHRnzg-0BvsW7oMGz9xgK6GrcU4gB-p9S29hKlF-5a87myf4OKlzsj9l893y6_F9ber1XJxXTjZ1GNhBagaOqW7RinB6nJdOl7ZEnQrLSjlBBcNE3otRM0k6wA4azjvuFRlU1dMzsiHI9fHzjw5NMHioW6CeYpm8f1uZZpaCall1n46are79QCty4vm05htxMHG_cH598TjQ-Y8m7rM186MGXn_Aojh1w7SaAZMDvreegi7ZESleSPy11kqj1IXQ0oROuNwtNOxMxl7w5k5ZGy2aKaMzZRxdhX_uP4s93_9b4wkqPI |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s10928_024_09959_y crossref_primary_10_3233_JAD_221166 crossref_primary_10_1148_radiol_222441 |
Cites_doi | 10.1186/s13195-017-0248-8 10.3233/jad-2012-121315 10.1016/j.nbd.2020.104784 10.1016/j.jalz.2013.02.003 10.1038/mp.2013.40 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.02.012 10.1002/mds.21507 10.1056/nejmoa1202753 10.2967/jnumed.113.120618 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.03.012 10.1007/s40336-015-0102-6 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2004.01380.x 10.1038/nature25456 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.07.003 10.1093/geronb/57.1.p47 10.1212/wnl.65.12.1992-a 10.3233/jad-140705 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00309 10.1212/01.wnl.0000144280.59178.78 10.1097/nen.0b013e31824b211b 10.1212/wnl.43.2.250 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.0244 10.3346/jkms.2010.25.7.1071 10.1016/j.jalz.2017.06.2266 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright © 2021 Korean Neuropsychiatric Association 2021 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2021 Korean Neuropsychiatric Association 2021 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION 7X8 5PM ACYCR |
DOI | 10.30773/pi.2021.0104 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) Korean Citation Index |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1976-3026 |
EndPage | 870 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9862373 PMC8473862 10_30773_pi_2021_0104 |
GroupedDBID | --- 5-W 8JR 8XY 9ZL AAKDD AAYXX ACHQT ACYCR ADBBV AENEX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BAWUL CITATION DIK DU5 E3Z F5P HYE KQ8 M48 O5R O5S OK1 P5Y PGMZT RPM SJN W2D 7X8 5PM 53G ADRAZ FRP M~E |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-a2e68ef67f9662084b4c15a4e7d3ae66c2129027b228030fee10911f136498503 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 1738-3684 |
IngestDate | Tue Nov 21 21:05:04 EST 2023 Thu Aug 21 18:20:23 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 00:37:31 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:54:19 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:53:00 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 9 |
Language | English |
License | This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c398t-a2e68ef67f9662084b4c15a4e7d3ae66c2129027b228030fee10911f136498503 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0001-6398-7330 0000-0003-1390-3623 |
OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.30773/pi.2021.0104 |
PMID | 34500505 |
PQID | 2571927197 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 7 |
ParticipantIDs | nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9862373 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8473862 proquest_miscellaneous_2571927197 crossref_citationtrail_10_30773_pi_2021_0104 crossref_primary_10_30773_pi_2021_0104 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2021-09-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-09-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 09 year: 2021 text: 2021-09-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationTitle | Psychiatry investigation |
PublicationYear | 2021 |
Publisher | Korean Neuropsychiatric Association 대한신경정신의학회 |
Publisher_xml | – name: Korean Neuropsychiatric Association – name: 대한신경정신의학회 |
References | ref12 ref15 ref14 ref11 ref10 ref2 ref1 ref17 ref16 ref19 ref18 (ref13) 2013 ref24 ref23 ref26 ref25 ref20 ref22 ref21 ref28 ref27 ref7 ref9 ref4 ref3 ref6 ref5 Rascovsky (ref8) 2011 |
References_xml | – ident: ref20 doi: 10.1186/s13195-017-0248-8 – ident: ref17 doi: 10.3233/jad-2012-121315 – ident: ref24 doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2020.104784 – ident: ref1 doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2013.02.003 – ident: ref18 doi: 10.1038/mp.2013.40 – ident: ref27 doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.02.012 – ident: ref12 doi: 10.1002/mds.21507 – start-page: 2456 volume-title: Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia year: 2011 ident: ref8 – ident: ref2 doi: 10.1056/nejmoa1202753 – ident: ref5 doi: 10.2967/jnumed.113.120618 – ident: ref14 doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005 – ident: ref26 doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.03.012 – ident: ref15 doi: 10.1007/s40336-015-0102-6 – ident: ref11 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2004.01380.x – ident: ref19 doi: 10.1038/nature25456 – year: 2013 ident: ref13 – ident: ref4 doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.07.003 – ident: ref7 doi: 10.1093/geronb/57.1.p47 – ident: ref9 doi: 10.1212/wnl.65.12.1992-a – ident: ref22 doi: 10.3233/jad-140705 – ident: ref23 doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00309 – volume-title: VizamylTM Flutemetamol F 18 Injection ident: ref16 – ident: ref28 doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000144280.59178.78 – ident: ref3 doi: 10.1097/nen.0b013e31824b211b – ident: ref10 doi: 10.1212/wnl.43.2.250 – ident: ref25 doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.0244 – ident: ref6 doi: 10.3346/jkms.2010.25.7.1071 – ident: ref21 doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2017.06.2266 |
SSID | ssj0000070169 |
Score | 2.232074 |
Snippet | Objective Due to high cost of amyloid imaging, its use of amyloid imaging to confirm amyloid pathology is limited in clinical practice. It is of importance to... Due to high cost of amyloid imaging, its use of amyloid imaging to confirm amyloid pathology is limited in clinical practice. It is of importance to develop a... |
SourceID | nrf pubmedcentral proquest crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database |
StartPage | 864 |
SubjectTerms | Original 정신과학 |
Title | Cerebral Amyloid Positivity Prediction Models Using Clinical Data in Subjects With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia |
URI | https://www.proquest.com/docview/2571927197 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC8473862 https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002756025 |
Volume | 18 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
ispartofPNX | PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION, 2021, 18(9), , pp.864-870 |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Nb9QwELX6IVW9ICgglkLlVogTKUnsxN4DQmjbqq20qAdW9GbZjtNaDdklm0rtv2fGyRYi4NJDlEMcR_GMx_PG4zeEvLNWJKkRSSRiDgAlAzU2mRbR2PLSlKhSKZ4dnn7NT2f8_DK7_E0p1A_g8p_QDutJzZrq8O7n_WeY8J8QccZCsI8LD0AvTQ4RW6yTzbBVhFl8vaffecICeUfC8UiY4iyXvGPc_LuHbbLFeBZKvA0Wq_W6KQd-6DCL8o9l6eQpedL7k_RLpwDPyJqrd8jWtN8xf07uJ67BvWFo8gOwuS_oRUjTwpIR9KLBdigaijXRqiUNGQS0Jwut6JFuNfU1BfOC8Zol_e7bazr1VUEnq7wjegYWxTcYZaS6LuhRCDh6_YLMTo6_TU6jvtxCZNlYtpFOXS5dmYsSIFAaS264TTLNnSiYdnluU4xZpcIggw6LS-eQVDQpE5bzscxi9pJs1PPavSJU2qTIuABDGxvuuJE6l8yVmhlY_KTRI_JhNa7K9lzkWBKjUoBJgkTUwiuUiEKJjMj7h-aLjoTjfw0PQEjqxnqFtNl4v5qrm0YBODhTY0BvTLAR2V_JUMFcwg0SXbv57VKB-QKHFy4xImIg3IfPYrfDJ7W_DqzcsMwz-MDrR7-5S7bxR7oEtjdko21u3VvweFqzF3R5L4SifgGnlP99 |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cerebral+Amyloid+Positivity+Prediction+Models+Using+Clinical+Data+in+Subjects+With+Mild+Cognitive+Impairment+and+Dementia&rft.jtitle=Psychiatry+investigation&rft.au=Joo%2C+Soo+Hyun&rft.au=Lee%2C+Chang+Uk&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.pub=Korean+Neuropsychiatric+Association&rft.issn=1738-3684&rft.eissn=1976-3026&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=864&rft.epage=870&rft_id=info:doi/10.30773%2Fpi.2021.0104&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F34500505&rft.externalDocID=PMC8473862 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1738-3684&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1738-3684&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1738-3684&client=summon |